Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
120
vars:
30
size:
35,040
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------storage
variable name
type
display
value
format
label
variable label
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------success
str3
%9s
relationship
str10
project manager
%10s
experience
str10
%10s
type
str11
%11s
Type of project
race
str8
%9s
rivals
str10
%10s
resources
str10
%10s
scope
str10
%10s
objectives
str10
%10s
quality
str10
%10s
cost
str10
%10s
time
str10
%10s
control
str10
%10s
procurement
str10
%10s
contract
str10
%10s
interference
str10
%10s
communication
str10
%10s
stakeholders
str10
%10s
planning
str10
%10s
accountability
str10
%10s
transparency
str10
%10s
audit
str10
%10s
training
str10
%10s
leadership
str10
%10s
conflicts
str10
%10s
risk
str10
%10s
skills
str10
%10s
harmony
members
str10
%10s
labour
str10
%10s
trust
str10
%10s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sorted by:
Successful |
completion |
of project |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------No |
21
17.50
17.50
Yes |
99
82.50
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
working |
relationshi |
p with |
project |
manager |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
37
30.83
30.83
High |
47
39.17
70.00
Low
1.67
71.67
Very high
30
25.00
96.67
Very low
3.33
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
lack of |
experience |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
36
30.00
30.00
High |
43
35.83
65.83
Low
26
21.67
87.50
Very high
3.33
90.83
Very low
11
9.17
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Freq.
Percent
Type of |
project |
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Buildings
26
21.67
21.67
IT |
18
15.00
36.67
Lights |
18
15.00
51.67
Roads
38
31.67
83.33
Water |
20
16.67
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Race group |
of project |
leader |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Black
29
24.17
24.17
Coloured |
18
15.00
39.17
34
28.33
67.50
White |
39
32.50
100.00
Indian
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
rivals |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
23
19.17
19.17
High |
34
28.33
47.50
Low
14
11.67
59.17
Very high
34
28.33
87.50
Very low
15
12.50
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
shortage of |
resources |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
10
8.33
8.33
High |
35
29.17
37.50
Low
12
10.00
47.50
Very high
53
44.17
91.67
Very low |
10
8.33
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
change of |
scope of |
project |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
2.50
2.50
High |
31
25.83
28.33
Low |
15
12.50
40.83
Very high
70
58.33
99.17
Very low
0.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
failure to |
meet |
objectives |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
5.00
5.00
10
High |
24
20.00
25.00
Low |
14
11.67
36.67
76
63.33
100.00
Very high
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
quality of |
work |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
19
15.83
15.83
High |
46
38.33
54.17
Low
18
15.00
69.17
Very high
36
30.00
99.17
Very low
0.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Freq.
Percent
Problems |
related to |
cost |
overrun
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
11
9.17
9.17
High |
38
31.67
40.83
Low
22
18.33
59.17
Very high
48
40.00
99.17
11
Very low
0.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Freq.
Percent
Problems |
related to |
time |
overrun
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
11
9.17
9.17
High |
49
40.83
50.00
Low
15
12.50
62.50
Very high
45
37.50
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
lack of |
control of |
project |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
24
20.00
20.00
High |
51
42.50
62.50
Low
16
13.33
75.83
Very high
29
24.17
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
12
Problems |
related to |
procurement |
issues |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
29
24.17
24.17
High |
48
40.00
64.17
Low
13
10.83
75.00
Very high
29
24.17
99.17
Very low
0.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
contractual |
obligations |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
19
15.83
15.83
High |
50
41.67
57.50
Low
20
16.67
74.17
Very high
31
25.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
13
Problems |
related to |
interferenc |
e |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
21
17.50
17.50
High |
47
39.17
56.67
Low
12
10.00
66.67
Very high
38
31.67
98.33
Very low
1.67
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
poor |
communicati |
on |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
2.50
2.50
High |
25
20.83
23.33
Low
18
15.00
38.33
Very high
74
61.67
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
14
stakeholder |
s |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
10
8.33
8.33
High |
40
33.33
41.67
Low
13
10.83
52.50
Very high
57
47.50
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
poor |
planning |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
21
17.50
17.50
High |
29
24.17
41.67
Low
25
20.83
62.50
Very high
34
28.33
90.83
Very low
11
9.17
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
lack of |
accountabil |
ity
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
15
------------+----------------------------------Average |
15
12.50
12.50
High |
47
39.17
51.67
Low
17
14.17
65.83
Very high
41
34.17
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
lack of |
transparenc |
y |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
20
16.67
16.67
High |
39
32.50
49.17
Low
24
20.00
69.17
Very high
35
29.17
98.33
Very low
1.67
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
poor |
auditing
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
16
13.33
13.33
16
High |
44
36.67
50.00
Low
21
17.50
67.50
Very high
38
31.67
99.17
Very low
0.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
lack of |
proper |
training |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
26
21.67
21.67
High |
35
29.17
50.83
Low
27
22.50
73.33
Very high
31
25.83
99.17
Very low
0.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
lack of |
leadership |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
4.17
4.17
High |
29
24.17
28.33
17
Low
17
14.17
42.50
Very high
66
55.00
97.50
Very low
2.50
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
internal |
conflicts
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
14
11.67
11.67
High |
41
34.17
45.83
Low
18
15.00
60.83
Very high
47
39.17
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Freq.
Percent
Problems |
related to |
unforeseen |
risk |
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
15
12.50
12.50
High |
42
35.00
47.50
Low
18
15.00
62.50
Very high
45
37.50
100.00
------------+-----------------------------------
18
Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
lack of |
skills |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
29
24.17
24.17
High |
37
30.83
55.00
Low
24
20.00
75.00
Very high
27
22.50
97.50
Very low
2.50
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
lack of |
harmony |
among team |
members |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
33
27.50
27.50
High |
37
30.83
58.33
Low
13
10.83
69.17
Very high
33
27.50
96.67
Very low
3.33
100.00
------------+-----------------------------------
19
Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
labour |
issues |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
37
30.83
30.83
High |
44
36.67
67.50
Low
11
9.17
76.67
Very high
21
17.50
94.17
Very low
5.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Problems |
related to |
lack of |
trust in |
project |
leader |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
33
27.50
27.50
High |
45
37.50
65.00
Low
14
11.67
76.67
Very high
26
21.67
98.33
Very low
1.67
100.00
------------+-----------------------------------
20
Total |
120
100.00
exp
cell
chi2
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
manager
Average
High
Low
Very high
Very low
Total
-----------+-------------------------------------------------------+---------No |
4 |
21
6.5
8.2
0.3
5.3
0.7 |
21.0
7.50
4.17
0.83
1.67
3.33 |
17.50
-----------+-------------------------------------------------------+---------Yes |
28
42
28
0 |
99
30.5
38.8
1.6
24.8
3.3 |
99.0
21
23.33
35.00
0.83
23.33
0.00 |
82.50
-----------+-------------------------------------------------------+---------Total |
37
47
30
4 |
120
37.0
47.0
2.0
30.0
4.0 |
120.0
30.83
39.17
1.67
25.00
3.33 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(4) =
25.4853
Pr = 0.000
relationship
Problems |
related to |
working |
relationshi |
p with |
project |
manager |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Average |
37
30.83
30.83
High |
47
39.17
70.00
Low
1.67
71.67
Very high
30
25.00
96.67
Very low
3.33
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
success |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------No |
21
17.50
17.50
Yes |
99
82.50
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
relationshi |
24
p |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
5.00
5.00
Moderate |
114
95.00
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
experience |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
37
30.83
30.83
Moderate |
83
69.17
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Freq.
Percent
type |
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Buildings
26
21.67
21.67
IT |
18
15.00
36.67
Lights |
18
15.00
51.67
Roads
38
31.67
83.33
Water |
20
16.67
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Freq.
Percent
race |
Cum.
------------+-----------------------------------
25
Black
29
24.17
24.17
Coloured |
18
15.00
39.17
34
28.33
67.50
White |
39
32.50
100.00
Indian
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
rivals |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
29
24.17
24.17
Moderate |
91
75.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
resources |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
22
18.33
18.33
Moderate |
98
81.67
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
scope |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
16
13.33
13.33
Moderate |
104
86.67
100.00
------------+-----------------------------------
26
Total |
120
100.00
objectives |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
14
11.67
11.67
Moderate |
106
88.33
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
quality |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
19
15.83
15.83
Moderate |
101
84.17
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Freq.
Percent
cost |
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
23
19.17
19.17
Moderate |
97
80.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
Freq.
Percent
time |
Cum.
27
------------+----------------------------------Low |
15
12.50
12.50
Moderate |
105
87.50
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
control |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
16
13.33
13.33
Moderate |
104
86.67
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
procurement |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
14
11.67
11.67
Moderate |
106
88.33
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
contract |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
20
16.67
16.67
Moderate |
100
83.33
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
28
interferenc |
e |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
14
11.67
11.67
Moderate |
106
88.33
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
communicati |
on |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
18
15.00
15.00
Moderate |
102
85.00
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
stakeholder |
s |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
13
10.83
10.83
Moderate |
107
89.17
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
29
planning |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
36
30.00
30.00
Moderate |
84
70.00
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
accountabil |
ity |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
17
14.17
14.17
Moderate |
103
85.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
transparenc |
y |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
26
21.67
21.67
Moderate |
94
78.33
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
audit |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+-----------------------------------
30
Low |
22
18.33
18.33
Moderate |
98
81.67
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
training |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
28
23.33
23.33
Moderate |
92
76.67
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
leadership |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
20
16.67
16.67
Moderate |
100
83.33
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
conflicts |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
18
15.00
15.00
Moderate |
102
85.00
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
31
risk |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
18
15.00
15.00
Moderate |
102
85.00
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
skills |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
27
22.50
22.50
Moderate |
93
77.50
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
harmony |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
17
14.17
14.17
Moderate |
103
85.83
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
labour |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
18
15.00
15.00
32
Moderate |
102
85.00
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
trust |
Freq.
Percent
Cum.
------------+----------------------------------Low |
16
13.33
13.33
Moderate |
104
86.67
100.00
------------+----------------------------------Total |
120
100.00
33
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
relationship
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
16 |
21
1.1
19.9 |
21.0
4.17
13.33 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
98 |
99
5.0
94.0 |
99.0
0.83
81.67 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
114 |
120
6.0
114.0 |
120.0
5.00
95.00 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
18.9595
Pr = 0.000
34
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
experience
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
13 |
21
6.5
14.5 |
21.0
6.67
10.83 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
29
70 |
99
30.5
68.5 |
99.0
24.17
58.33 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
37
83 |
120
37.0
83.0 |
120.0
30.83
69.17 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
0.6294
Pr = 0.428
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
35
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
rivals
success |
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
17
4 |
21
5.1
15.9 |
21.0
14.17
3.33 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
12
87 |
99
23.9
75.1 |
99.0
10.00
72.50 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
29
91 |
120
29.0
91.0 |
120.0
24.17
75.83 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
44.7885
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
36
resources
success |
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
20
1 |
21
3.9
17.1 |
21.0
16.67
0.83 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
97 |
99
18.1
80.8 |
99.0
1.67
80.83 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
22
98 |
120
22.0
98.0 |
120.0
18.33
81.67 |
100.00
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
scope
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
15
6 |
21
2.8
18.2 |
21.0
37
12.50
5.00 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
98 |
99
13.2
85.8 |
99.0
0.83
81.67 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
16
104 |
120
16.0
104.0 |
120.0
13.33
86.67 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
74.3457
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
objectives
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
14
7 |
21
2.5
18.6 |
21.0
11.67
5.83 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
99 |
99
11.6
87.5 |
99.0
0.00
82.50 |
82.50
38
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
14
106 |
120
14.0
106.0 |
120.0
11.67
88.33 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
74.7170
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
quality
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
15
6 |
21
3.3
17.7 |
21.0
12.50
5.00 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
95 |
99
15.7
83.3 |
99.0
3.33
79.17 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
19
101 |
120
19.0
101.0 |
120.0
15.83
84.17 |
100.00
39
Pearson chi2(1) =
59.0375
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
cost
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
16
5 |
21
4.0
17.0 |
21.0
13.33
4.17 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
92 |
99
19.0
80.0 |
99.0
5.83
76.67 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
23
97 |
120
23.0
97.0 |
120.0
19.17
80.83 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
53.4245
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
40
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
time
success |
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
13
8 |
21
2.6
18.4 |
21.0
10.83
6.67 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
97 |
99
12.4
86.6 |
99.0
1.67
80.83 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
15
105 |
120
15.0
105.0 |
120.0
12.50
87.50 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
56.8048
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
41
+--------------------+
control
success |
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
12 |
21
2.8
18.2 |
21.0
7.50
10.00 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
92 |
99
13.2
85.8 |
99.0
5.83
76.67 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
16
104 |
120
16.0
104.0 |
120.0
13.33
86.67 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
19.2008
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
procurement
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+----------
42
No |
12 |
21
2.5
18.6 |
21.0
7.50
10.00 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
94 |
99
11.6
87.5 |
99.0
4.17
78.33 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
14
106 |
120
14.0
106.0 |
120.0
11.67
88.33 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
24.0291
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
contract
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
14
7 |
21
3.5
17.5 |
21.0
11.67
5.83 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
93 |
99
43
16.5
82.5 |
99.0
5.00
77.50 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
20
100 |
120
20.0
100.0 |
120.0
16.67
83.33 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
45.8182
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
interference
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
11
10 |
21
2.5
18.6 |
21.0
9.17
8.33 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
96 |
99
11.6
87.5 |
99.0
2.50
80.00 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
14
106 |
120
14.0
106.0 |
120.0
44
11.67
88.33 |
Pearson chi2(1) =
40.9437
100.00
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
communication
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
18
3 |
21
3.1
17.9 |
21.0
15.00
2.50 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
99 |
99
14.9
84.2 |
99.0
0.00
82.50 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
18
102 |
120
18.0
102.0 |
120.0
15.00
85.00 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
99.8319
Pr = 0.000
45
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
stakeholders
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
13
8 |
21
2.3
18.7 |
21.0
10.83
6.67 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
99 |
99
10.7
88.3 |
99.0
0.00
82.50 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
13
107 |
120
13.0
107.0 |
120.0
10.83
89.17 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
68.7316
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
46
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
planning
success |
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
13
8 |
21
6.3
14.7 |
21.0
10.83
6.67 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
23
76 |
99
29.7
69.3 |
99.0
19.17
63.33 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
36
84 |
120
36.0
84.0 |
120.0
30.00
70.00 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
12.3383
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
accountability
47
success |
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
14
7 |
21
3.0
18.0 |
21.0
11.67
5.83 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
96 |
99
14.0
85.0 |
99.0
2.50
80.00 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
17
103 |
120
17.0
103.0 |
120.0
14.17
85.83 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
57.6979
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
transparency
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
20
1 |
21
4.5
16.4 |
21.0
16.67
0.83 |
17.50
48
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
93 |
99
21.4
77.5 |
99.0
5.00
77.50 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
26
94 |
120
26.0
94.0 |
120.0
21.67
78.33 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
81.1792
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
audit
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
18
3 |
21
3.9
17.1 |
21.0
15.00
2.50 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
95 |
99
18.1
80.8 |
99.0
3.33
79.17 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+----------
49
Total |
22
98 |
120
22.0
98.0 |
120.0
18.33
81.67 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
77.1886
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
training
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
16
5 |
21
4.9
16.1 |
21.0
13.33
4.17 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
12
87 |
99
23.1
75.9 |
99.0
10.00
72.50 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
28
92 |
120
28.0
92.0 |
120.0
23.33
76.67 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
39.7548
Pr = 0.000
50
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
leadership
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
18
3 |
21
3.5
17.5 |
21.0
15.00
2.50 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
97 |
99
16.5
82.5 |
99.0
1.67
80.83 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
20
100 |
120
20.0
100.0 |
120.0
16.67
83.33 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
87.3766
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
51
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
conflicts
success |
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
13
8 |
21
3.1
17.9 |
21.0
10.83
6.67 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
94 |
99
14.9
84.2 |
99.0
4.17
78.33 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
18
102 |
120
18.0
102.0 |
120.0
15.00
85.00 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
43.9227
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
52
risk
success |
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
16
5 |
21
3.1
17.9 |
21.0
13.33
4.17 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
97 |
99
14.9
84.2 |
99.0
1.67
80.83 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
18
102 |
120
18.0
102.0 |
120.0
15.00
85.00 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
74.7520
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
skills
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
16
5 |
21
53
4.7
16.3 |
21.0
13.33
4.17 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
11
88 |
99
22.3
76.7 |
99.0
9.17
73.33 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
27
93 |
120
27.0
93.0 |
120.0
22.50
77.50 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
42.0800
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
harmony
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
11
10 |
21
3.0
18.0 |
21.0
9.17
8.33 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
93 |
99
14.0
85.0 |
99.0
54
5.00
77.50 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
17
103 |
120
17.0
103.0 |
120.0
14.17
85.83 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
30.5698
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
labour
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
12
9 |
21
3.1
17.9 |
21.0
10.00
7.50 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
93 |
99
14.9
84.2 |
99.0
5.00
77.50 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
18
102 |
120
18.0
102.0 |
120.0
15.00
85.00 |
100.00
55
Pearson chi2(1) =
35.4571
Pr = 0.000
+--------------------+
| Key
|--------------------|
|
frequency
| expected frequency |
|
cell percentage
+--------------------+
|
success |
trust
Low
Moderate |
Total
-----------+----------------------+---------No |
11
10 |
21
2.8
18.2 |
21.0
9.17
8.33 |
17.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Yes |
94 |
99
13.2
85.8 |
99.0
4.17
78.33 |
82.50
-----------+----------------------+---------Total |
16
104 |
120
16.0
104.0 |
120.0
13.33
86.67 |
100.00
Pearson chi2(1) =
33.5864
Pr = 0.000
56
Summary
of
results
obtained
from
cross-tab
analyses
Table 1 shows the top 5 influential predictor variables of success. Each test
of association was performed between the dependent variable of study
(successful completion of project) and the other independent variables
of study that are known to affect the capacity of the project manager to
successfully complete the project work being done.
At the 5% level of significance, a two-by-two test of association among two
categorical variables is said to be statistically significant if the P-value is
below 0.05. Otherwise, the association is said to be insignificant at the same
level of significance. At the 5% level of significance, significant associations
are characterized by P-values that are smaller than 0.05 and large observed
values of the chi-square random variable. In this study, the top 5 highly
significant predictors of success were selected based on these criteria.
In each chi-square test of association performed in this section, the expected
cell frequencies were all greater than 5. As such, results obtained from crosstab analysis were valid.
Table 1: Top 5 significant variables based on cross-tab analysis
Variable of study associated with Y Observed
(Successful completion of project)
chi-square
value
Resources
P-value
100.5508
0.0000***
Communication
99.8319
0.0000***
Leadership
87.3766
0.0000***
Transparency
81.1792
0.0000***
57
Audit
77.1886
0.0000***
Results
obtained
from
Pearsons
chi-square
tests
of
58