Sie sind auf Seite 1von 18


Sign up for our FREE Daily Email Newsletter

Ten Explosive U.S. Government Secrets about Israel

Absent greater transparency, Americans should assume the worst By Grant F. Smith October 24, 2013 "Information Clearing House - "IRmep" - - In 1968 Director of Central Intelligence Richard Helms wrote urgently to Attorney General Ramsey Clark and President Lyndon B. Johnson that some highly enriched uranium fueling Israel's Dimona nuclear reactor was stolen from America. LBJ reportedly uttered, "Don't tell anyone else, even [Secretary of State] Dean Rusk and [Defense Secretary] Robert McNamara." The FBI immediately launched a deep investigation into the inexplicably heavy losses at the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation NUMEC in Pennsylvania and the highly suspicious activities and Israeli connections of the Americans running it. The CIA was tasked to find out what was going on in Israel, and compiled thousands of documents about the incident. (PDF) Although CIA officials in a position to know unofficially went on record claiming a diversion had occurred, for decades the CIA has thwarted declassification and release of the LBJ memos. On October 18, 2013 the only appeals panel with the power to overrule the CIAthe Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel ISCAPsent notification that Americans are not yet ready to know the contents of the memos (ISCAP decision PDF). This denial of public release of decades-old secrets concerning U.S.-Israel relations is far from unique. Although the Obama administration promised unprecedented transparency, it has emasculated the public's ability to give informed consent on a wide range of key foreign policy issues. A review of ten particularly toxic U.S. secrets about Israel suggests stakeholders should start assuming the worst but most logical explanation.

In 2006 former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld famously told reporters at an Iraq war briefing "There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know." Bush administration secrecy and Rumsfeld's pithy quotes failed to quell gradual public awareness that the ill-fated invasion was launched on purposely fabricated pretexts. And yet the Iraq debacle could have been avoided if Americans had been better informed over time how government truly functions through greater access to the fourth category left unmentioned by Rumsfeld: "unknown knowns." "Unknown knowns" are the paradigm-shifting bits of information known only by a select few in government but kept from their fellow American citizens because they would reveal indefensible, secret policies and institution-level corruption that favor a special interest. By locking "unknown knowns" under heavy guard in document archives, covering them in secrecy classification stamps and making an example out of whistleblowers who release them without authorization, busy bureaucrats with the highest security clearances maintain a vast and growing trove of "unknown knowns." Historians and watchdog organizations are continually thwarted in their mandate to contextualize and educate the public about relevant past events that could deeply inform the governedand ultimately improve governance. Senator Carl Schurz said, "My country right or wrong, if right, to be kept right, and if wrong, to be set right." "Unknown knowns" obliterate the public's ability to execute the latter two-thirds of that sage advice. Even the passage of time does not guarantee "unknown knowns" ever become "known knowns." Under current government records preservation guidelinesparticularly for information that researchers are not actively seeking to declassifysome "unknown knowns" quietly become "unknown

unknowns" as they decay, are physically destroyed, erased or "lost." Many knowledgeable former officials take their secrets to the grave. As a product of the ill-gotten power and influence of the Israel lobby, the pile of "unknown knowns" about U.S.-Israel policy is particularly large. Curious Americans who rightfully question official narratives about the U.S.-Israel "special relationship" have often requested "unknown knowns" under the Freedom of Information Act. Former government insiders who know firsthand about explosive secrets often seek their public release to alert others using the Mandatory Declassification Review, even requesting documents by name, subject, location, author and date. After such "unknown knowns" (like the LBJ memos) are unsuccessfully sought for decades by multiple researchers, well-warranted suspicions arise about the reasons behind the impermeable government wall of refusal. The following ten US-Israel policy "unknown knowns" suggest the Israel lobby's ongoing corrupt power is the only possible explanation for why they are still secret. 1. Henry Morgenthau Jr's Israel policy is the stuff of legend in accounts about the birth of Israel. Some researchers claim that FDR's former Treasury Secretary was present at the original 1945 meeting of American Zionists with Jewish Agency executive director David Ben-Gurion to set up the massive Haganah smuggling network to steal, illegally buy and smuggle surplus WWII arms from the U.S. to Jewish fighters in Palestine. (report PDF) This was the first major broadly organized Israel lobby challenge to U.S. sovereignty. It successfully overrode American policy enshrined in neutrality and arms export laws. Others claim Morgenthau was also instrumental in the illicit financing Israel's clandestine nuclear weapons program in direct opposition to policy set by American presidents. The FBI's dusty 10,000 page file on Morgenthau, numbered 105-HQ-188123 (the 105 code signifies "foreign counterintelligence") including intercepts to Morgenthau from Israel, could finally clear up many of these allegations,

3. Israeli theft of nuclear material from NUMEC. In 2013, the CIA continues to resist release of thousands of files about the NUMEC diversion by referring to CIA Deputy Director for Operations John H. Stein's secret decision in 1979 (2013 FOIA denial PDF). Stein claimed that release of even a few of CIA's closely-held filesespecially if they were compared with Science Advisor of the Interior Commission Henry Meyer's blunt allegations (PDF) to Congressman Morris Udall in 1979 that NUMEC was an Israeli smuggling frontwas impossible "because of the need to have a coordinated Executive Branch position and our desire to protect a sensitive and valuable liaison equity." In plain English, that appears to mean Americans still cannot have official CIA confirmation of the uranium theft because the U.S. president would have to drop the ongoing nonsense of "strategic ambiguity" and forego intelligence Israel is funneling to America. 4. FBI files of Israeli (but not Russian) spies Russia's dashing red-headed spy, Anna Chapman, was arrested in 2010 and sent packing back Russia. Any interested American can now watch Chapman's moves in surveillance videos and read the FBI counterintelligence files. Not so with most of Israel's top spies who targeted American economic, nuclear and national defense infrastructure. America is still crawling with Israeli spies (our "constant companion" according to intelligence expert Jeff Stein). The 2010 revelations of nuclear equipment smuggling from Telogy (prohibited export smuggling PDF) in California and Stewart Nozette's 19982008 Israel Aerospace Industries-funded penetrations of classified U.S. information storehouses around Washington reveal that while Israeli spying has never stopped, secret prosecution strategies now emphasize quietly rolling up Israeli operations via industry regulators, fines and penalties or isolating and entrapping American spies on lesser charges but steering

around their Israeli handlers. Unlike its treatment of information requests about Russian spies, the FBI and Justice Department have denied every individual FOIA request for the files of major Israeli spies. Access to Rafael Eitan's many harmful exploits against U.S. targets are banned from release unless Eitan personally waives his privacy rights (FOIA denial). The FBI claimed it can no longer find files about deceased nuclear espionage mastermind Avraham Hermoni, even though his name appears across many previously released NUMEC files (FOIA denial PDF). Flooding from Hurricane Sandy is the excuse the FBI gives for not being able to find files on spy-for-Israel Ben Ami-Kadish (Flood FOIA denial PDF). One might argue it is merely a series of unfortunate events that keeps Israeli spy files out of public hands, except that the Justice Department has now issued a blanket ban on declassifying any files about the FBI's decades-long counterintelligence tango with Israel's Mossad. (Justice Department blanket denial PDF). The results of the Justice Department's kid-glove approach to Israel propagates into mandatory counterintelligence reports to Congress. Although Israel unambiguously ranked as a top economic and national defense intelligence threat in past assessments of agencies like the Office of National Counterintelligence Executive, because criminal prosecution strategies toward Israel (through not Iran, Russia or China) have been undermined from within, Israel has disappeared from the most current reports. 5. Jonathan J. Pollard's most heinous crime. Israel's only American spy ever to do serious time in jaildespite the best efforts of his many American and Israeli supporters to spring himonce confidently claimed before he was convicted that " was the established policy of the Department of Justice not to prosecute U.S. citizens for espionage activities on behalf of Israel." Many believe it was only Defense Secretary Casper Weinberger's classified briefing to sentencing Judge Aubry Robinson that made Pollard the near sole exception to that curious rule. Some Pentagon insiders and national security reporters believe Pollard's

sentence was so harsh because Israel used stolen U.S. intelligence as "trade goods" with the Soviet Union to increase Russian migrs to Israel. As Pollard's sentence draws to a close, few know exactly what Weinberger told Robinson that caused him to deliver a life sentence. The recent partial releases of a CIA damage assessment and a DIA video about Pollard shed little light.

In 2010, the Department of Defense disclaimed all ownership of the stillclassified "Weinberger declaration" passing the FOIA ball to the Justice Department's Criminal Division (FOIA transfer PDF). In a novel approach, the Executive Office of US Attorneys now claims that it cannot find its own copy but that FOIA does not require EOUSA FOIA officers to travel two blocks to the DC District Court to retrieve a sealed copy of the memorandum for review (FOIA denial PDF) or even ask DOD for a copy. The National Archives and Records Administration Office of Government Information Services OGIS agrees that there is no "duty for agencies to retrieve records that are not physically present in their own files." Although the 2008 case of Ben-Ami Kadish proves the Pollard espionage ring was much larger than was publicly disclosed in the late 1980s, the FBI has also not allowed release of its Jonathan Pollard investigation files (FOIA denial PDF) for overdue public review of how the investigation might havelike many othersbeen shortcircuited by the Department of Justice because it involved Israel. 6. Wiretap of AIPAC pushing for a US war on Iran. When AIPAC executives Keith Weissman and Steven J. Rosen dialed up Washington Post reporter Glenn Kessler in 2004, they were determined to leverage purloined classified U.S. national defense information into a story that Iran was engaged in "total war" against the US in Iraq. FBI special agents played audio intercepts of their pitch to AIPAC's legal counsel and AIPAC promptly fired the pair to distance itself from activities it had long

supported. Rosen and Weisman were later indicted under the Espionage Act, although the case was later quashed under an intense Israel lobby pressure campaign shortly after President Obama entered office. What exactly did AIPAC's two officials tell the Washington Post in its unrelenting drive to gin up a U.S. war with Iran? A decade later, the U.S. Department of Justice doesn't believe the American public is entitled to hear a tape long ago played to AIPAC's lawyer Nathan Lewin, even as AIPAC continues to agitate for more wars. (MDR denial PDF) 7. Niger uranium forgery underwriters. Although Ike may or may not have worried much about the implications of Operation Susannah, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee certainly did. A secret memo touched off years of Senate and Justice Department investigations into Israel lobbying over fears that American operatives might engage in other overseas clandestine provocations aimed at duping the U.S. into illadvised conflicts that would benefit Israel (the short memo references the Lavon affair twice). The Iraq war proves those fears were wellfounded. Many have long suspected that the Niger uranium forgeries, fake documents the Bush administration trumpeted to falsely accuse Iraq of buying uranium from Africa for nuclear weapons, were chartered by American neoconservatives in order to provide a pretext they desperately needed for war. Perhaps the FBI's investigation into the matter definitively proves it. However, despite years of requests for the 1,000 pages of that investigation, the FBI after initially duly proceeding with a FOIA, has now suddenly clammed up. (Niger uranium denial PDF) 8. Israel lobbyists embedded in the Treasury and Justice Departments. Israel lobbying organizations have been very effective at embedding their operatives in key positions across the Federal government, such as Stuart Levey in the Treasury Department's economic warfare unit, or former AIPAC director Tom Dine

as a contractor at the floundering US government-funded Arabic-language broadcaster Alhurra. It used to be possible to get a phone directory or conduct a comprehensive audit of which key political appointees (and the people they brought in) were running critical divisions of federal agencies by obtaining detailed Office of Personnel Management and other public records. Not anymore. (FOIA response PDF) Leveraging heightened post911 sensitivities, the US Treasury Department now claims the same protections against disclosure formerly enjoyed only by intelligence agency employees. Since the 1940s, the U.S. Department of Justice has earned a reputation as a place where Israel lobby criminal investigations go to die. Justice is also where an AIPAC official like Neil Sher can while away a few years on pet projects at taxpayer expense before moving on to more lucrative outside work. DOJ also routinely denies files about its past official decisions not to pursue criminal cases on the basis that doing so could jeopardize privacy, ongoing investigations, or factors underlying its coveted "prosecutorial discretion" (e.g. charging the disenfranchised but not powerful insiders for wrongdoing). Like Treasury, it is now almost impossible to survey and produce an organization chart of the Israel lobby's political appointees embedded at high and midlevel Justice Department posts or the biographies of the staff and contractors they bring in with them. 9. Unclassified IDA report about US charities funding the Israeli nuclear weapons program. Sensitive reports need not be classified for the government to hang on to them indefinitely. In 1987 the Institute for Defense Analyses delivered an unclassified report to the Department of Defense titled "Critical Technology Issues in Israel." The study implicates the Israeli Weizmann Institute for Science and Technology in nuclear weapons research, raising deep questions about the group's U.S. tax-exempt charitable fundraising and U.S. commitment to enforce the Nuclear NonProliferation Treaty. The Department of Defense withheld the IDA report from release on the basis of FOIA exemptions covering trade secrets and "intra-agency communications protected by the deliberative process

others. 10. NSA

privilege," among (FOIA denial PDF)

Justification for funneling raw intelligence on Americans to Israel. If former NSA contractor Edward Snowden has taught Americans anything, it is that "unknown knowns" are usually even worse than many might have first imagined. Some careful observers knew about massive NSA surveillance, while others alerted the public about the danger of "backdoor" U.S. intelligence flows to Israel. But who ever suspected the NSA was shipping wholesale raw intercepts gathered on Americans to Israel under a secret deal struck in 2009? No government that wholly denies such relevant information can claim legitimacy via consent of the governed. There can be little doubt why these ten files are kept closed: it serves the Israel lobby. The means by which this closure is sustained is also no secret. The millions of dollars that line politician's pockets, promote media pundits and quietly spirit political appointees into key gatekeeper positions maintain closed files and prevent informed public debate. Because of this, Americans should proceed assuming the worst conceivable, most logical explanation for any given U.S.-Israel "unknown known" is correctuntil proven otherwise. Under this guideline, it is prudent to believe that LBJproperly warned by his intelligence services and advisors that Israel was stealing the most precious military material on earth from Americawas simply too marinated in Israel lobby campaign cash to faithfully uphold his oath of office. It is similarly reasonable to believe the Justice Department and FBI won't release Israeli spy files because Americans would finally understand that, despite massive ongoing harm to America, political appointees in the Justice Department thwart warranted prosecutions. DOJ finds it much easier to stay "on message" through a long line of lobbyapproved but mostly bogus "Islamic terrorism cases" (many made via

sketchy undercover informants goading members of targeted minority communities into "terror" plots). According to its own records, every time it tried to uphold the law in the 1940s the DOJ suddenly found itself internally and externally swarmed by Israel lobbyists with inexhaustible financial war chests and legal experts working to quash warranted prosecutions in secret coordination with Israel. The DOJ now likely believes it can never win against Israel lobby generated media and political agitation when it moves to prosecute, and has now simply given up. It is logical to assume that Israel was found selling out America to the Soviets in Pollard's case, since little else explains the unusually harsh impact of Weinberger's secret memo. It is similarly likely that the FBI's AIPAC wiretaps would, if released today, accurately reveal Rosen and Weissman to be what they actually wereunregistered foreign agents operating on behalf of and in ongoing contact with the Israeli government rather than legitimate domestic lobbyists. It is similarly more productive to assume that at least one neoconservative operative with strong ties to the involved entities in Italy such as Michael Ledeenserved as barker to the Italian sideshow that disseminated forged documents. According to documents released by Edward Snowden, the transfer of raw NSA intercepts on American citizens to Israel was authorized under a secret doctrine that "the survival of the state of Israel is a paramount goal of US Middle East policy." This "prime directive" was probably a secret because it is a blank check obligating American blood and treasure to a cause American citizens never approved via advise and consent. But why did the Obama administrationeven as it dismissed espionage charges against AIPAC staff in 2009so deeply betray American privacy? Under "unknown known" doctrine, most would assume that like LBJ before him, Obama sold out America because his Israel lobby handlers secretly demanded and paid for it on behalf of a foreign country. What other goodies Obama doled out to Israel in exchange for help gaining the highest office remain to emerge. The official process for obtaining official public disclosure of "uknown knowns"the Freedom of Information Actdoes not function when the stakes in disclosure are high and Israeli interests are involved. Agencies (and ISCAP) correctly perceive government credibility is at stake when there is real openness, and that bona fide transparency would positively impact how government behaves. Visibly corrupt federal government officials and institutions are counting on continued secrecy to accumulate illegitimate

power by undermining public accountability. What's your response? - Scroll down to add / read comments

<="" td="" style="fontfamily: arial,sans-serif; color: #000" width="303">

Support Information Clearing House

Search Information Clearing House

Monthly Sign up for our FREE Subscription To Daily Email Newsletter Information Clearing House
Gadgets powered by Google For Email Marketing you can trust

Please read our Comment Policy before posting -

We ask readers to play a proactive role and click the "Report link [at the base of each comment] when in your opinion, comments cross the line and become purely offensive, racist or disrespectful to others.

The last comments for Follow the discussion Can You Guess the 10 Best Countries For Women? Hint: the U.S. Isn't One of Them awni The US is detoriorating in every aspect. less than 1 minute ago DrS 5 days ago The last comments for

Comments (17)
Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity

Israel is not America's ally Republicans Demand Social Security And

or friend. Medicare Cuts, Is It Reported? Israel is not a friend of the EU either. marcus

There are Israeli nukes pointed at Arab cities and Banat, take your rightwing ditto-head propaganda back to the Corporate Radio & Limbaugh call-in European capitals. line... It is all about less than 1 minute ago BLACKMAIL. Report Reply The last comments for Who Killed Michael Hastings? NSA WillFall 5 days ago Ash

I knew about this nuke AAssassinated for smooth contiuation of the purely plant getting ripped off by Christian bloodline of the monarchy. Recall how Israel, when it happened. the... My father was so mad about this incident, he talked about it for years. less than 1 minute ago The Liberty was what kept Israel in my mind, for the The last comments for rest of my life... Fukushima - A Global Threat That Requires a Global Response Report Reply Mike alexandra 5 days ago Why does a bird shit in its own nest? Because the bird was told by a human being it is safe.

facebook denied my attempt to put this on my less than 1 minute ago fb site. Is this a policy prevent Israel comments? Comments by IntenseDebate Report Reply 2 replies active 2 days ago

gerry o. 5 days ago with such control over US policy , I would not be surprised if Israel did not have a weapon in this country for use as blackmail. We know nothing about their nuclear program, or the amount of weapons they have. To quote some of my "friends" the only way to stop a bad guy with gun is a good guy with a gun. So nuclear deterrence, or parity, should be the order in the mid- east. Report Reply

frank scott 5 days ago if only half of this were true it would still be outrageously dangerous not only to our pretense of democracy but to our very lives.. given the potential for nuclear weapons use by fanatics who sincerely believe the world has them surrounded and wants to wipe them out... as ever... this is also, sadly, part of what persuades seemingly intelligent , thoughtful people to

accept the most fantastic conspiratorial plots behind the 911 attacks... "unknown knowns" offer control to power sources which threaten all of us and lucrative marketing careers for those far less powerful if possibly more imaginative who may be far less threatening to power but are allowed to operate for that reason. Report Reply

Joe 5 days ago Israel runs America and cares little that America is being run into the ground. Empires rise and Empires fall -- whilst the Ashekenazi just pack up their bags, and carry on their business in a new location. Report Reply

Bob Reynolds 4 days ago How can any discussion of Israel criminal conduct not include the attack on the USS Liberty?

Report Reply 2 replies active 4 days ago

Flummoxed 4 days ago Two interesting news items today: One from the AP... that Snowden released some papers( THEY THINK : ) ) There's that fantasy thinking again! .... Said papers per AP could compromise "some western diplomats..." well who the hell is that..AP?????? Must be something about Israel and as we have no free press or any of the big 10 amendments, perhaps we will never know. The trouble with LACK of transparency is that you leave the people with nothing but their imaginations and honestly strange government, those imaginations can be more powerful and damaging than the truth. That's why "Honesty is the best policy" is a truism. The other was re: the Saudis are losing trust in the US because it hasn't bombed Syria and isn't

( at the moment) bombing Iran...oh...right... rumors probably heard from their Israeli new BF! Wow, I guess HOOVER didn't die... he just moved to Israel. Report Reply

delta 4 days ago the most fantastic conspiritorial plot re 9-11 is the official conspiricy much loved by israel. Report Reply 1 reply active 4 days ago

Cinque Terrae 4 days ago What about the attack on the USS Liberty in 1967?? Report Reply 12Next

Post a new comment

Comment as a Guest, or