Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This is a draft document for use on Design-Build projects. As WSDOT works through Design-Build projects areas will be completed or revised as needed. Project team input on the development and use of this document is critical for it to be a useful tool on projects. The check list includes all the documentation required by the Design Manual for Design-Build Projects for both the Design Documentation Package (DDP) and the Project File (PF). The DDP is a permanent record of the design documents and decisions. It is submitted to the region for approval and archived for 75+ years. The Project File is kept in the Project Office and contains all documentation and data (such as quantity calcs, reports, correspondence) required for the project. The check list is based on the Design Manual for Design_Build Projects documentation requirements. The purpose of the checklist is to ensure that all applicable design elements are properly addessed in the project. It will also assist reviewers or other designers in locating information and determining what design decisions have been made. This check list will be used for Process and Stewardship reviews. Some chapters have supplemental check lists either for documentation requirements (3) or design parameters (3). Each supplemental chapter checklist can be accessed by clicking on the notation provided. Chapters with supplemental documentation requirement check lists are 210, 240, and 1300. Regions have developed the supplemental design parameter check lists for the specialty projects covered in Chapters 915, 1020, and 1060. Description - The Project Design Check List is organized to match the Design Manual for Design-Build Projects Chapters. Reference - This column gives the Design Manual for Design-Build Projects chapter or resources to refer to for criteria or requirements. Status - Review all items, referring to the appropriate matrix to determine whether the item is applicable for the project. Enter date, "completed" or "NA" for each item. If all the items in a chapter or division are not applicable, it can be hidden by pressing the "-" button on the left side-and then enter NA in the heading. When and By Whom - Identifies at what phase and who is responsible for documentation Remarks - List where the information can be found in the Design Documentation Package (DDP) or Project File (PF).
The shaded chapters are areas that the check list can be used as the documentation, when using this option include the checklist in the DDP
DESIGN ELEMENT - Items that relate to the matrix columns DESIGN MANUAL Reference - The chapter or figure in the Design Manual that establishes the criteria for this design element. MATRIX REQUIREMENT - Enter the design level from the appropriate matrix (F, M, B, EU/M, etc.) EXISTING/STANDARD/DETERMINATION - List the design criteria/describe the existing condition/list what the project will provide.
To use this file, download it to your PC or local server. Prepare and print an applicable set of documentation for each project in progress.
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
REFERENCE
WHEN
BY WHOM
Status
REMARKS
210
210 Pre-RFP Contract Pre-RFP 210 Contract Pre-RFP Contract WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB/WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT DB responsible for any changes to configuration DB responsible for any changes to configuration
PF
210.04 210.04(1) & 220.04(5) 210.05(4) 210.05(4) 210.05(5) 210.05(6) 210.06 210.07 210.07 210.08(1) 210.09(3) 210.09(3) 210.09(11)
Pre-RFP Pre-RFP Pre-RFP Pre-RFP Pre-RFP Pre-RFP Pre-RFP Pre-RFP Pre-RFP Pre-RFP Pre-RFP Pre-RFP
220
220.10 Environmental Procedures Manual Environmental Procedures Manual 220.07 & Environmental Procedures Manual Environmental Procedures Manual Pre-RFP Contract WSDOT DB DB responsible to update file for any modifications
DDP
NEPA Documentation
DDP
SEPA Documentation
DDP
DDP
240
Pre-RFP Contract WSDOT DB DB responsible to update file for any modifications
240 Figures 240-1a & 240-7a Figure 240-1a Figure 240-1a Figure 240-1a Figure 240-1a Figure 240-1a Figure 240-1a
PF PF PF DDP PF PF PF DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP PF PF DDP PF DDP August 2006
SEPA Approval Corps of Engineers - Section 404 Individual Permits Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit Water Quality 401 Certification Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Certification Coast Guard Section 9 Bridge Permit Corps of Engineers Section 10 Permit
Threatened and Endangered Species - Figures 240-1a & USFWS/NMFS 240-7a Historic Preservations Act - Section Figures 240-1b & 106 240-7c Land and Water Conservations Act Figure 240-1b Section 6(f) U.S. Dept of Transportation Act Figure 240-1b Section 4(f) Only if water quality permits are necessary Wild and Scenic Rivers Figure 240-1b Farmland Conversion Figure 240-1b Airport/Highway Clearance Figure 240-1b NPDES Municipal Stormwater Figures 240-1b & Discharge General Permit 240-7b NPDES Stormwater Construction Figure 240-1b Permit Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard NPDES Sand and Gravel General Figure 240-1b Permit Page 2 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
REFERENCE
WHEN
BY WHOM
Status
REMARKS
DDP PF PF DDP
Figure 240-1c Figure 240-1c Figures 240-1c & 240-7b Figure 240-1c Figure 240-1c Figure 240-1d Figures 240-1d & 240-7b Figures 240-1d & 240-7b Figure 240-1d Figure 240-1d Figure 240-1d Figure 240-1d Figure 240-1d Figure 240-1d Figure 240-1e Figure 240-1e Figure 240-1e Figure 240-1e Figure 240-1e
DDP
240.03
315
315 315.04(2) Contract Contract DB DB
325
325.03(2) & Figs. 325-3 through 325-7 Pre-RFP Contract Pre-RFP WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB DB WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT P/F and then technical score Include in RFP Approved deviations included in proposal Would require contract change P/F and then technical score Guidance to be included in the RFP
DDP
Design Exceptions
DDP
DDP
Approved deviations
325.03(4)
Proposal Contract
DDP DDP PF
Corridor or project analysis for change in design level Risk project solutions based on B/C ratios - analyses, design decisions and program funding decisions Address Sidewalk Ramps for ADA compliance
325.03(5) & Figs. 325-5 through 325-7 325.03(5) & Figs. 325-5 through 325-7 Figure 325-7
330
RFP 330.01 Contract DB 40% - Complete balance of Design File WSDOT 60% - Design File done to an acceptable stage for completing R/W and Access processes
DDP
August 2006
330.03, Project Summary: Project Definition, RFP WSDOT Design Decisions Summary, 330.06(1)(a),(b), Environmental Review Summary Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard (c)& Fig. 330-5 Contract DB Page 3 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
REFERENCE
WHEN
RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP
BY WHOM
WSDOT DB WSDOT
Status
REMARKS
DDP
Div. 2Exception - Hearings, Environ., Design (DE), Evaluate Upgrade (EU), Design Variance, DVI, Deviation, Project Control Form
Blank cell in design matrix which may be included in the project in special cases, if identified in the Project Summary or Project Control Form Cell entry F, M, or B with no DE or EU qualifiers and project does not correct design element/s to specified design level Deviation requests & approval Change in design level resulting from an approved Route Development Plan or corridor or project analysis documented as an EU or a deviation SEPA and NEPA Documentation
&
DDP
DDP
Figure 330-1 Contract 330.04(4) & Figure 330-2a & b RFP Contract
DDP
DDP
330.04(4)
DDP
RFP RFP
WSDOT WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT WSDOT DB WSDOT WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT DB WSDOT DB DB
Final 90%
DDP
Accident Analysis
Contract DDP Traffic Projections & Analysis Work Zone Transportation Management Plan / Traffic Control Plan Work Zone Traffic Control Strategy Figure 330-5 Figure 330-3b, Chapter 810 Figure 330-5, Chapter 810 RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP DDP Design Clear Zone Inventory Figure 330-5 Contract DDP Cost Estimate to complete project Interchange Plans, profiles, roadway sections R/W Plans Record of Survey or Monumentation Map Corridor or project analysis Intersection Plans FHWA determination for any new or revised access point (including interchanges, temp access breaks, and locked gate access) on interstate system Cultural & Historical Review Interchange Justification Report Decisions to differ from WSDOT design guidance Decisions for project components for which there is no WSDOT design guidance. Items on Figure 330-4 Design Criteria Worksheets Design Approval Final Design Documentation Acceptance 330.08 & Figure 330-5 Figure 330-5, 940.09 Figure 330-5 Figure 330-5 Figure 330-5 Figure 330-3a & 910.13(2) RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP RFP Contract RFP RFP Contract RFP 330.07 & Chapter 1425 Contract RFP RFP RFP Contract RFP Figure 330-5 Contract Figure 330-4 Specifying Note 4 330.08 330.08 330.09 Contract
90%
PF
Draft
PF
15% - 30%
30%
90%
DDP
Final Final 15% - 30% 90% 10% - Temporary access breaks for construction PS&E items
DDP
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
Design Level
EXISTING
STANDARD
Page 4 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
REFERENCE
Figure & 440.07, Permits 440-1 and Figures 440-4 through 440-8 440.08 & Figures 440-4 though 4408
WHEN
BY WHOM
Status
REMARKS
DDP
Div. 2 Speed - Hearings, Design selectionEnviron., - Corridor Analysis required for use of minimum design speed
Lane width
DDP
RFP
WSDOT
DDP
Shoulder width
440.09, Figs 4402, 440-3 and 4404 through 440-8 440.10 and Figures 440-4 through 440-8 440.13 & Figures 440-4 through 440-8 440.14 & Figures 440-4 through 440-8 440.15 & Figures 440-4 through 7b 440.16 & Figures 440-4 through 7b 440.09
RFP
WSDOT
DDP
Median width
RFP
WSDOT
DDP
DDP
RFP
WSDOT
DDP
Right of Way
DDP
Grades Maintenance office requests a shoulder width different than for the design class - justification for At existing bridge piers and abutments, shoulders less than full width to a minimum of 2 ft may be used with design exception Evaluation of curb grinding to maintain curb height Maintenance Superintendent's approval for use of curbing in areas of heavy snowfall Justification for use of curb when posted speed is greater than 40 mph Angle Parking on state route, requires an engineering study approved by the Region Traffic Engineer with final approval by the State Traffic Engineer Design Exception Documentation existing 6 lane roadway for existing 6 ft shoulders remaining when they are not being reconstructed or no other widening is required. Justify the selection of a P-6 design class on limited access highway When considering truck climbing lanes on a design class highway, perform an investigation to determine if a higher class highway is justified or vice versa Justification for Railroad Grade Separations Justification for Design Speeds greater than shown figures Justification for 11 ft lanes on Urban Managed Access Highways
DDP
DDP
440.09
PF PF
440.11(1) 440.11(1)
DDP
440.11(2)
DDP
440.12
DDP
DDP
DDP
Figures 440-5a through 7b Figures 440-5a through 8 Figures 440-5a through 7b Figure 440-8
510
510.03 & Materials Lab 510.04(4) 510.04(4)(b) 510.04(4)(d) Materials Lab & 510.07 HQ Materials Lab & 510.08(2) Materials Lab and HQ Pavement Type Contract RFP Contract Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract DB WSDOT DB DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB Draft Draft Only necessary when State supplies source
Draft
DDP/PF
PF
Geosynthetics
PF August 2006
530
Characteristics of chosen geosynthetic (AOS, permittivity, load-strain, 530.04 Contract DB Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard survivability)
Page 5 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
Soil Information (Geotechnical Report & Div. 2 - Hearings, Environ., will satisfy this documentation requirement.) Erosion Control/Silt Fence Plan
REFERENCE
WHEN
Contract Contract
BY WHOM
DB DB
Status
REMARKS
PF PF
Permits
530.05 530.05(6)
Div. 6 - Geometrics
Traffic Analysis
DDP/PF DDP DDP Capacity analysis Traffic Analysis TIA Report
610
610, Highway Capacity Manual 610.06 610.12 Final - Needed for Chan. Plan to determine R/W footprint Final - Needed for Chan. Plan to determine R/W footprint
620
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
Horizontal curve radii Lane transitions (tapers) Median width transitions Horizontal alignment justification Frontage road justification Number of lanes justification Realignment
620.04(2) 620.07(1) 620.07(2) 620.04(1) 630.07 620.05(2) 620.08 620.06(1)&(2) 620.08 620.08
RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract
630
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
Minimum length of vertical curves Maximum grade Minimum grade Length of grade Sag vertical curve having a length less than required for stopping sight distance Alignment on structures analysis Vertical alignment modification Procedures
630.03(2) 630.03(3) 630.03(4) 630.03(5) 630.03(2) 630.03(6) 630.07 & 620.04(1) 630.07
RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract
640
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
DDP
Justification for cross slopes other than 2% on tangents Justification for shoulder cross slopes different than the adjacent lane Cut slope selection Fill slope selection Economic comparison of wide to narrow median where land is expensive Justification for using steeper fill slopes than shown in the tables when traffic barrier is installed. Documentation of the reasons for modifying an existing cut slope Engineering study and recommendations for rock cuts Materials Engineer recommendation for stepped slopes Materials Engineer recommendation for ditch location at the toe of fill. Bridge end slopes
640.04(1)
WSDOT DB WSDOT DB
15%
15%
PF PF PF PF
PF PF
Turning Roadways 641 Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
DDP August 2006 Use of minimum width on two-lane twoway turning roadways 641.04(1)
Page 6 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
Use of2 minimum width onEnviron., two-lane oneDiv. - Hearings, & way turning roadways Use of minimum width on one-lane turning roadways
REFERENCE
WHEN
BY WHOM
Status
REMARKS
DDP DDP
Permits 641.04(2)
641.04(3)
Superelevation
DESIGN ELEMENT
642
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
DDP
Documentation of superelevation maximum rate being used and justification for a rate other than 10% maximum Low-Speed Urban Managed Access Highway Superelevation Superelevation on existing curves
RFP 642.04 Contract 642.05 and Figure 642-4 642.06 RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract
Superelevation for Turning Movements 642.07 & Figure at Intersections 642-4 Superelevation Runoff for Highway Curves Superelevation Runoff for Ramp Curves Justification for superelevation of ramps in urban area with design speed of 40 mph or less as an urban managed access highway 642.08 & Figures 642-5a through 642-5d 642.09 & Figs. 6425a through 642-6b
DDP
DDP
DDP
642.04
Sight Distance
DESIGN ELEMENT
650
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
DDP
650.04, Figures: 650-1 thru 5, & 650-11 &12 650.04(5), Figures 650-6, 650-7, and 650-13a 650.07, Figures 650-4, 650-5, 6507, 650-8, and 65013b, Chapter 630 650.05, Figure 6507, 650-9, and 65014 650.04(1), 650.04(3) and 650.04(5) 650.06, Figures 650-4, 650-5, 6507, and 650-10 RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB 15% 15% 15%
DDP
DDP
DDP
Passing sight distance Justification for increase in object height to 2.00 ft. in urban design areas (vertical and horizontal curves) Decision sight distance
DDP
DDP
700
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
DDP
Design Clear Zone inventory, evaluation documents and justification for design decision. Evaluation of medians and roadside clear zones in an urban environment but outside of an incorporated city Design Clear Zone establish by city managed access state highways Median accident evaluation and barrier warrant determination Median width deviation for barrier placement Evaluation of potential hazards beyond the Design Clear Zone Formalized agreement on responsibility with city/county in urbanized areas adjacent to incorporated cities and towns Justification for the design decision to be included as part of the project or Justification for barrier use not meeting criteria in 700.05 Evaluation of slopes
700.04(1)
RFP Contract
Draft
DDP
Draft
DDP
700.04(2) Contract 700.06 700.06 700.04(1) RFP RFP RFP Contract RFP 700.04(1), 700.04(2) Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB Draft Draft
DDP
DDP
700.05 700.05(1), Figure 700-5 and Chapters 430 and 700.05(2)(a) through (h) 700.05(2)c
DDP
DDP
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
WSDOT DB
Draft
Page 7 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
REFERENCE
WHEN
RFP Contract RFP Contract Contract RFP Contract
BY WHOM
WSDOT DB WSDOT DB DB WSDOT DB
Status
Draft
REMARKS
Draft
Traffic Barriers
DESIGN ELEMENT
710
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
DDP
Transition & Connection selection Standard Run of Barrier - height Bridge rail evaluation and upgrade method Shy distance requirements Barrier Deflection Flare Rate Barrier length of need calculation Long guardrail post justification or approved deviation Remove barrier not needed Barrier selection Justification for median barrier placement closer than 15' in medians wider than 30' Assessment of concrete barrier placement impact to wildlife Approved public interest finding for use of a sole source proprietary traffic barrier Retrofitting with new concrete bridge rail when no widening is proposed
710.04(1), 710.06(2), 710.08(2) 710.04(1), 710.06(3) & Figs. 710-6 & 710-10 710.04(2) 710.04(4) 710.05(1) 710.05(2) & Figure 710-2 710.05(3) & Figure 710-3 710.05(4) & Figs. 710-11(a)-(c) 710.06(1) & Figure 710-12 710.04 710.05 710.05(5) 710.08(3) & Figure 710-8 710.09 710.10(1)
Contract
DB
Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract Contract Contract RFP Contract Contract Contract RFP RFP Contract RFP Contract Contract Contract
DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB DB DB WSDOT DB DB DB WSDOT WSDOT DB WSDOT DB DB DB 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15%
PF PF PF
720
720.01(3) 720.03 720.03 Contract Contract Contract DB DB DB
810
RFP 810 Contract 810.01, 810.19, Figure 810-4 810.14, Figure 810-4 810.13, Figure 810-4 810.06(1) 810.18, Figure 810-4 810.07(5)(e) Contract 810.13(8) 810, 810.17 810, 810.18 RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT Draft Draft WSDOT Draft
PF
PF
Work Zone Traffic Analysis Documents Contact with local & WSP enforcement officials Time Restrictions Road Closures, detours and agreements Notification to maintenance regarding oversized vehicle restrictions Speed Limit reduction approval Transportation Management Plan Traffic Control Plans
PF PF PF
PF
PF PF PF
Signing
DESIGN ELEMENT
820
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
PF PF PF August 2006
Replacing/modifying signs 820.01 Contract DB Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard Approval of non-standard signs 820.01 Contract DB Approval of proposed guide signs 820.01 & 820.06 Contract DB
Page 8 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
REFERENCE
820.03(1) through Environ., & Permits (6) 820.03(5) 820.04(2) Traffic Office 820.07
WHEN
RFP Contract Contract Contract Contract
BY WHOM
WSDOT DB DB DB DB
Status
REMARKS
To level needed to determine easements for R/W Plan
DDP PF PF PF
Soils investigations for all sign bridge and cantilever sign supports Sign bridge vertical clearance Inventory of all existing signing within the project limits
Delineation
PF PF PF PF PF Decision to omit delineation work Approval of Region Traffic Engineer for use of barrier centerline Supplemental Right Edge line markings Use of Type 3 Raised Pavement Markers Justification to use guideposts on tangent sections due to snow, fog, or other reduced visibility conditions
830
830.01 830.04 830.04(4) 830.03 830.04 & Figure 830-2 Contract Contract Contract DB DB DB RFP Contract WSDOT DB Draft
Illumination
DESIGN ELEMENT
840
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
DDP
Identify facilities where the required illumination is proposed Major parking lots - illumination design providing appropriate light levels, circuitry design for security lighting
840.04
RFP Contract
WSDOT DB
Draft
DDP
840.04(7)
DDP
DDP
Justification and approval for any 840.05(1) through proposal to install additional (11) illumination at other highway facilities Justification for using nonstandard luminaries and light standards on state 840.06(4) highways
Contract
DB
Contract
DB
850
Planning Traffic Office 850.04 850.04(2) 850.05 RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP 850.05 Contract 850.05 850.06(2)(a) 850.06(2)(f) 850.06(7)(a) 850.06(7)(c) Traffic Office 850.06(10) RFP Contract RFP Contract Contract Contract Contract Contract DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB DB DB DB DB Final Final WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT Final Final Draft
DDP DDP PF
PF
PF PF PF PF PF PF
860
860 860.01 860.04 860.04(5) RFP Contract RFP RFP Contract WSDOT DB WSDOT WSDOT DB Final Contributions from both teams Final
910
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL
Most of these Items may be included in the Intersection Plan for Approval
EXISTING STANDARD
Intersection angle Intersection turning radii Sight distance at intersection Traffic analysis
15% - designed to level of footprint determination for R/W 15% 15% 15%
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard Contract DB
910.04(1)
Page 9 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
Traffic analysis
REFERENCE
910.04(1) 910.04(1) 910.04(2)(b) 910.04(2)( c )
WHEN
Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP
BY WHOM
DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT
Status
15% 15% 15%
REMARKS
Accident analysis Lane alignment Split Tee intersection evaluation / justification Justification and approval from Region Traffic Engineer to retain existing intersection with substandard configuration when accident analysis shows no history as a result of the configuration Crossroad design Traffic analysis for justification to use smaller design vehicle for any particular intersection leg Design Vehicle selection and justifications with regard to encroachments Justification for modifying right-turn corner designs as shown in Figure 9107 Plot showing design vehicle turning path template - right turn corner
DDP
910.04(2)(d) Contract 910.04(3) 910.05 RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP 910.05 Contract DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB 15%
DDP DDP
DDP
DDP
910.06
DDP
910.06 910.07(1)(a) & Figs 910-4, 910-8b & 910-9a through 9c 910.07(1)(a) & Figs 910-8a & 8b
15%
DDP
Left-turn lane storage length Left-turn lane justification including traffic and accident analysis signalized and unsignalized intersections, HCM analysis if performed Evaluate upgrade when existing opposing left turn lanes do not meet the 4 ft minimum clearance and have split phasing Justify modifications made to left-turn designs given in Figures 910-10a 10d. Document benefits and impacts, include a plot of the design showing the design vehicle turning template Two-way left-turn lane justification Right-turn lanes and drop lanes justification including accident study, traffic signal analysis and capacity analysis Speed Change Lanes justification Shoulder width reduction within channelized intersection areas Traffic island design U-turn justification and design Document the right of way width and provide a brief analysis of the intersection sight distance clarifying the reduction in setback distance. Document there is no accident problem and as a design exception Interchange ramp terminals sight distance and design (capacity determination and analysis) Traffic Control at intersection analysis Intersection plans and supporting information Local Agency or Developer Initiated Intersections Median lane reduction justification
15%
DDP
DDP
910.07(1)(a) Contract RFP 910.07(1)(a)(3) Contract 910.07(1)(b) RFP Contract RFP 910.07(2) Contract RFP Contract DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB 15% 15% 15%
DDP
DDP
DDP
Contract Contract
DB DB
DDP
910.1
RFP 910.10 & 910.12 Contract Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract
15%
DDP
15% 15%
Roundabouts
DDP DDP Locations where roundabouts need additional evaluation Capacity analysis for determining roundabout capacity
915
915.01(2) 915.05 RFP Contract RFP Contract WSDOT DB WSDOT DB
Determination - MS: radii Meets RFP Fix ENF: Existing WSDOT Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard Evaluation of turning RStandards 4 and R5 ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No to ensure maximum speed differential 915.06(9) between entering and circulating traffic is no more than 12 mph
Page 10 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DDP
Evaluation of turning radii R4 and R5 DESCRIPTION REFERENCE to ensure maximum speed differential 915.06(9) between entering and circulating traffic & Permits Div. 2 Hearings, Environ., is no more than 12 mph Right-Turn Slip Lane justification Striping plan Roundabout justification Approving authorities concurrence (other than WSDOT) HQ Design Office approval
DESIGN ELEMENT
WHEN
Contract RFP Contract Contract RFP RFP RFP
DESIGN LEVEL
BY WHOM
DB WSDOT DB DB WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT
Status
REMARKS
915.06(13) 915.09 915.12(1), (2) & (3) 915.12(1) 915.12(1) & (3)
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE
15%
Circulating Roadway Inscribed Diameter or ICD Central Island/Truck Apron Truck Apron Design Vehicle Number of Circulating Lanes Circulating Speed Circulating Width Deflection Radius Circulating Cross Slope Deflection Clearance Approach From Approach Speed (Posted Speed) Approach Design Vehicle Number of Entry Legs Entry Leg Spacing Angles Entry Speed Entry Width Approach Half Width Entry Angle Entry Deflection Radius Entry Deflection Curve Number of Exit Lanes Exit Speed Exit Width Exit Deflection Radius
DESIGN ELEMENT DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP
Stopping Sight Distance Approach Roadway Circulating Roadway Departure Roadway Intersection Sight Distance Approach Roadway - to left Approach Roadway - forward Circulatory Approach From... Islands (Must include a section for each approach)
Splitter Island Length Splitter Island Width @ Crosswalk Splitter Island Taper Pedestrian and Bicycles Crosswalk Location Barrier Free Passage Way Width Grade/Superelevation Approach Roadway Grade Right-Turn Slip Lane Radius Lane Width
DDP DDP
DDP
DDP DDP
Road Approaches 920 Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 11 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
Evaluation of existing road Div. 2 - Hearings, Environ., approaches that do not comply with access control requirements Utility and Special Use - Managed Access Facility when an agreement has been reached for the special purpose Plan or list of the road approaches
REFERENCE
WHEN
RFP
BY WHOM
WSDOT
Status
Final
REMARKS
DDP
& Permits
920.04
DDF
920.05(3)(b)
WSDOT WSDOT DB
Final Draft
PF
920.09
930
930.01 930.01 930.01 & 930.09 930.03 RFP Contract WSDOT DB Draft
DDP
930.03
DDP PF
DDP
930.04(b)
Traffic Interchanges
DESIGN ELEMENT
940
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE
DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP
Ramp Design Speed Ramp vertical stopping sight distance Ramp horizontal stopping sight distance Ramp maximum grade Ramp lane width Ramp shoulder width Accel lane number of lanes, length Decel lane number of lanes, length Left side on-off connections Spacing Justification to use midrange design speed values for portion of freeway-tofreeway ramps in lieu of upper range values Ramp lane increases Justification for ramp metering main line speed reduction Justification for mountable curb at interchange - speed of adjacent traffic exceeds 40 mph Lane balance - Not required, but desirable Accel lane length based on a speed less than design speed On-connection type justification, existing (with possible design exception) and new Decel lane length based on a speed less than design speed Off-connection type justification, existing (with a possible design exception) , and new Gores - Not required, but desirable
940.05(1) & Figure 940-1 940.05(2) & 650.05 940.05(2) & 650.05(5) 940.05(3) 940.05(4) & Figure 940-3 940.05(4) & Figure 940-3 940.06(4) & Figure 940-8 940.06(5) & Figure 940-10 940.04(1) 940.04(3) & Figure 940-5
RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP
WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB DB DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB
15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15%
DDP
940.05(1) Contract 940.05(5) 940.05(6) 940.06, Figs. 94013a,b, & c 940.06(1) & Figs. 940-6a & 6b 940.06(4) 940.06(4) (a),(c),(d) & Figs, 940-9a through 9d 940.06(5) 940.06(5)(a),(c) and Figs. 940-12a through 940-12e RFP Contract RFP Contract Contract Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract
DDP DDP
15% 15%
15% 15%
DDP
DDP
15%
15%
DDP
940.06(5)(b) & Figs. 940-11a & Contract DB 11b 940.06(8), & Weaving analysis and design Contract DB Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard Figure 940-5 15% RFP WSDOT Interchange Plan, contour grading 940.09 plan
Page 12 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DDP DDP/PF
REFERENCE
WHEN
Contract RFP
BY WHOM
DB WSDOT
Status
Final
REMARKS
& Permits
1425
940.09
Median Crossovers
Median crossover may be provided based on an analysis demonstrating that access through interchanges or intersections is not practical Operational Analysis Right of Way or Limited Access Plan approval, need, and design data showing a opening
960
DDP
960.01
Contract
DB
DDP
960.02
RFP
WSDOT
Final
PF
960.04
RFP
WSDOT
Final
1010
1010.04(1)(2)(3) & Figs. 1010-2a, 1010-2b and 1010-3 1010.04(1) 1010.04(4) 1010.05(1),(2) & Figures 1010-5 and 1010-6 1010.05(2) 1010.06(2) 1010.07(2) 1010.08(2) 1010.09 & Figure 1010-9 RFP WSDOT Final
RFP
WSDOT
Final
DDP DDP
1020 1020.01
1020.04
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE
15%
Width DDP DDP DDP Shared-Use Path or Bike Lane Separation to Obstructions Graded Area Clearance to Obstructions DDP DDP Horizontal Clearance Vertical Clearance Intersections with Highways DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP DDP August 2006 Intersection Crossing Angle Approach Treatment Ramp Widths Refuge Islands At-Grade Railroad Crossings Separation, Barrier, Fencing Design Speed Horizontal Alignment and Cross Section Stopping Sight Distance Sight Distance - Crest Vertical Curves Lateral Clearance - Horizontal Curves Grades Pavement Structural Section Structures Drainage Signing and Pavement Markings Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard Illumination
Page 13 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
REFERENCE
WHEN
BY WHOM
Status
REMARKS
1025
RFP 1025.04(1) Contract DB WSDOT 15%
RFP 1025.04(1) Contract 1025.04(2)(a), 1025.07(2)(a) RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract Contract Contract Contract
DDP
DDP
PF DDP
1025.07(2)(b) 1025.07(2)(e) & Figure 1025-3 1025.07(2)(e) & Figs. 1025-2a & 2b 1025.07(3) 1025.07(3) 1025.07(3)
PF DDP DDP PF
Side slopes adjacent to sidewalks Decisions to prohibit a pedestrian crossing at an intersection Approval of the installation of a midblock pedestrian crossing Approval of the installation of a bulb out on a state highway
1050
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
Operations Analysis of Need for HOV Lanes Freeway Operational Alternatives Conversion of existing freeway lane to an HOV lane requires a deviation request. Conversion of existing shoulder to an HOV lane requires a deviation request. Agreement with transit agency when shoulder is converted to HOV use
WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT 15% Final
DDP
1050.04(3)(c)
RFP Contract
DDP
1050.04(3)(c)
DDP DDP
Arterial Street Operational Alternatives Design Criteria Deviation required when any proposed element or existing design element does not meet the applicable design level for the project.
15%
DDP
DDP
Shoulder reduction to 2 feet on an arterial street with a proposed HOV lane requires justification. Location of an observation point/enforcement area other than that shown in figures 1050-4a and 4b
DDP
1055
Access Point Decision Report 1055.01(2) (Interchange Justification Report) Operational Analysis portion of the IJR 1055.01(2) & for flyer stop approval. 1055.05(9) Site Evaluation 1055.04 Evaluation of ramp connection spacing 1055.04(1)(a) Traffic analysis to determine 1055.04(1)(a) degradation of traffic operations Deviation for on-ramp or off-ramp grades increased by 1% and 2% 1055.05(4) respectively Justification for use of tapered off1055.05(7)(b),(d) connection Deviation for 14.5 foot minimum vertical clearance for a new HOV 1055.05(8) direct access ramp under an existing bridge. Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard ADA accessibility compliance 1055.06
Page 14 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
REFERENCE 1060
1060.03(1) 1060.03(2) 1060.03(3)
WHEN
BY WHOM
Status
Div. 11 - Structures
Site Data for Structures
PF
1110
Contract DB
PF
PF PF
1110.03(2), DOT Form 235-002, "Bridge Site Data - Figure 1110-1 & General" Bridge Design Manual 1110.04, DOT Form 235-001, "Bridge Site Data Figure 1110-1 & for Stream Crossings" Bridge Design Manual 240.03, & United States Coast Guard permit 1110.04 Coast Guard permit exemption Environmental Classification Summary DOT Form 235-002a, "Supplemental Bridge Site Data Rehabilitation/Modification" 1110.04 1110.06, Figure 1110-1 & Bridge Design Manual
Contract
DB
RFP RFP
WSDOT WSDOT
Final Final
PF
Contract
DB
Bridges
DESIGN ELEMENT
1120
DESIGN MANUAL REFERENCE DESIGN LEVEL EXISTING STANDARD
Vertical Clearance Final Geotechnical Foundation Report Structural Capacity Report Horizontal Clearance Evaluation of need and approval for enclosing the median area between bridges Agreement between railroad company and approval of WUTC for reduced clearance for closed or dedicated rail corridors that do not intermix with general rail freight rail traffic, new and existing
1120.04(5) 510.04(13) 1120.04(1)(b) 1120.04(3) & The Bridge Design Manual 1120.04(4)
WSDOT DB DB DB WSDOT DB DB
15%
15%
DDP
DDP
DDP
On existing structures being widened with a vertical clearance less than 16 ft on Interstate or other freeways and 1120.04(5)(b)(1) & less than 15.5 ft on non freeway Fig 1120-1 routes an approved deviation is required Resurfacing under an existing structure reducing vertical clearance to less than 16 ft on the interstate or 1120.04(5)(b)(2) & other freeways or less than 15.5 ft on Fig 1120-1 nonfreeway routes evaluate options an approved deviation is required Justification for eliminating an overlay in the vicinity of a bridge Contact Materials Lab and/or Bridge Office 1120.04(5)(b)(2)
DDP
DDP
PF
Materials Engineer approval to mill an 1120.04(5)(b)(2) existing surface Project with existing bridge and no widening on or under bridge but 1120.04(5)(b)(3) & already has a vertical clearance under Fig 1120-1 14.5 ft, an approved deviation is Railroad agreement allowing less than 1120.04(5)(b)(4) 22.5 ft. vertical clearance Correspondence involving the 1120.04(5)(d) MTMCTEA Justification and HQ concurrence for 1120.04(6) omitting bridge approach slabs Analysis of need and approval for protective screening on highway 1120.04(11) structures
RFP
WSDOT
Final
Contract Contract
DB DB
Retaining Walls and Steep 1130 Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard Reinforced Slopes
August 2006
Page 15 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
Traffic Barrier Shape in front of wall Div. 2 - Hearings, Environ., deviation Geotechnical/Soils Report Drainage detail deletions Bridge & Structures Principal Architect approval of aesthetic features Consideration of site constraints on constructibility Impact of other interfering design elements Consideration of Fall Protection for walls 10 ft or greater in height Approved work plan for an experimental proprietary retaining wall Approved public interest finding for use of a sole source proprietary retaining wall HQ Approval of Consultant designs Wall Site Data Check List, DOT351-009EF, and attachments
REFERENCE
WHEN
BY WHOM
Status
REMARKS
PF PF PF
1130.06(1) 1130.06(2) 1130.06(3)(b) Check with Bridge Office Contract RFP Contract DB WSDOT DB 15%
Noise Barriers
1140
1140.01 - See Noise Policies on HQ Environmental Affairs Office homepage 1140.03(2) 1140.03(2) 1140.03(2)(f) 1140.04 1140.04 1140.04 1140.04
DDP
Noise Report
RFP
WSDOT
Geotechnical/Soils Report List of design options considered and summary of evaluations Traffic Barrier Shape in front of wall deviation Openings approvals Wall attachments approval Report on impact due to change Final Selection approval
WSDOT DB WSDOT DB DB DB DB DB DB
Draft 15%
Div. 12 - Hydraulics
Hydraulic Design
DDP DDP PF PF Hydraulics Report Hydraulics Summary Temporary Erosion & Sediment Control (TESC) Plans Stormwater Site Plans (SSP)
1210
Hydraulics Manual Hydraulics Manual Highway Runoff Manual Highway Runoff Manual RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract RFP Contract WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB Draft Draft - 15% Draft - 15% Draft
Contour Grading
PF Contour Grading Plan
1310
1310.01 & Roadside Manual Contract DB
Vegetation
PF Mature characteristics of plant species evaluation
1320
1320.04(1) DB
Irrigation
PF PF Irrigation Plan Approved public interest finding for use of a sole source proprietary products
1330
1330.01 1330.03(c) listed under the design phase Contract Contract DB DB
Soil Bioengineering
PF PF August 2006
1350
For streambank/shoreline as part of the recommendations of the Hydraulic 1350.04 Contract DB Report As part of the recommendations in the 1350.04 Contract DB Stormwater Site -Plan (SSP)Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard Determination MS: Meets
Page 16 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
For slope as Environ., part of the & Div. 2 - stabilization Hearings, recommendations in the Geotechnical Report As part of the recommendations in the Environmental Documents Summary of site analysis Roadside Restoration Plan
REFERENCE
WHEN
Contract Contract Contract Contract
BY WHOM
DB DB DB DB
Status
REMARKS
PF PF PF PF
Permits
1350.04 1350.04
1410
1410.03(1) 1410.03(1) 1410.03(2) 1410.03(3) 1410.03(4) 1410.04(4) 1410.04, 1410.07(3), 1410.07(4) 1410.05 1410.05(6) RFP RFP Contract N/A Contract N/A RFP Contract Contract WSDOT DB DB 15% WSDOT WSDOT DB DB Final 15%
PF
Figure 1410-1
Access Control
DDP DDP PF DDP DDP DDP DDP Access connection permit Access deviation approval - State Design Engineer Application for an access connection Easement Findings and order Findings and order plan USFS request to obtain a road approach permit for a new access to a state highway that is crossing Forest Service Land
1420
1420.03 1420.03 1420.03 1420.03 1420.03 1420.03 1420.03 & MOU Highways Over National Forest Lands RFP RFP RFP Contract RFP Contract Contract Contract N/A WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT DB WSDOT DB DB DB
1425
1425.01, 1425.05(1) thru (8) and Figures 14251 and 1425-4 1425.04(1), (2) and (3) 1425.04(3) Figure 1425-3 RFP RFP WSDOT WSDOT Final Final
PF
RFP
WSDOT
Final - This must be completed prior to the Access Report and Plan process
DDP
DDP DDP
Limited Access
Evaluation of access control type (F, P, or M) when ROW is being acquired on an existing highway if shown on the ACTS list as either established or planned for access control Cost evaluation of acquiring limited access Findings and Order Access Report and Plan
1430
DDP
1430.01
RFP
WSDOT
Final
PF DDP DDP
1430.01 1430.02(1)(d) & 210 1430.02(2)(f) & (g) 1430.02(3) & Plans Preparation Manual
Initial cost estimate Final - WSDOT/GEC Lead - Risk Item Final - WSDOT/GEC Lead - Risk Item
DDP
RFP
WSDOT
Request and approval of gated 1430.03(1) RFP WSDOT approaches Staged access acquisition - access 1430.03(1) RFP WSDOT deviation approval Decision to defer acquisition of limitedENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix Determination - MS: Meets Standards control of access - access deviation 1430.03(1) RFP WSDOT approval
Final Final
PN: Proposed Nonstandard
Final
Page 17 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
REFERENCE
WHEN
BY WHOM
Status
REMARKS
DDP
Div. 2 - Hearings, Environ., & Permits The evaluation of full control for principal arterial highways requiring four or more through traffic lanes within a 20-year design period unless 1430.03(2)(b) approved for partial or modified control on existing highways by the Transportation Commission.
Limited access falls short of 300 ft or any access that has been allowed to remain within the first 130 ft. - Access deviation Headquarters approval of trails within the limits of full control limited access highways State Design Engineer approval of altering right of access by abutting property owner - partial limited access control State Design Engineer approval of shorter interval spacing for public road intersections State Design Engineer approval of excess approaches allowed as stage construction on partial control limited access highways. Department approval of designated school bus loading zone on traveled lane or adjacent thereto on two or fourlane highways with partial limited access control Bicycle or pedestrian prohibition on partial control limited access facilities due to unusual safety conditions. Headquarters approval of trails within the limits of partial control limited access highways State Design Engineer approval of altering right of access by abutting property owner - modified limited access control Design analysis of highways on which modified access control may be applied Access deviation approval where modified control is to be established and commercial areas may be excepted from control when all or most of the abutting properties have been developed Access deviation for any access that has been allowed to remain within the first 130 ft of an intersection - modified access control Department approval of designated school bus loading zone on traveled lane or adjacent thereto on rural two or four-lane highways with modified control Bicycle or pedestrian prohibition on modified control facilities due to unusual safety conditions. When trails are allowed on modified control limited access highways Negotiated width for approach type Local agency approval for any planned frontage road, county road, city street or cul de sac. Local agency written agreement to accept and maintain the new section as a county road or city street Request of local agency, private agency or private individual for state to build frontage road not the responsibility of the state upon reimbursement for all costs Turnback Agreement 1430.03(3)(d), 1430.04(3)(a)
N/A
DDP
RFP
WSDOT
Final
DDP
1430.03(6)
RFP
WSDOT
Final
DDP
1430.04(1)
N/A
DDP
1430.04(3)(b)
RFP
WSDOT
Final
DDP
1430.04(4)(b)
N/A
DDP
1430.04(5)(b)
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
1430.05(1)
N/A
DDP
1430.05(2)(b)
N/A
DDP
1430.05(2)(c)
N/A
DDP
1430.05(3)
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
1430.05(6) & Traffic Engineering Branch of Operations and Maintenance 1430.05(7) 1430.06(2) 1430.07
N/A
N/A RFP Contract RFP RFP WSDOT DB WSDOT WSDOT DB WSDOT DB WSDOT DB 15% 15% 15%
Final Draft
DDP
1430.07 Contract RFP 1430.07(1) Contract 1430.08 & Agreements Manual RFP Contract
DDP
DDP
Special Provisions for use of a direct 15% RFP WSDOT Determination - MS: Meets Standards approach by a railroad company for ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard other than those shown on the right of 1430.09(3) way and limited use plan and included in the right of way negotiations
Page 18 of 41
Proj. No.
Special Provisions for use of a direct approach by a railroad company for DESCRIPTION other than those shown on the right of way and limited use plan Environ., and included Div. 2Hearings, in the right of way negotiations Approval of modification to limited access highways by the E&EP Director or FHWA including right of way and limited access plan. New deeds if private approaches involved. Engineering review and recommendations, appraisals Modifications for Public At-Grade Intersections - request by or through local agency, intersection plan
Project Title:
Location
DDP
WHEN
Contract
BY WHOM
DB
Status
REMARKS
& Permits
DDP
RFP
WSDOT
Final
DDP
RFP
WSDOT
15%
Managed Access
1435
I-405 is a full control access highway. All connecting state highways are either full control or are within city limits so managed access does not apply.
DDP
1435.01, 1435.05, Access connection permits for all state 1435.06, managed access highways outside 1435.06(1), (2), (3) incorporated towns and cities & (4) Conforming Access Connection Permit Median Openings Nonconforming access connection permit Class 1 Justification through traffic analysis signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer for exception to right turn only access connection to multilane facility - Class 1 1435.01, 1435.06, & 1435.06(1) 1435.01, 1435.06 & 1435.06(4) 1435.02(1)(b)(2) & 1435.06(2)
N/A
DDP
1435.02(1)(b)(2)
N/A
DDP
DDP
DDP
Addition of new access points, public or private, that might require signalization need engineering 1435.02(2)(b)(1) analysis signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer - Class 2 Nonconforming access connection 1435.02(2)(b)(2) & permit - Class 2 1435.06(2) Variance permit based on special conditions and the exception is justified through traffic analysis signed 1435.02(2)(b)(2) and sealed by a qualified professional engineer - Class 2 For private access connections justification through traffic analysis signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer for exception to 1435.02(2)(b)(2) right turn only access connection to multilane facility, only if left turn channelization is provided - Class 2 Special conditions justify TWLTL and main line volumes are below 25,000 1435.02(3)(a) ADT - Class 3 Addition of new access points, public or private, that might require signalization need engineering 1435.02(3)(b)(1) analysis signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer - Class 3 Nonconforming access connection 1435.02(3)(b)(2) permit - Class 3 Variance permit based on special conditions and the exception is 1435.02(3)(b)(2) & justified through traffic analysis signed 1435.06(3) and sealed by a qualified professional engineer - Class 3 Addition of new access points, public or private, that might require signalization need engineering 1435.02(4)(b)(1) analysis signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer - Class 4 Nonconforming access connection 1435.02(4)(b)(2) & permit - Class 4 1435.06(2) Variance permit based on special conditions and the exception is 1435.02(4)(b)(2) & justified through traffic analysis signed 1435.06(3) and sealed by a qualified professional engineer - Class 4 Addition of new access points, public or private, that might require signalization need engineering 1435.02(5)(b)(1) analysis signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer - Class 5 Nonconforming access connection 1435.02(5)(b)(2) & permit - Class 5 1435.06(2)
N/A
N/A
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
N/A
DDP
N/A
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 19 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
REFERENCE
WHEN
BY WHOM
Status
REMARKS
DDP
DDP
Variance based on special Div. 2 -permit Hearings, Environ., & Permits conditions and the exception is 1435.02(5)(b)(2) & justified through traffic analysis signed 1435.06(3) and sealed by a qualified professional engineer - Class 5 Corner Clearance - Single access 1435.03, connection closer than minimum 1435.03(c) & WAC access point spacing requirements 468-51 conforming clearance permit Backup data justifying a significant change in use causing a change in the category of the access connection permit or one that causes an operational, safety or maintenance problem on the state highway requiring a new permit
N/A
N/A
PF
N/A
DDP
DDP
PF DDP
Department construction projects notification to affected property 1435.08(2)(b) owners, permit holders, business owners and emergency services Variance permit if a business cannot function properly with only one access 1435.08(2)(b) connection as a result of a department construction project Surety Bond when owner's contractor 1435.08(3) & WAC performs construction work to 468-51-070 complete access connection Adjudicative proceedings 1435.10 correspondence, exhibits
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
1440
1440.03(2)(c) DB
PF
1440.03(2)(d)
PF PF DDP DDP PF PF
DB DB DB
Monumentation
PF PF PF PF PF PF PF PF PF PF PF General statement about project's impacts on existing monuments General statement concerning new monuments DNR Permit for disturbing monuments Variance for omitting monumentation Record of Survey Mark Monumentation Map Record of Survey Land Corner Record DNR Permit for any monumentation work Field notes DNR Completion Report
1450
1450.01, & Figure. 1450-1 1450.01, & Figure. 1450-1 1450.01, & Figure. 1450-1 1450.04 1450.04 1450.04, .05, .07, 1450.09(2) 1450.06 1450.07, & 1450.09(3) 1450.09(1) Hwy Surveying Manual 1450.09(1) Contract Contract DB DB
Final
Final Final
30%
Fencing
DDP Reasons for providing fencing and for the type and configuration selected Justification for deferring or not providing fencing on a highway with limited access control or as otherwise recommended Evaluation of need to provide fencing around stormwater detention facilities
1460
1460.03(1) through (4) and 1460.04(1) through (3) 1460.03(2) Contract DB
DDP
Contract
DB
DDP
1460.03(4)
Evaluation on need to provide fencing 1460.03(4) - MS: Meets for Determination wetland mitigation sites Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
Page 20 of 41
Proj. No.
Project Title:
DESCRIPTION
REFERENCE
WHEN
BY WHOM
Status
REMARKS
DDP
Div. 2 - Hearings, Environ., Justification for why corrective action & is not taken when existing fencing with a rigid top rail will be left in place within the limits of a proposed project.
Approval for gates on limited access highways
Permits
1460.04 Contract DB
DDP
1460.05
Contract
DB
Maintenance
PF Maintenance concerns addressed Area Maintenance Supervisor RFP Contract WSDOT DB 30%
Utilities
PF PF PF PF PF PF PF PF PF Preliminary Engineering Agreement Construction Agreement Railroad agreements Railroad insurance and flagging Detour or Haul Road Agreement Service Agreements Local Agency Agreements Transit Agreement Turnback Agreements Utilities Manual, 2-4 Utilities Manual, 2-5 Utilities Manual, 3-5 Utilities Manual, 3-9 Utilities Manual, 4-2 Utilities Manual, 4-3 Utilities Manual, 4-5 Utilities Manual, 4-7 Utilities Manual, 6-1 RFP RFP RFP Contract Contract Contract RFP RFP RFP Contract WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT DB DB DB WSDOT WSDOT WSDOT DB Final Final Areas determined to included on Right of Way Plans Agreement completed Final Final Final
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 21 of 41
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 22 of 41
P/F and then technical score Include in RFP Approved deviations included in proposal Would require contract change
60% - Design File done to an acceptable stage for completing R/W and Access processes 40% - Complete balance of Design File
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 23 of 41
90%
Final 90%
90%
Draft
15% - 30%
30%
90%
Final Final 15% - 30% 90% 10% - Temporary access breaks for construction PS&E items
DETERMINATION
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 24 of 41
Draft Draft
Draft
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 25 of 41
DETERMINATION
DETERMINATION
15%
DETERMINATION
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 26 of 41
DETERMINATION
DETERMINATION
15%
15%
DETERMINATION
Draft
Draft
Draft
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
Page 27 of 41
Draft
DETERMINATION
15%
15%
Draft
Draft Draft
DETERMINATION
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 28 of 41
Draft
DETERMINATION
Draft Final
Final
Final Final
Final
Most of these Items may be included in the Intersection Plan for Approval
DETERMINATION
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
Page 29 of 41
15%
15%
15%
15% 15%
15%
15%
15% 15%
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 30 of 41
15%
DETERMINATION
DETERMINATION
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 31 of 41
Final Draft
Draft
15% 15%
15% 15%
15% 15%
15%
15%
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
15%
Page 32 of 41
Final
Final
Final
Final
15%
DETERMINATION
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 33 of 41
15%
15%
15% 15%
15%
DETERMINATION
Final
15% 15%
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 34 of 41
Final
Final Final
DETERMINATION
15%
Final
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 35 of 41
Draft
15%
Draft 15%
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 36 of 41
Final 15%
15%
Final - This must be completed prior to the Access Report and Plan process
Final Final
Final
Initial cost estimate Final - WSDOT/GEC Lead - Risk Item Final - WSDOT/GEC Lead - Risk Item
Final Final
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
Page 37 of 41
Final
Final
Final
15%
Final Draft
15%
15%
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
15%
August 2006
Page 38 of 41
Final
15%
I-405 is a full control access highway. All connecting state highways are either full control or are within city limits so managed access does not apply.
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 39 of 41
Final
Final Final
30%
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 40 of 41
30%
Determination - MS: Meets Standards ENNF: Existing Nonstandard, No Fix ENF: Existing Nonstandard, Will Fix PN: Proposed Nonstandard
August 2006
Page 41 of 41