REASURY-OFAC BOGOTA; (b)(2) JAN-7-04 10:04; PAGE US

Prtone:
Fax:

OFAC Bogota
To: OFAC Washington \ From: OFAC Bogota

Pate; January 7,2004

Pages: 3

CC:

• Urgent 0 For Review • Please Cammant O Please Reply D Please Recycle

Attached is a document, dated January 6,2004, that was <axed to OFAC Bogota by|
on January 6*. It should be filed with his appeal

Ail other redactions on this page made

pursuant to exemptions (b}(6),
(b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), and (b)(7)(F)

000646
•-K

H H H P T R E A S U F I Y - O F A C BOGOTA; JAN-7-04 1 0 : 0 4 ; PAGE 2 / 3

From: I 06/01/04 14:36:34 Pigina 1 de 1
W&er\l by the Award Winning Cheyenne Bilware

All other redactions on this page

made pursuant to exemptions (b)(6),
(b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), and (b)(7)(F)

To: Office a£ Foreign Assets control Bogota. Colombia, J&n. 6, 3003

U.S. Depirtment of the treasury

Attn: Jffie^M^^j^Frogrsms Division

Her: FACHoT|^^Bll| (b}(2)

Dear Sire,

To data t have austainod two meetings u i t : h h H ^ H H H I I i ^ H i H l a n d >*•»"» through

these nm*ir.\nqn actmnprjid to rclftar up n ^ ^ t u a t i o n in relation to i»y dnaignatioti.
y.aJ. emphasis i a relation ( 9 ^ ^ 1 1 1 the company known *s |

s u g g e s t e d t h e ^ ^ i j u ^ t h l ^ y ^ i r i t i n g and am doing 30.

SOR»i/h«£a around H H ^ H H H I I H H H c s a i B t 0 *>y homo acterjmwv
not having »ny cownunicatiDn with °~~"

OFAC icvinwiKl^^^igJl^^iJ^ths^^oaj^litt^^^^cou^^do »nd h« «n»utreti that

perbapj HHHBHIBI^BHiHHiiil^HHiHl^^BiHilI called he< at that nwoait
anrt ahe o^iii she would inveatigtte who could t»k« a c4ja Xils« this o»>« ^»<l fee
back Io me. Of t h i s I infoimod J H B B ^ M j B H ^ h ^ u i ^ j r e s e n t . ___
l a t e r r informed Mr. H H H H B that^HH^^^HHHHHHBBnd s p e c i f i c a l l y Hjp
|had 3 i « U i r caiea i n ^ c o u l ^ T ^ o n t a c t e d - The f i r s t eoaCdCt co

J w*s a ly by- H H H H I H i l 1 < 1 ^ wa3 l^tei this

attempt that oe to dlxcetly bocom* involved.
I conavlted
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ve could help, fie fox« makin^^final
decision ue aikad H H H H H H H H B 0 1 h i s ialationajlip utch the H H H M a r
t*4t tine. »• *na»ereii tlwt lie bad ended i ^ ± ^ U ^ « a t ^ ^ ^ » a ad tHtt^rhe deal
had Seen t h B t h a h « d t « k c n v h ^ v a a t h e r J H H B H J | j J | J J | | ^ a n d that they harf
(.alt-gji the j ^ j j j j j ^ j j ^ j ^ ^ j ^ ^ j j l ^ j ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y ^ ™ j i j o stated that he h»d

11 c uaa oa tht* h«o1» that I agreed Co holp hlsi.

Du«:ing the procc»» of th» paperwork coquir«d by <3ThC 1 spent & l o t 01 tlwo in
porsobal offices
J h i a work offices
a.nd the eonnwreial coop-at that time Mf^^BB He said to his employees that
in
was ||HHH0PHHHMflSBVHHH^HflHMR crdu justify my continual
preaene^andtnac^'ftslohavB tull cooperation in anything / asked tor. At the
Cine h* may nav« given Be ttmm papers t o sign and L probably did 10.
Thi* 1J.HO of work permitf.pri me to knov UAro than a feu things that otherwise
would bavB raMlnjdunknotfi^n<^^^ecid«dcha^ji^orB8Bnc^«i llb these offices was
inconvenientm^JH|H|^H^^^^^|HHHI^IHHiHH^ did keep up n»
ccjiunmucnLjoji MJ I i i H M B M B J ^ B ^ l B m B r ^
It was at ch«aa offices thai; I netHH|H^|HH||HH|||||[HHH|' 1rt '^ developed *
lappott with htm »nd ha bt^tn co teu»t»iesoiBewh»e^Ir^neofouc coavaraaeioss
i_P_e£ OPAC's exini«nc> and vthat I lenou of executive ordct 12378.
Itnovlcdoe at ehA*e Cactois MSS non-exiatant. TO this dsy i t ia
rcliCivelv unknown.
aC rhat tine interested in developing businesses
land haa bueinaaa relationship* with a vaxicty of r.ountriea
Including
PiantB, Runanio, EUI-JBCI*, Belgiiun, Inaia BTlti Korea.
It w*» in late HHH ei"«r 9/11, vhen t was in the process of ternliui 111*9 »y
 JAN-7-04 18:27; PAGE 2 / 2
SENT BY:.TREASURY-OFAC BOGOTA;
07/01/04 16:14:48 Paginal da 1
Sent by the Award Winning Cheyenne Bibvare
All other redactions-on this page
made pursuant to exemptions (b)(6),
(b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), and (b)(7)(F)

in relation to Che I
UCUCR celaxionship Jltti Che
W» agreed to talk abour. cho »atr.&r la
I had by this tAwe informed thi-c I would no longer be
iate petition and that evcrychjl'ntf would be taken
up
In hoveil na a contract, which ^^^^^^^Hlt^>, th-at
h* had signed _and t«)ced ch*c I help him c o j _ _ ^
Colombia. I said h« had nriainated his relocionahip wj.ch tii
• m m H products He told n« he was in that process and that he had. more
isyorTaiit busirm vith th« test of th« world and *ven with Colombian factories
uol r e l a r c ^ i o
in early f//M I visited throe Coiojabian ond felt
sacisiied rhTt h« could and Mould roduct» with otb«jr
local producer* and that th« iDducecs would furr.har supply
him .»nd th«~ tn» would have no uje {ac
Ic wita m ApxiL of 0 | tlut along
ua2 fnnnad JEor Che sole pur
uitn zt\a the
specifically.
roltt via to, as an to dccuaiant th«
dojjmr »iwl p/reaanc i t to ttw 'for approval. H« n a
unitbl« to do thia b«c*usi of additional r«quirea«nj
which ac« d ted in the oriaiiul doctwenu fro ated June H H *Q<)
daliVvrad Cd |and uftleh I annex in copy ola co this letter.
,a raanon. that on contracted a specialized firm,
a present tha dossier foil
*utboriti«» bacauae they nave MOX* clout and r«pr9s«nt mny
IB this efftet I attach tha xec.ipt- giv»n to »« in copy
riw the original te
thb lawyori working uith FtianLaxksting preaentcd th* do»=ici to
authotitiea *ft«c 3 aonr.hu of wranglioq with them about choir original
obs«ivacioni and the dostiec WJS accaptad vlch all legal d<jcwMn^> uhir.h
involved months of work.. I attftchth^lnvyera^^tte^toth^^HBBB vhieh
documents th» jielatioiuhip •>£ B W H B W B B ^ H B B I ^ ^ ^ H ^ H ^ B H Q J e local
cecipicnx. or bgneficxjry of the contract ajqned by t h e p ^ m m ^ n u t in no way
connected C n H j j j ^ H H i Ihe |

i\

1000648