Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
National Draft Neg National Draft Neg...................................................................................................................................................1 A/T Readiness/Hegemony Adv............................................................................................................................... !ol"nteer #etter $ %ffi&ers/Non-Coms................................................................................................................... !ol"nteer #etter $ 'ore Com(etent........................................................................................................................) !ol"nteer #etter - 'orale........................................................................................................................................* !ol"nteer #etter - Training......................................................................................................................................6 Can+t A&&ommodate 'ore.......................................................................................................................................7 Can+t Train Draftees ..............................................................................................................................................., D"m-s Do.n 'ilitary............................................................................................................................................./ 01"i(ment/2ystems Tradeoff T"rn........................................................................................................................13 !ol"nteers 4ey to 0ffe&tiveness............................................................................................................................11 A/T %verstret&5.....................................................................................................................................................12 A/T Re&r"itment 25ortfalls....................................................................................................................................1 A/T Retention Rates...............................................................................................................................................1) A/T Com(re5ensive 2ervi&e 6rograms..................................................................................................................1* A/T 2to(s %ffensive 7ars.....................................................................................................................................16 A/T 8ra1 2&enario...................................................................................................................................................17 A/T 8ra1 2&enario...................................................................................................................................................1, A/T 8ran 2&enario...................................................................................................................................................1/ A/T 8ran 2&enario...................................................................................................................................................23 A/T Nort5 4orea 2&enario.....................................................................................................................................21 A/T C'R 2&enario................................................................................................................................................22 A/T Ra&ism Adv....................................................................................................................................................2 'inority/6oor not %verre(resented.......................................................................................................................2 A/T 'inorities %verre(resented............................................................................................................................2) A/T 'inorities %verre(resented............................................................................................................................2* A/T 6oor %verre(resented.....................................................................................................................................26 A/T 9o.er 0d"&ated %verre(resented..................................................................................................................27 Can+t :a"rentee 01"ity..........................................................................................................................................2, 2(ending 9inks......................................................................................................................................................2/ 9ink $ Draft Cost...................................................................................................................................................2/ 9ink $ 8ra1 Cost..................................................................................................................................................... 3 A/T Draft 2avings.................................................................................................................................................. 1 0&onomy DA......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1NC 25ell............................................................................................................................................................... 2 1NC ;"ality 9ink.................................................................................................................................................. 9ink - Costs............................................................................................................................................................ ) 9ink $ Cons&ri(tion Ta<........................................................................................................................................ * 9ink $ H"man Ca(ital............................................................................................................................................ 6 9ink $ 0&on T5eory............................................................................................................................................... 7 9ink $ 0m(iri&ally................................................................................................................................................. , 9ink $ 0arning 6otential........................................................................................................................................ / A/T 'ilitary 2(ending #oosts 0&onomy...............................................................................................................)3 8ra1 Draft/7it5dra. C6.........................................................................................................................................)1 1NC 25ell...............................................................................................................................................................)1 A/T Not Ready.......................................................................................................................................................)2 Timeta-le 2olves 8ra1 2e&"rity..............................................................................................................................) 1
Cal 2k6-7
7it5dra. =ra&t"res 8ns"rgen&y.............................................................................................................................)) 7it5dra. 2olves 2oft(o.er..................................................................................................................................)* 7it5dra. 2olves Readiness...................................................................................................................................)6 7it5dra. 2olves Demo 6romo.............................................................................................................................)7 Draft 2olven&y $ :eneral 2e&"rity........................................................................................................................), Draft 2olven&y - 8nfrastr"&t"re..............................................................................................................................)/ %#> 9inks..............................................................................................................................................................*3 %#> 9inks..............................................................................................................................................................*1
Cal 2k6-7
Draft destroys retention of ran'ing officers. Bando( )*** ?Do"gA 2enior =ello. H Cato 8nstit"teA B=i<ing 75at Ain+t #rokeA T5e Rene.ed Call for Cons&ri(tionA 6oli&y
Analysis No. *1 A"g"st 1A 1///@ =or t5at reasonA fe. leaders in t5e armed servi&es .o"ld like to ret"rn to &ons&ri(tion. :ordon 2"llivanA former Army &5ief of staff and &"rrent (resident of t5e Asso&iation of t5e Fnited 2tates ArmyA statesA B'ilitary &ommanders (refer 5ig5-1"ality vol"nteers to mi<ed-1"ality draftees.C72 Retired 9t. :en. Al 9en5ardtA formerly t5e Army+s &5ief re&r"iterA em(5asiIes t5at &ons&ri(tion .o"ld yield a (oorer-1"ality for&e.7 Retired 'aJ. :en. Ted 2tro"(A former Army de("ty &5ief of staff for (ersonnelA says t5at a draft mig5t deliver t5e re1"ired 1"antityA B-"t yo" .o"ldn+t get t5e 1"ality or t5e staying (o.er t5at yo" also need.C7).7*
Cal 2k6-7
Draftees are younger destroys readiness Office of t"e #ndersecretary of Defense ?6ersonnel and Readiness@A $%%& ?BCons&ri(tion T5reatens Hard-7on A&5ievements
and 'ilitary ReadinessC 5tt(D//....defenselink.mil/ne.s/>an233 /d233 311)avf.(df@ 2. Draftees also are less likely to reenlist. D"ring t5e !ietnam eraA only 13 (er&ent of draftees ele&ted to reenlist. #e&a"se of t5e ty(i&al (attern of individ"als to serve only one s5ort termA a &ons&ri(ted for&e m"st -e &onsidera-ly larger t5an a vol"nteer for&e. ="rt5erA o.ing to t5e (a"&ity of reenlistmentsA a draft for&e .o"ld -e yo"nger and less e<(erien&edA .5i&5 5as a &5illing effe&t on Jo- (erforman&e and (ersonnel readiness.
Volunteers !etter stay longer- more com,etent and smarter #et5 Asc"A senior e&onomist at RANDA 2///$%%&
?B25o"ld Fn&le 2am 7ant Ko"LC 5tt(D//....rand.org/&ommentary/323/3 #:.5tml@ #"t -y a n"m-er of 5istori&al meas"resA t5e all-vol"nteer for&e 5as advantages over a military filled .it5 large n"m-ers of draftees. A&&ording to estimates made -y Clemson Fniversity (rofessor >o5n 7arnerA t5e average re&r"it today stays in t5e military a-o"t t.o years longer t5an did t5e average re&r"it in t5e early 1/73s. 9o.er t"rnover res"lts in a more e<(erien&ed &areer for&e. 2"&5 e<(erien&e is in&reasingly im(ortant as military o(erations -e&ome more 5ig5-te&5. !ol"nteers are also more likely to seek advan&ementA and so are likely to -e more motivated t5an draftees. 8n additionA -e&a"se vol"nteers are (aid more and &annot -e re(la&ed at .illA t5ere is a stronger in&entive to "se t5em e&onomi&allyA .it5 an em(5asis on 5ig5-a(tit"de (ersonnel. TodayMs vol"nteer for&e is t5erefore more ed"&ated t5an t5e general (o("lation -- more t5an /3 (er&ent of ne. re&r"its 5ave a 5ig5 s&5ool di(lomaA &om(ared .it5 only 7* (er&ent of t5e yo"t5 (o("lation. And a-o"t 67 (er&ent of ne. mem-ers of t5e military s&ore 5ig5 on t5e a(tit"de test "sed for re&r"itmentA &om(ared .it5 only *3 (er&ent of t5e general (o("lation . T5ese attri-"tes 5ave translated into faster training times and 5ig5er (erforman&e.
+ore com,etent less disci,linary ,ro!lems C5risto(5er .e"n- assistant se& def of for&e management and (ersonnelA $%%$
?5tt(D//....e&onli-.org/li-rary/0n&/Cons&ri(tion.5tml@ F.2. e<(erien&e sin&e t5e end of t5e draft in 1/7 validates all t5ese arg"ments. 'ilitary (ersonnel in t5e early nineties are t5e 5ig5est 1"ality in t5e nationMs 5istory. Re&r"its are -etter ed"&ated and s&ore 5ig5er on enlistment tests t5an t5eir draft-era &o"nter(arts. 8n 1//3A /* (er&ent of ne. re&r"its .ere 5ig5 s&5ool grad"atesA &om(ared to a-o"t 73 (er&ent in t5e draft era . ="lly /7 (er&ent s&ored average or a-ove on t5e Armed =or&es ;"alifi&ation TestA &om(ared to ,3 (er&ent d"ring t5e draft era. #e&a"se of t5at and -e&a"se servi&e mem-ers are all vol"nteersA t5e military 5as far fe.er dis&i(line (ro-lemsA greater e<(erien&e ?-e&a"se of less t"rnover@A and 5en&e more &a(a-ility. 2oA for e<am(leA dis&i(line ratesNnonJ"di&ial ("nis5ment and &o"rts-martialNare do.n from 1,) (er 1A333 in 1/72 to J"st 76 (er 1A333 in 1//3A and more t5an 5alf of todayMs for&e are &areeristsN(eo(le .it5 more t5an five yearsM e<(erien&eNas &om(ared to only a-o"t one-t5ird in t5e fifties and si<ties.
Cal 2k6-7
Draft "urts morale creates tension !et(een draftees and career soldiers Re(. Ron 1aul- $%%2 ?5tt(D//....de-ate-&entral.org/resear&5/a-draft-violates-individ"al-li-erty@
A draft .eakens t5e military -y introd"&ing tensions and rivalries -et.een t5ose .5o vol"nteer for military servi&e and t5ose .5o 5ave -een &ons&ri(ted. T5is "ndermines t5e &o5esiveness of military "nitsA .5i&5 is a vital element of military effe&tiveness. Cons&ri(ts also are "nlikely to &5oose t5e military as a &areerG t5"sA a draft .ill do little to address (ro-lems .it5 retention. 7it5 todayMs 5ig5-te&5 militaryA retention is t5e most im(ortant (ersonnel iss"e and it seems &o"nter-(rod"&tive to ado(t any (oli&y t5at .ill not address t5is im(ortant iss"e.
Draft fails destroys co"esion Bando( )**/ ?Do"gA 2enior =ello. H Cato 8nstit"teA B=i<ing 75at Ain+t #rokeA T5e Rene.ed Call for Cons&ri(tionA 6oli&y
Analysis No. *1 A"g"st 1A 1///@ T5e res"lt of a rene.ed draft .o"ld -e to s"-stit"te some (eo(le .5o do not .ant to serve for some .5o do. Reinstit"ting &ons&ri(tion .o"ld add to t5e armed servi&es a fe. -rig5ter soldiers along .it5 many .5o .ere less -rig5t. T5e draft .o"ld -e so&ially disr"(tive and e&onomi&ally &ostlyG it .o"ld 5arm military &o5esionA dis&i(lineA and retention. =inallyA &ons&ri(tion .o"ld -e grossly "nfair to t5e fe. 1,-year-olds .5o fo"nd t5emselves "n.illingly in "niform .5ile a vast maJority of t5eir &om(atriots .ent a-o"t t5eir lives as -efore.
Cal 2k6-7
an9t train draftees in time (ill destroy readiness in t"e long term
2&ott Ritter- former FN C5ief 7ea(ons 8ns(e&torA )/27/$%%2 ?5tt(D//....alternet.org/.ireta(/ **17/@ D: 7o"ld yo" s"((ort a draftA like C5arles Rangel ?D-NK@ is doingL 5R: NoA -e&a"se Rangel is s"((orting a draft for (oliti&al reasons. To me t5e military is a-o"t national defenseA national se&"rityA and o"r military today is e1"i((ed .it5 some of t5e finest te&5nology t5e .orldMs ever seen. 8tMs 5orri-le te&5nologyA -"t from a military (ers(e&tiveA itMs good st"ff. 8t re1"ires a lot of training. 75en yo" talk a-o"t &ons&ri(ting (eo(leA yo"Mre talking a-o"t .5atA a t.o-year termL Ko" &anMt even train a good infantryman in t.o yearsA and so 8 .o"ldnMt -e in favor of a draft -e&a"se it t"rns o"r military it d"m-s it do.n. 8 kno. .5ere Rangel is &oming fromA -"t seeA .5y is it yo" 5ave to 5ave a son or da"g5ter in t5e military -efore yo" &are a-o"t t5e men and .omen in t5e militaryL 7e s5o"ld get Ameri&ans to "nderstand t5at Pt5isQ is o"r militaryA every man and .oman in t5at military -elongs to "s. 8tMs o"r res(onsi-ility. T5ey donMt 5ave to -e o"r sonsA o"r da"g5tersA o"r -rot5ersA o"r sistersA o"r &o"sinsA o"r relativesA o"r friends -- t5eyMre Ameri&ans. 2o .e s5o"ld 5ave o.ners5i( of t5ese (eo(leA and .e s5o"ldnMt allo. t5em to go o"t and die in a &a"se t5atMs not .ort5y of t5e sa&rifi&e. 8 J"st t5ink itMs a &o(-o"t to say t5at .e 5ave to 5ave a draft -efore Ameri&a &ares. Ameri&a s5o"ld &are .it5o"t a draft.
Cal 2k6-7
Doesn9t matter volunteer force is !etter draft (on9t effect mo!ili<ation or recruitment Re(. Ron 1aul- $%%2 ?5tt(D//....de-ate-&entral.org/resear&5/a-draft-violates-individ"al-li-erty@
A Draft is Not Needed T5e De(artment of Defense 5as &onfirmed t5at &ons&ri(tion serves no military need. Defense offi&ials from -ot5 (arties 5ave re("diated it. 2e&retary of Defense Donald R"msfeld 5as statedA RT5e disadvantages of "sing &om("lsion to -ring into t5e armed for&es t5e men and .omen needed are nota-leAR .5ile 6resident 7illiam ClintonMs 2e&retary of t5e Army 9o"is CalderaA in a s(ee&5 -efore t5e National 6ress Cl"-A admitted t5atA RTodayA .it5 o"r smallerA (ost-Cold 7ar armed for&esA o"r stronger vol"nteer tradition and o"r need for longer terms of servi&e to get a good ret"rn on t5e 5ig5A "(front training &ostsA it .o"ld -e even 5arder to fas5ion a fair draft.R 8n fa&tA a De(artment of Defense re(ort stated t5at draft registration &o"ld -e eliminated R.it5 no effe&t on military mo-iliIation and no meas"ra-le effe&t on military re&r"itment.R TodayMs military is more 5ig5 te&5 and s(e&ialiIed t5an ever -eforeA and an ed"&ated vol"nteer for&e is re1"ired to o(erate o"r modern ArmyA NavyA and Air =or&e. 'ost military e<(erts -elieve a draft .o"ld a&t"ally im(air military readinessA des(ite t5e in&rease in ra. man(o.erA -e&a"se of training and morale (ro-lems.
Cal 2k6-7
4nsufficient time to train draftees =red 0a,lan- 2late &omm"nistA >"ly A $%%; ?BDon+t get &a"g5t in a draftAC C5i&ago 2"n-Times@
8t takes a-o"t si< mont5s to ("t a soldier t5ro"g5 -asi& training. 8t takes a fe. mont5s more to train one for a s(e&ialiIed skill. T5e kinds of &onfli&ts Ameri&an soldiers are likely to fa&e in t5e &oming de&ades .ill -e t5e kinds t5ey fa&e in 8ra1A Afg5anistanA 4osovo and #osnia -- Rse&"rity and sta-iliIation o(erationsAR in military (arlan&e. T5ese kinds of o(erations re1"ire more training t5an firing a rifleA driving a tank or dro((ing a -om-. 8f &ons&ri(tion is revivedA draftees are not likely to serve more t5an t.o years. Rig5t no.A t5e average vol"nteer in t5e F.2. armed for&es 5as served five years. #y most meas"resA an Army of draftees .o"ld -e generally less effe&tive t5an an Army of vol"nteers. T5eir task is too vital to tolerate s"&5 a sa&rifi&e for t5e &a"se of so&ial J"sti&e.
5'ill out(eig"s num!ers Tim 0aneA #radley =ello. 9a-or 6oli&y Center for Data Analysis Heritage =o"ndationA Noverm-er 7A $%%= ?B75o #ears t5e
#"rdenAC Heritage =o"ndation Center for Data and AnalysisA 1@ T5e &ari&at"re of &ons&ri(tion -- a 5ars5 reality of 0"ro(ean militaries in t5e 1,t5 and 1/t5 &ent"ries -- lives on in t5e (o("lar imaginationA -"t it does not a&&"rately re(resent t5e all-vol"nteer F.2. military. 8ndeedA t5e F.2. militaryMs 1"alitative s"(eriority is .5at makes it t5e most effi&ient and let5al &om-at for&e in 5istory. 8n e&onomi& termsA 5ig5-skill 5"man &a(ital among troo(s makes t5e military more (rod"&tive overall. T5ere may -e legitimate e1"ity &on&erns t5at o"t.eig5 national se&"rityA -"t t5ey .ill "ndo"-tedly &ome at a &ost or trade-off in (rod"&tivity.
Cal 2k6-7
Cal 2k6-7
+ore troo,s trades off (it" e>ui,ment and tec" Dr. >ames arafano- senior resear&5 fello. H HeritageA $%%= ?5tt(D//....5eritage.org/Resear&5/HomelandDefense/t5e-long-.ar&51.&fm@ Dum! 4dea No. &D Add +ore Troo,s. 6ermanently s.elling t5e ranks of t5e military -y tens of t5o"sands is not t5e ans.er. 6ermanent in&reases -ring all t5e -aggage of a 23-year &areerG -ig-ti&ket items like 5o"singA medi&al &areA and retirement. 75en 8ra1 ram(s do.nA t5e armed for&es .ill 5ave more troo(s t5an t5ey need. 8f all t5ose troo(s .ere Breg"larsAC t5e 6entagon .o"ld eit5er 5ave to kee( t5em all a-oardNs5o"ldering needless e<(enseNor la"n&5 a disr"(tive and &ostly do.nsiIing. Too large a military .ill take "s rig5t -a&k to t5e 5ollo. for&eA .it5 too fe. reso"r&es to trainA e1"i(A and em(loy t5e availa-le troo(s.
13
Cal 2k6-7
11
Cal 2k6-7
A/T Overstretc"
Overstretc" eAaggerated #5 not at t"reat from Russia anymore Bando( 9** ?Do"gA 2enior =ello. H Cato 8nstit"teA B=i<ing 75at Ain+t #rokeA T5e Rene.ed Call for Cons&ri(tionA 6oli&y Analysis
No. *1 A"g"st 1A 1///@ 0ven 7as5ington+s more serio"s &ommitments are no arg"ment for &ons&ri(tion. =or e<am(leA t5e Fnited 2tates maintains 133A333 soldiers in 0"ro(e to defend against (5antom divisions of t5e Red Army. #ritainA =ran&eA and :ermany toget5er s(end more on t5e military t5an does R"ssia. >a(an is t5e se&ond-ranking glo-al e&onomi& (o.er and fa&es no serio"s se&"rity t5reatsG 2o"t5 4orea (ossesses nearly 3 times t5e :D6 of its &omm"nist Nort5 4orean antagonist. 8t is 5ard to make a serio"s arg"ment on t5e -asis of national interest for t5e (resen&e of any F.2. troo(s in t5ose regionsNes(e&ially a (resen&e (rovided -y a draft.
12
Cal 2k6-7
6A,erts agree don9t need draft to ma'e u, ,ersonnel s"ortfall 5tevens =-)B-$%%2 ?F.2. 20NAT%R T0D 2T0!0N2 ?R-A4@A CHA8R'ANA F.2. 20NAT%R T0D 2T0!0N2 ?R-A4@ H%9D2 A
H0AR8N: %N =82CA9 K0AR 2337 A66R%6R8AT8%N2 =%R TH0 D06ART'0NT %= D0=0N20 =DCH 6oliti&al Trans&ri(ts 'ay 17A 2336 7ednesday@ D%R:AND 'r. 2e&retaryA .eMre stret&5ed (retty t5in in a range of areas -- National :"ard and ot5er areas. Do yo" foresee any &ir&"mstan&e "nder .5i&5 in t5e f"t"re t5e se&retary of defense .ill re&ommend t5e reinstit"tion of a military draftL R#+536/DD 8 5ate to ans.er t5e se&ond (art firstA -"t 8 .ill. T"e ans(er is flat no. 7e donMt need a draft. 8 .o"ld -e 5armf"l to reinstit"te a draft. 7e 5ave a &o"ntry of -- .5atL -- &lose to 33 million (eo(leA and .e 5ave an a&tive d"ty for&e of 1.) million and :"ard and Reserve of anot5er )*3A333. And all .e need to do is .5at anyone else .it5 a vol"nteer entity 5as to doA and t5atMs adJ"st t5e in&entives so t5at yo" &an attra&t and retain t5e (eo(le yo" need and 5ave to 5ave to defend t5is &o"ntry. And t5ank t5e good 9ord t5ere are (lenty of (eo(le ("tting t5eir 5ands "( and vol"nteering to do t5atA even t5o"g5 &o"ld (ossi-ly -e in a safer (osition or a more &omforta-le (ositionA and t5eyMre doing it.
Cal 2k6-7
1)
Cal 2k6-7
1*
Cal 2k6-7
16
Cal 2k6-7
NO R450 O3 O336N56 ON/7 A R450 THAT O #1AT4ON ONT4N#65 TO 86T COR56 THR66 R6A5ON5 TO 1#// O#T NOC 9ynn Coolsey and #ar-ara /eeG Co-C5airs of t5e Congressional 6rogressive Ca"&"sG 2/6/ %2G T5e NationG 5tt(D//....t5enation.&om/do&/23363236/.oolsey
7it5 t5e offi&ial &ase for .ar long sin&e discreditedA t5e 5"man and e&onomi& &osts mo"nting and eviden&e gro.ing t5at t5e #"s5 AdministrationMs Rstay t5e &o"rseR (oli&y may kee( "s t5ere indefinitelyA it 5as never -een &learer t5at t5e .ar in 8ra1 is a moral and functional failure. H"man de&en&yA fis&al sanity and national se&"rity demand t5at .e move 1"i&kly to -ring o"r soldiers 5ome. T5e ins"rgen&y .ill never -e 1"elled as long as Ameri&an troo(s are in 8ra1. 8tMs t5e o&&"(ation t5at gave rise to t5e ins"rgen&y in t5e first (la&e. 6very day t5at F2 -oots are on 8ra1i soilA militant anti-Ameri&anism intensifies and more ins"rgents are &reated. As one Ameri&an offi&er in 8ra1 -l"ntly ("t itD R7e &anMt kill t5em all. 75en 8 kill oneA 8 &reate t5ree.R
17
Cal 2k6-7
TH6 O #1AT4ON AN9T C4N B6 A#56 4T9// N6V6R C4N TH6 5#NN45 Tom HaydenD Carey '&7illiams =ello. at t5e Nation 8nstit"te and former California 2tate 2enatorG 1/13/ $%%2G T5e NationG
5tt(D//....t5enation.&om/do&/2336312 /5ayden T5e notion t5at t5e Ameri&an military o&&"(ation &an silen&e t5e armed resistan&eA 8 .as toldA is arrogant folly. T5e &laim t5at t5e 2"nni minority is too small to defy t5e 25iite-4"rdis5 maJority is t5e (remise of t5e o&&"(ation. #"t s"rveys s5o. t5at t.o-t5irds of 8ra1is favor a near-term F2 .it5dra.al. 'any 25iitesA like t5e re-ellio"s follo.ers of '"1tada al-2adrA are Ara-A not 6ersianA and favor a "nified 8ra1. 8n additionA t5e 2"nni minority .ill -e s"((lemented -y 2"nnis from neig5-oring &o"ntries if t5eir e<isten&e is t5reatened. As one former >ordanian ministerA '"nt5er HaddadinA told meA RT5e 2"nnis are not really a minority -e&a"se t5e Ara- 9eag"e is t5eir &o"nter.eig5t to 8ran.R
#5 troo, increase only strengt"ens t"e insurgency can9t solve Re,. 'artin +ee"an- $%%=?5tt(D//....5o"se.gov/mee5an/ira1.5ite(a(er.5tm@
As t5e F.2. troo( level 5as in&reasedA t5e ins"rgen&y 5as strengt5ened. #y all meas"resA t5e ins"rgen&y 5as only gained in strengt5 and deadliness in t5e (ast year. D"ring t5at same time (eriod t5e F2 troo( (resen&e 5as in&reased from its lo. of a-o"t 11*A333 in =e-r"ary 233) to 1),A333 today.iPviiiQ =atal atta&ks on F.2. troo(s 5ave in&reased from an average of 1 (er mont5 d"ring t5e se&ond 5alf of 233 A to *2 (er mont5 d"ring t5e first 5alf of 233)A to 6/ (er mont5 d"ring t5e se&ond 5alf of 233). iiPi<Q T5e n"m-er of troo(s .o"nded in a&tion 5as in&reased as .ellA from an average of 27, (er mont5 d"ring t5e se&ond 5alf of 233 A to )/7 (er mont5 d"ring t5e first 5alf of 233)A to 76* (er mont5 d"ring t5e se&ond 5alf of 233).iiiP<Q Atta&ks on key infrastr"&t"re also in&reased over t5at (eriod of time.ivP<iQ 6entagon estimates of t5e n"m-er of 8ra1i ins"rgents 5ave 1"adr"(led from *A333 a year ago to 23A333 today.vP<iiQ T5e de("ty &ommander of Coalition for&esA #ritis5 'aJ. :en. Andre. :ra5amA 5as estimated t5at t5ere are )3A333 to *3A333 a&tive ins"rgent fig5ters.viP<iiiQ A&&ording to inde(endent analystsA t5e ins"rgen&y also dra.s strengt5 from (art-time fig5ters and &riti&al s"((ort ?-ot5 a&tive and (assive@ from &ivilians. viiP<ivQ 8ra1+s 8ntelligen&e 'inister estimates t5ere to -e )3A333 B5ard &oreC ins"rgents .it5 a s"((ort net.ork of 233A333 8ra1is. viiiP<vQ 'ost estimates ("t t5e &ore ins"rgen&y in t5e 23A333 to )3A333 (erson range .it5 a s"((ort net.ork in t5e 133A333 to 233A333 range.i<P<viQ
1,
Cal 2k6-7
Nuclear deterrence c"ec's Ted ar,enter- !6 of Defense 2t"dies H CAT%- )/$;/$%%2 ?Baltimore 5un- leAisE
AdmittedlyA t5e advent of 'r. A5madineJad makes t5at o(tion more nerve-.ra&king. 8t is .ort5 remem-eringA t5o"g5A t5at 4ranFs (oliti&al system is fairly diff"se and t5at 'r. A5madineJad is only one a&tor among many. 8ndeedA des(ite 5is lofty title of (residentA 5e 5ad to s"-mit several &andidates -efore 5e ind"&ed t5e (arliament to a((rove 5is nominee for oil minister. 4ran- "nder 'r. A5madineJadA is not a tig5tly &entraliIed system like :ermany "nder Hitler and t5e 2oviet Fnion "nder 2talinA .5ere one manMs de&ision &o"ld (l"nge t5e nation into .ar. 7as5ingtonMs e<(erien&e .it5 "ina in t5e 1/63s and early 1/73s is (er5a(s even more (ertinent. "ina -e&ame a n"&lear (o.er "nder 'ao Tse-t"ngA a leader .5ose vie.s on n"&lear .arfare .ere alarming in t5e e<treme. His -oast t5at "ina &o"ld o"tlast t5e Fnited 2tates in a n"&lear .ar of attrition so alarmed "inaFs allyA 'os&o.A t5at 2oviet leaders 5astened to ass"re t5eir F.2. &o"nter(arts t5at s"&5 t5inking in no .ay refle&ted t5e 4remlinMs vie.s. "ina also emerged as a n"&lear (o.er on t5e eve of t5e C"lt"ral Revol"tion. "ina d"ring t5at orgasm of fanati&ism makes todayMs 4ran look like a normalA even sedateA &o"ntry. F.2. (oli&ymakers .ere "nderstanda-ly very "neasy a-o"t "ina Joining t5e ranks of n"&lear .ea(ons states. Ket t5ey reJe&ted t5e advi&e of t5ose inside and o"tside government .5o advo&ated military a&tion to take o"t #eiJingMs n"&lear (rogram. :iven t5e &onstr"&tive &5anges t5at 5ave taken (la&e in "ina in t5e (ast t5ree de&adesA 5istory 5as vindi&ated a (oli&y of restraint. A similar (oli&y of &a"tion and deterren&e may also (ay off .it5 4ran. 8t is not an easy or &omforta-le &o"rse to advo&ate. 8t is merely more realisti& and less dangero"s t5an t5e ot5er availa-le o(tions.
1/
Cal 2k6-7
#174N8 4RAH 3OR 5 TH6 O//454O O#R56 C4TH 4RAN turns t"e 4ran add on
6eter 8al!rait"G senior di(lomati& fello. at t5e Center for Arms Control and Non-6roliferationG ///%2G Ne. Kork Revie. of #ooksG 5tt(D//....ny-ooks.&om/arti&les/1,771
7it5 t5e F2 Army vastly overe<tended in 8ra1 and 8ranMs friends in (o.er in #ag5dadA t5e 8ranians a((arently feel &onfident t5at t5e Fnited 2tates .ill take no a&tion to sto( t5em if t5ey try to make a n"&lear .ea(on. T5is is only one little-noti&ed &onse1"en&e of Ameri&aMs fail"re in 8ra1. 7e invaded 8ra1 to (rote&t o"rselves against none<istent 7'Ds and to (romote demo&ra&y. Demo&ra&y in 8ra1 -ro"g5t to (o.er 8ranMs alliesA .5o are in a (osition to ignite an "(rising against Ameri&an troo(s t5at .o"ld make t5e &"rrent (ro-lems .it5 t5e 2"nni ins"rgen&y seem insignifi&ant. 8ranA in effe&tA 5olds t5e F2 5ostage in 8ra1A and as a &onse1"en&e .e 5ave no good military or nonmilitary o(tions in dealing .it5 t5e (ro-lem of 8ranMs n"&lear fa&ilities. Fnlike t5e 1/7/ 5ostage &risisA .e did t5is to o"rselves.
23
Cal 2k6-7
Des(ite vast &5anges in 2eo"l and 6yongyangA &old .ar t5inking still dominates t5e F.2. a((roa&5 to 4orea. To J"stify t5e &ontin"ed (resen&e of 7A333 F.2. troo(s and t5e sale of -illions of dollars .ort5 of F.2. .ea(ons in 4oreaA t5e 6entagon 5as &onsistently overestimated t5e military t5reat from Nort5 4orea. D"ring a visit to 2eo"l in >an"ary 1//,A F.2. Defense 2e&retary 7illiam Co5en .arned t5e finan&ially stra((ed 4orean government not to delay ("r&5ases of over S1 -illion .ort5 of F.2. air&raft and .ea(ons. To do soA 5e saidA R.o"ld send t5e .rong signal and en5an&e and es&alate tension on t5e 4orean 6enins"la.R T5e standoff -et.een Nort5 and 2o"t5 is indeed dangero"sA and t5e F.2. military 5as an im(ortant role to (lay as t5e t.o sides move to.ard ra((ro&5ement. #"t Nort5 4orea is not t5e only fa&tor in F.2. (oli&yG F.2. troo(s in 4orea are also (art of 7as5ingtonMs for.ard de(loyment in Asia and t5e defense of >a(an.
21
Cal 2k6-7
A/T +R 5cenario
+R "ig" no( no ris' of decline a draft reverses t"e trust 4aren 8utteri- Asst. 6rofessor of National 2e&"rity Affairs H Naval 6ost :rad"ate 2&5oolA $%%& ?2trategi& 8nsig5ts 'agaIineA
5tt(D//....&&&.n(s.navy.mil/(eo(le/g"ttieri.as(@ T5e relations5i( -et.een t5e military and t5e Ameri&an (eo(le 5as -een (rofo"ndly altered -y t5e events of 2e(tem-er 2331. ConsiderA for e<am(leA t5at in 1/7*A J"st after t5e end of t5e !ietnam 7arA .5en Ameri&ans aged eig5teen to t.enty-nine .ere asked 5o. m"&5 &onfiden&e t5ey 5ad in t5e (eo(le .5o ran t5e militaryA a mere t.enty (er&ent said Ra great deal.R 8n &ontrastA a 'ar&5 233 (oll of &ollege "ndergrad"ates fo"nd seventy-five (er&ent tr"sted t5e military Rall of t5e timeR or Rmost of t5e timeR to Rdo t5e rig5t t5ing.RP,Q T5is &5ange may -e d"e to a variety of fa&torsA s"&5 as t5e elimination of t5e draftA military s"&&ess in t5e first :"lf 7arA and (ositive (ortrayals of t5e military t5ro"g5 marketing and in Holly.ood films. 'ore favora-le attit"des may also refle&t rene.ed (atriotism andA sin&e .e .ere atta&ked at 5omeA a (er&e(tion t5at t5e military is .orking to avenge t5e dead and (revent anot5er //11 ?as in Afg5anistan and 8ra1@. As 6eter =eaver so elo1"ently ("t itA 5eig5tened fear gives rise to a Rmore (ersonal &onne&tion to t5e mission of t5e military.RP/Q
22
Cal 2k6-7
Aff claims are (ay off not racist or discriminatory at all enter for +ilitary Readiness- $%%& ?5tt(D//....&mrlink.org/re&r"it.as(Ldo&8DO1,3@
T5at divisive t5eme .as e&5oed -y a n"m-er of li-eral &ommentators. Black Entertainment Television (BET) talk s5o. 5ost Tavis 2miley askedA B75at im(a&t does it 5ave on Ameri&a .5en most of t5e lives on t5e front line are lives t5at &ome from &omm"nities of &olorLC ?A#CN072.&omA >an. ,@ A&t"al fig"res &om(iled -y t5e De(artment of Defense t5oro"g5ly dis&redit t5at myt5. An 11-(age re(ort titled Cons&ri(tion T5reatens Hard-7on A&5ievements and 'ilitary Readiness set fort5 doIens of 5istori& and &"rrent fa&tsA in&l"ding t5e follo.ingD Contrary to t5e &5arge t5at minorities are more likely to -e&ome &om-at &as"altiesA t5e Defense De(artment re(orted t5at in t5e A!=A 5ig5-risk &om-at for&esA s"&5 as infantryA armored and artillery "nitsA are (rimarily filled .it5 .5ite soldiers. #la&ks tend to &5oose assignments in administrative and s"((ort "nitsA in&l"ding 2 W of medi&al and dental (ositions. D"ring t5e 1//1-/2 Persian Gulf WarA -la&ks made "( 23% of t5e 550,000 F.2. troo(s de(loyedA -"t a&&o"nted for 17W of t5e &om-at and non&om-at deat5s. Contrary to t5e B"r-an legendC t5at vol"nteer soldiers are largely B(oor and "ned"&atedAC -la&k re&r"its &losely (arallel t5eir re(resentation among t5e yo"t5 (o("lationA and most are 5ig5 s&5ool grad"ates .it5 a-ove-average a(tit"de. T5e A!= is a gen"inely BdiverseC instit"tion t5at re.ards merit and refle&ts t5e so&iety it (rote&ts.
Cal 2k6-7
2)
Cal 2k6-7
Re-enlistment distorts statistics =red 0a,lanA 2late &omm"nistA >"ly A $%%; ?@Don+t get &a"g5t in a draftAC C5i&ago 2"n-Times@
=or one t5ingA todayMs all-vol"nteer F.2. military is not nearly as (oor or as -la&k as it on&e .as. T5e most re&ent statisti&s from 2332 s5o. t5at 1,2A333 (eo(le enlisted in t5e F.2. military. %f t5ese re&r"itsA 16 (er&ent .ere -la&k. #y &om(arisonA -la&ks &onstit"ted 1) (er&ent of 1,-to-2)-year-olds in t5e F.2. (o("lation overall. 8n ot5er .ordsA yo"ng -la&k men and .omen are only slig5tly overre(resented among ne. enlistees. His(ani&s are "nder-re(resentedA &om(rising J"st 11 (er&ent of re&r"its &om(ared .it5 16 (er&ent of 1,-to-2)-year-olds. 9ooking at t5e military as a .5oleA not J"st at t5ose .5o signed "( in a single yearA -la&ks do re(resent a dis(ro(ortionate s5are -- 22 (er&ent of all F.2. armed for&es. #y &om(arisonA t5ey make "( 1 (er&ent of 1,-to-))-year-old &ivilians. T5e differen&e is t5at -la&ks re-enlist at a 5ig5er rate t5an .5ites. His(ani&s remain "nderre(resentedD 13 (er&ent of all armed for&es &om(ared .it5 1) (er&ent of 1,-to-))-year-old &ivilians.
2*
Cal 2k6-7
26
Cal 2k6-7
27
Cal 2k6-7
2,
Cal 2k6-7
2/
Cal 2k6-7
Cal 2k6-7
Cal 2k6-7
6conomy DA )N 5"ell
A. #ni>ueness 6conomy #, No(
K4N56RT 6videnceL
B. /in' onscri,tion distorts t"e free mar'et leads to s"ort and long term economic decline 4atarina 0eller- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H 2"s1"e5anna F.A 6an" 1outvaaraA De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of Helsinki and Andreas Cagener- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of !iennaA 'ar&5 $%%2 ?B'ilitary Draft and 0&onomi& :ro.t5 in %0CD
Co"ntriesCA ft(D//re(e&.iIa.org/Re60&/Dis&"ssion(a(er/d(2322.(df@ 0&onomi& t5eory (redi&ts t5at military &ons&ri(tion is asso&iated .it5 stati& ineffi&ien&ies as .ell as .it5 dynami& distortions of t5e a&&"m"lation of 5"man and (5ysi&al &a(ital. Relative to an e&onomy .it5 an all-vol"nteer for&eA o"t("t levels and gro.t5 rates are e<(e&ted to -e lo.er in &o"ntries t5at rely on military draft to re&r"it t5eir army (ersonnel . =or %0CD &o"ntriesA .e s5o. t5at military &ons&ri(tion indeed 5as a statistically significant negative im,act on e&onomi& (erforman&e. T5"sA t5e losses in individ"al lifetime earningsA .5i&5 a n"m-er of mi&roe&onometri& st"dies o-serve for former &ons&ri(tsA indeed translate into s"-stantial red"&tions in in&ome and gro.t5 on t5e ma&roe&onomi& levelA rendering military &ons&ri(tion a so&ially "nne&essarily &ostly .ay of military re&r"itment. T5e res"lt t5at military &ons&ri(tion 5as a negative im(a&t on :D6 and on its gro.t5 is ro-"st in vario"s s(e&ifi&ations . 7e meas"red t5e im(a&t of &ons&ri(tion -y a d"mmy varia-leA -y t5e la-or for&e s5are of &ons&ri(tsA and -y t5e d"ration of &ons&ri(tion or of alternative servi&e. 7it5 all t5ese varia-lesA &ons&ri(tion 5as a &onsistently negative and "s"ally statisti&ally signifi&ant effe&t. T5e varia-le military e<(enses as s"&5 even varies in sign. 75en RTD is omitted t5e military varia-les added to t5e 'anki. et al. ?1//2@ are almost al.ays of even stronger signifi&an&e at t5e 1 or * (er&ent levels. T5e &oeffi&ients are generally of similar magnit"de also in smaller sam(les .5en (otential o"tliers are e<&l"ded or t5eir effe&ts diminis5ed. To &on&l"deA at least %0CD &o"ntries .o"ld -e ill advised to rely on military draft. T5is verdi&t is strengt5ened -y re&ent resear&5 on t5e (oliti&al virt"es .5i&5 its advo&ates tend to attri-"te to military &ons&ri(tion . 2"&5 (otential advantages in&l"de t5at military draft em-eds demo&rati& &ontrols in t5e army or red"&es t5e likeli5ood of .ar. Ho.everA analyIing militariIed interstate dis("tes from 1,,6 to 1//2A C5oi and >ames ?233 @ find t5at a military man(o.er system .it5 &ons&ri(ted soldiers is asso&iated .it5 more military dis("tes t5an (rofessional or vol"ntary armies. 5 Hen&eA in addition to an in&rease in ann"al :D6 gro.t5 of -et.een a 1"arter and 5alf a (er&entage (oint .5i&5 .e find an average %0CD &o"ntry .it5 military draft foregoesA a-olis5ing &ons&ri(tion even seems to go along .it5 a (ea&e dividend.
Cal 2k6-7
)N Huality /in'
Draft misallocates economic resources and destroys t"e #5 economy C5risto(5er .e"n- assistant se& def of for&e management and (ersonnelA $%%$
?5tt(D//....e&onli-.org/li-rary/0n&/Cons&ri(tion.5tml@ 'ost nationsA in&l"ding t5e Fnited 2tatesA 5ave "sed military drafts at vario"s times in t5eir 5istories. Regardless of oneMs vie.s on military or defense (oli&yA a draft 5as many e&onomi& as(e&ts t5at are in5erently "nfair ?and ineffi&ient@ and re("gnant to most e&onomists. Hen&eA t5e 1"estion of .5et5er to 5ave a draft is .5et5er any e<(e&ted -enefits o"t.eig5 t5ose ine1"ities. A military draft for&es (eo(le to do somet5ing t5ey .o"ld not ne&essarily &5ooseNserve in t5e military. 7it5 a draft in (la&eA t5e military &an (ay lo.er .ages t5an it .o"ld need to raise a for&e of .illing vol"nteers of t5e same siIeA skillsA and 1"ality. T5is red"&tion in (ay is (ro(erly vie.ed as a ta< on military (ersonnel. T5e amo"nt of t5e ta< is sim(ly t5e differen&e -et.een a&t"al (ay and t5e (ay ne&essary to ind"&e individ"als to serve vol"ntarily. 8fA for e<am(leA (ay .o"ld 5ave to -e S1*A333 (er year to attra&t s"ffi&ient vol"nteersA -"t t5ese vol"nteers are instead drafted at S7A333 (er yearA t5e draftees (ay a ta< of S,A333 (er year ea&5. #efore t5e draft .as a-olis5ed in t5e seventies some of its s"((orters arg"ed t5at an all-vol"nteer for&e .o"ld -e too e<(ensive -e&a"se t5e military .o"ld 5ave to (ay m"&5 5ig5er .ages to attra&t enlistees. #"t t5e draft does not really red"&e t5e &ost of national defense. 8nsteadA t5e draft s5ifts (art of t5e &ost from t5e general ("-li& to J"nior military (ersonnel ?&areer (ersonnel are not ty(i&ally drafted@. T5is ta< is es(e&ially regressiveD it falls on lo.-(aid J"nior (ersonnel .5o are least a-le to (ay. 'oreoverA t5e ta< is (aid not J"st -y drafteesA -"t also -y t5ose .5o still vol"nteer des(ite t5e lo.er (ay. 8n ot5er .ordsA it is a ta< on military servi&eA t5e very a&t of (atriotism t5at a draft is sometimes said to en&o"rage. T5e 6residentMs Commission on an All-!ol"nteer =or&e estimated t5at t5e draft ta< d"ring t5e !ietnam 7ar .as over S6 -illion (er year in 1//1 dollars. 0very time a draft 5as -een im(osedA t5e res"lt 5as -een lo.er military (ay. #"t even in t5e "nlikely event t5at military (ay is not red"&edA a draft .o"ld for&e some "n.illing (eo(le to serve in order to a&5ieve Rre(resentativenessAR or Re1"ity.R 8n re&ent yearsA for e<am(leA some 5ave advo&ated a ret"rn to &ons&ri(tion -e&a"se todayMs all-vol"nteer for&e s"((osedly 5as too fe. &ollege grad"ates or too many -la&ks. Ho. to de&ide .5i&5 of todayMs vol"nteers to t"rn a.ay is never addressed. T5e "n.illing &ons&ri(ts .5o re(la&e t5e .illing vol"nteers .o"ld -ear a ta< t5at no one -ears in an all-vol"nteer for&e. #e&a"se t5ese &ons&ri(ts do not ne&essarily (erform -etter t5an t5e vol"nteers t5ey dis(la&eA t5is ta< yields no Rreven"e.R #e&a"se t5e &ons&ri(ts are (art of so&ietyA t5e ta< t5ey (ay is sim(ly a .aste to t5e &o"ntry as a .5ole. And some .5o are 1"alified and .o"ld like to enlist are denied and for&ed into Jo-s for .5i&5 t5ey are less .ell s"ited or t5at offer less o((ort"nity. To make matters .orseA a draft also en&o"rages t5e government to mis"se reso"r&es. #e&a"se draftees and ot5er J"nior (ersonnel seem &5ea(er t5an t5ey a&t"ally areA t5e government may R-"yR more national defense t5an it s5o"ldA and .ill &ertainly "se (eo(leA es(e&ially 5ig5-skilled individ"als and J"nior (ersonnelA in greater n"m-ers t5an is effi&ient. T5is means t5at a given amo"nt of national defense is more &ostly to t5e &o"ntry t5an it need -e. 8n 1/,,A for e<am(leA t5e F.2. :eneral A&&o"nting %ffi&e ?:A%@ st"died t5e effe&ts of reinstit"ting &ons&ri(tion and &on&l"ded t5at an e1"ally effe&tive for&e "nder a draft .o"ld -e more e<(ensive t5an t5e &"rrent for&e. 7it5 a draft a larger total for&e .o"ld -e needed -e&a"se draftees serve a s5orter initial enlistment (eriod t5an todayMs vol"nteers. T5ereforeA a larger fra&tion of t5e for&e .o"ld -e involved in over5ead a&tivities s"&5 as trainingA s"(ervising less e<(erien&ed (ersonnelA and traveling to a first assignment. T5e :A% estimated t5is .o"ld add S2 -illion to S -illion (er year to t5e defense -"dget. A draft for&es some of t5e .rong (eo(le into t5e militaryN(eo(le .5o are more (rod"&tive in ot5er Jo-s or .5o 5ave a strong distaste for military servi&e. T5at 5as ot5er serio"s &onse1"en&es for t5e &o"ntryD t5e military and so&iety are -ot5 .eaker. 2o&iety is .eaker -e&a"se a draft inevita-ly &a"ses .astef"l avoidan&e -e5avior like t5e "n.anted s&5oolingA emigrationA early marriagesA and distorted &areer &5oi&es of t5e fifties and si<ties. T5e military is .eaker -e&a"se t5e (resen&e of "n.illing &ons&ri(ts in&reases t"rnover ?&ons&ri(ts reenlist at lo.er rates t5an vol"nteers@A lo.ers moraleA and &a"ses dis&i(line (ro-lems.
Cal 2k6-7
/in' - osts
Volunteer force c"ea,er draft !rea's t"e !an' and tan's t"e economy Office of t"e #ndersecretary of Defense ?6ersonnel and Readiness@A $%%& ?BCons&ri(tion T5reatens Hard-7on A&5ievements
and 'ilitary ReadinessC 5tt(D//....defenselink.mil/ne.s/>an233 /d233 311)avf.(df@ 'ore 0ffi&ient 8nvestmentsE T5e &ost-effe&tiveness of an A!= 5as -een reinfor&ed -y st"dies of t5e :A%A t5e (rivate se&torA and t5e De(artment. !irt"ally every revie. 5as &on&l"ded t5atA for a given level of for&e effe&tivenessA t5e A!= is less e<(ensive t5an &ons&ri(tion. T5ese &on&l"sions are driven -y t5ree fa&torsD 1. 7it5 a &ons&ri(ted for&e &omes 5ig5er (ersonnel t"rnoverA .5i&5 res"lts in s"-stantial &osts. 25orter enlistment termsA &5ara&teristi& of a draftA res"lt in 5ig5 (ersonnel t"rnover and a degradation in "nit sta-ility and (erforman&e . AlsoA 5ig5 t"rnover means more re&r"itsA and more re&r"its mean more s"(ervision and trainingG and more training means more trainers. As a res"ltA an in&reasing (ro(ortion of military reso"r&es are diverted from &ore readiness missions to s"((ort for military training. T5"sA training &osts .o"ld -e 5ig5er "nder &ons&ri(tion. Training &an -e fier&ely e<(ensive in a &ons&ri(ted for&e -e&a"se draftees .5o are assigned Jo-s re1"iring &om(le< skills need longer time for trainingA .5i&5 red"&es t5e time availa-le for (erforman&e in o(erational "nits. 2. Draftees also are less likely to reenlist. D"ring t5e !ietnam eraA only 13 (er&ent of draftees ele&ted to reenlist. #e&a"se of t5e ty(i&al (attern of individ"als to serve only one s5ort termA a &ons&ri(ted for&e m"st -e &onsidera-ly larger t5an a vol"nteer for&e. ="rt5erA o.ing to t5e (a"&ity of reenlistmentsA a draft for&e .o"ld -e yo"nger and less e<(erien&edA .5i&5 5as a &5illing effe&t on Jo- (erforman&e and (ersonnel readiness. . 7it5 a vol"nteer military &omes a more motivated for&e. Data s5o. t5at (eo(le (erform -etter if t5ey are tr"e vol"nteers t5an if t5ey are &oer&ed into military servi&e. T5e re&r"itment of vol"nteers also 5as res"lted in a 5ig5er 1"ality for&e as meas"red -y a(tit"de levels. T5is is note.ort5y -e&a"se a 5ig5 a(tit"de for&e is more easily trainedA (erforms -etterA and (resents fe.er dis&i(linary (ro-lems. 0m(iri&al eviden&e s5o.s t5at a 5ig5 1"ality and 5ig5ly motivated for&e is more (rod"&tive and less e<(ensive in t5e long r"n. ) ;"antifi&ation of &osts in order to &om(are a &ons&ri(ted for&e .it5 a vol"nteer for&e is not a trivial e<er&ise. Ho.everA analysts 5ave &on&l"ded t5atA &om(ared to an e1"ally effe&tive vol"nteer for&eA a draft .o"ld ?1@ red"&e e<(erien&e levelsA ?2@ in&rease t5e (er&entage of -ot5 non-5ig5 s&5ool grad"ates and lo.er a(tit"de individ"alsA ? @ in&rease a&&ession levelsA training loadsA and for&e siIeA and ?)@ 5ike -"dget &osts.
+ilitary draft creates "ig" costs and im,oses a conscri,tion taA #et5 Asc"A senior e&onomist at RANDA 2///$%%&
?B25o"ld Fn&le 2am 7ant Ko"LC 5tt(D//....rand.org/&ommentary/323/3 #:.5tml@ A vol"nteer for&e is also less &ostly t5an a draft for&e of t5e same siIe. A vol"nteer for&e .it5 its lo.er t"rnover rate re1"ires fe.er re(la&ementsA t5"s ena-ling t5e military to red"&e training &osts .5ile rea(ing a greater ret"rn on e<(ensive training. 8n 1/,,A t5e :eneral A&&o"nting %ffi&e &on&l"ded t5at an all-vol"nteer for&e is &5ea(er t5an a draft for&e -y more t5an S2.* -illon -- an amo"nt t5at .o"ld -e more t5an S) -illion in todayMs dollars. Cons&ri(tion makes sense .5en 5"ge n"m-ers of re&r"its are neededA relative to t5e (o("lation. #"t in t5e last t.o de&adesA military re&r"its .ereA at mostA only 1* (er&ent of t5e 1,-year-old (o("lation. Alt5o"g5 t5e (a&e of military o(erations 5as in&reasedA t5e man(o.er needed to &ond"&t a given ty(e of o(eration 5as de&lined o.ing to te&5nologi&al im(rovements. %n to( of t5isA t5e yo"t5 (o("lation is gro.ing. T5"sA t5ere is no reason t5e military .ill need a large (ortion of Ameri&an yo"t5 to serve in t5e foreseea-le f"t"re. Criti&s of a draft also say it is "nfair e&onomi&allyA for t.o reasons. =irstA it levies an im(li&it ta< on la-or -y for&ing some individ"als to serve rat5er t5an ("rs"e t5eir -etter &ivilian o((ort"nities. #e&a"se vol"nteers vie. military servi&e as t5eir -est o((ort"nityA t5ere is no im(li&it ta<. 2e&ondA it .o"ld de(rive t5ose no. serving of t5e militaryMs &om(etitive (ay and -enefits. T5e average level of F2 military (ay &"rrently e<&eeds t5e level t5at similar individ"als mig5t earn in t5e &ivilian e&onomy. T5is .as not al.ays so. 8n 1/73A t5ree years -efore t5e draft endedA entry-level military (ay .as a-o"t 5alf of &ivilian (ay. T5e F2 military 5as s5o.n over t5e (ast 3 years t5at is &a(a-le of filling its ranks -y relying solely on vol"nteers. T5e vol"nteers 5ave (erformed .ell and today make "( t5e most (o.erf"l and most effe&tive fig5ting for&e in t5e .orld. And no one is -eing for&ed into t5e military against 5is .ill.
Cal 2k6-7
75en a lo.er military entry .age is (aid to drafteesA t5e 2ervi&es .o"ld 5ave an in&entive to R5ireR too many individ"alsA instead of relying on more (rod"&tive alternatives s"&5 as t5e "se of more &areer (ersonnel or &om(lementary ne. &a(ital e1"i(ment. 75en t5at rise in a&&essions takes (la&eA t5e -"rden of national defense ?in terms of t5e la-or s"((ly .it5dra.n from t5e e&onomy@ is greater "nder a draft t5an "nder a vol"nteer for&e. Hilde-rand ("t it t5is .ayD RP#Qe&a"se military Mla-orM is E "nderval"edA t5e armed servi&es are given a false signal -y t5e (ri&e systemG t5ey are en&o"raged to "se la-or more intensively relative to &a(ital t5an is J"stified -y t5e real state of relative fa&tor endo.ments in t5e e&onomy as a .5ole. 8n &onse1"en&eA it (ays to 5oard la-orA to "se it .astef"llyA and to ado(t &a(ital-to-la-or ratios t5at are too lo.. T"rnover rates are also made too 5ig5A and t5ese add to re&r"itment &osts .5ile also lo.ering overall effi&ien&y.R
Draftees forgo o,,ortunity cost of ot"er ,ositions distorts ca,ital mar'ets and ,roductivity gro(t" tan's t"e economy 4atarina 0eller- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H 2"s1"e5anna F.A 6an" 1outvaaraA De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of Helsinki and Andreas Cagener- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of !iennaA 'ar&5 $%%2 ?B'ilitary Draft and 0&onomi& :ro.t5 in %0CD
Co"ntriesCA ft(D//re(e&.iIa.org/Re60&/Dis&"ssion(a(er/d(2322.(df@ Already Adam 2mit5 (resented a &lear &ase against &ons&ri(tion and fo"nd an Cirresisti-le s"(eriority .5i&5 a .ell-reg"lated standing POall-vol"nteerQ army 5as over a militia PO &ons&ri(tionQC ?2mit5 1/76 P1776QA (. 731@. Also laterA most e&onomists 5ave -een favoring (rofessional soldiers over &ons&ri(ted ones. T5ey arg"e t5atA in s(ite of its lo.er -"dgetary &ost for t5e governmentA a draft system im(oses larger o((ort"nity &osts on so&iety t5an an all-vol"nteer for&e. 'ost arg"ments in t5at dis&"ssion fo&"s on stati& ineffi&ien&ies from .5i&5 a draft system s"ffers ?Hansen and 7eis-rodA 1/67G =is5erA 1/6/G 9ee and '&4enIieA 1//2G 2andler and HartleyA 1//*A C5a(ter 6G 7arner and As&5A 2331@D T5e military draft im(oses o((ort"nity &osts on &ons&ri(ts. T5ey e<&eed t5e fis&al &osts -y t5e ma<im"m amo"nt draftees are .illing to (ay to avoid &om("lsory servi&e and &an -e meas"red -y t5e differen&e -et.een (otential market in&ome and t5e lo.er (ay d"ring t5e servi&e (l"s t5e (e&"niary val"e of t5e dis"tility from 5aving to .ork in an o&&"(ation and "nder &ir&"mstan&es t5at draftees ot5er.ise .o"ld not 5ave &5osen. 9argely ignoring t5e draftees+ (rod"&tivity differen&es and &om(arative advantagesA &ons&ri(tion involves an ineffi&ient mat&5 -et.een (eo(le and Jo-s andA t5"sA an avoida-le o"t("t loss. T5e a((arent &5ea(ness of draftee la-or leads to an e<&essive (ersonnel &a(ital ratio "nder &ons&ri(tion. 25orter (eriods of trainingA la&k of e<(erien&eA 5ig5er t"rnover rates and a-sen&e of motivation and in&entives im(ly lo.er la-or (rod"&tivity for draftees t5an for (rofessional soldiers. 7it5 a lo.er sto&k of 5"man and (5ysi&al &a(italA t5e level and t5e gro.t5 rate of national in&ome in an e&onomy tend to -e lo.er t5an .it5 an all-vol"nteer for&e. 2im"lations for a &om("tational general e1"ili-ri"m e&onomy -y 9a" et al. ?233)@ demonstrate t5at t5ese long-r"n &osts of t5e draft are siIea-leD 4f t"e ("ole ,o,ulation (as su!Iect to draft ?i.e.A every-ody 5as to s(end one year for military servi&e at t5e age of 1,@A long-run 8D1 (ould !e de,ressed !y u, to one ,ercent A relative to an identi&al e&onomy t5at 5as t5e same level of military o"t("t (rod"&ed in an ?e1"ally effi&ient@ all-vol"nteer army.
Cal 2k6-7
Destroys economy9s la!or force "uman ca,ital goes to (aste magnified in #5 due to "ig"-education economy 4atarina 0eller- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H 2"s1"e5anna F.A 6an" 1outvaaraA De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of Helsinki and Andreas Cagener- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of !iennaA 'ar&5 $%%2 ?B'ilitary Draft and 0&onomi& :ro.t5 in %0CD
Co"ntriesCA ft(D//re(e&.iIa.org/Re60&/Dis&"ssion(a(er/d(2322.(df@ As arg"ed -y 2tro"( and He&kelman ?2331@A t5e im(a&t of t5e military "se of an e&onomy+s la-or for&e on e&onomi& gro.t5 may -e non-linear and de(end on t5e overall 1"ality of 5"man &a(italD 7it5 5ig5er ed"&ational attainmentA t5e o((ort"nity &osts of dis(la&ing yo"ng men from t5e (rivate se&tor .orkfor&e to t5e military is 5ig5A resulting in reduced economic ,ros,erity . 7it5 lo. ed"&ational attainment of t5e yo"ng male .orkfor&eA s(ending a &ertain time in t5e military may indeed in&rease t5e 1"ality of 5"man &a(ital -y (roviding training o((ort"nitiesA e.g.A self-dis&i(lineA &omm"ni&ative skillsA or (ro-lem-solving te&5ni1"es. 2tro"( and He&kelman ?2331@ indeed find em(iri&al s"((ort for Afri&a and 9atin Ameri&a t5at recruitment to t"e military "as "ig"er and adverse effects on economic gro(t" in &o"ntries .it5 5ig5 ed"&ational standards. Ho.everA t5ey do not relate t5eir estimates to .5et5er t5e &o"ntries in 1"estion .ere r"nning (rofessional armies or "sed &ons&ri(tion.
Cal 2k6-7
Best model ,roves draft destroys economic gro(t" significantly 4atarina 0eller- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H 2"s1"e5anna F.A 6an" 1outvaaraA De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of Helsinki and Andreas Cagener- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of !iennaA 'ar&5 $%%2 ?B'ilitary Draft and 0&onomi& :ro.t5 in %0CD
Co"ntriesCA ft(D//re(e&.iIa.org/Re60&/Dis&"ssion(a(er/d(2322.(df@ %"r analysis s"ggests t5at military &ons&ri(tion im(a&ts negatively -ot5 t5e level and t5e gro.t5 of :D6 (er .orking-age (erson in %0CD &o"ntries. Ta-les 2 to ) re(ort %92 regression res"lts for in&ome levels. 0nfor&ing t5e military draft de,resses incomeA alt5o"g5 not signifi&antly so at &onventional levels. T5e n"m-er of &ons&ri(ts and t5e lengt5 of &ons&ri(tion s(ells 5ave statisti&ally 5ig5ly signifi&ant negative im(a&ts on :D6 ?at t5e 1 or * (er&ent levels@. T5e d"ration of alternative servi&e only s5o.s statisti&al signifi&an&e .5en inflation is given ?-"t at t5e 1 (er&ent level@. Ta-les * to 7 s5o. t5e res"lts of t5e gro.t5 regressions. R"nning a draft s&5eme t"rns o"t to 5am(er gro.t5 statisti&ally signifi&antly ?at t5e 13 or * (er&ent level@. As .it5 :D6 levelsA t5e s5are of &ons&ri(ts of t5e la-or for&e and t5e time s(ent in &ons&ri(tion 5ave statisti&ally signifi&ant negative effe&ts also on e&onomi& gro.t5. T5e &oeffi&ient on t5e &ons&ri(tion s5are of t5e la-or for&e is t5e largest in -ot5 t5e in&ome and gro.t5 regressions ?-22.1*1 in Ta-le *@. AgainA t5e lengt5 of alternative servi&e only e<5i-its a statisti&ally signifi&antly negative im(a&t .5en t5e effe&t of inflation is &ontrolled for. 8f t5e n"meri&al &ons&ri(tion varia-les ?i.e.A t5e s5are of &ons&ri(ts in t5e la-or for&eA t5e d"ration of military servi&e and t5e d"ration of alternative servi&e@ .ere individ"ally de&reased -y one standard deviation ?3.33/A 3.*/1A 3.,3 res(e&tively@A it .o"ld on average for an %0CD &o"ntry in&rease t5e log differen&e gro.t5 of :D6 (er .orking-age (erson over t5e )3-year time (eriod e<(loredA 1/63-2333A -y 1/.1,*A 13.6/6 and 11./*7 (er&entA res(e&tively ?or -y 3.),A 3.27 and 3. (er&ent yearlyA res(e&tively@. T5"sA t5e s5are of &ons&ri(ts in t5e la-or for&e 5as t5e largest im(a&tA follo.ed -y t5e d"ration of t5e military servi&e and t5e alternative servi&e. T5is &onforms to t5e int"ition t5at t5e more intensely &ons&ri(tion is enfor&edA t5e less effe&tive la-or is s(ent on endeavors more (rod"&tive to t5e e&onomyA and t5e lo.er are o"t("t and its gro.t5. %-serve t5atA d"e to t5e &onsidera-le magnit"des of standard deviations in o"r sam(leA t5e aforementioned red"&tions in draftrelated varia-les .o"ldA for 1"ite a n"m-er of &o"ntries .it5 &ons&ri(tionA render t5eir draft s&5eme virt"ally meaningless. 7eA t5"sA mig5t inter(ret o"r estimates of in&reases in :D6 gro.t5 rates -y -et.een 3.27 and 3.), (er&ent as lo.er -o"nds for t5e effe&ts of a-olis5ing military &ons&ri(tion entirely.
Cal 2k6-7
/in' 6m,irically
Draft 'ills t"e economy em,irics is on our side 4atarina 0eller- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H 2"s1"e5anna F.A 6an" 1outvaaraA De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of Helsinki and Andreas Cagener- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of !iennaA 'ar&5 $%%2 ?B'ilitary Draft and 0&onomi& :ro.t5 in %0CD
Co"ntriesCA ft(D//re(e&.iIa.org/Re60&/Dis&"ssion(a(er/d(2322.(df@ Des(ite t5is &lear verdi&t -y e&onomi& t5eoryA so far not m"&5 em(iri&al eviden&e 5as -een (rovided on t5e ?ma&roe&onomi&@ inferiority of a military draftA relative to an all-vol"nteer for&e. T5is (a(er esta-lis5es s"&5 eviden&eA at least for %0CD &o"ntries in t5e (eriod -et.een 1/63 and 2333. 7e em(iri&ally test N and &onfirm N t5e 5y(ot5esis t5atA &om(ared .it5 a (rofessional armyA military &ons&ri(tion eAerts negative and lasting im,acts on aggregate out,ut and gro(t" . 7e take as o"r starting (oint gro.t5 models -y 'anki. et al. ?1//2@ and Nonneman and !an5o"dt ?1//6@
6m,irically tan's economy germany ,roves 4atarina 0eller- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H 2"s1"e5anna F.A 6an" 1outvaaraA De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of Helsinki and Andreas Cagener- De(artment of 0&onomi&s H F. of !iennaA 'ar&5 $%%2 ?B'ilitary Draft and 0&onomi& :ro.t5 in %0CD
Co"ntriesCA ft(D//re(e&.iIa.org/Re60&/Dis&"ssion(a(er/d(2322.(df@ !irt"ally all em(iri&al st"dies fo&"s on t5e stati& effi&ien&y losses of a draft system. T5ese losses seem to -e 1"ite siIea-leD 4erstens and 'eyermans ?1// @ estimate t5at t5e so&ial &ost of t5e ?no. a-olis5ed@ #elgian draft system amo"nted to t.i&e t5e -"dgetary &ost. 9"tI ?1//6@ revie.s several st"dies and re(orts t5at t5e ann"al o((ort"nity &ost of &ons&ri(tion in t5e :erman army is -et.een 2.2 and 6.7 -illion e"ros
Cal 2k6-7
Cal 2k6-7
)3
Cal 2k6-7
N6C 7OR0 T4+65D $/$G/%2D N4 HO/A5 0R45TO3 ?O1-6D CR4T6R M 1#/4TN6R C4NN4N8 R61ORT6RE
#"t .5ile .e s5o"ldnMt r"s5 for t5e e<its immediatelyA .e s5o"ld lay o"t a timeta-le for .it5dra.al t5at .o"ld remove all troo(s -y t5e end of ne<t year. And .e s5o"ld state &learly t5at .e .ill not kee( any military -ases in 8ra1 -- t5atMs a no--rainerA for it &osts "s not5ingA -"t o"r 5edging on -ases antagoniIes 8ra1i nationalists and res"lts in more dead Ameri&ans. 2"&5 a timeta-le .o"ld for&e 8ra1is to (re(are -- (oliti&ally and militarily -- to r"n t5eir o.n &o"ntry. T5e year or t.o of transition .o"ld galvaniIe 8ra1i 25iites to find a mod"s vivendi .it5 2"nnis .5ile "ndermining t5e ins"rgentsM arg"ments t5at t5ey are nationalists (rote&ting t5e mot5erland from Kankee &r"saders. Tr"eA a timeta-le is ar-itrary and riskyA for it &o"ld J"st en&o"rage ins"rgents to 5ang tig5t for anot5er &o"(le of years. #"t .eMre -eing killed -- literally -- -e&a"se of nationalist s"s(i&ions among 8ra1is t5at .eMre J"st after t5eir oil and -ases and t5at .eMre going to stay forever. 8tMs &r"&ial t5at .e defuse t5at nationalist rage. =or no.A .eMve -e&ome t5e (inata of 8ra1i (oliti&sA somet5ing for 8ra1i demagog"es to -as5 to -oost t5eir o.n legitima&y. 'oktada al-2adrA one of t5e s&ariest 8ra1i leadersA 5as very s5re.dly "sed 5is den"n&iations of t5e F.2. to -oost 5is o.n (oliti&al follo.ing and infl"en&e a&ross 8ra1G t5atMs o"r gift to 5imA a &onse1"en&e of o"r myo(ia. And many ordinary 8ra1is are -"ying into t5is s&a(egoating of t5e F.2. 0d.ard 7ongA one of my intre(id Times &olleag"es in #ag5dadA 1"oted a &lot5ing mer&5ant named A-d"l-;ader Ali as sayingD MM8 &an tell yo" t5e main reason -e5ind all o"r .oes -- it is Ameri&a. 0veryt5ing t5at is going on -et.een 2"nnis and 25iitesA t5e tro"-lemaker in t5e middle is Ameri&a.MM
)1
Cal 2k6-7
#5 ,resence dam,ens 4ra>i security force effectiveness timeta!le solves Re,. 'artin +ee"an- $%%=?5tt(D//....5o"se.gov/mee5an/ira1.5ite(a(er.5tm@
Des(ite t5ese fail"resA t5ere remains .ides(read &onsens"s t5at t5e stat"s of 8ra1i se&"rity for&es is t5e key fa&tor in 8ra1+s a-ility to govern itself. Fnfort"natelyA t5e o&&"(ation itself 5as 5ad some adverse effe&ts on t5e se&"rity training (rogram. !isi-le &oo(eration .it5 F.2. for&es 5as made t5e 8ra1i se&"rity for&es targets for ins"rgents. 2&ores of se&"rity for&es and trainees 5ave -een killed in &ar -om-ingsA drive--y s5ootingsA kidna((ingsA and e<e&"tions. Conse1"entlyA "ntold n"m-ers of (otential re&r"its 5ave -een deterred from Joining. 8n additionA t5e (resen&e of F.2. for&es red"&es t5e 8ra1i se&"rity for&es+ .illingness to risk t5eir lives to fig5t ins"rgents. 7it5 -etter-trained and -etter-e1"i((ed F.2. for&es fig5ting alongside t5emA 8ra1i for&es are (res"ma-ly less likely to Join t5e fig5t. A&&ording to t5e 8nternational Crisis :ro"(A t5e se&"rity for&es s"ffer from Bam-ivalen&e to.ard t5e o&&"(ation for&es and t5e (oliti&al transition as .ell as t5e a-sen&e of &redi-le military and (oliti&al instit"tions to .5i&5 t5eir loyalty &an -e dire&ted.C <Pl<vQ Anno"n&ing a timeta-le for a F.2. .it5dra.al may give 8ra1i se&"rity for&es rene.ed allegian&e to t5e fledgling 8ra1i government and greater reason to ass"me res(onsi-ilities for defending it. 8n t5e .ords of 6resident #"s5A MM"ltimately t5e s"&&ess in 8ra1 is going to -e t5e .illingness of t5e 8ra1i &itiIens to fig5t for t5eir o.n freedom.R T5e Fnited 2tates s5o"ld e<(edite t5e training of se&"rity for&es -y devoting additional reso"r&es and seeking greater &ommitments of trainers from ot5er nationsA in&l"ding NAT% and neig5-oring '"slim &o"ntries. 6riority s5o"ld -e given to training t5e for&es to meet 8ra1+s most (ressing needsA namely a (oli&e for&e t5at in&l"des a &o"nterterrorist Bs(e&ial "nit.C
)2
Cal 2k6-7
4nsurgency (ill crum!le (it"dra( (ins 4ra>i su,,ort Re,. 'artin +ee"an- $%%=?5tt(D//....5o"se.gov/mee5an/ira1.5ite(a(er.5tm@
T5e anno"n&ement of a timeta-le for a F.2. .it5dra.al .ill transform t5e sit"ation in 8ra1. T5e (oliti&s and reality on t5e gro"nd for every (arty in 8ra1 .ill &5ange. 'oreoverA as .e (re(are to s(ell o"t t5e terms of o"r .it5dra.alA .e gain leverage .it5 all .5o mig5t gain or lose gro"nd -ased on t5ose terms. T5ere are limits to t5is leverageD for e<am(leA t5e Fnited 2tates &annot &redi-ly t5reaten to B&"t and r"nC immediately. Nor &an .e (romise all t5ings to all (eo(le. 7e &anA 5o.everA make arrangements t5at in&rease t5e likeli5ood t5at vario"s fa&tions .ill agree to (arti&i(ate in a (ea&ef"l (oliti&al (ro&ess in 8ra1. Anno"n&ing a timeta-le for dra.ing do.n troo( strengt5 .o"ldD 'elp win the support of the "ra(i people for the political process and against the insurgency 2etting a timeta-le for .it5dra.al .o"ld &larify t5at t5e Fnited 2tates 5as no long-term desire to o&&"(y 8ra1 or &ontrol its reso"r&es. T5is .o"ld strengt5en t5e legitima&y of t5e 8ra1i government (rod"&ed -y t5e >an"ary 3 ele&tions. 8t .o"ld also 5el( -egin to red"&e t5e 8ra1i (o("lation+s distr"st of Coalition for&es. T5ere are t.o -asi& &o"nterins"rgen&y ta&ti&sD assa"lt and (a&ifi&ation. T5e Fnited 2tates 5as &5osen t5e assa"lt ro"te $ to seek o"t ins"rgentsA Join t5em in -attleA and .in. T5is .as t5e (rimary a((roa&5 in =all"Ja5. T5e se&ond a((roa&5A (a&ifi&ationA &5anges t5e em(5asis to .inning t5e s"((ort of t5e (o("lation and t5ere-y slo.ing t5e gro.t5 and de&reasing t5e s"((ort of t5e ins"rgen&y.
Cal 2k6-7
))
Cal 2k6-7
)*
Cal 2k6-7
Cit"dra( relieves t"e strain no( is t"e 'ey time BB Ne(s- 1/26/$%%2 ?5tt(D//ne.s.--&.&o."k/2/5i/ameri&as/)6)/366.stm@
T5e F2 military 5as -e&ome dangero"sly overstret&5ed -e&a"se of t5e s&ale of its o(erations in 8ra1 and Afg5anistanA t.o re(orts 5ave .arned. %neA -y former offi&ials in t5e Clinton administrationA said t5e (ress"re of re(eated de(loyments .as very &orrosive and &o"ld 5ave long-term effe&ts. T5e se&ondA ordered -y t5e 6entagon and yet to -e releasedA re(ortedly &alls t5e army Rstret&5ed to -reaking (ointR. T5e F2 defen&e se&retary dismissed t5e &laims as o"t of date or misdire&ted. A-o"t 1 ,A333 F2 troo(s remain in 8ra1A on to( of de(loyments to Afg5anistan and 4osovo. M0normo"s strainM T5e first st"dyA &ommissioned -y Demo&rati& mem-ers of CongressA listed former Defen&e 2e&retary 7illiam 6erry and former 2e&retary of 2tate 'adeleine Al-rig5t among its a"t5ors. 8t said t5e F2 military 5ad (erformed admira-ly in re&ent o(erations -"t .as "nder Renormo"s strainR. T5is strainA if not soon relievedA .ill 5ave 5ig5ly &orrosive and (otentially long-term effe&ts on t5e for&eAR it stated. T5e re(ort (redi&ted (ro-lems re&r"iting ne. troo(s and retaining &"rrent ones in t5e fa&e of re(eated overseas to"rs and s5ortfalls in vital e1"i(ment.
)6
Cal 2k6-7
)7
Cal 2k6-7
9a.ren&e 0a,lanG 2enior 0ditor at T5e Ne. Re("-li&G /6/%2G T5e Ne. Re("-li&
8ra1i for&esA R"-aie &on&edesA 5ave not rea&5ed t5e (oint .5ere t5ey &an o(erate inde(endently of t5e Ameri&ans. As if to (rove t5e (ointA an Ameri&an military offi&er in &ivilian &lot5es 5overs in t5e -a&kgro"ndA ans.ers t5e national se&"rity adviserMs (5one .5en a re(orter &allsA lives and travels .it5 R"-aieA andA 5is fello. government ministers sayA (ro-a-ly does m"&5 of t5e national se&"rity adviserMs Jo- for 5im. At t5e same timeA 8ra1Ms se&"rity for&es 5ave started to emerge from t5e s5ado. of t5eir Ameri&an instr"&tors. T5eir training 5as -een a&&eleratedA andA in t5e near f"t"reA R"-aie sees R8ra1i se&"rity for&es taking overA 8ra1i for&es taking t5e front lineA PandQ 'N= doing logisti&al and s"((ort Pf"n&tionsQ. #y t5e end of 2337AR 5e (redi&tsA R.eMre very likely to see t5e last F.2. soldier.R A&&ording to t5e F.2. militaryA t5e 8ra1i (oli&e for&e &"rrently fields a-o"t 121A333 menA &lose to t5e n"m-er (lanned forA .5ile t5e 8ra1i armed for&es n"m-er a-o"t 136A333 soldiersA nearly t.o-t5irds of t5e for&e estimated for t5e end of t5is year. T5e 8ra1i army no longer melts a.ay in &om-atA nor does it s"ffer from mass desertionsA as it did d"ring its first -attles in 233). Army re&r"its no. "ndergo a -asi& training &o"rse similar in lengt5 to t5eir Ameri&an &o"nter(artsA offi&ers attend servi&e s&5oolsA and 8ra1is (rovide m"&5 of t5e instr"&tion. As t5e se&"rity for&es gro. more &om(etentA t5ey 5ave ra(idly e<(anded t5e amo"nt of territory "nder t5eir &ontrolA .5i&5 no. in&l"des several neig5-or5oods in #ag5dad and large s.at5s of .estern 8ra1.
),
Cal 2k6-7
)/
Cal 2k6-7
OB. /in's
Draft is immoral and violates "uman rig"ts /aundry /ist
solely in t5e 5ands of t5e militaryA and t5erefore is not inde(endent and im(artialA as re1"ired -y Commission on H"man Rig5ts resol"tion 1//,/77G 8n (ra&ti&eA &ons&ientio"s o-Je&tors .5o are denied t5e rig5t to &ons&ientio"s o-Je&tion and .5o ref"se orders to de(loy are senten&ed to (risonG T5e denial of ed"&ational -enefits and ot5er forms of dis&rimination against t5ose .5o fail to register for a (otential draft "nder t5e 'ilitary 2ele&tive 2ervi&e A&t is a violation of t5e rig5t t5e ed"&ationA and also amo"nts to ("nis5ment .it5o"t trialG T5e military 5as a&&ess to (rivate data of 5ig5 s&5ool st"dents for re&r"itment ("r(osesA .5i&5 is a violation of t5e rig5t to (riva&yG Co"nter-re&r"itment a&tivists fa&e intimidation and arrest from (oli&eA militaryA and "niversity a"t5oritiesA .5i&5 amo"nts to a violation of t5e rig5t to freedom of e<(ression and freedom of assem-lyG T5e militaryMs Bsto(( lossC orders to e<tend t5e lengt5 of military em(loyment &ontra&ts .it5o"t t5e &onsent of t5e soldier &on&erned are a violation of t5e =or&ed 9a-o"r Convention.
DRA3T O6R 65 4ND4V4D#A/5 TO R6845T6R THRO#8H D61R4VAT4ON O3 R48HT5 Car Resister9s 4nternational- +arc"- $%%2 ?"tt,://(((.(ri-irg.org/,df/usa%2%&-en.,dfE
8n (ra&ti&eA registration is enfor&ed -y t5e denial of -enefits .5i&5 are availa-le to ot5er &itiIens. T5ose .5o 5ave not registered are not eligi-le for federal loans or grants for 5ig5er ed"&ationA for federally-f"nded Jo- trainingA or for most federal em(loyment. T5e federal government 5as also en&o"raged state and m"ni&i(al legislat"res to ena&t similar legislation. As of A"g"st 233)A at least 23 of t5e fifty states ?2 a&&ording to t5e 2ele&tive 2ervi&e Agen&y@ re1"ired t5ose eligi-le to -e registered for t5e draft as a (re&ondition of re&eiving state finan&e for 5ig5er ed"&ation and 17 states .o"ld not em(loy "nregistered (ersons in any &a(a&ity. Nine states de-arred "nregistered men from admission to state &olleges or "niversities. 2tates 5ave also -een en&o"raged to make registration a (re&ondition for t5e iss"e of a driving li&en&eA or a state san&tioned (5otogra(5i& 8DG andA again as of A"g"st 233)A 21 and t5e !irgin 8slands Territory 5ad done soA and in 8llinois t5e ne&essary legislation .as a.aiting t5e :overnor+s a((roval. 0leven f"rt5er statesA (l"s t5e Distri&t of Colom-ia and t5e Territory of :"am 5ad linked t5e (ro&ed"re for a((li&ation for a driving li&en&e to draft registration for t5ose .5o .ere not already registeredA -"t most did not make t5is mandatory. 8n allA only 11 of t5e *3 states made no linkage -et.een draft registration and 5ig5er ed"&ationA state em(loyment or t5e iss"e of driving li&en&esG in t5irteen t5ere .as linkage in all t5ree areas2.
*3
Cal 2k6-7
OB. /in's
draft logistics violate ,rivacy and de,rive non-disclosure o,tions.
*1
i ii iii iv v vi vii viii i< < <i <ii <iii <iv <v <vi <vii <viii <i< << <<i <<ii