Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

BA Hons Dance Performance 2010-11 Assessment feedback Collaborative PracticesDevised Performance- Film Project First Marker: Dionysios Tsaftaridis

Student: Hrisanthi Koutsiouki Comments (1 Marker) 1. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided demonstrating an original, inventive investigation which reflects a unique point of view: Excellent 2. Very Good Good Concern
st

Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information, ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge Excellent Very Good Good Concern

3.

Demonstration of clarity in the structure and crafting of the presentation material, including movement: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

4.

Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

5.

Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection. Excellent Very Good Good Concern

6.

Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work, demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process Evidence of excellent directorial skills in the theatrical handling of the dancers within the work Excellent Very Good Good Concern

Additional comments:

A coherent screendance work which demonstrated good understanding of the creative process. A comparatively short, nevertheless effective screenwork.
Suggested mark (first marker); Signed: Date:

60

2 Marker FOR MODERATION/ NOT FOR STUDENTS Name of 2 Marker: Dimitris Tsioukas Student: Hrisanthi Koutsiouki Please rate as EXCELLENT, VERY GOOD, GOOD, CONCERN next to each criteria 1. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided demonstrating an original, inventive investigation which reflects a unique point of view VERY GOOD 2. Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information, ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge VERY GOOD 3. Demonstration of clarity in the structure and crafting of the presentation material, including a clear thematic focus: VERY GOOD 4. Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work how particular tasks and methods were evolved: GOOD 5. Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection and thus demonstrate your understanding and application of variety of shots, scale, rhythm in the editing process, in order to create a work that can only exist in the film medium. VERY GOOD 6. Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work, demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process Evidence of excellent directorial skills in the theatrical handling of the dancers within the work GOOD
nd

nd

Further comments: Overall good work. Cohesive, well structured, effective, good use of sound material.

Suggested Mark: 60 Signed: Date:

MODERATED RESULTS

First Marker: Suggested mark (second marker) Agreed Mark (if applicable)

________ _________ _________

____________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ____________________

(signature of first marker) (signature of second marker) (date finalised) (date finalised)