Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Draft Guide for the Detection and Location of Acoustic Emissions from Partial Discharges in Oil-Immersed Power Transformers and Reactors
Sponsored by the Transformers Committee of the IEEE Power Engineering Society
Copyright 2004 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. Three Park Avenue New York, New York 10016-5997, USA All rights reserved. This document is an unapproved draft of a proposed IEEE Standard. As such, this document is subject to change. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK! Because this is an unapproved draft, this document must not be utilized for any conformance/compliance purposes. Permission is hereby granted for IEEE Standards Committee participants to reproduce this document for purposes of IEEE standardization activities only. Prior to submitting this document to another standards development organization for standardization activities, permission must first be obtained from the Manager, Standards Licensing and Contracts, IEEE Standards Activities Department. Other entities seeking permission to reproduce this document, in whole or in part, must obtain permission from the Manager, Standards Licensing and Contracts, IEEE Standards Activities Department. IEEE Standards Activities Department Standards Licensing and Contracts 445 Hoes Lane, P.O. Box 1331 Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331, USA
Abstract: This guide is applicable to the detection and location of acoustic emissions from partial discharges and other sources in oil immersed power transformers and reactors. It is intended to provide a means of associating the relative magnitude and position of partial discharges and other sources with the acoustic signals obtained by strategically located transducers. Keywords: acoustic emission (AE), attenuation, burst, gas-in-oil analysis, low-amplitude discharges, partial discharge (PD), power transformers, reactors.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved. This is an unapproved IEEE Standards Draft, subject to change.
Introduction
This introduction is not part of IEEE xxxxxx, Guide for the Detection and Location of Acoustic Emissions from Partial Discharges in Oil - Immersed Power Transformers and Reactors. The Guide is an expansion of PC57.127 Trial Use Guide for the Detection of Acoustic Emissions from Partial Discharges in Oil-Immersed Power Transformers. It has been expanded to include more theory and signal interpretation information, newer techniques for detection and the concepts for location. Active workers in the field are constantly trying to improve their methods. More effective methods may appear in the future.
Participants
At the time this guide was completed, the Working Group on Partial Discharge Tests in Transformers had the following membership: John W. Harley, Chair Donald Ayers Ron Barker Barry Beaster Jeff Benach Tord Bengtsson Paul Boman John Bosiger Pierre Boss Carl Bush Alvaro Cancino William Carter Yunxiang Chen Bill Chiu Roy Colquitt Jerry Corkran Ed Cromer John Crouse Alan Darwin Ron Daubert Fred Elliott Don Fallon Norman Field Michael Franchek Jim Fyvie Robert Ganser Andreas Garnitschnig Richard Graham William Griesacker Sergio Guerrero Ernst Hanique Tom Harbaugh Peter Heinzig Keith Highton Thang Hochanh John Holland Anthony Jonatti Steve Jordan Samer Khaled Vladimir Khalin Emil Kowal John Lackey Robert Langan Mike Lau Eberhard Lemke Raymond Lortie Richard Lowe Andre Lux Tamyres Luiz Machado Jim McIver Martin Navarro Van Nhi Nguyen Arturo Nunez Mark Perkins Paul Pillitteri Bertrand Poulin Gusftav Preininger George Reitter John Runski Dirk Russwurm Ewald Schweiger Hemchandra Shertukde James Smith Brian Sparling Ed Tenyenhuis Subhash Tuli Albert Walls Barry Ward Eduardo Garcia Wild
The following persons were on the balloting committee: (To be supplied by IEEE Standards Project Editor at time of publication)
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
Contents
Introduction ... ii 1. Overview .. 1.1 1.2 1.3 Scope . Purpose . Safety Warning .. 5 5 5 5
2. 3.
Definitions Introduction to Acoustic Partial Discharge Systems ... 3.1 3.2 3.3 The all-acoustic system . The acoustic system with an electrical PD trigger The on-line (continuous) acoustic system .
6 8 8 8 9 9
4.
Acoustic Signal Transmission Characteristics . AE Systems: Equipment Specifications .. 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 Introduction ... External sensor .. Internal sensor ... Band-pass filter (optional) . Acoustic systems that record single events ... Acoustic systems that record data over extended periods . On-line (continuous) acoustic partial discharge systems .
5.
11 11 11 12 12 12 13 14
6.
Acoustic Emission Testing: Field vs. Factory Test Differences .. 14 6.1 Field vs. factory differences.. 14 6.2 General considerations 15 Acoustic Emission Field Test Procedure . 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 Introduction ... Test setup .. Sensor placement and initial scan . Monitoring techniques ... Locating the source of the signal ... Reporting and follow-up 16 16 16 16 17 18 18 18 18 19 21
7.
8.
Factory Test Procedure with an Electrical Trigger .. 8.1 8.2 8.3 Introduction to factory PD testing . Initial sensor placement . Measurements and changing of sensor placement
9.
Characterization of Acoustic Emission Signals .. Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
22 3
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 General alternating current systems... Acoustic systems that record single events .. On-line acoustic systems ...... General direct current systems .. Characteristics of partial discharge from static electrification ..... Acoustic activity from thermal faults, the core, mechanical noises and other sources.............................................................................................. Comparison between electrical and acoustic signals 22 23 25 27 27 28 28
Integrating AE Results with Data from Oil Analysis .. Acoustic Activity Interpretation .. Bibliography Signal Processing . Wavelet Signal Processing Theory .. Instrumentation calibration .. Calibration of transducer and preamplifier ..
29 30 32 35 36 38 39
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
IEEE Guide for the Detection and Location of Acoustic Emissions from Partial Discharges in Oil-Immersed Power Transformers and Reactors
1. Overview
1.1 Scope
This guide is applicable to the detection and location of acoustic emissions from partial discharges and other sources in oil immersed power transformers and reactors. Both electrical (partial discharge) and mechanical sources (such as loose clamping, bolts or insulation parts) generate these emissions. There are descriptions of acoustic instrumentation, test procedures, and interpretation of results. When this guide is used with oil-immersed reactors, it must be understood that interpretation of signals may be different because of the construction of the reactor. Accuracy of location depends on the type of fault, configuration of tank, type of instrumentation and experience.
1.2 Purpose
This guide is intended to provide a means of associating the relative magnitude and position of partial discharges and other sources with the acoustic signals obtained by strategically located transducers. Users are intended to be persons knowledgeable in this field such as utility engineers, consultants, academics and manufacturers.
1. The transformer tank must be connected to a low resistance ground to limit the extremely high voltages being induced into the ground circuit and the tank if a high voltage to ground failure occurs. The personnel risk is very high if the transformer fails to ground. Even when grounded properly, the voltage on the tank to a different ground source may be LETHAL at the instant the failure occurs. 2. If the transformer is being energized or de-energized, or there is another type of power system voltage, all personnel should maintain a reasonable distance from the transformer and equipment electrically connected to the tank due to the possibility of a failure. It is recommended that acoustic measurement equipment connected to the tank be electrically isolated from the transformer tank, e.g., by optical means or by high-voltage electrical insulation, when measuring during transient events to eliminate the danger to the equipment or operators. 3. It is preferable to make all connections to the tank with the transformer de-energized, but in no case should the transformer voltage be above normal voltage while the sonic measuring devices are
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change 5
installed. Personnel must not access areas where high voltages are within striking distance, such as on top of energized transformers or in bushing compartments. 4. The transformer ground circuit must never be changed (connected or disconnected) while the transformer is energized. Even with the transformer de-energized, it is possible to have circulating currents in substation ground circuits; therefore, appropriate care should be exercised when connecting or disconnecting ground circuits.
2. Definitions
2.1 Acoustic couplant: a material used at the structure-to-sensor interface to improve the transmission of acoustic energy across the interface during acoustic emission monitoring. All liquids and many gels meet this criterion. Couplants produced for ultrasonic non-destructive testing purposes are generally suitable. However, gelled glycerin and silicone grease are particularly efficient and are recommended. Acoustic emission (AE) oscillation: An oscillation produced by a resonant piezo-electric crystal when perturbed by a shock wave, which could be caused by a partial discharge. Acoustic emission oscillation rate or count rate: The number of AE oscillations that exceed the counter threshold level in a time interval, often one-second, or a number of cycles, depending on the instrument being used. For example there are 13 oscillations in the detail of Figure 1. The time interval in the detail is not defined.
2.2
2.3
Bursts 1 2
5 6
9 Threshold
13 Oscillations
2.4
Acoustic impedance: The decisive factor for determining reflection and transmission properties when passing from one acoustic medium to another. The acoustic impedance is denoted Z and defined as (density) x (propagation velocity), Z = r v. Attenuation: The decrease in AE amplitude per unit distance, normally expressed in dB per unit length. Attenuation is due to a combination of wave diffusion and losses due to molecular collisions, as well as reflection / transmission at media interfaces.
2.5
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 2.6 Barkhausen effect or magnetostriction noise: noise associated with the deformation of magnetic domains in the core of a transformer. The primary frequency occurs at twice the power frequency; the amplitude of this signal in both halves is about the same. Over fluxing may create considerable noise, which may have high frequency components that reach to 30-40 kHz or above. Critical angle: The largest incidence angle (from normal) for which a wave can enter a medium that has a higher propagation velocity. This angle is given by sin ()=Vin/Vout; for an oil-steel interface it is about 25 degrees for transverse waves in steel. Decibel: The decibel (dB) scale is a logarithmic scale commonly used to express sound pressure or energy levels. The conversion between decibel level and linear scale is: Sound Pressure Level (dB) = 20 log (P/Pref), where: the reference pressure, Pref, is typically 1 Pascal. Sound energy, which is proportional to the square of the pressure, increases 26% for each decibel increase. This means that the sound energy doubles for each 3-dB increase. 2.9 Diffraction: The distortion of an acoustic wave front by an object in the sound field. It is characterized by the "bending" of sound waves around the obstruction.
2.7
2.8
2.10 Direct acoustic (oil-borne) path: Propagation of the PD acoustic signal through the oil directly to the sensor location on the tank wall. 2.11 Harmonics: Higher frequency components of various noises are sometimes difficult to distinguish from partial discharge. They can be repetitive, but are usually at lower energy levels than significant partial discharge
2.12 Longitudinal waves or pressure waves: Consist of alternate compression and rarefaction of oil in the direction of propagation. The molecules vibrate back and forth about their rest positions parallel to the wave axis. Normally this is the only kind of wave that propagates in liquids and gases. They are easily propagated by molecular collision. 2.13 Out-of-plane waves: In a flat plate or shell, an out-of-plane wave yields motion that is perpendicular to the plane of the plate. A pressure wave in the oil impinging at normal incidence on the tank will generate out-ofplane motion in the tank wall. These waves are also called bending or flexural waves. Out-of-plane waves have a propagation velocity that is dependent on the frequency and are thus difficult to use for localization. 2.14 Partial discharge (PD): An electrical discharge that only partially bridges the insulation between conductors. 2.15 Reflection: Scattering of propagating waves back in the direction of origin by an obstruction or discontinuity in the propagation path. 2.16 Sensors: For the applications discussed here, damped acoustic emission piezo-electric sensors are generally used to transform the particle motion produced by an elastic wave into an electrical signal. They are typically mounted externally on the transformer tank or mounted on a wave-guide that is submerged in the oil inside the transformer tank. Different investigators are using sensors with a sensitive region ranging from about 20 kHz to 500 kHz. As sensor output is usually inversely proportional to bandwidth, often a sensor with a narrower bandwidth centered at either 60 kHz or 150 kHz is used in PD detection. Note that the sensor is sensitive to pressure waves in its frequency range that may not be from a PD source. 2.17 Speed of sound in oil medium: 1413m/s at 20 C typical. Corrections to speed of sound for temperature and moisture content are not generally made to increase accuracy because the uncertainties due to material propagation are usually much larger. The values of the speed of sound in oil may change depending on the properties of the oil. 2.18 Speed of sound in steel: pressure wave (bulk) about 5800 m/s, (plate) about 5200 m/s; shear/transverse wave Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change 7
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 (bulk) about 3250 m/s, (plate) about 3200 m/s 2.19 Structure-borne path: Propagation of the PD acoustic signal through the transformer structure. 2.20 Transverse or shear waves: The particle motion is perpendicular to propagation direction similar to a vibrating string. A necessary condition is that there is sufficient attraction force between particles, so that as each particle moves back and forth, it pulls its neighbor along with it. The reason they do not occur in liquid and gases is that there is only a small attractive force between molecules. Typically shear waves travel at about half the velocity of longitudinal waves. At wavelengths comparable to or larger than the thickness of the material, the transversal waves are gradually transformed to out-of-plane waves (definition 2.13).
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 processing time may be taken into account in order to decrease location error. The following time lags due to the analog processing time were measured in three different electrical PD detector types.
Type of detector Wide-band with active Integrator (100-400 kHz) Narrow-band at 1 MHz With 9 kHz bandwidth Narrow-band at 1 MHz With 4.5 kHz bandwidth
Time-lag to t0 0.2 s 16 s 16 s
Approximate location error in oil Negligible (< 2 mm) 22-70 mm (1~3 in.) 22-95 mm (1~4 in.)
The numbers are provided only as an example. Other detectors from different manufacturers may have different time lags since this property is not specified in the standards. It can be seen that a narrow-band detector may introduce a time lag that should be taken into account if very accurate location measurements are desired. For the calculation of distance of PD source from the sensor, following are estimates of the velocity of sound in oil. The velocity will be different if there are other materials in the wave path (see also definition 2.17). Temperature of oil - C 50 80 110 Velocity m/s 1300 1200 1100
One advantage of the combined system is that the electrical measurement provides confirmation that the acoustic sensors are locating a PD event as opposed to another acoustic noise source. Furthermore, the electrical signal is a convenient trigger that can be used to start the data acquisition at the acoustic sensors. The major disadvantage of the combined system is that it may be difficult to obtain a clean electric PD measurement due to electrical noise in the field. Hence, the combined acoustic-electrical PD locator system is more suitable for use in the factory or plant than in the field.
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 Consequently, sensors placed at different locations on the tank wall, i.e. at different distances from the source, will experience different signal arrival times. For the case of the all-acoustic system, it is possible to detect the difference in signal arrival time at one sensor relative to another. This in turn allows for the estimation of the difference in the two propagation path distances. For the case of the combined acoustic-electric system, the time delay between the source and the sensor can be detected, and the absolute path length between the source and a given sensor can be determined. Each of these system types requires a slightly different procedure to locate the source, as described in the sections on Operating Procedures, Sections 7 and 8. The fundamental principle of acoustic PD source location assumes that the acoustic signal travels a direct, straightline route from the source to the sensor. Unfortunately, this is not always the case as the acoustic field inside the tank is very complex due to wave reflection, diffraction in different materials and other parameters. For example, if there is an obstruction blocking the line of sight between the source and the sensor location, the sound may travel around the obstruction. This results in a longer propagation time that would imply a greater distance between the source and the sensor than actually exists. Alternately, the sound may travel directly through the obstruction at a wave speed that is greater than in the oil. The resulting arrival time would be earlier, which would imply a shorter distance between the source and the sensor than actually exists. To help avoid these misinterpretations, it is important to confirm the estimated source location by repeating the distance calculations with several sensor locations. Structure-borne propagation paths within the tank wall present a further technical challenge. As the acoustic wave hits the tank wall, its frequency characteristics remain the same, but its mode of propagation and propagation speed change. Take the example in Figure 2 in which the sensor is located on the far side of the tank, away from the source.
Structure-borne path
Figure 2 - Illustration of typical propagation paths for the acoustic PD signal. Primary reflection wave propagation can take place within the confines of the tank as shown. The speed of sound for this wave depends on the media encountered by the sound wave. Acoustic waves hitting the nearby tank wall will create an alternate propagation path via the tank wall to the sensor on the other side. The wave speed in metal is greater than in oil. Therefore the wave traveling this structure-borne path may arrive at the sensor earlier than the wave traveling the direct acoustic path. If the distance calculations were based on the arrival time of the structure-borne wave using the wave speed in oil, this would imply an incorrect distance between the source and the sensor. It is crucial that distance calculations are based on the direct acoustic path. It is critical to confirm the estimated source location by using a variety of sensor locations. Another way to distinguish the structure-borne waves from the oil-borne waves is to analyze the mode of vibration. Fluids, such as oil, will only support pressure waves. Solids, such as steel, can support many types of wave motion. Waves in the oil give rise to both pressure waves and shear waves in the tank wall.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
10
Tank wall
Figure 3 - Illustration of the longitudinal and transversal waves in the enclosure and how they are created from direct waves. Note: the wavelengths are not to scale. Two wave fronts will be seen in these cases, as illustrated in Figure 3. The transversal (also called shear or slow) wave has the largest amplitude and can be identified in this way. Using sensors that are more sensitive to out-ofplane waves than in-plane waves can help to minimize structure-borne interference. The problem of structure-borne waves is reduced significantly if the acoustic sensor is located inside the tank.
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 electrical isolation. However, care should be taken to select a resin which exhibits low acoustic attenuation (usually a function of the fillers used) so that it does not adversely affect the amplitude of the transmitted signal. Furthermore, as the acoustic impedance of epoxy resin does not numerically fall between that of steel and crystal the thickness of the matching piece should be equivalent to half the wavelength of the signal propagating in it (in this case, 60 or 150 kHz longitudinal waves). The acoustic couplant gel or grease defined in 2.1 should be applied to the face of the transducer or matching piece just prior to test.
b) Sensor holders - these must be practical even when reaching far while standing high up on a ladder. c) Cabling and power supply units for the sensors. d) Measuring device for measuring sensor positions, etc. e) A digital detection system. This may consist of one or more standard 4-channel digital oscilloscopes with sampling rate for each channel greater than 1 mega-sample/second and memory depth greater than 5000 samples. Data acquisition units available for computers could be used if they fulfill these requirements. Features such as averaging, peak detection, zoom, measurements and storage are very useful.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
12
b) One or more 4-channel digital oscilloscopes for signal acquisition, one oscilloscope for each detector frame. With digital oscilloscopes, a great flexibility in choosing the trigger method, channel and level is obtained. Further, the fast refreshment rate of the screen is invaluable as a help to discriminate against spurious signals. Other facilities that have proven to be very important are the averaging and persistency functions normally available. c) A computer for storage of the signals acquired by the oscilloscopes.
This system is intended to be operated by an experienced person. In searching for possible PD signals and their origin, the detector frame is moved to selected positions on the transformer tank. At each position, a set of different trigger and time frame settings are studied on the oscilloscope, which is thus the main instrument. For reference, a few signals can be stored in the computer. When a signal to be localized is found, the computer aids in calculating the estimated position of the source.
c) DSP two channel digital AE card with minimum 512kB RAM (expandable), two analog and one digital parametric and hardware and parallel capture of transient and classical AE feature extraction data, I/O ports, PC interface, sensor preamp, BNC auto sensor calibration, and software selectable filters. An alternate digital hardware that can increase the number of channels that can be handled by the DSP board with suitable interface box can be used. This should have a minimum of 1 MHz as a sampling rate per channel per sensor from which data is being acquired. d) An acoustic sensor as described in 2.16, 5.2 and 5.3 above e) Hold-downs for the acoustic sensors f) Suitable User's Manual with proper instructions and suitable examples to illustrate working of the device and interpretation of results g) Transportation cases for data acquisition system and accessories are suggested
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
13
These systems usually consist of (1) multiple sensors, which are placed at locations where faults may be anticipated based on past experience or highest probability of problems occurring, and (2) amplifier and data acquisition/processing systems that are able to transmit collected data and/or warning alerts to locations outside the substation. Supply of power from the station DC source or another uninterruptible supply may be specified. For long-term robustness, the systems should require protection of inputs, outputs and grounds similar to electronic relays. A test to establish the baseline data of acoustic activity on the transformer is performed during the installation process. This test provides information to establish the best hardware and software settings for permanent monitoring. It is helpful for gain settings to be the same as adjacent transformers in order to compare readings if signals are thought to be the result of network disturbances. Permanent mounting of sensors may be desirable for long term installations. This may be accomplished with a suitable epoxy and/or a mechanical holder.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
14
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 and equipment needs to be established. Precautions needed for working near energized facilities. Generally limited knowledge of what is inside the tank. Limited adjustment range unless a test power supply is taken to the transformer location Use care that sensors are mounted below oil level. Also, bubbles may be present during certain operating conditions. built into test bay.
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 n) Aluminum or stainless steel walls are non-magnetic. Sensors may have to be placed using epoxy. o) Do not mount sensors on control boxes p) LTC operation contains a high electromechanical energy that usually propagates through the entire transformer. Actions should be taken in order to identify operations during the test and distinguish them in post-test analysis to identify the source of acoustic emissions. q) Shell-form transformers: locate the sensors on top (above the core) or bottom (below the core). r) Transient voltage protection must be applied to the input of test instruments/devices. s) Extraneous electrostatic and magnetic signals may cause false indications and damage equipment.
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 each of the 4 sides of the transformer tank. c) If the transformer has a preventive autotransformer inside, consideration should be given to placing one or two transducers close to its location. d) Using the same sensor locations and software settings when testing identical transformers permits establishing ambient baseline data for that particular design. The sensors may have to be moved to improve reception of signals from a specific source. e) Sufficient couplant gel is to be applied to the face of the transducer to ensure efficient transmission of the AE signal from the tank wall to the sensing crystal. Too much couplant will not be harmful (though wasteful), whereas too little couplant can seriously inhibit the transducers sensing capabilities. f) Magnetic shielding blocks the signal from the sensors. The location where shielding is installed is usually obtained by referring to pictures or notes from past experience with the transformer or from the manufacturer. g) In the case of transformers indicating arcing, a high frequency split-core CT or ammeter (Rogowsky coil type) around the transformer case ground can be used as a direct signal to the digitizer. This can be used as the trigger transducer to indicate time zero. The time period for the initial scan is dependent on the acoustic activity rate. Some users monitor for about 4 hours before changing transducer placement. This basically assures the emission patterns are consistent and repeatable. If activity rates are low or erratic overnight monitoring may be required. The face of the transducer with its film of couplant should be brought into contact with the transformer tank wall with only sufficient pressure applied in order to get a good signal and hold it in position. It is only necessary to hold the sensor steady so that no signals are generated due to relative movement between the sensor and tank wall. This can be achieved by means of a magnetic clamp, adhesive tape or epoxy.
Acoustic monitoring after repair allows comparison of before and after acoustic signatures and allows establishing the new baseline data of the transformer.
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 sensors are connected to the transformer tank wall. The outputs of the sensors are connected to the acoustic location system for viewing the acoustic signal and its time delay from the electrical signal.
Figure 4 - Example of HV-Side of Three-phase Transformer Assembly Ideally, initial placement of sensors would resemble one of the three arrangements shown in Figures 5a, 5b, and 5c. Figures 5a and 5b are for the case when the problem phase is known; Figure 5c for when it is not known.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
19
Figure 5a - Sensor Locations with PD Source in Center Phase. Typically sensors are located on each side wall.
Figure 5b - Sensor Locations with PD Source in Outer Phase. Typically sensors are located on each side wall and on the end wall.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
20
Figure 5c - Sensor locations when phase of PD source is not known. Sensors are located initially on one side wall.
In the above figures, the top, middle, and bottom of the suspect phases are tested, in an effort to obtain general overall coverage of each phase. In actual practice, however, often the most convenient placement of the sensors is not possible due to obstructions such as radiators, tank stiffeners, on-load tap changers, and control cabinets. Figure 6 shows the plan view of an actual transformer tank having all of the aforementioned obstructions.
Figure 6 - Transformer Tank Plan View Some creativity is therefore required, and the actual sensor placement may be significantly different from the arrangements shown in the previous figures. For example, due to the presence of radiators or internal wiring trays, the sensors for one phase might need to be placed on the opposite side-wall than the other two phases. Mounting the sensors on manhole or other covers may provide an AE signal path that is clear of tank wall - carried signal if the cover is isolated from the tank by flexible gaskets. The transformer oil must be in contact with the inside surface of the cover for the sensor to be effective. Shell form type transformer arrangement requires special mention owing to the shielding used inside the tank walls. Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change 21
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 It may only be possible to place sensors on the top of the tank or in areas where there is no shielding.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
22
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 b. Sporadic PD is typified by lengthy quiescent periods (perhaps minutes) followed by short periods of very high activity. This type of signal usually has been found to be associated with floating static shields. Often short-lived arcs are associated with this type of fault, and these produce very energetic AE signals during active periods.
As previously described, it is often possible to determine the position on the tank wall where the transducer is closest to the PD source. This does not give information as to the distance into the tank (from that location) to the source. However, observing the signal on an oscilloscope (a digital transient recorder is recommended), it is possible to form an opinion regarding this. For example, the pulse shown in Figure 1 has suffered very little attenuation. This is evidenced by the high rise rate of the leading edge of the burst envelope, resulting in the characteristic "arrow head" shape. To achieve this, the propagation path is almost entirely in oil with little solid insulation involved. If the same signal had propagated through layers of insulating materials, the resulting attenuation would not only have affected the overall amplitude, but also modified the burst envelope by "rounding off" the leading edge. In the extreme, the burst envelope becomes "egg-shaped" or "ellipsoid-shaped" as shown in Figure 7. By utilizing this phenomenon, it may be possible to estimate whether the source lies close to the surface or is buried well within the insulation system.
The attenuation shown in the Figure 7 AE burst can also be caused by the location of the sensor on the wall of the transformer in a position that is beyond the critical angle. If the sensor is placed in a position beyond the critical angle, the signal goes into the plane of the tank wall as a shear or transversal wave instead of directly through the tank wall. The combination of some transversal wave reaching the sensor first (the velocity of the signal through steel is faster than through the oil) and then followed shortly by the pressure wave looks like the attenuated AE burst in Figure 7. The user must always be aware that the responding characteristics of the sensor may at times be more in evidence than the forcing characteristics of the PD signal. In addition to the characteristics noted above, PD usually has a correlation to the excitation frequency waveform. In some cases there is a slight "jitter" back and forth from a constant position on the waveform.
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 Attenuation of the signal inside the tank affects high frequencies more than low. The attenuation of the signal also creates a lack of correlation of scaling factor between the acoustic signal and electrically measured apparent charge. Some examples of signals are shown in the figures below.
FFT:direct PD signal 0.3 0.2 0. 0.1E-03 0.1 0. -0.1 -0.2 direct PD signal 0.3E-03 0.4E-03 0.5E-03 0.6E-03 0.7E-03 0.8E-03
Figure 8 - A laboratory recorded direct PD signal (bottom) and its power spectrum (top) For the signal in the time frame of Figure 8, the x-scale is in seconds, while the frequency frame x-scale is Hz. The sensor used has its main sensitivity in the range 20 - 120 kHz, which is clearly visible in the spectrum. Note the sharp initial rise in the time frame; maximum amplitude is reached in the first oscillation. The second, more dilute, burst at about 0.7 ms is due to reflection.
1. 0. 0.5 0.2E+06 0.3E+06
FFT:ttd1 0.5 0.7E-03 -0.6E-03 0. -0.4E-03 -0.3E-03 -0.2E-03 -0.1E-03 0. 0.1E-03 0.2E-0
ttd1
Figure 9 - A laboratory recorded signal with clear signs of propagation in the tank wall, together with its power spectrum The time frame signal in Figure 9 shows a typical two-step behavior. The longitudinal wave arrives first with lower amplitude than the transversal wave that comes about 0.04 ms later. The frequency content will be slightly dependent on the wall thickness, length of wall path etc., but is mainly unchanged from a direct signal.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
24
0.
0.1 0.05
0.5E+05
0.1E+06
0.1 0.05
time domain
Figure 10 - A weak time domain PD signal together with power spectra for entire signal (middle) and for the noise part (top) Comparison of the two spectra in Figure 10 reveals that the PD signal main amplitude is around 50 kHz. This is because the source is under paper insulation, which attenuates higher frequencies. The signal is just slightly larger than acquisition system noise.
Signal
Figure 11 - A clear signal with indications of wall propagation (bottom). These indications are confirmed by averaging (top) Averaging can be a very effective method to reduce noise, as illustrated in Figure 11. The trigger was in this case set on the high amplitude oscillation in the acoustic signal. A stable trigger and a high sample rate are required for averaging. Several independent averages should always be performed to avoid chance coincidences. If applicable, averaging is often the most effective method to reduce noise. Note, for example, the very weak indications of a signal appearing around -0.3 ms in the upper trace. Such observations are often the key to a successful localization.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
25
0.3
0.
0.1E+06
0.15E+06
0.2
0.1
FFT:signal
0.1
-0.003
-0.002
-0.001
0.
0.
signal
Figure 12 - A PD signal that has passed from the high-voltage side to the low-voltage side of a transformer The wave front in Figure 12 is not sharply rising; it grows slowly (note time scale) and starts roughly at -1.5 ms in the figure. The power spectrum shows a strong peak around 35 kHz, indicating the passage of the signal through considerable amounts of attenuating material.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
26
Figure 13 - PD waveforms for signal on different sensors placed on a transformer tank. The signal at sensor 6 is a developing ellipsoid-shaped signal. It is delayed, indicating that it is far away from the PD source compared to sensor 4. An initial trigger of channel 6 is caused by the signal crossing a known amplitude threshold at zero micro-seconds. The pre-trigger time is generally 20 microseconds for a sampling frequency of the A/D of 1 MHz. The maximum value of this signal has not been attained yet in the time window set for this snapshot of a total of 120 microseconds. This indicates that the travel of the signal is possibly through several media or the sensor location has caused the propagation time to last for such a long time before reaching the sensor. If the signal is synchronous, it is usually noise. The waveforms in Figure 13 from sensors 2, 3 & 5 show that the signature of these signals is repeating (periodic) with an average period that can be estimated in relation to some frequency in the bandwidth of the sensors. Such a signal with a predictable frequency is typically called synchronous. Software with a PD locator algorithm uses data collected by the system and three dimensional details of the transformer tank to generate the best estimate of the PD location. This software may use wavelet transform methods to estimate the PD location (Annex C).
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
27
9.6 Acoustic activity from thermal faults, the core, mechanical noises and other sources
Acoustic emission techniques have typically been used only for the detection and location of PD/arcing in power transformers when an indication of a problem is pointed out by other techniques (usually gas-in-oil). However, it has been observed through the years that transformers without gassing history and/or no indication of an electrical problem produce acoustic activity when monitored over a fixed period of time [B42]. These signals must be differentiated from PD signals for the results to be effective. Some examples and their characteristics follow. a) Core magnetostriction noise (Barkhausen effect): harmonics of this noise are often in the 30-40 kHz frequency range. b) Pumped liquid noise: the discharge from oil circulating pumps may interfere with PD signals with transducers placed low on the transformer tank. They usually have no correlation with the 50 or 60 Hz waveform. c) Loose nameplates, pipes hitting each other, fan noise, etc. may sometimes have repeatable waveforms close to PD signals. The length of the signal is often much longer than the PD signal, which is characteristically under 150s. d) Loose shielding connections in the transformer tank may cause large PD indications, but not be detrimental to transformer operation. The location of the signals must be considered and correlated with transformer design drawings. e) Wiring from the sensors to the amplifiers, if not properly shielded, will pick up spurious PD signals. Look at Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change 28
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 every possible source before concluding there are major problems inside the transformer. f) Trucks, environmental noises (thunderstorms, rain, snow, hail, wind, etc.), and miscellaneous events near the transformer tank may activate the acoustic sensors. These are random signals lasting longer than one ms. g) Switching and load tap changer movement are random signals. h) Thermal faults may cause random signals [B15, B36] The correlation of additional parameters of the transformer during the test (current, voltage, pump/fan current, oil temperature, winding temperature, phase angle, etc) with the acoustic emission data may assist in identification and separation of the different acoustic sources detected during a test [B35]. If possible, a correlation with electrical PD detection can aid in distinguishing between PD and noise signals.
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 Nearby car ignition Switched electronic power supplies Radio stations, transmitter Weather (rain, sleet, snow, hail) Moisture / Degradation in the oil Yes Yes Yes No No No No )1 no relation to phase angle )1 Electrical noise filter (band-stop) or shift in RIV frequency required
Other diagnostic methods have to supplement the PD detection (PF, DGA etc.)
)1 Successful electrical PD detection requires noise suppression (e.g. gating together with an external noise antenna) and observation of the PD - phase pattern (fingerprint) )2 Very strong electrical signals can couple into the transducer or amplifier if the detector is not sufficiently screened )3 Field tests have proven (B32) that acoustic detection of PD in the bushing can be achieved if acoustic sensors are placed on the lower part of the bushing, close to the capacitance tap. See SAFETY WARNING Subclause 1.3. )4 Several cases have been reported (B31, B41) where PD/Arcing and/or tracking has been detected inside LTC compartments, either on the insulating support bars or on the diverter switch cylinder.
30
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 an alternate database for correlation with acoustic emission data in the signal interpretation process.
Annex A (Informative)
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change 31
Bibliography
Since the early 1950s, there has been much activity in the area of ultrasonic/acoustic emission detection of partial discharges. The following bibliography is intended to give a broad overview of the subject and provide references for further study. [B1] "Acoustic Emission Detection of Partial Discharges in Power Transformers," EPRI final report no. EL-4009, 1985. [B2] Anderson, J.G., "Ultrasonic Detection and Location in Insulating Structures," AIEE Transactions No. 75, 1956. [B3] Application Note AN23, "Table of Ultrasonic Properties," Metrotek Inc., Richland WA. [B4] ASTM Standard E 650-85 "Standard guide for mounting piezoelectric acoustic emission sensors." [B5] Bartnikas and McMahon, "Engineering Dielectrics," Vol. 1, Chapter 10, by R.T. Harrold, ASTM Publication, STP669-1979. [B6] Bengtsson, T. and Jnsson, B., "Transformer PD Diagnosis using Acoustic Emission Technique," ISH-97, paper no. 115. [B7] Bengtsson, T., Leijon, M. and Ming, L., "Acoustic Frequencies Emitted by Partial Discharges in Oil," ISH-93, paper no. 63.10 [B8] Berent, D., "Acoustic Monitoring and Gas-In-Oil Analysis for Transformers," Report #62PAIC95, pp 83.183.6, Doble Engineering Company. [B9] Boczar, T., "Identification of a Specific Type of PD from Acoustic Emission Frequency Spectra," IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, pp 598-606, August 2001, New York, NY. [B10] Boguslaw, J. "Utilization of Acoustic Emission for Detection, Measurement, and Location of Partial Discharges," AEWG-Second International Conference on Acoustic Emission, Lake Tahoe, 1985. [B11] Carpenter, J.H., Kresge, J. S. and Musick, C. B., "Ultrasonic Corona Detection," IEEE Transactions PAS-86, No. 8, 1965. [B12] Dahlgren, D. and Harley, J.W., "Implementing a Static Electrification Diagnostic Model," EPRI Symposium on Static Electrification, May 19-21, 1999, Monterey, CA. [B13] Edmonds, P.D., "Methods of Experimental Physics," Vol. 19 (Ultrasonics), pages 18-19, Academic Press, New York, 1981. [B14] Eleftherion, P.M., "Partial Discharge XXI: Acoustic Emission-Based PD Source Location in Transformers," Proceedings IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, 08837554/95,1995. [B15] EPRI Report "Development of a New Acoustic Emissions Technique for the Detection and Location of Gassing Sources in Power Transformers: Phase 1 Results," EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, Allegheny Power, American Electric Power, Bonneville Power Administration, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Electricite de France, Exelon Corporation, and Public Service Electric and Gas Company: 2002, Product ID 1007176. [B16] EPRI Report TR-111386 "RAMAPO static electrification tests: EPRI and Consolidated Edison Company of New York." [B17] Fredrick, J.R., "Ultrasonic Engineering," John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1965, pp. 13-21. [B18] Harold, R.T., "The Relationship between Ultrasonic and Electrical Measurements of Under-Oil Corona Sources," IEEE Transactions, Vol. EI-11, pages 8-11, March 1976. [B19] Harrold, R.T., "Acoustic Waveguides for Sensing and Locating Electrical Discharges in High Voltage Power Transformers and Other Apparatus," IEEE Trans. On PAS, Vol. PAS-98 No. 2, April 1979, pp. 449-457. [B20] Harrold, R.T., "Acoustical Properties of Insulating Liquids and Gases," IEEE International Symposium of Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
32
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 Electrical Insulation, Philadelphia, 1978. [B21] Harrold, R.T., IEEE transactions on Electrical Insulation, Vol. E.I.10. No. 4, December 1975. [B22] Heroux, P., "A Statistical Study of Electrical and Acoustical Characteristics of Pulsative Corona," IEEE paper AT6 122-2, Winter Power Meeting 1976. [B23] Herzfeld, K. F. and Litovitz, T.A., "Absorption and Dispersion of Ultrasonic Waves," Academic Press, New York, pg. 454, 1959. [B24] Howells, E. and Norton, E. T., "Parameters Affecting the Velocity of Sound in Transformer Oil," IEEE Transactions, Vol. PAS-103, pages 1111-1115, May 1984. [B25] Howells, E. and Norton, E., "Detection of Partial Discharges in Transformers Using Acoustic Emission Techniques," IEEE Transactions, PAS 97, No. 5, 1978. [B26] Howells, E., "Acoustic Emission from Stressed Dielectric Liquids," ISA paper no. 74219 Instrumentation Symposium, Albuquerque, 1974. [B27] IEEE C57.113-1991, IEEE Guide for Partial Discharge Measurement in Liquid Filled Power Transformers and Shunt Reactors. [B28] Kawanda, H., Honda, M., Inoe, T. and Amemya, T., "Partial Discharge Automatic Monitor for Oil-Filled Power Transformers," IEEE paper no. 833M424-8, PES Summer Meeting 1983. [B29] Kim, T. Y., Suh, K. S., Nam, J. H. and Takada, T., "Acoustic Monitoring of HV Equipment with Optical Fiber Sensors," IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 266-270, 2003. [B30] Krautkramer, "Ultrasonic Testing of Materials," Springer-Verlag, New York Inc., 1969, pp. 20-23. [B31] Lin, R., Nez, A. and Jimnez L., "On-line ultrasonic diagnosis to prevent catastrophic failures in power transformers," EPRI 2000 Substation Equipment Diagnosis Conference VIII, February 20-23, New Orleans, Louisiana. [B32] Lopez, A., Equihua, H., Lin, R. Alvarez, R. and Nez, A., "Detection of incipient failures on power transformers using on-line non-intrusive diagnosis techniques," IEEE XI Power summer meeting 1998, Acapulco, Mexico. [B33] Lundgaard, L. E., "Partial Discharge-Part XIV: Acoustic Partial Discharge Detection-Practical Application," IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 34-43, 1992. [B34] Meunier, R. and Vaillancourt, G.H., "Propagation behaviour of acoustic partial discharge signals in oil-filled transformers," Conference Record of the International Conference on Conduction and Breakdown in Dielectric Liquids, July 15-19, 1996, Roma, Italy. [B35] Miller, R.K. and Nez, A., "Detect and locate sources of Power Transformers deterioration using high speed Acoustic Emission waveform acquisition with location and pattern recognition," EPRI 2002 Substation Equipment Diagnosis Conference X, February 17-20, San Antonio, Texas. [B36] Miller, R.K., Shu, F., Nez, A. and Ternowcheck, S., "Advances in Acoustic Emission Testing for Detecting, Locating and Assessing Electrical and Thermal Faults," EPRI 2003 Substation Equipment Diagnosis Conference X, February 23-26, New Orleans, Louisiana. [B37] Moore, H.R, Savio, L.J., Chu, D. and Sandstrom, J.E., "Report on Studies of Static Electrification performed on a Service-Aged Transformer," Sixty-Third International Conference of Doble Clients, March 25-29, 1996, Boston MA. [B38] Morel, J.F. and Fallow, B., "Detection and Location of Partial Discharges by Ultrasonics," ERA Transactions 2947, Rev. General Electric, Vol. 80, pages 225-228, 1971. [B39] Noro, A., Nakamura, K., Horii, K., Katsukawa, H. and Matsuoka, R., "Acoustic-Based Real-Time Fault Location in Power Substation," Third International Symposium on Electricity Distribution and Energy Management, ISEDEM Proceedings, vol., pp. 106111, 1993. [B40] Noro, A., Nakamura, K., Watanabe, T. and Morita, T., "Acoustic-Based Real-Time Partial Discharge Location in Model Transformer," Proceedings ICSPAT 1994, pp. 10771082.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
33
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 [B41] Nez, A., "Acoustic Technique for the detection and location of partial discharge in power transformers," Thesis, Instituto Politecnico Nacional-Instituto de Investigaciones Electricas, Mexico, 1999. [B42] Nez, A., Miller, R. K. and Ward, B., "Reduction of failure risk in power transformers through the detection and location of incipient faults using acoustic emission," TechCon 2003 North America, February 3-4, 2003, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA. [B43] "Partial Discharge Detection Using Acoustic Emission Report," Physical Acoustics Corporation, P.O. Box 3135, Princeton, NJ 08543. [B44] PC57-127-2000, Trial Use Guide for the Detection of Acoustic Emissions from Partial Discharges in Oil Immersed Power Transformers. [B45] Phung, B. T., James, R. E., Blackburn, T. R. and Su, Q, "Partial Discharge Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in Steel Transformer Tanks," Proceedings of 7th ISH, Dresden, Germany, Vol. 7, pp. 131-134, 1991. [B46] Reason, John, "Online Transformer Monitoring," Special Report, Electrical World, pp 19-26, October 1995. [B47] Rossi, M., "Acoustics and Electroacoustics," translated by Patrick Rupert, Windsor Roe, Artech House, 1988. [B48] Shertukde, H. M. and Bar-Shalom, Y., "Target Parameter Estimation in the near field with two sensors," IEEE Transactions on Acoustic Speech and Signal Processing, Aug., 1988. [B49] Shertukde, H.M. and Shertukde, R.H., "Monitoring vs. Diagnostics- FAN-EPT: A Novel Tool for On-Line Monitoring and Diagnostics of Large Power Transformers," Proceedings IEEE T&D Conference, Japan, October 7, 2002. [B50] Shertukde, H.M., Alnajjar, H. and Prabhune, U., "Fault Detection Device For Electrical Power Transformers Using Novel DSP Scheme," Proceedings ICPAT '96, pp 1219-1223, October 7-10, 1996, Boston, MA. [B51] Shertukde, R.H. and Shertukde, H.M., "Manufacture of Fault Diagnostic Device for Electrical Power Transformers (FD2EPT)," Proceedings ICSPAT'96, pp 1229-1233, October 7-10, 1996, Boston, MA. [B52] Titto, S., Olata, M. and Saynajakangas, S., "Non-Destructive Magnetic Measurements of Steel Grain Size," Non-Destructive Testing Journal, England, 1976. [B53] Train, D., Mercier, A. and Thorne, D., "The Detection of Partial Discharges in High Voltage Potential Transformers in Service," IEEE Transactions, Vol. PAS-93, pages 1909-1916, November 1974. [B54] Van Brunt, R. J., "Stochastic Properties of Partial-discharge Phenomena," IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation, Vol. 26, No. 5, October 1991. [B55] Vohl, P. E., Gervais, Y. and Mukhedkar, D., "Model Analysis of Pulses Generated by Partial Discharges," IEEE paper no. A76-4168, PES Summer Meeting, 1976. [B56] Von Glahn, P., Stricklett, K.L,, Van Brunt, R. J. and Cheim, L. A. V., "Correlation Between Electrical and Acoustic Detection of Partial Discharge in Liquids and Implications for Continuous Data Recording," IEEE ISEI, Vol. 1, pp. 69-74, 1996. [B57] Wood, J.W., Hickling, G.H., Hindmarch, R.T. and Raju, B.P., "Electrical and Ultrasonic Characteristics of Partial Discharges in Oil Immersed Insulation," IEEE Conference on Dielectric Materials, Measurements and Applications, Cambridge, England, 1975. [B58] Young, R.K., "Wavelet Theory and Its Applications," Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA 1994.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
34
Annex B (Informative)
Signal Processing
To evaluate the source of a PD signal, it is necessary to establish its physical disposition or location within the confines of the transformer. A technique [B43] that is sometimes utilized is based on the presumption that the sensor location resulting in the highest AE oscillation or count rate would be closest to the source. This is not always true because of the attenuation that can be caused due to passage of the sound wave through different insulation materials and copper. Even under most favorable circumstances this technique can only indicate the general zone wherein the source may probably lie. For more accurate location more precise solutions need to be used. Some of the techniques are: a) Time domain: finding the start of a candidate signal in the time domain is the simplest and most reliable approach. b) Cross-Correlation: this requires two channels of data from two acoustic sensor locations, with the data in one channel artificially delayed with respect to the other channel of data. One then attempts to evaluate the Cross-Correlation of these data by multiplying the corresponding data points. When the artificial time delay is equivalent to the real time delay between the two data channels a maximum occurs which indicates the possibility of source location after corresponding mathematical manipulations are conducted. This method is hampered by the necessarily different wave forms recorded at different locations. c) Signal Enhancement: averaging is a very powerful technique for recovering repetitive signals from random noise when there is a stable trigger. In this method, randomness in the signal is reduced to almost zero amplitude while the true repetitive portion of the signal remains unaffected. However, as AE signals vary in amplitude, the degree of enhancement obtained is usually less than that predicted by theory. d) Fast Fourier Transform: the signal can be analyzed in the frequency domain by using suitable Fourier techniques [B39, B48]. This can result in corresponding power spectral densities which can be manipulated mathematically to get the estimate of the time delay and then correspondingly the source location. e) Wavelet Transform: the signal can be analyzed in the frequency as well as the time domain using suitable wavelet transform techniques [B50, B51, B57]. This can result in corresponding wide band cross ambiguity functions with better estimation of the time delay and correspondingly better source location accuracy. These estimated time delays in conjunction with proper signal characteristics (amplitude, signalto-noise ratio and shape) yield better PD source location accuracy. Use of suitable location algorithms is illustrated in Annex C.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
35
Annex C (Informative)
Wavelet Signal Processing Theory
Incipient faults generally occur due to the breakdown of a small part of the transformer insulation, generally caused by the inclusion of moisture or a cavity. This activity results in an instantaneous shunting of a small partial capacitance of the entire insulation. The discharge of this partial capacitance reconfigures the distribution of charges within the insulation instantaneously causing a short current pulse. This activity can continue in a sequence for a while setting up a train of pulses. These pulses can have a particular shape, size and frequency depending upon the spatial arrangement of the inclusion. In the following analysis, wavelet transform techniques are used with data from external sensors to estimate the spatial location of the incipient fault.
sensor 2 r2 (t) sensor 1 r1 (t)
2,s2
sensor3 r3 (t)
3, s3
1, s1
x(t)
0 , s0
sensor 0 r0 (t)
PD SOURCE
sensor i ri(t)
n, sn
sensor n rn (t)
Figure 14 PD source with sensors located on the external surface of the transformer tank Let the PD source be located as shown in Figure 14. The different sensors are located at different positions on the transformer tank. Let ri(t) be the measurements received at the n sensors consisting of the signal corrupted by Gaussian noise, independent and identically distributed, with mean zero and variance
ri (t ) =
t i + ni (t ) x si si = xi (t ) + ni (t )
2
(1)
where
x (t ) = e t e
jwt
(2)
Then the wavelet transform of the reference measurement received at sensor 0 and the measurement at sensor i is given by
Wr0 ri ( s, ) = Wx0 xi ( s, ) =
1 t ri (t )r0 dt s s 1 s
(3)
x (t ) x
i 0
t dt s
(4)
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
36
Wx0 xi ( s, ) =
Since
0 i
s + s 0 i Wx x s 0 , si si s0 si
(5)
Wx x will have a maximum value at (s,) = (1, 0), equation (5) will have a peak when
s= si si and = i s0 s0 0
(6)
t 0 t i and x 0 ( t ) = x xi ( t ) = x si s0
If then
t = t 0
t i = t ( i 0 )
Hence
t ( i 0 ) xi ( t ) = xi ( t + 0 ) = x si
and x 0 ( t ) = x 0 t + 0 = x
(10)
t s0
(11)
Now x 0 ( t ) and xi ( t ) are scaled and delayed versions of x( t ) . In the new time domain, using the scale/delay property of WT, equation 5 will have a peak when
s=
si s0
and
= i 0
(12)
sensor 1 (x1,y1,z1)
sensor 2 (x2,y2,z2) z y
(x,y,z) PD
sensor 0 (x0,y0,z0)
sensor n (xn,yn,zn) x
(0,0,0)
Figure 15 Representation of 3-D transformer tank with sensor locations for calculation of PD source location coordinates
( x x i ) 2 + ( y y i ) 2 + ( z zi ) 2 = C 2 . i 2
From the above equation the location of the PD source (x, y, z) can be easily estimated.
(13)
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
37
Annex D (informative)
Calibration of equipment external to transducer and pre-amplifier
Introduction
The circuitry in the instrument external to the sensor is required to perform the following functions: a) Provide 60 dB of gain to the incoming signal b) Severely attenuate signals outside the frequency range of 100300 kHz c) Produce a 3:1 signal-to-noise ratio for actuation of the pulse counting process The procedure below is designed to verify satisfactory operation.
Equipment required
The following equipment is required: a) Signal generator (with low-output voltage capability) b) Frequency counter c) Precision voltmeter with high-frequency (500 kHz) response capability and preferably peak voltage indication
Procedure
Connect the signal generator to the input of the PD detector. Connect the voltmeter across this input so that it monitors the voltage level of the applied signal. Connect the counter to the output of the signal generator to monitor the frequency of its output. Completion of these checks ensures satisfactory performance of the power amplifier, filter, and signal-to-noise ratio discriminator and counter circuits. a) Adjust the signal generator to supply a 150 kHz sinusoidal signal with peak amplitude of 1 mV b) Set the power amplifier gain to 60 dB 1 dB c) Set the pulse counter circuitry trigger level to 1 V. The instrument display should indicate an oscillation count rate of 150,000 pulses/s d) Raise the instrument counter trigger level to 3.00 V. The counter should now indicate 0. e) Slowly increase the amplitude of the applied signal (still at 150 kHz), noting the voltage necessary to activate the counter circuit and result in a 150,000 pulses/s display. This amplitude should be no less than 3.00 mV and no more than 3.20 mV. f) With the system setup as previously described (3.00 V counting level; 60 dB power amplifier gain; and 3 mV, 150 kHz input), reduce the frequency of the input signal to 100 kHz. The counter should now indicate 0. g) With the same setup, increase the frequency of the input signal to 300 kHz. The counter should again indicate 0. h) Without changing the instrumentation configuration, slowly vary the input signal (at constant 3 mV peak amplitude) over the range of 100300 kHz. Correct indication should only be obtained when the frequency of the input signal is between 120 kHz and 280 kHz.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
38
Annex E (informative)
Calibration of transducer and preamplifier
Introduction
The sensor utilizes a piezo-electric crystal with a nominal resonant frequency of 150 kHz when excited by a longitudinal waveform. The output from the crystal is a very low-amplitude, high-impedance signal that requires processing in a preamplifier before it is useful. The transducer element and preamplifier is to be considered as a complete system, whether they are contained in the same package (as in the preferred shielded single crystal sensor) or as separate units.
Instrumentation required
a) Heavily damped, 5 MHz, ultrasonic, non-destructive testing immersion transducer b) Transducer excitation pulse circuitThis is required to provide a positive going pulse, achieving a peak amplitude of 300 V in 500 ns, and decaying to 0 amplitude in 3 s. The circuit is required to work into a high-impedance load and have a pulse repetition rate of approximately 1 kHz. c) Transient recorderA digital oscilloscope with a 500 ns sampling rate is recommended. d) Spectrum analyzerThis should be capable of analyzing transients and processing signals with a frequency content up to at least 300 kHz. e) Ultrasonic immersion test tank f) Appropriate preamplifier power supply
Procedure
The intent of this procedure is to determine the output of the PD sensor/preamplifier combination to a well-defined longitudinal mechanical pulse. To achieve this, the pulsing circuit excites the ultrasonic (driving) transducer so that it outputs a well-defined mechanical pulse. Having been submerged in water, this pulse propagates exclusively in the longitudinal mode and subsequently excites the sensor being evaluated. The output of the sensor/preamplifier combination is then supplied to a transient recorder where the time-domain record is obtained. At the same time, the signal is supplied to a spectrum analyzer for frequency analysis. a) Connect pulser circuit to ultrasonic (transmitting) transducer b) Connect appropriate power supply to sensor/preamplifier combination c) Connect sensor/preamplifier output to transient recorder and in parallel to the spectrum analyzer d) Set transient recorder sampling period to approximately 500 ns and transient capture trigger level to approximately 2 V e) Set spectrum analyzer in the transient analysis mode and select a frequency range that embraces at least 0250 kHz f) Immerse both driving transducer and discharge detector sensor in the water-filled immersion tank. Ensure that they face each other squarely and are 1617 cm apart. The transducers should be located at least 8 cm away from any reflecting objects such as the tank walls. It is also important to ensure that no bubbles adhere to the face of either the transmitting transducer or sensor.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
39
IEEE PC57.127/D3.0, February 21, 2004 g) Energize transducer excitation pulse circuit and preamplifier power supply. The time-domain signal displayed by the transient recorder should be that of a "burst" made up of many oscillations. The leading oscillations should be high in amplitude with the remainder decaying to zero, similar to that shown in Figure 1. The requirements are that the maximum peak-to-peak voltage be no less than 5.80 V and no higher than 6.20 V. The duration of the burst should be no less than 80 s and no longer than 150 s. (Note: if the duration is longer than 150 s, then it is likely to be mechanical noise rather than partial discharge noise.) To avoid the confusing effects of random noise, it is recommended that the spectrum be enhanced by averaging at least eight separate spectra. The resulting spectrum should show a dominant peak between 120 kHz and 160 kHz. The resonant characteristic of the crystal should be evident by the amplitude of this peak being at least 40 dB and no more than 43 dB above the spectrum reference level. In meeting these criteria, the sensor is shown to have a lightly damped crystal of the correct resonant frequency and the preamplifier is producing the required 40 dB of gain.
Notethe foregoing procedure requires that the PD detection sensor be completely immersed in water. If a sensor that is not suitable for total immersion is used, the same result can be obtained by utilizing a vertical water column. In this case, the driving transducer is located about 8 cm from the bottom of the column, while only the face of the sensing transducer is required to enter the water surface. If this approach is used, the same precautions relative to reflections from the tank sides, avoidance of bubbles, and separation distance between the sensors are still appropriate.
Copyright 2004 IEEE. All rights reserved This is an unapproved IEEE Standard subject to change
40