Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Generally Acceptable Guidelines for Tube Velocities Based on Tube Material Admiralty (general service) up to 6 feet per second Admiralty (fresh water service) up to 8-9 feet per second Carbon Steel 6-9 up to feet per second Copper 6-7 up to feet per second Copper-Nickel (90/10) up to 9 feet per second Copper-Nickel (70/30) up to 15 feet per second Inconel 625 / Hastelloy C-276 maximum 20 feet per second Stainless Steel (304 or 316) up to 12 feet per second Stainless Steel (304L or 316L) up to 15 feet per second Note: As described above, these guidelines are generalized and every application is unique. Consideration to all the factors effecting tube velocity must be considered. Low Tube Velocity: For most fluids in most applications; a lower tube velocity means a lower inside heat transfer coefficient, therefore the heat transfer is less effective, so thermal designers will typically try to keep the velocity as high as the tube material and pressure drop will allow. Similar to high tube velocities, what is considered to be too low of a tube velocity is also dependant on; the fluid, temperature, chemistry and construction. For clean pure fluids, with little or no suspended solids and are not prone to fouling; the goal is to avoid laminar flow. If the inside heat transfer coefficient drops too low, turbulators can be considered. If the tube velocity is below three feet per consideration should be given to the fluid in the tubes. For water applications, see the following section. Effects of Too Low of a Tube Velocity Fouling Corrosion Deposition Low heat transfer coefficient (laminar flow)
Page 1 of 2
Water in Tubes As far as common heat transfer fluids go, water presents interesting challenges because it is a moving target. Whether cooling tower water, river water, lake water, sea water, well water or municipal water; the chemistry, temperature, organic make-up and suspended solids often changes seasonally or more frequently. The changes in the water source needs to be considered when designing a heat exchanger. It is not an uncommon practice to throttle back cooling water when the demand is low or the water is particularly cold (in many cooling applications these circumstances occur at the same time). Since we typically design cooling systems for the most demanding condition, (highest load and warmest water) the water flow may be able to be reduced significantly. The water flow may be reduced such that the tube velocity may end up in the range where fouling or organic growth can occur even though the design tube velocity was in an appropriate range. Operating under even short durations at low flow can have a long term effect on a heat exchanger. Natural water sources, particularly river water, can bring mud, silt or other suspended solid in a heat exchanger. Consideration should be given to ensure the velocity throughout the heat exchanger, including the channels or headers is high enough to carry the solids through the exchanger. As with all heat transfer fluid, if the tube velocity in water applications is below three feet per consideration should be give to the quality of the water in the tubes. A design velocity below three feet per second may be suitable for clean, treated water. If fouling is a concern, selecting a higher fouling factor may be warranted however too high a fouling factor may result in more tubes being required which, in turn, increases the flow area and lowers the water velocity.
Conversely, operating at higher than recommended tube velocities for even short durations can remove the oxide layer that protects the inside of copper tubes making it susceptible to corrosion. The propensity for erosion or tube abrasion can increase at higher tube velocities, particularly at return bends. If the water has higher than normal suspended solids, particularly sand or silt, a design velocity below the recommended maximum for a tube material should be considered.
Click Here for More Information on Fouling in Heat Exchangers Click Here for More Information on Corrosion in Heat Exchangers
Page 2 of 2