Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Page 1 of 12
NOTATION
As Stress area [mm2] Nominal diameter of the bolt (shank) [mm] do Diameter of a hole [mm] Fv Shear force [N] Ft Tensile force [N] Fp Preloading force of a bolt [N] Fs Slip resistance of a preloaded bolt [N] Ma Applied torque [Nmm] k Coefficient of friction between mating surfaces [-] 4 Rotation [degrees] P Slip factor [-] n Number of friction faces [-] Jms Partial safety factors for a slip resistant bolt [-]
1. INTRODUCTION
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013
Page 2 of 12
When a connection is subject to a load reversal or to dynamic loading, a shear connection which acts by shear stress in the bolt and bearing stress in the plates, is not acceptable (Lecture 11.3.1). By pretensioning of the bolts, however, a clamping pressure occurs between the connected parts which enables load to be transferred by frictional resistance. Figure 1 compares the effect of using bearing and preloaded bolts to make-up a double-cover plate butt joint. Until slip occurs the connection which uses preloaded bolts usually termed High Strength Friction Grip (HSFG) bolts - is seen to be much stiffer than that which employs bearing bolts. Once slip occurs the HSFG connection progressively becomes a bearing one and, after the hole clearance has been taken up, both types of connection behave in a similar way.
In the case of bolts in axial tension, preloading improves the fatigue resistance by reducing the effective stress range.
2. LOAD TRANSMISSION
2.1 Friction Connections
Preloaded bolts exert a compressive stress on the connected plates. The compression gives rise to high frictional resistance, which enables load to be transferred between the connected parts. When the applied load F in Figure 2 exceeds the frictional resistance which is developed between the plates, the plates will slip relative to each other allowing the bolt to act in bearing.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013
Page 3 of 12
Bolts which transfer load by friction are known as High Strength Friction Grip (HSFG) bolts. Controlled tightening of the bolts allows the frictional action to be quantified for design. The main advantages of HSFG bolted connections are their greater stiffness and their ability to withstand alternating forces. Their behaviour under fatigue loading is also better than that of bearing bolted connections. Against these advantages are the costs of HSFG bolted connections. The preparation of the friction grip surfaces and the controlled tightening require additional care (training of people). The costs are greater than for bearing connections. As a result, HSFG bolted connections are usually used only where the stiffness of the connection is important, where alternating loading would cause alternating slip, or where fatigue loading is present. Typically HSFG bolts are used in bridges, cranes and crane girders.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013
Page 4 of 12
The relation between the various forces can be illustrated by the "force triangle" in Figure 4. In Figure 4(a) contact is limited to the central region of the bolted connection. There is no increase in bolt force until separation occurs. In Figure 4(b), contact is limited to the edges of the bolted connection. Any external tension will increase the bending in the plate increasing both Fc and 'Fb. Further explanation is provided in Chapter 17 of Reference 1 and in Reference 2.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013
Page 5 of 12
The percentage of the force which is transmitted by an increase in the force in the bolts and the other part which reduces the clamping forces between the plates depends on the elastic behaviour of the connection (see Figure 3). Since the elastic behaviour is the same, the location of the contact pressure produced by tightening of the bolts is of crucial importance with regard to bolt fatigue (see Figure 4).
3. PRELOAD IN BOLTS
In order to make practical use of the friction effect, high tensile steel bolts (usually grade 10.9) are used so that an adequate clamping force can be obtained with reasonably sized bolts. The stress induced in the bolts by the pretensioning is at, or near, the proof stress. The design preloading force of a bolt is given by: Fp.Cd = 0,7 fub . As where As is the tensile stress area of the bolt (see Lecture 11.3.1) and fub the nominal ultimate stress of the bolt.
4. TIGHTENING BOLTS
Three methods of tightening are available:
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013
Page 6 of 12
a. Torque method For this method of tightening a calibrated torque wrench is required which may be hand operated or, for bolts of larger diameters, power operated. The torque applied to the nut (or the head) is used partly to overcome friction between the nut and the surface against which it rotates, and partly - approximately half - to drive the threads up the helix, overcoming the friction between the mating screw surfaces and the resolved component of the axial force. If the geometry of the screw head and the coefficient of friction between the various mating surfaces were known, it would be possible to estimate the tension induced by a given torque. The uncertainties concerning distribution of contact pressures, and the variabilities of coefficients of friction in practice, do not justify the use of anything other than a simple rule such as: Ma = k d Fp (1) where: Ma is the applied torque (Nmm) d is the bolt diameter (mm) Fp is the preload in the bolt (N) k is the coefficient of friction between mating surfaces In practice k values have been measured for new bolts which vary between 0,12 and 0,20. For the as - delivered condition, slightly oiled the ECCS recommendations [3] give k = 0,18 and, for case of the use of the thread lubricant molybdenum sulphide k = 0,14. It may be concluded from the above that the scatter in the preloads obtained will be large (Figure 5). If the coefficient k appears to be very low, there is a danger that the bolt will break. If k is unexpectedly large, then the desired preload will not be obtained.
Therefore, the torque method is not recommended by the ECCS [3] and Eurocode 3 [4]. If it is applied, then it is recommended that tests are carried out before erection. Special devices are available ("bolt force metre") to measure the bolt force as a function of the torque Ma. b. Turn-of-nut method This method is based on a predetermined rotation of the nut. The tightening can be achieved in two ways as follows:
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013
Page 7 of 12
the bolt is first made "hand tight" and then turned further by a specified amount. The contact surfaces must fit snugly before the bolts are tightened. using a percussion wrench, the bolt is first tightened until the plies of the joint achieve a snug fit (when the percussion wrench goes over to hammering), after which the nut is further turned by the amount: 4 = 90q + 6 t + d (2) where: 4 is the rotation in degrees 6 t is the total thickness of connected parts in mm d is the bolt diameter in mm. The purpose of this method is to rotate the nut sufficiently to take the bolt well into the plastic state (Figure 6a). The shank tension is then comparatively insensitive to variation in the nut rotation, while a large reserve exists before rupture occurs.
It should be remembered that the ductility of the bolt largely depends on the length of the threaded portion. Care must be taken with short bolts which have only a small amount of thread in the grip (5 threads is a minimum).
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013
Page 8 of 12
The danger of overloading (breaking) the bolt in the turn-of-nut method is far less than in the torque method. Where the plates are not flat and parallel as indicated in Figure 6b, this method has the disadvantage that the preload will not be reached if the construction worker does not pay enough attention to closing the gaps. A requirement of the method is that the contact surfaces must fit snugly before the bolts are tightened up. c. Combined method (the best) In this method the torque method and the turn-of-nut method are combined. 1. First tighten all bolts to 75% of the full preload, using the torque method. By applying only 75%, the danger of overloading due to an unexpected low friction between nut and thread is acceptably small. At the same time the clamping force is usually large enough to close any gaps between the plates. 2. Then tighten by a further turn of 90q to 120q (the lower value for small bolt lengths and the larger value for large bolt lengths). This method has the advantage that it is not particularly sensitive to: variation in the friction between the nut and the thread. variation in the stiffness of the plate assembly (Figures 5 and 6). By applying the 75% torque, one is more sure that the plates fit snugly than with the turn of nut method. The above is illustrated in Figure 7:
If after preloading to a nominal 0,75 Fp (torque method), the actual preload appears very high, the turn-of-the-nut by 4p gives no danger for rupture. If the actual preload is low, the turn of nut by 4p gives a preload that is high enough for either assembly. In connections with several bolts (Figure 8), it is necessary to tighten the bolts in two stages:
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013
Page 9 of 12
Torque method. First stage: all bolts up to 75% of Ma. Second stage: all bolts to 100% of Ma. Turn-of-nut method. First stage: all bolts "hand tight". Second stage: all bolts a second time "hand tight". Finally the turn-ofthe-nuts. Combined method. First stage: all bolts up to 75% of Ma. Second stage: all bolts a second time up to 75% of Ma. Finally the 90q - 120q turn-of-the-nut. The reason for the above is that after tightening the first bolt up to 75% of Fp or even Fp, the contact surfaces may not fit snugly. The fit depends on the imperfections of the joint (the plates not being flat) and the stiffness of the plates, compared to the preload of the first tightened bolt. If the contact surfaces do not fit snug after the first bolt is tightened, tightening the second bolt will decrease the preload in the first bolt, and so on. By applying the two stage procedure, this effect is reduced to an acceptable level.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013
Page 10 of 12
It would be desirable therefore to design threaded connections so that their mode of failure would always be by shank fracture. Unfortunately, because of the many variables which govern stripping strength (nut and bolt material strengths, thread clearances, across-flats dimensions, etc.), nuts would have to be abnormally thick to guarantee this mode in all cases. Nuts with a width across flats according to ISO 898/2 [5] are used for preloaded bolts. Their nominal height is always greater than the classical value 0.5 d; it is often equal to 0,8 d and it can reach 1,0 d. In this respect an important quality requirement arises. The bolt with its nut in a tensile test as indicated in Figure 9 must have a rupture strength of at least the so-called "proof stress". The proof stress for ISO 898/1 [6] bolts, for instance, differs somewhat from the design values for fub. A hardened steel washer is placed under the part that is rotated (the nut or the head). This leads to a more uniform and not too high friction between the rotated part and the underlying plates. When the bolt axis is not normal to the contact surface (difference of more than 3q), an appropriate taper washer must be used.
6. HOLES
Clearance values are the same as for non-preloaded bolts (see Lecture 11.3.1.). In normal circumstances, the clearance is 2mm for diameters up to and including 24mm and 3mm for larger diameters. To improve the resistance of the connection, holes with smaller clearance than standard holes may be specified. As a result costs will be greater.
7. SLIP RESISTANCE
HSFG bolts in shear connections transmit the force by friction between the contact faces (Figure 1). The resistance of these connections depends on the preload Fp.Cd, the slip factor P and the number of friction faces n. The design slip resistance of a preloaded high strength bolt has a value: Fs,Rd = nPFp.Cd /Jms (3)
The slip factor P depends on the preparation of the surfaces. Some values (1) are: surface not treated P = 0,20
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013
Page 11 of 12
surface blasted with shot or grit, with any loose rust removed, no pitting surface blasted with shot or grit and painted with ethyl-zinc silicate coat (thickness 30 - 60 P m) surface blasted with shot or grit and hot dip galvanised
Painting may be necessary to prevent rust in the period before or during erection. Reference standard 8 of Eurocode 3 [4] gives more details. Figure 2 compares the effect of using bearing and HSFG bolts to make up a double cover plate butt joint. Until slip occurs, the connection which uses HSFG bolts is seen to be much stiffer than that which uses bearing bolts. Once slip occurs, the HSFG connection progressively becomes a bearing connection and, after the hole clearance has been taken up, both connections behave in a similar way. The reason for the large decrease of the force transmitted by friction can be explained by: The decrease of the surface roughness during slip, which gives a decrease in P. The fact that the tensile stresses in the plates around the holes increase when bearing becomes effective, reducing the thickness of the plates (Poisson ratio) and hence decreasing the preload (consider the different longitudinal stress patterns in Figure 1). For bolts in standard nominal clearance holes and for bolts in slotted holts (see Lecture 11.3.3) with the axis of the slot perpendicular to the direction of the load transfer, the partial safety factor Jms is taken as: for the ultimate limit state for the serviceability limit state Jms = 1,25 Jms = 1,10
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013
Page 12 of 12
The control of the value of the slip factor between the connected parts is very important.
11. REFERENCES
[1] Kulak, G. L., Fischer, J. W. and Struik, J. H. A., "Guide to Design Criteria for Bolted and Riveted Joints", 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, 1987. [2] Bouwman, L. P., "Fatigue of Bolted Connections and Bolts Loaded in tension", Delft University of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, Report. 6-79-9, July 1979. [3] European Recommendations for Bolted Connections in Structural Steelwork. European Convention for Constructional Steelwork (ECCS), Publication No. 38, 1985. [4] Eurocode 3: "Design of Steel Structures": Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, CEN, 1992 (see Chapter 6: Connections Subjected to Static Loading, and Chapter 7: Fabrication and Erection). [5] ISO 898/2, International Standard Mechanical Properties of Fasteners. Part 2: Nuts with Specified Proof Load Values. [6] ISO 898/1, International Standard Mechanical Properties of Fasteners. Part 1: Bolts, Screws and Studs. Previous | Next | Contents
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg11/l0320.htm
25/9/2013