On Wednesday, a bench of the Gauhati High Court, comprising judges Iqbal Ahmed A nsari and Indira Shah, set

aside the "impugned" resolution dated April 1, 1963, through which the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had been constituted. Th e judgment practically rendered CBI as an unconstitutional body. Profile of the judges: Iqbal Ahmed Ansari: Son of a legal luminary, Ansari was born in Tezpur (Assam) i n 1954. He joined the Assam Judicial Service in April 1991 and served as distric t and sessions judge. In June 1999, he joined the Gauhati High Court Registry. S ubsequently, he was elevated to the post of judge. On Friday, he was transferred to Patna as judge of the Patna High Court there. Past judgments: In 2005, Ansari had pronounced an important judgment, allowing a minor rape victim to terminate her pregnancy. Though a medical examination conf irmed rape, doctors had refused to terminate the pregnancy, saying the matter wa s "sub judice". SOME PROMINENT CASES UNDER CBI 2G spectrum scam (2010): Inquiry into alleged irregularities in telecom spectrum allocations made during the tenure of telecom ministers A Raja, Dayanidhi Maran and late Pramod Mahajan Coal block allocation scam (2012): Looking into alleged irregularities in coal b lock allocations; cases filed against industrialist Kumar Mangalam Birla and Con gress MP Naveen Jindal Radia tapes (2013): Taped conversation of former lobbyist Niira Radia with sever al honchos and politicians led to 13 cases, ranging from the supply of low-floor buses by Tata Motors to the Tamil Nadu government to the Sasan Ultra Mega Power Project run by an Anil Ambani company Source: Central Bureau of Investigation After the parents of the victim approached a court of a sub-judicial magistrate, the petition was dismissed. Later, they approached the Gauhati High Court. Term ing the case "unusual", Ansari asked the superintendent of the Gauhati Medical C ollege and Hospital to terminate the minor girl's pregnancy, saying if this wasn 't done, it would cause "grave injury to her mental health". In 2010, Ansari, after hearing a writ petition, stayed the Assam governor's orde r on suspension of the NC Hills Autonomous Council in Assam (then in the news fo r a multi-crore scam), and the declaration of a special session of the NC Hills Autonomous Council as illegal. Indira Shah: Born in 1954, Indira Shah was enrolled as an advocate in 1978. She joined the Assam Judicial Service in 1980 and worked in various capacities, acro ss districts. Before she was appointed registrar general of the Gauhati High Cou rt on November 1, 2011, she was a district judge in Jorhat and Kamrup. On March 2, 2012, she was appointed additional judge of the Gauhati High Court. Wednesday's judgment was possibly her most important one so far. Petitioner: The petitioner, Navendra Kumar, is a resident of Delhi. He was a Mahanagar Telep hone Nigam Ltd employee in 2001, when CBI registered a case against him under Se ction 13(1) (d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 198 8, in the office of the superintendent of police, CBI, in Silchar (Assam). After investigating the case, CBI presented a chargesheet on November 25, 2004, in the court of the special judge, CBI, Guwahati. In 2005, Kumar filed a writ petition in the Gauhati High Court, questioning the

constitutional validity of the formation of the CBI and its powers to carry out functions of the police - registering a first information report (FIR), under Se ction 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; arresting a person as an accused; i nvestigation of offences; filing of charge sheets against alleged offenders; and prosecuting them were challenged. Kumar had asked the court to "quash the impugned Resolution No. 4/31/61-T, dated 01-04-1963, as ultra vires the Constitution of India, by way of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari and (ii) quash the criminal proceeding/prosecution originated from the FIR/RC No. 39(A)/2001/CBI/SIL pendin g against the petitioner in the court of special judge (CBI) for Assam at Guwaha ti, by way of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorar i". In 2007, a single judge dismissed his petition, following which he filed a writ appeal in the high court in 2008. A judgment on this was pronounced by the court on November 6. However, while ter ming CBI as "unconstitutional" and quashing the chargesheet against the petition er submitted by CBI, the court said that wouldn't bar further investigation by t he police with jurisdiction over the subject matter.