The idea that static analysis is but the dynamic analysis with infinite tine step is correct; but

that does not still make it a dynamic problem! What is, then, a dynamic problem? The primary feature of a dynamic problem is the resistance developed or the equilibration of the time-dependent applied loads, by static, inertial and damping forces developed in the structure (Inertial forces proportional to acceleration and viscous-damping forces proportional to velocity). The latter two forces, which come in to effect or activated if and only if there is a significant acceleration and velocity fields induced to the structure due to dynamic or time-dependent nature of the applied loads. We solve dynamic equilibrium equations to determine the displacement, velocity and acceleration fields developed in the structure. In the absence of inertial and damping forces the applied loads are equilibrated exclusively by the internal forces developed in the structure due to elastic (or even plastic) response of the structure. Load applied in infinite time does not produce any inertial or damping forces as the acceleration or velocity during such an application would be zero. Static response would, however, depend on the type of strain displacement relations used and the constitutive model deployed for the structural material, and the boundary or support types. The strain displacement relations could be simply linear one under infinitesimal deformations; first-order nonlinear strains due to large rotations, or even finite strains due to finite deformations with no limit on the strain or deformation values. Each model has its application in various types of problems, and is time and cost intensive depending on the choice. The constitutive or stress-strain relations could be linearly-elastic, non-linearly elastic, perfectly plastic and plastic with strain hardening and even may include Bauschinger effect, and what have you. The development of numerical and finite element techniques to handle any combination of these models for structural and material behaviour has reached industry standard; and today one can simulate any realistic structural behaviour, but one needs a clear understanding of the principles behind the choice of the solution options and their limitations. The use of the SW as a black box leads nowhere; one may generate numbers after lot of effort and wonder later if they mean anything and if so what do they mean and can one clear a design based on the analysis results. One needs to master the continuum mechanics if ones vision is set on the horizon beyond linear elastic behaviour! S. Sridhara Murthy