ITS610 Ethical, Social and Professional Issues

PRESENTATION RUBRIC (10%)

Semester July Sept 2012

Format/Style Visual presentation of the material; clarity of voice; Time requirement.

POOR 1-3 points Goes significantly under or over the time-frame allotted. Aesthetic presentation is poor. Limited amount of visual information. The presenters voices are difficult to understand. Presenters are distracting (Pacing, stumbling over words). 1-3 points The talk addresses poorly the key issues in the topic. The provided information is not necessary or not sufficient to discuss the research. All items are not completely addressed. No visible interest was observed from the audience (questions not really relevant). 1-3 points The presentation slides contain errors. The talk flows poorly, lacks clarity and/or does not present ideas in a coherent way. Presenters not prepared. Overall quality of the presentation is poor.

Content/Information The significant elements of the topic are addressed and issues raised; All items are covered; Description and level of information on research papers.

GOOD 4-6 points Follows, for the most part, the time requirement. Aesthetic presentation pleasing and easy to follow. Visual information augments talk. Presenters have a clear voice that is easy to understand. There are few distractions from the presenters. 4-6 points The talk for the most part addresses the key issues associated with the research presented. The provided information is, for the most part, necessary and sufficient to discuss the research. All items are completely covered. The audience's interest was somewhat raised.

EXCELLENT 7-10 points Closely follows the time requirement. The aesthetic presentation is superior and well thought out. Content of visual information highly augments the talk. Presenters have a clear, understandable voice with no distractions.

7-10 points The talk addresses exceptionally well the key issues in the research. The provided information is enlightens the audience and provides them with a much deeper understanding of the topic. All items are covered in depth. The audience's interest was raised and they were engaged in discussion (relevant questions asked).

Quality of Presentation Quality of information presented; Organization and coherence of ideas; Cohesiveness of the group. Overall presentation.

4-6 points The slides lack any obvious errors. The talk flows well, is clear and presents ideas in a coherent way. Presenters are prepared. Overall quality of the presentation is good.

7-10 points The slides are well designed throughout the presentation finish, without errors. The talk flows seamlessly, clearly and presents research information in a coherent way. Presenters are highly prepared and it is apparent that they have practiced their delivery. Overall quality of the presentation is excellent.

ITS610 Ethical, Social and Professional Issues

PRESENTATION RUBRIC (10%)

Semester July Sept 2012

WEIGHTAGE Format/Style Visual presentation of the material; clarity of voice; Time requirement. Content/Information The significant elements of the topic are addressed and issues raised; All items are covered; Description and level of information on research papers. Quality of Presentation Quality of information presented; Organization and coherence of ideas; Cohesiveness of the group. Overall presentation. 3 5 2

POINTS

MARKS

TOTAL MARKS STUDENTS NAME 1) 2) 3) REMARKS: MATRIC NO.

/100

LECTURER NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE: