Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Medical ethics
Medical ethics is grounded in philosophical ethics, it concerns itself with the ethical questions and dilemmas in medicine. Medical ethics is not any special ethics but an ethics which deals with special cases from medical practice.
Doctor-patient relationship
Medical ethics has three centres: doctor, patient and society. Its centre is the doctor-patient relationship.
The duty The duty health The duty The duty The duty The duty The duty The duty
to help, cure to promote and protect the patients to to to to to to inform confidentiality protect the patients life respect the patients autonomy protect privacy respect the patients dignity
to to to to to to to
high quality medical service autonomous choice decide be informed privacy health education dignity
An obligation of nonmaleficence and an obligation of beneficence are both expressed in the Hippocratic oath: I will use treatment to help the sick according to my ability and judgement, but I will never use it to injure or wrong them.
The principle of nonmaleficence asserts an obligation not to inflict harm intentionally. Principles of beneficence potentially demand more than the principle of nonmaleficence, because agents must take positive steps to help others, not merely refrain from harmful acts.
Beneficence One ought to prevent evil or harm One ought to remove evil or harm One ought to do or promote good
The word autonomy is derived from the Greek autos (self) and nomos (rule, governance or law). It was first used to refer to the self-rule or self-governance of independent Hellenic city-states. Autonomy has since been extended to individuals and has acquired meanings as diverse as selfgovernance, liberty rights, privacy, individual choice, freedom of the will, causing ones behaviour, and being ones own person.
Autonomous person
We analyze autonomous persons in tems of liberty (independence from controlling influences) agency (capacity for intentional action)
Autonomous action
We analyze autonomous action in terms of persons who act Intentionally With understanding Without controlling influences that determine their action
through the account of autonomous choice. A person must do more than express agreement or comply with a proposal. He/she must authorize through an act of informed and voluntary consent. in terms of the social rules of consent in institutions that must obtain legally valid consent from patients or subjects before proceeding with therapeutic procedures or research.
Inability to express or communicate a preference or choice. Inability to understand ones situation and its consequences. Inability to understand relevant information. Inability to give a (rational) reason. Inability to give risk/benefit related reasons. Inability to reach a reasonable decision.
Paternalism
Defined as the intentional overriding of one persons known preferences or actions by another person, where the person who overrides justifies the action by the goal of benefiting or avoiding harm to the person whose will is overriden.
Weak paternalism
In weak paternalism an agent intervenes on ground of beneficence or nonmaleficence only to prevent substantially nonvoluntary conduct, i.e. to protect persons against their own substantially nonautonomous actions.
Strong paternalism
Strong paternalism involves interventions intended to benefit a person despite the fact that the persons risky choices and actions are informed, voluntary and autonomous.
To each person equity) To each person To each person To each person To each person To each person exchanges
an equal share (formal according according according according according to to to to to need effort contribution merit free-market
E-Textbook Medical Ethics Today: The BMAs handbook of ethics and law Books; 3 edition (January 30, 2012) Updates http://bma.org.uk/practical-support-at-work/ethics/medical-ethics-today Best Price $148.33 or Buy New $181.49