NOTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CLAIM ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY OF Verd Jene

CREDITOR-SECURED PARTY
FILE # VJ0001

Verd Jene , Creditor Secured Party

Washington county
The state of Utah
united States of America 1776 AD
Petition for Agreement and Harmony in the Nature of a
NOTICE OF INTERNATIONAL
COMMERCIAL CLAIM
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY
File # VJ0001
Date: January 17, 2002
Declarant:

Verd Jene , Lawful Man/Creditor/Secured Party,

Notary acceptance
Darla A. XXX
225 N. Bluff
St. George, Utah 84770

Respondents: Ronald A
Dept. of Neurosurgery
3B332 Medical Center Room3B409
50 North Medical Drive
Salt Lake City, Utah 84132
CEO
UNIVERSITYY OF UTAH MEDICAL CENTER
DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGY
50 North Medical Drive
Salt Lake City, Utah 84132

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY PROCEDURE

Declarant by visitation is hereby exhausting his administrative remedies by Notice for
Ronald A and CEO UNIVERSITY OF UTAH MEDICAL CENTER, Respondents.
As an operation of law Declarant is required to exhaust his administrative remedies.
As with any administrative process, Respondent(s) may controvert the statements and/or
claims made by Declarant by executing and delivering a verified response point by point,
in affidavit form sworn and attested to, signed by respondent with evidence in support.
Respondent(s) may agree and admit to all statements and claims made by Declarant by
TACIT PROCURATION by simply remaining silent.
ESTOPPEL BY ACQUIESCENCE: In the event Respondent(s) admits the statements
and claims by TACIT PROCURATION, all issues are deemed settled STARE DECISIS
and Respondent may not, cannot, and will not argue, controvert, or otherwise protest the
herein administrative findings, in any subsequent process or the finality thereof, whether
administrative or judicial.
Respondent(s) is granted 10 days to respond to the statements and claims herein and/or to
provide Respondents own answers to inquiries

DEFINITIONS
The term Affiant means Verd Jene, living flesh and blood actual man, non-legal fiction
creditor and secured party, Declarant.
The term Respondents means Ronald A and CEO UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
MEDICAL CENTER.
The term Declarant means Verd Jene , living flesh and blood lawful man, non legalfiction, creditor and secured party, Affiant.
The term Notice means Notice of International Commercial Claim Administrative
Remedy.
The term VERD JENE or any derivative thereof means non-living, non-flesh and
blood, legal fiction, commercial strawman.
The term Verd Jene means a living flesh and blood lawful man, not a commercial
strawman, not a business partner, not a beneficiary, not a surety, not a liable party of any

legal fiction entity, a creditor and secured party, a natural, actual man who is not a 14th
Amendment person or entity under the United States Constitution and its Amendments.
MAXIMS
All men and women know that the foundation of law and commerce exists in the telling
of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Truth as a valid statement of reality is sovereign in commerce.
An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.
An unrebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgment in commerce.
GuaranteedAll men shall have a remedy by the due course of law. If a remedy does
not exist, or if the existing remedy has been subverted, then one may create a remedy for
themselves and endow it with credibility by expressing it in their affidavit.
Notice of agent is notice to principal; notice to principal is notice to agent.

COMMERCIAL OATH AND VERIFICATION

Washington county
The State of Utah

)
)
)
)

Commercial Oath
Verified Declaration

Declarant, Verd Jene , on his Commercial Oath with unlimited liability, proceeding in
good faith, being of sound mind states: the facts contained herein are true, correct, and
complete and not misleading to the best of Declarants private first hand knowledge and
understanding So-help-me-God under penalty of International Commercial Law. Verd
Jene will also sign by accommodation on behalf of VERD JENE , SSN xxx-xx-xxxx
_______________________________________
Verd Jene
The State of Utah
Washington county

}
} ss
}

Sworn and subscribed before me, _________________________________ a Notary

Public, this day of ____________________________, 2001.
____________________________________
NOTARY

STATEMENT OF FACTS

1.
2.
3.

4.
5.
6.

7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.

14.

15.

Declarant is not one in the same as any legal fiction entity, 14th Amendment
person, individual, commercial strawman or number created by the federal
government.
Declarant has never knowingly, willingly and for certain and fair consideration
entered into any contract that would controvert Declarants private, natural
character status.
Declarant is not a beneficiary, surety, liable party or otherwise business partner
for any legal fiction entity or number created by any corporation or the federal
government, and has never knowingly, willingly, and for certain and fair
consideration, every entered into any contract that would controvert Declarants
claim on non-surety status.
Declarant has a non-privity relationship with all legal fiction entities.
VERD JENE (or any derivative thereof) is not void of an exclusive aggregate
relationship with the Declarant.
Verd Jene has not failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as
evidenced on the commercial registry at the Secretary of State of Wyoming at
Cheyenne WYOMING, in the form of a UCC-1 and its amendments (see
attached).
Declarant is not one in the same as any artificial, legal 14th Amendment person,
individual, commercial strawman, corporate organization and/or trust created by
the Local, State or Federal Government.
Declarant is not the beneficiary, surety, liable party for any legal fiction entity, in
particular VERD JENE nor any artificial entity derived therefrom.
Declarant admits to an aggregate relationship between Verd Jene and VERD
JENE .
Declarant has a non-privity and non-privilege relationship with VERD JENE.
Verd Jene has a privity relationship with Terry.
Declarant is not a surety for any legal fiction entity, and has never knowingly,
willingly, and for certain and fair consideration, ever entered into any contract
that would controvert Declarants claim or non-surety status.
By and through this commercial notice, the Declarant notices the Respondents,
their co-partners, and the Public that: by mistake Declarant has moved in good
faith to try to comprehend and remedy a mistake caused by Declarants misplaced
trust and inability to comprehend the motives of the Respondent(s).
On or about June 1996, Declarant discussed the condition of Terrys, wife of Verd
Jene, hereafter Terry, condition with the Respondent by telephone and was
advised to bring Terry to the Respondent at the Neurosuregy Clinic in the
University of Utah Medical Center at Salt Lake City, Utah, as soon as possible,
and Declarant was asked by Resondent to bring all of the films and test results
that were done in St. George by the doctors in St. George.
Terry was brought to the University of Utah Medical Center on the 1st of
June1996 by the Declarant and Monica, daughter of Declarant and Terry. The
Declarant gave the films consisting of and MRI and flat x-rays to the Resident at
the University of Utah Medical Center, who had been paged at the arrival of
Declarant and Terry. In short time the Respondent arrived, and looked at the at
the MRI and the X-rays brought from St. George, Utah, by Declarant. Using an

16.

17.

18.

19.
20.

21.

anatomical model of the cervical spine, the Respondent showed the Declarant,
Terry and Monica how he would have to place a pedicle screw on both sides of
Terrys spinal column to stabilize C-1 and C-2. The Respondent said that they
would harvest bone from Terrys hip to fuse at the same time to help stabilization.
Terry was scheduled for surgery two days later.
The Respondent told the Declarant on the day of surgery that the surgery should
require about two and one half-hours to harvest the bone from the hip and fuse the
spineous process of c-1 and c-2 and place the two pedicle screws at the sights he
had shown the Declarant on the day of the Exam.
The Respondent asked the Declarant to wait in the surgical waiting room for the
two and one half hours that the Respondent estimated the surgery would take and
that he, the Respondent would be out to speak with the Declarant after the
surgery.
Five and one-half hours later, the Respondent came to the waiting room to tell the
Declarant that a problem had been encountered. The Respondent was unable to
place the pedicle screw on the right side of C-1 and C-2 due to a physical
malformation of Terrys bones. Respondent stated that he put in one very large
screw on the left side so that it could do a better job. The Respondent told the
Declarant that Terry would get along fine in spite of only one screw being placed
since bone taken from her hip had been placed as a bone graft.
Terry was placed in the Neuro-surgery Intensive Care Unit, hereafter NICU, in
spite of Respondents assurance that Terry would be sent to the neuro-surgery
ward at the University of Utah Medical Center.
The Declarant had not seen Terry since Terry had gone into surgery early that
morning. Declarant was finally able to see Terry in NICU late that evening. The
Declarant leaned over the bed and as Declarant looked at Terrys face to speak to
Terry, the Declarant found Terrys face covered in dried blood, and Terrys hair
was a solid mass with dried blood in it. Finding a wash cloth in the restroom,
Declarant attempted to wash Terrys face. A male nurse panicked and came
running toward the Declarant and forbade any touching or cleaning of Terrys
face or body in any way. Terrys face was covered with dried blood apparently as
a result of that mornings surgery. Around three A.M. Terry told the Declarant to
go to the motor-home and get some rest, that Terry felt safe to be alone.
During the day after surgery the Declarant arrived to be with Terry. The
Declarant found Terry in good spirits and feeling some pain but it was tolerable.
The Declarant was advised by a hospital attendant to leave Terrys room as Terry
was going to x-ray. Terry asked that the Declarant might be able to come with
Terry. The Declarant was forbidden by a hospital attendant to accompany Terry.
The Declarant went down to the cafeteria for breakfast. When the Declarant
returned to the NICU room the Declarant found Terrys face had been cleaned.
Terry was in excruciating pain and very, very cold and shivering uncontrollably.
Terry told the Declarant that Terry had not been allowed to move from the gurney
to the x-ray table. Terry told Declarant that Terry had asked the staff if Terry
could help herself over to the x-ray table. The attendant told Terry that Terry
was not allowed to move, she was to always lay still. Terry was told not to
worry, that the staff had plenty of people to help lift Terry over to the x-ray table.

22.

23.
24.

25.

Then about six to eight men and women lifted Terry with the sheet Terry was on
over to the x-ray table, they moved the top of the table back to an x-ray tube. The
staff took their x-rays and Terry stayed there while the staff developed the x-rays.
Six to eight men and women came back to put Terry back on the gurney. All of
the men and women were laughing at a joke. The men and women were not
paying attention as all were laughing. Terry had no range of motion to see at her
feet. When the top of the table was being pushed back down to the base of the
table the staff pushed too much and the back of the Philadelphia Neck Collar that
was around Terrys neck caught on the rim of the table. The staff kept pulling
Terrys feet, and when Terry screamed out in pain, the laughing stopped.
Someone yelled Oh Shit. Terry was crying in pain and threw-up all over the
bedding and part of the staff. The staff was scrambling and apologizing over and
over. The staff quickly got the bloody, now vomit-covered, sheet out from under
Terry and a clean one put back under Terry. The staff washed the vomit and blood
from Terrys face and far down the collar. Terry cried and shivered in pain and
from then on, Terrys pain was uncontrollable.
Declarant alerted the attendant in NICU that Terry was in extreme pain, and
Declarant attempted to obtain some pain relief for Terry. Declarant was told that
Terry should not be in much pain, and the request of Declarant for the relief of
Terrys pain was refused by the order of the Respondent. Declarant was not
aware whether or not Respondent had been informed of the rough treatment of the
staff at the x-ray room.
Terry was sent to the ward after two days in NICU. Pain medications were not
increased, as according to the Respondent, Terry could not possibly be in as much
pain as claimed.
Terrys niece, Beverly, a nurse at LDS Hospital came to visit Terry. Beverly was
shocked to see the pain Terry was in. The nurses on the ward let Beverly read
Terrys chart. Beverly was shocked at Terrys high blood pressure and other
signs and symptoms. Beverly was alarmed, and immediately called the Chronic
Pain Control Unit. When the Chronic Pain Control Unit arrived they assessed
Terry and immediately administered a morphine pump so Terry could get some
relief. Beverly also saw from the chart that the hygiene duties due to Terry had
not been performed.. The Declarant told Beverly that Terrys bed had not been
changed, and that Terrys hair had not been combed and still had cakes of blood
in it, and that Terrys gown had not been changed, and that Terrys catheter bag
was over capacity. The Declarant told Beverly that Respondent had not been to
see Terry since the surgery, and that nursing care had been sparse. In fact the
Declarant had been to find nurses to empty an already overfilled catheter bag at
least twice a day. The Declarant told Beverly that Declarant had been instructed
by ward staff to keep his hands off of Terry. The Declarant also told Beverly
that he, the Declarant, dare not even brush his wifes teeth.
On the day Terry was to be discharged, Terry was still wearing the collar applied
to Terrys neck on the day of surgery, as the hospital attendants were told
apparently by Respondent not to touch Terry. The Respondent entered Terrys
room for what the Declarant believes to be the first time since Terry was moved
into the ward. The Respondent, speaking to Terry asked who in the hell told

26.

27.

you to be wearing that damn collar? Terry told Respondent that you did. The
Respondent then removed the collar and threw it (the collar) against the wall. The
Respondent examined the wound sights. The Respondent wrote the discharge
orders, and prescribed pain medication, apparently now acknowledging Terrys
pain after the Chronic Pain Control Unit had made a fuss over the lack of
attention for Terry. The Respondent asked the ward nurse to administer the
medications Respondent wanted Terry to have in order for the Declarant to get
Terry home to St. George, Utah. Terry had orders from Respondent to go home
to St. George, Utah, to recover, and later to return to see Respondent at the
University of Utah Medical Center in Salt Lake City, Utah, on July 11, 1996, for a
post-op exam.
Prior to Terry being seen on the July 11,1996 appointment, Terry was sent to
Radiology to have current x-rays taken. The films and the report were given to
Terry to take to Terrys appointment with the Respondent. While walking to
Clinic 8 (Neurology) Terry stopped to read the radiologist report which read Old
films not available. C-2 screw still does not appear to pass through C-1 lateral
mass. C-1 dens distance about 5mm. Small, about 2mm separation of bone graft
from c-1 spinous process. Terry was confused, and asked the male attendant
behind the desk if the male attendant would copy this for Terrys personal
records. Within 20 minutes Terry was in an exam room and the Respondent was
putting the films up on the viewing screen. Respondent went through each one
shaking his head methodically at each one. When Respondent finished viewing
the x-ray films, Respondent said all looked well. Terry told Respondent about the
extreme pain and told Respondent about Terrys left foot not working sometimes,
causing falls. Respondent made a remark about the cane and about Terrys
weight gain. Respondent told Terry to exercise more to get the weight off and to
get off all of the narcotics Terry was using for pain as it was Respondents
opinion that Terry could not be experiencing the amount of pain that Terry
claimed to have had. Terry assured Respondent from first hand knowledge that
Terry had a very high pain threshold and that Terry was, in fact, in extreme pain.
Then Terry brought up the radiologist report that Respondent had not shared with
Terry and Declarant. Terry told Respondent that Terry had a copy and the
radiologists report and that it seemed to agree with some of the radiologist report
in St.George. The respondent got very defensive and defamed the radiologists
and the radiologists reports. An argument ensued. Terry told Respondent that
Terry was angry that Respondent had not told the truth, for hiding the facts, for
not believing Terrys report of pain, and for not believing that Terrys left leg
was floppy and that falls were common. Respondent suggested that if Terry
was in so much pain it would behoove Terry to come up to the University of Utah
Pain Clinic for a month of treatment. The Respondent ordered a mid-September
return for follow up exam.
Terry went for her initial exam at the pain clinic at the first available opportunity,
but could not afford the $10,000.00 fee, hotel accommodations and transpiration
for a month of therapy. During Terrys four-hour visit at the clinic one of the
Doctors reported that the Respondent had worked hard to get the pain clinic open,

28.

and Respondent had a financial interest in it, and that the Respondent apparently
wanted the pain clinic to succeed.
At the September appointment with Respondent Terry again went to radiology for
follow up films. The x-rays (with no reports) were sent with Terry to clinic 8
(Neurology). The Respondent greeted Terry very warmly. The x-rays were
handed over to the Respondent. Respondent mounted the x-rays on the view
screen in an exam room and spent the next 15 minutes trying to show Terry that
there was indeed bone being laid down and that the fusion was indeed
happening. Terry reported continuation of falling down, and that Terry was still
in extreme pain in the neck and the base of the skull. The Respondent asked if
Terry had gone to the Pain Clinic and Terry said. No, the insurance would not
cover it and that I could not afford that type of fee, and that I had no where to stay
and no one to drive me to and from the clinic. Terry told Respondent about the
horrific manual manipulations done at the pain clinic by the staff to Terrys head
and neck and how that pain had almost caused Terry to pass out, and that the
manipulations made Terry throw up. Terry told Respondent that the actions of the
staff at the pain clinic caused Terry to fear for her well being if in the care of the
staff at the pain clinic. Terry expressed hope that there would be some relief
found with another type of therapy in the St. George, Utah, area. The Respondent
requested to see Terry in January 1997.

STATEMENTS AND INQUIRIES

1.
Respondent(s) admits Declarant is not one in the same as any artificial, legal
fiction entity 14th Amendment person, individual, commercial strawman, co-party
organization and/or trust created by the Local, State or Federal Government.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
2.
Respondent(s) admits Declarant has never knowingly, willingly and for certain
and fair consideration entered into any contract that would controvert Declarants
private, natural character status.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
3.
Respondent(s) admits Declarant is not the beneficiary, surety, liable party for any
legal fiction entity or number created by any corporation or the federal
government.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
4.
Respondent(s) admits Declarant has a non-privity relationship with VERD JENE.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
5.
Respondent(s) admits Declarant has a privity relationship with Terry.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
6.
Respondent(s) admits Declarant has never knowingly, willingly and for certain or
fair consideration entered into any contracts contraverting Declarants claim of
non-surety status.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
7.
Respondent(s) admits that any and all contracts between Respondent(s) and
Declarant are void of full disclosures, evidence and truth.
ANSWER: [Admit/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]

8.

Respondent(s) admits Declarant is void of comprehension due to willful deceit by

Respondent(s).
ANSWER: [Admit/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
9.
Respondent(s) admits to bad faith exercised in the care and medical treatment of
Terry.
ANSWER: [Admit/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
10.
Respondent(s) admits Ronald A. is a commercial enterprise using commercial law
in license to practice medicine.
ANSWER: [Admit/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
11.
Respondent(s) admits UNIVERSITY OF UTAH MEDICAL CENTER is a
commercial enterprise using commercial law in corporation in STATE OF
UTAH.
ANSWER: [Admit/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
12.
Respondent(s) admits to negligence in the medical care of Terry.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
13.
Respondent(s) admits to injury of Terry in moving her from x-ray table to gurney.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
14.
Respondent(s) admits to failure to adequately treat pain in Terry.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
15.
Respondent(s) admits to intentionally misleading Terry in regards to the lack of
healing of Terrys neck.
ANSWER: [Admit/Acknowledge, if no answer is proveded.]
16.
Respondent(s) admits to failure to treat Terrys floppy left foot.
ANSWER: [Admit, Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
17.
Respondent(s) admits to conflict of interest in recommending costly treatment at a
pain clinic under Respondents control.
ANSWER: [Admit/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
18.
Respondent(s) admits that pain clinic under control of Respondent caused distress
and injury to Terry.
ANSWER: [Admit/Acknowlege, if no answer is provided.]
19.
Respondent(s) admits their injury on Terry, and that their injury of Terry must be
dealt with. The Declarant must be paid.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
20.
Respondent(s) admits it is mandatory to place themselves under unlimited liability
commercial oath to secure integrity in their responses.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
21.
Respondent(s) admits that if and when the herein Statement and Inquiries is
answered, Respondent(s) answer will only be valid with the Social Security
Number or Tax Identification Number of the party answering attached, since
Declarant is providing the social Security Number for VERD JENE.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge, if no answer is provided.]
ACCOUNTING AND TRUE BILL

10

The injury to Terry will be of life-time endurance with no perceivable relief available.
Value of injury to Terry is set at Thirty million dollars and zero cents ($30,000,000.00)
payable on demand. Demand for payment is now made.
Respondent(s) must Pay To Verd Jene the sum certain Thirty million and zero cents
($30,000,000.00) in functional currency of the United States upon receipt of this bill.
Surety for this sum certain is the operational and functional bonds of the Respondent(s).
In the event that the operational and functional bonds of Respondent(s) are not sufficient
to cover the whole amount of Thirty million and zero cents ($30,000,000.00) in
functional currency of the United States, Respondent(s) agree to the foreclosure and
liquidation of personal assets to satisfy the remaining amount (not to include items
normally excluded and survival provisions).
This bill is not dischargeable in bankruptcy.
This bill is non-negotiable.
NOTICE TO RESPOND
Declarant grants Respondent ten (10) days, exclusive of the day of receipt to respond to
the statements, claims, and inquiries above. Failure to respond will constitute as an
operation of Law, the admission of Respondent by tacit procuration to the statement,
claims and answers to inquires shall be deemed RES JUDICATA, STARE DECISIS.
Failure to respond will constitute an Estoppel by Acquiescence. It is also mandatory that
if Respondent responds to the foregoing it must be by delivering any response to
Affiants Notice of International Administrative Remedy to Affiants mailing location by
United States Postal Certified Mail, addressing Affiant exactly as shown below:
Verd Jene
Notary acceptance
Darla A.
225 N Bluff
St. George, Utah 84770
It is mandatory that Respondent sign and certify under penalty of perjury
complete with SSN number (or TIN) under the laws of the United States of America
under 28 USC 1746, all answers or any other correspondence in response to Affiants
Notice of Administrative Remedy, so that Affiant can know that Affiant is dealing with
the Respondent(s) and that Respondent(s) is held to only those answers that are true,
correct, complete, and not misleading and further;
That any facts alleged in Respondents response must be of first hand knowledge in
affidavit form properly sworn and subscribed to.

11

Further Declarant saith naught.

Given under my hand and seal this the ____day of the _______month of 2002 anno
Domini.
Witness: ____________________________________
Witness: ____________________________________
Prepared and submitted by: _____________________________________________
Declarant

Right Thumb print

12