Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DOI 10.1007/s10526-005-5272-0
Johann G. ZALLER
Institute of Organic Agriculture, University of Bonn
Current address: Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Applied
Life Sciences Vienna, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, A-1180, Vienna, Austria
e-mail: johann.zaller@boku.ac.at
Introduction
Site description
Experimental setup
Plant measurements
Soil samples were collected using a soil corer (diameter 2 cm) from
three locations in a circle of about 5 cm distance to the measured
R. obtusifolius plant at 0–10 cm soil depth immediately after plant
measurements. These samples were pooled, air-dried, sieved (<2 mm)
and analysed for soil pH (glass electrode, 1:10 mass/vol CaCl2
suspension), nitrate-N, ammonium-N concentrations. Nitrate-N and
ammonium-N was analysed on 1% K2SO4 extracts using a continu-
ous flow method on a photometer (type 6010; Skalar, Breda, The
Netherlands; Hoffmann, 1991).
Statistical analyses
Results
Discussion
removal may account for this effect. Other research which shows that
R. obtusifolius can be better controlled through higher cutting fre-
quencies than through less frequent cuttings (Courtney, 1985; Niggli
et al., 1993; Hopkins and Johnson, 2002) indirectly confirms this.
Because R. obtusifolius is known as a nitrophilous grassland weed,
it was expected that its regeneration and growth is a function of soil
nitrate-N and ammonium-N. Generally there was a slight correlation
between maximum plant height and number of leaves of regenerated
R. obtusifolius plants with either soil nitrate and soil ammonium con-
centrations. However, despite differences in regeneration between
grazed and cut plots, soil nitrate-N and ammonium-N concentrations
in the vicinity of regenerated R. obtusifolius plants was similar. This
suggests that nutrients for regeneration were rather derived from the
remaining roots and rhizomes than from the soil.
Sheep grazing also affected the abundance of R. obtusifolius
plants in grassland plots: in grazed plots almost three times more
R. obtusifolius disappeared during the course of this investigation
than in cut plots. This could also be the consequence of the continu-
ous removal of newly regenerating plant tissue through sheep graz-
ing which could have depleted the reserves of R. obtusifolius and
finally prevented further development of R. obtusifolius individuals.
These results are especially interesting because mainly medium and
larger-sized R. obtusifolius plants disappeared after grazing and could
be explained that our sheep especially chose older R. obtusifolius
plants to meet their high demand of fibre material.
Sheep grazing lead to significantly denser swards with more
grasses, less legumes and less vegetation-free gaps than mowing.
Because R. obtusifolius actively colonizes bare patches in pastures
(Nemoto et al., 1983) and clonal growth is the usual regenerative sys-
tem in swards (Pino et al., 1995), denser swards due to sheep grazing
can prevent the germination and seedling establishment of this weed
species. Additionally, this could indirectly also control R. obtusifolius
through improving the competitive ability of co-occurring plant spe-
cies and reduce germination sites for R. obtusifolius seeds (Panetta
and Wardle, 1992). There is also evidence that a dense sward can lim-
it the growth and establishment of R. obtusifolius from seedlings (e.g.,
Jeangros and Nösberger, 1990) and it could additionally be shown
that the competitive ability of R. obtusifolius regenerating from rhi-
zome fragments could also be significantly altered by management
strategies focussing on improved grassland species performance
(Zaller, 2004a). It remains to be investigated whether R. obtusifolius
REGENERATION AND SOIL NUTRIENT EXPLOITATION 847
current study a herd of 60 male sheep was used and grazing behav-
iour of a sexually mixed herd might be different.
If one seeks to derive a control strategy against this grassland weed
from the current investigation it would be temporal sheep grazing that
combines indirect and direct control strategies through the provision of
a dense sward and the continuous removal of aboveground plant parts.
There is already some evidence that simultaneous grazing by cows and
goats improved R. obtusifolius control better than single grazing by
either cows or goats (Sakanoue et al., 1995; see also Popay and Field,
1996) but there is definitely a need for more detailed research into the
control of this perennial grassland weed through grazing management.
It would also be interesting to explore the efficacy of different sheep
breeds in controlling R. obtusifolius in more detail.
Taken together, the current data suggest that sheep grazing should
be regarded as a control measure against R. obtusifolius in pastures
because it can directly affect the regrowth potential of this species and
indirectly control this species by the provision of a dense grassland
sward which can affect the abundance of this weed in pastures. Thus,
sheep grazing has the potential to be more widely included in pasture
management schemes where there is a need to avoid or reduce
herbicide use.
Acknowledgements
The author is very grateful to Conrad von Randow for providing the
East-Prussian Skudden and to Joachim Mross, Stefan Doll and
Martin Berg for taking care of them during the course of the experi-
ment. The author also gratefully acknowledges the help of Alexandra
Donati, Britta Staffel, Harriet Leese, Ute Schlee, Birgit Stöcker,
Janine Antosch and Dieter Zedow, for their help in the field and with
laboratory analyses.
References
Arnold, G.W., 1987. Influence of the biomass, botanical composition and sward height
of annual pastures on foraging behaviour by sheep. J. Appl. Ecol. 24: 759–772.
Cavers, P.B. and J.L. Harper, 1964. Biological flora of the British Isles. Rumex
obtusifolius L. and Rumex crispus L. J. Ecol. 52: 737–766.
Courtney, A.D., 1985. Impact and control of docks in grassland. In: Brockman J.S.
(ed), Weeds, Pests and Diseases of Grassland and Herbage Legumes. British Crop
Protection Council, Croydon, UK. pp. 120–127.
REGENERATION AND SOIL NUTRIENT EXPLOITATION 849
Launchbaugh, K.L., F.D. Provenza and J.A. Pfister, 2001. Herbivore response to anti-
quality factors in forages. J. Range Manage. 54: 431–440.
Nashiki, M., 1995. Competition of the weed, Rumex obtusifolius L., with pasture plants
for early control in new grassland. Bull. Tohoku National Agricult. Experiment
Station 90: 93–153.
Nashiki, M., R. Meguro and E. Fukuda, 1998. Effect of cutting on carbohydrate
content of Rumex obtusifolius L. J. Weed Sci. Technol. 43: 274–276.
Nemoto, M., S. Kobayashi, S. Kawashima and Y. Kaneki, 1983. Studies on the ecological
control of Rumex obtusifolius. I. The relation between emergence of R obtusifolius and
dominant forage species in permanent pastures. Weed Res. Japan 28: 198–204.
Niggli, U., J. Nösberger and J. Lehmann, 1993. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and
cutting frequency on the competitive ability and the regrowth capacity of Rumex
obtusifolius L. in several grass swards. Weed Res. 33: 131–137.
Novak, J., 1995. The influence of utilization and the changes of nitrogen content in
eutrophicated soil on the retreat of Rumex obtusifolius. Acta Fytotechn. 51: 73–80.
Panetta, F.D. and D.A. Wardle, 1992. Gap size and regeneration in a New Zealand
dairy pasture. Austral. J. Ecol. 17: 169–175.
Parr, T.W. and J.S. Brockman, 1985. The control of weed populations during grass
establishment by the manipulation of seed rates. Weeds, Pests and Diseases of
Grasslands and Herbage Legumes. pp. 20–28.
Pino, J., R.J. Haggar, F.X. Sans, R.M. Masalles, R.N.S. Hamilton and R.N. Sackville
Hamilton, 1995. Clonal growth and fragment regeneration of Rumex obtusifolius L.
Weed Res. 35: 141–148.
Pino, J., F.X. Sans, R.M. Masalles and J.M. Thomas, 1994. The effect of periodical
shoot removal on Rumex obtusifolius L. establishment in irrigated alfalfa (Medicago
sativa L.) crops. In: IFOAM (ed), Maitrise des adventices par voie non chimique.
Communications de la quatrieme conference internationale I.F.O.A.M., vol. 2.
IFOAM, Dijon, France. pp. 319–324.
Popay, I. and R. Field, 1996. Grazing animals as weed control agents. Weed Techn. 10:
217–231.
Roberts, R.A. and E.W. Hughes, 1939. Biological studies in the control of docks
(Rumex spp.). Welsh J. Agricult. 15: 218–237.
Sakanoue, S., N. Kitahara and H. Hayashi, 1995. Biological control of Rumex
obtusifolius L. by goat grazing. JARQ, Japan Agricult. Res. Quart. 29: 39–42.
Sambraus, H.-H., 2001. Atlas der Nutztierrassen. 250 Rassen in Wort und Bild, 6th edn.
Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.
Terren, S., 2002. De´termination de la biodiversite´ et de la qualite´ de biotope des prairies
permanentes, Diploma thesis. University of Bonn, Germany.
Voigtländer, G., V. Lang and W. Kühbauch, 1976. Zum Reservestoffwechsel des
Stumpfblättrigen Ampfers (Rumex obtusifolius L.) und des Wiesenknöterich
(Polygonum bistorta L.). Landwirtschaftl. Forsch. 29: 109–117.
Watt, T.A. and C.W.D. Gibson, 1988. The effect of sheep grazing on seedling
establishment and survival in grassland. Vegetatio 78: 91–98.
Zaller, J.G., 2004a. Competitive ability of Rumex obtusifolius against native grassland
species: above- and belowground allocation of biomass and nutrients. J. Plant Dis.
Prot. 19: 345–351.
Zaller, J.G., 2004b. Ecology and non-chemical control of Rumex crispus and
R. obtusifolius (Polygonaceae): a review. Weed Res. 44: 414–432.
Zar, J.H., 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA.