Sie sind auf Seite 1von 55

Development of

Energy Eciency
Indicators in Russia
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
NATHALIE TRUDEAU AND
ISABEL MURRAY
WORKI NG PAPER
2011
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
The International Energy Agency (IEA), an autonomous agency, was established in
November 1974. Its mandate is two-fold: to promote energy security amongst its member
countries through collective response to physical disruptions in oil supply and to advise member
countries on sound energy policy.
The IEA carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co-operation among 28 advanced
economies, each of which is obliged to hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days of its net imports.
The Agency aims to:
n Secure member countries access to reliable and ample supplies of all forms of energy; in particular,
through maintaining effective emergency response capabilities in case of oil supply disruptions.
n Promote sustainable energy policies that spur economic growth and environmental protection
in a global context particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions that contribute
to climate change.
n Improve transparency of international markets through collection and analysis of
energy data.
n Support global collaboration on energy technology to secure future energy supplies
and mitigate their environmental impact, including through improved energy
efciency and development and deployment of low-carbon technologies.
n Find solutions to global energy challenges through engagement
and dialogue with non-member countries, industry,
international organisations and other stakeholders. IEA member countries:
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Korea (Republic of)
Luxembourg
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
The European Commission
also participates in
the work of the IEA.
Please note that this publication
is subject to specifc restrictions
that limit its use and distribution.
The terms and conditions are available
online at www.iea.org/about/copyright.asp
OECD/IEA, 2011
International Energy Agency
9 rue de la Fdration
75739 Paris Cedex 15, France
www.iea.org
Development of
Energy Eciency
Indicators in Russia
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
NATHALIE TRUDEAU AND
ISABEL MURRAY
WORKI NG PAPER
2011
The views expressed in this working paper are those of
the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policy
of the International Energy Agency (IEA) Secretariat or
of its individual member countries. This paper is a work
in progress, designed to elicit comments and further debate;
thus, comments are welcome, directed to the authors at:
nathalie.trudeau@iea.org or isabel.murray@iea.org
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|3
Tableofcontents
Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................5
Executivesummary.........................................................................................................................7
ThedatasituationinRussiatodevelopindicators..................................................................8
Introduction:theuseofindicatorstounravelthecomplexityofenergyconsumption..............10
Industrysector..............................................................................................................................12
AvailabilityofindustrydatainRussiatodevelopindicators.................................................13
Keyindicatorsfortheindustrialsector.................................................................................15
Residentialsector..........................................................................................................................18
AvailabilityofresidentialdatainRussiatodevelopindicators.............................................19
Keyindicatorsfortheresidentialsector...............................................................................21
Servicesector................................................................................................................................25
AvailabilityofservicedatainRussiatodevelopindicators...................................................25
Keyindicatorsfortheservicesector.....................................................................................26
Transportsector............................................................................................................................28
Passengertransportsector....................................................................................................28
Freighttransportsector.........................................................................................................32
Conclusionsandnextsteps...........................................................................................................36
AnnexA.TheIEAindicatorapproach...........................................................................................37
ThebenefitsoftheIEAapproach..........................................................................................37
TheIEAindicatorpyramid.....................................................................................................38
AnnexB.TheIEAmethodologyforanalysingenergyconsumption.............................................46
Thedecompositionofchangesinenergyconsumption........................................................46
Sectoralcoverage..................................................................................................................49
AnnexC.References.....................................................................................................................51
AnnexD.Abbreviations,acronymsandunits...............................................................................52
Listoffigures
FigureA.1:TheIEAindicatorpyramid..........................................................................................38
FigureA.2:Industrysectorpyramid.............................................................................................39
FigureA.3:Residentialsectorpyramidbasedonfloorarea.........................................................41
FigureA.4:Residentialsectorpyramidbasedonhousehold.......................................................42
FigureA.5:Servicesectorpyramid...............................................................................................43
FigureA.6:Passengertransportsectorpyramid..........................................................................44
FigureA.7:Freighttransportsectorpyramid...............................................................................45
FigureB.1:BasicoverviewoffactorsinCO
2
decomposition........................................................49
FigureB.2:Disaggregationofsectors,subsectorsandendusesin
IEAenergyindicatorsapproach..............................................................................................50

DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|4
Listoftables
Table1:Industrydataneededtodevelopbasicenergyand
energyefficiencyindicators...................................................................................................14
Table2:Keyindicatorstounderstandtrendsinenergyand
energyefficiencyinindustry.................................................................................................16
Table3:Residentialdataneededtodevelopbasicenergyand
energyefficiencyindicators...................................................................................................20
Table4:Keyindicatorstounderstandtrendsinenergyand
energyefficiencyinresidential..............................................................................................22
Table5:Servicedataneededtodevelopbasicenergyand
energyefficiencyindicators...................................................................................................26
Table6:Keyindicatorstounderstandtrendsinenergyand
energyefficiencyinservices..................................................................................................27
Table7:Passengertransportdataneededtodevelopbasicenergyand
energyefficiencyindicators....................................................................................................30
Table8:Keyindicatorstounderstandtrendsinenergyandenergy
efficiencyinpassengertransport..........................................................................................31
Table9:Freighttransportdataneededtodevelopbasicenergyand
energyefficiencyindicators...................................................................................................33
Table10:Keyindicatorstounderstandtrendsinenergyand
energyefficiencyinfreighttransport....................................................................................35
TableB.1:Summaryofvariablesusedforthedecomposition.....................................................47
Listofboxes
Box1:TheIEAenergyefficiencyindicatorstemplate..................................................................11
Box2:Energyefficiencytrendsinmanufacturingsector.............................................................12
Box3:Impactofindustrialstructure............................................................................................13
Box4:Thebenefitsofenergyefficiencyindicatorsforcompanies..............................................14
Box5:Energyefficiencytrendsinresidentialsector....................................................................18
Box6:Determiningpriorityareafordevelopingendusedata....................................................19
Box7:Energyefficiencytrendsinservicesector..........................................................................25
Box8:Energyefficiencytrendsinpassengertransportsector....................................................28
Box9:Energyefficiencytrendsinfreighttransportsector..........................................................32

OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|5
Acknowledgements
This work was undertaken by the International Energy Agency (IEA) with funding from the
Foreign and Commonwealth Office of the United Kingdom Government under the Strategic
ProgrammeFund.
This paper was prepared by the IEA Directorate of Sustainable Energy Policy and Technology in
collaboration with the Directorate of Global Energy Dialogue. The lead authors are Nathalie
TrudeauandIsabelMurray.
SpecialthanksgotoJeanYvesGarnier,HeadofIEAEnergyStatisticsDivision,PeterTaylor,Headof
IEAEnergyTechnologyPolicyDivisionandAnnEggington,formerHeadofIEAEurope,MiddleEast
andAfricaDivision,fortheircontinuoussupportandencouragementthroughouttheproject.
Editorial and production assistance provided by Anne Mayne and Marilyn Smith added
significantlytotheoverallqualityofthereport.
Manyothercolleagueshaveprovidedhelpfulcontributions,particularlyFranoisCuenot,Davide
dAmbrosio,MichelFrancoeur,PhilippinedeTSerclaesandAnnaZyzniewski.
TheIEAandtheauthorswishtothanktheFederalStateStatisticsService(Rosstat)oftheRussian
Federation for their close cooperation throughout the project with special thanks to Alexander
Goncharov, Deputy Director, Department of Foreign Statistics and International Cooperation,
Rosstat. The IEA would also like to thank the Russian Energy Agency for their cooperation over
2010onenergyefficiencyindicators.
The IEA would also like to thank all the participants of the Round Table on Energy Efficiency
Indicators in Russia, held in Moscow on 20 September 2010, for their valuable insights on this
issue.TheIEAandtheauthorswelcometheirfeedbackonthisworkingpaperandlookforwardto
continuedcooperation.

OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|7
Executivesummary
Fordecades,countriesaroundtheworldhaveusedaggregateindicatorstoconstructabigpicture
ofpatternsofenergyuse.Oneofthemostcommonlyusedaggregateindicatorsisenergyintensity:
the measure of energy consumption per unit of gross domestic product (GDP). According to this
indicator,RussialedG8countries
1
inthereductionofenergyintensityoverthe1990s;Russiasenergy
intensityhavingimprovedby2.5%ayear.From2000to2007,Russianenergyintensityexperienced
anevenhigherrateofimprovementwithanaverageannualdecreaseofover5%.
However,theusefulnessofthisindicatorislimited andcanbemisleading;inactualfact,energy
intensity is driven by many factors that are not necessarily related to energy efficiency. So it is
perfectly possible to have improving energy efficiency, while still seeing rises in energy
consumption (the inverse is also true). For instance, given the increase in international
hydrocarbon prices during the 200007 period and the consequent growth in Russias GDP, it is
likely that the decline in energy intensity seen during this time frame was linked more to
economicgrowthratherthanimprovedenergyefficiency.
This speaks to the need for mechanisms that can deliver a better understanding of the factors
that affect energy intensity, not onlywithin a given country but on a sectorbysector basis that
adequately reflects that countrys economic landscape. Moreover, as each main sector
2
is
influenced by different underlying factors, different explanatory data will be needed depending
on the sector analysed. Much more detailed and disaggregated data than are currently
availableinstandardenergybalancesareneededforeachmainendusesectortoassesstherole
ofenergyefficiencyandthepotentialforfurtherenergysavings.
Overthepastyears,theInternationalEnergyAgency(IEA)hasbeendevelopingenergyefficiency
indicators for each enduse sector, with the specific aim of helping to disentangle the various
factors that drive and restrain energy use. Much of this work has been driven by the fact that
improved energy efficiency is a shared policy goal of many governments around the world. The
benefits of more efficient use of energy are well known and include reduced investments in
energy infrastructure, lower fossilfuel dependency, increased competitiveness and improved
consumer welfare. Efficiency gains can also deliver environmental benefits by reducing
greenhousegasemissionsandlocalairpollution.
In recent years, the IEA has worked closely with Russia to improve energy data collection in
general.Whilesomeprogresshasbeenmade,muchmoreworkisrequired: mostdatarequired
to understand past trends, assess the largest potential for energy savings and enhance energy
efficiencypoliciesarecurrentlynotavailable.
Despitethedatagapsidentified,analysisofsomesectorsoftheeconomyindicatesthatthereisa
large energy savings potential in Russia. In fact, Russia is sometimes referred to as the Saudi
Arabia of energy efficiency; its vast potential to reduce inefficient or wasteful energy
consumption can be considered a significant energy reserve. One IEA study estimated that
energy efficiency improvements in Russias district heating sector, alone, could save 30 billion
cubic metres per year (bcm/yr) to 50bcm/yr of natural gas (IEA, 2004). Optimisation of its
transmissionanddistributionsystemsfornaturalgas,coupledwithreductionsingasflaringbyits
oil and gas industry, could save up to a further 30 bcm/yr. In the industry sector, the energy
savingsfromtheapplicationofbestavailabletechnologiesisestimatedat750petajoules(PJ).
3

1
TheG8countriesincludeCanada,France,Germany,Italy,Japan,Russia,theUnitedKingdomandtheUnitedStates.
2
Themainenergyconsumingsectorstypicallyanalysedincludeindustry,residential,serviceandtransport.
3
It is important to note that this potential cannot be achieved in the short term. The rate of implementation of best available
technologies in practice depends on a number of factors, including capital stock turnover, relative energy costs, raw material
availability,ratesofreturnoninvestmentandregulations.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|8
Russia, recognising the benefits of more efficient use of energy, is taking measures to exploit this
potential.Thepresidenthassetthegoaltoreduceenergyintensityby40%between2007and2020.
Furthermore,since2008,Russiahastakenimportantstepstowardcreatingalegalandinstitutional
framework to enhance efficient energy use and supply. A law on energy efficiency, passed in the
Duma
4
inNovember2009,introducesseveralimportantmeasuressuchas:restrictionsonthesaleof
incandescent light bulbs; requirements for electrical products to be labelled according to their
energyefficiencyrating;provisionsonmandatorycommercialinventoriesofenergyresources;new
energyefficiencystandardsfornewbuildingsandinstallations;andreductionsinbudgetspending
onpurchasingenergyresources.Inaddition,energyintensivebusinesseswillberequiredtocarry
out energysaving research and to adhere to energysaving and energyefficiency programmes.
This new protocol will also encompass a transition to a longterm tariff regulation and the
establishmentofasharedinterministerialenergyefficiencyinformationandanalysissystem.
In the past few years, the IEA worked closely with Russias Federal State Statistics Service
(Rosstat) and the newly formed Russian Energy Agency to support the development of energy
efficiency indicators in Russia. This work, which has focused on the industrial, residential and
transportsectors,iscriticaltoaneffectiveimplementationandmonitoringofRussiasambitious
energy intensity and efficiency goals. Since 2008, the IEA has been working with Rosstat to
establishwhatdataalreadyexists,identifythedatagaps,andassessthedataquality.
ThekeyfindingsoftheIEAworkwithRussiaondevelopingenergyefficiencyindicatorsformthe
coreofthisreport.Thereportprovidesanoverallassessmentofrecenttrends,thecurrentdata
situation in Russia, a list of the basic data needed to develop indicators, and the usefulness and
limitation of some key indicators. It comprises five chapters covering the five main enduse
sectors:industry,residential,services,passengertransportandfreighttransport.
The report also includes two methodological annexes. Annex A describes the IEA indicator
approach, which uses the idea of a pyramid to portray the hierarchy of energy indicators (from
mostdetailedtoleastdetailed).AnnexBincludestheIEAenergymethodologytoanalysetrendsin
energyconsumption.
ThedatasituationinRussiatodevelopindicators
Industrysector
The IEA has found that for industry, the data available from Rosstat national energy surveys and
Russian National Accounts
5
are at a detailed enough level of disaggregation to calculate energy
indicators based on physical units on production and provide an initial assessment of the effect of
energy efficiency on industry energy consumption. However, several major issues still need to be
overcometodevelopenergyefficiencyindicators.Forinstance,RosstatusescurrentRussianroubles
initsvalueaddedcalculations,butinordertoestablishanoverallindicatorfortheindustrysector,
valueaddedin constantcurrencyisrequired.
6
The IEA iscurrentlyworkingwith Rosstattoaddress
this data issue. Questions also exist regarding breaks in Rosstat time series for some data points.
More difficult issues remain in relation to defining the coverage of energy consumption data (the
boundariesfortheindustry).Theboundariesissueswilltakemuchlongertoresolveandwilldemand

4
Russiasparliament.
5
TheNationalAccountsisaconsistentandintegratedsetofmacroeconomicaccounts,balancesheetsandtablesbasedonaseton
internationally agreed concepts, definitions, classifications and accounting rules. It includes data such as GDP, investment, private
consumptionandlevelofgovernmentdebt.
6
Valueaddedisthedifferencebetweenoutputandintermediateconsumptionforanygivensector/industrythatisthedifference
betweenthevalueofgoodsandservicesproducedandthecostofrawmaterialsandotherinputsusedinproduction.
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|9
closecollaborationwithRosstatexpertsandstatisticians.Moredetailedanalysiswillalsobeneeded
tobetterunderstandRosstatsindustryenergyconsumptiondata.
Residentialsector
Some of the necessary data to establish aggregate energy indicators for the residential sector are
available for Russia from national annual surveys undertaken by Rosstat. These data include floor
area,numberofhouseholdsandsourceofspaceheating.NewquestionsaddedtoRosstatsNational
Household Income Survey 2010 will start to provide data required to build energy efficiency
indicators.Thesurveywillcollectinformationonthestock,ageandenergyefficiencyrankingoflarge
householdappliances,aswellasonthetypeoflightbulbsused.Thenationalsurveywillprovidedata
for2010andbeyondforthesenewdatapoints,criticalforabetterunderstandingoftrendsinenergy
consumption of appliances. This national survey will also continue to collect data on the size of
dwellingandheatedfloorarea,yearofconstructionandtypeofheatingequipment.
Whiletheexpansionofthesurveyisapositivestepindevelopinganenduseenergydatabaseand
assessing trends in residential energy and energy efficiency, additional data collection is required
forotherendusessuchasspaceheatingandcooling,waterheatingandsmallappliances.
Servicesector
Servicesisclearlythemostdifficultsectorinwhichtocollectdata.Atpresent,thereisaseriouslack
of detailed data in Russia, making it difficult to analyse trends in service energy consumption.
Russiaisnotuniqueinthisregard;mostIEAmembercountrieslackdetailedendusedataforthe
sector. Available data in IEA member countries show that the potential for energy savings in the
servicesectorvarieswidelyfordifferentenduses.Assuch,indepthanalysisattheenduselevel
is needed to develop indicators that can help to define the most important potential for energy
efficiencyimprovementsandsupportthedevelopmentofrelevantpolicies.
Transportsector
Much more work is needed in Russia to understand the structure and trends of energy
consumptioninthetransportsector.Analysisoftrendsinenergyandenergyefficiencyrequirea
separate analysis for passenger and freight transport, as each is influenced by different
underlying factors. In Russia, the necessary disaggregated data are not available for energy
consumption,andactivitydataareonlyavailableforsometransportmodes.
ManydatasourcesexistsbeyondofficialRosstattransportsectordata,whichcangoalongwayto
completing the picture of structure and trends of energy consumption especially in terms of
individual automotive transport, one of the fastestgrowing sectors in IEA member countries and
likely in Russia, too. Car registration and the annual car inspection process could provide an
effectivewaytoenhancethedataondrivingtrendsandautomotivestock.Giventhesesystemsare
alreadyinplacetogatherthisimportantinputdata,allthatmaybeneededisacoordinatingbody
or agency to set up a data collection system. Data estimates and models are also available from
various research institutes. The IEA had very useful discussions and preliminary exchange of
informationwiththeScientificandResearchInstituteofMotorTransport(NIIAT)inMoscow.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|10
Introduction:theuseofindicatorstounravelthe
complexityofenergyconsumption
Governments are uniquely positioned to establish, through policy implementation, the
frameworks within which energy is both produced and consumed across many socioeconomic
levels. As governments around the world tackle the complex and intertwined challenges of
improvingenergysecurityandreducinggreenhousegas(GHG)emissionsassociatedwithenergy
production and consumption while also supporting economic development objectives two
thingsareincreasinglyclear:
Ensuring a better use of the worlds energy resources will require policies that encompass a
widerangeofoptions.Analysisshowsthatimprovingenergyefficiencyisoftenthemostcost
effective,provenandreadilyavailablemeansofachievingthisgoal.
Good quality, timely, comparable and detailed data that go well beyond those currently
included in statistical energy balances, are necessary to establish and maintain sound policy.
These data must reflect the distinct characteristics of economic activity and resources
availableineachcountry.
For the overall economy, aggregate indicators such as total primary energy supply (TPES) and
totalfinalenergyconsumption(TFC)perGDPisoftenusedtoconstructabigpictureofcurrent
patterns of energy use. Aggregate energy indicators have the advantage that they are often
readilyandwidelyavailable.Thus,theycanrevealhighleveldevelopmentsinenergyuseandcan
be constructed to facilitate basic crosscountry comparisons. However, they could often be
misleading and consequently it would be incorrect, to rank energy efficiency performance
accordingtoacountrysTPESorTFCperGDP.
Inordertodevelopestimatesofoverallenergyefficiency,detaileddataarerequiredforthemain
enduse sectors (industry, residential, services and transport). As each sector is influenced by
different underlying factors, different explanatory data will be needed depending on the sector
analysed.Recentefforts byseveralcountries tocollectmoredetailedendusedata have helped
indevelopingindicatorsthatcanbeusedtounderstandpasttrends,assesspotentialforenergy
savingsandenhanceenergyefficiencypolicies.
Understandpasttrends:Energybalancedataforagroupof11IEAmembercountries
7
showthat
energy consumption increased by 22% from 1973 to 2006. More importantly, detailed enduse
dataavailableforthese11countriesdemonstratethatwithoutimprovementinenergyefficiency
overthesameperiod,energyconsumptionwouldhavebeen63%higherin2006.
Assess potential for energy savings: Detailed enduse data and indicators are equally essential
for assessing the further contribution of energy efficiency. IEA estimates show that large
potentialsremainacrossallsectorsoftheeconomy.
Enhance energy efficiency policies: This capacity to track trends and identify potential savings
makes detailed enduse data and energy efficiency indicators key to launching and monitoring
moreeffectiveenergyefficiencypolicy.
An analysis of the impacts to date of energy efficiency policies implemented by IEA member
countries reveals that effective policies do make a difference. In each of the main energy
consumingsectors,thereisevidenceofimprovedefficiency,mostofwhichalsoresultsinreduced

7
Australia,Denmark,Finland,France,Germany,Italy,Japan,Norway,Sweden,theUnitedKingdomandtheUnitedStates.
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|11
carbon dioxide (CO
2
) emissions. In some cases, however, unexpected changes in consumption
patternswithinagivensectororsubsectorreducetheoverallimpactofefficiencygains.
Box1.TheIEAenergyefficiencyindicatorstemplate
Whileitisclearenergyefficiencypolicieswork,thefactisthatcurrentlyavailableenergydataare
a poor foundation for developing an indepth understanding of how or why or indeed, for
analysing which measures are most effective and warrant broader implementation. This fact
underlines the reality that existing data and information are too sparse to precisely analyse the
impactofspecificmeasures.
Clearly, more data and different kind of data are needed to support the strategic
development,implementationandevaluationofenergyefficiencypolicies.
This paper examines various energy and energy efficiency indicators their usefulness and
limitationsanddescribes:
Thesetofdataneededtocalculatekeyenergyandenergyefficiencyindicators;
AvailabledatainIEAmembercountriesandinRussiafromthissetofdata;and
What energy and energy efficiency indicators can be derived with this set of data, and what
thoseindicatorsreveal.
To facilitate the reporting of comparable data across all IEA member countries, the IEA has worked
with the ODYSSEE Network (European Union) and the AsiaPacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) to
develop a standard energy efficiency indicators template. The template (which is similar to and
buildsonthesuccessoftheIEAannualenergystatisticsquestionnairesoffuels)establishesuniform
system boundaries, data definitions and methodologies specific to energy consumption and other
datarelatedtoenergyefficiency.
Early use of this template by member countries has already allowed the IEA Secretariat to define a
series of disaggregate energy indicators that aim tocapture key data relevant to each major sector.
Generally, these disaggregate indicators probe deeper than energy balances by focusing on activity
levels,structuraleffects,energyefficiencytrendsandpotentialforfutureenergysavings.
Suchindicatorsprovideamuchmoreeffectivemeansoftrackingtheevolutionofenergyusewithina
countryandconductingcomparativeanalyses.Theycanhelptoidentifyemergingtrendsinenduse
sectorsincludingthefactorsbehindincreasingenergyconsumptionandthosethatrestrainit.They
also help to uncover areas that hold the greatest potential for improving energy efficiency and the
overallscopeforfurtherenergysavings.Ultimately,indicatorscanthusbeusedtoshapeprioritiesfor
futureactionsandtomonitorprogress.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|12
Industrysector
The industry sector covers the manufacturing sector (the manufacture of finished goods and
products), mining and quarrying of raw materials and construction. Power generation, refineries
andthedistributionofelectricity,gasandwaterareexcludedfromtheindustrysector.
Russias industrial sector is vast, including major enterprises in mining, energy, automotive,
defence,construction,communication,consumerdurables,constructionequipmentandtextiles.
But Russias legacy of its Soviet past is the dominance of heavy industry such as iron and steel,
petrochemicalsandaluminiumallenergyresourceintensive.Afterhavingbeensetbackbythe
global economic crisis of 2008, Russian industrial production grew an estimated 11% in 2009.
Industrial output in Russia rose by 7.8% in January 2010, a sign that economic recovery was
strengthening in Russia. While the production of consumer goods remained flat or increased
marginally,productionofcarsandtrainswitnessedseveresetbackscomparedto200809levels.
Because of its Soviet legacy, Russian industry needs to restructure, streamline costs and ensure
that its products meet demand in the most economic and environmentally sound way. The
handful of energy efficiency success stories in Russias industrial sector illustrates how
competitiveforcesspurthisonrelativetoregulatemonopolisticmarkets.Russianindustryisslow
in realising its energy efficiency potential primarily due to a lack of awareness among managers
and insufficient supply of longterm capital to finance energy efficient modernisation (World
Bank, 2008). Russia is one of the country with the largest energy savings potential for the five
most energy intensive industry (iron and steel, cement, chemicals and petrochemicals,
aluminiumandpulpandpaper)(IEA,2008;IEA,2009;IEA2010).Inaddition,companiesinseveral
sectorslacktheincentive tosaveenergybecause productpricesaregrowingfasterthanenergy
tariffs. In this regard, the continuation of electricity and gas sector reforms are critical to
achievingthissectorsenergyefficiencypotential.
Box2.Energyefficiencytrendsinmanufacturingsector

8
Fuelprocessingindustriesandfuelsusedasfeedstockarenotincludedintheanalysis.
9
IEA 21 includes Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Korea, the
Netherlands,NewZealand,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,UnitedKingdomandtheUnitedStates.
Globally, energy consumption in the manufacturing sector increased by 29% between 1990 and
2008.
8
In 2008, it accounted for 29% of TFC and 37% of enduse sectors CO
2
emissions. In Russia,
manufacturing energyconsumption decreased by about29%between1993and 2008, while energy
consumptioninthefivemostenergyintensiveindustriesdecreasedonlyby2%.
An analysis of the manufacturing sector for 21 IEA member countries
9
indicates that buoyant
economicgrowthandhighenergypriceshaveplayedaroleinimprovingenergyefficiency.Inorder
tosatisfyincreaseddemandforcommodities,countriesaddednew,moreefficientcapacity,thereby
reducing the share of smaller, less efficient production units. Energy consumption in those 21 IEA
member countries would have been 29% higher in 2006 than it was without the energy efficiency
improvementsinthesectorsince1990.
DespitetheimpressiverecentefficiencygainsinIEAmembercountries,themanufacturingsectorstill
shows considerable potential for further energy savings. The estimated global savings for the five
most energyintensive manufacturing sectors (pulp and paper, chemicals and petrochemicals, iron
andsteel,aluminium,andcement)are15PJperyearenoughtomeettheannualenergyneedsof
industry,transportandhouseholdsinRussia.
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|13
AvailabilityofindustrydatainRussiatodevelopindicators
To effectively assess the developments in energy efficiency trends, the impact of energy
efficiency measures and the further potential for energy savings in the industry sector, the
followingdataarerequired:
Detailedenergyconsumptiondatabyindustry;
Valueaddeddatainconstantcurrency;and
Physicalproductionofkeycommodities,wherepossible.
While energy consumption data are usually available from the energy balances of countries
(althoughonlyatthetwodigitInternationalStandardIndustrialClassification[ISIC]level),value
added data are not always available (or are available but not for the same level of detail as the
data for energy consumption). Value added in constant currency by industry allows the
development of indicators for heterogeneous industry, and are required to aggregate the
detailedindicatorstoassessenergyefficiencyforthetotalindustrysector.
Box3.Impactofindustrialstructure
In Russia, Rosstat has been collecting for numerous years industryrelated data. Rosstats 11 TER
Form(Rosstatenergyconsumptionquestionnaireforindustry)providesenergyconsumptionatthe
fourdigit ISIC level as well as the production in physical units for the same industrial breakdown.
These data are available on an annual basis at both regional and national levels. The information
fromthe11TERFormcanbeusedtodevelopindustryspecificindicators,andprovideaproxyfor
theevolutionofenergyefficiency.Thelongtimeseriesavailableallowsanalysisoftheevolutionof
energyefficiencyata detailedlevelofsectoraldisaggregation.However,these multipleindicators
do not provide an industrywide assessment of how energy efficiency in each industry sector
influencedthetrendsinenergyconsumptionfortheoverallindustry.
Physical units of production are the preferred activity variable to build detailed industry
indicators.However,foranoverallenergyefficiencyindicatorfortheindustrysectorasawhole,
aggregation of the various industryspecific indicators is required. Given that physical units of
production cannot be added together (one tonne of steel cannot be added to one tonne of
clinker),avalueaddedapproachisusedfromeachsubsectortoprovideacommonbasis.
In doing so, it is essential to use value added in constant currency to avoid including a bias
inducedbyfluctuationsonthemonetarymarket.Valueadded,incurrentcurrency,areavailable
fromRosstatsNationalAccountsatthefourdigitISIClevel.However,thedeflatortoconvertthe
currentvaluestoconstantonesisonlyavailableforthemining,manufacturingandconstruction
sectors.Deflatorsforthedifferentmanufacturingsectorsarenotavailable.
TheenergyconsumptiondatafromRosstatsForm11TERandthevalueaddedfromtheNational
Accounts, if develop in constant roubles, would allow the development of an overall energy
Thevalueaddeddatabyindustryarealsorequiredtoanalysetheimpactofstructuralchangesinthe
sector. This information is essential when trying to understand trends in energy consumption, or
whenperformingcountrycomparisons.
Analysis shows that IEA member countries with high shares of energyintensive industries (such as
cement and iron and steel) usually rank among the most intensive countries. However, if those
countrieshadthesamestructureastheaverageIEAcountries,theaggregatemanufacturingintensity
wouldbereducedconsiderably;byover20%inmanycases.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|14
efficiency indicators for industry. However, the quality and comparability of the data, and the
boundariesofeachindustry,stillneedtobevalidated.
Fortheindustrysector,theIEAenergyefficiencyindicatorstemplaterequiresthreeelements:energy
consumptiondata(atthetwodigitISIClevelandbyenergysources);valueaddedinconstantcurrency
(twodigitISIClevel);andphysicalunitsofproductionforheterogeneousindustry.Theserepresentthe
minimumlevelofinformationrequiredtodevelopmeaningfulenergyandenergyefficiencyindicators.
Box4.Thebenefitsofenergyefficiencyindicatorsforcompanies
Industry data IEA member countries are required to report to the IEA through the energy efficiency
indicatorstemplate,
10
aswellasthenumberofIEAmembercountriesthatcurrentlyreportsuchdatato
theIEA,arepresentedinTable1.ThetablealsoshowswhichdataarecurrentlyavailablefromRussia.
Table1:Industrydataneededtodevelopbasicenergyandenergyefficiencyindicators
Dataneededtodevelop
indicators
NumberofIEAmember
countriesreportingthedata
DataavailablefromRussia

Energy
use
Value
added
Commodity
production
Energyuse
Value
added
Commodity
production
Agriculture,hunting,fishingand
forestry
28 25 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Miningandquarrying 28 24 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Manufactureofcoke,refined
petroleumproductsandnuclear
fuel
28 18 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Manufacturing 28 26 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Foodproducts,beveragesand
tobaccoproducts
28 24 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Textiles,wearingapparel,fur
andleather
26 24 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Woodandofproductsofwood
andcork,exceptfurniture
24 22 n.a. Yes No n.a.

10
Foreachindustrysector,energyusedataarealsorequiredbyenergysource.
Experience in IEA member countries suggests that industry itself may be very interested in relevant
energy efficiency indicators. Companies can use such indicators to draw lessons on how to become
more energy efficient, and can benchmark themselves against other companies or chart their own
progress over time. Ultimately, indicators can be used to increase competitiveness. With increasing
tariffs for Russian domestic electricity and natural gas, more costreflective pricing will encourage
more energy efficient behaviour which, in turn, raises net revenues. Further stimulus for energy
efficiencythroughnationalprogrammescouldbringaddedincentivestoindustry:ifshareholdersview
improvedefficiencyassupportingnationalgoals,thecompanymayseeitssharepriceincrease.
Collecting data relating to energy use by small and mediumsized enterprises (SMEs) is not yet a
practiceinRussiaastheunderlyinglegislationformandatoryreportingdoesnotexist.IEAexperience
isthatdatafromSMEsareanimportantcomponentoftheenergyscene.InsomeIEAcountries,SMEs
report relevant data on a voluntary basis (in other countries, reporting is mandatory). The IEA also
finds that is it often more difficult to collect data from large enterprises: if there are one or two
companiesinthesector,theenterprisesmaybeaversetoreportingduetoconfidentialityissues.
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|15
Dataneededtodevelop
indicators
NumberofIEAmember
countriesreportingthedata
DataavailablefromRussia

Energy
use
Value
added
Commodity
production
Energyuse
Value
added
Commodity
production
Paperandpaperproducts 27 17 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Pulp 0 0 28 Yes No Yes
Paper 0 0 28 Yes No Yes
Publishing,printingand
reproductionofrecordedmedia
8 18 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Chemicalsandchemical
products
28 24 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Rubberandplasticsproducts 14 24 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Nonmetallicmineralproducts 28 25 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Cement 10 0 28 Yes No Yes
Clinker 0 0 0 Yes No Yes
Basicmetals 28 23 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Castingofironandsteel 28 0 28 Yes No Yes
Castingofpreciousandnon
ferrousmetals
0 0 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Aluminium 0 0 0 Yes No No?
Motorvehiclesandother
transportationequipment
23 23 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Othermanufacturing 28 21 n.a. Yes No n.a.
Notes:n.a.=notapplicableasthesectorasdefinedinthetableistooheterogeneoustohaveasinglemeasureofphysicalproduction.
IEAcountriescoverageindicatesthenumberofIEAmembercountriesforwhichdataarecurrentlyavailablefrom1990to2006inthe
energyindicatorsdatabase.AstheIEAhasnotyetreceivedvalueaddeddatainconstantcurrency,thevalueaddeddataareindicated
as not being available from Russia. Coverage for Russia is based on IEA knowledge of the data situation in Russia for 2000 onward;
thesehavebeenvalidatedbyRosstat.
Keyindicatorsfortheindustrialsector
InformationcollectedthroughtheIEAenergyefficiencyindicatorstemplateisusedtodevelopenergy
andenergyefficiencyindicatorsthatexplainthechangesinenergyconsumptionoveraperiodoftime.
Keyenergyandenergyefficiencyindicatorsthatcanbedevelopedwiththedatacollectedthroughthe
template,aswellasthepurposeandlimitationofthoseindicators,arepresentedinTable2.
Moredetailedindicatorscanbebuiltbycollectinginformationattheprocesslevelforeachsub
industryandfacilitycharacteristics.However,suchdataareavailableonlyforveryfewcountries
andforalimitednumberofsubindustries.
Itisalsopossibletocoupletheinformationonenergyconsumptionwithdataonenergypricesin
manufacturing, energy expenditures and capacity production to analyse the impact of these
factorsonthetrendsinenergyconsumption.
In some manufacturing sectors, portion of the energy consumption is influenced by weather
conditions.Theinfluenceonenergyconsumptionisdifferentfromindustrytoindustry.Given
the very limited information available on the impact of weather in industry, and the lack of
internationally recognised methodology to perform such an adjustment in the industry, the
IEA methodology does not take into account weather conditions in analysing the
manufacturingsector.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|16
Table2:Keyindicatorstounderstandtrendsinenergyandenergyefficiencyinindustry

Indicator Datarequired Purpose Limitation


E
N
E
R
G
Y

A
N
D

A
C
T
I
V
I
T
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
O
R
S

Totalindustryenergy
consumptionby
energysource
Totalindustryenergy
consumptionby
energysource.
Insightsontheroleofthefinalenergy
mixontotalfinalenergyconsumption.
InsightsonthetrendsinCO
2

emissions.
Observedenergytrendsnotnecessarilyaresultofimproved
(orworsening)energyefficiency.
Oneelement,amongstmanyothers,influencingtrendsin
energyconsumption.
Canbeattributedtochangesinrelativefuelprices,shiftsin
industrystructureandprocessesandimplementationof
environmentallegislationthatfavourstheuseofcleanerfuels.
Energyconsumption
byindustrysectors
andbyenergysource
Energyconsumption
byindustrysectors
andbyenergy
source.
Explaintheroleenergymixplayedon
thetrendinenergyconsumptionin
eachindustry.
InsightsonthetrendsinCO
2

emissions.
Notinfluencedbyindustrystructure
whendevelopedatavery
disaggregatedlevel.
Observedenergytrendsnotnecessarilyaresultofimproved
(orworsening)energyefficiency.
Influencedbychangesinrelativefuelprices,shiftsin
industryprocessesandimplementationofenvironmental
legislation.
Influencedbyindustrystructureifdevelopatanaggregate
level(e.g.twodigitsISIC).
Compositionof
industryvalueadded
(inconstantcurrency)
Valueaddedin
constantcurrencyby
industrysectoratthe
twodigitISIClevel
(ormoredetail).
Provideinformationontherelative
importanceofeachsector.
Insightsoftheimpactofthestructure
oftheindustryonenergy
consumption.
Qualitativeinformationhelpingto
explaintrendsinenergyconsumption.
Valueaddedisinfluencedbyarangeofpricingeffects
unrelatedtochangesinthelevelofphysicalproduction.
Compositionofindustryvalueadded,attwodigitISIClevel,
maymasksomeimportantstructuralshiftwithinan
industrysector.
Doesnotprovidethelinkbetweenvalueaddedandenergy
requiredtoquantifytheimpactofthestructuralchange.
Totalindustryenergy
consumptionbyunit
ofvalueadded
Totalindustryenergy
use.
Totalindustryvalue
added(inconstant
currency).
Reflectsthetrendsinoverallenergy
userelativetovalueadded.
Indicatesthegeneralrelationshipof
energyusetoeconomicdevelopment.
Influencedbyfactorssuchasgeography,climateand
structureoftheeconomy.
Changesovertimeareinfluencedbyfactorsnotnecessarily
relatedtoenergyefficiency.
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|17 Page|17

Indicator Datarequired Purpose Limitation


E
N
E
R
G
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
O
R
S

Industrysectors
energyconsumption
byunitofvalueadded
Energyconsumption
byindustrysector.
Correspondingvalue
added(inconstant
currency).
Indicatethegeneralrelationshipof
energyusetoeconomicdevelopment.
Mayhidesomeimportantstructuralshiftwithinanindustry
(butthisimpactwillbesomewhatoffsetbyusingmore
detailedenergyandvalueaddeddata).
Valueaddedareinfluencedbyarangeofpricingeffectsthat
areunrelatedtochangesintheunderlyingphysical
production.

E
N
E
R
G
Y

E
F
F
I
C
I
E
N
C
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
O
R
S

Industrysector energy
usebyunitofphysical
production
Energyconsumption
byindustrysector.
Corresponding
physicalunitof
production.
Oftencalledthespecificorunit
energyconsumption.
Indicatetherelationshipofenergyuse
tophysicalproduction.
Atthedisaggregatedlevel,cangivea
bettermeasureofthetechnical
efficiencyofaparticularproduction
process.
Itisnotpossibletocompareindicatorsdefinedindiffering
units.
Cannotprovideanaggregatepictureofenergyefficiencyfor
thewholeofindustry.
Decompositionof
changesinindustry
energyconsumption
Energyconsumption
byindustrysector
andenergysource.
Corresponding
physicalunitof
production(if
available).
Correspondingvalue
added(inconstant
currency).
Quantificationofthefactors
underlyingthechangesinenergy
consumptionoveradefinedperiodof
time.
Changesinenergyconsumptionare
decomposedbetweenindustry
structureeffect,energymixeffect,
andspecificintensityeffect(aproxyof
energyefficiency).
Thisisthebestindicatorfortotal
industrythatcanbedevelopedwith
thedatarequiredintheIEAenergy
efficiencyindicatorstemplate.
Thisproxyforenergyefficiencystillincludeseffectsthatare
notrelatedtotechnicalefficiency(suchastheimpactof
climaticconditionsandthechangeintheprocessesused
withinafacility).

DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|18
Residentialsector
Theresidentialsectorincludesthoseactivitiesrelatedtoprivatedwellings.Itcoversallenergy
using activities in apartments and houses, including space and water heating, cooling, lighting
and the use of appliances. It does not include personal transport, which is covered in the
transportsector.
Between 1993 and 2004, residential energy consumption in Russia was greater than for the
industry sector, as is typical for lowerincome countries in harshclimates. However, in 2005 the
commercialenergyconsumptiondataappeartohavebeenreadjustedupward,andresultedina
dramaticreductioninenergyconsumptionintheresidentialsector.Asaresult,in2005,Russian
TFCintheindustrialsector(5169PJ)surpassedthatoftheresidentialsector(4628PJ).Following
this reduction, according to IEA data based on annual submissions from Rosstat, residential
consumptionhasremainedrelativelyflatoverthe2005to2008period.
On a percapita basis, residential energy consumption roughly equals that in Canada, even
though Canada has three times Russias per capita floor space and electric appliances are larger
and more widespread. Thus, Russian residential energy consumption is at least twotothree
times more energy intensive than Canadas. The reasons are known: lack of consumer control
over heat regulation, low share of private ownership of apartments (landlords usually having
littleinterestininvestinginenergyefficiencyimprovements)andpricesubsidies.Largepotential
for energy savings exists in the residential sector. A study from the IEA estimated that energy
efficiencyimprovementsinRussiasdistrictheatingsectorcouldsave30bcm/yrto50bcm/yrof
naturalgas(IEA,2004).
The most significant barriers to energy efficiency in residential housing relate to building
standards, public behaviour and difficulties in organising and financing energy efficiency
improvementsincommonareas(WorldBank2008).
Box5.Energyefficiencytrendsinresidentialsector

11
IEA 19 includes Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, New
Zealand,Norway,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,theUnitedKingdom,theUnitedStates.
Globally,residentialenergyconsumptionincreasedby20%between1990and2006;itaccountedfor
28% of TFC in 2006 and 20% of enduse sectors CO
2
emissions. In Russia, residential energy
consumptiondecreasedby32%between1993and2006,andaccountedfor26%ofTFCin2006.
Detailedendusedatafortheresidentialsectorareavailablefor19IEAmembercountries,
11
allowing
a deeper analysis of the factors influencing residential trends in energy consumption. The analysis
indicates that the low growth in energy requirements for space heating per capita reflects an
impressive19%improvementinenergyefficiency.Infact,efficiencyimprovementsoffsetmostofthe
increaseinenergyconsumptionarisingfromtrendstowardlargerdwellingsizesandfeweroccupants
perdwelling.
The analysis also reveals a significant shift in appliances energy consumption. The share of large
appliances (e.g., refrigerators, freezers, dishwashers and clothes washers) in total appliance energy
consumptiondroppedfrom47%in1990toonly28%in2006.Increasingownershipofawiderangeof
small appliances (e.g.personal computers and mobile phones) was thekey factordriving the rise in
residentialelectricityconsumptionwhichisupby41%.
Overall, residential energy consumption in these 19 IEA member countries increased by 15% since
1990;almosthalfofthisincreasewasduetothegrowthinenergyconsumptionofappliances.
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|19
AvailabilityofresidentialdatainRussiatodevelopindicators
Total residential energy consumption, by energy source, is available from energy balances. As
each enduse is influenced by different factors, the analysis of energy efficiency trends in the
residential sector requires, at a minimum, detailed information at the enduse level, and
associated activity data. Furthermore, as space heating is greatly influenced by climatic
conditions, notably in countries with cold climates such as Russia, an adjustment is required to
accountfortheyearlyvariationinweatherconditions.
Fordevelopingpolicyrelevantindicatorsintheresidentialsector,thefollowingdataarerequired:
energyconsumptionbymajorendusesandbyenergysources;
mainactivityvariablesforthesector,includingnumberofhouseholdsandresidentialfloorarea;
information on the stock and efficiency not only of large appliances, but also of small
appliancesgiventheirgrowingimportance;and
informationonheatingandcoolingdegreedaystoadjustforweatherconditions.
SomeactivitydataareavailableforRussiafromRosstatsNationalHouseholdsIncomeSurveyon
anannualbasisforseveraldecades.Theseincludenumberofhousesandfloorareabydwelling
type and year of construction, heated floor area and type of heating system. The survey also
collects information on the access of households to the electricity and gas grid, and if dwellings
areconnectedtothedistrictheatingsystemorhaveindividualheatingdevices(andwhichenergy
sourceisused).
The IEA is encouraged by the new questions Rosstat included in its annual Household Budget
Survey. Starting in 2011, the survey will include questions on: additional heat sources used by
households;meteringdevices;numberandtypeoflightbulbs;numberofappliancesandyearof
acquisition;efficiencyranking;andclassoflargeappliances.Thesurvey,whichwillbeconducted
in2011,willprovidedatafor2010andbeyondforthesenewdatapoints.
Despitethesepositivedevelopments,theminimalsetofdatarequiredtodevelopenergyefficiency
indicatorsisnotavailableforRussia.Moreinformation,attheenduselevel,isnecessary.
Box6.Determiningpriorityareafordevelopingendusedata
Data that IEA member countries are required to report to the IEA through the energy efficiency
indicators template, as well as the number of countries that are currently able to provide the
dataarepresentedinTable3.ItalsopresentswhichdataarecurrentlyavailablefromRussia.

Even in IEA member countries, developing the data for each enduse is a challenge and can be
resource intensive (both in term of human and financial resources). The development of basic
indicatorscanhelptoidentifywhichenduseshouldbeapriorityforenergyefficiencyinitiativesand
policiesintheresidentialsectorandwheretostartintermsofdatacollectionstrategy.Oncepriority
areas are determined, efforts should first concentrate on these enduses. For example, if space
heatingisapriorityarea,thensupplementaryinformation(suchastypeofheatingdevice,insulation
of houses, age of capital stock and efficiency rating of heating equipment) could be collected to
developindepthindicators,allowingthedevelopmentoftargetedactions.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|20
Table3:Residentialdataneededtodevelopbasicenergyandenergyefficiencyindicators
Dataneededtodevelopindicators
NumberofIEAmember
countriesreportingthedata
Dataavailable
fromRussia
Energyconsumptionby:

Energysource 28 Yes
Enduse(andenergysource) 20 No
Spaceheating 25 No
Spacecooling 5 No
Waterheating 24 No
Cooking 23 No
Lighting 21 No
Appliances 24 No
Refrigerators 2 No
Freezers 12 No
Refrigerator/freezercombinations 13 No
Dishwashers 13 No
Clotheswashers 14 No
Clothesdryers 4 No
Television/homeentertainment 13 No
Personalcomputers/informationand
communicationtechnology
5 No
Otherappliances 24 No
Totaldwellings 27 Yes
Totaloccupieddwellings 27 Yes
Totaldwellingarea 24 Yes
Stockofappliances 14 Yes
Refrigerators 1 Yes
Freezers 19 Yes
Refrigerator/freezercombinations 17 Yes
Dishwashers 15 Yes
Clotheswashers 17 Yes
Clothesdryers 5 Yes
Television/homeentertainment 13 Yes
PC/informationandcommunicationtechnology 4 Yes
Average unit energy consumption of large
appliancesstock
13 No
Annualheatingdegreedays 27 No
Annualcoolingdegreedays 6 No
Note:IEAcountriescoverageindicatesthenumberofIEAmembercountriesforwhichdataarecurrentlyavailablefrom1990to2006
in the energy indicators database. Coverage for Russia is based on IEA knowledge of the data situation in Russia; which has been
validatedbytheRussianFederation.
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|21
Keyindicatorsfortheresidentialsector
ThedatacollectedthroughtheIEAenergyefficiencyindicatorstemplateprovideabasistobetter
understandenergyconsumptiontrendsintheresidentialsector,identifymajortrendsbyenduse
and help identify areas for further investigation. Key indicators that can be developed with the
setofdatacollectedthroughtheIEAenergyefficiencyindicatortemplateaswellasthepurpose
andlimitationofthoseenergyandenergyefficiencyindicatorsarepresentedinTable4.Forthe
buildingssector(residentialandservices),variationinweatherconditionsmayhaveanimportant
impactontrendsandlevelofenergyconsumption.Iftheindicatorsaredevelopedwithouttaking
the climatic conditions into consideration, the trends observed in aggregate indicators may be
misleading.
More indicators can be developed by coupling the information on energy use with other data
such as dwelling type, personal consumption expenditures, dwellings characteristics, energy
expendituresorresidentialenergyprices.

DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|22
Table4:Keyindicatorstounderstandtrendsinenergyandenergyefficiencyinresidential

Indicator Datarequired Purpose Limitation


E
N
E
R
G
Y

A
N
D

A
C
T
I
V
I
T
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
O
R
S

Residentialenergyconsumptionby
energysource
Energy
consumptionby
energysource.
Insightsontheroleofthefinalenergy
mixontotalfinalenergyconsumption.
InsightsonthetrendsinCO
2
emissions.
Providesqualitativeinformationonwhich
endusemighthavebeenthefastest
growingoristhemostimportant.
Observedtrendsinenergynotnecessarilya
resultofimproved(orworsening)energy
efficiency.
Oneelement,amongmanyothers,
influencingtrendsinenergyconsumption.
Changescanbeattributedtoincreaseinthe
useofappliances(mostlyelectricity),
changesinfuelaccessibility,replacementof
heatingsystemsandintroductionof
regulationsandstandards.
Populationperoccupieddwelling Population.
Numberof
occupieddwelling.
Occupancyrateisoneofthefactors
influencingtrendsinenergyconsumption
(thereisaninverserelationshipbetween
occupancyratesandenergydemand).
Providelittleinformationonitsown,i.e.if
thedecreaseresultsfromadecreasein
population,theimpactonenergy
consumptionmaybenegligible.
Averagedwellingsize Totalfloorarea.
Numberof
dwellings.
Dwellingareausuallyhasamajorimpact
onenergyconsumptionforspace
heating,lightingandcooling.

Provideusefulinformationonlyforenduses
thatareimpactedbythedwellingarea.
Oneelement,amongmanyothers,
influencingtrendsinenergyconsumption.
Residentialenergyconsumptionby
energysourcepercapita
Energy
consumptionby
energysource.
Population.
Canbeconstructedformanycountries
andprovidesaconsistentbasisfor
comparison.
Providesqualitativeinformationon
whichendusemighthavebeenthe
fastestgrowing.
Theindicatorisinfluencedbythe
penetrationrateofdifferentappliances,the
numberofpeopleperhouse,thetrendsin
housesizeandhousetype,theefficiencyof
waterandspacecoolingdevices,thetypeof
lightbulbsused,theefficiencyofthe
buildingshell,etc.
Residentialenergyconsumptionper
household
Energy
consumption.
Numberof
households.
Providesageneraloverviewofthe
trendsinaggregateenergyintensity.
Whenenergyusebyenduseisnot
known,energyuseperhouseholdcanbe
Doesnotmeasureenergyefficiency
developments.
Influencedbymanyfactorsnotrelatedto
energyefficiency.
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|23

Indicator Datarequired Purpose Limitation


usedasanenergyintensityindicator.
Someimportantconclusionscanbedrawn
iftheweather,ownershipofenergyusing
appliancesanddwellingareaareknown.
E
N
E
R
G
Y

A
N
D

A
C
T
I
V
I
T
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
O
R
S

Residentialenergyconsumptionper
floorarea
Energy
consumption.
Totalfloorarea.
Monitorenergyuseintheresidential
sector.
Combinedwithenergyuseper
household,providesusefulinsightson
whatmighthavebeenthemaindriverof
energyconsumption.
Doesnotmeasureenergyefficiency
developments.
Influencedbymanyfactorsnotrelatedto
energyefficiency.
Residentialenergyconsumptionby
enduse
Energy
consumptionby
enduse.
Provideanindicationofthetrendsin
energyconsumptionandtherelative
importanceofeachenduse.
Provideanindicationofpriorityareasto
furtherimprovedatacollectionor
developenergyefficiencypolicies.
Provideslittleinformationontheimpactof
energyefficiencyonthetrendinenergy
consumptionbyenduse.
Shareoflargeappliancesenergy
consumptionintotalappliance
energyconsumption
Largeappliances
energy
consumption.
Totalappliances
energy
consumption.
Helpunderstandtrendsinenergy
consumptionfortheappliancesenduse.
Providesanindicationofwhichsegment
oftheappliancemarketisdrivingenergy
consumption.
Allowthedevelopmentofmoretargeted
policies.
Influencebytheageofthestock,the
efficiencyratingofthenewappliances
enteringthemarketandtheownership
levelamongother.
Residentialenduseenergy
consumptionbyfloorareaor
households
Energy
consumptionby
enduse.
Numberof
occupieddwellings.
Occupiedfloor
area.
Relatedto,butnotidenticalto,the
inverseofenergyefficiencies.
Usedasaproxyforenergyefficiencyin
manycountries.
Influencedbymanynonefficiencyfactors
including:type/ageofheatingequipment,
ownershiprateforappliances.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|24

Indicator Datarequired Purpose Limitation


E
N
E
R
G
Y

E
F
F
I
C
I
E
N
C
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
O
R

Decompositionofchangesinenergy
use:activity,structureandintensity
effects
Energy
consumptionby
enduse.
Population.
Dwellingarea.
Appliance
ownership.
Peopleper
dwelling.
Provideageneralunderstandingofthe
trendsthatinfluencedchangeinenergy
consumption.
Quantifytheroleoftheactivity,
structureandenduseintensitiesonthe
developmentofenergyconsumption.
Doesnotprovidehowdifferentfactorsare
impactingoneachenduse.
Decompositionofchangesinspace
heatingenergyuse:conversion
efficiency,dwellingsize,useful
intensityandoccupancyeffects
Spaceheating
energy
consumptionby
energysource.
Dwellingarea.
Peopleper
dwelling.
Population.
Allowthequantificationoftheuseful
energyintensityeffectontotalenergy
consumption(aproxyforenergy
efficiency).
Thisisthebestindicatorthatcanbe
developedforspaceheatingwiththe
datarequiredintheIEAenergyefficiency
indicatorstemplate.
Thisproxyforenergyefficiencystillincludes
effectsthatarenotrelatedtotechnical
efficiencysuchaschangesinthemixof
housingtype.

OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|25
Servicesector
The service sector includes activities related to trade, finance, real estate, public administration,
health,educationandcommercialservices.
According to IEA data, energy consumption in Russias service sector increased over 65% during
the decade between 1998 and 2008. This is largely due to a statistical readjustment in 2005.
Notably,between2005and2008,Russiasenergyconsumptionintheservicesectorhasincreased
by 17%. Given the strong economic growth Russia experienced until 2008, it is not surprising that
itsservicesectorgrewsoquickly.TheglobalfinancialcrisisalsoaffectedRussia,andwecanexpect
aslowdowninenergyconsumptionbetween2008and2009.If Russianenergyefficiencypolicies
areeffectivelyimplementedintothefuture,thiswillbevisibleinitsservicesector.
Box7.Energyefficiencytrendsinservicesector
AvailabilityofservicedatainRussiatodevelopindicators
Energyconsumption,byenergysources,isavailablefortheservicesectorfromcountrysenergy
balances. The assessment of energy efficiency improvements in the service sector requires, at
minimum,datafor:
energyconsumptionbymajorendusesandbyenergysources;
main activity variables for the sector including valueadded data in constant currency, floor
areaandnumberofemployees;and
informationonheatingandcoolingdegreedaystoadjustforweatherconditions.
GiventhatdetailedvalueaddedandemploymentdataareavailablefromRosstatforthemining
and manufacturing sectors, it is possible that this information is also available for the services
sector (ISIC 5099). Deflators are available by service category
12
from Rosstat National Accounts
to convert the value added in current Roubles to constant Roubles. The data situation for the
service sector in Russia is at par with most IEA member countries. However, it should be
emphasisedthat,atpresent,theseriouslackofdetaileddatainthissectoracrossallIEAmember
countriesmakesitdifficulttoanalysetrendsinserviceenergyconsumption.
Astheservicesectoronlyaccountsfor8%ofTFCinRussia,andgiventhedatalimitationsinthe
residential and transport sector, the IEA does not think that service should be the priority area
fordatacollection.

12
Bulk and retail trade, maintenance of automobile transport, motorcycles, household goods, and personal items, hotels and
restaurants,transportandcommunications,financialactivities,realestateoperations,rentalandprovidingservices,stategovernance
anddefence,socialsecurity,education,healthcareandsocialservices,othermunicipal,publicandpersonalservices.
Globally, service is, with transport, the fastestgrowing sector with an associated 39% increase in
energyconsumptionbetween1990and2006.In2006,servicesaccountedfor9%ofTFCand12%of
enduse sectors CO
2
emissions. Economic activity is the main driver of energy consumption in the
servicesector;itisrepresentedbythelevelofvalueaddedoutput.Inrecentyears,highereconomic
activityhasledtoincreasesinthestockofcommercialbuildingsandtomorepeoplebeingemployed
inthesector.Bothofthesefactorsincreasedemandforenergyservices.
At present, a serious lack of detailed data makes it difficult to analyse trends in service energy
consumption in most countries. The data available show a rapid increase in electricity consumption
andacorrespondingreductionintheshareoffossilfueluse.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|26
Data that IEA member countries are required to report through the IEA energy efficiency
template, as well as the number of countries that are currently able to provide the data, are
presented in Table 5. The information collected is used to develop basic energy indicators to
explainthechangesinenergyconsumptionoveraperiodoftime.
Thisbasicsetofdataisonlyastartingpoint.Itwouldallowtheserviceenergyconsumptiontobe
adjustedforweatherconditions,andwouldprovideapreliminaryanalysisofthemainconsuming
enduses. Collecting this information by type of building (health, schools, warehouses, etc.)
would support an analysis of the structure of the service sector and allow the development of
detailedindicatorsthatwouldfacilitatepolicydevelopment.
Table5:Servicedataneededtodevelopbasicenergyandenergyefficiencyindicators
Dataneededtodevelopindicators
NumberofIEAmember
countriesreportingthedata
DataavailablefromRussia
Energyconsumptionby:
Energysource 28 Yes
Enduse 3 No
Spaceheating(andbyenergysource) 3 No
Spacecooling 3 No
Lighting 2 No
Other(andbyenergysource) 3 No
Totalservicefloorarea 27 No
Floorareaaddition 27 Yes
Numberofemployees 24 Yes
Servicesvalueadded 14 No
Annualheatingdegreedays 27 No
Annualcoolingdegreedays 6 No
Note:IEAcountriescoverageindicatesthenumberofIEAmembercountriesforwhichdataarecurrentlyavailablefrom1990to2006
in the energy indicators database. Coverage for Russia is based on IEA knowledge of the data situation in Russia; which has been
validatedbytheRussianFederation.
Keyindicatorsfortheservicesector
Intheabsenceofdetailedinformationonenergyconsumption,activityandotherrelevantdata,
only general indicators can be calculated for the service sector. Some of the key indicators that
can be developed with the data reported in the template are presented in Table 6. The table
does not present indicators at the enduse level (which would be similar to those in the
residentialsector)asonlyaverylimitednumberofcountriescanreportthisinformation.

OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|27
Page|27
Table6:Keyindicatorstounderstandtrendsinenergyandenergyefficiencyinservices

Indicator Datarequired Purpose Limitation


E
N
E
R
G
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
O
R
S

Serviceenergy
consumptionby
energysource
Totalservice
energy
consumptionby
energysource.
Insightsontheroleofthefinalenergymixon
totalfinalenergyconsumption.
InsightsonthetrendsinCO
2
emissions.
Providequalitativeinformationindicatingwhich
endusemighthavebeenthefastestgrowing.
Observedtrendsinenergynotnecessarilyaresultof
improved(orworsening)energyefficiency.
Oneelement,amongmanyothers,influencingthetrends
inenergyconsumption.
Canbeinfluencedbyincreaseintheuseofoffice
equipmentsandspacecooling,introductionofregulations
andstandards,andrelativeenergyprices.
Serviceenergy
consumptionper
servicesvalue
added
Totalservice
energy
consumption.
Totalservicevalue
added(inconstant
currency).
Reflectthetrendsinoverallenergyuserelativeto
valueadded.
Indicatesthegeneralrelationshipofenergyuseto
economicdevelopment.
Dependsonfactorssuchasclimate,geographyandthe
structureoftheservicesector.
Influencedbychangeinservicesstructure.
Differentservicesectoractivitiescanproducevery
differentlevelsofeconomicoutput.
Valueaddedareinfluencedbyarangeofpricingeffects
thatareunrelatedtochangesintheenergyconsumption.
Serviceenergy
consumptionby
energysource
perfloorarea
Totalservice
energy
consumptionby
energysource.
Totalservicefloor
area.
Combinedwiththepreviousindicator,can
provideindicationsonthenatureofthesector
drivingenergyconsumption.
Canprovideinsightsontheendusedrivingthe
changeinenergyuse.
Dependsonfactorssuchasclimate,geographyandthe
structureoftheservicesector.
Influencedbychangeinservicesstructure;different
buildingtypeshaveverydifferentenergyrequirements.
Decompositionof
changesin
energy
consumption:
activity,structure
andintensity
effect
Totalservice
energy
consumption.
Totalservicevalue
added(inconstant
currency).
Servicefloorarea.
Totalnumberof
employees.
Provideageneraloverviewofthemainfactors
influencingthetrendsinservicesenergy
consumption.
Quantifytheroleofdifferentdriversonthe
aggregateenergyintensityofthesector.
Thebestindicatorthatcanbebuiltatpresent
withdataavailableatIEA.
Doesnotrepresentanestimationoftheenergyefficiency
fortheservicesector.
Influencedbymanynonefficiencyfactorssuchasthe
changesinthestructureofthebuildingsectorand
changesinenduse.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|28
Transportsector
TransportenergyconsumptioninRussiaisavailablefromtheenergybalance. However,itisnot
disaggregatedbytransportsegment(passengerandfreight).Asaresult,itisdifficulttomakeany
conclusions on the energy consumption trends in Russias passenger transport sector. Any
Moscovite can agree that since the early 1990s individual automotive vehicle ownership in
Moscow has skyrocketed, as evidenced by the major daily traffic jams. Other major cities in
Russiahaveexperiencedsimilartrends,butMoscowisbyfarthemoststriking.
In terms of the transport sector overall including both passenger and freight and all modes of
transport as reported in Russias energy balance, the transport sector saw its energy
consumptiondroptoitslowestpointin1997atlessthan2800PJ.In1998,energyconsumption
inRussiastransportsectorjumpedover16%,asignofthehugeeconomicrecoverywhichbegan
in the second half of that year. Over the period from 1998 to 2008, energy consumption in
Russiastransportsectorincreased25%.
Passengertransportsector
Passengertransportincludesthemovementofpeoplebyroad,rail,waterandair.Roadtransport
is further subdivided into lightduty vehicles (LDV) and buses. Only domestic air and water are
included;internationalairandwatertravelarenotcovered.
Box8.Energyefficiencytrendsinpassengertransportsector
AvailabilityofpassengertransportdatainRussiatodevelopindicators
Inmanycountries,passengertransportrepresentsasignificantandgrowingshareoftotalenergy
consumption. In order to develop useful energy efficiency indicators in this sector, a large
numberofdataarerequired.IntheIEAenergyefficiencyindicatorstemplate,theminimalsetof
datarequiredtodevelopindicatorsinclude:
Energyconsumptionbytransportationmode;
Informationonthepassengertransportationfleetbymode(stockofvehicles);

13
IEA19includesAustralia,Austria,Canada,Denmark,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Ireland,Italy,Japan,theNetherlands,New
Zealand,Norway,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,theUnitedKingdomandtheUnitedStates.
Global passenger transport energy consumption data are not available from a countrys energy
balances, as energy balances report only total transportation. As a result, analysis of the sector can
be performed for only 19 IEA member countries.
13
For those 19 countries, passenger transport
energyconsumptionbetween1990and2006increasedby24%,withthesharesofthevariousmodes
remaining quite stable. Lightduty vehicles are, by far, the largest energy consumer, accounting for
87%oftheenergyconsumption.
Passengerkilometres (pkm) and the efficiency of passenger transport modes (energy consumption
perpkm)arethetwomaindeterminantsofenergyconsumption.Bothareaffectedbyawiderange
of interacting factors such as: occupancy rate of vehicles; distance travelled; density of population;
vehicleownership;incomelevelsofdrivers;localtransportpolicies;andpriceoffuel.Indicatorsthat
canbebuiltwithavailabledatafromtheIEAenergyefficiencyindicatorstemplateshowthatonlyone
factor helped to restrain growth in road transport energy demand: energy efficiency. Energy
efficiencyforLDVsimprovedby6%since1990.
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|29
Passengerkilometresbymode;and
Vehiclekilometresbymode.
TransportenergyconsumptioninRussiaisonlyavailablefromtheenergybalance;thesedataare
disaggregated by mode (road, rail, water and air) but not by transport segment (passenger and
freight).Asaresult,itiscurrentlynotpossibletodevelopindicatorsforthissector.
Most activity data are available from Rosstat and disseminated in the publications Main
IndicatorsofTransportPerformancesinRussia(Rosstat,2010a)andTransportinRussia(Rosstat,
2010b). For passenger transport, available information includes passengerkilometres, vehicle
kilometresandvehiclestockforbuses,trainsandairplanes.InformationforLDVisnotavailable.
As LDV generally represents the most important transportation mode, priority should focus on
collectingactivitydataforthistransportationmode.
Activity variables are equally important for developing indicators. As is the case for energy
consumption, activity data can be collected or estimated through different means. Different
countries are adopting different strategies to collect or develop passenger transport energy
consumption and activity data: survey targeting households for LDVs; collecting information
through fleet managers or operators for buses and trains; and developing modelling analysis to
estimate energy consumption. The strategy adopted depends on several factors such as the
availabilityofdatadrivingenergyconsumption,theexistenceofsurveysthatcanbeamendedto
includemorequestions,etc.
The IEA identified potential sources of data that can constitute a starting point for estimating
energy consumption by mode in the passenger transport sector, such as data available from
administrative sources e.g. vehicle registration, information collected during the mandatory car
annualverification,anddataavailablefromresearchinstitutes.Giventhenatureofadministrative
data,thecollectionofinformationfromthissourcemayrequire(asisthecaseinsomeIEAmember
countries)anofficialagreementbetweenallthepartiesinvolvedtosupportanadequateuseofthe
informationandensurethattheconfidentialityofinformationismaintained.
Data that member countries are required to report to the IEA through the energy efficiency
indicatortemplate,thenumberofcountriesthatarecurrentlyabletoprovidethedataaswell
asthedatacurrentlyavailablefromRosstatarepresentedinTable7.Theinformationcollected
isusedtodevelopbasicindicatorstoexplainthechangesinenergyconsumptionoveraperiod
of time. Countries would benefit by complementing the data requested in the template with
moredetailedinformationon,forexample,thevehiclestockturnover,size/classofvehicleand
travelpatterns.
Keyindicatorsforthepassengertransportsector
Numerous indicators, providing useful information to better understand the trends in energy
consumptionandenergyefficiency,canbedevelopedwiththeminimalsetofdataavailablefrom
the IEA energy efficiency indicators template. The key indicators are presented in Table 8 along
withanexplanationoftheirpurposeandlimitations.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|30
Table7:Passengertransportdataneededtodevelopbasicenergyandenergyefficiencyindicators
Dataneededtodevelopindicators
NumberofIEAmember
countriesreportingthedata
DataavailablefromRussia
Energyconsumptionby:
Energysource 25 Yes
Transportationmode 21 No
Cars, Sport utility vehicles (SUVs)
andpersonallighttrucks
22 No
Motorcyclesandthreewheelers 10 No
Buses 22 No
Passengertrain 24 No
Domesticpassengerairplane 23 No
Domesticpassengerships 5 No
Passengerkilometresby: 20 No
Cars,SUVsandpersonallighttrucks 26 No
Motorcyclesandthreewheelers 6 No
Buses 23 Yes
Passengertrain 25 Yes
Domesticpassengerairplane 20 Yes
Domesticpassengerships 4 Yes
Vehiclekilometresby: No
Cars,SUVsandpersonallighttrucks 23 No
Motorcyclesandthreewheelers 11 No
Buses 19 No
Passengertrain 2 No
Domesticpassengerairplane 3 No
Domesticpassengerships 1 No
Vehiclestocksby:
Cars,SUVsandpersonallighttrucks 26 No
Motorcyclesandthreewheelers 24 Yes
Buses 25 Yes
Passengertrain 0 Yes
Domesticpassengerairplane 0 No
Domesticpassengerships 1 No
Note:IEAcountriescoverageindicatesthenumberofIEAmembercountriesforwhichdataarecurrentlyavailablefrom1990to2006
in the energy indicators database. Coverage for Russia is based on IEA knowledge of the data situation in Russia; which has been
validatedbytheRussianFederation.

OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|31
Table8:Keyindicatorstounderstandtrendsinenergyandenergyefficiencyinpassengertransport

Indicator Datarequired Purpose Limitation


E
N
E
R
G
Y

A
N
D

A
C
T
I
V
I
T
Y

N
D
I
C
A
T
O
R
S

Shareofpassenger
kilometresbymode
Passengerkilometresby
mode.
Provideassessmentofthechangeinthe
shareofmodes.
Provideusefulqualitativeinformationon
activitytrendsinthesector.
Providequalitativeinformationonhow
changeinactivityinfluenceschangein
energyconsumption.
Onlyactivitydriven,doesnotprovideameasure
ofenergyefficiency.
Travelpatternsareinfluencedbymanydiverse
factorssuchasincome,ageprofileofdrivers,
genderofdrivers,householdsize,flexibleworking
andleisureactivities,geographiccharacteristics
andlocaltransportpolicies.
Energyuseper
passengerkilometre
bytransportation
mode
Passengertransport
energyconsumptionby
transportmode.
Passengerkilometresby
transportmode.
Energyintensitiesbymodeisa
meaningfulsummaryindicator.
Intensitiescanbeusedtohelpdevelop
transportationenergypolicies.
Stillaffectedbyfactorsthatarenotrelatedto
energyefficiencysuchasvehicleweightforLDV,
vehicleoccupancyandvehiclefeatures.
Ifdevelopedattheaggregatelevel(totalLDV)
maymaskimportantstructuralchanges(number
ofcarscomparedtoSUVs).
E
N
E
R
G
Y

E
F
F
I
C
I
E
N
C
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
O
R
S

LDVfuelintensity StockofLDV.
LDDvehiclekilometres.
LDVenergyconsumption.
Provideinsightsontheactualfuel
economyofthevehiclestock.
AsopposedtoLVDenergyuseper
passengerkilometre,itisnotinfluence
byvehicleoccupancy.
Ifdevelopedattheaggregatelevel(totalLDV)
maymaskimportantstructuralchanges(shift
fromcarstoSUVsinsomecountries.
Decompositionof
changesintotal
passengerenergyuse:
activity,structureand
intensityeffects
Passengertransport
energyconsumptionby
mode.
Passengerkilometresby
mode.
Quantifythefactorsinfluencingchanges
inenergyconsumption.
Doesnotrevealhowdifferentfactors,suchasan
increaseincarownership,areaffectingeach
transportmode.
Decompositionof
changesinLDVenergy
use:ownershipeffect,
usageeffectandfuel
intensityeffect.
LDVenergyconsumption.
StockofLDV.
Population.
Distancetravelled.
QuantifytheeffectofLDVfuelintensity
(aproxyforenergyefficiency)onLDV
energyconsumption.
Thebestindicatorthatcanbedeveloped
forLDVwiththedatarequiredintheIEA
energyefficiencyindicatorstemplate.
Includeseffectsthatarenotrelatedtolabtested
fueleconomysuchassizeofvehiclesand
geographicconditions.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|32
Freighttransportsector
Freight transport includes the domestic movement of goods by road, rail, air and ships water.
Transportthroughpipelinesisexcluded.
Box9.Energyefficiencytrendsinfreighttransportsector
AvailabilityoffreighttransportdatainRussiatodevelopindicators
Inordertodevelopusefulenergyand energyefficiencyindicatorsinthissector,alargenumber
of data are required. In the IEA energy efficiency indicators template, the minimal set of data
requiredtodevelopindicatorsinclude:
Energyconsumptionbytransportationmode;
Informationonthefreighttransportationfleetbymode(stockofvehicles);
Tonnekilometresbymode;and
Loadfactorsbymode.
TransportenergyconsumptioninRussiaisavailableonlyfromtheenergybalance;thesedataare
disaggregated by mode (road, rail, water and air) but not by transport segment (passenger and
freight). As a result, it is currently not possible to develop indicators for the freight transport
sector. It is essential to collect or develop the energy consumption information to develop
indicators. As is the case in the passenger transport segment, different countries are adopting
different strategies to collect or develop this information such as usage of truck fuel meter;
collectinginformationthroughfleetmanagersoroperators;anddevelopingmodellinganalysisto
estimateenergyconsumption.Thestrategyadopteddependsonseveralfactors.
Activity variables are equally important for developing indicators. While tonnekilometres
provide the basis for developing freight transport indicators, it is important to complement this
information with load factors (as there is a strong correlation between changes in load factors
and changes in the intensity of truck freight haulage) and stock of vehicles. As is the case for
energyconsumption,activitydatacanbecollectedorestimatedthroughdifferentmeans.

14
WhileairfreighttransportdataarerequestedintheIEAindicatorsdatabase,theanalysisexcludesthismodebecauseoflackof
dataseparatingdomesticandinternationaljourney.
15
IEA 19 includes Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands,
NewZealand,Norway,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,theUnitedKingdomandtheUnitedStates.
Asisthecasewithpassengertransport,freighttransport
14
energyconsumptiondataarenotavailable
fromcountryenergybalancesandtheanalysiscanbeperformedonlyfor19IEAmembercountries.
15

For these 19 countries, freight transport energy consumption increased by 31% between 1990 and
2006. Trucks are by far the largest energy user, accounting for 83% of the overall freight transport
energyconsumptionin2006.
Theenergyintensitiesoftrucks,trainsandshipsvarysignificantly.Forthe19countriesforwhichthe
information is available, trains are the most energy efficient mode of freight transport. On average,
for the 19 countries, it requires 10 times less energy to transport one tonne of goods over one
kilometre by train than by truck. The difference in intensity between modes has important
implications for energy consumption trends: because of its much higher energy intensity, growth in
truckfreighthaulagedrivesupenergyconsumptionmuchmorequicklythangrowthintrainsorships.
Consequently, efforts to reduce the intensity of trucking will lead to higher energy savings than
reductionsintrainsandships.Importantenergysavingscanalsobeachievedbyincreasingtheshare
ofrail,shipsandairinfreighttransport.
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|33
Table9:Freighttransportdataneededtodevelopbasicenergyandenergyefficiencyindicators
Dataneededtodevelopindicators
NumberofIEAmember
countriesreportingthedata
Dataavailablefrom
Russia
Energyconsumptionby:
Energysource 24 No
Transportationmode 21 No
Freightandcommercialroad
transport
22 No
Freighttrains 4 No
Domesticfreightairplanes 5 No
Domesticfreightships 22 No
Freighttonnekilometres
16
by: 24 Yes
Freightandcommercialroadtransport 19 Yes
Freighttrains 0 Yes
Domesticfreightairplanes 0 Yes
Domesticfreightships 0 Yes
Freighttonnestransport
17
by: Yes
Freightandcommercialroadtransport 6 Yes
Freighttrains 5 Yes
Domesticfreightairplanes 4 Yes
Domesticfreightships 3 Yes
Vehiclekilometresby:
Freightandcommercialroadtransport 20 No
Freighttrains 3 No
Domesticfreightairplanes 0 No
Domesticfreightships 0 No
Vehiclestocks
18
by:
Freightandcommercialroadtransport 25 Yes
Freighttrains 0 Yes
Domesticfreightairplanes 0 No
Domesticfreightships 0 No
Note:IEAcountriescoverageindicatesthenumberofIEAmembercountriesforwhichdataarecurrentlyavailablefrom1990to2006
in the energy indicators database. Coverage for Russia is based on IEA knowledge of the data situation in Russia; which has been
validatedbytheRussianFederation.
Activity data are available from Rosstat and disseminated in the publications Main Indicators of
TransportPerformancesinRussia(Rosstat,2010a)andTransport inRussia (Rosstat,2010b).The

16
Coversonlylargecompanies;smalltruckingfirmsandindividualownersarenotincluded.
17
Coversonlylargecompanies;smalltruckingfirmsandindividualownersarenotincluded.
18
Coversonlylargecompanies;smalltruckingfirmsandindividualownersarenotincluded.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|34
availableinformationincludestonnekilometres,loadfactorsandvehiclekilometres.Theactivity
data are available for trucks, trains and planes. No information is available for ships. However,
the information collected by Rosstat is currently available only for large companies; small
truckingfirmsandindividualownersarenotincluded.Butadditionalquestionsthatwillbeadded
to the National Household Budget Survey may help in gathering information on individual
vehiclesusedforfreighttransportation.
Other potential existing sources of data (such as administrative data, or data from research
institutes) can constitute a starting point for estimating freight transport energy consumption
bymode.
Data that member countries are required to report to the IEA through the energy efficiency
indicatortemplate,thenumberofcountriesthatarecurrentlyabletoprovidethedataaswellas
the data currently available from Rosstat are presented in Table 9. The information collected is
used to develop basic energy indicators to explain the changes in energy consumption over a
period of time. This is a starting point for developing indicators. Countries would benefit by
complementing the data requested in the template with more detailed information on, for
example, the vehicle stock turnover, the size/class of trucks, or the empty versus loaded
kilometrestravelled.
Keyindicatorsforthefreighttransportsector
The information required in the indicators database allows the development of the key energy
andenergyefficiencyindicatorspresentedinTable10.

OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|35
Page|35
Table10:Keyindicatorstounderstandtrendsinenergyandenergyefficiencyinfreighttransport

Indicator Datarequired Purpose Limitation


E
N
E
R
G
Y

A
N
D

A
C
T
I
V
I
T
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
O
R
S

Shareoftonne
kilometresby
mode
Freighttransporttonne
kilometresbymode.
Provideassessmentofthechangeinthe
shareofmodes.
Provideusefulqualitativeinformationon
activitytrendsinthesector.
Providequalitativeinformationonhow
changeinactivityinfluencechangeinenergy
consumption.
Onlyactivitydriven,doesnotprovideameasureof
energyefficiency.
Tonnekilometresareinfluencedbymanyfactorssuch
asavailabilityofinfrastructure,capacityutilisation,
typeofgoodsmoved,andthesizeandgeographyof
thecountry.
Energyuseper
tonne
kilometreby
transportation
mode
Freighttransportenergy
consumptionbymode.
Freighttransporttonne
kilometresbymode.
Energyintensitiesbymodearemeaningful
summaryindicators.
Intensitiescanbeusedtohelpdevelop
transportationenergypolicies.
Stillaffectedbyfactorsthatarenotrelatedtoenergy
efficiencysuchasvehicleweightfortrucksandload
factors.
Maymaskimportantstructuralchangesintheroad
segment.
Truckaverage
loadpervehicle
Truckaverageloadper
vehicle.
Helpexplainthechangesintruckenergy
consumptionpertonnekilometres.
Strongcorrelationbetweenchangesinload
factorsandchangesintheenergyintensityof
truckfreighthaulage.
Thisindicator,takenbyitself,doesnotprovide
indicationonthetrendinenergyefficiencyfortrucks.
Theaverageloadcanresultfromthechangeinthe
compositionofthefleet.
E
N
E
R
G
Y

E
F
F
I
C
I
E
N
C
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
O
R

Decomposition
ofchangesin
energyuse:
activity,
structureand
intensity
effects.
Freighttransportenergy
consumptionbymode.
Freighttransporttonne
kilometresbymode.
Quantifythefactorsinfluencingchangein
energyconsumption.

Doesnotprovidehowdifferentfactors,forexample
changeintheloadfactors,areaffectingeach
transportmode.
Moredetailedinformationisrequiredtodevelop
strongindicatorstobettersupportdevelopmentof
energyefficiencypolicies.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|36
Conclusionsandnextsteps
Developing, applying and deriving benefit from energy efficiency indicators implies a longterm
commitment to collecting and analysing a broader range of energy data. Many IEA member
governments have taken decades to establish effective and leastcost data collection systems
based on strong coordination among the main statistical agency and other departments and
agenciesandtheprivatesector.
The IEA is keen to continue its work with Russia in this area. Given the political momentum
generated by the presidents ambitious energy efficiency goals, the time is ripe for a push
forward on developing such a coordinated system of data collection for energy efficiency
indicators.Moreover,thereisnowanincreasingandrealisticunderstandingoftheavailabilityof
dataneeded(andthegapsindata)tounderpintheprovisionofenergyefficiencyindicators.
AkeymessagetheIEAhasbeenpromotingindiscussionswithRussiancounterpartsistheneed
toprioritiserequirementsforenergyefficiencyindicators.Specifically,theIEArecommendsthat
this be done in consultation between energy experts (who are involved in the design,
implementation and monitoring of energy efficiency policies) and statistical and analytical
experts (who are responsible for the collection and analysis of data). Currently, data collectors
areoverwhelmedbytheproposalsforcollectionofmanydifferentdata.Moreover,thecreation
ofanoverlylargeandcomplexsystemofenergyefficiencyindicatorsmayprovetohavealimited
value added. At this early stage, Russia may derive greater value from a more simple set of
indicators that concentrate on key aspects of energy efficiency in high energy intensity sectors
suchasindustry,transportandresidential.
While the clear commitment at the highest political level in Russia for substantial energy
efficiencyiswidelyrecognised,thereisnotyetconsensusonthekeyindicatorsneededbythose
developing energy efficiency policy and monitoring its implementation. Given the crossagency
natureofenergyefficiencyindicators,itmaybebeneficialtoformacrossgovernmentalworking
group to improve coordination. The working group should ideally include all the major players,
including government departments and institutions, and, where appropriate, research
institutionsandtradebodies(particularlywheretheseholdrelevantdataoranalyticalexpertise).
Therecouldbebenefitinaconcretefocus,forexample,suchashavingtheworkinggroupinitially
explorecoordinationneedsinRussiastransportsector,whichtheIEAfoundtohavethelargest
data gaps. Russia is not unique in this respect: the transport sector is one of the most difficult
sector in which to collect reliable data. The IEA has singled out the approaches of New Zealand
and the United Kingdom as best practice examples; both countries have published reports
19

outliningtheirdatacollectionsysteminthissector.
This crossgovernmental working group should take into account wide international experience,
including that of the IEA, the European Union and individual countries. A coordinating body
couldbeidentifiedtotaketheleadonthis,suchastheRussianEnergyAgency.
The IEA stands ready to continue working with Russia in this important area to ensure the
effective implementation of its Law on Energy Efficiency and the achievement of its ambitious
energyefficiencygoals.

19
Transport Statistics Great Britain, Department of Transport, 2009 Edition; and New Zealand Transport Statistics, Ministry of
Transport,July2009.
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|37
AnnexA.TheIEAindicatorapproach
Governments around the world are facing the complex and interlinked challenges of reducing
energy consumption and associated GHG emissions while also meeting economic development
goals. There is a growing recognition that improving energy efficiency is often the most
economic,provenandreadilyavailablemeanstodothis.
Trackingtrendsinenergyefficiencyisnotaneasytask.Whileoverallenergyconsumptionmaybe
increasingduetorobustGDPgrowthand/oranexpandingpopulation,energyefficiencymaywell
be improving. Energy efficiency is only one of a number of factors that impact energy use. As
such, it is possible to have improving energy efficiency while still seeing increases in energy
consumption. Some factors that may cause (explain) growth in energy consumption include:
populationgrowth;acolderorwarmerthanusualwinter;achangeinstructureoftheindustrial
sector; an increase in wealth (as measured by GDP per capita); an increase in the level of
ownershipofappliancesand/orequipment;andachangeinconsumerbehaviourorpreferences.
Disentangling these various factors that drive and restrain energy use is the key purpose of
energyindicators.Inthisrespect,energyindicatorsprovidepolicymakerswiththetoolstomake
informed policy decisions to target the key enduse area or consumer behaviour that is driving
energyconsumption.
ThebenefitsoftheIEAapproach
The IEA indicator approach uses a pyramid that portrays a hierarchy of energy indicators from
most detailed (at the bottom of the pyramid) to least detailed (at the top of the pyramid). This
illustrates conceptually how the most detailed and disaggregated data and indicators can be
combined to reveal the more aggregated ones higher up on the pyramid. This hierarchy is
important because it shows how detailed changes (which may be the result of policies,
technological progress, structural reform or behavioural change) can be linked to higher order,
more aggregate quantities, showing how the former affects the latter. With this hierarchy, one
can better explain more aggregate changes in energy use in terms of components and more
carefully choose the depth of analysis required. This hierarchy will be different from country to
countryasitdependsonthedataavailabilityandthequestionsthatneedtobeanswered.
Examples:
The five most energy intensive industrial sectors are pulp and paper, chemicals and
petrochemicals, iron and steel, cement and aluminium. Because of their much higher energy
intensity, growth in these industrial sectors will drive up energy consumption much more
quicklythangrowthinlessintensivesectors.Forexampleanincreaseincement,usingabout
20 Megajoules (MJ) per unit of GDP, will have a much bigger impact on energy consumption
thananincreaseinthefabricationofmetalproducts,usinglessthan5MJperunitofGDP.
In the iron and steel sector, a relative decrease in the use of open hearth furnace (a very
intensive process)willhaveadownwardeffectonenergy consumption.Soa decreaseinthe
iron and steel intensity (in terms of energy use per unit of production) will not necessarily
indicate an improvement in energy efficiency in a particular production process: it can be
causedbyaswitchofproductionfromopenhearthfurnacestoblastfurnaces.
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|38
TheIEAindicatorpyramid
Thetoprowofthepyramid(themostaggregateindicator)isdefinedastheratioofenergyuse
to gross domestic product (GDP). Alternatively, it could be defined as the ratio of energy use to
anothermacroeconomicvariable,suchaspopulation.
The second row of elements can be defined as the energy intensity of each major sector, as
measuredbyenergyuseperunitofactivityineachsector.
Lower rows represent the subsectors or enduses that make up each sector and progressively
providemoredetaile.g.characterisingparticularprocessesorappliances.
Joiningeachlevelofenergyintensitiesarestructuralvariablesthatindicatehowtoweightthese
intensitiestoformamoreaggregateparameterofintensityoruse.Descendinglower downthe
pyramidrequiresmoredataandmorecomplexanalysistoreaggregatebackuptoahigherlevel.
However, each descent also provides a better measure of technical energy efficiency defined
foraspecifictechnology,processand/orenduse,butalsorequiredmoredata.
FigureA.1:TheIEAindicatorpyramid
Note:Indicatorsshownarejustonexampleamongthoseavailable.

D
e
g
r
e
e

o
f

d
i
s
a
g
g
r
e
g
a
t
i
o
n

TFC/GDP
Sectoralenergy
intensity
Enduseenergyintensity
Unitenergyconsumption
Aggregated
indicators
IEAstatistics
Disaggregated
indicators
IEAindicator
database
Process/appliance
indicators
LimitedIEA
indicators
Data requi rement
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|39
Exampleofindicatorpyramid:Industrysector
Theindustrysectorcoversthemanufactureoffinishedgoodsandproducts,miningandquarrying
of raw materials, and construction. Power generation, refineries and the distribution of
electricity,gasandwaterareexcluded.
The industrial pyramid shows how this sector can be disaggregated and the different indicators
thatcanbeusedateachlevel(FigureA.2).Thisisonlyanillustrationandmaynotberelevantfor
allcountries.
FigureA.2:Industrysectorpyramid

Note:Russiahasverydetailedenergyandproductionstatisticsforindustry.However,itisnotpossibletoaggregatethemtohigher
levels in the pyramid due to lack of associated GDP data in constant currency. For IEA countries, the IEA database contains
informationatLevel2for21membercountriesintheindustrialsector.Somecountrieshavemoredetailedinformationthanwhatis
availableintheIEAdatabase.
Level1: EnergyuseperGDP.
Structureadjustedintensity.
Level2: Energyuseperunitofproduction.
EnergyuseperGDP.
Level3:Energyuseperunitofproduction.
EnergyuseperGDP(notavailablefor
Russia).
Level 4: Energy use by
processes.
Pulp
and
Paper
Iron
and
Steel
Cement Etc.
Total
Industry
Chem.
pulping
News
print
Etc.
Digestion
Washing
Etc.
DataavailablefromRussiastatistics
DatarequestedinIEAdatabase
DataavailableforIEAandRussia
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|40
Level1:Totalindustrysector
The commonly used indicator at the aggregate level is energy use per unit of GDP. This ratio
measures how much energy is needed to produce one unit of economic output. However, it
wouldbemisleadingtoevaluatetheperformanceofenergyefficiencybasedonthisindicatoras
it is affected by many nonenergy efficiency factors such as the structure of the industry, the
qualityofresourcesand,forsomeindustrialsectors,weatherconditions.
For this reason, many countries develop structureadjusted intensity for the total industrial
sector. Constructing the structureadjusted indicator requires the energy use and GDP data at
Level2or3ofthepyramid.
Level2andlevel3:Industrysectors
The industries represented in Level 2 and 3 usually differ by country according to the data
availableandtherelativeimportanceofeachindustry.
Attheselevels,thebestindicatortoassessenergyefficiencyisenergyuseperunitofproduction.
However,assomeindustriesaretooheterogeneoustohaveonemeasureofproduction,GDP(or
anothermonetaryvaluesuchasgrossoutput)isthesecondbestchoice.
Level4:Processindicators
The IEA indicator database does not contain information on Level 4. Only a limited number of
countries have this information for a limited number of industries. However, even partial
informationatthislevelcanhelpexplainthetrendsinenergyconsumption.
Exampleofindicatorpyramid:Residentialsector
The residential sector includes those activities related to private dwellings. It covers all energy
using activities in apartments and houses, including space and water heating, cooling, lighting
and the use of appliances. It does not include personal transport, which is covered in the
transportsector.
There are numerous ways to define the analytical framework in the residential sector. The level
ofdetailselectedgreatlydependsontheinformationavailable.Forexample,Canadaisusingtwo
different pyramids: one for enduses with energy consumption related to the number of
householdsandoneforenduseswithenergyconsumptionrelatedthefloorarea.Theindicators
arethenaggregatedbyusingweightedenergyconsumption.
Theexamplebelowshowsthetwoindicatorspyramidsfortheresidentialsector.Thesepyramids
would be applicable to countries with rather detailed enduse data. This is not the case in each
country. As previously mentioned, the pyramid should be adapted to account for countries
specificitiesanddatasituation.

OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|41
FigureA.3:Residentialsectorpyramidbasedonfloorarea

Note:ForRussia,theinformationisnotavailablebyenduses;butifthepyramidistobedefinedwithoutthebreakdownbyenduse,
itwouldbepossibletodotheanalysisattheLevel2.Informationbyhousetypeandbyhousingsystemsisavailableinsomecountries
(suchasCanada).However,thisinformationisnotcollectedbytheIEA.TheIEAdatabasecontainsinformationforlevels1,3and5for
19IEAmembercountries.SomecountrieshavemoredetailedinformationthanwhatisavailableintheIEAdatabase.
Single
detached
houses
Single
attached
houses
Apartment Mobile
homes
Normal
efficiency
furnace
Mid
efficiency
furnace
High
efficient
furnace
Other
equip.
Centralair
conditioning
Windowair
conditioning
NO
FURTHER
DETAIL
NO
FURTHER
DETAIL
NO
FURTHER
DETAIL
Total
energy
relatedto
floorarea
Space
heating
Space
cooling
Lighting
Oil Wood Gas
Level1: Energyuse(lightingandspace
heatingandcooling)byfloorarea.
Level2: Energyuse(lightingandspace
heatingandcooling)byhousetypeandby
floorarea.
Level3:Enduseenergyusebyfloorarea
(andbyhousetypewhereavailable).
Level4:Equipmentenergy useby
floorarea(andbyhousetype
whereavailable).
Level5: Fuelspecific
equipmentenergyuseby
households(andbyhouse
typewhereavailable).
DatarequestedinIEAdatabase
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|42
FigureA.4:Residentialsectorpyramidbasedonhousehold

Note:ForRussia,theinformationisnotavailablebyenduses;butifthepyramidistobedefinedwithoutthebreakdownbyenduse,
itwouldbepossibletodotheanalysisattheLevel2.Informationbyhousetypeandbyhousingsystemsisavailableinsomecountries
(suchasCanada).However,thisinformationisnotcollectedbytheIEA.TheIEAdatabasecontainsinformationforlevels1,3,4and5
with the number of country reporting the data to IEA depending on the level of the pyramid. Some countries have more detailed
informationthanwhatisavailableintheIEAdatabase.
Single
detached
houses
Single
attached
houses
Apartment Mobile
homes
Total
energy
relatedto
household
Water
heating
Large
appliances
Small
appliances
Wood Electricity FridgeFreezer
Gas
Clothes
washer
Clothes
dryer
Range
gas
Elect
Unitenergyconsumptionfor
newandstockofappliances
Oil Gas
Elect
Level4:Fuelspecificwater
heatingandappliancetype
energyusebyhouseholds(and
byhousetypewhereavailable).
Level1: Energyuse(waterheatingand
appliances)byhouseholds.
Level2: Energyuse(waterheatingand
appliances)byhousetypeand
households.Housetypesarelessrelevant
forhouseholdrelatedenduses.
Level3:Enduseenergyusebyhousehold
(andbyhousetypewhereavailable).
Level5:Fuelspecific
applianceenergyuseby
households.
DatarequestedinIEAdatabase
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|43
Exampleofindicatorpyramid:Servicesector
Theservicesectorincludesactivitiesrelatedtotrade,finance,realestate,publicadministration,
health,educationandcommercialservices.
Very few countries are able to analyse the energy efficiency trends in the service sector. The
general aggregate indicator used is service energy consumption by unit of value added in the
service sector. However, different service sector activities can produce very different levels of
economicoutputwhile consumingnearlythesame amountofenergy.Forexample,buildingsin
thefinancesectorcanhavethesamefinalenergydemandprofileasbuildingsintheretailsector,
yetgeneratesignificantlydifferentlevelsofeconomicoutput.
Energy consumption by floor area is considered by some countries as the best indicator for
thissector.
FigureA.5:Servicesectorpyramid

Notes:ForRussia,totalenergyconsumptionandvalueaddeddataareavailable.ForIEAmembercountries,onlythreecountriesreport
energyusebyendusetotheIEA(Level3).Onlysevencountriesreporttotalservicefloorarea.TheIEAisanalysingtheservicesector
intensitybasedonvalueadded.SomecountrieshavemoredetailedinformationthanwhatisavailableintheIEAdatabase.

Offices Educational
services
Health
care
Etc
Total
service
sector
Space
heating
Water
heating
Auxiliary
equipment
Auxiliary
motors
Lighting
Oil
Elect. Gas
Space
cooling
Etc.
DatarequestedinIEAdatabase
Level1:Energyuseperfloorarea
Energyusepervalueadded.
Level2:Energyusebybuildingtypeperfloorarea.
Level3:Energyusebyenduse,by
buildingtypeandperfloorarea.
Level4: Energyusebyfuel
type,byenduse,by
buildingtypeandperfloor
area.
DataavailableforIEAandRussiaonapervalueaddedbasis
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|44
Exampleofindicatorpyramid:Transportsector
The transport sector includes the movement of people and goods by road, rail, water and air.
Pipelinesandinternationalairandwatertransportareexcludedfromtheanalysis.
Whileitispossibletopresentenergyuseforthetotaltransportsector,amoredetailedanalysis
of this sector requires passenger and freight transport to be analysed separately since they are
affectedbydifferentunderlyingfactors.
FigureA.6:Passengertransportsectorpyramid

Notes:Onlyactivityinformationforbuses,airandrailisavailableforRussia.TheIEAdatabasedoesnotcontaininformationbytypeof
buses. Ships are not included in the IEA analysis due to lack of information. In the IEA database, lightduty vehicles are only
disaggregated only between motorcycles and other LDVs. Some countries have more detailed information than what is available in
theIEAdatabase.

Ships
Urban
Inter
city
School
bus
Level1: Energyusebypassengerkilometres.
Level2: Energyusebymodebypassengerkilometres.
Level3:Energyusebyvehicletypeby
passengerkilometres.
Level4:EnergyusebyLDVtypeby
passengerkilometres.
Level5: Energyusebyfueltype
bypassengerkilometres
Fueleconomypervehicle.
DatarequestedinIEAdatabase
Air
Road
transport
Rail
Total
passenger
transport
Light
duty
vehicles
DieselMotor
gasoline
Etc.
Small
cars
Large
cars
Light
duty
trucks
Motor
cycle
Buses
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|45
FigureA.7:Freighttransportsectorpyramid

Notes:OnlyactivityinformationisavailableforRussia.TheIEAdatabasedoesnotcontaininformationbytypeofroadfreightvehicles.
AirtravelisnotincludedintheIEAanalysisduetolackofinformation.Somecountrieshavemoredetailedinformationthanwhatis
availableintheIEAdatabase.

Light
duty
trucks
Medium
trucks
Heavy
trucks
DatarequestedinIEAdatabase
Level1:Energyusebytonnekilometres.
Level2: Energyusebymodebytonne
kilometres.
Level3:Roadtransportenergyuseby
tonnekilometres.
Level4:Energyusebyfuel
typebypassenger
kilometres.
Fueleconomypervehicle.
Air
Total
freight
transport
Diesel Motor
gasoline
Etc.
Road
transport
Ships Rail
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|46
AnnexB.TheIEAmethodologyforanalysingenergy
consumption
Thedecompositionofchangesinenergyconsumption
The analysis of energy enduse trends distinguishes between three main components affecting
energyconsumption:aggregateactivity,sectoralstructureandenergyintensities(seeTableB.1
formoredetails).
Aggregate activity (A) is measured in one of the following ways, depending on the sector: as
valueaddedformanufacturingindustryandservices;aspopulationintheresidentialsector;or
as passengerkilometres and tonnekilometres, respectively, for the passenger and freight
transportsectors.
Sectoral structure(S)representsthe mixofactivitieswithinasectorandfurtherdividesactivity
intoindustrysubsectors,measuresofresidentialenduseactivityortransportationmodes.
Energyintensity(I)referstoenergyuseperunitofactivity.
To separate the effect of various components over time, the IEA uses a factoral decomposition
approachthatanalyseschangesinenergyusewithinasector,usingthefollowingequation:
F = A (S
r
I
r
)
r

Inthisdecomposition,thesymbolsrepresentthefollowingparameters:
E Totalenergyuseinasector.
A Overallsectoralactivity.
r Subsectorsorenduseswithinagivensector.
S
r
Shareofsubsectororenduserinasector.
I
r
Energyintensityofeachsubsectororenduser.
The activity effect can be calculated as the relative impact on energy use that would have
occurredinyeartifthestructureandenergyintensitiesforasectorhadremainedfixedattheir
baseyearvalues(t=0)whileaggregateactivityhadfolloweditsactualdevelopment.
F
t
A
=
A
t
(S

r
I

r
)
r
F


Similarly, the structure effect is determined by making the calculation using constant aggregate
activityandenergyintensitiesbutvaryingthesectoralstructure.
F
t
S
=
A

(S
t
r
I

r
)
r
F


The intensity effect is calculated by assuming that the sectoral structure and aggregate activity
for a sector had remained fixed at the base year values while energy intensities had followed
theiractualdevelopment.
F
t
I
=
A

(S

r
I
t
r
)
r
F


OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|47
Thus, by calculating the relative impact on energy use from changes in each of these
components, it is possible to isolate the impacts on energy use related to improved enduse
energyefficiency(reductionsinenergyintensities)i.e.toseparatetheseimpactsfromchanges
derivingfromshiftsintheactivityandstructurecomponents.
Inthisanalysis,thehypotheticalenergyuse(HEU
I
)isdefinedastheenergyusethatwouldhave
occurredinyeartifenergyintensitiesineachsectorremainedconstantattheirbaseyearvalues.
Itiscalculatedbydividingactualenergyuseinyeartbytheintensityeffectinthatyear.
HFU
t
I
=
F
t
F
t
I

Energy savings from reduced energy intensities can be defined as the difference between the
hypotheticalenergyuseandactualenergyuse.
SAFIN6S
t
I
= HFU
t
I
- F
t

TableB.1.:Summaryofvariablesusedforthedecomposition
Sector Subsector Activity(A) Structure(S) Intensity(I)
Residential

Spaceheating Population
Floorarea / population Spaceheating
energy
1
/floorarea

Waterheating
Population/occupied
dwellings
Waterheating
energy
2
/occupied
dwelling

Cooking
Population/occupied
dwellings
Cookingenergy
2
/
occupieddwellings

Lighting
FloorArea/population Lightingenergy/
floorarea

Appliances
Appliancesownership/
population
Appliancesenergy/
applianceownership
PassengerTransport

Car Passenger
kilometre
Shareofpassenger
kilometre
Energy/passenger
kilometre
Bus
Rail
Domesticair
FreightTransport

Truck Tonne
kilometre
Shareoftonnekilometre Energy/tonne
kilometre
Rail
Domesticshipping

DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|48
Sector Subsector Activity(A) Structure(S) Intensity(I)
Manufacturing
4

ISIC1516 Food,beverageand
tobacco
Valueadded Shareofvalueadded Energy/valueadded
ISIC2122 Paper,pulpand
printing

ISIC24 Chemicals
ISIC26 Nonmetallicminerals
ISIC27 Primarymetals
ISIC2832 Metalproductsand
equipment

ISIC1720,
25,3337
Othermanufacturing
Services

ISIC5099 Services Valueadded Shareofvalue added Energy/valueadded


OtherIndustries
3

ISIC15 AgricultureandFishing Valueadded Shareofvalue added Energy/valueadded


ISIC45 Construction
Notes:
1)Adjustedforclimatevariationsusingheatingdegreedays.
2)Adjustedforhouseholdoccupancy.
3)ThefollowingISICgroupsarenotincludedintheanalysis:1014Mining&Quarrying,23FuelProcessing,and4041Electricity,gas
andwatersupply.IndustriesincategoryOtherindustriesareanalysedonlytoaverylimitedextentbytheIEA.
4)BasedonISICrev.3.1.
By introducing the dimension of fuel mix and carbon intensity (or CO
2
intensity), the
decomposition of energy use can be extended to address changes in CO
2
emissions (G). In this
case,fuelmix(F)representschangesinfuelshares(includingelectricity)amongenduses.Carbon
intensity(C)referstotheCO
2
emissionsperunitofenergyused.
F
t
r,t
=
F
t
r.
F
t
r
C

r,t
=
6
t
r,
F
t
r,

The CO
2
emissions (G) in a sector can then be decomposed into the activity, structure, energy
intensity,fuelmixandcarbonintensityeffectsaccordingtothefollowingformula:
6
t
= A
t
_S
t
r
I
t
r
[F
t
r,
C
t
r,

eue|
_
r

This makes it possible to calculate the hypothetical CO
2
emissions as well as CO
2
savings. For
example,thefollowingtwoformulaspresentthecarbonintensityeffectandcorrespondingsavings.
6
t
C
=
A

jS

r
I

r
[F

r,
C
t
r,

[
r
6

CO
2
SAFIN6S
t
C
=
6
t
6
t
C
- 6
t

OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|49
FigureB.1.:BasicoverviewoffactorsinCO
2
decomposition

G=A[SI(FC)]

Regionalaggregatesforhypotheticalenergyusearecalculatedasthesumofhypotheticalenergy
usesacrossallcountriesinaparticularregion.Energysavingsforaregionarethencalculatedasa
differencebetweenthehypotheticalenergyuseandtheactualenergyuse.Thesameapproachis
usedforCO
2
emissions.
A number of different indexnumber techniques can be used to analyse factors affecting energy
use.TheIEAusestheLaspeyresindicesapproachwhichisrelativelysimpletointerpret.However,
theindicatorresultsareaffectedbythischoiceofapproach,andbytheselectionanddefinitionof
the activity, structure and intensity variables. In addition, it is important to keep in mind that
individual countries that have created their own indicators may have different results. Some of
thesecountrieshaveusedadifferentdecompositionmethodandchosendifferentvariables.
Sectoralcoverage
The analysis done by the IEA considers energy use in the manufacturing, residential, service,
passenger and freight transport sectors in the categories shown in Figure B.2. It does not
considerotherindustriesindetail,asdatafortheseactivitiesarescarce.
All energy data in the IEA energy indicators publications are expressed on a net calorific value
basis(usinglowerheatingvalues).DatadefinitionsarebasedonthemethodologyusedintheIEA
energystatisticsandbalances,althoughtherearesomeimportantdifferences.IntheIEAenergy
balances, coal transformation losses are included as energy transformation. The IEA indicator
approachallocatestheselossestotheprimarymetalssector(ISIC27)inwhichthesecondarycoal
products are consumed. With the energy balances method, petroleum products used as
feedstocksforindustrialchemicalsareincludedasnonenergyuseintheTFC.Theseproductsare
not included at all in the indicator approach. Similarly, the energy balances approach includes
energy use for refining in the transformation sector whereas the indicator approach considers
refining as part of ISIC 23 (manufacture of coke, refined petroleum products and nuclear fuels),
whichisexcludedfortheindicatorsanalysis.
The indicators analysis study also excludes some aspects of transportation such as natural gas
pipelines, and fuel use for private boats and military vehicles. Both approaches exclude
internationalmarinebunkersfromTFC.InternationalairtrafficisincludedintheIEAstatisticsbut
notintheindicatorapproach.
Furtherinformationonthescopeofindividualsectorsisprovidedbelow.
The manufacturing sector of industry produces finished goods or products for use by other
businesses,forsaletodomesticconsumersorforexport.
Sectors Fuels
Activity
Energy Services
Structure
Energy intensity Carbon intensity
Fuel Mix
DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|50
The residential sector includes those activities related to private dwellings. It covers all energy
using activities in apartments and houses, including space and water heating, cooking, lighting
andtheuseofappliances.
Theservicesectorincludesactivitiesrelatedtotrade,finance,realestate,publicadministration,
health,educationandcommercialservices.
Passenger transport includes the movement of people by road, rail, water and air. Passenger
road transport is further subdivided into cars and buses. International air travel is excluded due
toalackofconsistentandcomparabledataforIEAcountries.
Freighttransportincludesthemovementofgoodsbyroad,railandwater.Itexcludesairfreight
transportbecauseofalackofcomprehensiveandconsistentdataforthismode.
FigureB.2.Disaggregationofsectors,subsectorsandendusesinIEAenergyindicatorsapproach

Spaceheating
Waterheating
Cooking
Lighting
Appliances
Totalservices
Carsandlight
dutyvehicles
Mororcycles
Buses
Passengerrail
Passengerships
Domesticplanes
Trucks
Freightrail
Domesticshipping
Domesticair
freight
Food,beverages
andtobacco
Paper,pulp&
printing
Industrial
chemicals
Nonmetallic
minerals
Primarymetals
Metalproducts
andequipment
Other
Agriculture,
forestryand
fishing
Mining
Construction
Electricity,gas&
waterdistribution
Residential Services
Passenger
transport
Freighttransport
Manufacturing Otherindustry
Finalenergyconsumption
OECD/IEA2011 DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia
Page|51
AnnexC.References
IEA(InternationalEnergyAgency)(2004),CominginFromtheCold:ImprovingDistrictHeating
PolicyinTransitionEconomies,IEA/OECD,Paris,
www.iea.org/publications/free_new_Desc.asp?PUBS_ID=1469
IEA(2008),WorldwideTrendsinEnergyUseandEfficiency:KeyInsightsfromIEAIndicators
Analysis,IEA/OECD,Paris,www.iea.org/publications/free_new_Desc.asp?PUBS_ID=2026.
IEA(2009),EnergyTechnologyTransitionsforIndustry:StrategiesfortheNextIndustrial
Revolution,IEA/OECD,Paris,www.iea.org/publications/free_new_Desc.asp?PUBS_ID=2104.
IEA(2010),EnergyTechnologyPerspectives2010:Scenarios&Strategiesto2050,IEA/OECD,
Paris,www.iea.org/publications/free_new_Desc.asp?PUBS_ID=2100.
Rosstat(2010a),MainIndicatorsofTransportPerformancesinRussia,Rosstat,Moscow,
www.infostat.ru/eng/catalog.html?id=391&page=info.
Rosstat(2010b),TransportinRussia,Rosstat,Moscow.
WorldBank(2008),EnergyEfficiencyinRussia:UntappedReserves,WorldBank,Moscow.

DevelopmentofEnergyEfficiencyIndicatorsinRussia OECD/IEA2011
Page|52
AnnexD.Abbreviations,acronymsandunits
APEC AsiaPacificEconomicCooperation
bcm billionofcubicmetres
CO
2
carbondioxide
GDP Grossdomesticproduct
GHG Greenhousegas
IEA InternationalEnergyAgency
ISIC Internationalstandardindustrialclassification
LDV Lightdutyvehicles
MJ Megajoules(10
6
joules)
NIIAT ScientificandResearchInstituteofMotorTransport(Moscow)
PJ Petajoules(10
15
joules)
Pkm passengerkilometres
Rosstat FederalStateStatisticsService(Russia)
SUV Sportutilityvehicle
TFC Totalfinalenergyconsumption
TPES Totalprimaryenergysupply

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY


9 RUE DE LA FDRATION
75739 PARIS CEDEX 15
www.iea.org

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen