1

Presentation is not created using a Web 2.0 tool.

2
Presentation is created using a Web 2.0 tool but is not the best tool to convey the information.

3
Presentation is created using an appropriate Web 2.0 tool

Score 3

Less than 4 advantages were described for incorporating Web 2.0 tools within the classroom. Descriptions showed that the learner did not have an understanding of objective 3a.

4 advantages were described for incorporating Web 2.0 tools within the classroom. Descriptions showed that the learner had an understanding of objective 3a.

5 advantages were described for incorporating Web 2.0 tools within the classroom. Descriptions showed that the learner had a clear understanding of objective 3a.

Did not identify ways Web 2.0 tools enhance differentiation in the classroom. Explanations showed that the learner did not have an understanding of objective 3b.

Identify ways Web 2.0 tools enhance differentiation in the classroom. Explanations showed that the learner had an understanding of objective 3b.

Identify ways Web 2.0 tools enhance differentiation in the classroom. Explanations showed that the learner had a clear understanding of objective 3b.

Describes less than 7 tools. 2 or more descriptions do not include tools functions or classroom use. Descriptions showed that the learner did not have an understanding of objective 3c.

Describes 7-8 tools. 1 description does not include tools functions or classroom use. Descriptions showed that the learner had an understanding of objective 3c.

Describes 9 tools All descriptions include tools functions or classroom use. Descriptions showed that the learner had a clear understanding of objective 3c.

Presentation is not created online.

N/A

Presentation is created online. Presentation is shared online.

Presentation was emailed to instructor. Fewer than 80% of the buttons work correctly. All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation. Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material. Most (99-85%) buttons and links work correctly. All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation. Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read.

Link to presentation was sent to instructor. All buttons and links work correctly. Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation.

Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.

Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format.

Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format.

Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format.