Sie sind auf Seite 1von 10

MEMORANADUM FOR THE RECORD

Event: Tom Kinton

Type: Interview

Special Access Issued None )

Prepared by: Lisa SuUi^an'and Bill Johnstone

Team: 7

Date: November 6, 2003

Participants (non Commission): Tom Kinton, MASSPORT; Chris Moore, Counsel for
MASSPORT; John Altai, Counsel for MASSPORT

Participants (Commission): Bill Johnstone, John Raidt, Lisa Sullivan

Location: Goodwin Proctor LLP, 1 Exchange Place, Boston, MA

Background

[U] Kinton is Director of Aviation for Massport, which includes responsibility for Logan
^Aipport, Hanscom Field and Worchester Regional Airport. He has been with Massport
for 27 1A years, all in aviation. He served as the building control supervisor, manager of
building maintenance, director of airport facilities, director of operations (1988 - 1992),
and director of aviation (1993 - present). He was Acting CEO for the authority from
October 2001 till April 2002. He stepped up to this last post "with a lot of pride" in a
time of need; "It was trying times."

[U] Massport is a multipurpose port authority covering bridges, maritime facilities


(including containerized cargo and cruise ships), several airports, and a development
department that handles properties around the waterfront. Those are the 4 primary
operating departments managed by the authority (including legal, labor relations, and
human resources staff), with a chief executive officer who reports to the Board of
Directors. The Governor appoints the Board to 7 year terms (staggered). Kinton's
immediate supervisor is the CEO.

Security at Logan Airport Prior to 9/11

[U] Kinton reported that Logan met the federal standards (FAR, certification
requirements) by which it was governed, and in many ways, exceeded those
requirements, which Kinton saw as a minimum standard. He cited as examples of
Logan's leadership its requirement for finger-printing for those seeking access badges
prior to the federal requirement for the same, its hiring of more canine teams (for

.j/MV
^^
V/
detection of explosives) than required), and its development of a "laser" team of 5 or 6
state police officers with a specific assignment to check airport security (via ID checks,
SIDA challenges, door checks, etc.). This last was in place by 1999. Finally, though
more a safety than security matter, the fire department was required to have a volume of
foam and water triple the federal standard and to able to get to the end of the furthest
runway in 2 minutes or less.

[U] Kinton and the other airport officials wanted to be leaders in the field, and to go over
and beyond the minimum required by the federal government. He felt like he always had
good support from the Executive Director and the Board to do so.

[U] Kinton reported he got along very well with Federal officials, including the Civil
.viation Security Field Office (CASFO) at Logan, and the Federal Security Manager
'(FSM) at Logan. He was aware that there were some "issues" between certain CASFO
officials and the FSM.

Security Threats

Mr. Kinton reported receiving "broad based" threat reports, with nothing specific to
Logan, or to a particular methodology or group. They developed "Go Teams" to learn
lessons from specific safety and security incidents around the world, with a mandate to
"picture the accident at Logan" and come back with recommendations. He indicated they
sent a team to France after the Air France hijacking. Joe Lawless went on that trip to
learn as much as he could about storming the aircraft. For instance the stairs used to get
in the plane must be adjusted depending on number of people in the plane and how much
fuel it has on board.

[U] Kinton indicated that the State Police, the FAA and sometimes the FBI were the main
sources of intelligence. The Director of Public Safety for the airport (Joe Lawless prior to
9/11) oversaw the state police at the airport and anything that came to him from that
source would be communicated to Kinton. FAA threat reporting came from various
intelligence sources, including the FBI but there were times the FBI approached Logan
directly. When something significant happened with respect to security, Kinton felt that
he wouldn't have to wait for a staff meeting or anything like that because Lawless
notified him right away when it was something he needed to know.

[U] With respect to information on the terrorist threat, the FBI approached Massport
about members of Hamas and Hezbollah working at Logan for Massport and an airline,
as well as about a cab driver at the Airport associated with the Cole bombing.

Kinton recalled that the FAA (in the form of the CASFO or FSM) came to him five
or less times pre-9-1 1 and provided him with general threat information he had to read in
their presence and sign for. He assumed Joe Lawless was given the same information.
None of it concerned specific threats, and it was mostly about overseas threats. He
recalled references to al Qaeda, but not to the possibility of suicide hijackings or aircraft
as weapons. He had no recollection of the 2000-2001 Pat McDonnell CD-ROM
presentation on the terrorist threat to civil aviation. The FAA presentations didn't require
Massport to take any actions, but Kinton was told not to share the information. He was
concerned because "information sharing is absolutely critical to the people on the front
line in the war on terrorism."

Security Vulnerabilities

[U] Kinton received reports on security vulnerabilities at Logan from Joe Lawless (and
through him, the State Police), the CASFO, the FSM, occasional Joint Vulnerability
Assessments by the FBI and FAA, and possibly an assessment from the military some
time ago. The main issues generally involved insuring thatf

/9/11 Classified
Checkpoint screening / Information

[U] Kinton was frustrated by headline reports in the Boston Globe in the late 1990s, /
based on FOIA filings for FAA checkpoint screening test results. He felt it was /
"ludicrous that we undress ourselves in the public arena" with respect to security /
vulnerabilities. He had to go before the Boston media and explain that Massport was/not
in control of checkpoint security.

[U] After the Globe stories, Mr. Kinton recalled discussions with Joe Lawless about/
Lawless's plan to test checkpoints. However, according to Kinton, the plan "never got
off the ground." While Kinton thought it was worthy of further discussion, there were
concerns, especially about Massport's lack of authority with respect to the checkpoints.
The division of responsibilities was long-established and there were good reasons,/ For
example, the airlines didn't need to know how much foam and water Massport ha£
arranged with the fire department to bring to the middle of the runway. i tifiN-

[U] Kinton indicated that he wasn't holding the conversations with the FAA-erb"out rolling
out such a program of testing. That was being done by Lawless. Before the pro/gram
could proceed any further it needed the approval of Massport CEO B^kingham as well
V as the Board. Prior to that, the Lawless plan was raised at a-feAN€!O meeting o/f
stakeholders at which both the air carriers and the FAA expressed objections. ;

[U] Shortly after the LANCO meeting, the Lawless testing plan was discussed at a
Massport senior staff meeting, which Kinton missed. He was represented by fed Freijj'fi
who reported to him that the plan was not approved. Kinton understood that/the program
was not necessarily rejected but that it was clear that the details needed to be/worked out
(including liability issues) before it could be seriously considered for implerhentation.
Furthermore, the testing would have been forj [and not about
. / the kind of weapons used on 9/11. Apparently, there were no minutes taken i»/

[U] Kinton recalled that Logan was to be involved with the FAA in a joint testing pilot
program, but he didn't remember any MOU on the subject.
Security Resource Issues

[U] Mr. Kinton thought that security camera coverage at the airport was important.
Camera installation was included in many of the new construction projects at Logan. The
newest garage had surveillance cameras installed as did the new international gateway.
Kinton did not recall any details about surveillance camera proposals not being funded,
nor a study of the need for such equipment. After 9-1 1 Massport "rushed out" and did
the checkpoints and the cameras have subsequently been used effectively to decide
whether or not to dump a concourse or go looking for a specific individual who has
breached security. In Kinton's view, the cameras can also act as a deterrent. He did
recall a discussion of a CCTV program throughout the airport. This was a larger
program, related to access issues, but it was not funded pre-9/1 1 .

[U] Kinton stated that as of 9/1 1, Logan was in the midst of a $4 billion dollar rebuilding
of the airport. He "absolutely" felt the airport got what it needed with respect to
security, such as more cruisers, K9 teams, and a weapons of mass destruction training
program. There was never a period when security received inadequate support. Safety
and security was always at the top of the mission list.

[U] The airport had a five-year rolling capital improvements budget for major
infrastructure, including such items as bomb trailers and robots, dive team truck, snow
plows, and CCTV. There was also an annual operating budget, which funded security
*~\s like the Laser team, and travel for the Go Team. Lawless and the other senior
( i' airport staff were given an annual performance appraisal which listed "5 or 6" priority
v goals and objectives for that year.

CTI Audits

[U] Kinton cited the CTI security audit as a good example of something in the budget
which was funded out of Lawless' department. Kinton didn't recall whose idea it was,
but thought it was a smart thing to do. The purpose of the audit was to do a security risk
analysis at all Massport properties and to determine what could be done to improve
security. He recalled that pre-9/1 1 Lawless shared with him a memo he sent to
Buckingham on security threats. Kinton also saw the final CTI report on portals, which
he thought thorough and professional, prior to 9/11, but he didn't have any interaction
with the larger CTI audit at that time.

[U] Kinton reported that he saw a "first draft" of the larger CTI security audit whHe'he
was serving as Acting CEO after 9/11. He indicated that it was customary for sjach
reports to go through multiple drafts before the final version was produced. When he saw
the draft, he was "outraged." While approximately 52 pages (which constituted the bulk
of the report) were done professionally, neither he, nor his deputy (Fr&iKy nor CEO
Buckingham had been interviewed or asked to participate and the editorializing by a
"junior" CTI person was inflammatory and untrue. (Kinton never received an
explanation as to why he wasn't interviewed.) In consequence, Kinton took his
complaint to the president of CTI, stating "you can write what ever you want to write but
you better talk to the right people." Subsequent drafts were produced and the final report
was much more professional, in Kinton's view.

[U] A report by Israeli security expert Rafi Ron was done in conjunction with the CTI
audit. That report was designed to add the international angle (post-9-11) to cover all
perspectives. The two reports are used as today as guides for Massport security efforts.
After media accounts critical of the final CTI report appeared, Len Limmer, who had
worked previously with Rafi Ron, was brought in to provide an independent summary of
the CTI audit and the process by which it was produced. Limmer produced a final three
page summation to satisfy the Board's concerns about what the press was saying.

[U] Kinton believes that the DawleSSTSemo to BucKngham (on the security threat to
A <^^ Logan) was the basis for conttactingwrtrTCTI fui Ihesecurity audit and the results of that
/&C V o \t and the Rafi Ron report were the roadmap for the later improvements. Kinton also
v\ felt that the Carter Commission report recommendations were useful.

The Day of September 11, 2001

[U] On 9/11, Kinton reported that he was in Montreal; at the Airport Conference
International conference with most of his counterparts from the major airports. He was/in
the exhibit hall that morning and at around 8:20 AM he spoke with his deputy, Ed Fre^hi,
who reported that everything was okay in Boston. While eating breakfast shortly
thereafter he heard someone say that a small aircraft had hit a building in New York City
He had Sam Slimor of his staff call Logan Operations, and Kinton was told that "they
want you right away." The report from Logan Tower was that "all hell's breaking loose;"
a plane had hit the World trade Center and American Flight 11 from Logan had been
hijacked, but it was not clear whether it was the plane which hit the WTC.

[U] Kintofbihen called the office and Lawless was already there in the conference room
with Frenhi a(nd they were telling him what was going on. They were planning on calling
the FAA"and Air Traffic Control to get any more available information. He didn't recall
being told about any communications with American Airlines. He told them he would
return right away. He went back to his hotel, where he saw the CNN footage of the
second plane hitting the WTC. He was back on the phone to his office and his secretary
told him Logan was being closed down, so he rented a car to return. He spoke with
Lawless who confirmed that Flight #11 had hit the WTC, and Kinton then directed
Lawless to open the Emergency Operations Center. Subsequently, he got confirmation
on UAL #175 and he heard reports on the radio about an aircraft heading toward the
Capitol, the Pentagon being in flames, and that there may have been a third plane
hijacked out of Boston. His feeling was "we are under attack."

[U] He was met by a State trooper at the Vermont border and got an escort to Concord,
New Hampshire from where he flew back to Boston. Shortly after crossing into
Vermont, he heard reports that the suspect Delta fight had landed safely in Cleveland and
that the WTC had collapsed. He arrived in Boston^t"l-$45 PM and went immediately to
the Emergency Operations Center. Lawless and FrWihi/gave him a briefing which
included information on the discovery of Atta's rental car at Logan, and on the call from
the American flight to a Supervisor in Boston which had reported that box cutters had
been used, that a passenger and crew members had been stabbed, and that the aircraft was
flying too low and too fast over New York City. The call apparently had continued right
up to the point of impact. He also learned that an American crew member had made calls
to Dallas, and that calls were made from UAL #175 to Chicago.

[U] Kinton learned that flight manuals and the Koran were found in Atta's bag that didn't
make his flight from Portland. With regard to the Atta car, Kinton was informed that a
passenger that left Logan in the morning had called back to report a suspicious incident in
the parking lot. This report led the airport authorities to the discovery of the car. Later in
the day he saw the manifest for AAL #11 and the names of the hijackers "jumped out at
you" in hindsight, especially thejAdvantage member who was in First Class.

The Hijackings and Terrorism

[U] With what he learned upon his return to Boston, Kinton could see that the day's
events had redefined hijacking forever. He believes that the hijackings were the result of
a systems, rather than security, failure. He cited the systematic efforts of the hijackers
(how they infiltrated the system, none of them had jobs, they were frequent travelers,
some were in flight schools, some had traveled to Afghanistan) and the fact that some
were even chosen (by the CAPPS system) as selectees. He concluded, "They beat us in
many ways."

[U] During the summer of 2001, Kinton didn't have a feeling of a heightened threat.
There was nothing that alarmed him or made him more vigilant. He was not aware of the
1998 action which reduced the consequences (to checked bag search only) for "selection"
by CAPPS or its predecessor, but knowing the situation before 9-11, it wouldn't have "hit
him." He recalled that before 9/11, it was all about keeping bombs off airplanes, and
many were still debating Lockerbie. That was why Boston moved so quickly on the
checked bags screening.

[U] Kinton stated that he was at ground zero of the investigation of the hijackings and he
sees it differently than some others. He believes that terrorism is something that is very
hard to defend against. He cited the fact that Israel is recognized as the best in counter-
terrorism, and he questioned if there is an investigation every time a bomb goes off over
there. In Kinton's view, we have got to get over pointing the finger of blame and come
together to deal with the problem, because terrorism will be with us for the foreseeable
future.

The Response to 9/11

[U] Mr. Kinton indicated that the Emergency Operations Center had practiced many
times for crashes and accidents. There were over 60 positions staffed in it and he felt the
operation was second to none. It remained in operation for several weeks after 9/11.
[U] Dave Mackey (a Massport counsel) suggested the idea of searching every grounded
airplane on 9/11, and Kinton agreed. Using the State Police, they started with searches of
wide-bodied aircraft that night and did it again and went through lockers, rest rooms and
public areas. After the initial FAA Security Directive, they towed over 3000 cars. The
FBI was involved at this point.

[U] Kinton indicated that Massport received no directions from the FAA, FBI or anyone
else about screening de-planing passengers or examining flight manifests. He recalled no
evidence of further plots. Other than the discovery of the Atta car, he was not aware of
other instances of surveillance of Logan by the hijackers.

[U] Kinton recalled the September 19,2001 charter flight to Logan to pick up Bin Laden
family members. There was much confusion at that time with respect to air space and he
wanted to make sure everyone that needed to know was involved (State Department, FBI
and the State police). The FBI advised him to let the flight come. He remembered that
the flight came out of Los Angeles going on to Orlando, Dallas, Boston, Gander and
London, that a police officer got off in Boston, and that the FBI and Customs were there
to meet the airplane. He saw the manifest, and will provide a copy to the Commission. V
- . \] Kinton stated that th

Canada in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, but nothing related to the Bin Laden family.
He felt they needed to watch the Canadian border carefully because there had been many
overseas flights grounded in Canada and he wanted to make sure individuals coming into
the U.S. from those flights were on the approved list to come in here.

Recommendations

1) [U] Based on the Israeli experience, Kinton believes we need a layered approach
for security, and not to rely on a single line of defense, such as checkpoint
screening. Furthermore, the layers need to have some random elements in order
to defeat surveillance. Kinton citedj 9/n classified information |
which is currently done at Logan as an essential layer which should be done
nationally: "we need to look at eyes, not just screens."

2) [U] Kinton supports "hardening" of new facilities (minimizing flying glass,


resisting building collapse, etc.) to minimize the impact of future terrorist strikes.

3) fSStfj Kinton advocates deployment of better technology, f

9/11 Classified Information


waiting for CAPPS II. Kinton believes that CAPPS II is headed in the right
direction but he fears it will never be deployed because it is trying to do too much
(criminals as well as terrorists).

4) flS-St] Kinton supports expeditious deployment by all airports Q J


He noted that Logan met the original deadline, even as other airports were
successfully petitioning Congress for a delay, because they didn't stop to make i
sure who was going to pay for it, and they got a waiver to allow Massport itself tol
pay the bill.) \n believes the country n

needs to catch up to the need. If there is intelligence that suggests the need to I
remove cargo on passenger planes (which the airlines depend on for revenue), he j
thinks the government should consider subsidizing the airlines for the lost revenue^
and putting it on a cargo-only carrier. /9/11 Classified
Information
Current Security Concerns

[U] Kinton cited the following as his current chief concerns with respect to transportation
security:

1) Cargo
2) Explosives in the aircraft cabin
3) MANPADS - very hard to defend against
4) Suicide bomber
5) Containers - too late to scrutinize when they have arrived in the,IIS.; the
screening needs to be moved to foreign ports of origin
6) I I
7) Rail - especially as a means of carrying containers
8) General Aviation

[U] Kinton urged that the country not let its guard down. Once we put something in
place we need it to get stronger over time rather than weaker because experience has
shown that the terrorists can show great patience.

Security Consortia

[U] Pre-9/11, Kinton believed that the model Massport adopted (LAMPCO) was the right
vehicle at that time rather than the model suggested by the Gore Commission. Today,
this has evolved where they "fill the room everyday, 7 days a week" with 20-25 people
talking security. The Federal Security Director (FSD) and Kinton chair it. The airlines
are in the room, along with Customs, Air Marshals, state police, and senior Massport
management. He believes this approach results in problems getting solved, and he
recommends it to other airports.
,./ 9/11 Classified
'Information

TSA

With regard to TSA operations, Kinton cited the experience with box cutters, j i
During a recent morning rush hour at Logan, TSA screeners at the American Airlines I j
checkpoint found 4 within an hour. TSA takes the implement away from them and let$ \m go. He asked TSA abo

videotapes (using BPR techniques) to insure that the persons weren't "suspicious lookirig.

[U] Kinton recalled recent TSA Information Circulars abouC


IJjut the Circulars contained no guidance as \o what specific steps sho

difficult to respond. He believes that Security Directives and Information Circulars need
not only be warnings but also recommendations, giving guidance on what TSA intends \r the airport .to do. As

should be .subject to random selection for extra scrutiny (for example, every fifth! I

[U] Prior to 9-11, on Security Directives there was a "Dissemination Guidance" as to


whether the information "shall" or "may" be given to the airport directors, and the result
was sometimes important information was withheld. After 9/11, Kinton started seeing
"everything" after 9-11. However, he worries that TSA is becoming more secretive as it
evolves. Since the checkpoints have been federalized, TSA does not share information
on checkpoint screening performance and the Information Circulars seem to have less
information than before.

[U] Kinton stated that originally TSA put in place a "scientifically determined" screener
workforce level, but have since (under Congressional pressure) arbitrarily reduced that
workforce. However, he is not in favor of privatization of screening. Smaller airports
could be contracted out, under federal oversight.

General Aviation (GA)

[U] There is a lot of General Aviation at Hanscom and also at Logan. Massport is
requiring background checks and issuing ID's to pilots based out of Hanscom, in spite of
initial push-back from industry. They are taking the Cat X (large passenger airport)
approach to GA and are screening GA passengers out of Logan. Radio talk show host
Don Imus has mentioned it on his show. They screened a Saudi Flight with a sports team:
"unless we get a letter from the State Department we are going to do it." Kinton
supported the ideas of having a security coordinator at each GA facility, and of requiring
a special ID for GA pilots.

Customer Service (CS) Initiative

[U] Kinton indicated that the CS Initiative had nothing to do with security. It was aimed
at opening up more screening lanes; it was a problem of lack of staffing. He stated that
Massport didn't invent the standards, but used the ones set by the airlines themselves. He
believes TS A itself is providing inadequate staffing levels for screening at present, and as
the economy improves and flight levels increase, passengers will once again become very
frustrated by the delays.

10

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen