Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
) = f in
,
(A
(x)u
) n = h
on S
, (1)
u
= 0 on ,
where
from
, f and h
(R
N
)]
N
2
: (A(x), ) [[
2
,
[A(x)[ [[ R
N
, p.p x
_
which is dened for all real numbers and .
When h
L
2
(S
= and A
(x) = A(
x
)
with A M(, ; ), and by C. Conca and P. Donato [5] for A = I and r
.
Using the concept of H
0
-convergence introduced by M. Briane et al. [2], P.
Donato and M. El Hajji [6] showed convergence of solutions in not-necessarily
, given by
h
,
H
1
(), H
1
0
()
= h
,
H
1/2
(S), H
1/2
(S)
, H
1
0
(). (2)
This method allows the study the asymptotic behavior of solutions to (1) for
h
L
2
(S
) with r
>
N/N2
(see [6]), and for perforated domains with
double periodicity with h
H
1/2
(S
) and r
/ 0 as 0 (see T. Levy
[8]).
In this article, we study the perforated domains with r
<
N/N2
, and
perforated domains such that r
S
of the form k
1
+r
S with k Z
N
. Let k
l
= (k
1
l
1
, .., k
N
l
N
) represent the holes
in R
N
.
We assume that the holes (r
is
the set of the holes enclosed in , it follows that there exists a nite set / Z
N
such that
S
=
_
kK
r
(k
l
+S).
We set
= S
, (3)
and denote by
. Let V
=
_
v H
1
(
), v
|
= 0
_
equipped with the H
1
-norm. Let A(y) = (a
ij
(y))
ij
be a matrix such that
A
_
L
_
R
N
__
N
2
,
A is Y-periodic, and there there exist > 0 such that
N
i,j=1
a
ij
(y)
i
j
[[
2
, a.e. y in R
N
, R
N
. (4)
We note that for every > 0,
A
(x) = A(
x
) a.e. x in R
N
. (5)
EJDE2000/15 Mohamed El Hajji 3
In this paper, we study the system
div(A
) = 0 in
,
(A
).n = h
on S
, (6)
u
= 0, on ,
where
is given by (3), A
is given by
h
(x) = h(
x
r
), (7)
where h L
2
(S) is Y -periodic function. Set
I
h
=
1
[Y [
_
S
hd . (8)
We examine the case where r
<
N/(N2)
with I
h
,= 0, and the case where
lim
o
r
/ = 0 with I
h
= 0. The following result describes the asymptotic
behavior of the solution to (6) in the two cases.
Theorem 1 Let u
N/(N2)
= 0 if N > 2,
lim
0
2
(ln(/r
))
1
= 0 if N = 2,
(9)
or
I
h
= 0 and lim
0
r
= 0 . (10)
Then, for every > 0, there exists an extension operator P
dened from V
to
H
1
0
() satisfying
P
L
_
V
, H
1
0
()
_
, (11)
(P
v)
|
= v v V
, (12)
|(P
v)|
(L
2
())
N C |v|
(L
2
())
N , v V
. (13)
such that
(
r
)
N/2
P
u weakly in H
1
0
(), for N > 2
and
P
[(
r
)
1/2
(log
r
)
1/2
u
] u weakly in H
1
0
(), for N = 2,
where u is the solution of the problem
div(A
0
.u) = 0 in ,
u = 0 on ,
4 Diusion equation for composite materials EJDE2000/15
and the matrix A
0
= (a
0
ij
)
ij
has entries
a
0
ij
=
1
[Y [
_
Y
(a
ji
N
k=1
a
ki
j
y
k
dy), (14)
and
j
is a Y -periodic function that satises
div(A
t
(y
j
j
)) = 0 in Y (15)
Remark. One can replace the rst equation of system (6) by
div(A
) = f
in
,
with
(
r
)
N/2
f
f weakly in L
2
() if N > 2,
(
r
)
1
(ln(/r
))
1/2
f
f weakly in L
2
() if N = 2.
Then u will be the solution of
div(A
0
.u) = f in ,
u = 0 on .
This approach has been used in [5] for the case A = I, in [3] when A = I and
r
>
N/(N2)
using the H
0
-convergence
and some arguments given by S. Kaizu in [7].
3 Proof of the main result
Observe rst that S
satisfying (14).
On the other hand, the matrix A
0
can be dened by
A
0
= /
Y
(
t
Aw
) =
1
[Y [
_
Y
t
Aw dy, R
N
,
where for every R, w
) = 0 in Y, (16)
with w
y Y -periodic.
For x R
N
, let
w
(x) = w
(
x
). (17)
To simplify notation, let
=
_
(r
/)
N/2
if N > 2,
(r
/)
1
(ln(/r
))
1/2
if N = 2.
(18)
EJDE2000/15 Mohamed El Hajji 5
Taking u
|(
)|
L
2
()
c.
Hence, from (13), up to a subsequence,
P
) u weakly in H
1
0
(). (19)
Set now
= A
[P
is bounded in L
2
(), and so up to a subsequence
weakly in L
2
(). (20)
Case where (9) is satised. Let D(). Then from the variational
formulation of (6), one has
_
.dx =
_
S
h
d . (21)
If N() denotes the number of the holes included in , one has then
[
_
S
h
d[ ||
L
()
kK
_
(r(S+k))
[h(
x
r
)[ d(x)
c
N()r
N1
_
S
[h[ d (22)
c
r
N1
N
[S[
1/2
|h|
L
2
(S)
.
From (18), one can write
r
N1
N
=
_
(
r
N2
N
)
1/2
if N > 2,
[
2
(ln(/r
))
1
]
1/2
if N = 2,
and so in virtue of (9),
lim
0
N1
N
= 0, (23)
hence
lim
0
_
S
h
d = 0 .
On the other hand, it is easy to show that
1 strongly in L
p
() p [1, [,
hence _
.dx
_
.dx. (24)
6 Diusion equation for composite materials EJDE2000/15
One can deduce that, as 0 in (21),
_
dx = 0, D().
Consequently
div = 0 in . (25)
It remains to identify the function . Let w
x weakly in H
1
(), and so L
p
() strong p < 2
where 1/2
as a test
function in the variational formulation of (6), one has
_
(w
) dx =
_
S
h
dx. (26)
To pass to the limit as 0 in (26), we set
_
(w
) dx = J
1
+J
2
, (27)
where
J
1
=
_
.w
dx and J
2
=
_
.dx.
Using the results given by G. Stampacchia in [9] (see also [1]), one can deduce
that w
(Y ), so
x strongly in L
2
(). (28)
This with convergence (20), gives
J
1
=
_
dx
_
xdx as 0 . (29)
Now, we may write
J
2
=
_
dx
_
S
dx. (30)
One the one hand,
_
dx =
_
t
A
[P
)] dx
_
t
A
[(
] dx
=
_
t
A
[(
] dx
EJDE2000/15 Mohamed El Hajji 7
because, from the denition of w
,
_
t
A
[P
)] dx = 0 .
From the denition of A
0
,
t
A
A
0
weakly in L
2
(). From (19), up to
a subsequence,
P
) u strongly inL
2
(),
which implies
_
t
A
) dx
_
A
0
udx.
Hence
_
dx
_
A
0
u dx. (31)
On the other hand,
[
_
S
dx[ c|
|
L
2
()
|w
|
L
2
(S)
. (32)
Since |
|
L
2
()
is bounded,
[
_
S
dx[ c|w
|
L
2
(S)
. (33)
Note that
|w
|
2
L
2
(S)
=
_
S
[(w
)(x)[
2
dx
=
kK
_
r(S+k)
[(w
)(x)[
2
dx
=
kK
_
r(S+k)
[(
y
w
)(
x
)[
2
dy
= N()
N
_
r
S
[(
y
w
)(y)[
2
dy
c
_
r
S
[w
[
2
dy .
Since r
/ 0 and w
H
1
(Y ), it follows that
_
rS/
[w
[
2
dy 0 .
Using (33), one has
_
S
dx 0 as 0.
8 Diusion equation for composite materials EJDE2000/15
This, with (30) and convergence (31) imply that
J
2
_
A
0
u dx. (34)
Next we pass to the limit in the right hand of (26). With the same argument
as in (22),
[
_
S
h
d[ c
N()r
N1
_
S
[hw
[ d
c
r
N1
N
|w
|
L
2
(S)
[S[
1/2
|h|
L
2
(S)
.
Since we have shown that
lim
0
r
N1
N
= 0,
from (9) one deduces that
_
S
h
d 0.
Finally, by passing to the limit as 0 in (26), and using (32) and (34) one
obtains
_
xdx
_
A
0
u dx = 0,
hence, from (25) it follows that
_
dx =
_
A
0
udx D(), R
N
,
i.e., = A
0
u.
Case where (10) is satised. Let D(). Then from the variational
formulation of (6),
_
.dx =
_
S
h
d. (35)
The arguments used the proof of (24) can be applied here to obtain
_
.dx
_
.dx.
To pass to the limit in the right-hand side of (35), we introduce N as the
solution to
div N = 0 in S,
N.n = h on S .
EJDE2000/15 Mohamed El Hajji 9
The existence of N is assured by the hypothesis I
h
= 0. Set N
(x) = N(
x k
r
),
for x in (Y r
S)
k
. Then
_
S
h
d =
_
S
.N
dx,
hence
[
_
S
h
d[
||
L
2
(S)
|N
|
L
2
(S)
.
Note that |N
|
L
2
(S)
c(
r
)
N/2
|N|
L
2
(S)
, so
[
_
S
h
d[ c
(
r
)
N/2
||
L
1
(S)
. (36)
Since
(
r
)
N/2
=
_
1 if N > 2
(ln(/r
))
1/2
if N = 2,
it follows from (36), when N = 2, that
lim
0
[
_
S
h
d[ = 0 .
For N > 2, one has
[
_
S
h
d[ c||
L
2
(S)
.
Since
1 strongly in L
p
(), for all p [1, [ and D(), one deduces
that
_
(1
)[[
2
dx 0 .
Hence, by passing to the limit as 0 in (35), one obtains
_
.dx = 0 ,
then div = 0 in .
Let w
.(w
) dx =
_
S
h
d .
From (27), (29) and (34), one has
_
.(w
) dx
_
x.dx
_
A
0
.u dx. (37)
10 Diusion equation for composite materials EJDE2000/15
Now we show that
[
_
S
h
d[ 0. (38)
One has
[
_
S
h
d[
=
[
_
S
(w
).N
dx[
[
_
S
.w
.N
d[ +
[
_
S
.w
.N
d[
|N
|
L
2
(S)
|w
|
L
2
(S)
+
|N
|
L
2
(S)
|w
|
L
2
(S)
c
(
r
)
N/2
_
|w
|
L
2
(S)
+|w
|
L
2
(S)
_
c
(
r
)
N/2
_
||
L
()
|w
|
L
2
(S)
+||
L
()
|w
|
L
2
(S)
_
.
c
(
r
)
N/2
_
|w
|
L
2
(S)
+|w
|
L
2
(S)
_
.
Note that
|w
|
2
L
2
(S)
=
_
S
[w
[
2
dx =
kK
_
r(S+k)
[w
[
2
dx
N()
N
_
r
S
[w
[
2
dx c
_
r
S
[w
[
2
dx.
Since w
H
1
(S) and r
/ 0,
lim
0
_
r
S
[w
[
2
dx = 0 .
Hence |w
|
L
2
(S)
0. On the other hand, one has |w
|
L
2
(S)
c. Finally,
as
lim
0
(
r
)
N/2
= 0 ,
one deduces (38). This and (37) completes the proof, using the same arguments
as in the previous case.
Acknowledgments The author would like to thank Professor Patrizia Do-
nato for her help on this work.
References
[1] Brezis H. Analyse fonctionnelle, theorie et applications. Masson, 1992.
EJDE2000/15 Mohamed El Hajji 11
[2] Briane M., A. Damlamian & Donato P. H-convergence in perforated
domains, volume 13. Nonlinear partial Dierential Equations & Their Ap-
plications, Coll`ege de France seminar, H. Brezis & J.-L. Lions eds., Long-
man, New York, ` a paraitre.
[3] Cioranescu D.& Donato P. Homogeneisation du probl`eme de Neumann
non homog`ene dans des ouverts perfores. Asymptotic Analysis, 1:115138,
1988.
[4] Cioranescu D. & Saint Jean Paulin J. Homogenization in open sets
with holes. Journal of Mathematical Analysis & Applications, 71:590607,
1979.
[5] Conca C. & Donato P. Non-homogeneous Neumann problems in
domains with small holes. Modelisation Mathematiques et Analyse
Numerique, 4(22):561608, 1988.
[6] Donato P. & El Hajji M. An application of the H
0
-convergence to
some nonhomogeneous Neumann problems. GAKUTO International Series,
Math. Sc. and Appl., Gakkotosho, Tokyo, Japan, 9:137156, 1997.
[7] Kaizu S. The Poisson equation with nonautonomous semilinear doundary
conditions in domains with many tiny holes. Japan. Soc. for Industr. &
Appl. Math., 22:12221245, 1991.
[8] Levy T. Filtration in a porous ssured rock: inuence of the ssures
connexity. Eur. J. Mech, B/Fluids, 4(9):309327, 1990.
[9] Stampacchia G. Equations elliptiques du second ordre ` a coecients dis-
continues. Presses Univ.Montreal, 1966.
[10] Tartar L. Cours Peccot. Coll`ege de France, 1977.
Mohamed El Hajji
Universite de Rouen, UFR des Sciences
UPRES-A 60 85 (Labo de Math.)
76821 Mont Saint Aignan, France
e-mail: Mohamed.Elhajji@univ-rouen.fr