378 views

Uploaded by Kique151

This lab from physics 2 is based on collision study, energy and momentum

- Types of Collisions
- Forces and Motion_example Lab Report
- TEST IN ADV
- Exp. 6, Theory Rigid Body Equilibrium
- Collisions
- Conservation of Energy Lab Report
- Free Fall Experiment Discussion
- Projectile Motion Experiment 1
- Conservation of Momentum Lab Xp
- lab report about the Conservation of Mechanical Energy
- Momentum, Energy, And Collisions
- Air Track Collisions
- Conservation of Linear Momentum Lab Report
- Projectile Motion
- Collision lab
- 6.7. Impuls
- MOMENTUM_ETEMS.ppt
- Momentum
- Collision Lab
- Ideal Gas Law Derivation

You are on page 1of 12

Physics 151

Lab 11

4/20/12

Purpose: To examine the conservation/ loss of momentum and energy in inelastic and elastic collisions. Theory: This lab observes one dimensional collision of two objects; two types of collisions are possible: Elastic collision Characterized by the objects involved deflecting off of each other, momentum and kinetic energy is conserved. Inelastic collision Characterized by the objects involved adhering with one another, kinetic energy is not conserved; momentum is conserved. The apparatus used in the lab has the properties of a conservative system, that is, there are no net external forces - such as friction- acting on the objects. In a conservative system, momentum is conserved throughout a collision, regardless of whether it is elastic or inelastic; theoretically, the momentum of the whole system before the collision is equal to the momentum after the collision. This is represented by equation is the symbol for momentum, which is

defined as the product of an objects mass (m) and its velocity (v). Momentum for an object is given by Note that velocity is a vector, mass is scalar; therefore momentum is

actually a vector product. This means that an object can have negative momentum, such as when an object retraces its path as the result of a collision. When calculating the total mass of a system, all masses must be accounted for. For example:

http://www.s-cool.co.uk/category/subjects/a-level/physics/momentum-and-impulse

In a collision, momentum is exchanged between two or more bodies. The law of conservation of momentum states that the sum of each body's momentum before a collision equals the sum of each body's momentum after a collision, and/or after a collision, the momentum lost by one object equals the momentum gained by another. An elastic collision conserves kinetic energy as well as momentum. With two objects colliding, such as observed in the lab, the total kinetic energy is given by

With an inelastic collision two objects observed - the two bodies will combine and move at the same velocity as one unit.

Procedure:

SI units are used in this lab, mass is in kilograms, velocity is m/s, momentum is in kg(m/s), the flags lengths are converted to meters.

The photograph to the left shows an apparatus that is very similar to the one used by the group. All collisions in the experiment must occur between the two photo gates. The track itself should be level. The masses of each glider must be found in kilograms; initially the gliders will not significantly differ in mass. Make sure the air track is level and working correctly before proceeding with the experiment. http://www.alkaad.com/pictures/airtrack.jpg

The gliders that used by the group were identical; at the least, the flags on the gliders must be uniform in size. This is because the flag length will be used to find the velocity of the glider.

For each trial, the percent difference between momentum values will be calculated to find the momentum lost from the collision. For momentum, this is given by:

| |

This

must remain under ten percent to consider the lab a success. To avoid doing hand calculations, which will slow down the efficiency of the lab, it is recommended to set up an excel table to calculate the data as it is collected. Trials Mass 1 (kg) Mass 2 (kg) Time bef. (1) Time aft. (1) Time bef. (2)

% Difference

After having the excel table set up, and the mass of the gliders determined; the trials can begin. Part 1 deals with elastic collisions, the ends of the gliders must be set up to bounce off of each other. Glider 2 will be placed in a stationary position in between the two photo gates. Glider 1 is given an initial push towards glider 2. Glider 1 will pass through the first photo gate, collide and bounce off of glider 2, causing it to re-trip the photo gate that it has passed. The photo gates are set to read the total time tripped by the gliders, and keep a memory of its first trip time. The collision will cause glider 2 to move from its stationary position and tripped the second photo gate. After the collision, both gliders will be headed outward to each end of the air track, they must be stopped after they trip/re-trip the photo gates. The before and after momentum values must be calculated for this trial, since glider 1 starts out in a stationary position, its initial velocity is zero. Glider 1 has no initial momentum, so the initial momentum of the system will be equal to, glider will be given by . Remember that the initial velocity of the . After the collision, glider one is

stopped, so its final velocity is zero. The final velocity of glider two will be its speed as it passes through the second photo gate: momentum will be found by . Since glider 1 stops, the final . Calculate the percent difference of

the momentums; repeat the procedure until 3 trials are completed with acceptable results. Part 1.2 observes elastic collisions, this time the gliders approach the photo gates from one end of the air track. Glider 2 is placed is front of glider 1 so it is closer to the photo gates than glider 1. Glider 2 is given a push towards the photo gates and shortly after, glider 1 is given

a push so that it collides with glider 2 while they are in between the photo gates. It is important that glider 1 passes through the first photo gate before glider 2 collides with it. The two gliders will bounce off of each other but continue down the air track. Both gliders will trip the second photo gate; they should be stopped when they reach the end of the track. Glider 2 is the leading glider; it is the first to trip both the first and second photo gate. The photo gates will display their total recorded trip time, as well as their initial reading. The initial velocity of the glider 2 is calculated through: the final velocity, at the second photo gate, The same concept applies for . The

photo gates display the total time that the gates where tripped, so to find the velocity of glider 1, the difference of the total reading and the initial reading is used. The same applies the final velocity, Now the momenta values can be found,

After completing

these calculations, the next step is to find the percent difference. Then complete at least two more trials for this part, place the data on the excel table. Part 1.3 repeats part 1, with one modification. 100 grams - 50 on each side - will be added to glider (2). Glider 2 will again be placed in a stationary position between the two photo gates. The procedure from part 1 is followed to with the mass changed for glider 2.

Part 1.4 is a reproduction of part 1.2, again there is a modification. The leading glider will have 100 grams added to it. The procedure of part 1.2 can be followed with the change in the mass of glider 2. Part 2.1 deals with inelastic collisions, so the gliders must have the appropriate ends towards each other that would make them stick. The masses of the two gliders should be equal for this part of the lab, remove any riding masses. Glider 2 will be placed at rest in between the two photo gates, it should remain stationary. The initial momentum is calculated as it was in part 1, that is, measurement, The same goes for the initial velocity Except, now the two gliders will combine and

pass through the second photo gate as one unit, so they will share a common final velocity. The combined gliders will have two flags that will trip the photo gate twice. If a flag cannot be removed from a glider, then simply use the initial reading of the second photo gate to find the units final velocity. calculated with the use of the shared final velocity, The next step is to calculate the percent difference of the momenta values. Part 2 also asks for the kinetic energy values before and after the collision; recall that Since glider 2 is not initially The final momentum is

moving, it has no kinetic energy; the initial kinetic energy of the system becomes, After the collision there should be a much different kinetic energy value, it is not expected that kinetic energy will be conserved, being that this is an inelastic collision. Final kinetic energy of the system, ( ) By obtaining the difference

between final and initial kinetic energy, one may be able to tell whether or not kinetic energy is observed. It may be desirable to use the percent difference formula to illustrate the discrepancy in the values.

| |

conducted; the formulas are used as needed. Part 2.2 is the last part of the lab, it deals with inelastic collisions. The gliders should already be set to stick to each other. The procedure in this part is similar to part 1.2; the gliders approach the photo gates from one end of the air track. Just like 1.2, glider 2 is placed is front of glider 1. Glider 2 is given a push, shortly after; glider 1 is given a push, and the two gliders collide whilst they are in between the photo gates. The two gliders will stick to each other and trip the second photo gate as they continue to travel down the air track. The equation for the initial velocity for glider two is the same as that in part 1.2 As well as in part 1.2, the initial velocity of glider 1 is found with the difference of the total reading and the initial reading of the first photo gate. shared; momentum follows part 1.2 The final momentum is found just like it is in part 2.1 The gliders are one unit when they pass through the second photo gate: The final velocity will be The method for finding the initial

Like the other trials, the percent difference of momenta must be calculated, and for this part, the discrepancy for the initial and final kinetic energy values as well. This time the each glider has its own initial velocity, the total initial kinetic energy is Then the final kinetic energy, after the crash, is: ( ) Determine if there is at all a

| |

conservation of kinetic energy, use the percent difference formula. After completion of all parts, print out the Exceltm table. Measurements and Calculations:

The groups recorded values can be found on the print out of the Microsoft Exceltmtable. Parts 1, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4: Is momentum conserved? Explain any discrepancies.

The trials in parts 1 1.4 had a percent difference of momentum transfer that remained under 5 %. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that momentum was conserved for this portion of the lab. Ideally, the momentum transferred from glider to glider would be exact, but in reality this is an exceedingly rare occurrence. There is a high probability that an inefficient transfer of momentum is responsible for the percent difference values. The ends of the glider may have absorbed for momentum than it projected. There is also the case of friction, which was negligible but not absolutely diminished. Friction would count as an external force; this would change the system to be non-conservative.

Part 2.1: Is momentum conserved for inelastic collisions? Explain any discrepancies. With percent differences that stayed under 9 %, one can conclude that momentum was conserved for these trials. Again there is there possibility of friction; however it is more likely that the stationary glider absorbs momentum itself. The velocity of the moving glider slows down due to the collision while the stationary speeds up due to the collision. The two velocities meet at an equilibrium point and the masses are combined. This new momentum is equal to the initial momentum; ideally the momentum values are exact. Is kinetic energy conserved for inelastic collisions? Explain any discrepancies. Kinetic energy values for Part 2 were calculated using the values on the table. Part 2.1 Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 0.0163794312 0.0305687222 0.0170548323 0.0083602603 0.0161377568 0.0101117310 64. 8 % 61.8 % 51.5 %

A high percent difference was expected for the inelastic collision portion of the lab. Inelastic collisions are characterized by the known change of kinetic energy. Part 2.2: Record your data, calculate the momenta before and after the collision, and kinetic energy before and after the collision. Explain any discrepancies.

Momentum was conserved for these last trials as well; percent difference did not stray above 2 %. Air resistance is a very small factor but it may have played a more significant role in these last trials. As the front glider moves, it disrupts the air it travels through, the glider behind is likely to be effected by this draft of the front glider. Essentially, the draft would affect the gliders velocity; this effect would not be perceivable to the naked eye, but it could explain such a low percent error. Kinetic energy values: Part 2.2 Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 0.0268857407 0.0457650738 0.0200776868 0.10878624 0.1830491145 .080314004 120.733 % 119.96 % 120 %

Again it was expected that there be a high percent difference in the kinetic energy values. All factors that were present in the previous trials were also acting on the gliders in these last trials. Conclusion: The transference of momentum is something used in everyday life. For example, a UFC fighter who wants to drive his partner to the ground, would build up his velocity towards him, that combined with his mass will build momentum. The momentum alone may be enough to achieve his objective, then there is proper technique. There is a relationship between momentum and energy. Kinetic Energy is a scalar (no specified direction) while

momentum is a vector (has a definite direction). Their applications are different kinetic energy is a

quantity that can increase or decrease by changing the momentum of an object. An object will build kinetic energy as it builds momentum. In an inelastic collision, the loss of kinetic energy is sometimes noticeable, such as a car crashing into a wall and stopping. Elastic collisions that conserve momentum are often needed for activities. Basketball for example, relies on constant elastic collisions with the ball and the floor. This is a simple task referred to as dribbling; whats going on is that the ball has a kinetic energy and a momentum downward. The ball has an elasticity that causes it to bounce off of the floor and return with almost the same kinetic energy and momentum. There is a slight loss due to conversion of energy to sound, but the elastic event suffices for the purpose of the sport.

- Types of CollisionsUploaded byGeum Jan Di
- Forces and Motion_example Lab ReportUploaded bylam104
- TEST IN ADVUploaded byvillarfrancia
- Exp. 6, Theory Rigid Body EquilibriumUploaded bydayangmyra
- CollisionsUploaded byExpertsmindEdu
- Conservation of Energy Lab ReportUploaded byCường Trí Nguyễn Đình
- Free Fall Experiment DiscussionUploaded byAnonymous iJOQiAIvPT
- Projectile Motion Experiment 1Uploaded byNeayzahn AcesSka
- Conservation of Momentum Lab XpUploaded byYousaf Bajwa
- lab report about the Conservation of Mechanical EnergyUploaded byFer Tamez
- Momentum, Energy, And CollisionsUploaded byjobi-wan
- Air Track CollisionsUploaded byShweta Sridhar
- Conservation of Linear Momentum Lab ReportUploaded byShang Divina Ebrada
- Projectile MotionUploaded byEmily Watts
- Collision labUploaded byMartha Argerich
- 6.7. ImpulsUploaded byArlita Amalia Sari
- MOMENTUM_ETEMS.pptUploaded byZulhisyam Nordin
- MomentumUploaded byZulhisyam Nordin
- Collision LabUploaded byDhairya Gandhi
- Ideal Gas Law DerivationUploaded byAnonymous yorzHjDBd
- Physics Semester 1 VocabularyUploaded by12vwala
- CENTRE OF MASS-JEE(MAIN)Uploaded byResonance Dlpd
- 7 Momentum HwUploaded byampay ayub
- Dokumen.tips Pelan Taktikal Bahasa Arab (1)Uploaded byRadziah Mohamed
- Experiment 202 (Individual).docxUploaded byCassandra Julia de Jesus
- Momentum Test Pre-AP 2012Uploaded bypoprocket888
- conservation-of-momentum-ppp-1213361160074257-8 (1)Uploaded byMohd Sabri Nor
- Chapter 2Uploaded bymu2kumaran
- IIT_2012_12_13_p1_p2_Phy_UN1_SCUploaded byjassyj33
- Motion in Two DimensionsUploaded byMundu Mustafa

- Characteristics of Modern ScienceUploaded byAdrian Paolo Soneres
- Crack down on the celebrity junkies Does media coverage of celebrity drug use pose a risk to young people.pdfUploaded bymartacarlos
- stevestrongUploaded byapi-245089800
- wpscoperatingprocedures-finalversionUploaded byapi-256800643
- Ah 1 Essay 1Uploaded bytacofixestanks
- Mental Health - Truth Be ToldUploaded byVania
- Jones, Christopher v. - Phd Thesis SummaryUploaded byombajra
- ‘Iron Cage of Rationality’ in Modern SocietyUploaded bySmitasumeghaGupta
- Urban Sociological TheoriesUploaded byNeha Jayaraman
- Man in Relation to His EnvironmentUploaded byAprille Sgrr
- R_PLACEMENTSUploaded byNikhil Saini
- 7 HabitsUploaded bySai Krishnan
- Starratt Dissertation GuideUploaded byJan Jacob
- A Modest Proposal AnalysisUploaded byBrandon Dothager
- Religion and MoralityUploaded bywadobi
- FulltextThesis-Vol2Uploaded byHenry Bettison
- Cigarette Use Attitudes and Effects of Acculturation Among Arab Immigrants in USAUploaded byr4aden
- comisiua europaeanaUploaded byhe he
- “Under-consumption” and the Marxist Theory of Crisis – Part One — Www.marxist.coUploaded bysheizareh
- Sartre Age of ReasonUploaded byriley
- Danielle Wilson EdTPA SES Assessment CommentaryUploaded byDanielle Wilson
- Rplsi Series CompUploaded bycheshankar
- Review of Roger Scruton's The Soul of the WorldUploaded byrhapsodysinger
- bp notesUploaded bygeetujw
- EYFS Statutory FrameworkUploaded byOvidiu Grosan
- Virginia Woolf & the Natural World BookUploaded byAnonymous FHCJuc
- SDGsUploaded byAghnia
- Active ListeningUploaded byAkram Kaladia
- Lesson Planning ChecklistUploaded byErcilia Delancer
- Project SynopsisUploaded byMurari Nayudu