Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No
1.
Modest (3) Not all documented; or missing some information. Provide some background information, but still missing some major points.
Weight
Score
PO Access
1 /5 Background information is nearly complete; missing some minor points. Background information is complete and well-written; provides all necessary background principles for the experiment. All experimental details are covered and wellwritten.
2.
PO8
/20
3.
Methods / Procedures
Important experimental details are covered; some minor details are missing.
2 /10 5 /25
4.
@ Depend on marking scheme (capping up to 25 marks) Poor elaboration, interpretation and evaluation of result. Able to elaborate, interpret and evaluate result analytically; but missing some important points. Not all important points are summarized; sufficient elaboration. Report is organized but not according to the complied format. Moderate appearance. Able to elaborate, interpret and evaluate result analytically; but minor improvements are needed. All important points are summarized; missing some minor points, sufficient elaboration. Report is organized and according to the complied format. Acceptable appearance. Able to elaborate, interpret and evaluate result analytically.
5.
Discussion
4 PO1 /20
6.
Conclusion
Attempt to summarize; but draws a weak elaboration. Report is organized but not according to the complied format. Poor appearance.
Summarizes all important points; appropriately addressed the objective, result and discussion. Report is organized and according to the complied format. Very good appearance.
3 /15
7.
Report is unorganized and not according to the complied format. Unacceptable appearance.
PO8