Evaluation of Training and Assessment

Evaluation of
Training and Assessment

specifically focusing on
Dangerous Goods
for
XXXX Transport, Victoria

(XXXX Depot)
Contents
Appendix 1.0 Appendix 2.0 Appendix 3.0 Appendix 4.0 Appendix 5.0 Appendix 6.0 Appendix 7.0 Appendix 8.0 Appendix 9.0 Appendix 10.0 Appendix 11.0 Appendix 12.0 Appendix 13.0 Pre Training Self Assessments (Employee) ................................................................. 3 Post Training Self Assessments (Employee).............................................................. 14 Reaction Sheets (Kirkpatrick) Employee ................................................................ 25 Reaction Sheets (Kirkpatrick) Employer ................................................................. 32 Quizzes (Formative Assessment) .............................................................................. 39 Assessment Records (Diagnostic Assessment) ......................................................... 63 Assessment Records (Summative Assessment) ........................................................ 74 Event Report (Data Analysis) .................................................................................... 85 Fines and Infringements (Data Analysis)................................................................... 86 Prosecutions (Data Analysis) ..................................................................................... 87 Records of Discussion (Employee) ............................................................................ 88 Records of Discussion (Employer) ............................................................................. 95 Observational Notes (Workplace) ............................................................................. 96
Appendix 1.0
Pre Training Self Assessments (Employee)
In this section of the evaluation, the collection of the Employee Self Assessments was completed to capture and gather data and information supporting the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Employees perspective of their pre training skills and knowledge within the area. The following are representations of Pre Training Self Assessments completed by Employees. Their names have been omitted and the data presented in a manner as to remove any characteristics with potential identifying markers, e.g. age, location of workplace, job role, position, etc. The data presented has been reproduced as printed information to remove any distinguishing traits able to be attained through recognition of handwriting (as per policy and agreements).
Self Assessment Participant 1 Instructions: Questions are based on the Unit of Competence TLID2707D Prepare for transport of dangerous goods and are designed to be asked and responded to verbally. This strategy has been devised and implemented to facilitate LLN needs and attain a more conclusive and accurate (undistorted) set of responses within the data.
Rating Scale: 1 No 2 Little 3 Some 4 Sufficient Understanding Understanding Understanding Understanding or Experience or Experience or Experience or Experience
Mapped To Element and Criteria
5 Excellent Understanding or Experience

SCALE 1 2 3 4 X X X X X X X 5
How well do you understand the following in relation to Dangerous Goods within your job role?
Comparing the load against the transport documentation and noting discrepancies identified Checking the load to ensure that dangerous goods labels are clearly visible and legible, and that packaged goods are correctly labelled Checking the load to ensure containers are not damaged Checking the load for compatibility or, where not compatible, checking for appropriate segregation in accordance with regulatory requirements Assessing the load to ensure that it is stowed and secured in or on vehicles in accordance with the current ADG Code and the National Load Restraint Guide Ensuring appropriate transport documentation and other relevant documents are located on the vehicle in accordance with regulatory requirements Assessing the vehicle for suitability and appropriateness to carry designated dangerous goods including classification, mass and configuration Ensuring that licence and insurance requirements (where relevant) are checked for conformity with the current Australian Code for the Transport of Dangerous Goods by Road and Rail and/or other applicable regulatory requirements Ensuring that load restraint system(s) is/are checked for serviceability and appropriateness to secure intended load Ensuring that the vehicle is correctly and clearly marked/ placarded for the load being carried Emergency information for each type of transported dangerous good is noted Regulatory and workplace procedures for an incident are noted including notification of relevant personnel and authorities and, where appropriate, use of equipment for containment, clean up or recovery Personal protective equipment and safety equipment are checked for operational capability and appropriateness to the proposed load Emergency information is located in the cabin in accordance with current ADG Code requirements Selection of a route plan taking into consideration the potential difficulties including regulatory restrictions, traffic flow and conditions, obstacles, road standards and construction activities Regulatory and workplace procedures for driving, parking, loading and unloading are identified including actions for disengaging and/or securing the vehicle
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
X X X X X X X X
2.3 2.4 3.1
3.2
3.3 3.4 4.1
4.2
Checking and inspecting the load for security to travel in accordance with relevant regulations/permit requirements and the current ADG Code Completing all required documentation for the dangerous goods in accordance with regulatory and workplace requirements
SCALE 1 2 3 4 X X 5
5.1 5.2
Individual Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data
Participant 1
100% 80% 60% 40%
Excellent Sufficient
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Group Average Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data
Group Average
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Self Assessment Participant 2 Instructions: Questions are based on the Unit of Competence TLID2707D Prepare for transport of dangerous goods and are designed to be asked and responded to verbally. This strategy has been devised and implemented to facilitate LLN needs and attain a more conclusive and accurate (undistorted) set of responses within the data. Rating Scale: 1 No 2 Little 3 Some 4 Sufficient Understanding Understanding Understanding Understanding or Experience or Experience or Experience or Experience

SCALE 1 2 3 X X X X X X X 4 5
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
X X X X X X X X
2.3 2.4 3.1
3.2
3.3 3.4 4.1
4.2
SCALE 1 X X 2 3 4 5
5.1 5.2
Participant 2
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Group Average
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
X X X X X X X X
2.3 2.4 3.1
3.2
3.3 3.4 4.1
4.2
SCALE 1 X X 2 3 4 5
5.1 5.2
Participant 3
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Group Average
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
X X X X X X X X
2.3 2.4 3.1
3.2
3.3 3.4 4.1
4.2
SCALE 1 2 X X 3 4 5
5.1 5.2
Participant 4
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Group Average
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2

SCALE 1 2 X X X X X X X 3 4 5
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
X X X X X X X X
2.3 2.4 3.1
3.2
3.3 3.4 4.1
4.2
SCALE 1 X X 2 3 4 5
5.1
5.2
Participant 5
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Group Average
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Appendix 2.0
Post Training Self Assessments (Employee)
In this section of the evaluation, the collection of the Employee Self Assessments was completed to capture and gather data and information supporting the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Employees perspective of their post training skills and knowledge within the area. The following are representations of Post Training Self Assessments completed by Employees. Their names have been omitted and the data presented in a manner as to remove any characteristics with potential identifying markers, e.g. age, location of workplace, job role, position, etc. The data presented has been reproduced as printed information to remove any distinguishing traits able to be attained through recognition of handwriting (as per policy and agreements).

SCALE 1 2 3 4 5 X X X X X X X
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
X X X X X X X X
2.3 2.4 3.1
3.2
3.3 3.4 4.1
4.2
SCALE 1 2 3 4 X X 5
5.1
5.2
Participant 1
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Group Average
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Self Assessment Participant 2 Instructions: Questions are based on the Unit of Competence TLID2707D Prepare for transport of dangerous goods and are designed to be asked and responded to verbally. This strategy has been devised and implemented to facilitate LLN needs and attain a more conclusive and accurate (undistorted) set of responses within the data. Rating Scale: 1 No 2 Little 3 Some 4 Sufficient Understanding Understanding Understanding Understanding or Experience or Experience or Experience or Experience

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
X X X X X X X X
2.3 2.4 3.1
3.2
3.3 3.4 4.1
4.2
SCALE 1 2 3 4 X X 5
5.1
5.2
Participant 2
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Group Average
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
X X X X X X X X
2.3 2.4 3.1
3.2
3.3 3.4 4.1
4.2
SCALE 1 2 3 4 X X 5
5.1
5.2
Participant 3
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Group Average
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
X X X X X X X X
2.3 2.4 3.1
3.2
3.3 3.4 4.1
4.2
SCALE 1 2 3 4 X X 5
5.1
5.2
Participant 4
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Group Average
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
X X X X X X X X
2.3 2.4 3.1
3.2
3.3 3.4 4.1
4.2
SCALE 1 2 3 X X 4 5
5.1
5.2
Participant 5
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Group Average
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2
Appendix 3.0
Reaction Sheets (Kirkpatrick) Employee
In this section of the evaluation, the collection of the Reaction Sheets was completed to capture and gather data and information supporting the qualitative analysis of the Employees perspective of their experiencing the training and assessment process. The following section contains a copy of the (blank) feedback (Reaction) sheet to be completed by Employees. The collection of data through anonymous submission have allowed the identity of the participants to be protected, their names have been omitted from the electronic data presented in a manner as to remove any characteristics with potential identifying markers, e.g. age, location of workplace, job role, position, etc. The data presented has been reproduced as printed information to remove any distinguishing traits able to be attained through recognition of handwriting (as per policy and agreements). Following the example reaction sheet is the collective data related to the feedback of the targeted participants.
Reaction Sheets (Blank) Feedback Instructions: The following questions and scales are intended to gather information on what you thought and felt about the training program, its usefulness and relevance to your learning and/or role. Please answer each question in line with your personal experience as this will help us improve the quality of the training we provide in future sessions.
In a word, how did you feel the flow of the training session and delivery of information was? _________________________________________________________________________ Using the scale below, how would you describe the flow of the training session and delivery of information? Very Good Very Poor Flow Flow 1 2 3 4 5
Using the scale below, how focused do you feel the training session was on your learning needs? Focused Very No Focus Well 1 2 3 4 5
In a word, how would you describe this training session? _________________________________________________________________________ Using the scale below, how would you describe this training session? No Value 1 Great Value 5
Using the scale below, how well did the resources used in the training session support your learning? Not At All 1 Very Well 5
Using the scale below, how likely is it that you think you will refer back to the resources used in the training session while on the job? Not At All 1 Very Likely 5
Using the scale below, how would you describe your confidence in applying what you have learnt from the training session in your workplace/job role? Not Confident 1 Very Confident 5
Using the scale below, how would you describe the relevance of the training session? Not Relevant 1 Very Relevant 5
In a word, how would you describe the length of time provided for this training session? _________________________________________________________________________ Using the scale below, would you describe the length of time provided for this training session as enough? Strongly Disagree 1 Strongly Agree 2 3 4 5
Using the scale below, how useful do you believe your learning from training session will be within your work? Not At All 1 Very Useful 5
10
In short, how would you describe the level of support from the Instructor provided within your learning? _________________________________________________________________________ Using the scale below, would you describe the level of support provided for this training session as enough? Strongly Disagree 1 Strongly Agree 2 3 4 5
11
Using the scale below, how confident were you in the level of the Instructors of knowledge for the subject? Not Confident 1 Very Confident 5
12
Using the scale below, would you describe the type of interaction/conduct from the Instructor as being supportive of your learning experience? Strongly Disagree 1 Strongly Agree 2 3 4 5
13
Using the scale below, would you describe training environment as being supportive your learning experience? Strongly Disagree 1 Strongly Agree 2 3 4 5
14
Using the scale below, would you describe the timing (day of the week/time of day) of the training as being practical? Strongly Disagree 1 Strongly Agree 2 3 4 5
15
Using the scale below, would you say that after completing this training you would be likely to recommend it to other people? Very Unlikely 1 Very Likely 5
16
What specific comments would you like to make about your experience? _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________
Data collected through the Reaction Sheets returned the following results based on the spread of focus across the following spectrum of questions designed to elicit the Learners response in relation to how they experienced the process; Learner Needs Q4 Q2 Q12 Q5 Q8 Q13 Q10 Q15 Q11 Q6 Q1 Q3 Q14 Quality of Service
Participant D
Business R.O.I
Q7
Q9
Learner Satisfaction
Participant C Participant A Participant B Participant E 4 4 great 4 5 4.5 4 4 satisfactory well focused 3.5 4.5 4 4.5 4.5 4 3.5 4 good fair clear
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
1 2 3 4 5 6 Question 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
3 4 4.5 5 4 4.5 4.5 3.5 4 4 4 4.5 4 3 4
ok interesting
4 3.5 4 4 3.5 3.5 4
smooth informative
3.5 3.5 4 4.5 4 4 5
good helpful
4 4.5 4.5 5 4.5 4.5 5
comprehensive
good
enough helpful
4 4.5 3.5 4.5 5 3.5 2.5 3.5
ok reasonable
5 5 3.5 4.5 4 4 3 4
good good
4.5 5 4.5 4 5 3.5 4 4.5
With the data having been analysed and interpreted into a group graphed overview, the results for the Learner based evaluation returned the following;
Applied Likert Scale
5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Participant A Participant B Participant C Participant D Participant E
Evaluation Section
The data reviewed to represent a collective average of the results collected for the Learner based evaluation returned the following;
5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Group Average Benchmark (4.25)
Evaluation Section
The Learner based evaluation results returned in the data indicate that there are key areas of quality that need to be addressed in relation to the determined benchmark. These areas include those found in; Evaluation Section 1 2 3 5 6 8 10 13 14 15 Area of Learner Focus Quality/Satisfaction Quality/Needs Quality/Satisfaction R.O.I/Needs R.O.I/Satisfaction R.O.I/Needs Quality/Needs Quality/Needs Quality/Satisfaction Quality/Satisfaction/Needs/R.O.I Targeted Areas Session/Information Delivery/Flow Identification/Target Learning Needs Learner Perceived Value Transportability of Resources Transportability of Learning Duration of Training Learner Support (Instruction) Training Environment Scheduling/Time Table Business Referral/Recommendation Benchmark Variance 0.55 0.35 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.35 0.45 1.05 0.25
The information gathered through Question 16, where the Learner was provided with the opportunity to respond in the form of Specific Comments, further adds weight to the data in the context of the findings. Some of the comments left included; The training was pretty good for the time we had. I felt a bit rushed as we only had four hours. If we had some more time I believe that I would feel more confident in my understanding I liked the content, but the time for the training was not convenient for me This was very difficult to get to. My workplace is very busy and I believe Ill fall behind due to the time in training Some parts of the training felt rushed to me. Ill need more support to make this work in my job The Trainer was very good. The time of the day was not good for me
Taking these comments into consideration when reviewing the findings from the statistical data, if adjustments were made to the day/time of the training and an allowance for either smaller groups or a reasonable extension of time were made, these strategies might support improvements.
Appendix 4.0
Reaction Sheets (Kirkpatrick) Employer
In this section of the evaluation, the collection of the Reaction Sheets was completed to capture and gather data and information supporting the qualitative analysis of the Employers perspective of their experiencing the training and assessment process and the operational impacts they believe the training has had on the organisation. The following are representations of Reaction Sheets completed by the Employer (nominated Managers, Supervisors, Leading Hands, etc.). Their names have been omitted and the data presented in a manner as to remove any characteristics with potential identifying markers, e.g. age, location of workplace, job role, position, etc. The data presented has been reproduced as printed information to remove any distinguishing traits able to be attained through recognition of handwriting (as per policy and agreements).
Reaction Sheets (Blank) Feedback Instructions: The following questions and scales are intended to gather information on what you thought and felt about you involvement with the training program, its usefulness and relevance to your staff learning and/or role, and the degree of value added to the organisation. Please answer each question in line with your personal experience as this will help us improve the quality of the training we provide in future sessions.
In a word, how did you feel the value of the training session and delivery of information was for the organisation? _________________________________________________________________________ Using the scale below, how would you describe the value of the training session and delivery of information for the organisation? Very Poor Value 1 Very Good Value 5
Using the scale below, from the results; how focused do you feel the training session was on your organisations learning needs? Focused Very No Focus Well 1 2 3 4 5
In a word, how would you describe your staffs attitude within their role (as linked to the training) after undertaking the training session? _________________________________________________________________________ Using the scale below, how would you describe behavioural impact of the training session for the organisation as; Harmful 1 Beneficial 5
Using the scale below, how well do you believe the resources used in the training session supported your organisations learning needs? Not At All 1 Very Well 5
Using the scale below, how frequently has your staff referred back to the resources issued in the training session while on the job? Very Not At All Frequently 1 2 3 4 5
Using the scale below, how would you describe your staffs confidence in applying what they have learnt from the training session while on the job? Not Confident 1 Very Confident 5
Using the scale below, how would you describe the relevance of the training session? Not Relevant 1 Very Relevant 5
Using the scale below, would you describe the length of time taken for this training session as appropriate? Strongly Disagree 1 Strongly Agree 2 3 4 5
Using the scale below, how useful do you believe your staffs learning from training session will be for their future within your organisation? Not At All 1 Very Useful 5
10
In short, how would you describe the level of service from the Training Provider within your experience? _________________________________________________________________________ Using the scale below, would you describe the level of service provided for this training session as recommendable? Strongly Disagree 1 Strongly Agree 2 3 4 5
11
Using the scale below, how confident were you in the level of the Instructors of knowledge for the subject delivered to your staff? Not Confident 1 Very Confident 5
12
Using the scale below, would you describe the type of interaction/conduct from the Instructor as being supportive of your staffs learning experience? Strongly Disagree 1 Strongly Agree 2 3 4 5
13
Using the scale below, would you describe training environment as being supportive your staffs learning experience? Strongly Disagree 1 Strongly Agree 2 3 4 5
14
Using the scale below, would you describe the timing (day of the week/time of day) of the training as being practical for your organisation? Strongly Disagree 1 Strongly Agree 2 3 4 5
15
Using the scale below, would you say that after receiving this training for your staff you would be likely to recommend the service to other organisations? Very Unlikely 1 Very Likely 5
16
What specific comments would you like to make about your experience? _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________
Data collected through the Reaction Sheets returned the following results based on the spread of focus across the following spectrum of questions designed to elicit the Employers response in relation to how they experienced the process; Organisations Needs Q9Q1 Q2 Q4 Q13 Q5 Q7 Q6 Q14 Q8 Q3
Q12 Q10 Q11 Q15
Organisations Satisfaction
Supervisor C Supervisor D Supervisor A Supervisor B Supervisor E 4 4 Improved 5 4 4 4.5 4 4 4.5 Attentive 4 4 4.5 4 3.5 4 Good Focused
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
Quality of Service
Business R.O.I
Written Response
Written Response
1 2 3 4 5 6 Question 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
4 4.5 4 3.5 3.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.5 4 3 4
Timely Better
4.5 4 4.5 4 4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Appropriate Responsible
4.5 4 4 4 4 4 4.5 4 5
Great Helpful
4 3.5 4 4.5 3.5 4 4 3.5 5
Good
Good
Targeted
4.5 4 5 3.5 2.5 4.5
Great
4 4.5 4 4 3 4
Good
4.5 4.5 5 3.5 4 4.5
With the data having been analysed and interpreted into a group graphed overview, the results for the Employer based evaluation returned the following;
5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Participant A Participant B Participant C Participant D Participant E
Evaluation Section
The data reviewed to represent a collective average of the results collected for the Employer based evaluation returned the following;
5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Group Average Benchmark (4.25)
Evaluation Section
The Employer based evaluation results returned in the data indicate that there are key areas of quality that need to be addressed in relation to the determined benchmark. These areas include those found in; Evaluation Section 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 13 14 15 Area of Employer Focus Needs/R.O.I Needs/R.O.I Needs/R.O.I Needs/R.O.I Needs/R.O.I Needs/R.O.I Satisfaction/R.O.I Quality/Satisfaction Quality/Satisfaction Quality/Needs Satisfaction/Quality/Needs/R.O.I Quality/Satisfaction Targeted Areas Value/Information Delivery Organisation Learning Needs Resources/Organisation Learning Needs Transportability of Resources Transportability of Learning Relevance of Training Training Duration Service/Recommendation Confidence/Specialist Knowledge Training Environment Timing/Schedule Design Satisfaction/Recommendation Benchmark Variance 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.45 0.05 0.05 0.25 0.05 0.05 0.45 1.05 0.05
The information gathered through Question 16, where the Employer was provided with the opportunity to respond in the form of Specific Comments, further adds weight to the data in the context of the findings. Some of the comments left included; The staff are more confident in what they are required to do, there have been some good things come from this About time! We have needed this for too long. I have seen some results from this that have made it worthwhile, in future Id suggest picking a day in the middle of the week; were too busy to be down staff on an Monday Good stuff, but can we work on when this type of training happens in the future? I have seen some people going to their course books a lot. Good to see they are putting what they learn into practice. Can you provide reference or pocket cards in future?
Taking these comments into consideration when reviewing the findings from the statistical data, if adjustments were made to the date/time of the training and an innovative approach to resource design to support transportability is applied, these strategies might further support improvements for the Employer.
Appendix 5.0
Quizzes (Formative Assessment)
In this section of the evaluation, the collection of the Quizzes (Formative Assessments) was completed to capture and gather data and information supporting the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Employees developing and learning within the training to measure their extent of attaining skills and knowledge within the area. The following are representations of the Quizzes completed by Employees. Their names have been omitted and the data presented in a manner as to remove any characteristics with potential identifying markers, e.g. age, location of workplace, job role, position, etc. The data presented has been reproduced as printed information to remove any distinguishing traits able to be attained through recognition of handwriting (as per policy and agreements).
QUIZ 1 - Participant 1 What Class/Division is this? Circle correct response & list Class / Division Number (e.g. Class or Division 2.1) Class or Division ____1_______ Does XXXX Transport this Class/ Division? Yes / No NO
Class or Division ____2.1______
YES
Class or Division ____2.2_____
YES
NO
YES
Class or Division ____3_______
YES
YES
Class or Division ___4.2______
YES
Class or Division ___5.1_______
YES
YES NO
YES
NO
Class or Division _____7______
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
QUIZ 1 Participant 5 What Class/Division is this? Circle correct response & list Class / Division Number (e.g. Class or Division 2.1) Class or Division ____1_______ Does XXXX Transport this Class/ Division? Yes / No NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
QUIZ 2 Participant 1
A receptacle containing 1,000L of the following Dangerous Goods product, UN No: 1789, Packaging Group II, Hazchem Code 2R has been manifested for transport by road on a Heavy Combination vehicle. From the information provided complete the necessary fields of the Emergency Information Panel.
HYDROCHLORIC ACID 1789 2R

XXXX 1800 331 331

XXXX 1800 331 331

XXXX 1800 331 331

XXXX 1800 331 331
HYDROCHLORIC ACID HYDROBROMIC ACID 1789 2R

XXXX 1800 331 331
Using the chart in your Prepare for Transport of Dangerous Goods Information Handbook, work through the list of Hazchem Emergency Action Codes. By combining the codes on the left you will work towards a final code which will be the combination of the codes listed (e.g. 3WE loaded with 2R = 3WE).
4P = 4W 3X
= 4W 2Z = 3Y 3S
= 4WE 2R = 2R 1T
= 3YE 3YE = 3YE 2S
3WE
4P = 4W 3X
= 4W 2Z = 3Y 3S
= 4WE 2R = 2R 1T
= 3WE 3YE = 3YE 2S
4P = 4W 3X
= 4W 2Z = 3Y 3S
= 4WE 2R = 2P 1T
2R
= 3YE
3YE = 3YE 2S
3WE
4P = 4W 3X
= 4W 2Z = 3Z 3S
3Y
= 4WE
2R = 2R 1T
4WE
= 3W 3YE = 3Y 2S
3WE 3YE
4P = 4W 3X
= 4W 2Z = 3Y 3S
= 4W 2R = 2R 1T
4WE
= 3W 3YE = 3YE 2S
3WE
QUIZ 4 Participant 1 Using the segregation chart provided are the following Classes / Divisions / Products Compatible when transporting in a single transport unit with?
These Classes / Divisions?
Yes / No
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
(F) SEE TABLE 9.2
YES
NO
NO
NO
Yes / No
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
(F) 9.2
NO
NO
NO
Yes / No
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
Yes / No
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
(F) 9.2
NO
NO
NO
Yes / No
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
MAYBE - SEE 9.2
YES
NO
NO
NO
The data collected through the formative quiz sheets provided information to identify the specific areas of the training that the participants were able and unable to demonstrate a working knowledge of. This data is represented in the graphs below. As an observation of the data and how it has been presented, it appears that in some areas Participant 4 may have copied participant 1s answers (or vice versa). Quiz 1 Results;
13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Correct Responses (out of 13)
Participant A Participant B Participant C Participant D Participant E Benchmark
C
Participants
Participants A and B provided responses in the first activity that supported their diagnostic and self assessment in relation to their understanding of the key aspects surrounding basic familiarisation and understanding of the terminologies applied in the various areas of dangerous goods. Participants C, D and E indicated that prior to the training that they lacked in a number of areas in relation to understanding of the processes and principles of dangerous goods. The results here reflect that their self assessments were probably underrated when compared to their level of understanding. Most who have little or no knowledge return much lower results than those returned by Participants C, D and E. Quiz 2 Results;
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Participant A Participant B Participant C Participant D Participant E Benchmark
C
Participants
In line with the findings from quiz 1, the participants here returned a much higher result than expected. All were able to achieve a standard in this quiz that is above the 75% benchmark.
Quiz 3 Results;
8 7
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Participant A Participant B Participant C Participant D Participant E
C
Participants
Benchmark
Quiz 3 consists of more complex workings than the previous two quizzes. This appears to have returned results that are closer to the data collected in the diagnostic and self assessment. Although there are consistencies with the results achieved with Participants C and E, their workings and the errors made were not common, which indicates that the workings are their own. Quiz 4 Results;
10 9
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Participant A Participant B Participant C Participant D Participant E
C
Participants
Benchmark
Quiz 4 as the final formative quiz is designed to put the entire working knowledge obtained in the methods of compatibility and segregation to work. As a multi-layerd activity this requires a good working knowledge to be obtained through the training and exercises beofre attempting the quiz. The results gathered here indicate that the working knowledge of the group appears to be consistent with the standards required to achieve the benchmark in the activity. Participant C shows a fairly solid result for their self assessed ablitity considering the complexity of the activity.
Total Results (%)

100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Participant A Participant B Participant C Participant D Participant E
C
Participants
Benchmark
Through the analysis of the Formative Assessments conducted, the successful completion achieved by of 80% of the participants using the quiz sheets to meet the benchmark is a positive indicator that the training has provided a more substantial basis for supporting the Participants understanding of the content through measuring their ability to put the knowledge in to practice. Participant Ds final percentage was greatly impacted upon by their performance in quiz 3. This is one of the most abstract and complicated processes in the training, and as supported by their comments in the reaction feedback sheets (see Appendix 3) where their comments were; Some parts of the training felt rushed to me. Ill need more support to make this work in my job supports the need for the training to be more inclusive in areas, and for the timeframe for some aspects in the delivery to be expanded to support the learning process.
Appendix 6.0
Assessment Records (Diagnostic Assessment)
In this section of the evaluation, the collection of Assessment Records (Diagnostic Assessment) was completed to capture and gather data and information supporting the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Employees development and learning arising from previous training and on the job experience in order to measure their extent of current knowledge within the area. The following are representations of the Assessment Records (Diagnostic Assessment) completed by Employees. Their names have been omitted and the data presented in a manner as to remove any characteristics with potential identifying markers, e.g. age, location of workplace, job role, position, etc. The data presented has been reproduced as printed information to remove any distinguishing traits able to be attained through recognition of handwriting (as per policy and agreements).
Diagnostic Assessment Participant 1 Instructions: Questions are based on the Unit of Competence TLID2707D Prepare for transport of dangerous goods and are designed to be asked and responded to verbally. This strategy has been devised and implemented to facilitate LLN needs and attain a more conclusive and accurate (undistorted) set of responses within the data. Rating Scale: 1 No Knowledge 2 Little Knowledge 3 Some Knowledge 4 Sufficient Knowledge 5 Above Required Knowledge
Scale Par 1 Question 1 What are the Dangerous Goods name for the following Classes / Divisions: a) Division 2.1 b) Division 4.1 c) Division 5.1 d) Class 8 e) Class 9 What are the volume and/or mass limits for receptacles before they require the driver to hold a Dangerous Goods Licence? What are the trigger points for a placard load of Dangerous Goods? Where must a placard be fixed to a transport unit that is loaded with one receptacle containing 1,000L of a Packaging Group III Dangerous Goods product? How must a heavy combination vehicle loaded with 5 IBCs containing Dangerous Goods be marked? From the EACs provided, determine what the resultant EAC code is: UN No 2461 Hazchem Code: 3YE UN No 2280 Hazchem Code: 2X Un No 2318 Hazchem Code: 1Y What are the load restraint requirements for Dangerous Goods loaded on a transport unit? What classes or divisions must not be loaded with food and/or food packaging? 2 3 4 5
1
Mapped to 1.2
2
Mapped to 2.2
3
Mapped to 2.1
4
Mapped to 1.2
5
Mapped to 2.4
6
Mapped to 3.1
7
Mapped to 1.5
8
Mapped to 1.4
Scale Par 1 9
Mapped to 1.6
Question 1 What items / documentation must be carried in a vehicles emergency information holder when transporting a placard load of Dangerous Goods? A road vehicle transporting a Placard Load of Dangerous Goods MUST be equipped with which items? In the event of an incident where Dangerous Goods are involved, who must be notified? What does a receptacle containing Dangerous Goods needs to be checked for before transport? What methods of segregation can be applied to a load to be transported in a single compartment transport unit? Which documentation is required to be located in the cabin of the vehicle when a placard load is loaded for transport? What must be inspected to ensure that security to travel is provided when the load contains dangerous goods? X X 2 3 4 5 X
10
Mapped to 3.3
11
Mapped to 4.2
12
Mapped to 1.3
13
Mapped to 1.4
14
Mapped to 3.4
15
Mapped to 5.1
Individual Diagnostic Assessment Response Data
Participant 1
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 4.2 5.1
Note: Elements 1.1, 2.3, 3.2, 4.1 and 5.2 were omitted due to their orientation towards observable skills rather than measuring knowledge alone.
1
Mapped to 1.2
2
Mapped to 2.2
3
Mapped to 2.1
4
Mapped to 1.2
5
Mapped to 2.4
6
Mapped to 3.1
7
Mapped to 1.5
8
Mapped to 1.4
Scale Par 1 9
Mapped to 1.6
Question 1 What items / documentation must be carried in a vehicles emergency information holder when transporting a placard load of Dangerous Goods? A road vehicle transporting a Placard Load of Dangerous Goods MUST be equipped with which items? In the event of an incident where Dangerous Goods are involved, who must be notified? What does a receptacle containing Dangerous Goods needs to be checked for before transport? What methods of segregation can be applied to a load to be transported in a single compartment transport unit? Which documentation is required to be located in the cabin of the vehicle when a placard load is loaded for transport? What must be inspected to ensure that security to travel is provided when the load contains dangerous goods? X X X 2 3 4 X 5
10
Mapped to 3.3
11
Mapped to 4.2
12
Mapped to 1.3
13
Mapped to 1.4
14
Mapped to 3.4
15
Mapped to 5.1
Participant 2
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 4.2 5.1
1
Mapped to 1.2
2
Mapped to 2.2
3
Mapped to 2.1
4
Mapped to 1.2
5
Mapped to 2.4
6
Mapped to 3.1
7
Mapped to 1.5
8
Mapped to 1.4
Scale Par 1 9
Mapped to 1.6
Question 1 What items / documentation must be carried in a vehicles emergency information holder when transporting a placard load of Dangerous Goods? A road vehicle transporting a Placard Load of Dangerous Goods MUST be equipped with which items? In the event of an incident where Dangerous Goods are involved, who must be notified? What does a receptacle containing Dangerous Goods needs to be checked for before transport? What methods of segregation can be applied to a load to be transported in a single compartment transport unit? Which documentation is required to be located in the cabin of the vehicle when a placard load is loaded for transport? What must be inspected to ensure that security to travel is provided when the load contains dangerous goods? X X 2 3 X 4 5
10
Mapped to 3.3
11
Mapped to 4.2
12
Mapped to 1.3
13
Mapped to 1.4
14
Mapped to 3.4
15
Mapped to 5.1
Participant 3
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 4.2 5.1
Scale Par 1 Question 1 What are the Dangerous Goods name for the following Classes / Divisions: a) Division 2.1 b) Division 4.1 c) Division 5.1 d) Class 8 e) Class 9 What are the volume and/or mass limits for receptacles before they require the driver to hold a Dangerous Goods Licence? What are the trigger points for a placard load of Dangerous Goods? Where must a placard be fixed to a transport unit that is loaded with one receptacle containing 1,000L of a Packaging Group III Dangerous Goods product? How must a heavy combination vehicle loaded with 5 IBCs containing Dangerous Goods be marked? From the EACs provided, determine what the resultant EAC code is: UN No 2461 Hazchem Code: 3YE UN No 2280 Hazchem Code: 2X Un No 2318 Hazchem Code: 1Y What are the load restraint requirements for Dangerous Goods loaded on a transport unit? What classes or divisions must not be loaded with food and/or food packaging? X 2 3 4 5
1
Mapped to 1.2
2
Mapped to 2.2
3
Mapped to 2.1
4
Mapped to 1.2
5
Mapped to 2.4
6
Mapped to 3.1
7
Mapped to 1.5
8
Mapped to 1.4
Scale Par 1 9
Mapped to 1.6
Question 1 What items / documentation must be carried in a vehicles emergency information holder when transporting a placard load of Dangerous Goods? A road vehicle transporting a Placard Load of Dangerous Goods MUST be equipped with which items? In the event of an incident where Dangerous Goods are involved, who must be notified? What does a receptacle containing Dangerous Goods needs to be checked for before transport? What methods of segregation can be applied to a load to be transported in a single compartment transport unit? Which documentation is required to be located in the cabin of the vehicle when a placard load is loaded for transport? What must be inspected to ensure that security to travel is provided when the load contains dangerous goods? X X X 2 3 X 4 5
10
Mapped to 3.3
11
Mapped to 4.2
12
Mapped to 1.3
13
Mapped to 1.4
14
Mapped to 3.4
15
Mapped to 5.1
Participant 4
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 4.2 5.1
1
Mapped to 1.2
2
Mapped to 2.2
3
Mapped to 2.1
4
Mapped to 1.2
5
Mapped to 2.4
6
Mapped to 3.1
7
Mapped to 1.5
8
Mapped to 1.4
Scale Par 1 9
Mapped to 1.6
Question 1 What items / documentation must be carried in a vehicles emergency information holder when transporting a placard load of Dangerous Goods? A road vehicle transporting a Placard Load of Dangerous Goods MUST be equipped with which items? In the event of an incident where Dangerous Goods are involved, who must be notified? What does a receptacle containing Dangerous Goods needs to be checked for before transport? What methods of segregation can be applied to a load to be transported in a single compartment transport unit? Which documentation is required to be located in the cabin of the vehicle when a placard load is loaded for transport? What must be inspected to ensure that security to travel is provided when the load contains dangerous goods? X 2 X 3 4 5
10
Mapped to 3.3
11
Mapped to 4.2
12
Mapped to 1.3
13
Mapped to 1.4
14
Mapped to 3.4
15
Mapped to 5.1
Participant 5
100% 80% 60% 40%
Some Little 20% No

0% 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 4.2 5.1
Appendix 7.0
Assessment Records (Summative Assessment)
In this section of the evaluation, the collection of Assessment Records (Summative Assessment) was completed to capture and gather data and information supporting the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Employees development and learning arising from undertaking targeted specific training in order to measure their extent of attained knowledge within the area. The following are representations of the Assessment Records (Summative Assessment) completed by Employees. Their names have been omitted and the data presented in a manner as to remove any characteristics with potential identifying markers, e.g. age, location of workplace, job role, position, etc. The data presented has been reproduced as printed information to remove any distinguishing traits able to be attained through recognition of handwriting (as per policy and agreements).
Summative Assessment Participant 1 Instructions: Questions are based on the Unit of Competence TLID2707D Prepare for transport of dangerous goods and are designed to be asked and responded to verbally. This strategy has been devised and implemented to facilitate LLN needs and attain a more conclusive and accurate (undistorted) set of responses within the data. Rating Scale: 1 No Knowledge 2 Little Knowledge 3 Some Knowledge 4 Sufficient Knowledge 5 Above Required Knowledge
1
Mapped to 1.2
2
Mapped to 2.2
3
Mapped to 2.1
4
Mapped to 1.2
5
Mapped to 2.4
6
Mapped to 3.1
7
Mapped to 1.5
8
Mapped to 1.4
Scale Par 1 9
Mapped to 1.6
10
Mapped to 3.3
11
Mapped to 4.2
12
Mapped to 1.3
13
Mapped to 1.4
14
Mapped to 3.4
15
Mapped to 5.1
Participant 1
100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0%
Excellent Sufficient Some Little No

1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 4.2 5.1
1
Mapped to 1.2
2
Mapped to 2.2
3
Mapped to 2.1
4
Mapped to 1.2
5
Mapped to 2.4
6
Mapped to 3.1
7
Mapped to 1.5
8
Mapped to 1.4
Scale Par 1 9
Mapped to 1.6
Question 1 What items / documentation must be carried in a vehicles emergency information holder when transporting a placard load of Dangerous Goods? A road vehicle transporting a Placard Load of Dangerous Goods MUST be equipped with which items? In the event of an incident where Dangerous Goods are involved, who must be notified? What does a receptacle containing Dangerous Goods needs to be checked for before transport? What methods of segregation can be applied to a load to be transported in a single compartment transport unit? Which documentation is required to be located in the cabin of the vehicle when a placard load is loaded for transport? What must be inspected to ensure that security to travel is provided when the load contains dangerous goods? X X X 2 3 4 5 X
10
Mapped to 3.3
11
Mapped to 4.2
12
Mapped to 1.3
13
Mapped to 1.4
14
Mapped to 3.4
15
Mapped to 5.1
Participant 2
100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00%
Participant 2
Some Little 20.00% No

0.00% 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 4.2 5.1
1
Mapped to 1.2
2
Mapped to 2.2
3
Mapped to 2.1
4
Mapped to 1.2
5
Mapped to 2.4
6
Mapped to 3.1
7
Mapped to 1.5
X X
8
Mapped to 1.4
Scale Par 1 9
Mapped to 1.6
Question 1 What items / documentation must be carried in a vehicles emergency information holder when transporting a placard load of Dangerous Goods? A road vehicle transporting a Placard Load of Dangerous Goods MUST be equipped with which items? In the event of an incident where Dangerous Goods are involved, who must be notified? What does a receptacle containing Dangerous Goods needs to be checked for before transport? What methods of segregation can be applied to a load to be transported in a single compartment transport unit? Which documentation is required to be located in the cabin of the vehicle when a placard load is loaded for transport? What must be inspected to ensure that security to travel is provided when the load contains dangerous goods? X X X 2 3 4 X 5
10
Mapped to 3.3
11
Mapped to 4.2
12
Mapped to 1.3
13
Mapped to 1.4
14
Mapped to 3.4
15
Mapped to 5.1
Participant 3
100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%

1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 4.2 5.1 Participant 3
1
Mapped to 1.2
2
Mapped to 2.2
3
Mapped to 2.1
4
Mapped to 1.2
5
Mapped to 2.4
6
Mapped to 3.1
7
Mapped to 1.5
8
Mapped to 1.4
Scale Par 1 9
Mapped to 1.6
Question 1 What items / documentation must be carried in a vehicles emergency information holder when transporting a placard load of Dangerous Goods? A road vehicle transporting a Placard Load of Dangerous Goods MUST be equipped with which items? In the event of an incident where Dangerous Goods are involved, who must be notified? What does a receptacle containing Dangerous Goods needs to be checked for before transport? What methods of segregation can be applied to a load to be transported in a single compartment transport unit? Which documentation is required to be located in the cabin of the vehicle when a placard load is loaded for transport? What must be inspected to ensure that security to travel is provided when the load contains dangerous goods? X 2 3 X 4 5
10
Mapped to 3.3
11
Mapped to 4.2
12
Mapped to 1.3
13
Mapped to 1.4
14
Mapped to 3.4
15
Mapped to 5.1
Participant 4
100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%

1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 4.2 5.1 Participant 4
1
Mapped to 1.2
2
Mapped to 2.2
3
Mapped to 2.1
4
Mapped to 1.2
5
Mapped to 2.4
6
Mapped to 3.1
7
Mapped to 1.5
8
Mapped to 1.4
Scale Par 1 9
Mapped to 1.6
10
Mapped to 3.3
11
Mapped to 4.2
12
Mapped to 1.3
13
Mapped to 1.4
14
Mapped to 3.4
15
Mapped to 5.1
Participant 5
100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%

1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 4.2 5.1 Participant 5
Appendix 8.0
Event Report (Data Analysis)
In this section of the evaluation, the collection of information from the internal Event Reporting system was completed to capture and gather data and information for analysis supporting the business metrics surrounding compliance and efficiencies within the operational process. Prior to undertaking the training in Dangerous Goods I was able to gather statistics from the organisations Event Reporting system. Event Reporting is a process where issues are logged from various areas of the business with the responsibility for rectification placed in the hands of the process owner. This allows the logging of a wide number of compliance breaches, delays and other impacts to return a dollar value on the impact placed upon the business through the identified practice. Dangerous Goods ER Data;
Dangerous Goods ER Data

40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
W/E 11 Nov W/E 03 Dec
Error Type The data collected and displayed as above is taken from the week ending the 11th of November for the pre training measurement of the number and type of breaches identified, followed by data collected after the training had been completed and Employees being afforded time to practice their learnt knowledge in enhancing their skills under supervision. The improvements on operational measure reflected in the decreased occurrences as shown below;
Decrease
100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Decrease
Error Type
Appendix 9.0
Fines and Infringements (Data Analysis)
In this section of the evaluation, the collection of information relating to Fines and Infringements was completed to capture and gather data and information for analysis supporting the business metrics surrounding compliance and efficiencies within the operational process. Prior to undertaking the training, the organisation had experienced a number of incidents where fines were issued for breaches. The figures for the three months prior to the training included;
Fines - August to November 2011

Inccorect Placarding
$23,000
$1,100
Inccorect Documentation No Placarding
$6,500
$12,000
$650
Insufficint Load Restraint Load Above Gate Height
The data collected from the end of November to the end of December provided for a snap shot of the shorter period, which even when adjusted to reflect the same time frame, returned a more positive result.
Fines - November to December 2011

$495
Inccorect Documentation
$1,600
Load Above Gate Height
The results indicate that there has been an improvement in the results, however the overall elimination of such adverse impacts on the operation will require a more wide spread approach to include the greater body of Employees in the training to fill any remaining gaps.
Appendix 10.0
Prosecutions (Data Analysis)
In this section of the evaluation, the collection of information relating to Prosecutions was completed to capture and gather data and information for analysis supporting the business metrics surrounding compliance and efficiencies within the operational process. Prior to the training program there had been three prosecutions; one for failure to apply placarding to a load that required placarding, this resulted in a fine of $23,000. Another for incorrect placarding, this resulted in a $12,000 fine. And on for incorrect documentation which resulted in a $6,500 fine. For the period of end November to end December there were no pending or resulting prosecutions. Thus the data here shows a significant improvement in business outcomes.
Appendix 11.0
Records of Discussion (Employee)
In this section of the evaluation, the examination of documented discussions with Employees was completed to further capture and gather data and information supporting the qualitative analysis of the Employees involvement in the evaluation process. The notes from the conversations conducted a few days after the training were complied to verify the validity of the participants responses provided through the reaction sheets.
Participant 1 Thursday 24th November 10:00am: Face to face post training. Q1) What did you think of the flow of the training session and delivery of information? - I thought it made sense, it was pretty good. Q2) How do you feel about the training sessions ability to meet your learning needs? - The training was what I had asked to attend and it covered what I needed to know. Q3) Do you feel that there was value in the training session? - I got a lot out of it. Its helped me understand parts of my job better. Q4) What do you think of the resources ability to support your learning? - Ive used the book I got a few times, yeah, its been helpful. Q5) Have you found the resources useful on the job? - I think I used the book three times this week since the training, its easy to follow. Q6) Has the training session provided you with confidence in what you have learnt? - Yes. Q7) Was what you learnt in the training session relevant to your job role? - Very relevant. Q8) What do you think about the duration of the training session? - It was just enough. Any longer and I would have said it was too much. Q9) How useful was the information provided in the training session for your job role? - The info has been very useful. Q10) Do you feel you had sufficient support from the Instructor during the training session? - Plenty of support. I was able to understand what I needed to. Q11) What did the Instructors level of knowledge do to support your learning? - It made the points we were covering easier to get. I think if the Instructor didnt know his stuff then it would have been very difficult. Q12) Do you feel that the Instructor was supportive of your learning needs? - Yes. Q13) Do you feel that the training environment was supportive of your learning needs? - The training room is fine. I like the fact that we were taken on to the floor as well. Q14) How did you feel about the time and day selected for the training? - Not the best day for this much time away from my job. I had a lot to catch up on. Q15) Do you feel that the experience you had in this training is one that you would think of in a positive way? - Id say it was positive. Q16) Are there any specific points you would like to make about your experience? - Even though I think that if the training went for too much longer that it would have been too much, Id have to say that some parts of it left me a little confused, so ore time on them would be helpful. Maybe less time on the real basic stuff at the start.
Participant 2 Thursday 24th November 10:25am: Face to face post training Q1) What did you think of the flow of the training session and delivery of information? - Seemed pretty good to me. Q2) How do you feel about the training sessions ability to meet your learning needs? - It taught me what I needed to know. Q3) Do you feel that there was value in the training session? - What took so long for this to happen? Yeah, there was a lot of value for me. Q4) What do you think of the resources ability to support your learning? - Pretty good. I found the guide easy to follow, and the little quiz sheets at the end of each section were helpful in practicing too. Q5) Have you found the resources useful on the job? - Ive pulled it out a bit. Q6) Has the training session provided you with confidence in what you have learnt? - Yes. I feel like Im on the right track more now. Q7) Was what you learnt in the training session relevant to your job role? - It was. Q8) What do you think about the duration of the training session? - Not bad. Could have been a bit longer in parts. Q9) How useful was the information provided in the training session for your job role? - Its been very useful, practical. Q10) Do you feel you had sufficient support from the Instructor during the training session? - Enough. Q11) What did the Instructors level of knowledge do to support your learning? - It didnt make it any harder. He knows his stuff. Q12) Do you feel that the Instructor was supportive of your learning needs? - For sure. Q13) Do you feel that the training environment was supportive of your learning needs? - Not bad, but I thought it was a bit too hot in such a small room. Need the air conditioner on. Q14) How did you feel about the time and day selected for the training? - I know this needed to happen, and I needed to be there, but it couldnt have been at a worse time. Next time Id prefer the middle of the week. Q15) Do you feel that the experience you had in this training is one that you would think of in a positive way? - You could say that. It wasnt bad, just the timing. Q16) Are there any specific points you would like to make about your experience? - Nothing that hasnt been said.
Participant 3 Thursday 24th November 11:10am: Telephone post training Q1) What did you think of the flow of the training session and delivery of information? - Not bad. I picked up a lot I didnt know. Q2) How do you feel about the training sessions ability to meet your learning needs? - I got a bit out of it. Q3) Do you feel that there was value in the training session? - Yeah, its been good learning that stuff. Q4) What do you think of the resources ability to support your learning? - The book? I like it. Q5) Have you found the resources useful on the job? - Ive looked at it a bit, but not a lot Im too busy at the moment. Q6) Has the training session provided you with confidence in what you have learnt? - Yes. Q7) Was what you learnt in the training session relevant to your job role? - Couldnt be more relevant. Q8) What do you think about the duration of the training session? - I thought it was good for what we covered, just not the best time of day. Q9) How useful was the information provided in the training session for your job role? - Extremely useful. Q10) Do you feel you had sufficient support from the Instructor during the training session? - Yeah, well, maybe there could have been a bit more. Some of the stuff takes a little longer for me to get. Q11) What did the Instructors level of knowledge do to support your learning? - It helped that he could explain things clearly, I just need more time sometimes. Q12) Do you feel that the Instructor was supportive of your learning needs? - I suppose as supportive as he could be. There were others in the class who were quicker than me. I got a bit more attention, but maybe I could do with a bit extra when there is time. Q) What parts do you feel you need more support in? - The Hazchem thing was a bit hard to understand, but the guys have explained it a bit more to me. Q13) Do you feel that the training environment was supportive of your learning needs? - Yeah, there was nothing wrong with that. Q14) How did you feel about the time and day selected for the training? - Ask me another question no, this was not really good for me. Q15) Do you feel that the experience you had in this training is one that you would think of in a positive way? - Positive? Well there wasnt a lot about it that was negative, so yeah. Q16) Are there any specific points you would like to make about your experience? - Next time it would be nice to have some choice in the dates and times that training is happening so I can choose the best ones for me.
Participant 4 Thursday 24th November 11:45am: Face to face Q1) What did you think of the flow of the training session and delivery of information? - I liked it. Just dont ask me to do Hazchem codes. Q2) How do you feel about the training sessions ability to meet your learning needs? - I think it hit the spot. Q3) Do you feel that there was value in the training session? - Definitely. Q4) What do you think of the resources ability to support your learning? - They were well designed. Q5) Have you found the resources useful on the job? - Yes. Q6) Has the training session provided you with confidence in what you have learnt? - It has. Q7) Was what you learnt in the training session relevant to your job role? - Yes. Q8) What do you think about the duration of the training session? - Pretty good. Q9) How useful was the information provided in the training session for your job role? - Very useful. Q10) Do you feel you had sufficient support from the Instructor during the training session? - I do. Q11) What did the Instructors level of knowledge do to support your learning? - It made the content easier to understand. Q12) Do you feel that the Instructor was supportive of your learning needs? - Very. But I didnt really need much support. Q13) Do you feel that the training environment was supportive of your learning needs? - All good there. I dont mind the training room. Q14) How did you feel about the time and day selected for the training? - I was happy with it. Q15) Do you feel that the experience you had in this training is one that you would think of in a positive way? - Yes. Q16) Are there any specific points you would like to make about your experience? - No thanks.
Participant 5 Thursday 24th November 12:20pm: Face to face Q1) What did you think of the flow of the training session and delivery of information? - It seemed pretty clear to me. Q2) How do you feel about the training sessions ability to meet your learning needs? - I got what I needed out of it. Q3) Do you feel that there was value in the training session? - Yes. Id agree. Q4) What do you think of the resources ability to support your learning? - It was helpful. Q5) Have you found the resources useful on the job? - Yes. I like the flow charts; they make it easy to follow the process. Q6) Has the training session provided you with confidence in what you have learnt? - It has. Q7) Was what you learnt in the training session relevant to your job role? - Ive been able to put it into practice. Its becoming a bigger part of my job. Q8) What do you think about the duration of the training session? - It was almost too long in some parts. Q9) How useful was the information provided in the training session for your job role? - Its proven to be very useful. Q10) Do you feel you had sufficient support from the Instructor during the training session? - Yes. It was good that there were only five of us in the group. Q11) What did the Instructors level of knowledge do to support your learning? - He wasnt confused, so neither was I. Q12) Do you feel that the Instructor was supportive of your learning needs? - Yes. Q13) Do you feel that the training environment was supportive of your learning needs? - Yes. Q14) How did you feel about the time and day selected for the training? - Now this is something that can be improved. Not first thing on a Monday in future, please. Q15) Do you feel that the experience you had in this training is one that you would think of in a positive way? - I would. I learnt a lot out of it. Q16) Are there any specific points you would like to make about your experience? - Can we pick a better time of day next time?
The discussions in most parts supported what was provided in the reaction sheets earlier, although Participant 4 provided a less elaborate set of responses, when on the reaction sheets there were specific comments made to the effect that more time and support would be helpful in applying the content to their job role. The No Thanks response to the question requesting additional comments leads me to believe that there may be something of a negative aspect lingering with this participant and they just wanted to get this out of the road and move on. Id suggest revisiting parts of the training informally with Participant 4 on the job to rectify any negative perceptions and address any gaps.
Appendix 12.0
Records of Discussion (Employer)
In this section of the evaluation, the examination of documented discussions with the Employer (nominated Managers, Supervisors, Leading Hands, etc.) was completed to further capture and gather data and information supporting the qualitative analysis of the Employers involvement in the evaluation process.
Employer Representative 1 Friday 25th November 09:00am: Telephone post training. Q1) Do you think that there was value in the training session for the organisation? - I think we got what we needed. Q2) Would you say that the training met the learning needs of the organisation? - Yes, I would. Q3) What would you say about the attitude of the participants towards their job role after participating in the training? - I have seen staff take their roles more seriously. Q4) What do you think of the resources ability to support your learning? - Ive used the book I got a few times, yeah, its been helpful. Q5) Have your staff been noted to rely on the resources provided during their work on the job? - Ive seen a few pull the book out a couple of times. Q6) Have you noticed any improvements in the confidence of staff when completing tasks related to the training? - Yes, those who attended the training have been more confident in their work, and have been helping others too. Q7) Was the focus of the training session relevant to your staffs job role? - I believe it was relevant. Q8) What do you think about the duration of the training session? - Not bad, we managed for the time that people were away from their jobs. Q9) How would you describe the training sessions impact on the future needs for the organisation? - This will help me get the right people up to speed and plan for who will be the next supervisor. Q10) How would you describe your experience with the service provided? - Im happy with how things went, there were no problems I noticed. Q11) How would you describe the Instructors level of knowledge in relation to supporting the organisations learning needs? - Ive heard that the instructor was well versed and knew the content. Really couldnt ask for much more. Q12) Do you feel that the Instructors manner was supportive of your organisations learning needs? - Yes. Q13) Do you feel that the training environment was supportive of your staffs learning needs? - Yes, weve used the same facilities a number of times. Q14) How did you feel about the time and day selected for the training? - Things were ok in our area, but others were quite busy. Q15) Do you feel that the organisations experience in this training is one that you would call positive? - Yes, I believe so. Q16) Are there any specific points you would like to make about your experience? - It seems to have delivered what was needed. Im happy.
Employer Representative 2 Friday 25th November 09:40am: Telephone post training. Q1) Do you think that there was value in the training session for the organisation? - I have seen a good return on the investment made. Q2) Would you say that the training met the learning needs of the organisation? - It has. Q3) What would you say about the attitude of the participants towards their job role after participating in the training? - I have seen staff take their roles more seriously. Q4) What do you think of the resources ability to support your learning? - Ive used the book I got a few times, yeah, its been helpful. Q5) Have your staff been noted to rely on the resources provided during their work on the job? - Ive seen a few pull the book out a couple of times. Q6) Have you noticed any improvements in the confidence of staff when completing tasks related to the training? - Yes, those who attended the training have been more confident in their work, and have been helping others too. Q7) Was the focus of the training session relevant to your staffs job role? - I believe it was relevant. Q8) What do you think about the duration of the training session? - Not bad, we managed for the time that people were away from their jobs. Q9) How would you describe the training sessions impact on the future needs for the organisation? - This will help me get the right people up to speed and plan for who will be the next supervisor. Q10) How would you describe your experience with the service provided? - Im happy with how things went, there were no problems I noticed. Q11) How would you describe the Instructors level of knowledge in relation to supporting the organisations learning needs? - Ive heard that the instructor was well versed and knew the content. Really couldnt ask for much more. Q12) Do you feel that the Instructors manner was supportive of your organisations learning needs? - Yes. Q13) Do you feel that the training environment was supportive of your staffs learning needs? - Yes, weve used the same facilities a number of times. Q14) How did you feel about the time and day selected for the training? - Things were ok in our area, but others were quite busy. Q15) Do you feel that the organisations experience in this training is one that you would call positive? - Yes, I believe so. Q16) Are there any specific points you would like to make about your experience? - It seems to have delivered what was needed. Im happy.
Supervisor C
Supervisor D
Supervisor A
Supervisor B
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
Supervisor E 4 4 5 4 4 4.5 4 4 4.5
Written Response
1 2 3 4 5 6 Question 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
4 4.5 4 3.5 3.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.5 4 3 4
Timely Better
4.5 4 4.5 4 4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
4.5 4 4 4 4 4 4.5 4 5
Great Helpful
4 3.5 4 4.5 3.5 4 4 3.5 5
Good Improved
Good Focused
Targeted
4.5 4 5 3.5 2.5 4.5
Great
4 4.5 4 4 3 4
Good
4.5 4.5 5 3.5 4 4.5
Attentive
4 4 4.5 4 3.5 4
Good
Employer Representative 3 Friday 25th November 11:00am: Telephone post training. Q1) Do you think that there was value in the training session for the organisation? - I think we got what we needed. Q2) Would you say that the training met the learning needs of the organisation? - Yes, I would. Q3) What would you say about the attitude of the participants towards their job role after participating in the training? - I have seen staff take their roles more seriously. Q4) What do you think of the resources ability to support your learning? - Ive used the book I got a few times, yeah, its been helpful. Q5) Have your staff been noted to rely on the resources provided during their work on the job? - Ive seen a few pull the book out a couple of times. Q6) Have you noticed any improvements in the confidence of staff when completing tasks related to the training? - Yes, those who attended the training have been more confident in their work, and have been helping others too. Q7) Was the focus of the training session relevant to your staffs job role? - I believe it was relevant. Q8) What do you think about the duration of the training session? - Not bad, we managed for the time that people were away from their jobs. Q9) How would you describe the training sessions impact on the future needs for the organisation? - This will help me get the right people up to speed and plan for who will be the next supervisor. Q10) How would you describe your experience with the service provided? - Im happy with how things went, there were no problems I noticed. Q11) How would you describe the Instructors level of knowledge in relation to supporting the organisations learning needs? - Ive heard that the instructor was well versed and knew the content. Really couldnt ask for much more. Q12) Do you feel that the Instructors manner was supportive of your organisations learning needs? - Yes. Q13) Do you feel that the training environment was supportive of your staffs learning needs? - Yes, weve used the same facilities a number of times. Q14) How did you feel about the time and day selected for the training? - Things were ok in our area, but others were quite busy. Q15) Do you feel that the organisations experience in this training is one that you would call positive? - Yes, I believe so. Q16) Are there any specific points you would like to make about your experience? - It seems to have delivered what was needed. Im happy.
Supervisor C
Supervisor D
Supervisor A
Supervisor B
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
Supervisor E 4 4 5 4 4 4.5 4 4 4.5
Written Response
1 2 3 4 5 6 Question 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
4 4.5 4 3.5 3.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.5 4 3 4
Timely Better
4.5 4 4.5 4 4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
4.5 4 4 4 4 4 4.5 4 5
Great Helpful
4 3.5 4 4.5 3.5 4 4 3.5 5
Good Improved
Good Focused
Targeted
4.5 4 5 3.5 2.5 4.5
Great
4 4.5 4 4 3 4
Good
4.5 4.5 5 3.5 4 4.5
Attentive
4 4 4.5 4 3.5 4
Good
Employer Representative 4 Friday 25th November 12:20pm: Telephone post training. Q1) Do you think that there was value in the training session for the organisation? - I think we got what we needed. Q2) Would you say that the training met the learning needs of the organisation? - Yes, I would. Q3) What would you say about the attitude of the participants towards their job role after participating in the training? - I have seen staff take their roles more seriously. Q4) What do you think of the resources ability to support your learning? - Ive used the book I got a few times, yeah, its been helpful. Q5) Have your staff been noted to rely on the resources provided during their work on the job? - Ive seen a few pull the book out a couple of times. Q6) Have you noticed any improvements in the confidence of staff when completing tasks related to the training? - Yes, those who attended the training have been more confident in their work, and have been helping others too. Q7) Was the focus of the training session relevant to your staffs job role? - I believe it was relevant. Q8) What do you think about the duration of the training session? - Not bad, we managed for the time that people were away from their jobs. Q9) How would you describe the training sessions impact on the future needs for the organisation? - This will help me get the right people up to speed and plan for who will be the next supervisor. Q10) How would you describe your experience with the service provided? - Im happy with how things went, there were no problems I noticed. Q11) How would you describe the Instructors level of knowledge in relation to supporting the organisations learning needs? - Ive heard that the instructor was well versed and knew the content. Really couldnt ask for much more. Q12) Do you feel that the Instructors manner was supportive of your organisations learning needs? - Yes. Q13) Do you feel that the training environment was supportive of your staffs learning needs? - Yes, weve used the same facilities a number of times. Q14) How did you feel about the time and day selected for the training? - Things were ok in our area, but others were quite busy. Q15) Do you feel that the organisations experience in this training is one that you would call positive? - Yes, I believe so. Q16) Are there any specific points you would like to make about your experience? - It seems to have delivered what was needed. Im happy.
Supervisor C
Supervisor D
Supervisor A
Supervisor B
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
Supervisor E 4 4 5 4 4 4.5 4 4 4.5
Written Response
1 2 3 4 5 6 Question 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
4 4.5 4 3.5 3.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.5 4 3 4
Timely Better
4.5 4 4.5 4 4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
4.5 4 4 4 4 4 4.5 4 5
Great Helpful
4 3.5 4 4.5 3.5 4 4 3.5 5
Good Improved
Good Focused
Targeted
4.5 4 5 3.5 2.5 4.5
Great
4 4.5 4 4 3 4
Good
4.5 4.5 5 3.5 4 4.5
Attentive
4 4 4.5 4 3.5 4
Good
Employer Representative 5 Friday 25th November 14:15pm: Telephone post training. Q1) Do you think that there was value in the training session for the organisation? - I think we got what we needed. Q2) Would you say that the training met the learning needs of the organisation? - Yes, I would. Q3) What would you say about the attitude of the participants towards their job role after participating in the training? - I have seen staff take their roles more seriously. Q4) What do you think of the resources ability to support your learning? - Ive used the book I got a few times, yeah, its been helpful. Q5) Have your staff been noted to rely on the resources provided during their work on the job? - Ive seen a few pull the book out a couple of times. Q6) Have you noticed any improvements in the confidence of staff when completing tasks related to the training? - Yes, those who attended the training have been more confident in their work, and have been helping others too. Q7) Was the focus of the training session relevant to your staffs job role? - I believe it was relevant. Q8) What do you think about the duration of the training session? - Not bad, we managed for the time that people were away from their jobs. Q9) How would you describe the training sessions impact on the future needs for the organisation? - This will help me get the right people up to speed and plan for who will be the next supervisor. Q10) How would you describe your experience with the service provided? - Im happy with how things went, there were no problems I noticed. Q11) How would you describe the Instructors level of knowledge in relation to supporting the organisations learning needs? - Ive heard that the instructor was well versed and knew the content. Really couldnt ask for much more. Q12) Do you feel that the Instructors manner was supportive of your organisations learning needs? - Yes. Q13) Do you feel that the training environment was supportive of your staffs learning needs? - Yes, weve used the same facilities a number of times. Q14) How did you feel about the time and day selected for the training? - Things were ok in our area, but others were quite busy. Q15) Do you feel that the organisations experience in this training is one that you would call positive? - Yes, I believe so. Q16) Are there any specific points you would like to make about your experience? - It seems to have delivered what was needed. Im happy.
Supervisor C
Supervisor D
Supervisor A
Supervisor B
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
Written Response
Supervisor E 4 4 5 4 4 4.5 4 4 4.5
Written Response
1 2 3 4 5 6 Question 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
4 4.5 4 3.5 3.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.5 4 3 4
Timely Better
4.5 4 4.5 4 4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
4.5 4 4 4 4 4 4.5 4 5
Great Helpful
4 3.5 4 4.5 3.5 4 4 3.5 5
Good Improved
Good Focused
Targeted
4.5 4 5 3.5 2.5 4.5
Great
4 4.5 4 4 3 4
Good
4.5 4.5 5 3.5 4 4.5
Attentive
4 4 4.5 4 3.5 4
Good
The discussions in most parts supported what was provided in the reaction sheets earlier, although Participant 4 provided a less elaborate set of responses, when on the reaction sheets there were specific comments made to the effect that more time and support would be helpful in applying the content to their job role. The No Thanks response to the question requesting additional comments leads me to believe that there may be something of a negative aspect lingering with this participant and they just wanted to get this out of the road and move on. Id suggest revisiting parts of the training informally with Participant 4 on the job to rectify any negative perceptions and address any gaps.
Appendix 13.0
Observational Notes (Workplace)
In this section of the evaluation, the examination of documented observational notes was completed to further capture and gather data and information supporting the qualitative analysis of the evaluation process.
Summative Assessment Participant 1 Instructions: Observations are based on the Unit of Competence TLID2707D Prepare for transport of dangerous goods and are designed to be conducted with the participant on the job in their place of work. Simulations may be completed where observations are not able to be completed on the job. Rating Scale: 1 No Knowledge 2 Little Knowledge 3 Some Knowledge 4 Sufficient Knowledge 5 Above Required Knowledge
Scale Par 1 1 Task observation 1

Demonstrate correct use of PPE contained in Mapped Dangerous Goods Cabin Bag.
to 3.3
4 X
Demonstrate correct use of Spill Response equipment contained in Dangerous Goods Cabin Mapped Bag.
to 3.2
3
Mapped to 1.3
Identify suitable freight condition and explain what to look for to determine suitability to transport. Demonstrate and explain how the load is planned and configured to meet the requirements within the ADG Code and the Load Restraint guide.
4
Mapped to 1.5
Demonstrate the ability to correctly Placard for the load despatched and identify that the transport unit is Mapped suitably registered and insured for the transport of to 2.2 Dangerous Goods
Identify and explain the correct paperwork with all Mapped required information required for the transport of to 1.1 Dangerous Goods.
7
Mapped to 4.1
Demonstrate the ability to plan the route selecting suitable roads taking the safest and quickest route.
Demonstrate the ability to inspect the load restraint system for defects and damages that will impact on Mapped the ability to provide adequate methods of restraint as to 2.3 per the Load Restrain guide.
9
Mapped to 5.2
Demonstrates the ability to complete required documentation for loads containing dangerous goods in line with regulatory requirements.

to 3.3
3 X
to 3.2
3
Mapped to 1.3
4
Mapped to 1.5
7
Mapped to 4.1
9
Mapped to 5.2

to 3.3
3 X
to 3.2
3
Mapped to 1.3
4
Mapped to 1.5
7
Mapped to 4.1
9
Mapped to 5.2

to 3.3
to 3.2
3
Mapped to 1.3
4
Mapped to 1.5
7
Mapped to 4.1
9
Mapped to 5.2

to 3.3
to 3.2
3
Mapped to 1.3
4
Mapped to 1.5
7
Mapped to 4.1
9
Mapped to 5.2

Evaluation of Training and Assessment

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Evaluation of Training and Assessment

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Evaluation of

Training and Assessment

XXXX Transport, Victoria

Pre Training Self Assessments (Employee)

5 Excellent Understanding or Experience

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

2.3 2.4 3.1

3.3 3.4 4.1

Mapped To Element and Criteria

Individual Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

Group Average Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

5 Excellent Understanding or Experience

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

2.3 2.4 3.1

3.3 3.4 4.1

Mapped To Element and Criteria

Individual Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

Group Average Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

5 Excellent Understanding or Experience

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

2.3 2.4 3.1

3.3 3.4 4.1

Mapped To Element and Criteria

Individual Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

Group Average Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

5 Excellent Understanding or Experience

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

2.3 2.4 3.1

3.3 3.4 4.1

Mapped To Element and Criteria

Individual Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

Group Average Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

5 Excellent Understanding or Experience

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

2.3 2.4 3.1

3.3 3.4 4.1

Mapped To Element and Criteria

Individual Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

Group Average Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

Post Training Self Assessments (Employee)

5 Excellent Understanding or Experience

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

2.3 2.4 3.1

3.3 3.4 4.1

Mapped To Element and Criteria

Individual Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

Group Average Pre Training Self Assessment Response Data

Some Little 20% No

5 Excellent Understanding or Experience

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

2.3 2.4 3.1

3.3 3.4 4.1

Class or Division 2.1__

Class or Division 2.2_

Class or Division 2.3_

Class or Division 3___

Class or Division 4.1__

Class or Division _4.2____

Class or Division _5.1_____

Class or Division _5.2____

Class or Division _6.1_____

Class or Division _6.2____

Class or Division _7__

Class or Division _8__

Class or Division 2.1__

Class or Division 2.2_

Class or Division 2.3_