Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

12/5/2012

The Art of Designing Ductile Concrete in the Past 50 Years: The Impact of the PCA Book and Mete A. Sozen, Part 1
ACI WEB SESSIONS

ACI Fall 2012 Convention October 21 24, Toronto, ON

Sharon L. Wood, Robert L. Parker, Sr. Professor in Engineering and Chair, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin. Professor Wood is a fellow of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) and chaired its Technical Activities Committee between 2003 and 2006. She is also a member of the Structural Concrete Building Code Committee. She served on the ACI Board of Direction from 1997 through 2000 and as chair of the ACI Publications Committee from 1995 through 2002. In 1993 she received the Alfred Noble Award from the American Society of Civil Engineers for her paper Seismic Response of R/C Frames with Setbacks. She received the Arthur J. Boase Award from the Reinforced Concrete Research Council in 1998 in recognition of her research and teaching in the field of structural concrete, the Joe W. Kelly Award from the American Concrete Institute in 2002 in recognition of her dedication to improving the seismic behavior and design of reinforced concrete structures through the education of students and engineers, and the Henry L. Kennedy Award from the American Concrete Institute in 2006 for outstanding technical and administrative contributions to the Institute, particularly as a member of ACI Committee 318, Chair of the ACI Publications Committee, and Chair of the Technical Activities Committee. ACI WEB SESSIONS

PCA

Bearing Walls Infill Walls

DUCTILE DESIGN OF CONCRETE STRUCTURAL WALLS


Sharon L. Wood, University of Texas at Austin

PCA
Horizontal Reinforcement Spacing, in. #3 7 5 9 7 #4 13 10 16 13 Vertical Reinforcement Spacing, in. #3 12 9 12 12 #4 16 16 16 16

PCA

Wall Thickness, in. 6 8 10* 12*

* Spacing in each of two curtains.

12/5/2012

1964 Earthquake, Anchorage

Mt. McKinley Building


Constructed in 1952 14 Stories Exterior Bearing Walls Interior Core Walls

Mt. McKinley Building

Mt. McKinley Building

12/5/2012

PCA

Phase I 1976 Oesterle, Fiorato, Johal, Carpenter, Russell, Corley Phase II 1979 Oesterle, AristizabalOchoa, Fiorato, Russell, Corley
Earthquake Resistant Structural Walls Tests of Isolated Walls

Experimental Parameters
Parameter
Longitudinal Reinforcement Ratio Vertical Web Reinforcement Ratio Horizontal Web Reinforcement Ratio Axial Stress P Af c Aspect Ratio H w Lw Loading History

Range
1.1 to 6.0% 0.25 to 0.31% 0.31 to 1.38% 0.3 to 14.1% 2.4

Rectangular

Barbell

Flanged

Boundary Elements Rectangular Walls

Boundary Elements Barbell Walls

12/5/2012

Boundary Elements Flanged Walls

Nominal Capacity
Flexural Capacity, Vnf Shear Capacity, Vnv

Vnv 2 f c n f y Acv

Nominal Capacity, Vn = min (Vnf, Vnv)

1.5

Wall B1
Applied Force, kip

Flexural Failure

MaximumMeasuredBaseShear NominalBaseShearCapacity

1.0

Rectangular

Barbell

Flanged Top Deflection, in.

0.5

0.0
R1 R2 R3 R4 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 F1 F2 F3

Wall B3
Applied Force, kip

Flexural Failure

Wall B6
Applied Force, kip

Web Crushing

Top Deflection, in.

Top Deflection, in.

Shear Failure

12/5/2012

Wall B7
Applied Force, kip

Web Crushing

Consequences of Shear Failures


Web Crushing Shear-Compression Failure of Boundary Elements Concentration of Distortion near Base of Wall

Top Deflection, in.

Shear Failure

Shear Failures Occurred after Longitudinal Reinforcement Yielded.

200

200

NominalCapacityinShear,kip

150

NominalCapacityinShear,kip

150

100

100

Vnf Vnv
50

Vnf 0.6Vnv
50

FlexuralFailure ShearFailure
0 0 50 100 150 NominalCapacityinFlexure,kip 200 0 0

FlexuralFailure ShearFailure

50 100 150 NominalCapacityinFlexure,kip

200

12.0

V , psi 0.8 Lw h f c

8.0

Vtest fc Acv
4.0

Top Deflection, in.


FlexuralFailure ShearFailure

0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

MeanDriftRatio,%

X Maximum measured in last stable deflection increment

12/5/2012

Slender Walls Displacement Capacity

Slender Walls Shear Capacity

All test specimens were able to sustain multiple cycles to drift ratios exceeding 1%. Walls with confined boundary elements were able to sustain larger inelastic deformations. Walls that experienced web crushing sustained slightly lower maximum inelastic deformations. Maximum inelastic displacement did depend on loading history.

Average shear stress of 4 fc represented the boundary between flexural and shear failure mechanisms. If Vnf > 0.6 Vnv, shear failure was observed under cyclic lateral loads. Walls with low web reinforcement ratios are susceptible to degradation of shear strength with cycling.

Mt. McKinley Building

CFRP wrap was installed in 2006 and the building has been reoccupied.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen