Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Z value is used to find the corresponding
probability in Table A.1, Appendix A.
This should be VERY familiar from stats!! Here is one
way it is useful for managers!
Probability Analysis of a Project Network
We will use the table to find this part.
Then, add them together to get our answer.
Example 1: What is the probability that the
network will be completed in 30 weeks or less
This is p = 0.5000
What is the probability that the new order processing
system will be ready by 30 weeks?
Probability Analysis of a Project Network
Example 1
2
25
6.9
6.9 2.63
30 25
1.90
2.63
weeks
x
Z
Z
o
o
o
=
=
= =
= =
Z value of 1.90 corresponds to
probability of .4713 in Table A.1,
Appendix A.
Go down to the 1.9 row and over
to the 0.00 column
The probability of completing
project in 30 weeks or less:
(.5000 + .4713) = .9713.
Example 2: What is the probability the network
will be completed in 22 weeks or less?
This is p = 0.5000
The table tells us this probability.
So, take 0.5000 the probability in the table
A customer will trade elsewhere if the new ordering system is not
working within 22 weeks. What is the probability that she will be
retained?
First, convert the problem to a Z:
=
Z = (22 - 25)/2.63 = -1.14
Z value of 1.14 (ignore negative) corresponds to probability of .3729
in Table A.1, Appendix A.
1.1 row, 0.04 column
Probability that customer will be retained is .1271 = .5000 - .3729
Probability Analysis of a Project Network
Example 2
What if you are in a hurry?
Project duration can be reduced by assigning more
resources to project activities.
However, doing this increases project cost.
Decision is based on analysis of trade-off between time
and cost.
Project crashing is a method for shortening project
duration by reducing one or more critical activities to a
time less than normal activity time.
Project Crashing and
Time-Cost Trade-Off Overview
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
Example: Building a House (from start of lecture)
Activity #
Time in weeks
Lets assume that activity 1 costs $3000 for a 12 week completion time
It can be completed in 7 weeks (crash time) for $5000 (crash cost).
So, 5 weeks costs us $2000.
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
$2000
$400 /
5
Total Crash Cost
week
Total Crash Time weeks
= =
12 7 = 5
5000 3000 = 2000
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off:
You can do the same thing for each activity
You get these estimates from a contractor, someone else
=12-7
=2000/5
Network with normal activity times and weekly
crashing costs
As activities are crashed, the critical path may change and several paths
may become critical.
Here we can crash activity 1 without changing the path because all paths
will be equally affected.
This is normally done using a computer.
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
General Relationship of Time and Cost (1 of 2)
Another reason to crash a project is to lower indirect
costs
Project crashing costs and indirect costs have an inverse
relationship.
Crashing costs are highest when the project is
shortened.
Indirect costs increase as the project duration
increases.
The optimal project time is at the minimum point on the
total cost curve.
General Relationship of Time and Cost
General linear
programming model
with AOA convention
Lets look at an
example
The objective is to minimize the project duration (critical path time).
The CPM/PERT Network
Formulating as a Linear Programming Model
minimize
subject to
, for all activities
, 0
earliest event time of node
earliest event time of node
time of activity
i
i
j i ij
i j
i
j
ij
Z x
x x t i j
x x
where
x i
x j
t i j
=
>
>
=
=
=