0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
270 Ansichten2 Seiten
A understanding of evaluation as it relates to the teaching-learning environment is important. Most faculty members take little ownership of their responsibility in evaluation. Evaluation provides nurse educators with an avenue for demonstrating quality of teaching.
A understanding of evaluation as it relates to the teaching-learning environment is important. Most faculty members take little ownership of their responsibility in evaluation. Evaluation provides nurse educators with an avenue for demonstrating quality of teaching.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
A understanding of evaluation as it relates to the teaching-learning environment is important. Most faculty members take little ownership of their responsibility in evaluation. Evaluation provides nurse educators with an avenue for demonstrating quality of teaching.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Regardless of the institutional mission, all educational institutions have a focus
on teaching. Faculty members are also involved in evaluation of teaching, evaluation of their peers, and evaluation of the program. Therefore, a understanding of evaluation as it relates to the teaching-learning environment is important. Historically, quality of educational programs has been measured in terms of resources, program offerings, faculty qualifications, and student services; however, these definitions of quality are being challenged, and educators are being charged with the task of documenting program effectiveness in terms of learning.
Most faculty members take little ownership of their responsibility in evaluation;
however because evaluation provides nurse educators with an avenue for demonstrating quality of teaching, as well as the effectiveness of the educational program, all faculty members must understand their role in evaluation. Understanding the importance of evaluation is based on understanding the methodology and theory of evaluation as it relates to the faculty role.
Definition
• Traditionally defined as the process used in determining the value or worth of
something. • Involves collecting of data to determine if what is observed is different than what was expected. • Is conducted for the purpose of making decisions • The process used in determining the effectiveness of teaching and/or the value of a learning opportunity in assisting students to achieve the goals of education • Its inherent purpose is to provide valid data on which to make educational decisions related to the program of study
The goal of evaluation is synonymous with the definition of evaluation: to
determine the worth of something through collecting of data. Defining the goal involves specifying what is to be accomplished, what decisions need to be made. And who are the intended audience.
Roles of evaluation
• Depend on what that “something” is that is being evaluated and on whose
standards of value the results will be analyzed. • To provide faculty members with feedback concerning the effectiveness of their teaching Clarification of terms
The terms assessment of learning and measurement of learning are
sometimes used mistakenly instead of evaluation. Assessment of learning is defined as an appraisal of changes in learner knowledge, skills, attitudes, and ways of thinking and is the first step of the evaluation process in learning. assessment is different in evaluation is the process of making value judgments based on available and conclusions for the purpose of improvement or revision. Measurement is the process of assigning a quantitative or qualitative description to what is being evaluated. It helps with the value judgment by answering question of “how much.” The purpose of measurement is to provide a reference point on which to make value judgments on collected data. The concept of measurement in learning is extremely critical because we do not have a meter (machine) that attaches to the learner and tells us the level of learning that is occurring. Therefore, because this process is not observable, we must design a situation in which the desired behavior can be observed or assessed. This situation is termed measurement. It is a designed situation, thus the designer (evaluator) is making some assumptions that precede the development of that situation, the measurement is only a method of estimating what the learner has learned, and unfortunately is often imprecise. Therefore we must we must use more than one type of measurement in conducting evaluation.
The two major ways of interpreting test scores and other types of measurement used in evaluation: norm-referenced and criterion-referenced interpretation.
Norm-referenced interpretation: focuses on the learners results compare with those
of their peers. Norm-referenced data are reported in terms of percentiles, using relative standards and allow comparisons using group or national norms.
Criterion-referenced measurement: involves interpretation based on present
criteria, not in relation to another group. The focus is on the performance level of the learners and describes how ell the student performs in relation to the set of criteria.