Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Sheet 1 of 6 Rev B
Job Title ECSC Stainless Steel Valorisation Project
Department of Civil and Mining Engineering Subject Design Example 8 – Resistance to concentrated forces
Division of Steel Structures, University
campus, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden
Tel: +46 920 91 000
Fax: +46 920 91 913 Client Made by AO Date June 2002
CALCULATION SHEET ECSC Checked by AT Date Oct 2002
Revised by MEB Date April 2006
FEd = 110 kN
500
200
1250 1250
Structural analysis
Maximum shear and bending moment are obtained as
FEd 110
VEd = = = 55 kN
2 2
FEd L 110 × 2,5
MEd = = = 68,75 kNm
4 4
155
Job No. Sheet 2 of 6 Rev B
Job Title ECSC Stainless Steel Valorisation Project
Department of Civil and Mining Engineering Subject Design Example 8 – Resistance to concentrated forces
Division of Steel Structures, University
campus, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden
Tel: +46 920 91 000
Fax: +46 920 91 913 Client Made by AO Date June 2002
CALCULATION SHEET ECSC Checked by AT Date Oct 2002
Revised by MEB Date April 2006
Web, subject to bending Table 4.2
c 500 − 2 × 2 × 4
= = 175 > 74,8 , therefore the web is Class 4
tε 4 × 0,698
Flange, subject to compression Table 4.2
c 200 − 4 − 2 × 2 × 4
= = 11,0 ≤ 11,0 , therefore the compression flange is Class 3
tε 2 × 12 × 0,698
Thus, overall classification of cross-section is Class 4
Where
ss is the length of the stiff bearing and m1 and m2 are dimensionless parameters.
f yf bf
m1 = Eq. 5.25
f yw t w
2
hw
m2 = 0,02
for λ F > 0,5 Eq. 5.26a
tf
m2 = 0 for λ F ≤ 0,5 Eq. 5.26b
ss is conservatively taken as twice the thickness of the load bearing plate, i.e. 24 mm.
460 × 200 Eq. 5.25
m1 = = 50
460 × 4
156
Job No. Sheet 3 of 6 Rev B
Job Title ECSC Stainless Steel Valorisation Project
Department of Civil and Mining Engineering Subject Design Example 8 – Resistance to concentrated forces
Division of Steel Structures, University
campus, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden
Tel: +46 920 91 000
Fax: +46 920 91 913 Client Made by AO Date June 2002
CALCULATION SHEET ECSC Checked by AT Date Oct 2002
Revised by MEB Date April 2006
2 Eq. 5.26a
500
m2 = 0,02 × = 34,72 , assuming λ F > 0,5
12
Eq. 5.27
ly = 24 + 2 × 12 × 1 + 50 + 34,72 = 268,90 mm
Where
N Ed M Ed + N Ed e N prEN 1993-
η1 = + ≤ 1,0 1-5, Eq. 4.14
f y Aeff / γ M0 f y Weff / γ M0
157
Job No. Sheet 4 of 6 Rev B
Job Title ECSC Stainless Steel Valorisation Project
Department of Civil and Mining Engineering Subject Design Example 8 – Resistance to concentrated forces
Division of Steel Structures, University
campus, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden
Tel: +46 920 91 000
Fax: +46 920 91 913 Client Made by AO Date June 2002
CALCULATION SHEET ECSC Checked by AT Date Oct 2002
Revised by MEB Date April 2006
FEd prEN 1993-
η2 = ≤ 1,0 1-5, Eq. 6.14
f yw Leff t / γ M1
eeff =
1
Aeff ∑Ae i
i i =
1
Aeff
[ bf tf (0) + bf tf (hw + tf )] + [be1tw (0,5(be1 + tf ))
+ be2t w (0.5(hw + tf ) − be2 / 2) + (hw / 2 )t w (0,75hw + 0,5tf ) ] = 266,44 mm
158
Job No. Sheet 5 of 6 Rev B
Job Title ECSC Stainless Steel Valorisation Project
Department of Civil and Mining Engineering Subject Design Example 8 – Resistance to concentrated forces
Division of Steel Structures, University
campus, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden
Tel: +46 920 91 000
Fax: +46 920 91 913 Client Made by AO Date June 2002
CALCULATION SHEET ECSC Checked by AT Date Oct 2002
Revised by MEB Date April 2006
I eff
Weff = = 1,270 × 106 mm3
eeff + 0,5tf
68,75 × 106
η1 = = 0,129
460 × 1,270 × 106 / 1,1
110
η2 = = 0,920
119,63
0,8 × η1 + η2 = 0,8 × 0,129 + 0,920 = 1,023 < 1,4
Therefore, the resistance of the girder to interaction between concentrated load and
bending moment is adequate.
159
Job No. Sheet 6 of 6 Rev B
Job Title ECSC Stainless Steel Valorisation Project
Department of Civil and Mining Engineering Subject Design Example 8 – Resistance to concentrated forces
Division of Steel Structures, University
campus, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden
Tel: +46 920 91 000
Fax: +46 920 91 913 Client Made by AO Date June 2002
CALCULATION SHEET ECSC Checked by AT Date Oct 2002
Revised by MEB Date April 2006
Interaction between shear and bending
If η 3 does not exceed 0,5, the resistance to bending moment and axial force does not need
to be reduced to allow for shear
V Ed
η3 = ≤ 1,0 Eq. 5.23
V bw, Rd
55
= = 0,280 ≤ 0,5 , therefore interaction need not to be considered.
196,53
Concluding remarks
The resistance of the girder exceeds the load imposed. Note that the vertical stiffeners at
supports have not been checked. It should be done according to the procedure used in
Design Example 7.
160