Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
In 1996, geologic mapping of the Amite 1:100,000 quadrangle revealed an anomalous circular
depression, now called the “Brushy Creek feature” within southwestern St. Helena Parish,
Louisiana. The Brushy Creek feature consists of a circular depression about two kilometers in
diameter with a low and dissected rim. Petrographic study of sand from this feature revealed the
presence of both highly fractured and shocked quartz, not found in adjacent outcrops of the
Citronelle Formation.
A review of the regional geology of the area found no evidence of tectonic processes, e.g.,
volcanism and salt diapirism, which could account for the development of this depression. In
addition, the geomorphic setting of the Brushy Creek feature is incompatible with the develop-
ment of siliciclastic karst that has created similar depressions, e.g., the Carolina Bays. At this
time, the Brushy Creek feature is hypothesized to be a dissected late, possibly terminal, Pleis-
INTRODUCTION
Between 1996 to 1997, R. P. McCulloh, the author, and J. Snead of the Louisiana Geological
Survey compiled a draft geologic map of the Amite 1:100,000 quadrangle (McCulloh et al., 1997).
The preparation of this geologic map revealed an anomalous, 2-kilometer diameter, circular struc-
ture within the Greensburg 7.5-minute quadrangle, southwestern St. Helena Parish, Louisiana.
Because of resource constraints, this feature was not investigated further and was mapped as a
single polygon of “Quaternary undifferentiated.” For this study, the feature is named the “Brushy
Creek feature” for Brushy Creek, which has its headwaters within this circular depression.
Ridge and ravine topography, as defined by Hack (1960), characterizes the landscape of the
Citronelle Formation within the region of the Brushy Creek feature. The ridge and ravine topogra-
phy consists of alternating ridges and deeply incised valleys, which, except for the larger streams
and rivers, lack significant floodplains. Drainages within the region of the Brushy Creek feature
exhibit a rectilinear pattern that in many places consist of prominent lineaments. Regional relief of
the ridge and ravine topography is about 90 to 110 ft (27 to 34 m).
This is an erosionally graded, humid-climate landscape that is in dynamic equilibrium with the
erosional processes that formed and are modifying it. Except for the concordant summits of the
crests of major interfluves, all pre-existing constructional topography has been destroyed. Instead,
the variable resistance of local structure and lithology of the underlying bedrock control the loca-
tion and trend of drainages and ridges within ridge and ravine topography (Hack, 1960). Within the
region of the Brushy Creek feature, McCulloh (2002, 2003) discussed the presence of numerous,
prominent drainage alignments which he argued to be controlled by cryptic systematic fracturing
of the Citronelle Formation.
The Brushy Creek feature occurs as a noticeable circular “hole” within the ridge and ravine
topography that characterizes the surface of the Citronelle Formation within southeast Louisiana.
This feature is roughly circular with a relief of about 50 ft (15 m) and a diameter of about 1.2 miles
(2.0 km) (Fig. 1). The rim of the Brushy Creek feature exhibits a slight polygonal shape. The head-
waters of Brushy Creek have breached the southeast rim of the feature and the northern rim is
almost breached by a ravine tributary of Chandler Branch. The center of this feature lies at about
3405760N, 717870E, Zone 15, and 7 miles (11 km) southwest of Greensburg within St. Helena Parish,
Louisiana.
Erosion has sculpted regional ridge and ravine topography from fluvial sand and gravel of the
Citronelle Formation (Campbell, 1971; Mossa and Autin, 1989). In general, the Citronelle Formation
consists primarily of varegated and mottled, poorly sorted, fine to very coarse, sandy gravel, grav-
Figure 1. Portion of the Greensburg 7.5 topographic quadrangle illustrating topographic expression of Brushy
Creek feature. Open circles show location of samples associated with the Brushy Creek feature. “16SH”has
been dropped from sample numbers. For example, “”PD” is sample locality 16SHPD.
METHODOLOGY
An examination was made of the entire Brushy Creek feature with emphasis on the northern
third of the feature. The examination of the feature consisted of the description of exposures, exami-
nation of gravel found in streams draining the feature, and collection of samples from such loca-
tions.
Only one exposure, the Gehee Section, locality 16SHPC, revealed a complete section of the distal
rim of this feature. This exposure consists of an upper bed of 7 to 10 ft (2 to 3 m) of massive silty
sand and sandy silt. At about 5 ft (1.5 m) below the surface, a zone about 8 in (20 cm) thick contains
rounded, dime-size clasts of purple silty clay floating within a silty sand matrix. The purple color of
the silty clay clasts indicates that they came from the Citronelle Formation. Developed within the
upper part of the silty sand is the profile of the modern soil with pronounced A and B horizons. At
the base of the sandy silt and lying directly on the underlying Citronelle Formation, the exposure
contains a 5 to 12 in (13 to 30 cm) thick gravelly mud containing abundant rounded clasts com-
posed of mud, clay, and ironstone nodules. At this time, it is difficult to determine the origin of this
bed. Within the Gehee Section, the gravelly mud bed overlies highly fractured and cross-bedded
sand of the Citronelle Formation exposed within a ditch. It is deeply weathered saprolite. This unit
is highly oxidized and shows well-developed gleying of the sand along abundant fractures and root
molds. The Gehee Section is the only known exposure in which the Citronelle Formation is highly
fractured.
Samples were collected from locations within the Brushy Creek feature. North of and adjacent
to Louisiana State Highway 37, samples of the sediment composing the rim of the Brushy Creek
feature were collected from surface exposures at localities 16SHPC, 16SHPD, and 16SHPT, and from
an auger hole, locality 16SHPL. Within this auger hole, samples were taken at depths of 1.5, 3, and
RESULTS
All of the samples consisted of quartzarenite to sublitharenite sand containing about 90 to 95
percent quartz. The remaining percentage of sand grains consisted of chert, quartzite, iron oxide,
and heavy minerals. Feldspar and mica were not noted in any of these samples, except samples
from locality 16SHPD and the gravelly mud of 1ocality 16SHPC. All of the samples consisted of
subangular to well-rounded grains of sand. Unlike control samples, grains of sand in samples taken
within the Brushy Creek feature often exhibited ragged edges in thin section from the disintegration
of sand grains during processing.
Intensely fractured quartz was found in all of the samples collected from the rim and interior of
the Brushy Creek feature. The proportion of intensely fractured quartz varied from less than ten
percent to almost 100 percent of the quartz and chert sand. The sample with the least amount of
intensely fractured quartz came from the Citronelle Formation exposed at the Gehee Section, local-
ity 16SHPC. The sand from localities 16SHPD, 16SHPO, 16SHPP, 16SHPQ, and the gravelly mud in
the Gehee Section, consisted either entirely or almost entirely of intensely fractured grains. In
contrast, none of the control samples possessed the intensely fractured grains observed in samples
associated with the Brushy Creek feature.
Examination of thin sections revealed an abundance of intensely fractured quartz of types not
observed within the control samples collected from outside the feature. One type consists of quartz
Figure 2. Photomicrograph of thin section showing coarse, intensely fractured quartz sand from quartz from
gravelly mud in the Gehee Section, locality 16SHPC. Photomicrograph taken with cross-polarized light.
A unique and significant feature was noted in samples from two locations. Thin sections made
from sand collected from locality 16SHPA revealed quartz grains with sets of planar features.
Stephen Benoist (2003, per. commun.) noted that several of the grains exhibited closely spaced sets
of planar features in only one direction. In addition, a few of the quartz grains exhibited sets of
planar features in two different intersecting directions (Fig. 4). Examination of these grains by
Stephen Benoist (2003, per. commun.) revealed that the planar features averaged 45 degrees and 33
degrees, which respectively represent the {1012} and {1122} orientations. Planar features along both
orientations, as noted by Koerbel (1997) and Stoffler and Langenhorst (1994), are characteristic of
planar deformation features (PDF) created by shock metamorphism. The abundance of planar
features and shocked quartz within the sand from 16SHPA argue against their having been re-
worked from distant sources, e.g., Cretaceous - Tertiary boundary deposits, but rather suggest they
are derived from a nearby primary source, i.e., the Brushy Creek feature. Finally, the gravelly mud
overlying the Citronelle Formation in the Gehee Section contains an abundance of quartz with
similar planar features and fractures (Fig. 5) which are currently being study. In sharp contrast,
none of the sand in the eight samples of Citronelle Formation collected from outcrops within the
vicinity of the Brushy Creek feature contained such planar features or fractures.
Figure 3. Photomicrograph of thin section showing rectilinear fractures within coarse intensely fractured,
quartz sand from locality 16SHPD. “i” indicates fractures coated with iron oxides. Photomicrograph taken
with cross-polarized light.
Figure 4. Photomicrograph of thin section showing a coarse grain of shocked quartz from locality 16SHPA.
“i” indicates fractures and small cavities associated with PDFs filled with iron oxides. “A” indicates {1122}
oriented PDFs and “B” indicates {1012} oriented PDFs. Photomicrograph taken with cross-polarized light.
Figure 5. Photomicrograph of thin section showing planar features and fractures in a coarse grain of quartz
from gravelly mud in the Gehee Section, locality 16SHPC. “i” indicates iron oxide along planar features and
fractures. “p” indicates other planar fractures. Photomicrograph taken with cross-polarized light.
In addition to their orientation and parallelism, the planar features show preferential etching as
a result of intensive weathering of the quartz grains. This etching has created cavities along these
planar features that have become filled with pedogenic iron oxides (Figs 4 and 5). Just as amor-
phous silica associated with PDFs is revealed by etching with hydrofluoric acid, weathering has
naturally etched these grains along planar features and filled the resulting cavities with iron oxides.
The natural etching of these planar features strongly suggests that they are PDFs from which
weathering has removed amorphous silica.
Small percentages of orthoclase, plagioclase, and mica were found in thin sections of unproc-
essed samples from 16SHPD and gravelly mud of locality 16SHPC. The feldspar and micas were
deeply weathered and corroded from post-depositional weathering In contrast, all of the control
samples taken from the Citronelle Formation lacked any feldspar or mica.
One material, which was searched for and not found, was highly weathered, “terrestrialized,”
fragments of meteorites called “iron shale.” Despite studying dozens of pieces of ironstone gravel
from streams draining the Brushy Creek feature and the gravelly mud layer, none of this material
could be identified as “iron shale.”
DISCUSSION
The mechanisms capable of producing a circular feature like the Brushy Creek feature are
diapirism, volcanism, siliciclastic karst, and meteorite impact cratering. Any relationship to salt
diapirism can be dismissed, because the Brushy Creek feature lies within a portion of the Louisiana
Coastal Plain underlain by extremely thin Louann Salt (Sawyer et al. 1991). Within this area, the
CONCLUSIONS
The preliminary study of a rimmed, circular depression, which is about 1.2 miles (2 km) in
diameter, within St. Helena Parish, Louisiana, resulted in the hypothesis that it is a crater resulting
from a hypervelocity meteorite or comet impact. The Brushy Creek feature is a regionally unique
landform superimposed upon the local ridge and ravine topography. This circular feature occurs in
an area devoid of volcanic activity, salt diapirism, and carbonate sinkholes that might explain its
origin. Furthermore, its location is incompatible with the formation of siliciclastic karst. Limited
subsurface data indicate the presence of a “hole” in the underlying stratigraphic units consistent
with the origin of the Brushy Creek feature by impact processes. Finally, the presence of shocked
quartz provides direct evidence of impact metamorphism. Impact processes are further suggested
by abundant intensely fractured quartz within the sediments comprising its rim.
At this time, the Louisiana Geological survey is preparing for further research of the Brushy
Creek feature. The author, Douglas Carlson, and Richard P. McCulloh are considering studying the
internal structure of the Brushy Creek feature using various geophysical techniques, including
magnetic and seismic surveys. Plans to use a Giddings soil probe to acquire cores and prepare a
shallow cross-section across this feature are under consideration. The silty and sandy composition
of rim of the Brushy Creek feature indicate that Ground Penetrating Radar might produce useful
cross-sections of the rim when ground truthed by cores from a Giddings rig. Finally, Stephen
Benoist (Louisiana State University) and the author are planning to examine the petrographic
characteristics of shock metamorphosed sediment associated with this feature.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The initial discovery of the Brushy Creek feature was made in the course of geologic mapping
funded by the United States Geological Survey STATEMAP program under cooperative agreement
1434-HQ-96-AG-01490. Additional work on this study was conducted with the encouragement and
support of Chacko John, Director of the Louisiana Geological Survey (LGS). I thank David T. King,
Jr., Donald R. Lowe, Don Johnson, W. Feathergale Wilson, and Richard P. McCulloh for their discus-
sions, advice, and encouragement. I also thank Christian Koerbel, Scott Harris, and Stephen Benoist
for technical advice regarding shocked quartz. I greatly appreciate the comments made by the two
geologists who reviewed this paper for publication.
I thank Xiaogang Xie for use of the photomicroscope at the LSU Department of Geology and
Geophysics SEM and Electron Microprobe Laboratory. I thank Rick Young for the preparation of
several thin sections. I am grateful to National Petrographic Services, Inc for high-quality thin
sections that proved to be essential to my research. Finally, I am very grateful to the Kentwood
Brick and Tile Company, William A. Gehee of Greensburg, Louisiana, and Soterra LLC, inc., Jack-
son, Mississippi for access to their property.
REFERENCES
Bebout, D. G., and D. R. Gutierrez, 1983, Regional cross sections Louisiana Gulf Coast {eastern part}: Louisiana
Geological Survey Folio series. no. 6., 11 p.
Byerly, G. R., 1991, Igneous activity, in A. Salvador, ed., The Gulf of Mexico Basin: Geological Society of America
Decade of North American Geology, Geology of North America, v. J, p. 91-108.
Campbell, C. L., 1971, The gravel deposits of St. Helena and Tangipahoa parishes: Ph.D. Dissertation. Department
of Geology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, 295 p.
Corcoran, M. K., 1993, The lower Tuscaloosa Formation in the Greensburg Field and Joseph Branch Field areas, St.
Helena Parish, Louisiana: Master’s thesis. Department of Geology, University of Southern Mississippi,
Hattiesburg, MS, 83 p.
Corcoran. M. K., C. P. Cameron, and M. A. Meylan, 1993, The lower Tuscaloosa Formation in the Greensburg
Field and Joseph Branch Field areas, St. Helena Parish, Louisiana: Gulf Coast Association of Geological
Societies Transactions. v. 43, p. 87-96.
Folk, R. L., 1980, Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill Publishing Company. 184 p.
Hack, J. T., 1960, Interpretation of erosional topography in humid temperate regions: American Journal of Science.
v. 258-A, p. 80-97.
Howe, H. J., 1962, Subsurface geology of St. Helena, Tangipahoa, Washington and St. Tammany parishes, Louisi-
ana. Transactions of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies. v. 7, pp. 121-135.
Kieffer , S. W., 1971, I. Shock metamorphism of the Coconino Sandstone at Meteor Crater, Arizona. II. Specific
heat of solids of geophysical interest: Ph.D. Dissertation. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena,
California, p. 191.
Koerbel, C., 1997, Impact cratering: the mineralogical and geochemical evidence. , in K. s. Johnson and J. A.
Campbell, eds., Ames Structure in Northwest Oklahoma and Similar Features: origin and Petroleum Produc-
tion (1995 Symposium): Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular, no. 100, p. 30-54.
McCulloh, R. P., 2002, Patterns of streams of Louisiana: Louisiana Geological Survey News. v. 12, no. 1, p. 1-2.
McCulloh, R. P., 2003, The stream net as an indicator of cryptic systematic fracturing in Louisiana: Southeastern
Geology, in press.
McCulloh, R. P., Heinrich, P., and Snead, J., compilers, 1997, Amite, Louisiana 30 x 60 minute geologic quadrangle
(preliminary): Prepared in cooperation with U.S. Geological Survey, STATEMAP program, under cooperative
agreement no. 1434-HQ-96-AG-01490, 1:100,000-scale map plus explanation and notes.
May, J. H., and A. G. Warne, 1999, Hydrologic and geochemical factors required for the development of Carolina
Bays along the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain, U.S.A. Engineering Geology. v. 5, p. 261-270.
Mossa, J., and W. J. Autin, 1989, Quaternary geomorphology and stratigraphy of the Florida parishes, southeast-
ern Louisiana. Louisiana Geological Survey Guidebook Series no. 5, 98 p.
Otvos, I. G., Jr., 1976, “Pseudokarst” and “ pseudokarst terrains”: problems of terminology. Geological Society of
America Bulletin. v. 87, p. 1021-1027.
Otvos, I. G., Jr., 1997, Northeastern Gulf of Mexico Plain revisited Neogene and Quaternary units and events - old
and new concepts. New Orleans Geological Society, New Orleans, Louisiana, 143 p.
Sawyer, D. S., R. T. Buffler, and R. H. Pilger, Jr., 1991, The crust under the Gulf of Mexico Basin, in A. Salvador, ed.,
The Gulf of Mexico Basin: Geological Society of America Decade of North American Geology, Geology of
North America, v. J, p. 53-73.
Shoemaker, E. M., and S. W. Kieffer, 1979, Guidebook to the Geology of Meteor Crater, Arizona: Publication No.
17, Center for Meteorite Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 65 p.
Stoffler, D., and F. Langenhorst. 1994. Shock metamorphism of quartz in nature and experiment. 1. Basic observa-
tion and theory: Meteoritics. v. 29, p. 155-181.