Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Ps persective:
I. T.J (rem, quasi, pj)
1) Non res D- actual physical present in State when served.
2) Consented/waived Ter. Jur.
a. Forum selection clause
b. Consent by agreeing to TJ
c. non-compliance with court, TJ established by sanction
3) Resident4) Long arm statute- (ignore if D in state) (1)
a. Due process/enumerated acts
a. Minimum contacts (2)
1. Specific Jur. (3)
a. purposeful availment
1. serve the market/ stream of commerce
2. In state activity
3. effects test (knowingly causing injury in
forum)
4. D enters into K with resident in forum.
(burger king)
2. General Jur. (3)
-Systematic and continuous
b. fairness (4)
1. Ds burden
2. Ps interest
3. forums interest
4. efficient resolution of controversy
5. substantive social policies
Ib. Notice/Service (5)
a. Service as reqd by rules
b. Mullane standardII. SMJ
A. Constitutional authority- case or controversy under federal law or
minimum diversity.
1. Article III
a. Arising out of the constitution
b. laws
c. treaties
B. Statutory authority1. fed Q
a. well pleaded complaint rule
1. Holmes test
2. Substantial federal issue test
2. Div.- complete diversity
a. citizenship analysis of individuals (domicile)
b. citizenship analysis of corporations
1. place of Incorporation
2. Principle place of business (both)
a. nerve center
b. primary operations
c. citizenship analysis of unincorporated associations
d. aliensIII. Venue
1. Local actions
2. Transatory actions 1391/1392
a. In any district where a D resides, as long as all D reside in same
state
b. In a district where a substantial part of the event s or omissions
giving rise to the claim occurred.
c. any district where any D is subject to TJ
d. in any federal district where an alien is sued.
e. in any federal district where a corp is subject to PJ.
IV. Joindera. additional claims
b. additional parties
Bulge jur established over Ds impleaded in fed suit under 14 & 19 when
served within 100 miles of district court.
V. Preclusion-other claims may be lost(Res judicata/ collateral estoppel)
-claims that were brought or could have been brought
VI. Erie-RDA
1. Purely substantive issue
-Fed must always apply state law to substantive issues.
2. Procedural Controlled by statute or FRCP
a. FRCP-fed rule wins out if
1. valid within REA
2. Constitutional
b. Federal procedural statute
1. Constitutional
3. Eerie Erie-doesnt fit into other two prongs.
a. Bound up in rights and obligations of parties?
1. Rights (State)
2. Remedy (Hanna Mod. Outcome test)
b. Hanna Modified outcome test
1. Modifies (Byrd Balancing)
2. Does not modify (Federal practice applies)
c. Byrd balancing test- are there countervailing federal considerations
that outweigh state interest?
1. Yes (Fed baby)
2. no (The states win)
VII. Complaint
A. Allegation of Jur
B. Stmt of the claim