Control Management

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Controlling is one of the managerial functions like planning, organizing, staffing and directing. It is an important function because it helps to check the errors and to take the corrective action so that deviation from standards are minimized and stated goals of the organization are achieved in a desired manner. According to modern concepts, control is a foreseeing action hereas earlier concept of control as used only hen errors ere detected. !ontrol in management means setting standards, measuring actual performance and taking corrective action.

Definitions
In "#"$, %enri Fayol formulated one of the first definitions of control as it pertains to management: Control of an undertaking consists of seeing that everything is being carried out in accordance with the plan which has been adopted, the orders which have been given, and the principles which have been laid down. Its object is to point out mistakes in order that they may be rectified and prevented from recurring.&"' According to (F) *reach: Control is checking current performance against pre-determined standards contained in the plans, with a view to ensure adequate progress and satisfactory performance. According to %arold +oontz: Controlling is the measurement and correction of performance in order to make sure that enterprise objectives and the plans devised to attain them are accomplished. According to ,tafford *eer: anagement is the profession of control. -obert J. .ockler presented a more comprehensive definition of managerial control: anagement control can be defined as a systematic effort by business management to compare performance to predetermined standards, plans, or objectives in order to determine whether performance is in line with these standards and presumably in order to take any remedial action required to see that human and other corporate resources are being used in the most effective and efficient way possible in achieving corporate objectives.&/'

Also control can be defined as !that function of the system that adjusts operations as needed to achieve the plan, or to maintain variations from system objectives within allowable limits!. 0he control subsystem functions in close harmony ith the operating system. 0he degree to hich they interact depends on the nature of the operating system and its ob1ectives. ,tability concerns a system2s ability to maintain a pattern of output ithout ide fluctuations. -apidity of response pertains to the speed ith hich a system can correct variations and return to e3pected output.&4' A political election can illustrate the concept of control and the importance of feedback. (ach party organizes a campaign to get its candidate selected and outlines a plan to inform the public about both the candidate2s credentials and the party2s platform. As the election nears, opinion polls furnish feedback about the effectiveness of the campaign and about each candidate2s chances to in. 5epending on the nature of this feedback, certain ad1ustments in strategy and6or tactics can be made in an attempt to achieve the desired result. From these definitions it can be stated that there is close link bet een planning and controlling. 7lanning is a process by hich an organisation2s ob1ectives and the methods to achieve the ob1ectives are established, and controlling is a process hich measures and directs the actual performance against the planned goals of the organisation. 0hus, goals and ob1ectives are often referred to as siamese t ins of management. the managerial function of management and correction of performance in order to make sure that enterprise ob1ectives and the goals devised to attain them being accomplished.

Characteristics

!ontrol is a continuous process !ontrol is a management process !ontrol is embedded in each level of organizational hierarchy !ontrol is for ard looking !ontrol is closely linked ith planning !ontrol is a tool for achieving organizational activities !ontrol is an end process !ontrol compares actual performance ith planned performance

Elements
0he four basic elements in a control system: ". the characteristic or condition to be controlled /. the sensor 4. the comparator 8. the activator

occur in the same se9uence and maintain a consistent relationship to each other in every system.
&4'

0he first element is the characteristic or condition of the operating system hich is to be measured. We select a specific characteristic because a correlation e3ists bet een it and ho the system is performing. 0he characteristic can be the output of the system during any stage of processing or it may be a condition that is the result of the system. For e3ample, it may be the heat energy produced by the furnace or the temperature in the room hich has changed because of the heat generated by the furnace. In an elementary school system, the hours a teacher orks or the gain in kno ledge demonstrated by the students on a national e3amination are e3amples of characteristics that may be selected for measurement, or control. 0he second element of control, the sensor, is a means for measuring the characteristic or condition. For e3ample, in a home heating system this device ould be the thermostat, and in a 9uality:control system this measurement might be performed by a visual inspection of the product. 0he third element of control, the comparator, determines the need for correction by comparing hat is occurring ith hat has been planned. ,ome deviation from plan is usual and e3pected, but hen variations are beyond those considered acceptable, corrective action is re9uired. It involves a sort of preventative action hich indicates that good control is being achieved. 0he fourth element of control, the activator, is the corrective action taken to return the system to e3pected output. 0he actual person, device, or method used to direct corrective inputs into the operating system may take a variety of forms. It may be a hydraulic controller positioned by a solenoid or electric motor in response to an electronic error signal, an employee directed to re ork the parts that failed to pass 9uality inspection, or a school principal ho decides to buy additional books to provide for an increased number of students. As long as a plan is performed ithin allo able limits, corrective action is not necessary; ho ever, this seldom occurs in practice. Information is the medium of control, because the flo of sensory data and later the flo of corrective information allo a characteristic or condition of the system to be controlled. 0o illustrate ho information flo facilitates control, let us revie the elements of control in the conte3t of information.&8'

Relationship between the elements of control and information

Controlled characteristic or condition 0he primary re9uirement of a control system is that it maintain the level and kind of output necessary to achieve the system2s ob1ectives.&<' It is usually impractical to control every feature and condition associated ith the system2s output. 0herefore, the choice of the controlled item =and appropriate information about it> is e3tremely important. 0here should be a direct correlation bet een the controlled item and the system2s operation. In other ords, control of the selected characteristic should have a direct relationship to the goal or ob1ective of the system.

Sensor After the characteristic is sensed, or measured, information pertinent to control is fed back. (3actly hat information needs to be transmitted and also the language that ill best facilitate the communication process and reduce the possibility of distortion in transmission must be carefully considered. Information that is to be compared ith the standard, or plan, should be e3pressed in the same terms or language as in the original plan to facilitate decision making. ?sing machine methods =computers> may re9uire e3tensive translation of the information. ,ince optimal languages for computation and for human revie are not al ays the same, the relative ease of translation may be a significant factor in selecting the units of measurement or the language unit in the sensing element. In many instances, the measurement may be sampled rather than providing a complete and continuous feedback of information about the operation. A sampling procedure suggests measuring some segment or portion of the operation that ill represent the total.&/' Comparison with standard In a social system, the norms of acceptable behavior become the standard against hich so: called deviant behavior may be 1udged. -egulations and la s provide a more formal collection of information for society. ,ocial norms change, but very slo ly. In contrast, the standards outlined by a formal la can be changed from one day to the ne3t through revision, discontinuation, or replacement by another. Information about deviant behavior becomes the basis for controlling social activity. @utput information is compared ith the standard or norm and significant deviations are noted. In an industrial e3ample, fre9uency distribution =a tabulation of the number of times a given characteristic occurs ithin the sample of products being checked> may be used to sho the average 9uality, the spread, and the comparison of output ith a standard. If there is a significant and uncorrectable difference bet een output and plan, the system is Aout of control.A 0his means that the ob1ectives of the system are not feasible in relation to the capabilities of the present design. (ither the ob1ectives must be reevaluated or the system redesigned to add ne capacity or capability. For e3ample, the traffic in drugs has been increasing in some cities at an alarming rate. 0he citizens must decide hether to revise the police system so as to regain control, or hether to modify the la to reflect a different norm of acceptable behavior. Implimentor 0he activator unit responds to the information received from the comparator and initiates corrective action. If the system is a machine:to:machine system, the corrective inputs =decision rules> are designed into the net ork. When the control relates to a man:to:machine or man:to: man system, ho ever, the individual=s> in charge must evaluate ="> the accuracy of the feedback information, =/> the significance of the variation, and =4> hat corrective inputs ill restore the system to a reasonable degree of stability. @nce the decision has been made to direct ne inputs into the system, the actual process may be relatively easy. A small amount of energy can change

the operation of 1et airplanes, automatic steel mills, and hydroelectric po er plants. 0he pilot presses a button, and the landing gear of the airplane goes up or do n; the operator of a steel mill pushes a lever, and a ribbon of hite:hot steel races through the plant; a orker at a control board directs the flo of electrical energy throughout a regional net ork of stations and substations. It takes but a small amount of control energy to release or stop large 9uantities of input.&8' 0he comparator may be located far from the operating system, although at least some of the elements must be in close pro3imity to operations. For e3ample, the measurement =the sensory element> is usually at the point of operations. 0he measurement information can be transmitted to a distant point for comparison ith the standard =comparator>, and hen deviations occur, the correcting input can be released from the distant point. %o ever, the input =activator> ill be located at the operating system. 0his ability to control from afar means that aircraft can be flo n by remote control, dangerous manufacturing processes can be operated from a safe distance, and national organizations can be directed from centralized head9uarters.

Process

,etting performance standards. .easurement of actual performance. !omparing actual performance ith standards

Kinds
!ontrol may be grouped according to three general classifications:&4' ". the nature of the information flo designed into the system =open: or closed:loop control> /. the kind of components included in the design =man or machine control systems> 4. the relationship of control to the decision process =organizational or operational control>.

Open- and closed-loop control

A street:lighting system controlled by a timing device is an e3ample of an open:loop system. At a certain time each evening, a mechanical device closes the circuit and energy flo s through the electric lines to light the lamps. Bote, ho ever, that the timing mechanism is an independent unit and is not measuring the ob1ective function of the lighting system. If the lights should be needed on a dark, stormy day the timing device ould not recognize this need and therefore ould not activate energy inputs. !orrective properties may sometimes be built into the controller =for e3ample, to modify the time the lights are turned on as the days gro shorter or longer>, but this ould not close the loop. In another instance, the sensing, comparison, or ad1ustment may be made through action taken by an individual ho is not part of the system. For e3ample, the lights may be turned on by someone ho happens to pass by and recognizes the need for additional light.

If control is e3ercised as a result of the operation rather than because of outside or predetermined arrangements, it is a closed:loop system. 0he home thermostat is the classic e3ample of a control device in a closed:loop system. When the room temperature drops belo the desired point, the control mechanism closes the circuit to start the furnace and the temperature rises. 0he furnace: activating circuit is turned off as the temperature reaches the preselected level. 0he significant difference bet een this type of system and an open:loop system is that the control device is an element of the system it serves and measures the performance of the system. In other ords, all four control elements are integral to the specific system. An essential part of a closed:loop system is feedback; that is, the output of the system is measured continually through the item controlled, and the input is modified to reduce any difference or error to ard zero. .any of the patterns of information flo in organizations are found to have the nature of closed loops, hich use feedback. 0he reason for such a condition is apparent hen one recognizes that any system, if it is to achieve a predetermined goal, must have available to it at all times an indication of its degree of attainment. In general, every goal:seeking system employs feedback.&4'

Man and machine control

0he elements of control are easy to identify in machine systems. For e3ample, the characteristic to be controlled might be some variable like speed or temperature, and the sensing device could be a speedometer or a thermometer. An e3pectation of precision e3ists because the characteristic is 9uantifiable and the standard and the normal variation to be e3pected can be described in e3act terms. In automatic machine systems, inputs of information are used in a process of continual ad1ustment to achieve output specifications. When even a small variation from the standard occurs, the correction process begins. 0he automatic system is highly structured, designed to accept certain kinds of input and produce specific output, and programmed to regulate the transformation of inputs ithin a narro range of variation.&$' For an illustration of mechanical control: as the load on a steam engine increases and the engine starts to slo do n, the regulator reacts by opening a valve that releases additional inputs of steam energy. 0his ne input returns the engine to the desired number of revolutions per minute. 0his type of mechanical control is crude in comparison to the more sophisticated electronic control systems in everyday use. !onsider the comple3 missile:guidance systems that measure the actual course according to predetermined mathematical calculations and make almost instantaneous corrections to direct the missile to its target. .achine systems can be comple3 because of the sophisticated technology, hereas control of people is comple3 because the elements of control are difficult to determine. In human control systems, the relationship bet een ob1ectives and associated characteristics is often vague; the measurement of the characteristic may be e3tremely sub1ective; the e3pected standard is difficult to define; and the amount of ne inputs re9uired is impossible to 9uantify. 0o illustrate, let us refer once more to a formalized social system in hich deviant behavior is controlled through a process of observed violation of the e3isting la =sensing>, court hearings and trials =comparison ith standard>, incarceration hen the accused is found guilty =correction>, and release from custody after rehabilitation of the individual has occurred.&$'

0he speed limit established for free ay driving is one standard of performance that is 9uantifiable, but even in this instance, the degree of permissible variation and the amount of the actual variation are often a sub1ect of disagreement bet een the patrolman and the suspected violator. 0he comple3ity of our society is reflected in many of our la s and regulations, hich establish the general standards for economic, political, and social operations. A citizen may not kno or understand the la and conse9uently ould not kno hether or not he as guilty of a violation. .ost organized systems are some combination of man and machine; some elements of control may be performed by machine hereas others are accomplished by man. In addition, some standards may be precisely structured hereas others may be little more than general guidelines ith ide variations e3pected in output. .an must act as the controller hen measurement is sub1ective and 1udgment is re9uired. .achines such as computers are incapable of making e3ceptions from the specified control criteria regardless of ho much a particular case might arrant special consideration. A pilot acts in con1unction ith computers and automatic pilots to fly large 1ets. In the event of une3pected eather changes, or possible collision ith another plane, he must intercede and assume direct control.&8'

Organizational and operational control

0he concept of organizational control is implicit in the bureaucratic theory of .a3 Weber. Associated ith this theory are such concepts as Aspan of controlA, Acloseness of supervisionA, and Ahierarchical authorityA. Weber2s vie tends to include all levels or types of organizational control as being the same. .ore recently, riters have tended to differentiate the control process bet een that hich emphasizes the nature of the organizational or systems design and that hich deals ith daily operations. 0o illustrate the difference, e AevaluateA the performance of a system to see ho effective and efficient the design proved to be or to discover hy it failed. In contrast, e operate and AcontrolA the system ith respect to the daily inputs of material, information, and energy. In both instances, the elements of feedback are present, but organizational control tends to revie and evaluate the nature and arrangement of components in the system, hereas operational control tends to ad1ust the daily inputs. 0he direction for organizational control comes from the goals and strategic plans of the organization. Ceneral plans are translated into specific performance measures such as share of the market, earnings, return on investment, and budgets. 0he process of organizational control is to revie and evaluate the performance of the system against these established norms. -e ards for meeting or e3ceeding standards may range from special recognition to salary increases or promotions. @n the other hand, a failure to meet e3pectations may signal the need to reorganize or redesign.&D' In organizational control, the approach used in the program of revie and evaluation depends on the reason for the evaluation E that is, is it because the system is not effective "accomplishing its objectives#$ Is the system failing to achieve an e%pected standard of efficiency$ Is the evaluation being conducted because of a breakdown or failure in operations$ Is it merely a periodic audit-and-review process$

When a system has failed or is in great difficulty, special diagnostic techni9ues may be re9uired to isolate the trouble areas and to identify the causes of the difficulty. It is appropriate to investigate areas that have been troublesome before or areas here some measure of performance can be 9uickly identified. For e3ample, if an organization2s output backlog builds rapidly, it is logical to check first to see if the problem is due to such readily obtainable measures as increased demand or to a drop in available man hours. When a more detailed analysis is necessary, a systematic procedure should be follo ed.&D' In contrast to organizational control, operational control serves to regulate the day:to:day output relative to schedules, specifications, and costs. Is the output of product or service the proper quality and is it available as scheduled$ &re inventories of raw materials, goods-inprocess, and finished products being purchased and produced in the desired quantities$ &re the costs associated with the transformation process in line with cost estimates$ Is the information needed in the transformation process available in the right form and at the right time$ Is the energy resource being utilized efficiently$ 0he most difficult task of management concerns monitoring the behavior of individuals, comparing performance to some standard, and providing re ards or punishment as indicated. ,ometimes this control over people relates entirely to their output. For e3ample, a manager might not be concerned ith the behavior of a salesman as long as sales ere as high as e3pected. In other instances, close supervision of the salesman might be appropriate if achieving customer satisfaction ere one of the sales organization2s main ob1ectives. 0he larger the unit, the more likely that the control characteristic ill be related to some output goal. It also follo s that if it is difficult or impossible to identify the actual output of individuals, it is better to measure the performance of the entire group. 0his means that individuals2 levels of motivation and the measurement of their performance become sub1ective 1udgments made by the supervisor. !ontrolling output also suggests the difficulty of controlling individuals2 performance and relating this to the total system2s ob1ectives.&D'

Problems
0he perfect plan could be outlined if every possible variation of input could be anticipated and if the system ould operate as predicted. 0his kind of planning is neither realistic, economical, nor feasible for most business systems. If it ere feasible, planning re9uirements ould be so comple3 that the system ould be out of date before it could be operated. 0herefore, e design control into systems. 0his re9uires more thought in the systems design but allo s more fle3ibility of operations and makes it possible to operate a system using unpredictable components and undetermined input. ,till, the design and effective operation of control are not ithout problems. 0he ob1ective of the system is to perform some specified function. 0he ob1ective of organizational control is to see that the specified function is achieved. 0he ob1ective of operational control is to ensure that variations in daily output are maintained ithin prescribed limits.

It is one thing to design a system that contains all of the elements of control, and 9uite another to make it operate true to the best ob1ectives of design. @perating Ain controlA or A ith planA does not guarantee optimum performance. For e3ample, the plan may not make the best use of the inputs of materials, energy, or information E in other ords, the system may not be designed to operate efficiently. ,ome of the more typical problems relating to control include the difficulty of measurement, the problem of timing information flo , and the setting of proper standards.&D' When ob1ectives are not limited to 9uantitative output, the measurement of system effectiveness is difficult to make and subse9uently perple3ing to evaluate. .any of the characteristics pertaining to output do not lend themselves to 9uantitative measurement. 0his is true particularly hen inputs of human energy cannot be related directly to output. 0he same situation applies to machines and other e9uipment associated ith human involvement, hen output is not in specific units. In evaluating man:machine or human:oriented systems, psychological and sociological factors obviously do not easily translate into 9uantifiable terms. 'or e%ample, how does mental fatigue affect the quality or quantity of output$ &nd, if it does, is mental fatigue a function of the lack of a challenging assignment or the fear of a potential injury$ ,ub1ective inputs may be transferred into numerical data, but there is al ays the danger of an incorrect appraisal and transfer, and the danger that the analyst may assume undue confidence in such data after they have been 9uantified. )et us suppose, for e3ample, that the decisions made by an e3ecutive are rated from " to "F, "F being the perfect decision. After determining the ranking for each decision, adding these, and dividing by the total number of decisions made, the average ranking ould indicate a particular e3ecutive2s score in his decision:making role. @n the basis of this score, 1udgments E hich could be 9uite erroneous E might be made about his decision:making effectiveness. @ne e3ecutive ith a ranking of $.D< might be considered more effective than another ho had a ranking of $./<, and yet the t o managers may have made decisions under different circumstances and conditions. (3ternal factors over hich neither e3ecutive had any control may have influenced the difference in AeffectivenessA.&D' Guantifying human behavior, despite its e3treme difficulty, sub1ectivity, and imprecision in relation to measuring physical characteristics is the most prevalent and important measurement made in large systems. 0he behavior of individuals ultimately dictates the success or failure of every man:made system.

Information flow

@scillation and Feedback Another problem of control relates to the improper timing of information introduced into the feedback channel. Improper timing can occur in both computerized and human control systems, either by mistakes in measurement or in 1udgment. 0he more rapid the system2s response to an error signal, the more likely it is that the system could overad1ust; yet the need for prompt action is important because any delay in providing corrective input could also be crucial. A system generating feedback inconsistent ith current need ill tend to fluctuate and ill not ad1ust in the desired manner. 0he most serious problem in information flo arises hen the delay in feedback is e3actly one: half cycle, for then the corrective action is superimposed on a variation from norm hich, at that moment, is in the same direction as that of the correction. 0his causes the system to overcorrect, and then if the reverse ad1ustment is made out of cycle, to correct too much in the other direction, and so on until the system fluctuates =AoscillatesA> out of control. 0his phenomenon is illustrated in Figure ". H@scillation and FeedbackI. If, at 7oint A, the trend belo standard is recognized and ne inputs are added, but not until 7oint *, the system ill overreact and go beyond the allo able limits. Again, if this is recognized at 7oint !, but inputs are not ithdra n until 7oint 5, it ill cause the system to drop belo the lo er limit of allo able variation.&4'

@ne solution to this problem rests in anticipation, hich involves measuring not only the change but also the rate of change. 0he correction is outlined as a factor of the type and rate of the error. 0he difficulty also might be overcome by reducing the time lag bet een the measurement of the output and the ad1ustment to input. If a trend can be indicated, a time lead can be introduced to compensate for the time lag, bringing about consistency bet een the need for correction and the type and magnitude of the indicated action. It is usually more effective for an organization to maintain continuous measurement of its performance and to make small ad1ustments in operations constantly =this assumes a highly sensitive control system>. Information feedback, conse9uently, should be timely and correct to be effective. 0hat is, the information should provide an accurate indication of the status of the system.&4'

Setting standards
,etting the proper standards or control limits is a problem in many systems. 7arents are confronted ith this dilemma in e3pressing hat they e3pect of their children, and business managers face the same issue in establishing standards that ill be acceptable to employees. ,ome theorists have proposed that orkers be allo ed to set their o n standards, on the assumption that hen people establish their o n goals, they are more apt to accept and achieve them. ,tandards should be as precise as possible and communicated to all persons concerned. .oreover, communication alone is not sufficient; understanding is necessary. In human systems, standards tend to be poorly defined and the allo able range of deviation from standard also indefinite. For e3ample, ho many hours each day should a professor be e3pected to be available for student consultationJ @r, hat kind of behavior should be e3pected by students in the classroomJ 5iscretion and personal 1udgment play a large part in such systems, to determine hether corrective action should be taken. 7erhaps the most difficult problem in human systems is the unresponsiveness of individuals to indicated correction. 0his may take the form of opposition and subversion to control, or it may be related to the lack of defined responsibility or authority to take action. )eadership and positive motivation then become vital ingredients in achieving the proper response to input re9uirements. .ost control problems relate to design; thus the solution to these problems must start at that point. Automatic control systems, provided that human intervention is possible to handle e3ceptions, offer the greatest promise. 0here is a danger, ho ever, that e may measure characteristics that do not represent effective performance =as in the case of the speaker ho re9uested that all of the people ho could not hear hat he as saying should raise their hands>, or that improper information may be communicated.&4'