Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
EXHIBIT “1”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-2 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 2 of 7
NOTE: This dossier #6 is posted on six (6) locations of Taitz website. Liberi’s SSN is
located on the last page.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=8;
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?m=20090417;
http://orlytaitzesq.com/dossier-006.htm;
http://orlytaitzesq.com/drorlytaitzesq/documentation/Dossier6new2.doc;
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?cat=29; and
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?cat=3&paged=2
Dossier #6
Dossier #6
www.repubx.com
04.08.09.
Please see in attachment affidavit of licensed private investigator Jorge Baro and forensic
document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines. Both are stating that Certification of Live Birth
posted by Obama on internet cannot be viewed as genuine and original birth certificate from the
vault in Hawaii needs to be produced to verify his place of birth and citizenship.
Further you can see a statement by Suzie Murzinski in regards to fundraising by Obama in
Senegal, using Western Union. Fundraising abroad for the presidential election is illegal and this
statement is consistent with prior reports of Obama illegally getting campaign contributions from
abroad, mostly from Arabic Muslim countries.
Further you can see receipts showing diversion of campaign contributions. I have received e-
mails from donors, stating that they had problems with pay-pal. I described these problems in
dossier #5, specifically that the e-mail address in my blog for pay-pal was changed, which
prevented me from raising funds. My web master Lisa Ostella stated that such a report gives her,
as a web master. bad name and demanded that I take the hacking report back. She stated that she
was convinced that the changing of the e-mail address was done by a volunteer moderator Fran,
she stated that she locked Fran from the blog and that should solve the problem. I felt that the
matter needs to be investigated by the FBI and I felt that they should draw their own conclusions.
Ms. Ostella stated that if I do not take back my complaint to FBI, she will no longer host my
foundation on her server. When I found a new web master to host my foundation, Ms. Ostella
instead of transferring the access codes and the domain, has locked me and another volunteer
moderator out of the blog, posted a bizarre defamatory statement, that I supposedly authorized
hacking into my own account and further defamatory comments about me were placed under
different names and aliases. Moreover, there were comments posted supposedly under my name,
even though I was locked out of the account and couldn’t respond. I got reports that some
defamatory comments were made under alias usually used by Lisa Liberi, assistant for Attorney
Phillip Berg, who filed similar legal actions. I started receiving statements and copies of pay -pal
receipts, showing instead of my e-mail address, an e-mail address of Lisa Ostella. Originally, I
thought that maybe her address showed on the receipt, since she was a web master on the
account, however, when I checked the names and dates on the receipts against the names on the
roster, that I downloaded earlier, I could see that those were not received by the foundation,
those donations were missing.
A couple of weeks ago I have received a phone call, providing information that Lisa Liberi, a
paralegal, assisting Mr. Berg, has an extensive criminal record. I decided to verify that.
According to Mr. Neil Sankey, licensed private investigator with 20 years of experience in
Scotland Yard and over 12 years of experience in US, those statements were correct. Lisa Liberi
aka Lisa Richardson aka Lisa Courville and other aliases had an extensive criminal record going
back to 1990s, that included Grand Theft, forgery, forgery of seals “From 2000 to 2004, Liberi
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-2 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 4 of 7
b. my efforts to conduct investigation of illegal, criminal activity and my efforts to have FBI and
attorney generals of different states involved.
In regards to the Natural Born status, she claimed that she has written pleadings for Phil Berg
and that the citizenship of Obama’s father is of no importance. This was repeated time and again
when she appeared together with Phil Berg at different radio programs. In reality definition of
Natural Born citizen is, that it is one, who is born in the country, with both parents citizens of
the country, one that does not have allegiance to any other sovereignty at birth. It appears that it
was an effort to sway the public and redirect attention from the most obvious, the fact that
Obama’s father was not a citizen of the US and therefore he does not qualify, no matter where he
was born. Did someone help Liberi avoid 8 year jail term here in CA in exchange for her efforts
to cloud the issue?
Second issue dealt with criminal activities surrounding Obama and his supporters. I have been
the only one investigating those issues. Why?
Another interesting fact. Plains radio had a legal action against a blog radio talk show host
Evelyn Adams aka momma E. Momma E is represented in this action by attorney Philip Berg.
When Lisa Ostella locked me out of my own foundation, due to the fact that she has registered
the domain before I had an opportunity to do so; she created several diversionary blogs and
posted links to Momma E and a few other parties that are rumored to be plants, meaning false
leaders of the movement.
I am not a historian and not a theologist, however this whole situation reminds me of a story of
Shabtai Zvi. A few centuries ago there was a false leader in Europe, his name was Shabtai Zvi.
He claimed to be a Masaya and thousands followed him until he was summoned by a sultan, who
has given Zvi two choices:
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-2 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 5 of 7
First- if you are really a Masaya, you will be executed, but you will be resurrected as a Masaya.
Second - if you are not a Masaya and want to live, you have to convert to Islam.
Within about five minutes Shabtai Zvi put on a Muslim garb and converted and that was the end
of the false Masaya, false leader and false movement.
Similarly here, a leader is judged by his willingness to go all the way, regardless of hardships
and risks or financial problems. You can’t talk only about the birth certificate and not see an
elephant in the room, which is Obama’d British citizenship at birth, based on his father’s
citizenship. You can’t talk about his birth certificate only and not demand immediate
investigation of his numerous reported social security numbers, reported forgery of the Selective
Service Certificate, perjury on the Illinois Bar application, all the evidence of campaign
contributions fraud, charitable foundations fraud, tax fraud and numerous reports of his
supporters being engaged in cyber crimes, intimidation, harassment, identity theft and all the
other related crimes
Due to the above I renew my demand upon all the law enforcement agencies listed in this dossier
to conduct immediate criminal investigator, I demand on behalf of my clients Quo Warranto
proceedings to resolve those issues once and for all.
Sincerely,
> Lisa Liberi, aka Lisa Richardson, 42, New Mexico, was sentenced in
> connection with felony charges involving identity theft and forged
> documents. Liberi appeared in San Bernardino County, Rancho Cucamonga,
> Superior Court, on March 21, 2008. She was sentenced to a state prison term
> of 8 years, imposed but stayed, and placed on supervised probation for 3
> years as part of a plea agreement. Liberi was sentenced on ten felony
> counts ranging from Grand Theft, Forgery, and Filing False Documents.
>
> From 2000 to 2004, Liberi engaged in a complex fraud involving falsification
> of police reports, manipulation of credit bureau reports, loan fraud, and
> counterfeiting of court documents resulting in hundreds of thousands of
> dollars in losses to banks and credit unions.
>
> In 2002, San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department personnel arrested
> Liberi on theft by false pretense charges. In July 2004, Investigators from
> the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Real Estate Fraud Unit
> arrested Liberi at the Ontario International Airport for additional felony
> charges while she was out on bail.
>
> She has an extensive criminal record going back to the 90’s.
Here is the Liberi stuff you requested. This is also what I sent to Bob Unruh
Bob here are some bare facts about Berg’s assistant. See below and attachments
I don’t know how much of the story you have already, but is essentially about WHO she really is
and the questions that unfortunately brings up about Berg.
Neil Sankey
Investigator & Consultant.
(Addendum)
According to the Police she was born COURVILLE and married a Richardson (Possible Alan
Douglas Richardson, currently residing in Las Vegas .) IF it was the other way around, then the
Courville is Bill Marshall Courville 11/10/61 of Houston , Tx. 457-71-x I have several SS#’s for
her and a LOT of AKA’s. Her real SS# is probably 462-45-xxxx. Most prominent otherwise are
563-60-xxxx, 572-17-x, 622-19-x She went BK in 2002 Her brother is probably Lawrence E
Morris of Fontana and Rancho Cuc , CA . He was born 1/16/64 Her Husband, Brent J, a Parolee,
I have not researched that. Is probably Brent J McCormack 563-77, also uses 331-02-x
There is also a Jerry HELLER and Douglas Cramer look interesting, but where do you stop?.
It comes as no surprise to learn that the link to a Visa donation to Berg, (as opposed to Paypal)
has been removed
Neil
EXHIBIT “3”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-4 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 2 of 10
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=36
« KY secretary of state
Million Patriots march »
In regards to Lisa Liberi, assistant to Phil Berg. As I stated, she has an extensive criminal record
of forgery, forgery of seal, grand theft and so on. Lisa Liberi was stating that it is not her, that it
is another Lisa Liber, and that she lives in PA and not NM, however this is not true. She lives in
NM, her home phone number and address is in NM and this can be verified with the probation
officer Joanne Martinez fax 505-476-2368, phone 505-827-8627.
I corresponded with John Hemenway ESQ, who filed Hollister v Soetoro case in DC for Phil
Berg and he stated that Lisa Liberi, who works for Berg lives in NM. When his son was buying a
truck in NM, she told him, that she lives there and can assist.
One of former volunteers for Phil Berg has written a statement and went with me to FBI in San
Antonio and reported that Lisa Liberi, who works for Berg lives in Santa Fe, NM and she sent
Christmas presents to Lisa to NM. Today many employees and volunteers work from home and
correspond via e-mails and phone calls. This volunteer stated that Lisa Liberi corresponds via e-
mails and phone. A person will not make a report with FBI and risk going to jail unless
she provides a truthful statement. She also recorded this statement on video.
I had three confirmations from 3 independent sources of the findings of licensed investigator Mr.
Sankey Before I posted dossier #6. After all the revelations the name of Lisa Liberi in Mr. Berg’s
site was changed to Agent88.
I believe, that when non-profit organizations are involved and donations are collected, one
should not employ people that are questionable and particularly people that have a lengthy
criminal record that includes forgery, forgery of seals and grand theft.
I have closed the pay pal account, when I saw that Lisa Ostella has redirected the the Defend
Our Freedoms blog and redirected the pay pal. Now there is no pay-pal for this foundation and
there will not be any more questions. I will be setting a direct visa/credit card donation button ,
where donations will go directly to the foundation, so there will not be a problem of someone
redirecting donations by changing the e-mail address on the pay pal button.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-4 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 3 of 10
Yet another important matter. So far none of Obama eligibility matters have gone to trial and we
all are working hard to change it. But let’s say one such case goes to trial. We don’t want to be
impeached by Obama’s attorneys saying that we knowingly employed shady characters,
who might’ve supplied us with incorrect information. Just like the country needs to be purged of
Obama and his clique, that are in power by virtue of forgery, fraud and consealment of vital
records, the patriots of this country need to purge their ranks.
This entry was posted on Saturday, April 18th, 2009 at 2:29 pm and is filed under Other Criminal or Suspicious
Activities. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are
currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-4 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 4 of 10
EXHIBIT “4”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-4 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 5 of 10
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=119
Hi Dr. Taitz,
Just to let you know that I donated to your cause on 1/19/09 thru PAYPAL. I copied the transaction that
was provided to me by PAYPAL, please see the following:
This email confirms that you have donated $25.00 USD to Defend Our Freedoms
(lisaostella@hotmail.com) using PayPal.
Donation Details
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-4 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 6 of 10
Recipient information
This entry was posted on Sunday, April 19th, 2009 at 8:32 am and is filed under Other Criminal or Suspicious
Activities. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are
currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-4 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 7 of 10
EXHIBIT “5”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-4 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 8 of 10
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=195
I have been following your activities to force Barack Obama to comply with the
requirements of our Constitution, but was floored this morning when I read what
the Webmaster Ms. Ostella had done to you.
This is so obviously a crime. You should ask law enforcement to bring criminal
charges for stealing you good name and donations intended exclusively for you.
You in turn should file a civil suit suing her for theft and ask for large punitive
damages. You certainly have proof of damages if what you wrote is true and it
sounds plausible. Please keep up your work. God bless America!
Good luck,
Al Barrs
albarrs@wfeca.net
Greenwood, FL
Dear Mr. Barrs,
I have reported the matter to the Sheriff’s department and FBI . See below the
receipt for the police report with the name and phone number of the detective.
The name of the FBI agent is John Haas- supervisor of the cyber crimes unit 714-
542-8825. Please spread the word and give everybody the new web address for
the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, which is http://www.OrlyTaitzEsq.com
Please post this web address in as many blogs and sites as you can, so it will be
picked up quickly by different search engines and can be seen by all my readers. I
have closed my pay pal account and did not receive any pay pal or visa donation
since 04.11.09. If you or anybody else has given any donations after this
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-4 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 9 of 10
date, using pay-pal, visa, MasterCard, American Express and so on, believing
that these donations were received by the Defend Our Freedoms foundation,
please demand a refund and report it to the Sheriffs department, FBI and IRS as
funds stolen from the non profit organization. I have sent a Cease and Desist
letter to Ms. Lisa Ostella, demanding that she forward to me the access codes for
the domains and the e-mail address list of the readers and stop fraudulently
operating under the name DefendOurFreedoms and stop drawing financial profit
from the Defend Our Freedoms name. I have also sent a Cease and Desist letter
to Evelyn Adams aka Momma E, talk show host David Levin and other parties
who are fraudulently advertising on the foundation website and drawing profit
from it or from reader lists given or sold to them by Ms. Ostella. Ironically Ms.
Ostella has accused me of collecting information on the readers. In reality I did
not have any such information and could not reach most of the readers, aside
from ones whose names were in my dr_taitz@yahoo.com e-mail account. Ms.
Lisa Ostella is the one, who collected names and e-mail addresses and she is
currently fraudulently sending e-mails to these readers using
DefendOurFreedoms name. If you get such e-mail, please demand that she
immediately stop this practice and forward the list to me, as the president of the
foundation.
My primary goal is to expose all the fraud committed by Obama and removing
him out of office as an usurper, litigation against Ms. Ostella is secondary. I also
need to get full information in regards to full damage to the foundation and me,
stemming from actions of Ms. Ostella and parties that patronage her site and
are aiding and abetting her.
I, also, sent an e-mail with dossier #6 to Mr. Phil Berg, advising him of lengthy
criminal record of grand theft, forgery, forgery of seal and other related crimes,
committed by Ms. Lisa Liberi, his paralegal and assistant, who reportedly was
managing his fund raising efforts. I believe Mr. Berg should not be using a
person with such past in his fund raising efforts and legal practice and should
issue a statement advising the donors and supporters, that Ms. Lisa Liberi is no
longer employed by him or his foundation and that he is reviewing all donations
and all legal records handled by Ms. Lisa Liberi. I believe the donors to Mr.
Berg foundation should get assurances that their donations were used for
litigation and the cause and not to reimburse victims of Ms. Liberi’s prior
schemes, reported to add to $21,000 per month.
Sincerely,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
04.21.09.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-4 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 10 of 10
Tags: Add new tag, Berg litigation, birth certificate, crimes Lisa Ostella, Lisa Liberi, obama
This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 21st, 2009 at 8:29 am and is filed under HOT ITEMS!, LINKS, Legal
Actions, Letters from Readers and Patriots, Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities, Supporting Documentation.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 1 of 94
EXHIBIT “6”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 2 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=513
1. any and all newspaper articles about Baxter pharmaceuticals flu vaccines, infected with live
strain
3. how did Baxter become the company associated to WHO, responsible for coming up with
swine flu vaccine?
5 which companies manufacture Tamiflu and similar medications, their contributions to Obama,
their shareholders?
6. who is responsible for entering data at Intelius Jobs.com and removing such data, how is it
done?
7. what investigation was done at 29th palms marine base re the swine flu?
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 3 of 94
8. were there any other recent suspicious flu outbreaks at military bases?
This entry was posted on Friday, May 1st, 2009 at 10:11 am and is filed under Health & Safety, Help Needed. You
can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 4 of 94
EXHIBIT “7”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 5 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=759
As you can see in dossier #6 on this blog, I have received verified information from a licenced
CA Private Investigator Mr. Neil Sankey (license 10905) , that Lisa Liberi, working as a
paralegal for Phil Berg has a lengthy criminal record of grand theft and forgery (see dossier #6).
I have sent Mr. Berg this information, he never responded and never denied it. Due to the fact
that Ms. Liberi has access to numerous documents and donations, I was obligated to provide this
information to the public. Information that was provided, is public record and I urge everybody
to call San Bernardino, CA criminal court system as well as NM probation officer (number in
dossier) and verify that all the information is correct. I have urged Mr. Berg to disassociated
himself and his practice and donation efforts from this person and hire a forensic accountant and
forensic document examiner to review all documents and forensic records handled by her. Mr.
Berg did not do so. From what I understand their website was under lockdown and Ms. Liberi
went by name Agent88.
Paperwork filed yesterday was nothing but slander against me, a lot of sand in the eyes, but if
you read carefully, the only thing they are trying to do, is further hide Liberi’s identity, saying
that there is an undisclosed address and asking for a new social security number. They do not and
cannot deny following important points:
1. Lisa Liberi, working for Philip Berg, resides in New Mexico, previously resided in CA and
has a lengthy record of grand theft and forgery of documents.
2. Phil Berg was warned by me and a volunteer, that her continuing association with the Obama
litigation undermines everybody’s work and everybody’s effords, as it puts into question
integrity of fundraising of donations and veracity of any and all documents handled by her.
3. Regardless of what might be financial and other arrangements of Mr. Berg with Ms. Liberi, as
an officer of the court, he had a duty to disassociate his fundraising efforts and legal research
from her. I believe he owes this to all the patriots involved in this effort, particularly people like
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 6 of 94
me working 24/7. He has an obligation to hire a forensic accountant and forensic document
examiner and check all the records. Imagine, if any of Obama eligibility cases go to trial, Berg
and any and all attorneys will be impeached and reasonable doubt will be in the minds of the
jurors, if they know that the documents presented, were gathered by a person with the record of
forged documents, that the supervising attorney knew about it and made no effort to disasiociate
himself and verify the records by the licensed professional. Rest assured, that if I could obtain
this information about Ms. Liberi, so could Obama’s attorneys, with millions of dollars available
to them. I am wondering if Ms. Liberi’s association with Mr. Berg was mastermind by
somebody, as she had a conviction in March of last year, was supposed to serve 8 years in San
Bernardino CA, but the sentence was reduced to probation and restitution to victims.
4. On the contrary, as the first donors reported to me problems with pay-pal, I have reported this
to the police and FBI immediately. The reports were posted on the blog. When web master Lisa
Ostella has stated that she wants me to take back my complaint, I switched to a different web
master and made sure that with the current web master my e-mail address is listed on the
registration of the domain, in order not to have the same problem. Ms. Ostella’s actions as a web
master in locking me out of my web site, allowing several days of defamatory statements and
later defrauding the donors and my foundation, by sending e-mails and claiming to represent
foundation and soliciting donations for the foundation are inexcusable and will have to be
prosecuted in due time.
5. I did not intent to prosecute this matter at this time, as I felt that Obama eligibility prosecution
and research is more important for the country at large, however I will respond as required to the
filing by Mr. Berg.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 5th, 2009 at 7:57 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any
responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 7 of 94
EXHIBIT “8”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 8 of 94
http://216.221.102.26/blogger/post/Follow-up-on-the-FBI.aspx
I just got of the phone with Mike Haas- supervisor of the Cyber Crimes unit with the Orange
County, CA FBI. He is my point of contact, phone 714-542-8825. He will give the case to the
supervisor of the forgery unit and will get back with me later on today or on Monday.
I need everybody who donated to my foundation and have seen change of the e-mail address,
where instead of my e-mail (orly.taitz@gmail.com or dr_taitz@yahoo.com) to contact the
superviser of the cyber crimes unit 714-542-8825 and report this.
I got an e-mail a while ago, that a gentleman was selling a motorcycle and stated that he would
donate the proceeds to my foundation. I was told that there was bidding as high as 7,500, but I
never got that donation. If you are a person that was selling that bike or you are a person that
bought that bike, please contact me 949-683 -5411.
I received information that Lisa Liberi and her husband had an access to the credit card donations
for Phil Berg. If you have any info on this, please contact me.
If you know of any defamatory or fraudulent statements, any evidence of cyber crimes, fraud,
identity theft made after Lisa Ostella has hijacked my foundation blog, please forward this to the
above number. If you have evidence of any other federal crimes committed in relation to my
case and Obama eligibility case, that I am investigating, please forward it to the same point of
contact, same number.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 9 of 94
EXHIBIT “9”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 10 of 94
http://216.221.102.26/blogger/post/More-on-Lisa-Liberi-contact-her-probation-officer-in-Santa-
Fe-New-Mexico-505-827-8627-She-is-not-allowed-to-be-anywhere-near-other-peoples-credit-
cards.aspx
EXHIBIT “10”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 12 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=807
« Update in re to SCOTUS
from reader Penni Basse »
Well, in the pleadings prepared by her and Berg and in their joint radio appearance on the redio
of Momma E aka Evelyn Adams, they admitted that I provided correct and truthful information,
as Liberi stated that after I provided her address, she became fearful of her ex-husband and now
she needs to go into hiding and change her social security number. The only information I
provided, is one of Lisa Liberi, residing in NM. If she would’ve been this woman residing in
PA, she would’ve had no reason to be concerned about me providing an address in NM.
She does reside in NM, she corresponds with Berg via e-mails and phone and Berg needs to
explain to the public and donors, what is his justification for continuing employment of one with
such a serious criminal record of forgery and grand theft.
Initial evidence in Obama eligibility case became a public record in August of 2008. I am not
using a record of affidavits, that they presented, but I would like to confirm this school
registration, that originally was published in a newspaper in Indonesia. Can someone find it?
I am, also, looking for the newspaper article, that has a full press conference with Janet Okubo,
spokesperson for the Director of Health of HI Dr. Chiyome Fukino. Can anyone find this full
press conference?
This entry was posted on Friday, May 8th, 2009 at 12:28 pm and is filed under Dossiers. You can follow any
responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 13 of 94
EXHIBIT “11”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 14 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=834
THE LATEST
01/02/2009: PRESS RELEASE - Philip J. Berg, Esquire Obtained the Obama 1964
Divorce File
01/02/09: The latest in the Berg vs. Obama Case No. 08 - 570 is that there are two
conferences scheduled; one for January 9, 2009 to hear the Petition for Writ of Certiorari
and the other for January 16, 2009 to hear the Petition for Injunction.
I got this information. Beginning of January was the last time there was any info posted on
Berg’s site.
By the way, Berg and Lisa Liberi got Dunham-Soetoro divorce papers from me and they got
Dunham-Obama divorce papers from Ed Hale.
Prior to the electoral vote I tried to file a legal action on behalf of the electors, to get verification
of Obama’s eligibility. I got in touch with some attorneys in Conservative red states and asked
them to file with me and sign Pro Hac Vice- it is a form that allows an out of state attorney to
work together with the in state attorney. I Worked with an attorney in AL, Keith Cornett and
later Ben Dupre, associate of Moral law center, that is ran by former Chief Justice of Al Supreme
Court Rory Moore. I studied all of Al elections statutes and Keith Cornett filed a request in HI to
get Dunham divorce papers. When he couldn’t get them, I got in touch with attorney Jim
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 15 of 94
Hochberg in HI and he personally went to the court house and got the Dunham -Soetoro papers. I
e-mailed Berg and stated that I got these divorce papers and would like to know if they want
them, since it can help both cases. Berg asked me to e-mail them and later Lisa Liberi called and
asked to mail a hard copy.
Dunham-Obama divorce papers were obtained by Ed Hale, who paid a private investigator to go
to HI and obtain the copy.
I never asked for any credit. Many of you read my blog and you could see that I didn’t even
mention hundreds and hundreds of hours I’ve spent trying to bring an action on behalf of
electors, who would have a better standing. At the end we could not file such action in AL, since
the statutes were amorphous, it wasn’t a strong hook, however Mr. Robert Cusanelli, an elector
from AL, who actually voted in the 2008 electoral college, became one of my plaintiffs. Now
you know how much work was done in conjunction with this one plaintiff, one out of over a
100.
Considering all the work that I have done, the allegations coming from Berg, are just outrageous
and hurtful. I believe a lot of what Berg is doing now is related to some criminal issues involving
Lisa Liberi. I got information from one of the people that worked with Berg and Lisa Liberi,
whereby Lisa Liberi stated that she gets disability payments from social security and those
payments were paid by Berg to her husband, so that she can continue receiving disability
payments. I decided to check this matter and called James Secord-District Attorney of San
Bernardino county in CA, who prosecuted Lisa Liberi, when she got 8 years in jail for grand
theft and forgery and this jail term was stayed and reduced to probation and restitution,
supposedly because of her medical disability. Mr. Secord has confirmed all of the information
in regards to her conviction and stated that she is indeed getting disability payments from the
government. If Berg is paying her for her services and it is done in any form: check or cash or
indirectly through her husband, it is a very serious offense for both of them. I would like to find
as much information, as I possibly can in regards to this matter. If you have donated to Berg,
where did the donation go? I believe, Berg filed this frivolous action to keep everybody quiet
about Lisa Liberi’s past and her current actions. Another matter, that I am trying to ascertain,
where does she get the restitution that she owes to the victims of her felonious activities in CA. If
you read dossier #6, you can see that the total restitution is $21,000 per month. Possibly it was
reduced to 12,000 per month. Where is this money coming from? If she is on disability and her
husband is working at a factory, where do they get this kind of money? This is a catch 22. If she
is not paying restitution, she is supposed to go back to jail and serve her 8 year term. If she is
paying this restitution and she is paid by Berg, then there are two very serious problems:
a. she is working with donations and other people’s credit cards, which means she is violating
her probation and supposed to go back to jail. Berg should not be allowing her to be anywhere
near the donations
b. If she is getting any payments from Berg, while getting disability, that is fraud and she is
supposed to go back to jail and is supposed to be prosecuted on these additional charges.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 16 of 94
Her probation officer is Dawn Hellwig. Another officer in the department, who is familiar with
the case is Johanne Martinez. If you have given any donations to the offices of Phil Berg, you
need to contact Dawn Hellwig and demand an answer. I need to know if there are any
volunteers, who live in Santa Fe.
There is another issue. Did somebody arrange for her to be associated with Berg, to get him into
serious legal trouble. Was this arranged to begin with? I discovered an interesting detail and
need your help in getting to the bottom of this.
Liberi was first arrested in Rancho Cucomanga Ca, being involved in financial fraud schemes
going back to 2001-20o2. When I looked at the name of the town, I remembered, that among
130 jobs for Barack Obama and Michelle Obama, there was one notation: Michelle Obama
working for “Muslim World Today” in Rancho Cucomanga, CA. (dossier #1)
I remember being surprised,since Obamas claim to be Christian. As I’ve written in dossier #7,
this current position was recently erased with 110 other positions and I demanded investigation
in this destruction of evidence affair. Of Course Holder did nothing so far.
Another parallel. According to District attorney Secord, Liberi has changed her social security
number several times and now she applied for yet another SS number.
If you recall in dossier #1, I provided 100 addresses around the country for Obama that are
connected to 25 different social security numbers.
Liberi has changed her last name. Her name was Corvelle and Richardson. For some reason she
and her husband suddenly took the name Liberi. According to the private investigator, the
husband’s last name was Brent McCormick.
By the way, her social security number is a public knowledge, not only because of her conviction
for grand theft and forgery, but also because of her bankruptcies. According to the private
investigator, Mr. Sankey, there are 4 bankruptcy filings done by her: one -under Richardson, one
under Corvelle and two under Liberi. This information is readily available to 5 billion people on
the planet, who have access to Internet, which makes Berg’s case for injunction totally frivolous.
I need all the information, that can be found in regards to criminal convictions for her and her
husband. I need to know all of their associations, particularly in Rancho Cucomanga CA.
There are Internet services, that can give you a printout of web sites, as they were a month ago
or a year ago. These are crawlers, that scan the Internet. One of them is “Internet Access
Wayback Machine”. There are other similar services. I need your help in getting info in both
directions:
a. all of the names, addresses, social, associates, convictions, incarcerations for Liberi. Any and
all info on her husband. You can see past recordings on the Wayback machine.
b. any and all info on those 100 addresses and 25 social security numbers for Obama and 130 job
positions for Obamas . When did those appear in databases and when were those erased? Those
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 17 of 94
addresses and ss numbers and job positions came from Lexis-Nexis, Choice Point, Jobs.com
Intellius.
I was asked, How do they get those addresses? It is all coming from public records: non-profit
organizations, their donations records, county recordings, real estate recordings, probate records
of the deceased (do you remember that Madeline Dunham, Obama’s grandmother was a
volunteer for the probate department of Oahu circuit court), disclosed salaries (if you recall,
recently Washington DC FBI has raided offices of Vivek Kundra, Obama’s chief of computer
security and arrested his assistant amidst allegations of creating bogus job positions and splitting
salaries). We need to find the connections: who and when created those fraudulent units and who
and when erased them.
I need help from patriots, who are in law inforcement, such as Police, Sheriff, FBI, Marshall, DA
, Border Patrol, military police. Most importantly in CA, NM, PA, Il and DC.
Tags: Berg litigation, birth certificate, eligibility, natural born citizen, obama, orly, taitz
This entry was posted on Saturday, May 9th, 2009 at 9:22 am and is filed under Dossiers, HOT ITEMS!, Latest
News, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and
pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 18 of 94
EXHIBIT “12”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 19 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=945
« Obama is running a horrific 1.8 trillion dollar deficit this year, leading this country straight into
bankruptcy
Follow up on Muslim World Today »
New Window
Defendant 1 of 1
Arrest Charges
Violation
Count Charge Severity Description Plea Status
Date
Violation
Count Charge Severity Description Plea Status
Date
Home
LIBERI-V-J RIVAS ET
LIBERI, LISA PLAINTIFF Quiet Title SCVSS107057 08/25/2003
AL
REDLANDS
Other Civil
LIBERI, LISA DEFENDANT CENTENNIAL BANK SCISS78115 06/05/2001
Contracts
VS. LISA LIBERI
In regards to Obamas, if you recall, they had some 100 addresses in National databases, he had
25 Social security numbers and they both had 130 job positions. Recently most of this info was
erased from National databases, but we have a hard copy in Dossier#1.
One of the job descriptions was for Michelle Obama- with a newspaper “Muslim World Today”
in Rancho Cucomanga, CA. I called the directory, there is no listing for this News Paper. They
do have a large Muslim Community and a Muslim American Society. I tried to call them and
inquire about the News Paper. The Phone number 909-945-5078 is currently disconnected. Do
we have volunteers in that area?
In regards to Liberi she also has several social security numbers and several names. From around
2000 she lived in this small community of Rancho Cucomanga and it looks like she changed her
name around that time. Aside from 8 year prison term, that she got last year, that was reduced to
probation(how and why?) she has another active case, see above, where the charges include
forgery and forgery of seal. She might be looking at additional prison term on those charges, if
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 21 of 94
convicted at trial. Talking to the arresting officer and DA, I found out, that this woman sues
everybody around her. She makes up charges and slanders people, hoping to intimidate and
harass them and reduce her prison term. You can see among the charges one, where she filed
against the county. I can understand, why she is coming up with all those slanderous charges
against me and everybody around, she wants people quiet, but it is sad that Berg, an attorney, fell
into a trap of a common criminal. I don’t get harassed, I don’t get intimidated, she cannot pull
this garbage with me and I will get to the bottom of it. It seems to me that this woman was
somehow planted to discredit Berg and the whole Obama’s illegibility for presidency litigation.
We don’t need tainted evidence coming from her, we will win without any evidence prepared by
her. There is sufficient evidence against Obama without her. I believe she is a diversion and was
put in place to discredit the effort. I believe Phil Berg needs to distance himself from her, and
cooperate in getting to the bottom of this matter before this issue becomes irreversible for him.
This entry was posted on Monday, May 11th, 2009 at 2:59 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any
responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 22 of 94
EXHIBIT “13”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 23 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=978
**Note: Scroll past the Name list and you will see Taitz writings about Liberi.
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security - 535-40-xxxx
Age - 52
Date of Birth - Nov 29, 1942
Deceased - Yes
Date Record Verified - Oct 94 - Jan 95
******************************************************************************
***************************
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security - 535-40-xxxx
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased - No
Date Record Verified - Dec 92
******************************************************************************
***************************
As you can see somebody used this record of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, in
different fashion. There were records created for her as a female and as a male. Noteworthy is a
fact, that in 1987 she is marked as deceased, and in 1990, three years later, she is alive again.
Now look at this record with the social security number belonging to Stanley Ann Dunham and a
name of Phyliss Albriktsen. Who created this record and why? It has to be somebody, who knew
Dunham’s social and the name of her classmate from WA, Phyliss Albriktsen, who was only a
couple of months older then Dunham. I don’t think Phyliss created this record. Typically people
don’t know the social security numbers of their friends. Could it be Dunham herself? Could it be
“somebody” who was close to Dunham, knew her ss number and probably has seen Phyliss
Albriktsen’s name somewhere in an old year book?
Now look at Obama- see in Dossier #1- 100 addresses with 25 different ss numbers.
Now look at this Lisa Liberi, who prepared the records and the case for Phil Berg. I believe some
of those records were leading into a dead alley and association with her would ‘ve compromised
the case to the point of no return, specifically because of her history of forgery. Was she used to
compromise the whole effort? What is her history? Numerous convictions of grand theft
and forgery. Just like with Obama , her records show numerous social security numbers. I am
trying to ascertain where did she live before CA- all the states, addresses and ss numbers. When
exactly did she change her name to Liberi from Courville or Richardson? When did her husband
or ex-husband Brent change his name to Liberi? She claims to live in PA, but says that I invaded
her privacy by providing her address. The only address I provided was one in NM. How would it
harm a person in PA if an address of somebody in NM was disclosed? What is her real social
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 28 of 94
security number? Why did she apply for a new ss number in CA in 2000? Did she try to cover up
a prior criminal record? Just a year after she got this ss number in CA (not in PA) she was
arrested on economic crimes in Rancho Cucomanga, CA. For some of these crimes she got 8
year prison term in CA, that was reduced to probation, some are still pending trial. When did Phil
Berg find out about this record? Why did he continue employing her? Why does he still employ
her? Is he being threatened by her or somebody else? Is this a threat of disclosure of facts? What
facts? From what I understand, Momma E aka Evelyn Adams and her husband JD Adams lived
in CA too. Was there any connection between them and Liberi? Did they reside in PA or NJ? Do
they have any record? We really need to get to the bottom of all of this. We don’t want any
surprises in court. We need to know it all before it goes to trial.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 13th, 2009 at 7:41 am and is filed under HOT ITEMS!, Help Needed.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 29 of 94
EXHIBIT “14”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 30 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=1055
« Previous Post
Political Question Doctrine »
On the news last night a man received a stimulus check for his mother, he told the reporter
that she died in 1967.
The Social Security Administration doesn’t seem to be very worried about it.
I haven’t worked in several years but I don’t qualify for a stimulus check because I didn’t
have income of at least $3,000. last year or the year before.
Please write to the Social Securtiy Administration. This is a real scheme. They need to clean the
records of the social security numbers of the deceased or people having numerous numbers. We
have seen Obama with numerous SS numbers, we have seen Lisa Liberi with numerous ss
numbers. These schemes brake the back of our economy. Demand from your state and US
representatives and senators to clean up SSA schemes, immediate audit of ss rolls, purging of all
ss numbers of the deceased or multiple numbers and vigorous prosecution for the ss fraud and
identity theft. Keep in mind that even theft of the ss number of the deceased is an identity theft
This entry was posted on Saturday, May 16th, 2009 at 5:47 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow
any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 31 of 94
EXHIBIT “15”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 32 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=1249
« Who owns the land allocated for the North American Union Superhighway?
From reader Ted on disaster economy »
Voter verification
this is important. look at the link. It shows the states that require paper trail of the electronic
voting.
We need to do a couple of things.
1. Lets check those 100 addresses with 25 social security numbers for Obama, how did they
vote? What I mean: Did they vote? What residences on file?
2. We need to start checking from OH- swing state and SOS Jennifer Brunner was completely
out of control, she was allowing people to vote with the address of park in the bench. Buss loads
of people were coming from out of state, how many of them were bench in the park inhabitants?
3. I was curious about those several ss numbers of Lisa Liberi, any voting? In any states?
Flag this message
Voting issues
Wednesday, May 20, 2009 2:12 AM
From:
“Magnus Johansson”
To:
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Orly!
Regards,
Magnus
This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 20th, 2009 at 6:37 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow
any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 33 of 94
EXHIBIT “16”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 34 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=1346
Overview
Follow up on disappearing information and planted information.
I just got an e-mail from a woman by name Sue, I believe she is a lawyer. She is saying
that when she entered my name in the ABA registry, it was not there. Did somebody erase my
name from their on line registry to make me look not credible? Who did it?
1 Disinformation was planted one day before the election about a VA judge supposedly checking
Obama’s birth certificate and finding it to be valid and all challenges frivolous. No such case
ever existed, it was a planted fraud to create an illusion of Obama’s legitimacy and discourage
McCain voters one day before the election
2. one day after the election my case Lightfoot v Bowen was erased from the docket of the
Supreme Court. On march 13th I provided this info to chief Justice Roberts and nothing was
done.
4. next blog defendourfreedoms.is went down several times- nobody knows why
7. I discover 100 addresses for Obama, linked to 25 different ss numbers, report it to Holder,
Mueller, Sullivan, Roberts- no response
8. I discover 130 current job positions for Obama, report it - no response (dossier 1)
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 35 of 94
9. I confront William Chatfield- director of selective service with numerous evidence of forgery
in Obama’s selective service certificate- no response (Dossier4)
10. Forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines provides information and affidavit that
Obama’sCertificate of Live Birth cannot be relied upon as genuine, I report it- no response
(dossier 1 and 6)
10. Somebody erases from the National databases 110 addresses and job positions for Obama
and Michelle Obama, after those were already reported by me (Dossier 7)
11. somebody creates a a Scott Easterling blog and e-mail to assassinate the character of my
plaintiff active duty officer Scott Easterling and defame me and other plaintiffs- it is reported, no
response (dossier 1)
12. I uncover that Lisa Liberi, assistant for Philip Berg has an extensive criminal record in the
state of CA, including forgery of documents and grand theft. It was reported that Liberi was born
in the state of WA (I am verifying). Liberi has numerous social security numbers. Was she
planted to discredit the whole effort? I report it to Berg and recommend to go together to FBI and
demand investigation and to hire a forensic document examiner to check all the docs handled by
her. Instead Berg is filing a frivolous malicious law suit against me and everybody around, trying
to intimidate me and trying to keep me quite.
13. Berg is trying to obfuscate the truth by posting his office address in the pleadings as hers
even though she lives in Santa Fe NM and corresponds with Berg by e-mails and phone
while she is being supervised by the Santa Fe probation officers.
14. My husband just told me, that somebody posted on the Internet information from our
children’s birth certificates. How could that happen? Here I am working 24/7, trying to unseal
Obama’s BC with a compelling and a legitimate reason and nobody in our corrupt establishment
does a thing, and on the other hand somebody can unseal my children’s BC’s with no legitimate
reason. Why? To intimidate me some more? To threaten my kids? To show me that somebody
can do what ever he …likes and I cannot do a … about it?
15. Last year tampering into passport records of presidential candidates was announced. 3
employees were fired. I talked to one of them, he said nothing wrong was done, he sounded
pretty scared. One of the people involved Lt. Harris was found dead, shot in the head.
Will there be an end to this. I refuse to believe that we don’t have any decent people in our law
enforcement- there has to be somebody in FBI, CiA, police, sheriffs, judges, US attorneys, Atty
generals, DAs, state and US representatives, senators, SOS, governors. We need one person to
sign the …subpoenas.It has to be done Now!!!
In re to FBI, I called recently the cyber crimes detective Nathan Le, who was assigned to my
case, where this banner in Arabic, showing hanging of Saddam Hussein appeared on the site of a
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 36 of 94
man, who initiated erasing of an article about me from the Wikipedia. Detective Le told me, that
he needs to talk to his supervisor John Haas 714-542-8825. All the info was given to him, but I
believe this man is simply lazy and incompetent. When I talked to him last month, I told him to
look up something on his computer, he said that he is rather new, he has been at this department
only three months and the Internet is not hooked up to his computer yet. when I started laughing,
he didn’t even get the irony, in the fact that the supervisor of the cyber crimes unit is on the job
for three moths and doesn’t have the Internet hooked up yet?!? Guys, we are really in good
hands!
I called the police, Teresa Standiford is assigned to my case. She told me to file a new report
about the threats. The rest should be in Santa Fe as Liberi resides there.
North Brunswick police needs somebody to actually come to the station and file a report there.
Does anybody live close and can go to the station and file?
This nightmare has to end soon. Look the way our economy is being destroyed and our National
Security is being destroyed. We have to find somebody, who would do the right thing. I see that
Cheney started speaking up. He still has a lot of connections. Biden blubbered that Cheney
left Obama’s BC in the desk. Well, Mr. Cheney, it’s time.
This entry was posted on Friday, May 22nd, 2009 at 12:55 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any
responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 37 of 94
EXHIBIT “17”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 38 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=1648
Berg
LISA LIBERI §
And §
PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE § CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1898
And §
THE LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG §
And §
EVELYN ADAMS a/k/a MOMMA E §
and §
LISA M. OSTELLA §
And § Assigned to Honorable Eduardo C.
GO EXCEL GLOBAL, § Robreno
§
Plaintiffs §
§
§
Vs. §
§
§
ORLY TAITZ, a/k/a DR. ORLY TAITZ, §
a/k/a LAW OFFICES OF ORLY TAITZ, §
a/k/a WWW.ORLY TAITZESQ.COM a/k/a §
WWW.REPUBX.COM a/k/a ORLY TAITZ §
And §
LINDA SUE BELCHER a/k/a LINDA S. §
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 39 of 94
____________________
I, Orly Taitz, certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed to Philip Berg on
this 22 day of May, 2009 via Overnight Federal Express and via ForSure Legal Services Service
of Process, 250 Woodlake Dr. Holland PA 18966
_____________________
Orly Taitz
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 40 of 94
LISA LIBERI §
And §
PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE § CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1898
And §
THE LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG §
And §
EVELYN ADAMS a/k/a MOMMA E §
and §
LISA M. OSTELLA §
And § Assigned to Honorable Eduardo C.
GO EXCEL GLOBAL, § Robreno
§
Plaintiffs§
§
§
Vs. §
§
§
ORLY TAITZ, a/k/a DR. ORLY TAITZ, §
a/k/a LAW OFFICES OF ORLY TAITZ, §
a/k/a WWW.ORLY TAITZESQ.COM a/k/a §
WWW.REPUBX.COM a/k/a ORLY TAITZ §
And §
LINDA SUE BELCHER a/k/a LINDA S. §
BELCHER a/k/a LINDA STARR a/k/a §
NEWWOMENSPARTY a/k/a §
STITCHENWITCH a/k/a EVA BRAUN §
a/k/a WEB SERGEANT a/k/a KATY a/k/a §
WWW.OBAMACITIZENSHIPDEBATE.ORG §
And §
EDGAR HALE a/k/a JD SMITH, §
And §
CAREN HALE, §
And §
PLAINS RADIO NETWORK, §
a/k/a PLAINS RADIO NETWORK, §
INC. a/k/a §
PLAINS RADIO, §
And §
BAR H FARMS; §
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 41 of 94
And §
KPRN AM 1610; §
And §
DOES 1 through 200 Inclusive §
§
Defendants §
within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391 (b) and the claim for which
2. Above legal action stems from fraudulent use of name and Good Will of
Ostella’s activities.
California 12.23.08
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 42 of 94
5. www.orlytaitzesq.com is not a legal entity and not an a/k/a for Orly Taitz.
6. Orly Taitz, inc is not an a/k/a for Orly Taitz. It is a name of a dental
7. Law offices of Orly Taitz are not an a/k/a for Orly Taitz. It is a name of a
Mexico. Plaintiff’s attorney Philip Berg (Hereinafter Berg) has listed Liberi‘s
does not reside in the state of Pennsylvania nor physically work in Berg’s
legal background related to her own criminal convictions and who assists
Berg occasionally via e-mails, phone and mail sent from her residence in
due to the fact that this is a state where he is licensed to practice law, in
that she was defamed by Orly Taitz, disclosing to the public, Court
printout of Liberi’s convictions of forgery and grand theft. Taitz denies all
allegations and assets that all of the information provided was truthful
California; arresting officer and all of the detectives are in the state of
state of California.
9. Liberi got an eight year term in January 2008 in California, she is currently
Foundation, Taitz has written a cease and desist letter to Ostella, Berg
11. When the above activity did not cease and desist, Taitz has filed a police
12. Liberi, had developed a modus operandi of filing malicious and frivolous
law suits against victims of her criminal behavior, law enforcement and
and in fact she has filed so many frivolous complaints and legal actions
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 44 of 94
County in California and even hospital, where she was treated, that as a
probation department any legal action she is planning to file. If Liberi did
not fulfill her obligation, probation will be revoked and she will be
extradited from New Mexico to California to serve her eight year prison
13. Most of victims of Liberi’s malicious and frivolous law suits reside in the
14. Liberi has gotten a reduction of her prison term to probation due to her
claim of being sick and disabled. Taitz has called District Attorney of San
current case Berg states that Liberi is employed at his office. If indeed
Berg is paying or was paying Liberi a salary or any other payment directly
or indirectly through her husband Brent Liberi, while Liberi was receiving
Security fraud, violation of her probation and would be grounds for her
extradition to California to serve her eight year prison term, which makes
15. Due to the fact, that Liberi was convicted of economic crimes and
card accounts of others, she will be in violation of her probation and will
16. Due to the above, Berg, an attorney for Ostella, Liberi and Adams being
Taitz will file a legal action against his clients and him personally,
dispute at hand, with the sole purpose of harassing and intimidating Taitz
Due to the above defendants respectfully request dismissal of the current action
in the state of Pennsylvania due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction and
personal jurisdiction. Venue was improperly under 28 U.S.C.A. §1391 (b)
Dated 05.21.09.
Seq Defendant Next Court Date Status Agency / Arrest Date Count 1 Charge Violation Date
DR Number
Custody N/A
N/A N/A
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 47 of 94
0 N/A
Arrest Charges
Filed Charges
Infor Charges
Seq Defendant Next Court Date Status Agency / Arrest Date Count 1 Charge Violation Date
DR Number
Custody N/A
N/A N/A
0 N/A
Arrest Charges
Filed Charges
Infor Charges
1) SERVE 26 DAYS IN A SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY JAIL FACILITY, WITH CREDIT FOR
TIME SERVED, A MATTER OF 26 DAYS, PLUS CONDUCT CREDIT PURSUANT TO 1-
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 53 of 94
2) VIOLATE NO LAW.
5) SEEK AND MAINTAIN GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT, OR ATTEND SCHOOL, AND KEEP THE
PROBATION OFFICER INFORMED OF STATUS OF EMPLOYMENT, OR SCHOOL.
17) NEITHER POSSESS NOR USE ANY CREDIT CARD WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE
PROBATION OFFICER.
19) REPORT ALL MOTOR VEHICLES REGISTERED TO YOU TO THE PROBATION OFFICER
WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF ACQUISITION.
23) MAKE RESTITUTION TO THE VICTIM(S) (SEE PROBATION REPORT) IN THE AMOUNT
OF $9223.77 PLUS A 10% ADMINISTRATIVE FEE, TO BE PAID THROUGH CENTRAL
COLLECTIONS
24) MAKE RESTITUTION TO THE VICTIM (SEE PROBATION REPORT) IN THE AM OUNT OF
$35000.00 PLUS A 10% ADMINISTRATIVE FEE, TO BEPAID THROUGH CENTRAL
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 55 of 94
COLLECTIONS
25) MAKE RESTITUTION TO THE VICTIM (SEE PROBATION REPORT) IN THE AMO UNT OF
$66951.08 PLUS A 10% ADMINISTRATIVE FEE, TO BE PAID THROUGH CENTRAL
COLLECTIONS
26) PAY A RESTITUTION FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $200.00, PLUS A TEN PERCENT (10%)
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE THROUGH CENTRAL COLLECTIONS.
27) THE DEFENDANT IS NOT TO FILE ANY LAWSUIT/LEGAL ACTION WITHOUT PRIOR
CONTACT WITH PROBATION OFFICER.
28) DO NOT APPLY FOR CREDIT OR A LOAN WITHOUT PRIOR CONTACT WITH
PROBATION OFFICER.
Tags: birth certificate, crimes Lisa Ostella, eligibility, Lisa Liberi, natural born citizen
This entry was posted on Thursday, May 28th, 2009 at 2:36 am and is filed under Supporting Documentation,
Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are
currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 56 of 94
EXHIBIT “18”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 57 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=1843
** Note, the below emails are fabricated and altered emails all proof of which has been
filed in the lower Court in different pleadings **
« From reader Bob S. Did anyone see Hank Paulson coming out of his house lately?
Re Keyes v Obama »
When I was in Washington DC, I did not have an access to the Internet, as I was visiting the
Director of the Selective Service William Chatfield and offices of several senators and was on
the phone with the assistant and legal counsel for Admiral Malin. A lot of people asked me for
an update and I called Lisa Ostella, the web master ,and asked her to post it on the Internet. As
you can see, the fact that she signed DefendOurfFeedomsFoundations, and she put her name as
an assistant to me, clearly shows that she knew it is my foundation, under my name and
she could sign as an assistant only as long as she was helping me. The moment I transferred to
another webmaster, she had and has no right to advertise on behalf of the DefendOurFreedoms
foundation, solicit donations and pocket the money.
You can also see (in the attachment) that she was the one that contacted the private investigator
Mr. Sankey, and provided him the information that Lisa Liberi , assistant to Phil Berg, has a
criminal record. Based on her report Mr. Sankey has investigated and confirmed this
information, that indeed Lisa Liberi has this lengthy record of forgery of documents and forgery
of an official seal and grand theft. Lisa Ostella changed her tune only after this whole issue with
pay-pal came out. At first she and the rest of the plaintiffs came out with an outrageous lie that
my husband was spying on people. Now they dismissed their law suit against my husband- and
everybody knows that it was a manufactured charge.
As you can see, she was well aware about Liberi’s criminal record, as was Berg and Liberi
herself. Their legal action is nothing but perjury and an attempted obstruction of justice. I have
written in the pleadings that the only address that Liberi provided, was Berg’s office address
and the reason is that she indeed resides in NM and is the Lisa Liberi with the criminal record. I
received an e-mail recently that in the last couple of days Lisa Liberi has gotten a PA drivers
license. If she got one in the last couple of days, that doesn’t change the fact that she resided in
NM and that all of them committed perjury. If anything, getting a PA drivers license now is
yet another attempt to obstruct justice.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 58 of 94
As I have said before, I don’t get intimidated by either Obama or by Berg. One cannot file a
fraudulent and malicious legal action against me and expect to shut me up and make me stop
reporting on illegal and criminal activity. All that these people are doing, is adding counts of
fraud, perjury and obstruction of justice. The only thing Berg can do, is come clean, disassociate
himself from Lisa Liberi, who has a record of forgery and he needs to hire a forensic document
examiner to check all the records handled by Lisa Liberi. We cannot win in court with forged
records. This information was already on the blogs before I got it and it will be on the blogs, his
continuing denial of clear evidence has no merit and undermines everybody in the resistance
movement, everybody who wants to get to the truth. The only way to win, is by clean evidence,
unsealing the vital records and letting the Supreme Court decide the issue of the Natural Born
Citizen.
>
>
> > From: nsankey@thesankeyfirm.com
> > To: lisaostella@hotmail.com
> > Subject: RE: HELLO ??? (again)
> > Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:35:46 -0700
>>
> > Yes but a SEAL !!, and HOW MANY aliases?
>>
> > —–Original Message—–
> > From: Lisa Ostella [mailto:lisaostella@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 3:46 PM
> > To: Neil Sanky
> > Subject: RE: HELLO ??? (again)
>>
> > Insight, such as, Lisa Liberi (Phil Berg’s assistant) really being Lisa
> > Richards, with a police record for ID theft?
>>
> > Mighty convenient talent to have when there are multiple identities flying
> > around.
>>
> > I’ve not researched that insight yet. I didn’t have a warm and fuzzy
> > interaction with (redacted name of volunteer )So I don’t know if this is planted info
droppings
> > or not.
>>
>>
> > Lisa Ostella
> > Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
> > http://defendourfreedoms.org <http://defendourfreedoms.org/>
> > Peace through Strength
> > http://www.barofintegrity.com <http://www.barofintegrity.com/>
>>
This entry was posted on Sunday, May 31st, 2009 at 2:19 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any
responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 60 of 94
EXHIBIT “19”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 61 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?m=200906&paged=7
Update on Berg
I really tried to stay away from the frivolous action by Philip Berg, as I think it is just a
distraction and a waste of my time, however since he filed a legal action and he issues
frequent press releases with outrageous slanderous statements about me, I have to
respond.
This is not the first time Berg brings an action with manufactured allegations. Please
see an attachment below showing Berg being sanctioned by the court and fined over
$10,000 for bringing a frivolous baseless law suit with the sole purpose of harassing the
other party.
In regards to his legal actions- the one that he called a law suit under seal, was actually
not a law suit but a request for Atty. General to file a law suit. It was stating that Obama
is not only not a Natural Born Citizen, but not a citizen at all, which is harder to prove, as
he could’ve become a citizen at any time. The request, filed by Berg, was asking the
Attorney General to take back Obama’s salary of the senator, whereby Berg were to get
a certain percentage of it, as a whistleblower. I was just skeptical about the viability of
such a request.
In regards to two other legal actions he filed, they were dismissed and from January
Berg was saying that he has an oral argument scheduled for May. The month of May
came and went and there was no argument and nobody could find any such argument
scheduled on the docket. Now he is saying that there is an argument scheduled for
September-October, but again nobody can find anything scheduled.
The only law suit he has going, is one with slanderous allegations against me and his
only occupation as of late has been issuing outrageous press releases about me and
asking for money so he can slander me some more and can file more law suits against
me. It is just despicable that Berg, who was sanctioned by the court and fined for
bringing frivolous action with the sole purpose of harassment is calling to have me
disbarred, that Berg, who is employing Lisa Liberi, a convicted criminal, with 10 felony
convictions of grand theft, forgery of documents and forgery of seal (see record
attached), is accusing others of forgery and fraud, including a licensed investigator with
20 years of experience in Scotland Yard and over 15 years of experience, Mr. Sankey,
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 62 of 94
a Christian minister and editor of Christian publishing Pastor James Sundquist, a radio
station, a talk show host, the wife of a talk show host and even their own volunteer. I
have attached a copy of the second amended motion to dismiss due to lack of
jurisdiction. I was asked –what does it mean. You are supposed to file such a motion
first, as if there is no jurisdiction the case is dismissed right then and there before it
goes any further. I hope Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania judge Eduardo Robreno
will dismiss this case shortly.
I have also included a list of legal actions and initiatives I am currently spearheading. I
am asking for your support and follow up with governmental officials. I firmly believe that
unsealing of Obama’s records is only a first step in the direction of the true transparency
in government, that there is a long way ahead in turning around this economy. It will not
improve with empty slogans of hope and change and wasting billions of dollars on un-
stimulating stimulus, which stimulates only the printing press, that prints funny money,
which soon will be less valuable then money from Toys R Us. This economy will not
change and improve by giving billions to the thugs from Acorn, the thugs from Hamas
and the crooks from AIG transferring 59% of the stimulus to stimulate foreign banks.
We will achieve true economic growth and improvement, when we realize that the free
market economy benefitted only a few billioners, It bankrupted this whole country. We
need to go back to sanity, we need balanced trade, we need balanced budget for each
and every state and the country in general, we need to fight governmental corruption,
we need to start producing again. This is a monumental task. It will take more then one
or two lawyers to make a difference. It will take each and every one of you working 24/7
to turn this country around. Please go through the list. I need a couple of volunteers to
go through the earlier posts and insert the contact info for the officials. Please, form
lobbying groups and don’t take no for an answer. We need to reach each and every law
enforcement and governmental official and we need to make all of them accountable.
Any official, who violates the Constitution and his oath of office and allows fraud and
treason, will be held accountable by the citizens of this country. Please join 4th of July
tea parties and September 12-13 Nation Renewal million men march on Washington. I
will be speaking there.
Lawyer Slapped With $10K in Sanctions for ‘Laundry List of Unethical Actions’
Shannon P. Duffy
The Legal Intelligencer
July 25, 2005
Printer-friendly Email this Article Reprints & Permissions
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 63 of 94
Finding that a Pennsylvania lawyer had committed a “laundry list of unethical actions,” a federal
judge has imposed more than $10,000 in sanctions and ordered the lawyer to complete six hours
of ethics training.
U.S. District Judge J. Curtis Joyner’s 10-page opinion in Holsworth v. Berg is packed with
criticism of the conduct of attorney Philip Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa.
“Other attorneys should look to Mr. Berg’s actions as a blueprint for what not to do when
attempting to effectively and honorably perform the duties of the legal profession,” Joyner wrote.
“This court has grown weary of Mr. Berg’s continuous and brazen disrespect toward this court
and his own clients. Mr. Berg’s actions … are an enormous waste of judicial time and resources
that this court cannot, in good conscience, allow to go unpunished,” Joyner wrote.
In the suit, Berg is accused of legal malpractice by former clients who claim his failure to
respond to an ERISA claim against them led to a default judgment.
But the sanctions against Berg stem from his decision to file a third-party counterclaim of fraud
against a pension fund that had sued his former clients, according to court papers.
Joyner blasted Berg for filing the fraud claim, calling it an “irresponsible decision” because the
claim was “utterly barren of any scintilla of legal principles.”
In the ERISA suit, Berg’s former clients — Richard Holsworth and his company, Richard’s
General Contracting — were sued by a group of pension funds led by the Carpenters Health and
Welfare Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity.
Carpenters Health claimed that Holsworth and his company had failed to make required payment
of fringe benefit contributions.
According to court papers, Joyner found that Berg “neglected to file a response to [Carpenter
Health's] claim or provide any legal defense whatsoever for his client.”
Even after a default judgment was entered against Holsworth, Joyner found that Berg “remained
silent.”In April 2002 — two months after the default judgment was granted and 11 months after
the suit was first filed — Joyner found that Berg “broke his silence” by filing a petition to strike
the judgment or to open the default judgment.
Berg’s motion was rejected and a default judgment of more than $5,300 was entered against his
clients.The judgment swelled to more than $10,000 when Carpenters Health later successfully
moved for a supplemental judgment to recover more than $4,700 in attorney fees for its efforts in
responding to Berg’s untimely motions.
Holsworth and his wife later filed a legal malpractice suit against Berg in the Philadelphia
County Court of Common Pleas, alleging that Berg negligently failed to represent them in the
Carpenters Health case.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 64 of 94
A year later, in February 2005, Berg moved to join Carpenters Health as a third-party defendant
in the malpractice suit, demanding more than $20,000 in damages.
In his counterclaim, Berg alleged that the ERISA suit filed by Carpenters Health in 2001, which
led to the malpractice claim against him, was “a fraud upon the court and a fraudulent taking
from the Holsworths.”
Carpenter Health’s lawyers removed the case to federal court and filed a motion to dismiss the
claim.Joyner agreed, finding that Berg’s fraud claim was “frivolous” and was motivated by an
intent “to harass Carpenters Health and the Holsworths, as well as to delay and disrupt the
administration of justice.”
The claim was fatally flawed, Joyner found, because Berg had no standing to bring suit against
Carpenters Health and had “failed to conduct even a minimally reasonable inquiry before filing
his complaint.”
Granting summary judgment in favor of Carpenters Health, Joyner said he found it “wholly
unnecessary” even to consider the facts of the ERISA case because it was “abundantly clear” that
Carpenters Health was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.
Joyner invited Carpenters Health to file a motion for Rule 11 sanctions. When it did, Joyner
found that Berg “continued his trend of unprofessional conduct by, once again, failing to file a
timely response.”
In a footnote, Joyner said Berg’s response to the sanctions motion was due on May 26. In a
phone call to chambers on May 31, Joyner said, Berg’s assistant requested permission to move
for an extension of time, saying Berg had been out of town for two or three weeks and would not
be returning until June 9.
Joyner said he agreed to accept such a request if it were filed the next day, but none was.
Instead, Joyner said, a letter signed by Berg’s assistant was faxed to chambers on June 2,
requesting that the deadline be extended until June 27.
Joyner said he refused because “in light of Mr. Berg’s persistent and repeated neglect of his
professional obligations, this court was not inclined to permit Mr. Berg to further delay the
review of Carpenters Health’s ripe motion.”
In a June 2 opinion, Joyner found that Berg had violated Rule 11 by “filing a complaint
completely devoid of any basis in fact or law, as would be apparent to any reasonable attorney
after the slightest inquiry.”
Berg’s fraud claim, Joyner said, was “inadequately pled, not grounded in fact, time-barred, and
utterly irrelevant to the pending malpractice action against him.”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 65 of 94
In his sanctions order, Joyner ordered Berg to reimburse Carpenters Health the $10,668 in
attorney fees and costs it incurred in defending the claim. He also ordered Berg to complete six
credits of ethics courses certified by the Pennsylvania Board of Continuing Legal Education, and
recommended that Berg be investigated by the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Committee on
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility.
On June 16, Berg filed a motion for reconsideration urging that the sanctions imposed on him
should be forgiven due to “extenuating circumstances,” including health problems, a three-week
European business trip and financial difficulties.
Berg conceded in his brief that “there were numerous procedural errors, untimely responses and
omissions,” but said he “did not do so with intention or defiance.”
Joyner flatly rejected the motion, saying “in no way, shape or form do the ‘extenuating
circumstances’ proffered by Mr. Berg even begin to justify, excuse, or explain his unprofessional
and unethical course of conduct throughout this matter. These transparent excuses are not only
patently insufficient to meet the legal standard for a motion for reconsideration, they are
insulting to this court and demeaning to the legal profession.”
Berg, reached in his office, declined to comment on Joyner’s decision except to say that he is
considering whether to file an appeal.
Carpenters Health was represented by attorneys Sanford G. Rosenthal and Eric B. Meyer of
Jennings Sigmond.
It has long been the case that the jurisdiction of the Court depends upon the state
of things at the time of the action brought.” Mollan v. Torrance, 22 U.S. 537, 9
Wheat. 537, 539, 6 L. Ed. 154 (1824). This time-of-filing rule is hornbook law
(quite literally) [*571] taught to first-year law students in any basic course on
federal civil procedure. It measures all challenges to subject-matter jurisdiction
premised upon diversity of citizenship against the state of facts that existed at the
time of filing–whether the challenge be brought shortly after filing, after the trial,
or even for the first time on appeal. (Challenges to subject-matter jurisdiction can
of course be raised at any time prior to final judgment. See Capron v. Van
Noorden, 6 U.S. 126, 2 Cranch 126, 2 L. Ed. 229 (1804).
Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L.P., 541 U.S. 567 at 570-71; 124 S.Ct. 1920 at 1924;
158 L.Ed.2d 866 at 872 (2004).
Without wishing to minimize the appearance created by the volume of paperwork filed to
date in this above-entitled-and-numbered civil action, the case ends here or it ought to. Count
One is labeled as and would apparently pretend to be a federal cause of action, in its title only,
but it is at best a California statutory suit for violation of privacy, and must accordingly be
evaluated, for subject matter jurisdiction, under the same diversity of citizenship analysis applied
to the state-labeled Counts Two through Six.
The only colorable basis for Federal Court subject matter jurisdiction over the state-law
“substance” (without conceding, in fact, that there is any substance) of Counts Two (Complaint
p. 66 ¶¶158-166: “Defemation[sic], per se, Slander and Libel”), Three (Complaint p. 69, ¶¶167-
173: False-Light Invasion of Privacy), Four (Complaint p. 72, §§174-181: “Harassment”), Five
(Complaint p. 75, ¶¶182-189: “False Designations and Descriptions of Facts”), and Six
alleged in paragraph 1 on page 4 of the original (and only) Complaint, filed in this case on May
4, 2009.
All of these “Counts” are woefully insufficient as a matter of competent federal practice
and pleading, but none of these counts contain even the suggestion of a conceivable much less
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 67 of 94
plausible cause of action arising under Federal Law, so diversity is the only imaginable basis for
jurisdiction and the federal standards for diversity are neither novel nor difficult to apply: the
Complaint reveals on its face that “complete diversity of citizenship” between Plaintiffs and
Defendants simply does not exist, and cannot be cured by amendment because jurisdiction is
established by the case initial “snapshot” of the parties, not later changes.
Dr. Orly Taitz admits that she is a dentist, by primary profession, and although admitted
to practice in the State of California and several federal courts, she is not primarily a litigator.
Defendant also admits that “ignorance of the law is no excuse,” but would nevertheless submit
that “A party cannot inadvertently or intentionally (e.g. by agreement) waive its right to object to
Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee, 456 U.S. 694 at 702, 102 S.Ct. 2099 at 2104 (1982). And
since Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. 267, 3 Cranch 267, 2 L.Ed. 435 (decided February 13,
1806), the United States Supreme Court has read the statutory formulation “between . . . citizens
of different States,” 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1), to require complete diversity between all plaintiffs
and all defendants. So, every other objection and contention the parties have made up to this
point set aside, the case ends here, for the following reasons which Defendant Dr. Orly Taitz
On the first (title) page of Philip J. Berg’s Complaint for Damages, with Jury Trial
Demanded, filed on May 4, 2009, and never amended or otherwise superceded, Lisa M. Ostella
and Go Excel Global are identified as Plaintiffs while James Sundquist and Rock Salt Publishing
are identified as Defendants. In paragraphs 8 and 9 on page 5 of the May 4, 2009, complaint,
Lisa M. Ostella is identified as residing at 2227 US Highway 1, #245, North Brunswick, New
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 68 of 94
Jersey 08902-4402 with her principal place of business at the offices of Plaintiff Go Excel
Sundquist and his principal place of business Rock Salt Publishing are identified as having a
business address of 551 Valley Road, Suite 123, Upper Montclair, New Jersey 07043.
The undersigned Defendant has previously argued and submitted evidence that Plaintiff
Lisa Liberi should be deemed a citizen of California for purposes of diversity, on account of her
long-time residence and criminal history and multiple convictions and status as a probationer in
Defendant Orly Taitz’ home state[1]. While Defendant still contends that her analysis of Lisa
correct, it is upon reflection mere surplusage, at this point, because the paired Plaintiffs Lisa
Ostella and her Go Excel Global, when paired against the paired Defendants James Sundquist
and his Rock Salt Publishing, as identified and described expressly and explicitly ON THE
contention of “complete diversity.” Even if Defendants Dr. Orly Taitz and her “Defend Our
confessed the well-pled allegations (if any) of the Plaintiffs’ Complaint, such a default is not and
cannot be taken as a waiver of objections to subject matter jurisdiction. Without subject matter
jurisdiction, which can only be established by the well-pled allegations of Plaintiffs’ Complaint,
this United States District Court is entirely without power to proceed, to entertain any part of
For purposes of the present motion, Defendant Dr. Orly Taitz submits that the Plaintiffs
have failed even to identify any actual or conceivable Federal question Causes of Action in their
May 4, 2009, Complaint, and are thus subject to Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Rule
12(c). Much less have the Plaintiffs actually pled any plausible Federal Causes of Action with
anything approaching the specificity required by Rule 12(b)(6) as construed and applied under
the Supreme Court’s latest evaluation Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544; 127 S. Ct. 1955 at
1964-65; 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007). In fact, it is fair to say, paraphrasing the language of
Twombly, that the Plaintiffs Liberi et al. have not even made the conclusory allegations, or
sufficient factual allegations to identify the “labels and conclusions” necessary to constitute a
“formulaic recitation of the elements of any causes of action” arising under Federal statutes or
jurisprudence, whatsoever. Count One, as noted above, is basically a “sham” based on a content-
free title including two Constitutional Amendments not mentioned again in any paragraph.
In relation to Counts Two through Six, which bear state court “labels” and little else
suggesting any theory of recovery at all, there are repeated but vague references to Defendants’
“posting and distributing Liberi’s social security number” and then, on page 73, ¶180, that
“Defendants have acted unlawfully and in violation of” several federal statutes without more in
the way of material factual allegations. Such sloppy “pleading” was not permitted in Federal
Court prior to Twombly, but it is clearly frivolous and sanctionable now after the Supreme
This leaves COUNT ONE of Plaintiffs’ May 4, 2009, Complaint, at page 60, ¶¶ 144-157
for analysis. “COUNT ONE” is entitled “VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AND FOURTEENTH
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION”. While the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United
States Constitution would appear to frame federal issues, no federal civil rights (nor any other)
statutes are cited until paragraph 157. In fact, no statutes or case law authorities are cited until
paragraph 151, and the subsequent paragraphs focus exclusively on California Civil Code
providing possible grounds or factual frameworks for liability or recovery. Accordingly the
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 70 of 94
TITLE of Count One should be disregarded, and judgment entered on the pleadings in this case
pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or in the alternative under
12(b)(6) because no conceivable Federal law theories of recovery are stated or even identified in
Count One.
As in paragraph 180 on page 73, discussed above, paragraph 157 on pages 63-64 contains
random citations to several federal laws, but the factual allegations of this paragraph are so
vague, conclusory, and general, without reference to any specific outline of any causes of action
recognized or established by federal law, that there is no substantial basis for the exercise of
federal question jurisdiction. Count One may contain more “Federal Words” in its title than the
other counts of Plaintiffs’ May 4, 2009 complaint, but it does not contain more “Federal
Substance” and should be dismissed along with Counts Two through Six as an attempt to utilize
federal diversity jurisdiction to sue and impose liability under what is, at the absolute most,
examining the Complaint in the light most favorable to the Plaintiffs, as nothing more nor less
By:________________________________
Dr. Orly Taitz, pro se
Defendant, in propia persona and on behalf
of Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, Inc..
Dr. Orly Taitz, President,
26302 La Paz, Suite 211
Mission Viejo, California 92691
Seq Defendant Next Court Status Agency / Arrest Date Count 1 Violation Date
Date DR Number Charge
1 LIBERI , LISA RA 05/18/2001 PC 115(A) 05/18/2001
R 110013759
ALIAS: LIBERI, LISA R
ALIAS: COURVILLERICHARDSON, LISA
ALIAS: LIBERI, LISA A
ALIAS: RICHARDSON, LISA C
ALIAS: COURVILLERICH, LISA
ALIAS: LIBERI, LISA RENEE
ALIAS: LIBERI, LISA
ALIAS: RICHARDSON, LISA RENEE
Custody N/A
Filing Type Held to Answer Filing Date 05/09/2003
Ordered Bail $0.00 Posted Bail $0.00
D.A. James R. Secord Defense Dean Pitcl (Court Appointed)
Next Action: Deputy Report #: RA-RC 110013759
Arrest Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Plea Status
Date
5. James et al v Obama demand for Quo Warranto submitted to the US attorney for the DC
Jeffrey a Taylor, who has resigned. Demand for the new acting US attorney for the DC to
file Quo Warranto against Obama
6. Quo Warranto demand was submitted to Atty gen. Eric Holder. A phone call was
received stating that the Dossiers were forwarded to the Criminal division of the DOJ.
7. Pro Hac Vice appearance was made on behalf of Jody Brockhausen and a complaint was
filed with the US attorney for the western District of TX for criminal Matters Richard
Durbin and assistant US atty Chris Peel.
8. 8 dossiers describing suspected illegal activity perpetrated by Obama and his supporters
was submitted to Holder
9. Request for criminal investigation of Obama’s Selective Service Certificate and
Certification of Live Birth with numerous signs of perjury was forwarded to the
Beaumont police (Obama campaigned in Beaumont) on behalf of a number of clients.
10. After the chief of Beaumont police told officer Dischler not to investigate, due to the fact
that it is a political issue and after the officer was threatened that the Chief of Police will
investigate him, a criminal complaint was forwarded to the US attorney for the Eastern
District of TX Rebeccah Gregory. Ms. Gregory resigned, the complained will be handled
by the successor.
11. Copy of the complaint was forwarded to Governor Perry on May 5th. On May 6th the
legal counselor for the governor referred us to the DA of Jefferson County Tom Manness.
12. All of the dossiers and the complaint were forwarded to DA Manness and Chief
investigator Rose as well as the San Antonio DA Susan Reed.
13. Dossiers were either hand delivered by me or sent by certified mail to each and every
member of the Senate Judicial committee, as well as Senator Thune of Armed Services
Committee and Senator Grassley of Finance Committee and Senator Feinstein, who was
the chair of Intelligence committee.
14. Dossiers were forwarded to Robert Mueller –director of FBI
15. Dossiers were forwarded to Mark Sullivan, Director of Secret service
16. Dossiers were forwarded to Captain James Crawford, legal counselor for Admiral Mike
Mallin, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of staff (response is expected shortly)
17. Dossiers were forwarded to Steven Whitlock, director of the whistle blower office of the
IRS
18. Dossiers were forwarded to the SSA, a phone call was received in April, advising that
the analyst is working on the matter and a response will be arriving in 2 weeks. It was not
received yet.
19. Addressed the issue with Justice Scalia on March 9th.
20. Addressed the issue with Chief Justice Roberts on March 13th.
21. 15 trips were made to lobby elected and appointed officials in different states to review
the issue of Obama’s eligibility for presidency
22. Over a 100 radio shows and numerous TV shows, documentaries and newspaper and
magazine articles were done to bring awareness to the issue of lack of eligibility of
Obama for the presidency of the US.
23. During the meeting with the KY assistant secretary of state a letter was written by the
assistant secretary of state to the Attorney General of the state, requesting to verify
Obama’s eligibility
24. 4 TN state representatives joined the legal action to unseal Obama’s eligibility
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 75 of 94
[1] Lisa Liberi remains under the continuing jurisdiction of the Superior Court of the State of California for the
County of San Bernardino in connection with her probation or parole status in Case No: FSB-044914 (Judge John
M. Pachecho), and whether this is determinative of her citizenship for diversity purposes or not, it seems more than
casually significant that Judge John M. Pacheco, in allowing Lisa Liberi to post bail bonds and be released from
custody stated on the record, in open court on August 4, 2004:
“Having said all that, Ms. Liberi, if you don’t come back here [“here” meaning to California Superior Court
whenever required by the terms of her probation] the mud is going to be on my face that I allowed all this to
happen.” Defendant Lisa Liberi responded “I will be here, your Honor. I have made every court appearance.” The
issue concerning the citizenship of parolees and probationers is not well-settled, but would seem to favor “last
residence prior to sentencing” as the residence of the probationer/parolee, which in this case would definitely be
California.
Under the diversity jurisdiction statute, the federal courts have original jurisdiction to decide a plaintiff’s state-
law lawsuit if the dispute “is between . . . citizens of different States.” See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). A party’s
“citizenship” for purposes of federal jurisdiction is determined by looking to the person’s domicile. See Crowley v.
Glaze, 710 F.2d 676, 678 (10th Cir. 1983). Domicile, in turn, is determined by finding the last place where a person
resided with an intention of remaining there indefinitely. See Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490
U.S. 30, 48, 104 L. Ed. 2d 29, 109 S. Ct. 1597 (1989) (”For adults, domicile is established by physical presence in a
place in connection with a certain state of mind concerning one’s intent to remain there.”); Crowley, 710 F.2d at 678
(”To effect a change in domicile, two things are indispensable: First residence in a new domicile, and second, the
intention to remain there indefinitely.”).
It is obviously true that an adult can freely and intentionally change her residence for purposes of diversity
jurisdiction as a matter of fundamental right, but prisoners, probationers, and parolees ordinarily lose the right to
determine their own citizenship. Lisa Liberi does not have complete freedom to sever her ties to California, and in
fact she has promised NOT to do so, as shown in the above quoted lines from the Reporter’s Transcript of the
August 4, 2004, hearing in San Bernardino Superior Court Case No.: FSB-44914. page 122, to which this Defendant
Some courts have recognized that the restrictions on the liberty of a prisoner affect the determination of the
prisoner’s domicile because domicile is a voluntary status. See Sullivan v. Freeman, 944 F.2d 334, 337 (7th Cir.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 76 of 94
1991). As a result, courts have applied a presumption that when a prisoner has been moved out-of-state by prison
officers, the prisoner’s citizenship for diversity purposes is the state where he was domiciled before he was
imprisoned. See id.; see also Ferrer v. Dailey, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33322, No. 96-3155, 1996 WL 731618, at *1
(10th Cir. Dec. 20, 1996) (unpublished Order & Judgment) (”For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, when an
inmate has been forcibly incarcerated in another state, the state of citizenship ’should be the state of which he was
a citizen before he was sent to prison unless he plans to live elsewhere when he gets out, in which event it should be
that state.‘”) (quoting Singletary v. Continental Ill. Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 9 F.3d 1236, 1238 (7th Cir. 1993)). This
presumption, however, is rebuttable upon a showing of sufficient facts to indicate that a prisoner has both residence
and present intent to remain indefinitely in a new state. See Sullivan, 944 F.2d at 337.
EXHIBIT “20”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 78 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=2522
« Previous Post
You mentioned Everett, Wash. connection with Barack Obama’s mother’s family. Just
wondering if you knew that connection went back for over a century…
http://www.heraldnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081026/NEWS01/710269867
So with a POTUS with a Muslim father and German roots mother, why shouldn’t Israelis be
worried?
Cheers
Response
I am really concerned about several coincidences
1. a man who threatened to shoot me and burn my body for the world to see was tracked to a
computer server in Everett WA. Another person that threatened me was traced to Chauhelis WA
and yet another one to Canada (from what I understand not far from the border with WA state).
A few days after the threat there was a clamp missing and a disconnected fumes emissions hose
in my car and my husbands car died, suddenly a fuse was missing.
2. Obama does not talk about it, but his mother wasn’t in HI when he was a baby, she was
enrolled in the U of Seattle WA from August 1961-till June 1962, which means that as a baby he
lived in WA.
3. Lisa Liberi, assistant for Berg, who has a lengthy criminal record of grand theft, forgery
of documents and forgery of official seal doesn’t talk about it, but according to records she
was born in WA state. From what I recall Bellview WA. (her name at birth was Lisa
Richardson. From what I recall father -Jack Richardson, mother Shirley Wadell)
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 79 of 94
4. Obama, Liberi and Obama’s mother Stanley Ann Dunham- all have multiple social
security numbers according to databases.
5. Liberi was convicted of forgery of documents and according to experts, there are
multiple signs of forgery in Obama’s documents.
6. Stanley Ann Dunham also went by the name Shirley Ann Dunham.
We found a Dunham organization, owned by Shirley Ann Dunham; one location was in
Seattle another in Bellview WA. They dealt with insurances, lawyers, mortgages- you can
get ss numbers from all of these records.
7. From what I recall, there was a discrepancy between Intellius records and Secretary of state
records. According to the sec. of state a man owned that co. One of our volunteers pulled court
records in Bellview for the Dunham organization. This man, Mr. Dunham (don’t remember first
name) kept changing his middle initial in several court cases, which was suspicious by itself.
8. There was a very strange newspaper article in WA (I believe Seattle), from what I recall, when
Obama supposedly was in Columbia. It stated that one, Roman Obama studied at the university
of Patrice Lumumba in Moscow, Russia, and had some financial difficulties.
9. When grandma Dunham got sick, a reporter from WA (I believe Seattle) has writen an
interview with Charles Payne, saying the grandma got a broken hip. She was dead of cancer a
few days later. I was wondering, why did it come out in WA, and not HI or IL?
10. Based on all of the above, I have a nagging feeling, that there is somebody there in WA,
some relative of Obama, somebody who we might think is no longer with us.
This entry was posted on Monday, June 22nd, 2009 at 3:35 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow
any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
[emphasis added]
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 80 of 94
EXHIBIT “21”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 81 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=2579
« Update MI
I am back from PA. Very Important. »
1. The First Amendment provides that “Congress shall make no law… abridging the
freedom… of the press,” and it is “no longer open to doubt that the liberty of the press, and of
speech, is within the liberty safeguarded by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 82 of 94
from invasion by state action.” Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson, 283 U.S. 697, 707 (1931). See
also Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 244 (1936). The United States Supreme
Court has interpreted these guarantees to afford special protection against orders that prohibit the
“previous” or “prior” restraint on speech. None of the Supreme Court’s decided cases on prior
restraint involved restrictive orders entered to protect a convicted forger’s history of convictions
for forgery, but the opinions on prior restraint have a common thread relevant to this case.
2. “Prior restraints on speech and publication are the most serious and the least tolerable
Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376, 390, 37 L.Ed. 2d 669, 93 S.Ct. 2553 (1973): a prior restraint
should not “sweep” any “more broadly than necessary”. As such, the Constitution forbids prior
restraint on freedom of publication in the press, media, all together. See Carroll v. President and
Comm’rs of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175, 183-184, 21 L.Ed.2d 325, 89 S.Ct. 347 (1968).
3. Any “order” issued in “the area of First Amendment rights” must be “precise” and
narrowly “tailored” to achieve the “pin-pointed objective” of the “needs of the case”. Tory v.
Cochran, 544 U.S. 734, 738 125 S. Ct. 2108, 2111; 161 L.Ed.2d 1042, 1048 (2005); see
also Board of Airport Comm’rs of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569, 575, 577,
96 L.Ed.2d 500, 107 S.Ct. 2568 (1987) (regulation prohibiting “all ‘First Amendment activities’”
substantially overbroad).
4. The Plaintiffs’ June 23, 2009, proposed order in this case is laughably unspecific and
Defendants’ commentary on the world-wide web, with the Court enrolled as enforcing referee.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 83 of 94
5. Nearly two months have passed since the filing of Plaintiffs’ complaint, and both the title
and substance of Philip J. Berg’s latest “ex-parte” motion confirm, demonstrate, and reaffirm that
there are no recently developing emergencies or exigent circumstances which compel action at
the present time, if any action were ever warranted at all (cf., e.g., Tory v. Cochran, 544 U.S.
734 (supra).
6. Plaintiffs’ requests for injunctions when aligned and evaluated against their somewhat
lame and insubstantial recitations of alleged past misconduct are non-sensical, because Plaintiffs
Liberi, Berg, et al. make no allegations and offer no evidence of any ongoing defamation or
publication of private facts, and in particular, none that have arisen since the initiation of their
present Suit to Limit Access to Public Proceedings (e.g. “SLAPP”) filed May 4, 2009.
7. Historically, defamatory speech and disclosure of private facts of adults are immunized
from legislative or executive censorship, as well as judicial injunctive relief (known as “prior
restraint”) in the United States. If false statements are made, which result in injury, damages are
8. All of the substantive requests, including but not limited to the key phrase in the proposed
order submitted to this Court on June 23, 2009, “Defendants’ Orly Taitz … Defend our
Freedoms Foundation… [….and] …all parties acting on their behalf are enjoined from
airing and/or publishing any defamatory or false statements”, and 100% of Defendants’
request for injunctive relief concerns expressive activity, specifically Defendants’ activities as
purveyors of truthful information through the electronic media communications over the “world-
9. As the United States Supreme Court articulated 33 years ago this month (June 30, 1976)
in Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539; 96 S.Ct. 2791; 49 L.Ed.2d 683, 697-98
(1976):
10. In that same case (Nebraska v. Stuart) the Supreme Court set out an analytical and
procedural test for prior restraint on expressive activities which has been widely followed
throughout the United States. Under this test, a prior restraint on expression is presumptively
unconstitutional. With this concept in mind, the court adopts the following test: a [injunctive]
order in civil judicial proceedings will withstand constitutional scrutiny only where there are
specific findings supported by evidence that (1) an imminent and irreparable harm to the judicial
process will deprive litigants of a just resolution of their dispute, and (2) the judicial action
represents the least restrictive means to prevent that harm. See, for example, the Texas Supreme
11. Defendants suggest that this Court specifically adopt the Texas four part rendition of the
Nebraska v. Stuart test, in that several of the Defendants in this case are in fact from Texas and
would be entitled to such protection if they had been sued “at home”:
Concerned that public prejudice could prevent impanelling of a jury, a trial judge
issued an order restraining the news media from publishing any information about
a murder suspect in Nebraska Press Ass’n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. at 542-43. The
United States Supreme Court invalidated the order as an unconstitutional prior
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 85 of 94
restraint, noting that: (1) the underlying basis was too speculative; (2) less
restrictive alternatives were not investigated; (3) no evidence was presented that
the prior restraint would have in fact achieved its purpose; and (4) the order was
overbroad. Id. at 562-69. These conclusions are quite fact specific, id. at 569, and
thus only serve to reinforce a presumption that prior restraints, including those
directed at media publication, are unconstitutional.
12. “A responsible press has always been regarded as the handmaiden of effective judicial
administration, especially in the criminal field. Its function in this regard is documented by an
impressive record of service over several centuries. The press does not simply publish
information about trials but guards against the miscarriage of justice by subjecting the police,
prosecutors, and judicial processes to extensive public scrutiny and criticism.” Sheppard v.
13. Censorship of the press was, quite simply, one of the primary and central evils brought
over the water from monarchical and ecclesiastical domination in Europe against which the First
Amendment was enacted and adopted by Congress and the original 13 states. As the Court
recited in its historical summary in Nebraska Press Ass’n v. Stuart, supra: in Patterson v.
Colorado ex rel. Attorney General, 205 U.S. 454, 462 (1907): “[T]he main purpose of [the First
Amendment] is ‘to prevent all such previous restraints upon publications as had been practiced
by other governments.’” Defendant Dr. Orly Taitz was born in a country, the Soviet Union, in
which restraints on freedom of expression were ubiquitous and constituted a constant feature of
everyday life.
14. All content-based prior restraints on the dissemination of information by and through the
free media or “press” by judicial injunction constitute a form of “censorship” of free expression
which are subject to strict scrutiny and a very important series of safeguards outlined by the
Supreme Court for this central, core of First Amendment Protections. Lisa Liberi and Philip
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 86 of 94
Berg completely and callously ignore, in their memorandum, the fact that the entire thrust of the
injunctive relief they seek is focused on the suppression of freedom of speech and
communication about a topic of general public interest in the free press and open media. They
do not cite in their memorandum of law a single First Amendment case nor any other authority
which would show them entitled to any relief of any kind whatsoever.
15. All of the pleadings filed by the plaintiffs in this case were done with the sole reason to
harass Defendant Dr. Orly Taitz and other defendants and try to keep them silent about the fact
that Berg’s assistant Liberi has a criminal record, specifically criminal record of forgery of
documents, which casts doubt on documents Berg has submitted to this honorable court as well
the Supreme court, as the documents were prepared or at least handled by a convicted document
forger. This is a matter of public concern and public interest as well as a legitimate topic of press
16. Lisa Liberi has (in California Courts) demonstrated a pattern of filing frivolous legal
actions and motions, having filed groundless actions against police officers, district attorney, the
judge and the county solely to obtain leverage in her own criminal actions, or for other improper
purposes.
17. Philip J. Berg has shown the same pattern of filing frivolous and fraudulent actions and
was fined by US District Judge J. Curtis Joyner more then $10,000 for bringing legal actions
“utterly barren of any scintilla of legal principles”. In his opinion Judge Joyner has stated “This
court has grown weary of Mr. Berg’s continuous disregard and brazen disrespect toward this
court and his own clients. Mr. Berg’s actions …are an enormous waste of judicial time and
resources that this court cannot, in good conscience, allow to go unpunished”. In this action Berg
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 87 of 94
has filed hundreds of pages of pleadings without a scintilla of proof or legal theory upon which
18. This opposition to motion for emergency injunction and or restraining order is filed with
full reservation of rights, as the defendants are awaiting the ruling on their second amended
19. Due to the fact that not one but several serious questions concerning the existing either of
Federal Question or Diversity jurisdiction over this case, Defendants reserve their right to plead
further in opposition to Plaintiffs’ request for “emergency injunctive relief” if this Court should
20. However, the question of the Court’s power to proceed does and should indeed precedes
any other issues of litigation and due to the fact that the defendants were harassed by hundreds
and hundreds of pages of pleadings and premature demands for discovery, even though the
defendants are waiting for the ruling on jurisdiction, the defendants respectfully request a stay on
all other proceedings and filing of subsequent motions and pleadings until there is a ruling on
jurisdiction.
Respectfully submited
[1] Such as Defendant Orly Taitz’ reports on the CLOSED (not ongoing) legal proceedings
involving Lisa Liberi.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 24th, 2009 at 12:19 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow
any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 89 of 94
EXHIBIT “22”
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 90 of 94
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=2585
« Unfortunately I have to spend more time on Berg’s latest motion, I have to provide a response
Next Post »
I returned yesterday at 12:30 and and was doing a radio show in VA with Chuck Chrismayer.
You can reach him at 800-754-1822 or 804-677-2783, he will have archives of the show.
I had to work from 1-5:30 and later wanted to have dinner and spend some time with my family.
In regards to Berg things are going well. Judge denied all of his motions for default judgment
against me and clerical default was lifted, he gave me a pro hac vice to represent my foundation,
denied all of Berg’s motions for injunction against me and, what is most important he ordered
Berg to show cause, why his case should not be dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction. For those
of you, who are not attorneys, it is a very good sign that the judge is very inclined to dismiss
Berg’s case due to lack of jurisdiction. I would like to explain that if the case is filed out of state,
the first thing that is being reviewed, is jurisdiction. It doesn’t mean that the case has any merit
aside from jurisdiction, it means that this court cannot hear it. I believe Berg filed it in PA to
simply cause me to waste time and money, going to Philly. At any rate, I am not concerned about
this frivolous law suit, I am though concerned about something else.
On the plane to Philly I read hundreds of pages of transcripts in criminal case hearings of Liberi.
Keep in mind that recently I had threats “to shoot me and burn my body for the world to see”.
Later a clamp was missing and fumes emissions hose was disconnected in my car, that lead to
the fumes accumulating around the engine, which is extremely dangerous.
At that time DA James Secord asked the detective to explain. The detective stated that a contract
will be issued on such person, a green light and such person will be attacked and/ or killed. He
mentioned that 5 people were killed last year alone. I got concerned, if this woman could plan
a hit, a contract on her own sister, it would not be inconceivable that she would plan a hit on an
attorney and her family, if this attorney outed her. I kept reading and found out that indeed less
then a year later her sister was dead. Official cause of death, from what I understand, is drug
overdose. However, drug overdose can be self inflicted or inflicted by others.
At this time I would like to know if there are any pathologists among the readers of this blog?
Can someone go to the police department and probation department in Santa Fe NM and show
them all this info.
According to detective Teresa Standiford from Orange County economic crimes unit, my report
and the whole file was transferred to Santa Fe, as Lisa Liberi lives there. I tried to find out the
status, but it is very hard to reach anybody in the police department there. The phone number of
detective Teresa Standford in CA 714-647-7486, 714-647-7038. Case # 09-068339.
In Santa Fe I was given a number for detective Martin Lopez 505-955-5010, General number for
the Santa Fe police is 505-955-5038. Investigations unit- 505-955-5038
The supervisor of her probation department is Joan Martinez 505-476-2359 Regional probation
officer is Rose Bobchack 505-476-2363.
After the hearing on Thursday I talked to Phil Berg and I have shown him the transcripts of
Liberi’s prior hearings. I put him on notice in regards to her dangerous propensities and let him
know that if he continues with this law suits and continues denying, what is clearly a public
record, he endangers me and my whole family. If something happens and Liberi is involved, he
will be held accountable as an accomplice.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 92 of 94
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 93 of 94
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 106-5 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 94 of 94
This entry was posted on Saturday, June 27th, 2009 at 3:52 pm and is filed under Events, Uncategorized. You
can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.