Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
, ABB Grid Systems, HVDC Power Transmission, October 26, 2011, Mexico City
Application Technology
Project examples Station tour of Rapid City Potential Baja Norte application Discussion
Asynchronous HVDC interconnections Back-to-back ties (or lines) across grid boundaries
Incremental interconnections between regions Controlled energy trade Shared reserves Increase diversity Improve reliability Enable mutual assistance and emergency support Isolate disturbances fire wall against cascading outages, alternative solution to too big to fail Application issues
HVDC Light
IGBT
Converter Phase reactors transformer + (+ transformer) series capacitor 22% in filters + 15-30% in filters <10% in filters 35% shunt +35% in series capacitors capacitors Smoothing Smoothing DC capacitor reactor + DC filt reactor + DC filt SCC > 2x SCC>1.3x Converter rating Converter rating Filter + cap bank switching Filter switch + series cap load Dead load or wind plant possible Continuous & dynamic
Improved stability for weak systems due to commutation capacitor Higher power for given location Simplified reactive power control Garabi: 4x550 MW Rapid City Tie: 2x100 MW Modular design for shorter construction time Least expensive, most efficient asynchronous tie technology for moderately weak system
For the same power and voltage rating, HVDC with VSC is generally a little more expensive than conventional HVDC for the same configuration For high power with strong grid, relative cost differential is higher For back-to-back with strong grid, the cost differential is higher For lower power levels and / or for relatively weak ac systems, the cost differential is less or may even reverse Some applications are only possible with VSC Full load losses for conventional HVDC are about 0.7% per converter whereas those for VSC HVDC are about 0.9% Additional system benefits provided by VSC, e.g. voltage support Continuous overload of 15-30% adds 5-10% to station cost for both technologies, no inherent low ambient overload with VSC More up-side foreseen with HVDC Light
Source: Variable Frequency Transformer A Simple and Reliable Transmission Technology, Paul Marken
Power flow
V2 /G2
What happens if there is a sudden bus voltage reduction on one side due to network event? What happens if there is sudden change in phase angle on one side due to contingency? What happens if there is a trip and reclosing attempt of radial ac lines? What is the impact of the high impedance on stability margin? What are the issues with wind plant interconnecting wind plant?
P
ABB Group November 2, 2011 | Slide 9
V1 V 2 X 12
sin
(G 1 G 2 )
Customers need
Enable Argentina (50 Hz) and Brazil (60 Hz) to utilize their electricity resources more efficiently and cost effectively
ABBs response
Customers benefits
The HVDC link enables competitive power providers to import and export power to take advantage of peaks and troughs in supply and demand between Brazils and Argentinas asynchronous networks
Customers need
Interconnect the power system of eastern USA with the western system with a 200 MW back-toback HVDC station at Rapid City, South Dakota
ABBs response
Customers benefits
The Rapid City DC tie will help to meet the increasing power demands in two asynchronous networks
Customers need
ABBs response
Customers benefits
Provides low-cost power to a growing market Strengthens the local grids on both sides of the US-Mexican border
Outaouais Canada
Customer: Hydro-Qubec Year of commissioning: 2009
Customers need
Raise transmission capacity between the two regions Qubec and Ontario
ABBs response
Customers benefits
Gives Ontario access to emission-free hydroelectric power from Quebec that replaces fossil fuel sources Improved grid reliability in both regions
Customers need
Regional power need close to two new hydropower plants in the northwest
ABBs response
Customers benefits
Highly efficient power transmission Decoupling of a large generation area from a small local network.
Rated power: 2x100 MW DC voltage: 13 kV Transmission: Back-to-Back System voltage: 230 kV In operation: 2003 Schedule: 19 months Reactive: 60 MVAr E-W asynchronous interconnection Weak system operation
Contented Neighbors
Happy Customers
TIJUANA 353MW
(3)
( PTECI ) ( PEEECo) SONOYTA PTO. PEASCO NOGALES AGUA PRIETA 64MW 21 SASABE ( 2 ) STA. CRUZ CANANEA (2) SANTA ANA 84MW 20MW NACOZARI 131MW P. E. CALLES 135MW
SN. QUINTIN
PIEDRAS NEGRAS 539MW RIO ESCONDIDO 1200MW CARBON II CUAUHTEMOC LAREDO 1400MW NAVA ( 2 ) (2) 124MW (CPL) FCO. VILLA (2) 399MW (2) AVALOS ( 2 ) NVA. ROSITA ( 2 ) ( 2 ) NVO. LAREDO PRESA FALCON HERCULES73MW CD. OBREGON (2) 149MW 234MW (2) CAMARGO HUITES (CPL) LAMPAZOS 422MW 183MW P. NUEVO ( 2 ) (2) FRONTERA (2) BROWNSVILLE ( 2 ) NAVOJOA MONCLOVA (2) FALCON (2) SANTIAGO 127MW (CPL) 208MW ( 2 ) 24MW 106MW (2) 31MW ESCOBEDO V. GARCIA EL FUERTE (2) (2) G. PALACIOANDALUCIA (2) 59MW 631MW (2) O.I. 230 KV (2) (2) MATAMOROS (2) 239MW BACURATO STO. LORETO REYNOSA (2) 196MW DOMINGO 5MW (2) (2) (2) 220MW RIO ( 2 ) LOS MOCHIS 92MW HUINALA BRAVO TOPOLOBAMPO 176MW LERDO (2) O.I. 230 KV SALTILLO MONTERREY 375MW 360MW 351MW PLAZA (2) 320MW VILLA 1775MW 918MW TORREON GUASAVE TEC CONSTITUCION (2) COMEDERO SUR 91MW NOLOGICO 5 56MW P. PRIETA II ( 2 ) 100MW (2) 9 112.5MW ( 2 ) HUMAYA DURANGO MONTE MORELOS 190MW II AGUSTIN LA PAZ 122 MWW CULIACAN 90MW OLACHEA 66MW CD. VICTORIA 285MW 65MWLA PAZ I (2) 101MW V. GUERRERO BLEDALES ( 2 ) (2) ALTAMIRA SANTIAGO MATEHUALA ( 2 ) 770MW 68MW EL HABAL OP.INC.230 KV MAZATLAN ZACATECAS TAMPICO 165MW RIO VERDE 281MW 402MW SAN JOSE 616MW 41MW DEL CABO CABO SAN LUCAS CD. VALLES 110MW 46MW SN. L. POTOSI (2) (2) 457MW 2.2 700MW AGUAMILPA AGUASCALIENTES 406MW 960MW (2) (2) ( 2 ) TEPIC 3.1 ( 2 ) LEON TUXPAN 113MW 326MW QUERETARO A. PRIETA 2100MW GUADALAJARA ( 3 ) ( 2 ) 422MW (2) 240MW POZA RICA EL SAUZ 424MW ( 2 ) 1328MW (2) IRAPUATOCELAYA 218MW 292MW (2) 127MW (2) 289MW 288MW 117MW 2.1 (2) (2) (2) 109MW (3) ( 2 ) ZIMAPAN S. BERNABE (2) PTO.VALLARTA ( 2QRO.POT ) MAZATEPEC DAU 87MW SALAMANCA TEZIUTLAN 189MW 866MW (2) 96MW MORELIA JALAPA 2.3 MAZAMITLA CARAPAN 170MW 86MW ( 2TLAXCALA ) CD. GUZMAN 213MW 226MW (2) 88MW AZUFRES PUEBLA (2) APATZINGAN 459MW 98MW MANZANILLO (3) 75MW 155MW D. GUERRACUERNAVACA 1900MW 338MW 1 84MW ( 2 ) (2) 6 HERMOSILLO 543MW (2) GUAYMAS 554MW 94MW (2) CHIHUAHUA 266MW
Location
Back-to-back or line Rating Relative system strength Expandability Integration of wind resources System restoration Technology Economics, O&M