Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Overview
Sixth JO Survey in a series started in 1999
1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2013
Conducted online via www.surveymonkey.com 46 questions, ~45 minutes per survey to complete
2300 completed surveys (33% of total JOs)
Survey Responders
12.6% 31.0% 30.1% 26.3%
ENS LTJG LT 15.5% 33.8% 22.9% 27.8% LCDR
White Diverse
Diversity
102 24 12
49 144 120
78%
22%
Accession Source
3.6% 9.3% 26.7% 25.8% 33.0% 1.6%
USNA
Agenda
Surface Warfare Enterprise
2013 vs. Previous Survey Comparison 2013 Key Findings SWE Actions Since 2008
Professional Satisfiers/Dissatisfiers
Surface Warfare Enterprise
Satisfiers
2013 Relationships with subordinates Leadership challenge Relationship with peers Mental Challenges Conning the ship Variety of duties and responsibilities Relationship with Senior Enlisted 2008 Leading/training subordinates Mental challenge Relationship with peers / Senior Enlisted Shiphandling opportunities Variety of duties / responsibilities
Dissatisfiers
2013 Inability to plan family/personal life Too many inspections Work hours Inability to plan work Lack of time to qualify In port watches 2008 Inability to plan family/personal life Work hours Inability to plan professionally Lack of recognition for work Too many inspections Zero defect mentality Collateral duties
4
Pros
2013 Job security Retirement benefits Medical benefits Opportunities for new experiences Service to the country Pay, allowances, and benefits Adventure and travel 2008 Retirement benefits Service to the country Job security Professionally rewarding responsibilities Pride in the Navy
Cons
2013 Work load Strain on family (separation) Micromanagement Inability to start/grow a family Quality of leadership Lack of incentive for outperforming peers Zero defects mentality
5
2008 Work load Strain on family (separation) Quality of leadership Civilian employment opportunity
26. Indicate the degree of satisfaction you find in the following aspects of your sea duty assignment(s):
Sense the work I am doing is valuable
(5= very satisfied, 1= very dissatisfied)
5.00
4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 ALL 54% ENS 28.6% LTJG LT LCDR
5.00
4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 ALL 55.4% ENS 28.7% LTJG LT LCDR
5.00
4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 ALL 60.9% ENS 13.8% LTJG LT LCDR
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Retention Issues
Surface Warfare Enterprise
Responders more likely to stay Navy than stay SWO Female officers less likely to pursue CO, remain SWO, or remain Navy
Be a CO afloat. Make the Navy a career.
5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 ALL ENS LTJG LT LCDR Male Female
5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 ALL ENS LTJG LT LCDR Male Female
5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 ALL ENS LTJG LT LCDR Male Female
Leave the active duty Navy upon completion of my present obligation or at the end of current tour of duty.
ALL
ENS
LTJG
LT
LCDR
Male Female
DIVO
DH
ALL
ENS
LTJG
LT
LCDR
Male
Female
5.00
4.50
4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00
1 2 3 4 5
Micromanagement by superiors
The strain on my family life Balancing the Navys needs My ability to start a family and/or family separation with spouses needs or grow a family
All
Married
Dependents
Male
Female
08 survey revealed nearly 75% of responders felt DIVO training was inadequate
5.00 4.50
600
Number of responses
All
ENS
LTJG
LT
LCDR
1
1 2 3 4 5
23. How satisfied are you with the current SWO qualification process, understanding that it now includes the Basic Division Officer Course (BDOC), PQS, watch station qualification boards, and a final SWO Board conducted by the ship's CO within the prescribed 24-month timeline?
10
Averages
Response
20. On a scale of 1 to 5, please indicate to what extent you believe your commissioning source prepared you to serve as an underway Officer of the Deck.
Morale
Surface Warfare Enterprise Morale viewed Fleet-wide as low, but individual officers report more satisfaction with their sea duty assignments
Free text includes frequent reference to lack of common SWO qualification standards, inconsistency in SWO boards and requisite knowledge Time-management is a significant factor
27. How would you describe the current morale of the Surface Fleet? (Very High = 5, Very Low = 1)
5.00
25. How satisfied were you with your most recent sea duty assignment? (Very satisfied = 5, Very dissatisfied = 1)
5.00
4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00
4.50
4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50
1.00
11
(30/18)
24/24
1.50
1.00
I like the current 30 month 1st I would like a single longer If a single longer tour for most I would like two tours, with I would like 1st tour 24 tour 18 month 2nd tour tour for most (36 mo) with a (36 mo) with a 2nd tour for the 1st tour shorter than the months, 2nd tour 24 months, construct. 2nd tour for some (approx some (approx 40%) was 2nd tour. with DIVO billet re-alignment 40%). implemented I would desire a to support. 2nd tour.
12
5.00 4.50
4.00
3.50 Male 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00
Division Officers Department Executive Commanding (Ensigns and Heads Officers Officers Lieutenants (Lieutenants (Lieutenant (Commanders) Junior Grade) and Lieutenant Commanders / Commanders) Commanders) Commanding Officers (Captains)
Female
ALL
EO and Fraternization
Surface Warfare Enterprise
Equal Opportunity
Sexual Harassment and Equal Opportunity training judged adequate (Above 4.0 in 5.0 scale for all ranks/gender) Perception of equal treatment for all ethnicities is positive (About 3.5 in 5.0 scale for all ranks/gender)
Fraternization
Responders (particularly female) report greater impression that female officers are susceptible to fraternization, rather than actually being susceptible
5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50
3.00
2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00
Male
Female
ALL
Female JO's are more Female JO's are more susceptible to fraternization susceptible to the perception with their Sailors than their of fraternization with their male counterparts Sailors more so than their male counterparts
14
Information Sources:
Facebook is by far the most visited site recorded in the survey NPC website surpasses popular SWO blogs as a resource
39. Please indicate which, if any, of these social media or information sources you frequent. (Select all that apply.) 1 = Never, 5 = Multiple times/day
5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00
1.50
1.00
70.0% 60.0%
50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0%
Department Head
Peers
Detailer
Spouse
Mentor
Social Media
All
Male
Female
ENS
LTJG
LT
LCDR
Rotational Crewing
Surface Warfare Enterprise 14.9% of responders reported having experience in rotational crewing Significantly higher impression 44. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with each of concerning rotational crewing. Select only of rotational crewing among the following statements one option for each row. 5 = strongly agree, 1 = strongly disagree responders with experience 5.00 in rotational crews (with noted 4.50 4.00 exception of OPTEMPO) 3.50 3.00 Survey result likely 2.50 influenced by platform for 2.00 rotational crewing (PC/MCM 1.50 1.00 Rotational crewing Rotational crewing Rotational crews will vice DD/DDG) will help OPTEMPO. provides a method to maintain a high
ALL
17
get more capability standard of material forward. readiness on deployed hulls. Have Rotationally Crewed
XO/CO Fleet-up
Surface Warfare Enterprise 68.7% of responders reported having experience in an XO/CO fleet-up ship
45. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with each of the following statements concerning XO/CO Fleet-up. 5 = strongly agree, 1 = strongly disagree
5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00
18
XO/CO fleet- The crew The Chiefs The XO/CO fleet- Fleet-up is a Fleet-up is a up improves likes fleet-up. mess likes Wardroom up will better positive positive readiness by fleet-up. likes fleet-up. prepare me factor in my factor in my providing for command career family continuity of planning planning leadership. ALL Served in XO/CO Fleet-up Ship
Revisit JO tour lengths and billet base Develop / refine training pipelines Reduce micromanagement at all levels Reduce the workload Reduce the impact of inspections and assist visits Improve readiness reporting
19
SWO Clock
Reduce time away from waterfront for leadership Support implementation of SFRM Pay ourselves first
20