Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
NG0H203
Lecturer: Mrs Rhian Kerton Name: Adrian Secan Enrolment Number: 12032239
I-i
I. Summary
For this report I have done 3 measurements. As a result of this report I can say that first and second readings are valid for calibration of the differential pressure transducer because of the low linearity error and FSR. The third measurement has a lot of errors thats why the linearity error and FSR are Big.
Table of contents
Table of Contents
1. 2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 Background ........................................................................................................................2 2.11 2.12 3. 4. Static calibration .........................................................................................................2 Differential Pressure Transducer ................................................................................2
Experimental Procedure and Equipment ..........................................................................3 Results ................................................................................................................................4 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 Reading 1 ....................................................................................................................4 Reading 2 ....................................................................................................................6 Reading 3 ....................................................................................................................7 Discussion of the results .............................................................................................8
5. 6.
ii
1.
Introduction
A pressure transducer measures pressure, typically of gases or liquids. The expression of the force required to stop a fluid from expanding is named pressure. Pressure transducers can be called: pressure sensors, pressure transmitters, pressure senders, pressure indicators and piezometers, manometers, among other names. The laboratory experiment was done to calibrate a differential pressure transducer. The purpose of the experiment was finding: What is the input and output range in the calibration exercise. Determinate the equation of best-fit line. Determinate the static sensitivity ( K ).
Experimental Methods
2.
Background
For this experiment basic knowledge about: static calibration and Differential Pressure Transducer are required. In the following subsections are presented some information about these topics.
2.11
Static calibration
The most common type of calibration is known as a static calibration. In this procedure, a known value is input to the system under calibration and the system output is recorded. The term "static" refers to a calibration procedure in which the values of the variables involved remain constant during a measurement and they do not change with time. In static calibrations, only the magnitudes of the known input and the measured output are important.
2.12
The Differential Pressure Transducer consist of two pressure inlets P1 and P2 which act on a metal diaphragm placed centrally between the two coils. If the pressures are equal there is no movement of the diaphragm and the inductance in the two coils is the same. If there is any difference between the two pressures, the diaphragm will be deflected to one side, thus resulting in differences in the inductance of the two coils. The difference in inductance of the coils is directly proportional to the pressure difference.
Experimental Methods
3.
The differential pressure transducer was calibrated from 0 to 6 in steps of 0.4 bars. The pressure readings on hydraulic ram display and also the corresponding voltage readings from the digital voltmeter were recorded. For this experiment are needed one differential pressure transducer, one pressure ram and a digital voltmeter. One of the inlet ports of the transducer is connected to the pressure ram which is used to exert pressure in the transducer; the other one is exposed to the atmosphere. The pressure is increased in steps of 0.4 bars by sliding the ram position pointer upward. As the pressure is increase the diaphragm of the transducer is deflected toward one side of the inductive coils. The resultant difference in inductance of the coils is measured by a signal conditioning unit which output DC voltage proportional to the gauge pressure of the hydraulic ram. All the data is recorded and after the calculation the calibration can be done.
Experimental Methods
4.
Results
is:
Three readings were done for this experiment and the data collected is shown below in the section 4.11, 4.12 and 4. 13.
4.11 Reading 1
Pressure Voltage 0 0.005 0.4 0.507 1.2 1.559 1.6 2.099 2 2.604 2.4 3.121 2.8 3.651 3.2 4.171 3.6 4.687 4 5.158 4.4 5.758 4.8 6.248 5.2 6.812 5.6 7.305 6 7.63 Input range = 6 Output range = 7. 625 El max = 0. 1493 FSR = 1.96 %
Best fit 0.0165 0.53402 1.56906 2.08658 2.6041 3.12162 3.63914 4.15666 4.67418 5.1917 5.70922 6.22674 6.74426 7.26178 7.7793
Linearity error 0.0115 0.02702 0.01006 -0.01242 0.0001 0.00062 -0.01186 -0.01434 -0.01282 0.0337 -0.04878 -0.02126 -0.06774 -0.04322 0.1493
Experimental Methods
Reading 1
9 8 7 6 Voltage 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 7.63 7.305 6.812 6.248 5.758 5.158 4.687 4.171 3.651 3.121 2.604 2.099 1.559 0.507 0.005 2 4 Pressure (Bar) 6 8 y = 1.2938x + 0.0165 R = 0.9996
x 1 3
1.29
Experimental Methods
4.12
Pressure
Reading 2
Voltage Best fit 0.009 0.53096 1.57488 2.09684 2.6188 3.14076 3.66272 4.18468 4.70664 5.2286 5.75056 6.27252 6.79448 7.31644 7.8384 Linearity error 0.003 0.05896 -0.00212 -0.00716 0.0088 0.04276 0.02272 0.03068 0.01264 0.0066 -0.00144 0.04852 0.03048 -0.01656 0.0324
0 0.006 0.4 0.472 1.2 1.577 1.6 2.104 2 2.61 2.4 3.098 2.8 3.64 3.2 4.154 3.6 4.694 4 5.222 4.4 5.752 4.8 6.224 5.2 6.764 5.6 7.333 6 7.806 Input range = 6 Output range = 7. 8 El max = 0.05896 FSR = 0.76 %
Reading 2
9 8 7.806 7.333 7 6.764 6.224 6 5.752 5.222 5 4.694 4.154 4 3.64 3.098 3 2.61 2.104 2 1.577 1 0.472 0 0.006 2 4 6 -1 0 Pressure (Bar) y = 1.3049x - 0.009 R = 0.9999
Voltage
Experimental Methods
x 1 3
4.13
Reading 3
Pressure Voltage Best Linearity fit error 0 0.029 0.4009 0.3719 0.4 0.515 0.941 0.426 1.2 1.023 2.0211 0.9981 1.6 1.605 2.5612 0.9562 2 2.108 3.1013 0.9933 2.4 2.581 3.6414 1.0604 2.8 3.111 4.1815 1.0705 3.2 3.644 4.7215 1.0775 3.6 4.169 5.2616 1.0926 4 5.134 5.8017 0.6677 4.4 5.737 6.3418 0.6048 4.8 6.268 6.8819 0.6139 5.2 6.821 7.4219 0.6009 5.6 7.149 7.962 0.813 6 7.822 8.5021 0.6801 Input range = 6 Output range = 7. 793 El max = 1.0926 FSR = 14.02 %
Experimental Methods
Reading 3
9 7.822 7.149 6.821 6.268 6 5.737 5.134 5 4.169 4 3.644 3.111 3 2.581 2.108 2 1.605 1 1.023 0.515 0 0.029 0 2 4 6 -1 Pressure (Bar) 7 8 y = 1.3502x - 0.4009 R = 0.9904
Voltage
x 1 3
Experimental Methods
Calibration of a Differential Pressure Transducer The best measurement for calibration is the second one because the linearity error is the lowest one and it is 0.05896 in the first measurement the linearity error is almost triple then the second one and it is 0.1493 and in the third measurement is a big increase of the linearity error and this is 1.0926, almost 20 times bigger than the second one. The static sensitivity is 1.29 for the first measurement, 1.30 for the second one and 1.35 for the third one.
5.
Conclusion
In conclusion 3 sets of measurement were done with the purpose of calibrating a differential pressure transducer. The summary of data collected from the 3 measurements: Reading 1 Input range = 6 Output range = 7. 625 El (linearity error) max = 0. 1493 FSR ( Full Scale Reading ) = 1.96 % Static Sensitivity (gradient of line) = 1.29 Reading 2 Input range = 6 Output range = 7. 8 El max = 0.05896 FSR = 0.76 % Static Sensitivity=1.30 Reading 3 Input range = 6 Output range = 7. 793 El max = 1.0926 FSR = 14.02 % Static Sensitivity=1.35 After I analysed this data I can say that the best measurement to be consider for calibration is the second one because of its low linearity error and FSR. The third reading can be disregarded because the linearity error and FSR are too high to be considered. The first reading can be considered too because it is similar with the second one.
Adrian Secan 12032239
9
Experimental Methods
6.
Reference
Background and Theory: Web sites: Accessed on 13th of January 2013 : http://rsi.aip.org/resource/1/rsinak/v75/i12/p5106_s1?isAuthorized=no http://www.iceweb.com.au/Test&Calibration/NoteDeviceCalibration.pdf Books:
Article I. Bibliography
D.G.Whitehead, B.R.B.a., 1986. Transducer and interfacing. Wokingam, England. Korvink, J., Paul, O., Korvink, J. & Paul, O., December 31, 2006. MEMS a practical guide to design, analysis and application. M.J.Usher, 1985. Sensors and Transducers. Hong Kong. Sydenham, P.H., 1975. Transducers in measurement and control. 3rd ed.
10
Experimental Methods
11
Experimental Methods