Sie sind auf Seite 1von 116

Centrifugal

Compressors

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Topics

‹ Centrifugal Compressor Model


‹ How a Centrifugal works / Energy Conversion
‹ Centrifugal Flowpaths
‹ Performance Curves
‹ Operation Limits: Surge & Overload
‹ Factors Affecting Compressor Performance
‹ Operational Issues – Optimizing Compressor
Efficiency
© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Axially or Horizontally Split Compressor

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Radially or Vertically Split Compressor

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Radially Split with Shear Ring Heads

Shear
Ring

O-Rings

Retaining
Ring

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Shear Rings & O-Rings

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
The Centrifugal Effect
Centripetal
Force
Momentum
Velocity &
Direction

Centrifugal
Reaction

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Gas Velocity Increase
V3

V2

V1

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Gas Impeller Exit Angle
Exit Path at
Rated Flow
Low Flow Exit Path
Exit Path Due to
Backward Curve
Tangent
Exit Path

•© 2004
© 2006
by Dresser-Rand
Centrifugal Action
Cover Blades Disk

TIP OF THE
IMPELLER
High Velocity,
Higher Pressure
Gas Outlet

EYE OF THE
IMPELLER
Low Velocity,
Low Pressure
Gas Inlet

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Impellers

Manufacturing
• Cast
• Riveted Types
• Welded • Open
Two Piece • Semi-Enclosed
Three Piece • Enclosed

Cover Blades Disk

Hub

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Polygon Fit Impeller Rotor Assembly

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Centrifugal Action Diffusion Passage

Diffusion
Diffusion Passage
Passage
P2 P2

P1 P1
Shaft

Impeller Impeller

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Diffusion Passage Cross-Sectional Area

Diffusion Diffusion
Passage Passage

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Diffusion Passage Velocity Changes
V1 Diffusion
Diffusion Passage
Passage
V2 V2
V1

V1 V1
Shaft

Impeller Impeller

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Pressure, Volume and Temperature

1 ft.

Gas = 1 ft.3

1 ft.
1 ft.

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Temperature and Molecule Energy
Level

Greater Temperature =
Greater Energy =
Higher Pressure

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Pressure, Volume and Temperature

1 ft.

Gas = 1 ft.3

1 ft.
1 ft.
Add Heat
© 2006 Dresser-Rand
What is a Stage of Compression?
Centrifugal Stage

Return Bend

Return Bend
Diffuser
Reduces Velocity
Increases Static Pressure

Return Channel
Impeller
Increases Velocity
Increases Static Pressure
Guide Vanes

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Centrifugal Compressor Stage

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Energy Conversion

P4,V4,T4
P5,V1,T5
P3,V1,T3

P5,V1,T5
P2,V4,T2

P1,V1,T1

P3,V1,T3

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Centrifugal Flowpaths

P3 P5 P7 P9

Balance
Piston
P1

Straight Thru or Series Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Centrifugal Flowpaths
SS In SS Out

P5 P7
P3 P9

Balance
Piston
P1

Series Flow with Sidestreams

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Centrifugal Flowpaths

P3 P7 P9

P5 Balance
Piston
P1

Compound Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Centrifugal Flowpaths

P3 P5 P3

P1 P1

Parallel or Double Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Centrifugal Flowpaths

P5 P9

D Wall
P1 P5

D Wall

Back to Back Flow with No Cooler

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Back-to-Back Flow without a Cooler

Second Section
First Section Discharge
Suction

Second Section
Division Wall Inlet

Cross-
First Section Over
Discharge

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Centrifugal Flowpaths

P5 P9

D Wall
P1 P5

D Wall

Back to Back Flow with a Cooler

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Bridgeovers
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Bridgeovers

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Bridgeovers

Bridgeover

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Inlet Guides

Fit to
Diaphragm

Interstage Labyrinth
Seal Grooves

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Diaphragm
Return
Bend

Diffusion
Passage

Return
Passage

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Inlet Guide In Diaphragm

Outside Diameter
of Impeller

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Interstage Seals
Impeller

Function
P3 P5

Diffuser

Diaphragm P4
Shaft P2 Diaphragm

Interstage Labyrinth
Laby Seals Seal Labyrinth
Seal
Labyrinth
Location Labyrinth P1
Seal
P3
Seal
Shaft Impeller Shaft Impeller
Spacer Spacer

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Labyrinth Seals
Seal

Turbulence
- Low Flow

Seal
Shaft

Low High
Pressure Pressure

Seal with Shaft


Worn Teeth
Low High
Pressure Pressure

Shaft Wet Gas


Laminar - Condensate
Low High High Flow Deposits
Pressure Pressure

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Hole Pattern Division Wall Seal with
Swirl Brake

This design makes the seal insentive to preswirl even if the shunt is lost,
which can occur during overload operation

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Performance Curves
and
Surge Control

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Performance Curves

‹ Head Concept
‹ Basic Components
‹ Fixed/Variable Speed
‹ Surge/Overload
‹ Effects on Performance

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Head Concept
‹ Mechanical: The “work” (energy) developed to raise a
weight of 1 pound by a distance of one (1) foot. Expressed
in foot-pound (or equivalent Kgm or Nm);
‹Gas Compressors: “ work” done by the compressor /
amount of gas. The head expressed in feet, is the height to
which the gas could be lifted

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Head Concept
‹ The height to which the gas is lifted depends on the velocity
of the gas
‹ For any given RPM, the head developed by the compressor
is fairly constant, independent of the gas nature.
‹ Head is depending upon:
• Compressor geometry (i.e. no of stages, impeller diameters)
• Compressor speed
Z: Compressibility Factor
R: Gas Constant = 1545 / MW
Ts: Suction Temperature (°R)

M: r: Pressure Ratio (Pd / Ps)


M: Polytrophic Exponent

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Head Concept – Example

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Compressor Performance Curves illustrates the
operating range and flexibility of a given compressor

120%

Surge
% Head, Pressure, Pressure Ratio

110% Region
Design
Point
100%
105%
100%
90% 95%
90%
85%
80% Speed
Lines

70%
Overload
Region
60%

60% 80% 90% 100% 120%


% Inlet Capacity or Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Compressor Performance Curves
‹There are two types of curves that are generally required,
section and overall:
• section refers to an impeller or sequence of impellers between two
nozzles such that there is no pressure drop or temp reduction
between impellers
• overall refers to a complete compressor or compressor train
Note: a back-to-back unit with a crossover may often be considered a
two-section compressor; but with respect to performance curves, it is a
single section since no pressure drop or cooling is introduced between
the impellers

‹For single section compressors, the section curves and


overall curves are one in the same

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Design Point is the point at which usual operation is
expected and optimum efficiency is . It is the point at which
the vendor certifies that performance is within the tolerance
120%
% Head, Pressure, Pressure Ratio

110%
Design
Point
100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

60% 80% 90% 100% 120%


% Inlet Capacity or Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Rated Point is intersection on the 100 % speed line
corresponding to the highest flow of any operating point

120%
% Head, Pressure, Pressure Ratio

110%
Rated
Point
100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

60% 80% 90% 100% 120%


% Inlet Capacity or Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Stability: the percent of change in capacity between the rated (design
point) capacity and surge (limit) point, all at constant speed, is measured as
the stability of the centrifugal compressor. Indicates the capability of the
centrifugal compressor to operate at less than design flow
120%
% Head, Pressure, Pressure Ratio

110%
Design
Point
100%

% Stability
90%

80%

70%

60%

60% 80% 90% 100% 120%


% Inlet Capacity or Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Turndown: the percent of change in capacity between the rated
(Design point) capacity and the surge (limit) point, all at constant head or
pressure is measured as turndown of the centrifugal compressor. Indicates
the capability of the centrifugal compressor to operate at less than design
flow 120%
% Head, Pressure, Pressure Ratio

110%
Design
Point
100%

90%

80% % Turndown

70%

60%

60% 80% 90% 100% 120%


% Inlet Capacity or Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Rise to Surge: the percent of change in discharge pressure between
the rated point and surge limit at constant speed. High RTS means the
compressor can accommodate a modest increase in discharge pressure
with a little change in flow
120%
% Head, Pressure, Pressure Ratio

110%
Design
% RTS Point
100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

60% 80% 90% 100% 120%


% Inlet Capacity or Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge Phenomenon
‹ At any given speed, there is minimum flow, below which, the
compressor cannot be operated in a stable condition. This
minimum flow value is called “surge “ point.
‹ Surge is oscillation of the entire flow of the compressor
system and this oscillation can be detrimental to the machine.
‹ Compressor surge may be evidenced by the following:
a) Excessive rotor vibration
b) Increasingly higher process gas temp
c) Rapid changes in axial thrust
d) Sudden changes in load
e) Audible sounds (if surge is severe)

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge Description Resistance to Flow Causes
Pressure to Rise Which
Causes Flow to Decrease
Sudden Reversal of Flow
Slams Thrust Disc Against
120% Inactive Thrust Bearing
% Head, Pressure, Pressure Ratio

Surge
110%
Region
Design
Point
100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

60% 80% 90% 100% 120%


% Inlet Capacity or Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge Description Resistance to Flow Causes
Pressure to Rise Which
Causes Flow to Decrease
Sudden Reversal of Flow
Slams Thrust Disc Against
120% Inactive Thrust Bearing
% Head, Pressure, Pressure Ratio

Surge
110%
Region
Design
Point Pressure Builds along the
100%
Design Curve Back
to the Design Point
90%

80%
Pressure Ratio Drops Low Enough
70% for Flow to Instantaneously
Build Back to the Design Curve
60%

60% 80% 90% 100% 120%


% Inlet Capacity or Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge Control System
Input Signals Required
1 - Suction Flow
2 - Suction Pressure
3 - Discharge Pressure
Suction 2
Flow Element
Flow 1 Pressure PT Pressure PT
Transmitter FT Transmitter Transmitter Discharge
3

Recycle PC
SP
G D A AC G E
B I I OO B T
Valve U C MCH

Surge Control
I/P In the PLC

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge Control on Performance Curves
Operating Point Control Line
Surge Line
120%

110%

100%
Pressure Ratio

90%

80%

70%

60%

60% 80% 90% 100% 120%


Suction Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge Control System
Input Signals Required
1 - Suction Flow
2 - Suction Pressure
3 - Discharge Pressure
Suction 2
Flow Element
Flow 1 Pressure PT Pressure PT
Transmitter FT Transmitter Transmitter Discharge
3

Recycle PC
SP
G D A AC G E
B I I OO B T
Valve U C MCH

Surge Control
I/P In the PLC

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge Control on Performance Curves
Operating Point Control Line
Surge Line Backup Line
120%

110%

100%
Pressure Ratio

90%

80%

70%

60%

60% 80% 90% 100% 120%


Suction Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge Control

Surge Controller Performance


Map

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Suction
Flow Element
PT
PT
FT Discharge
To Vent

Blow Off PC
SP
G D A AC G E
B I I OO B T
Valve U C MCH

Surge Control
I/P In the PLC

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Cooler
Suction
Flow Element
Flow Pressure PT Pressure PT
Transmitter
FT
Transmitter Transmitter Discharge

Recycle PC
SP
G D A AC G E
B I I OO B T
Valve U C MCH

Surge Control
I/P In the PLC

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge – Damage of Compressor Internals
High axial displacement

Deformation due to high


temperature

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge
‹The frequency of the surge cycle varies inversely with the
volume of the system
‹ If the check valve is located near compressor discharge
nozzle, the frequency will be much higher than of a system
with a large volume in the discharge upstream of the check
valve
‹ The higher frequency of the surge, the intensity will be
lower (i.e. few cycles / minute up to more than 20 cycles /
sec)
‹ The intensity of the surge increases with gas density ,
pressure and lower temperature

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge - Effects of Gas Composition
Best Efficiency point

E%
Heavy Gas (propane, propylene)
Medium Gas (air, nitrogen, natural gas)
Light Gas (Hydrogen reach gases, i.e.
hydrocarbon processing plants)

Surge points

Q
© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Surge - Effects of Gas Composition

Observations made in respect to the heavy


gas:
‹ The flow at surge is higher;
‹ The stage produces more head than
corresponding to medium gas / light gas
‹ The right side of the curve turns downward
(approaches stonewall) more rapidly
‹The curve is flatter in the opening stage (small
RTS)

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
External Causes and Effects of Surge

‹ Restriction in suction or discharge of system


‹ Process changes in pressure, temperatures, or gas MW
‹ Internal plugging of flow passages of compressor (fouling)
‹ Inadvertent loss of speed
‹ Instrument or control valve malfunction
‹ Operator error
‹ Misdistribution of load in parallel operation
‹ Improper assembly of compressor (impeller overlap)

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Restriction in Suction / Discharge

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Parallel Operation
‹ Typically, for parallel operation, the flow is not split evenly and one
section or compressor handles more flow than the other, but both
sections are required to make the same pressure ratio
‹ Careful analysis of the pressure ratio curves is required to insure
satisfactory operation and suitable overall range

“similar pressure ratio curves”


• At the design flow, section (1) is
much more flow than of section (2)
• If the total flow is reduced 10%,
the compressor slows down to
maintain the same pressure ratio
• The flow to each section is
reduced 10% (dashed line) since
the pressure ratio curves have a
approximately the same rise

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
“different pressure ratio curves” (section 2 pressure ratio curve is
steeper than section 1)
• If the total flow is reduced 10% the compressor slows down to maintain
pressure ratio
• Section (1) reduces more than 10% ( about 12.5% - the dashed line)
since its curve is shallower
• Section (2) reduces less than 10% (about 5% - dashed line) since its
curve is steeper
• The two sections are now
operating at significantly different
portions of the curve and are now
handling a different percentage of
the total flow than they were at the
design point.
• Section (1) is nearing surge.
Further reduction in flow would
force section one into surge
• The difference in the curve
shape results in a reduced overall
range for parallel operation
© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Impeller Overlap with Diffuser

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Impeller Overlap with Diffuser

Positive overlap Nominal Non Desirable


Limited Desired Limited

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Impeller Overlap with Diffuser

‹ It is preferable that no impeller shall have negative overlap


‹ The negative overlap is limited to 5% of the impeller tip

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Overload

120%

Surge
% Head, Pressure, Pressure Ratio

110% Region
Design
Point
100%
105%
100%
90% 95%
90%
85%
80% Speed
Lines

70%
Overload
Region
60%

60% 80% 90% 100% 120%


% Inlet Capacity or Flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Choke Limit
‹ Choke is the maximum flow that a centrifugal compressor
can handle at a given speed. At that point, the compressor is
unable to produce any net overall pressure ratio.
‹ The maximum flow region of the compressor performance
curve is where the gas speeds approach Mach 1
‹ Gas compression is no longer occurring in the compression
channels. This region of the curve, as it becomes almost
vertical at the choke limit, is also know as “Stonewall”
‹ Stonewall is usually not detrimental to the compressor, it
simply limits the maximum flow. If choke occurs at an off
design condition, the maximum volume flow can be increased
by increasing the rotational speed

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Performance Curves – Inlet Gas
Condition Effects

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Performance Curves – Inlet Gas
Condition Effects

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Factors Affecting Compressor
Performance
‹ MW & Head - If MW increases, the head for a given ratio will decrease
in direct proportion
‹ Temp & Head - If the Ts increases, the head for a given ratio will
increase in direct proportion
‹ Zave & Head - If the average compressibility increases, the head will
increase in direct proportion
‹ N and Head - If speed increases, the head will increase in direct
proportion
‹ BHP and Head - If Head increases, the BHP will increase in direct
proportion
‹ Flow and Speed - If the speed increases, the flow will increase in direct
proportion

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Factors Affecting Compressor
Performance
‹ N & BHP - If the speed increases, the BHP will increase in
proportion to the cube of the speed. (Because flow increases
directly as speed and head increases as the square of the
speed and BHP is the product of head X mass flow)
‹ Density - The only thing a compressor impeller sees is inlet
capacity. Thus to get more capacity out of an existing
compressor it is necessary to change the density of the inlet
by:
• decreasing the suction temperature
• increasing the suction pressure
• increasing the MW of the gas

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Compressor Off - Design Performance
‹ Performance curves for axial and centrifugal
compressors are usually based on constant inlet
conditions (Ps, Ts, MW). In actual service, these
compressors rarely see these base curve conditions
exactly
‹ If the field inlet conditions deviate more then 5% from
the curve inlet conditions then the field data can not be
accurately plotted on the curve without converting the field
data to curve conditions
‹ To properly evaluate the compressor (running off
design), the performance parameters shall be corrected to
the design conditions

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Allowable Variance for Inlet TZ / MW for
Acceptable Head Curve Accuracy

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Operation Limitations

Compressor

Driver

Power

Process

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Compressor Operation Issues-
Efficiency Drop

‹ Internal recycle
‹ Un-tuned Surge Control System
‹ Leakage via by-pass valve(s) in process
‹ Compressor operated out of “guaranteed
performance envelope”
‹ Impeller & Diaphragm erosion
‹ Fouling

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Internal Recycle – Gap at the
diaphragm / guides splits

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Internal Recycle – Gap at the
diaphragm / guides splits

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Labyrinth Leakage
Leakage proportional to:
• ∆P
• Clearance
• Diameter
•1 / (No.Laby Teeth)0.5

Eye laby leakage is


approx. 10 times
spacer laby leakage

Eye Laby
Leakage
Spacer Laby
Leakage
© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Internal Recycle – Labyrinth Clearance

Process labyrinths can


be plugged by wet
particles in the gas flow

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Internal Recycle – Labyrinth Clearance
Shaft Spacer

Impeller Cover

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Internal Recycle – Labyrinth Clearance

Impeller Cover

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
PEEK Labyrinth

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
PEEK Physical Properties
GRADE COEF. TENSILE ELONGATION SPECIFIC
THERMAL STRENGTH (%) GRAVITY
EXPNSION (PSI)
(F)
Arlon CP 17 x 10 /-6 11,080 2.0 1.45
Torlon 18.8 12,900 6.6 1.44
4340
Fluorosint 19.4 1,100 10.0 2.32
500

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Un- tuned Surge Control System

‹ Recycle valve shall be calibrated at every planned S/D


• fast opening ( < 1 sec)
• total travel 0-100 %; 4 – 20 mA
• mechanical stop to coincide with 100 % close
‹ Valve positioner shall match the command
‹ FT instrument shall be calibrated at every planned S/D
‹ Flow calculation block – correct constants, correct range

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fouling
‹… is the deposit and the non –uniform accumulation of
debris in the gas
‹ Occurs due to carry over of liquids and debris from the
inlet suction scrubber
‹ Polymerization may occur in wet gas and cracked gas
compressors applications if the temperature exceeds the
critical point beyond the polymerization process occurs
(235 F)
‹ Fouling build up occurs usually on the impeller hub and
shroud. There is also a build up on the blades ( on the
pressure side)

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fouling

IGV partially clogged 1st stage impeller – hard deposits

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fouling Effects – Charge Gas

3M7 – Eroded Sleeves


© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fouling Effects

April 25 '99 NPC Thai Fouling 9

Abrasive Scoring due to Fouling


© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fouling Effects – Charge Gas

3M7 - Deterioration of stage clearances


© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fouling Deposit Characterization
‹ Scientifically characterization of the fouling deposits can
provide clear information about the actual cause(s) of the
problem(s) . Key deposit characterization includes:

1) Elemental Analysis - Chemical Composition (C, H, O, N, S)


2) Electron Microscopy Morphology – Microstructure composition
analysis components (asphaltene, oil, coke, and inorganic)
3) TGA (thermo gravimetric analyzer) - Thermal fractionation into
components
4) EDS (x-ray) Electron Dispersive Spectroscopy - Inorganic elements
5) X-RAY Diffraction - Inorganic compounds

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Techniques to Prevent Fouling

‹Condition monitoring, both aerodynamic and


mechanical parameters
‹ Process control
‹ Online solvent injection
‹ Coatings of Impellers and Diaphragms

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fouling - Condition Monitoring
(aerodynamic and mechanical parameters)

‹ Monitor and trend the information regarding


process conditions
• MW
• Pressure
• Temperature

‹ Vibration monitoring
• On line system
• Off line system

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Condition Monitoring

‹Calculate and trend the compressor polytrophic


efficiency using the reference point (i.e. after
overhaul, revamp)

k − 1 log(Pd Ps )
ηp = ⋅
k log(Td Ts )
K – isentropic coefficient;
Cp , Cv – specific heat at constant pressure / volume

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Condition Monitoring – DR RECON
Online System

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fouling - Process Control

‹ Accurate control of process conditions can prevent


fouling ( for applications where polymers can be
formed)

‹ Temperature control is the most important factor for


preventing polymer formations (i.e. Ethylene cracked
gas, Fluid catalytic cracker off-gas FSS)

‹ Critical temperature above fouling occurs varies with


each process, compressor, application

‹ Monitoring of process is required to establish the


temperature threshold for each case

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fouling – Online Fluid Injection
‹..injecting a small amount of solvent to reduce the friction
coefficient of the blade and impeller surface (maintain the
surface wet) thus preventing the fouling to build up on the
surface
‹ The injection shall be done from the start (new equipment /
overhauled) , if not the fouling deposit could be dislodged
and moved downstream (blockage)
‹ Injection objective is to prevent fouling accumulations, not
to provide on line cleaning of the impeller / blade
‹ Non continuous solvent injection program will allow the
impeller / blade to dry and promote fouling

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fouling – Online Fluid Injection
‹ Critical factors that ensure fouling will not form:
• Type of injection spray nozzles
• Location of the spray nozzles
• Selection of solvent
‹ Solvent vapor pressure and internal comp
temperatures is necessary to determine if stage
or section solvent injection is applicable
‹ Typically amount of solvent injection is 1-2 % of
total mass flow. Excessive injection could erode
leading edge blade tips, causing impeller fatigue

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Online Fluid Injection
‹ Solvent injection:
• Purpose is to maintain a wet surface to prevent fouling material
sticking (typically Naphtha based solvent)
• Injected at suction pipe of each section (Spool piece)
• Injected at compressor return bends regardless gas temperature
• 0.5 to 1.0% of total gas weight flow at each section is effective, but not
exceed 3% of total gas weight flow

‹ H2O injection:
• Purpose is to reduce gas temperature ( by evaporation of water)
• Injected at return bends where discharge gas temperature is high
• Demi water (boiler feed water), with low oxygen content is
recommended. Filters to be installed at upstream of spray nozzle to
prevent clogging

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fluid Injection at Suction Nozzle

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Fluid Injection at Return Bend

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Online Fluid Injection
F Flowmeter Water Injection Nozzle
Solvent
PG Pressure Gauge Water Injection Connecting
Injection H2O
Piping (By Customer)
Valve Tank Tank
Optional Solvent Injection Nozzle
BFW Pump Optional Solvent Injection (Optional)
(By Customer) Connecting Piping (By Customer)
>20
kg/cm2
BFW PUMP

F F F F F F
PG PG PG PG PG PG
“A”

“A” F F F F F F F
Stg Stg Stg Stg Stg Stg PG PG PG PG PG PG PG
1 2 3 1 2 3
Sect 1 4M7-6 Sect 2 Stg Stg Stg Stg Stg Stg Stg
1 2 3 1 2 3 4
Sect 3 2M9-7 Sect 4

“B” “B”
F F
F F PG PG
PG PG

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Coatings - Purpose

‹ Prevent the base metal from external attack


‹ Protect the blades against oxidation, corrosion, and
cracking problems
‹ Extend the life of the impeller (protect the blades by being
sacrificial by allowing coating to be restripped and recoated)
‹ Improve surface smoothness in order to reduce:

• friction in lieu of solvent injection


• erosion on compressor blades

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Engineered Coatings – “Cold Coatings”
‹…. A Sacrificial Barrier Coating System with a Base
Coat and Multiple Topcoats

‹ Benefits:
• Corrosion
a) Protection • Fouling
• Erosion

b) Improved Operation • Smoother Surface Finish


• Improved Resistance to Fouling
• Improved Efficiency
• Improved Reliability

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
D-R Corrosion / Antifoulant Coating
System EEC-C1

Hard Top Seal Coat

Sacrificial Base Coat

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
D-R Anti-foulant Coating System
EEC-A2 &A3

PTFE Top Coat


Barrier Coat

Sacrificial
Base Coat

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Anti-Foulant Coating

EEC - A2

EEC - A3

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Engineered Coatings – Thermal
Coatings
‹A metallic particle spray overlay applied by a High
Velocity Oxy Fuel (HVOF) Process
‹ Benefits:
• Dimensional Restoration
• Protection
• Wear
• Erosion

• Improved Wear Characteristics


• Improved Reliability

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Engineered Coatings – Thermal
Coatings
‹A metallic particle spray overlay applied by a High
Velocity Oxy Fuel (HVOF) Process
‹ Benefits:
• Dimensional Restoration
• Protection
• Wear
• Erosion

• Improved Wear Characteristics


• Improved Reliability

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
HVOF Applied EEC - TC Coatings
Piston Rods

Impellers
Rotor Shafts

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Coatings - SermaLon® Coating
‹ The SermaLon coating system
consists of:
• Al-filled chromate/phosphate
bond coat;
• Intermediate high temperature
polymeric inhibitive coating
• PTFE impregnated topcoat
(provides a barrier against
corrosion and excellent resistance
to fouling)

‹ The coating system provides excellent protection to 403 and 410


stainless substrates when exposed to corrosive steam conditions or
low pH wet chloride environments

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
Coatings - SermaLon® Coating
Advantages
‹ Smooth surface finish and PTFE impregnated
topcoat contribute to performance recovery and
reduced fouling rate
‹ Excellent bond strength
‹ High resistance to corrosion fatigue

Applications
‹Centrifugal compressors exposed to
wet chlorides or excessive fouling
‹ Steam turbine components exposed
to corrosive steam;

© 2006 Dresser-Rand
www.dresser-rand.com
info@dresser-rand.com

© 2006 Dresser-Rand

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen