You are on page 1of 15

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Clin. Psychol. Psychother.

18, 498–511 (2011) Published online 27 May 2010 in Wiley Online Library ( DOI: 10.1002/cpp.704

Adult Attachment Insecurity and Narrative Processes in Psychotherapy: An Exploratory Study†
Sarah I. F. Daniel*
The University Clinic, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Different types of client attachment insecurity may affect the psychotherapeutic process in distinct ways. This exploratory study compared the in-session discourse of clients with dismissing and preoccupied attachment states of mind on Adult Attachment Interviews conducted prior to therapy in the context of a randomized clinical trial of psychoanalytic and cognitive–behavioural psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. In a subsample of six sessions from each of eight therapy dyads, preoccupied clients were found to talk more and have longer speaking turns than dismissing clients, who in turn generated more pauses. Using the Narrative Processes Coding System, preoccupied clients were found to show more narrative initiative; whereas, differences in terms of narrative process modes were not as clearly interpretable. Contrary to expectations, the two insecure states of mind were equally different in the relationship-focused psychoanalytic therapy and in the symptom-focused cognitive–behavioural therapy. Suggestions for further investigations of the in-session discourse of clients with different attachment states of mind are given. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message: • Client adult attachment patterns are likely to affect psychotherapeutic processes. • Client insecure dismissing and insecure preoccupied attachment may be detectable in distinct in-session discourse styles. • More research is needed on in-session manifestations of client attachment patterns and their relation to therapeutic outcome. Keywords: Adult Attachment, Psychotherapeutic Processes, Narrative Process, Verbal Productivity

In the literature on client characteristics that impact psychotherapy process and outcome, a growing attention is given to the topic of adult attachment (Daniel, 2006; Norcross, 2002; Obegi & Berant, 2009). Attachment theory was originated by Bowlby (1969/1997, 1973/1998, 1980/1998) and deals with the central role that early relations to caregivers play in psychological health and in shaping the ways in which later interpersonal relationships are approached and handled. Adult attachment patterns or styles are developmentally formed ways of

* Correspondence to: Sarah I. F. Daniel, Department of Psychology, 2A Oester Farimagsgade, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: † This manuscript was prepared as part of a PhD project at the University of Copenhagen funded by a grant from the Danish Research Council for the Humanities. Transcription of therapy sessions was generously supported by the Aase & Ejnar Danielsen Foundation.

regulating affect and processing information with respect to close interpersonal relationships (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). Since adult attachment patterns are related to attitudes towards seeking and receiving help and to distinct ways of engaging in emotionally significant relationships, client attachment patterns are likely to affect psychotherapeutic processes. One of the central approaches to measuring adult attachment patterns is the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) (George, Kaplan, & Main, 1996; Main, Goldwyn, & Hesse, 2002), which has been used extensively in developmental psychology research and has demonstrated good psychometric properties (Bakermans Kranenburg & Van Ijzendoorn, 1993; Crowell, et al., 1996; Sagi, van IJzendoorn, Scharf, & Koren-Karie, 1994). The AAI operationalizes adult ‘states of mind with respect to attachment’ in terms of different patterns of coherence and collaboration in narrating about attachment-related experiences (Main, Hesse, & Goldwyn, 2008). The classification system distinguishes between three main categories: secure interviews are balanced, open and coherent;

Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Dozier (1990) found that greater security was associated with more compliance with treatment. the contrast between dismissing and preoccupied attachment insecurity merits attention.e. Dozier. In a related study. Such differences in attention. 2008). van Ijzendoorn & Bakermans Kranenburg.. Dozier. and Egeland (1997) investigated client behaviour in an intervention programme for mothers at risk. preoccupied interviews contain long-winded and confusing accounts that are marked by continued emotional entanglement. at the same time. Stovall. and Janssens (2006) found that secure attachment was related to a greater increase in reliance on the primary contact figure in the institution. more likely to reject help and less likely to self-disclose as compared with more hyperactivating (i. 1995. & Albus. and often marked by inherent contradictions between general. Dozier and colleagues investigated correlates of attachment in a psychiatric setting using Kobak’s Q-sort method of coding AAIs. Thus. 1999). whereas. since the challenges of working with clients who appear distant and emotionally unengaged are likely to be fundamentally different from the challenges of working with clients who appear overinvolved and demanding. more research is clearly necessary to posit such differential treatment implications confidently. & Cicchetti. which requires clients to engage in a collaborative dialogue about emotionally difficult topics and to provide a reasonably clear account of their situation in order for the therapist to empathize and intervene with precision (Daniel. and this may have important implications for psychotherapeutic technique (Holmes. In contrast Clin. In a study of adolescents treated at a youth institution. Heinicke and Levine (2008) found that secure mothers were more and increasingly involved in home visitation work. Evidence is emerging that it may be possible to facilitate client movement in the direction of secure states of mind through psychotherapy (Fonagy et al. Toth. partly because the preoccupied category is relatively infrequent in most western samples. persons with preoccupied states of mind are continually caught up in attachment-related experiences and hyperactivate the emotional responses related to the attachment behavioural system. and that clients who were high on deactivation (i. 2007). studying mothers who participated in a relation-based early intervention programme. insecure mothers were less and decreasingly involved. Rogosch. preoccupied clients may benefit more from working with therapists who do not amplify their emotional experiences. it is likely that the ‘road’ to security differs for these clients. Teague. These different narrative ‘surface structures’ are thought to be related to particular ways of regulating attention and emotion with regards to attachment that have their roots in childhood experiences (Magai. Dismissing mothers were less emotionally committed to treatment and more likely to prefer simple Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. there is a fair amount of evidence that attachment states of mind affect how clients engage in treatment and that secure clients are generally more involved and committed to treatment. Both studies had insufficient numbers of preoccupied mothers to consider that group. Schuengel. Persons with secure states of mind shift their attention flexibly between attachment and non-attachment related domains.. Levy et al. Ltd. The present study constitutes an explorative investigation of differences between psychotherapeutic process with dismissing and with preoccupied clients. 2000.. 1999. Fonagy et al. and Lee (2001) found that more deactivating clients spent less time on task when instructed to discuss an area of interpersonal difficulty with their case managers. 499 companionship to supportive therapy or problem-solving help than secure mothers were. Zegers. Psychother. However. Given the differences between the dismissing and the preoccupied categories. 2008). Lomax.. emotion-regulation and narrative coherence are clearly of relevance to psychotherapy. Persons with dismissing states of mind direct their attention away from attachment-related experiences and from the attachment component of relationships in an attempt to deactivate the attachment behavioural system and related feelings of needing or longing for comfort. 1995. Also. and a greater decrease in avoidance of contact with staff in the course of 10 months of treatment. 1996. Few studies have been able to compare the two primary groups of insecure clients. although it is more common in many clinical groups (Dozier. They are able to recognize their need for attachment figures and. 2009). A few studies have inquired into the in-treatment behaviour of clients with different attachment states of mind. such research may also throw more light on the mechanisms behind possible differential treatment implications. 18. positive evaluations of childhood experiences and lack of convincing autobiographical evidence.. Teti et al. In addition to providing information about the degree to which client attachment patterns may be detectable by clinicians through characteristic in-session processes.e. Psychol. Tyrrell. whereas. Mikulincer & Shaver. and Fallot (1999) suggests that dismissing clients may benefit more from working with therapists who challenge their distancing from emotions and interpersonal closeness. A study by Tyrrell. Ogawa. In contrast. Main. more dismissing) were less likely to seek out help. van Ijzendoorn. A first step in that direction is more research on the in-treatment manifestations of the different insecure attachment patterns. 1999. 2006. more preoccupied) clients. whereas. Adam. Slade.Attachment and Narrative Process in Therapy dismissing interviews are overly brief and unemotional. 1999. 498–511 (2011) . (2008) studied mothers’ commitment to an early intervention programme for at-risk mothers with premature babies and found that secure mothers were more involved compared with dismissing mothers. Korfmacher. remain psychologically separate. However.

& Rotondi-Trevisan. It is an integrative psychotherapy process coding system. S. In fact. 2004. attachment relationships are often discussed in PPT. Wallin. In contrast. Ward et al. Psychother. 2008). & Hesse. it is frequently assumed that the narrative characteristics exhibited in the AAI are similarly evident in psychotherapy process (Fish & Dudas. Dismissing and preoccupied AAIs differ markedly in their narrative style. Feldstein. 1999. Dismissing interviews cut short the examination of attachment relationships and offer little detail. Bouffard. 1991. 2006. Daniel The current study was conducted in the context of a randomized clinical trial of psychoanalytic psychotherapy (PPT) and cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy (CBT) for bulimia nervosa. 2001. a tendency that is also found in other parts of the attachmentrelated literature (Isabella & Belsky. PPT is non-directive. the related discourse patterns (Dozier & Bates. the prototypical dismissing and preoccupied interviews represent opposite extremes with the secure category occupying the ‘middle range’. 18. attachment relationships are not necessarily discussed. this study investigated three variables related to this: (a) the total amount of verbal production by the client in sessions (i. in psychotherapy. abstraction and referential activity. (1996) found that when applying an AAIlike classification strategy to an interview about employment experiences. 2004). and the verbal activity of the therapist may be very different from that of the AAI interviewer.500 to the primary focus on engagement and commitment in previous studies. Because of the limited knowledge in the area. Buchheim and Mergenthaler (2000) conducted a computer-assisted linguistic analysis of 30 AAIs categorized into the three main attachment states of mind.. specificity and imagery devised by Bucci (1995. PPT for bulimia is based on the theoretical premise that the eating disorder symptoms have their roots in difficulties in affect regulation that are primarily interpersonal in their origin. whereas. This sample is relevant to the present purpose in two ways. insecure attachment states of mind are prominent in bulimia nervosa and other eating disorders. Thus. PPT and CBT for bulimia are very distinct treatment forms that make it possible to explore whether intreatment expression of discourse patterns related to attachment states of mind is conditional on therapeutic exploration of attachment relationships. who consistently pushes for immersion in attachment themes. which play a central role in the AAI coding system (Main. they are unemotional or attempt to minimize emotion. They evaluated the transcripts with respect to emotion words. Fonagy et al. they may be flooded by emotion to the point where cooperation with the interviewer breaks down. which is a measure of narrative concreteness. a demonstration that clients’ in-session discourse is parallel in style to their discourse in the AAI would not be a trivial finding. 2001. this study also investigated the narrative material generated using the Narrative Processes Coding System (NPCS) devised by Angus. However.. CBT is highly therapist-directed. Crowell et al. attachment issues are seldom discussed in detail. whether they ‘hold the floor’ for long segments or quickly return the speaking turn to therapists. Lewin. Holmes. since theoretically. perhaps. Malatesta. First. the discourse characteristics exhibited in the AAI are thought to be specifically related to the activation of the attachment behavioural system. 2003). 498–511 (2011) .e. and Levitt (1996).. (b) the length of client speaking turns. Consequently. preoccupied transcripts scored highest. Preoccupied interviews offer extended and often long accounts with many (frequently irrelevant) details. Since one of the features that typically distinguishes dismissing and preoccupied speakers in the AAI is verbal productivity. On all these measures. Second. Sandros. Indeed. These variables speak to how active clients are in contributing to the therapy dialogue. Culver. which is brought about by the interviewer’s query into attachment history (Main. 1996. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. Goldwyn. 1995). the number of words uttered). Jaffe. Thus. Mergenthaler & Bucci. this is not necessarily the case. In the literature on client attachment and psychotherapy. this has not been demonstrated empirically. Clin. Main et al. 1999). Beebe. in terms of several discourse dimensions. Tesman. The NPCS conceptualizes the therapy dialogue as a narrative process in which client and therapist collaboratively explore and re-evaluate aspects of client ‘life stories’ (Angus. the present study took an exploratory and descriptive approach to the investigation of in-session discourse. secure transcripts were in between and dismissing transcripts were the lowest. On the other hand. at present.. & Shepard. and whether they pause before responding or fall silent in the course of their speaking turns. In addition to the variables related to verbal productivity. Thus. It might be that psychotherapy is an attachment-relevant situation by design. CBT for bulimia is a highly structured treatment that focuses on the eating disorder symptoms and takes a behavioural approach towards regulating these. and both dismissing and preoccupied patterns are represented in this group (Candelori & Ciocca. Parish & Eagle.. & Jasnow. 1998. the focus of the present study is on dialogical and narrative features. 1989). there was no overlap of classification in persons assessed with both interviews. there are no published studies systematically investigating the in-session discourse of psychotherapy clients. it may be hypothesized that attachment-related differences in in-session discourse of clients will be more easily detectable in PPT than in CBT. in that the process of seeking help might activate the attachment behavioural system and thus. F. Thus. Crown. 2007). whose attachment states of mind have been independently assessed. Ltd. Furthermore. 2002. 2001. To date. and (c) the number of pauses occurring in sessions. Ramacciotti et al. I. Hardtke. Psychol. 2001).

substance-related disorders. Preoccupied clients will engage in more internal and reflexive narrative Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. 1990). and (c) give informed written consent to participate in the study. 18. 1999). After each session. preoccupied clients may be expected to engage more in the therapeutic dialogue. Compared with dismissing clients. Finally. Psychol. the internal narrative mode. and preoccupied clients will tend to focus on the ‘landscape of consciousness’. or moderate or severe depression. psychological reality. the aim of the current study was to explore possible differences between in-session discourse with dismissing and preoccupied clients and to generate further suggestions for studies in the area.. The attachment data for the entire client sample are still not available. all clients complete a battery of questionnaires assessing various aspects of personality and psychopathology and participate in diagnostic interviews and in the AAI (George et al. the three narrative modes can be conceptualized in terms of the ‘dual landscape’ of narrative outlined by Bruner (1986. (c) current alcohol or substance abuse. Thus. it is tentatively hypothesized that. Psychother. hold the conversational turn longer and will pause less. The following hypotheses were posited: 1. 501 processes. Exclusion criteria are (a) concurrent organic disorders. 1996. 2006). dismissing clients will engage in more external narrative processes. (2004). In summary. and (f) difficulties in speaking and/or understanding the language. The NPCS has been found to distinguish between different therapy approaches and to make meaningful distinctions between different types of process in in-session dialogue (Levitt.8% dismissing and 42.0% secure. or they might not appear at all in CBT.Attachment and Narrative Process in Therapy which can be used in coding both of the relatively different therapy forms included in the sample. which may be discernible in a higher degree of narrative initiative. They will say more. 2002). which is presently conducted at a university-based psychotherapy research clinic (Lunn & Poulsen. 2002). 2004). Preoccupied clients will show more narrative initiative than dismissing clients. 36. dissociative disorders. Jurist. Ltd. Therapy sessions are recorded on minidisc by the therapists. which consists of descriptions of feeling states. the three-way distribution of attachment categories was 21. Preoccupied clients will be more verbally productive in sessions than dismissing clients. The therapy dialogue is divided into narrative sequences according to shifts between three different narrative process modes: (a) external narrative process where life events are related or facts or practical issues are described. (b) internal narrative process where feelings and other subjective experiences are articulated. or somatoform disorders if the disorder is judged to be a major obstacle to treatment of bulimia. The internal and reflexive modes comprise the ‘landscape of consciousness’ or the ‘subjective’. 1993. & Target. METHOD Study Context The study was carried out in the context of a randomized clinical trial of PPT and CBT for bulimia nervosa (N = 70). Also. but in an earlier study with a similar client population. Gergely. in public places and on the Internet.. (b) concurrent anxiety disorders. 3. Main et al. The sample consisted of four dismissing clients (two in PPT. would theoretically be expected to be less common with dismissing clients than with preoccupied clients.1% preoccupied (Sandros. clients and therapists complete a brief session evaluation form. schizophrenic spectrum disorders. Clients are randomly assigned to the two treatments with block randomization stratifying for current psychopharmacological treatment and personality disorder. (b) fulfil the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. (d) somatic illness that will interfere with psychotherapy. This classification is purely descriptive and does not imply an evaluation of the quality of these processes. as argued by Angus et al. 498–511 (2011) . Levitt & Angus. At intake. Dismissing and preoccupied clients may differ in their attention to and willingness to discuss outer and inner/psychological realities with their therapists. whereas both dismissing and preoccupied clients will have difficulties in coherently integrating these two narrative landscapes (Fonagy. 2. The external narrative mode comprises the ‘landscape of action’ or the ‘objective’. two in CBT) and four preoccupied clients (two in PPT. outer reality. The differences between preoccupied and dismissing clients will be larger in PPT than in CBT. Participants Eight therapies from the Bulimia Trial were selected based on client intake AAI category and treatment type. Clients are required to (a) be at least 18 years old. Clients are recruited through advertisements in magazines. which can be interpreted as an index of how active each speaker is in ‘shaping’ the pattern of shifting between topics and narrative modes. two Clin. dismissing clients will tend to focus on the ‘landscape of action’. Each narrative sequence is also coded with respect to who initiates it. whereas. (e) pregnancy or other plans interfering with treatment. manic and bipolar disturbances. and (c) reflexive narrative process where events or feelings are analysed and discussed with respect to patterns or meaning. Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for a diagnosis of bulimia nervosa. and through a network of clinics and psychiatric hospitals.

To code the AAI.3) and in terms of overall psychological distress as measured by the general severity index of the Symptom-Checklist-90-R (Derogatis. SD = 0. Lunn & Poulsen. interviews are assigned to one of five major categories: secure. dismissing even if they were also unresolved. Psychol. etc. Psychother. The aim of CBT is to break the vicious cycle of dieting and bingeing by establishing a regular eating pattern and correcting the cognitive distortions related to the disorder. 1999). dismissing or preoccupied in their narrative style. and in two cases. 2005) and were supervised bi-weekly by Susanne Lunn and Stig Poulsen (PPT) or Christopher Fairburn (through video conference) (CBT). Two clients in each group were diagnosed with one or more personality disorders based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (Spitzer. 1990). Measures AAI The AAI is a semi-structured interview with 20 questions and standardized probes (George et al. All had completed the equivalent of high school education. and these are systematically explored.... The therapy consists of weekly sessions for a period of 2 years. who fulfilled the selection criteria in terms of attachment and distribution across therapy types. and their responses aim at helping clients to acknowledge and Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. the AAI was administered by post-graduate psychology candidates who were trained and supervised by certified AAI coders. No clients in the sample had the same therapist. Daniel reflect on their inner world of experience. When scoring the AAIs. The interviewee is asked about the relationship to childhood attachment figures and attachment-related topics such as separations. 1996). The groups of dismissing and preoccupied clients were relatively comparable in terms of age (dismissing: M = 25. preoccupied: M = 26. F. Wilson. Three other certified AAI coders scored a random sample of four of the eight AAIs to check inter-rater reliability. The AAI has been found to have good reliability and discriminant validity (Bakermans et al. Based on scores on the ‘state of mind’ scales and on the presence of global category descriptors. clients who dropped out before the completion of 20 therapy sessions were not included. who is certified as an AAI coder. CBT for Bulimia CBT for bulimia was developed by Christopher Fairburn (2008) and is one of the best validated treatments for bulimia (Agras. In general. 18. only the three-way classification of secure. Interviews classified as unresolved or cannot classify are also given a secondary classification as secure. 1993. The therapists were trained according to the specific treatment manuals (Fairburn. Six therapists were female and two were male.. I. . In two cases. Clients are given homework assignments. and therapists consistently focus on the eating disorder.0. dismissing. To keep the sample as homogenous as possible except for type of attachment insecurity. & First. The interview is transcribed verbatim and rated on 16 nine-point scales. losses. dismissing and/or preoccupied (Main et al. preoccupied: M = 1. The clients were women of Scandinavian origin with an average age of 25. The author. 498–511 (2011) Treatments PPT for Bulimia PPT for bulimia (Lunn & Poulsen. Crowell et al. Thus. the author was blind with regards to which treatment type the clients had been assigned to..38. dismissing or preoccupied was used. 2008. preoccupied.0. 2005) is a nondirective therapy based on a psychoanalytic understanding of the bulimic symptoms that are thought to be rooted in difficulties in affect awareness and regulation. Fairburn. 2000). The other 11 scales evaluate different aspects of the speaker’s ‘state of mind with respect to attachment’. scored the AAIs from the intake assessment.3). and for whom usable sound recordings of the therapy sessions were available.24) (possible scores range from 0 to 4). Therapists allow clients to direct the choice of topics. In contrast to the three primary AAI classifications. and to be able to sample from a comparable range of sessions. Five of these scales evaluate aspects of childhood experience as inferred by the coder. being ill. It is a highly structured therapy consisting of 20 sessions with fixed agendas. 1994) (dismissing: M = 1. When selecting the current sample. Gibbon. two out of three additional coders agreed with the classification made by the author.91. coders have to attend a 2-week training workshop with approved trainers and to achieve at least 80% agreement with the norm on a subsequent reliability check consisting of 30 interviews (Hesse. that is.. 2002). The therapists were experienced psychologists or psychiatrists with expert training in either PPT or CBT.2. The clients included in the study were the first eight clients in the Bulimia Trial.502 in CBT). four were students and four were employed. SD = 0. SD = 7. 1996).5 years (standard deviation [SD] = 5. the unresolved classification may be assigned based on brief passages in interviews that are otherwise secure. Williams. S. In the Bulimia Trial. interviews categorized as Clin. the bulimic symptoms are not necessarily discussed in every session.g. Walsh. SD = 3. all three additional coders agreed with the classification made by the author.29. & Kraemer. unresolved or cannot classify. clients were included as e. and the therapists were not informed about client attachment patterns. Ltd.

Line numbers in the therapy transcripts served as a rough ‘time unit’ in comparing the coding of raters. Client Version (SEF-C) The SEF-C is a four-item questionnaire developed specifically for use in the Bulimia Trial. 1996). At the meetings. Levitt.. Pauses were timed by the transcriber and were indicated in the session transcripts. ratings of session difficulty utilize the whole seven-point scale. and reflexive process refers to analysis and interpretation of events or feelings. All coders attended an introductory lecture on the NPCS. Psychol. Murray. Counts of Words. Three seconds was chosen as the lower limit of meaningful silence based on previous research (Frankel. each coder coded at least seven full sessions. Training of NPCS Coders Eleven university students volunteered to code the therapy sessions. 1996).78–0. Levitt. & Angus. the three sessions experienced as most difficult and the three sessions experienced as least difficult were selected. Sessions without a usable sound recording and sessions with participation of family members (in CBT) were excluded. 18. Ltd. the coders received detailed feedback. it was administered at intake as part of a larger battery of self-report instruments NPCS Inter-rater Reliability Procedure Selection of Therapy Sessions A sample of six of the first 20 sessions from each of the eight therapy dyads was selected for further analysis. Session Evaluation Form. Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report instrument that asks clients to rate different depressive symptoms on a fourpoint scale.Attachment and Narrative Process in Therapy unresolved are most frequently secondarily classified as preoccupied. Kappa was calculated based on the number of topic shifts agreed upon. clients are requested to give their ratings on a seven-point Likert scale of (1) the degree to which they consider the session to have been valuable/useful. coders were considered to agree on a topic shift if they placed shifts less than six transcript lines apart (the average length of topic segments in the material was 50 transcript lines). To obtain a varied sample of therapy process. In the Bulimia Trial. and (4) the degree to which they had trust in their therapist in the session. the number of shifts identified only by rater B and the number of agreements on the non-presence of Clin. 2006). With raters trained for 20–25 hours. Whereas client ratings of items 1. yielding 991 transcript pages. Greenberg. Speaking Turns and Pauses Counts of the number of words uttered by clients per session and per speaking turn were conducted using the C-I-SAID software (Cartwright. External process refers to the description of events or facts. who was trained and supervised by Lynne Angus. and five were graduate psychology students. The intake session that consisted mostly of history-taking and introduction to the treatment was not included. (3) the degree to which they felt understood by their therapist in the session. Sessions are first subdivided into topic segments according shifts in semantic content. 2003). in which sessions from therapies with bulimic clients were transcribed and coded with NPCS by the author. After each session. 1999). The author had five to six 2-hour meetings with the coders. NPCS The NPCS is a psychotherapy process coding system that is applied to session transcripts (Angus et al. During the training period. On recommendation from Lynne Angus. internal or reflexive. The BDI-II is widely used and has shown good psychometric properties. The number of pauses at or above 3 seconds in all sessions were counted using the search and replace function of an ordinary word processor. and two of the preoccupied clients in the current sample were also unresolved. sessions were selected Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. Scores are summed to give a total score that may range from 0 to 63 (Beck. the number of shifts identified only by rater A. Clients categorized as cannot classify were not included. respectively. Steer. 498–511 (2011) . Six were undergraduate psychology students. The coders practiced on material from a pilot study. 3 and 4 are generally highly skewed towards the high end of the scale. All 48 sessions were transcribed by a professional agency using a slightly modified version of the transcription guidelines developed by Mergenthaler and Stinson (1992). 503 based on client ratings of session difficulty on the SEF-C. & Hardtke. who coded one or two full sessions between meetings. They were split in two teams that specialized in dividing the sessions into topic segments and in dividing topic segments into narrative sequences. Psychother. & Brown. For each client. Topic segments and narrative sequences are also coded with respect to who initiates them. internal process refers to the description of feelings or other inner experiences. good inter-rater agreement has been found on identification of topic segments as well as on coding of narrative process (Cohen’s κ = 0. and difficulties in rating the sessions were thoroughly discussed.86) (Angus. NPCS inter-rater reliability in terms of Cohen’s κ was calculated using methods described in Bakeman and Gottman (1997). (2) the degree to which they consider the session to have been difficult. The topic segments are further subdivided in terms of three narrative process modes: external.

RESULTS Data Set and Data Analysis The data set consisted of six sessions from each of eight therapy dyads. A small number of narrative sequences (21 out of 1292) could not be coded Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. internal or reflexive. in distinguishing internal from other codes. distributed as evenly across therapy types and client attachment categories as allowed by coding logistics. Even though most sessions lasted about 50 minutes. inter-rater agreement on narrative initiative was calculated based on all instances where coders started new narrative sequences within two transcript lines of each other.71. F. Psychol. the topic segmenting coders achieved an average agreement with the author of κ = 0.504 shifts (i. At the end of training. The coder.90). the topic segmenting coders achieved an agreement of κ = 0. Each of the 48 sessions was first given to two topic segmenting coders. since they were considered ambiguous with respect to whether they should be allocated to the ‘landscape of action’ or the ‘landscape of consciousness’.75–0. all coders were asked to recode a session from the training material to check for possible rater drift. these sequences were excluded from the analysis pertaining to narrative process modes.8–73 minutes).78 (range 0. only 148 lines (0.91.83–0. Since some of the dependent variables might change with time across the six months of therapy. In the present study.66–0.81 (range 0. therapy dyads).59–0. In distinguishing external from other codes.e. the total number of transcript lines minus the number of shifts agreed upon and the number of shifts disagreed upon). Since coding of who initiates narrative sequences can only be compared when coders agree on the delineation of narrative sequences. given that all sessions were subsequently consensus-coded. the analyses also allowed for a random slope for time (defined by session number) within therapy dyads. During the coding period. NPCS Coding Procedure The NPCS coders were blind with regards to client attachment categorization as well as the hypotheses of the study.83. and in distinguishing reflexive from other codes. which occurred only in PPT. All analyses allowed for random intercepts for therapy dyads. the sessions were of unequal duration (range 36. Inter-rater reliability on narrative sequencing was calculated as time-based kappa’s of the line-by-line agreement on narrative mode categorization using the GSW software (Bakeman & Quera. .90. Only the consensus coding was used in the further analyses.72.75 (range 0. Since the material was considered difficult to code.88 (range 0.94). Each member of a pair first coded each session individually and submitted the coding to the author who calculated inter-rater agreement. These sequences were also excluded from the analysis pertaining to narrative process modes. I. The dependent variables examined were all measured at the level of sessions. 18. which is not accounted for by the explanatory variables: client attachment state of mind and therapy type. The narrative sequencing coders achieved an agreement of κ = 0. In multilevel analysis. This indicated problems with the coding for internal process. Cohen’s κ was also calculated separately for each of the three narrative process modes.79) on the line-by-line presence of topic shifts.5%) were coded as internal by one or both coders. and thus raw counts of the number of words and pauses Clin. and direct instruction from the therapist with respect to what clients should do (n = 17). the agreement was κ = 0. it is possible to take into consideration the random variation between superordinate clusters of data (in this case. Out of the 30 088 transcript lines in the data material. and when they had negotiated a consensus coding.. 2007). Ltd.20.59 to 0. The topic segmenting coders achieved an average agreement with the author of κ = 0. These were descriptions of events taking place in dreams (n = 4).57–0. which was also very rare in the material. the agreement was κ = 0. Daniel for narrative process mode.72–0. There was no evidence of formation of coding subcultures in the coder pairs.77) on classifying transcript lines as external. Since sessions from the same dyad are non-independent. such an approach is definitely called for. 2008). which occurred only in CBT. since the intra-class correlation coefficients of the dependent variables range from 0. the marked transcript was passed on to two narrative sequencing coders. it became necessary to include an extra coder in the team of topic segmenters. Because of the low inter-rater agreement on the internal narrative mode. Each coder coded between 12 and 24 sessions. was similarly trained by the author and achieved a reliability of κ = 0.83).71 (range 0.68 (range 0.85). S. This level of agreement was considered satisfactory. Towards the end of the coding period that lasted about a year. The agreement on coding of narrative initiator was κ = 0. who had an MA in psychology. and the narrative sequencing coders achieved an average agreement with the author of κ = 0. 498–511 (2011) Inter-rater Agreement and Stability of NPCS Coders When coding the study material. the coders negotiated a consensus coding. The main explanatory variables: client attachment state of mind and therapy type were measured at the level of therapy dyads. and the narrative sequencing coders achieved an average agreement with the author of κ = 0. the coders achieved an agreement of κ = 0. the coders worked in pairs. and since there might also be dyad-dependent variation in the rate of change. Subsequently. data analysis was conducted by means of multilevel mixedeffects modelling (Rabe-Hesketh & Skrondal. Psychother.

41. To control for the possible effect of this difference.e.Attachment and Narrative Process in Therapy were not directly comparable. 18. In the present sample. The number of client words per session minute decreased. p < 0. whereas.3. p = 0. a significant main effect of therapy type (B = −48. therapy type and time. p = 0.4 words per session minute. depression scores on the BDI-II (Beck. whereas. preoccupied clients in PPT uttered 138. AAI unresolved score and session difficulty were also considered. z = 3. Consequently. SE = 1.40. SE = 10. SD = 1.027). Lowered speech rate has been related to depression (Ellgring & Scherer. In CBT. in the present sample. a significant main effect of therapy type (B = −61.84. with session difficulty set to 4 and client unresolved score set to 1.001) and a significant main effect of session difficulty (B = −3. Although not statistically significant. 1996) ranged from 8 to 29 and were slightly. p < 0. SD = 8.5. p = 0.97.25).0.18. preoccupied clients uttered 77. whereas. Client depression and client unresolved score were not related to this variable. SD = 2. There was a significant main effect of client attachment state of mind (B = 31.37. which has in turn been related to the dismissing category in some studies (Patrick. z = −1.0 has to be given on a rating scale for unresolved loss or trauma.1 words per speaking turn. SE = 15. The NPCS variables were evaluated in terms of proportions. client-rated session difficulty was included in the analyses as a fixed effect. whereas. as session difficulty increased. which can range from 1. 498–511 (2011) Verbal Productivity Variables When analyzing the variables related to verbal productivity. Psychol.004) and a significant main effect of client unresolved score (B = −9. p = 0.0. the number of client words in sessions was divided by session duration in terms of minutes.0. standard error [SE] = 10. dismissing clients were estimated to utter 46. and all possible two-way interaction terms were considered. Main effects of client BDI-II score. since the current level of depression of clients might affect the verbal productivity variables. 505 mind.7 words per speaking turn.46. SE = 0. The number of words per client speaking turn decreased as session difficulty increased and as client unresolved score increased.080) and of time (B = 4.2.41. SE = 1. Howard.3. Hobson.0. there was no evidence of time-effects and no significant interaction between client attachment and therapy type. SD = 2.91. dismissing: M = 4. & Brown. this study instead evaluated relative durations of narrative modes in sessions (in terms of word counts) to more accurately reflect the ‘time-budget’ representation of the different narrative process modes (Bakeman & Gottman.016).0). p = 0. 1994).88. it was estimated that dismissing clients in PPT uttered 107. In CBT.001).8. SE = 24.5.2. z = 3.13.96. SE = 1. possible main effects of client attachment state of Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. it was estimated that dismissing clients in PPT uttered 70. the difficulty ratings of dismissing clients tended to be higher than those of preoccupied clients (preoccupied: M = 3. starting with the full model and gradually excluding non-significant terms. For the number of client words per session minute.03).6 words per session minute.2 words per speaking turn. z = −5. z = 2. preoccupied clients uttered 84. proportion of narrative sequences initiated by the client (versus the therapist) and proportion of words coded as external (versus reflexive). Based on this model. .002).2.84.21. z = −2. i. z = −3.8) than in the group of preoccupied clients (M = 17. The final model included a significant Client Attachment × Time interaction (B = −2. To be assigned to the category unresolved. and the number of pauses was divided by session duration in terms of hours to yield comparable and interpretable indices. Castle.55.0 to 9.26. Steer.06. p = 0.7 words per speaking turn.1. Although narrative process modes have usually been evaluated in terms of relative frequencies of sequences categorized into different modes. client BDI score was included in these analyses as a fixed effect. though not significantly. dismissing: M = 1. a score of at least 5. sessions had been chosen based on high or low ratings of session difficulty on the SEF-C. the preoccupied clients had higher unresolved scores than the dismissing clients (preoccupied: M = 4. p = 0. Figure 1 shows the estimated number of pauses per session hour with dismissing and preoccupied clients Clin. preoccupied clients in PPT uttered 132. SD = 8.001). Client depression did not affect this variable.4 words per session minute.52. SE = 12.027) as well as the main effects of client attachment state of mind (B = −42. In the present sample. and since session difficulty might conceivably affect some of the variables studied.0. client unresolved score was included in all analyses.75. there was no time-effect and no significant interaction between client attachment and therapy type.7. z = −3. client unresolved score and session difficulty did not affect this variable. The proportion variables were subjected to a logit transformation for inclusion in the linear analyses. There was a significant main effect of client attachment state of mind (B = 61. Client depression. Psychother.50.38.0. 1997). A limitation of the current sample was that two of the four preoccupied clients were also categorized as unresolved on the AAI. To control for this difference. For the number of pauses per session hour.6 words per session minute. Based on this model.. SD = 1. a significant main effect of session difficulty (B = −3. For the average number of words per client speaking turn. 1996). z = −2.8. z = −2. dismissing clients were estimated to utter 22. higher in the group of dismissing clients (M = 20.88. To maximize session variability. However.001). with session difficulty set to 4. SE = 3. p < 0. Ltd. & Maughan. neither alone or in interaction with client attachment or with time. therapy type had no significant effect.1.

whereas. For the proportion of narrative process categorized as external (versus reflexive) in each session. evidenced in a high proportion of external process.07. the estimated proportion of external process with dismissing clients in PPT is 25. the number of pauses in therapies with preoccupied clients tends to remain stable across the 20 sessions. possible main effects of client attachment state of mind. z = 4. and with preoccupied clients in CBT it is 39. Linear prediction of number of pauses ≥ 3 seconds per hour across sessions for each client attachment state of mind across the 20 sessions based on this model. Psychother. Daniel 2 4 6 8 10 12 Session 14 16 18 20 Figure 1. in terms of proportions of narrative modes. starting with the full model and gradually excluding non-significant terms. SE = 1. as well as the main effects of client attachment state of mind (B = 1.04. SE = 0. in PPT. 498–511 (2011) .12.0%.70. it was 20.87. and the number of pauses tends to increase across the 20 sessions.10. whereas.23.014). Clin.014). the proportion of external process tends to decrease across the 20 sessions.6%.27.46. p = 0. p = 0.001) and of time (B = 0. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. the estimated percentage of narrative sequences initiated by dismissing clients was 19. The final model included Client Attachment × Therapy Type (B = −1. SE = 0. in PPT there is a slight increase in the proportion of external process. Narrative Initiative and Narrative Process Modes When analysing the NPCS variables. SE = 0. whereas.17. and time. p < 0. which eventually gives way to an increased focus on the cognitive distortions behind the eating disorder.2 with preoccupied clients. the corresponding number for preoccupied clients was 32. In therapies with dismissing clients. Based on this model. z = 2. whereas. p = 0.05.0%. p = 0. both Client Attachment × Therapy Type and Therapy Type × Time were statistically significant. In CBT.4%. therapy type.002). In CBT. z = −3.2%. At session 10. SE = 0.067). z = −12.3%.506 140 Dismissing 120 Pauses per session hour 100 80 60 40 20 0 Preoccupied S.71. in PPT. the corresponding number for preoccupied clients was 81. it is the other way around. I.46.78.001). Psychol. F.6%. Client unresolved score and session difficulty did not affect this variable.001) and a significant main effect of therapy type (B = −2. Therapy Type × Time (B = −0. z = −2. whereas.05. the proportion of external process is higher with dismissing clients than with preoccupied clients. p < 0. In CBT.16. and all possible two-way interaction terms were considered. resulting in higher proportions of reflexive process.51. the estimated number of pauses per hour at session 10 was 91. This corresponds well to an initial strong behavioural focus in CBT. For the proportion of narrative sequences initiated by clients (versus therapists) in each session there was no time-effect and no significant interaction between client attachment and therapy type. z = 1. there are more pauses. SE = 0. SE = 0. the estimated percentage of narrative sequences initiated by dismissing clients was 68. the two therapy types are more different in the early sessions and more alike around session 20.98. z = 4. Figure 2 shows the estimated percentage of narrative process categorized as external (versus reflexive) with dismissing and preoccupied clients in each therapy form across the 20 sessions based on this model. Client unresolved score and session difficulty did not affect this variable. 18. although the difference here is much smaller.17. with dismissing clients in CBT it is 68. Based on this model.8%. Thus. of therapy type (B = 4. Main effects of client AAI unresolved score and session difficulty were also considered.9 with dismissing clients.83. whereas. p < 0. There was a significant main effect of client attachment state of mind (B = 0. with preoccupied clients in PPT it is 31. Ltd.61.

Attachment and Narrative Process in Therapy 100% 90% External mode percentage 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2 4 6 8 10 Session 12 14 16 18 20 Dismissing . The results should be interpreted with caution. the present finding that client score on the AAI unresolved scale was related to the length of speaking turns suggests that even though unresolved status is not generally related to a particular overall narrative style. these different styles might just be different ‘flavouring’ of the therapy interaction with no immediate relevance to treatment outcome. Furthermore. a number of significant differences between therapies with dismissing and preoccupied clients were detected. future studies should consider secure and unresolved attachment as well.CBT Preoccupied . Psychother. Ltd. and the small sample size of this study increases the risk that accidental combinations of particular client and therapist characteristics in the eight dyads may have influenced the results. Nevertheless. Linear prediction of percentage of external (versus reflexive) narrative process across sessions for client attachment states of mind in each of two therapy types DISCUSSION This exploratory study examined a small number of therapy dyads (N = 8) in relative detail. The dependent variables analysed are likely to be affected by other client variables than attachment. It is quite probable that verbal productivity does not contribute much to the distinction between secure and insecure clients. respectively. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. This should be replicated and expanded in larger and more varied client samples. with a middle range of productivity representing the most favourable therapeutic process. Thus. it does contribute to the distinction between types of insecurity. which necessarily limits generalizability. an attempt should be made to relate the verbal productivity variables to treatment outcome. consisting only of women who completed at least 20 sessions of outpatient psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. it would be important to know. it may still be relevant in relation to in-session narrative process.PPT Preoccupied . It seems reasonable to interpret the two extremes with respect to verbal productivity as ‘underproductive’ and ‘overproductive’. it would be important to investigate whether clients with low and high verbal productivity generally have poorer treatment outcomes. by other therapist variables than therapy type. 18. Thus. since the small sample size renders the study vulnerable to strong influences from idiosyncratic patterns of the particular client-therapist dyads included. Clin. Assuming that the difference in verbal productivity can be replicated in other studies. whether secure clients are indeed ‘midrange’ as would be expected. or whether it is just the dismissing or the preoccupied group who constitute an extreme. Furthermore.PPT Dismissing . whereas. 498–511 (2011) . The verbal productivity difference between dismissing and preoccupied clients lends some support to the idea that attachment-related differences in discourse style are also detectable in psychotherapy sessions.CBT 507 Figure 2. which suggests that it would be sufficient to sample a few sessions from each dyad to test this finding in a larger sample. some additional issues would need to be addressed to make sense of this difference and evaluate its clinical relevance and utility. Psychol. To evaluate the possible role that verbal productivity might play in an informal process evaluation of client attachment. and by client–therapist relationship factors. verbal productivity in terms of words uttered per minute and length of speaking turns were relatively stable from session to session in each dyad. the main value of the present study lies in the guidelines it provides for further research in the area. In the present study. In spite of the low statistical power. Also. the client population was very select. who may mainly differ in their degree of narrative coherence. Thus.

2006). The relative absence of pauses with preoccupied clients may reflect a tendency to ‘fill’ the sessions with verbal activity. obstructive or neutral (Frankel et al.. it may also reflect a greater reluctance to self-disclose. Further studies on attachment states of mind and pauses should address qualitative aspects of silences to make sense of the quantitative findings. concrete realities. The client group might also be important since eating disorders have been linked to difficulties in verbalizing feeling states (Speranza et al. it was tentatively hypothesized that dismissing clients would focus more on the external mode relating to descriptions of outer. Slade (1999. Thus. preoccupied clients engage in more psychological considerations. 2005). they give therapists more material to work with. but the tendency in PPT was in the opposite direction. The present study was inspired by the premise that although insecure clients are generally more difficult to treat than secure clients. the present study suggests that future studies inquiring into in-session emotionality related to client attachment states of mind should probably include a wider range of emotional expression. 498–511 (2011) . but it would be relevant to evaluCopyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. the higher number of pauses with dismissing clients may evidence more reflection. Psychother. and perhaps a rise in defensiveness as therapy increasingly pushes for involvement. which distinguishes between different categories of silence such as e. In her much cited chapter on attachment states of mind and psychotherapy. clients with different insecure attachment states of mind may be difficult in very different ways. helpless. but rather on discussion Clin. preoccupied clients make the therapist feel ‘swamped. This may make it harder for therapists to attune empathically and may also generate doubts about the clients’ commitment to treatment. it may also reflect more emotional engagement. and dysregulated’. where the proportion of external process tended to be larger with dismissing clients than with preoccupied clients. The difference between dismissing and preoccupied clients in CBT might be a result of dismissing clients electing to focus more on the tangible aspects of the eating disorder. reflective and disengaged silences that may be evaluated as either productive. Such experiences may be partly related to clients’ patterns of verbal productivity and narrative initiative. e. Psychol. S. Compared with the verbal productivity variables. although less pronounced. especially as treatment progresses. F. it would be important to evaluate whether the silences exhibited by dismissing clients are reflective or perhaps disengaged.g. The difference that had been expected for internal narrative process could not be evaluated because of low coding reliability for this mode.g. p. the relevance of the NPCS to future studies on in-session narrative correlates of attachment states of mind has to be evaluated in the light of the considerable resources required to code a substantial number of therapy sessions from each dyad in a larger sample than the one used here. whereas. secure clients would be expected to show more productive and fewer obstructive silences than dismissing clients. verbal productivity. and does not easily lend itself to large-size studies. Furthermore. speak less and with shorter speaking turns. This seemed to be the case in CBT.508 Even if the variables studied here do not affect treatment outcome. Conversely. which would suggest defensiveness. leaving no room for reflection. If preoccupied clients show more initiative. the NPCS is labour intensive. where larger proportions of internal process have been reported (Levitt & Angus. However. they generate less information on their experience. secure clients should be included for comparison. The finding that a dismissing state of mind was associated with more and an increasing number of pauses across the 6 months of therapy deserves further investigation. angry. emotional. However. 18.. Daniel ate whether they are more similar to dismissing or preoccupied clients in terms of overall number of pauses. the distribution of narrative process modes varied just as much from session to session within dyads as it did between dyads. since neither PPT nor CBT have the same explicit focus on the detailed description and differentiation of feeling states that is found in process–experiential psychotherapy. most of the external process did not focus on the eating disorder. With regards to the relative predominance of the external and reflexive narrative process modes. PPT. but they may be at risk of overwhelming therapists and may leave little room for reflection. This might be related to the therapy forms. confused. Generally. which indicates that sampling just a few sessions from each dyad would be likely to misrepresent the narrative process. In the present study. 588) argued that dismissing clients are likely to make therapists feel ‘caught in the same barren landscape as the patient’ and ‘utterly shut out’. In. the coding of narrative process modes generated results that related more clearly to therapy type differences than to attachment states of mind. which only require transcription of sessions to be computed. which was also very rare in the material. speak more and for longer periods. 2000) and non-verbal emotion expression. Ltd. 1999).. On the other hand. The results of the present study suggest that it would be relevant to investigate whether therapist reactions to clients with different attachment states of mind are mediated by client in-session discourse style. they may still affect therapist reactions to clients. If dismissing clients show less initiative. Thus. including both simple use of emotion words such as that captured by computerized dictionaries (Buchheim & Mergenthaler. whereas. Even though the difference detected in terms of narrative initiative is theoretically interesting. whereas. preoccupied clients would focus more on the reflexive mode relating to inner or psychological realities. I. however.. This might be done using instruments such as the Pausing Inventory Categorization System.

G. Bruner. Bucci. attachment states of mind are evaluated based on a composite of different discourse markers. B. including the AAI proper.M. Separation. Bakermans Kranenburg.H.H. Attachment and loss: Vol. Unpublished manuscript. neutral conversations and different kinds of psychotherapy. Cambridge. 18.). & Clin. London: Pimlico. In J. London: Pimlico. A.. The power of the narrative: A multiple code account.. L. linguists. and non-experts. H. Stig Poulsen. & van Ijzendoorn.. investigations of the specificity. it requires more statistical power to detect an interaction effect than to detect main effects. (1986). C. Loss.). ed.. Bowlby.. (1996). The concept of coherence in attachment interviews: Comparing attachment experts. Such investigations might utilize an instrument such as the recently developed Coherence Q-sort (Beijersbergen. 2008). K. This kind of process seemed equally predominant with dismissing and preoccupied clients.. Bakeman. Developmental Psychology.. More elaborate and detailed information on the ‘linguistic fingerprints’ of attachment states of mind Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. but the estimated coefficients of the interaction term were also small for most variables. & Hardtke. Bakermans Kranenburg.T. and research (pp. J. CA: Sage Publications. D. T. most of the differences between dismissing and preoccupied clients identified in this study were similar in both therapies. coherence and emotional valence of the in-session autobiographical memory narratives might very well reveal differences. possible worlds. On the other hand. (2006). Psychol.. Beijersbergen. sessions from two relatively different therapy forms were investigated. & Kraemer.. Walsh. L. In spite of the marked difference between the relationship-focused PPT and the symptom-focused CBT. Bakermans Kranenburg. other characteristics may be more general discourse traits that are also related to specific attachment histories. (1973/1998). Levitt. Steer. Attachment and Human Development. J..E.A. 3. even when the therapy dialogue does not directly address attachment. 1. 87–101). MA: Harvard University Press. 29(5). In the AAI. and in this case.Attachment and Narrative Process in Therapy of episodes from the client’s life. Attachment and loss: Vol. A multicenter comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. Actual minds.5). Main et al. 353–369. The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy: Practice. M.. London: Pimlico..T. (1993). perhaps including a consideration of the content of the therapeutic dialogue rather than focusing only on narrative modes. J. H.K. Thousand Oaks. J. Angus. 2. Fairburn.. Archives of General Psychiatry. The topic is worthy of further investigation. Bowlby. and the rest of the Bulimia Trial research team. 509 in different contexts would contribute importantly to our understanding of attachment states of mind and their psychotherapeutic implications. & Brown. the lack of Client Attachment × Therapy Type interaction effects in this study may also be related to the particular choice of dependent variables. R. & Gottman. 459–466. & Rotondi-Trevisan. North York. (2007). the difference between client attachment states of mind was larger in CBT than in PPT. M. preoccupied anger). Emotion. 870–879. General Sequential Querier for Windows (Version 4. McLeod (Eds. (1997). applying a detailed level of discourse analysis across a range of discourse contexts.D. R. K. Obviously. San Antonio. often involving relational experiences. Beck Depression Inventory—Second edition Manual. 57(5). 2006).. but are expressed in a wider range of contexts (e.S. theory. Angus & J. (1969/1997).. Bakeman. some of the markers relied upon in AAI classification depend more narrowly on activation of the attachment behavioural system (e. 1255–1270. Bruner.. W. Thus. (1996). A special thank you to Lynne Angus and the dedicated NPCS coders. Since client attachment states of mind might be expressed more clearly in therapies that focus on attachment relationships. 1975. V.g. Attachment. In L.. W. R. which is based on the Gricean maxims incorporated in the AAI coding system (Grice. Cambridge. Training Manual. Angus.C.G. (2004). Ltd.J.. Department of Psychology. verbosity). Acts of meaning. L. Lewin. Perhaps. M. whereas. & Levitt. (1980/1998). Wilson. The only variable for which a Client Attachment × Therapy Type interaction effect was noted was the relative proportion of external (versus reflexive) process in sessions.1.J. 498–511 (2011) . Pennebaker (Ed. Psychother. Canada. REFERENCES Agras. Beck.. Hardtke. As already mentioned.g. York University. (1990). New York: Cambridge University Press. Inc. Angus. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank Susanne Lunn. disclosure. TX: The Psychological Corporation. The results of the present study suggest that the different insecure attachment states of mind may not be differentiated by distinct in-session narrative process at the relatively broad level picked of by the coding for NPCS narrative process modes. Bouffard. Narrative Processes Coding System. (1999).). A psychometric study of the Adult Attachment Interview: Reliability and discriminant validity. M. 55(10). W. The Narrative Processes Coding System: Research applications and implications for psychotherapy practice. it may be that engagement in psychotherapy inherently activates the attachment behavioural system. & Van Ijzendoorn. G. (1995). H. J. Attachment and loss: Vol. 8(4).. Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd. future studies should utilize more fine-grained discourse analysis. M. Journal of Clinical Psychology. ‘What’s the story?’ Working with narrative in experiential psychotherapy. Ontario. J. Bowlby. MA: Harvard University Press. (2000). & Quera.. & van Ijzendoorn. nevertheless. J.

S. O. In H. Leigh. M. (1998). (2004). (2006). 2584–2599. Reynoso. K. B. Murray.). (2008). research. Fairburn. Clin. Cognitive behaviour therapy versus psychoanalytic psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa—A randomised. Adam. (1996). The search for the secure base. & Mergenthaler. Psychotherapy process measure research and the evaluation of psychotherapy orientation: A narrative analysis. research. Cartwright. M.E. P. A. Holmes.S. Muir (Eds... NJ. The relevance of attachment research for adult narratives told in psychotherapy. K. Attachment organization and treatment use for adults with serious psychopathological disorders. L. 43–52. P. Assessing silent processes in psychotherapy: An empirically derived categorization system and sampling strategy. Child Development. Hesse. (2008).. Psychotherapeutic issues on eating disorders: Models. 26(8). Steele & M. E.M. and clinical applications (pp. (2006). In J. Treboux. S. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. (1996). Steele. Change in attachment patterns and reflective function in a randomized control trial of transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder.. 1027–1040. Clinical applications of the Adult Attachment Interview (pp. and narrative style: A computer-based text analysis of the Adult Attachment Interview. 49–66).B. M. 139–153).A. M. Adult attachment patterns and individual psychotherapy: A review. New York: Guilford Press. R.I. 67(5). Unpublished manuscript. Unpublished thesis.R. 47–60. (2005). H. emotion-abstraction patterns. 18. M. Adult attachment: Implications for the therapeutic process in a home visitation intervention. E.. Greenberg.).. Attachment state of mind and the treatment relationship. Lomax. O’Connor. 3(1). C. Fish.E.. London: Oxford University Press. Speech acts (pp. Clinical Applications of the Adult Attachment Interview (pp. D. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology. (2002). Steele..L.L. I.. & Main. & Bakermans Kranenburg. Kennedy. Syntax and semantics. Daniel. The relationship among attachment representation.. Daniel Frankel.I. Ltd. & Egeland. Leigh. 46(3). J. J.D. Psychother. 968–984. Feldstein. 41–58). 10(4). Dozier. O. The challenge of treatment for clients with dismissing states of mind. Psychotherapy Research.. R. Bria & A. Practice. Adult Attachment Interview (3rd ed. S. M. Mattoon. Steele.. Inc. Morgan (Eds.H.. 74(6). & Lee.510 health (pp. Clarkin.. M. (1975). 390– 407.).A. B. Rome: Societa Editrice Universo. Research. 62–76. S. Buchheim. 64(1). Rhythms of dialogue in infancy: Coordinated timing in development. Cassidy & P. Dozier. vi–131.C. (2004).. (1999). H. M. 22–31.R.. J. the reflective self. J. University of Copenhagen..F. & Albus. 497–519). K. J. L.L. J. Defensive and creative uses of narrative in psychotherapy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. A comparative analysis of the Narrative Process Coding System and three standardized psychotherapy process measures: A multi-modal analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. C. Handbook of attachment: Theory. J. (1991). Attachment and psychopathology in adulthood. New York: Other Press. Roberts & J. In H. Crown. G. (2001).). [Psychoanalytic psychotherapy for bulimia—A treatment manual]. & Target.S. S. Beebe.)... (2006). Psychotherapy Research. (1990). Daniel. 615–625. Crowell. C. P. Holmes (Eds. C. Hillsdale. Fonagy. 395–433). G. H. The Bulimia pilot trial. In P. Steele.). New York: Guilford Press. A.. Steele (Eds. Discriminant validity of the Adult Attachment Interview. 2(1). 301–316. Department of Psychology. (2001). Levitt. Child Development.). Minneapolis.. L. Waters. S.M.. Ciocca (Eds. E. H. York University. S. Kaplan. H. M. Psykoanalytisk psykoterapi med bulimi—En behandlingsmanual. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.C.R. ColonDowns. Attachment and eating disorders. Fonagy.. Jaffe. Development and Psychopathology. J. and borderline states: The predictive specificity of the Adult Attachment Interview and pathological emotional development. M. K. Training.N. (1995). Canada.). (1999).. M. & Gerber. New York: Academic Press..F. scoring and procedures manual (3rd ed. & Scherer. In J. Publishers. Psychol. New York: Guilford Press.... & Bates. 93–122). 27(1). 69–98). methods. The relation of attachment status. Affect regulation.). and the development of the self. Meehan. Applied Developmental Science. The adult attachment interview: Historical and current perspectives. & Dudas. psychiatric classification. University of California at Berkeley... Korfmacher. mentalization. In G. Levitt.. 373–384. SCL-90-R: Administration. K.. C. C. Mattoon. Department of Psychology. Unpublished manuscript. Steele (Eds.. A. In L. (1997). & Poulsen. (1999). Interactional synchrony and the origins of infant-mother attachment: A replication study.S. Attachment and Human Development. Fonagy. M. (1994). observerblinded clinical trial. 167–180).J. Unpublished manuscript.M.. Gergely. S. The distribution of adult attachment representations in clinical groups: A meta-analytic search for patterns of attachment in 105 AAI studies.. The AAI anticipates the outcome of a relation-based early intervention.). In P. MN: National Computer Systems. Kelly. E. George.. 279–300. Vocal indicators of mood change in depression. F. London: Brunner Routledge. M. Shaver (Eds. G. In S. (2001). H. & Poulsen. C. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Attachment theory and psychotherapy. (2003)..... (2008). Holmes.0). and clinical perspectives (pp. England: Analytic Press.. Stovall. New York: Guilford Press. 83–110. 66(2). Shaver (Eds. Z. and results (pp. Isabella. 99–125). Handbook of attachment: Theory. Levy.F. L. Derogatis.. Target. B. Dozier.. & Angus. Logic and conversation. (2000). Clinical Social Work Journal. D. Ellgring. Goldberg & R. Heinicke. The developmental roots of narrative expression in therapy: Contributions from attachment theory and research.R. Candelori. 27–40. Attachment. Attachment theory: Social. 498–511 (2011) . T..C. 62(2).. 1(1). Healing stories: Narrative in psychiatry and psychotherapy (pp.. & Ciocca. & Levine. Lunn. Dozier. Levitt. Goldberg (Eds. Steele & M. L. Cassidy & P. (1996).). Atkinson & S. Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. & Jasnow.. S. R. Tyrell.P... & Belsky.. Ogawa. M. & Kernberg.. Volume 3. N.F. and clinical applications (pp. Attachment issues in psychopathology and intervention (pp. E. New York: Guilford Press. Grice. 20(2). L. J. Weber.. (1996).. K. (1999).M. Kennedy. (1999). van Ijzendoorn. developmental. 9(3). A. Cole & J. & Angus. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. Psychotherapy: Theory. Lunn.W. (2009).. T. H. and response to psychotherapy. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. Jurist. K. Code-A-Text Integrated System for the Analysis of Interviews and Dialogues (Version 3.6. (1993). M. 233–278). & Target. B. E. & Feider. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior.. 16(5)..

. Stability and discriminant validity of the Adult Attachment Interview: A psychometric study in young Israeli adults..M.M. van IJzendoorn. Guilbaud. E. & Pallanti. New York: Guilford Press. (1995). Toth. New York: Guilford Press. 154–174). & Treasure. C.. Psychoanalytic Psychology. P. Department of Psychology. Developmental Psychology. and attachment: Working models of interpersonal affect and the socialization of emotion.L. Corcos. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Rabe-Hesketh. (2008). In S... Depressive personality dimensions and alexithymia in eating disorders. M. & Jeammet..C. Personality disorder and the mental representation of early social experience. Effective treatment relationships for persons with serious psychiatric disorders: The importance of attachment states of mind. Mancone. In H. C.. Attachment theory and research in clinical work with adults. Attachment in anorexia nervosa: A transgenerational perspective. C.. (2000). Hillsdale.H. A... and adult attachment: Flexible vs. Parish. M.R. Clinical Applications of the Adult Attachment Interview (pp. M. M.A. M. Inc.. Vismara. Ward. 30(5). New York: Guilford Press. & Goldwyn. Shaver (Eds. Bizouard. C.. (2003).L.M..N. British Journal of Medical Psychology. research.B. M. (1989). In H. (2005). A. (2006). B. New York: Guilford Press. Flament. R.1. C. E. Goldberg & R. Ramsay. (2007). (2007). New York: Guilford Press. & Eagle.W. 271–286.. Gibbon. D. Schuengel. & Maughan. Zegers. S. (1999). Castle.H. Washington. (1999). and clinical applications (pp. Psychotherapy Research... child. L.. dynamics.. 31–68). Speranza. Shaver (Eds.. J. R.Z. & Cicchetti. The development of emotion expression during the first 2 years of life.R.P. Attachment theory and research: Implications for the theory and practice of individual psychotherapy with adults. (2008). Rogosch....L. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. S. Cassidy & P. P. M. M. M. & Bucci. R. Scharf. Turnbull. 787–802). M. 2(2). New York: Guilford Press. (2009). Structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II). 125–142. and clinical applications (pp. & Shaver.. Ltd.. Psychol. Attachmenttheory-informed intervention and reflective functioning in depressed mothers. 67(5)..L. 54(1–2).). Psychiatry Research. Perez Diaz. P. S. D. 126– 153). 6. Malatesta. C. 18.. College Station. Sagi.R. 6(2).. W. Wallin. M. D.B. New York: The Guilford Press. Pazzagli.. F. 72(3). (2006). Steele (Eds.). University of Copenhagen. 497–505. Sandros. 407–474). Culver.). A. J. A. and developmental outcomes in an African American sample.. R.. In J. In H. (2001). British Journal of Medical Psychology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.. M. 76(3).H.. The organized categories of infant.. Attachment in Psychotherapy. Recent studies in attachment: Overview. O..J. Stephan.. W. Spitzer. & Koren-Karie. M. Main. Hobson. DC: American Psychiatric Press.. A. Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. (2001).. 375–388. Steele & M. 1–104. M. R. (1994).Attachment and Narrative Process in Therapy University Clinic. (2008). Main. & Berant. Department of Psychology. with selected implications for clinical work.. (2002). Norcross. Handbook of attachment: Theory. NJ: Analytic Press. Unpublished PhD thesis. Muir (Eds. inflexible attention under attachment-related stress. E. 575–594). Mergenthaler.. Linking verbal and nonverbal representations: Computer analysis of referential activity. M. & Shepard. Version 7. Psychotherapy transcription standards.H.. (1999). A. van Ijzendoorn. Attachment patterns among young women diagnosed with bulimia nervosa and their mothers. Cassidy & P.. R. Candelaria. J.). J..A. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. M. 135(2). Affect. Clin. Adult attachment. M. 166–170.. Venisse.). Sorbello. Department of Psychology. Clinical applications of the Adult Attachment Interview (pp. C.. research. Steele & M. (1992). & Fallot. Mikulincer. (1994). Hesse. 153–163. 725–733.. New York: Oxford University Press. & Janssens. University of California at Berkeley. Steele (Eds. Attachment in adulthood: Structure. (2008). Patrick. 74(4)...). Clinical Applications of the Adult Attachment Interview (pp. Obegi. E.. Slade. Steele. Mergenthaler. M. J. In J. A. Teti.B.M. R. D. New York: Guilford Press. 511 Ramacciotti. & First. O. H. Main. N.. Adult Attachment Scoring and Classification Systems. Steele (Eds. M. Magai. F. Loas. Handbook of attachment: Theory.).A. Steele & M. imagery. C. R. (2002). and change. M. G. Psychother.). Killeen. E. Halfon. L. Howard. (1999). 1055–1096. 20(2). Goldwyn. 325–334 Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. (1990). B. G. Studying differences in language usage in recounting attachment history: An introduction to the AAI. Development and Psychopathology. R D. Tyrrell. Steele. M. & Hesse. S. parental commitment to early intervention.. Unpublished manuscript. 498–511 (2011) . TX: Stata Press. Williams. Attachment to the therapist.. Attachment theory: Social. J. 771–777. M. J. & Skrondal. Teague. 48(4). Miller.. Attachment processes in eating disorders. Hess. University of Copenhagen.A. 339–354. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (2nd ed. and clinical perspectives (pp. (Eds. developmental.. & O’Connell. Tesman. Main.. Attachment representations of institutionalized dolescents and their professional caregivers: Predicting the development of therapeutic relationships. & Stinson.. Dozier. P. Eating and Weight Disorders..

and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission.Copyright of Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy is the property of John Wiley & Sons. Inc. However. users may print. . or email articles for individual use. download.