Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • Laureano vs. CA

    Hochgeladen von

    Na-eehs Noicpecnoc Namzug
    106 Ansichten1 Seite
    1) Menandro Laureano was hired as a pilot by Singapore Airlines and his first term was extended for another 5 years. 2) However, Singapore Airlines initiated cost-cutting measures due to recession and advised Laureano to take leave, then decided to terminate excess personnel including Laureano. 3) Laureano filed a case for illegal dismissal before the labor arbiter, then withdrew the complaint and filed a case for damages due to illegal termination before the court. 4) Singapore Airlines filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that Philippine courts have no jurisdiction over the case. The court denied the motion, holding that it cannot be determined if the termination was legal under Singapore law as defendant failed to cite the

    Originalbeschreibung:

    jurisdiction, conflict of laws,

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Verfügbare Formate

    DOC, PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    1) Menandro Laureano was hired as a pilot by Singapore Airlines and his first term was extended for another 5 years. 2) However, Singapore Airlines initiated cost-cutting measures due to recession and advised Laureano to take leave, then decided to terminate excess personnel including Laureano. 3) Laureano filed a case for illegal dismissal before the labor arbiter, then withdrew the complaint and filed a case for damages due to illegal termination before the court. 4) Singapore Airlines filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that Philippine courts have no jurisdiction over the case. The court denied the motion, holding that it cannot be determined if the termination was legal under Singapore law as defendant failed to cite the

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    106 Ansichten1 Seite

    Laureano vs. CA

    Hochgeladen von

    Na-eehs Noicpecnoc Namzug
    1) Menandro Laureano was hired as a pilot by Singapore Airlines and his first term was extended for another 5 years. 2) However, Singapore Airlines initiated cost-cutting measures due to recession and advised Laureano to take leave, then decided to terminate excess personnel including Laureano. 3) Laureano filed a case for illegal dismissal before the labor arbiter, then withdrew the complaint and filed a case for damages due to illegal termination before the court. 4) Singapore Airlines filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that Philippine courts have no jurisdiction over the case. The court denied the motion, holding that it cannot be determined if the termination was legal under Singapore law as defendant failed to cite the

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 1

    GR NO. 114776 Menandro B. Laureano vs. Court of Appeals Facts: o!et"!

    e on 1#7$% Meandro Laureano &as '"red () "n*apore A"rl"nes l"!"ted as p"lot+e,patr"ate B-7.7 Capta"n/. 0"s f"rst ter! &as t'en e,tended for anot'er 1 )ears. 0o&ever% defendant "n*apore A"rl"nes l"!"ted &as '"t () recess"on and "n"t"ated a costcutt"n* !easure. 2al"nt"ff &as adv"sed to to ta3e a leave (ut t'en defendant dec"ded to ter!"nate "ts e,cess personnel "nclud"n* pla"nt"ff. u(se4uentl)% pla"nt"ff "nst"tuted a case for "lle*al d"s!"ssal (efore t'e la(or ar("ter. 5efendant !oved to d"s!"ss t'e case. Before t'e !ot"on &as resolved% t'e co!pla"nt &as &"t'dra&n and pla"nt"ff f"led a case for da!a*es due to "lle*al ter!"nat"on of contract of serv"ces (efore t'e court a 4uo. "n*apore A"rl"nes l"!"ted f"led a !ot"on to d"s!"ss on t'e *round t'at t'e court 'as no 6ur"sd"ct"on over t'e su(6ect !atter of t'e case and t'at 2'"l"pp"ne courts 'ave no 6ur"sd"ct"on over t'e "nstant case. 7ssue: 8'et'er or no t'e 2'"l"pp"ne court 'as 6ur"sd"ct"on over t'e case Rul"n*: 9es. :'e court 'eld t'at "t cannot (e deter!"ned &'et'er t'e ter!"nat"on of t'e pla"nt"ff "s le*al under t'e "n*aporean la&s (ecause defendant fa"led to s'o& &'"c' spec"f"c la&s of "n*apore appl"es to t'"s case. :'e defendant t'at cla"!s t'e appl"ca("l"t) of t'e "n*aporean la&s to t'"s case 'as t'e (urden of proof. :'e court furt'er 'eld t'at t'e Court of Appeals ac4u"red 6ur"sd"ct"on &'en defendant f"led "ts appeal (efore t'e sa"d court.

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen