Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A basic guide to the concepts, techniques and strategies of oral history research
Parts I and II
C. Forms
Interview data sheet
Legal Release form
D. Archiving
Storage
Accessioning
Transcription
Verbatim vs. edited transcripts
IV. Conclusion
V. Acknowledgements
VI. Basic References
VII. Archives in Virginia & Vicinity
VIII. Sample Forms
2) Legal Release form: a standard legal procedure, obtaining a signed release form
clarifies the conditions under which the interview is made, and gives formal permission
for tapes to be put on deposit in archive.
The release form functions 1) as protection against legal liability; 2) and as a contract
defining your use of the materials; and 3) as a contract protecting the interests of your
informants. If you publish an article, for example, and quote an informant saying
something he/she later decides is libelous or damaging, the release form is your legal
protection against litigation. Lawsuits are very unlikely, but by signing a release form,
your informants also give permission for you to deposit your collection of tapes,
transcripts, and photos in an archive, to make the materials available to public and
scholarly uses, and to use the materials in publications. Release forms may also include
restrictions protecting the interests of your informants, by forbidding public access until a
specified date, for instance, if your informant requires such restriction as a condition of
giving the interview. Always obtain a release form, signed by interviewer & interviewee,
at the end of the interview.
Release forms typically stipulate conditions of access to materials (giving either complete
or restricted access to tapes and/or transcripts), conditions under which the information
can be released, and intended uses of the materials. Allowances are often made for the
interviewee to add other restrictions (e.g., to be available only after death). Most peole
are willing to sign without special conditions.
Sample release forms, with varying degrees of restriction, may be found in Edward Ives's
The Tape-Recorded Interview, and many other oral history guides. A few examples are
appended to this document.
III.D. Archiving, Transcription, and Accessioning
Archiving: Archiving must be planned in advance! Tape recordings are subject to
relatively quick deterioration due to heat and humidity, and the limited longevity of the
magnetic tapes themselves. None of us have proper storage facilities in our homes. Ideal
storage facilities have a controlled environment: constant temperature of 70 degrees, & a
humidity level of 50%.
Some collectors of oral history and folklore hoard their tape recordings away in a
shoebox in a closet, where the tapes deteriorate, until virtually useless; What a waste!
Your collection, if it's to be of any value to anyone but yourself, should be deposited as
soon as possible with a properly equipped and staffed facility (a library, or the archive of
a university, organization, or national repsitory) -- even if you do so on the condition that
no one has access without your permission, or until after your death. Some archives, like
the Archive of Folk Culture at the Library of Congress, will even provide you with the
tapes to make copies of your collection, if you will agree to deposit your originals with
them.
Donating tapes to a library, museum, or archive with the proper facilities will ensure their
being preserved for the future -- if the organization will dedicate the staff, time, and
expertise to caring for the collection. The organization you select should also have the
means of making your collection accessible to the public -- that is, by accessioning your
collection into their catalog of materials, and the staff to oversee the proper use of the
matterials.
Most state universities have special collection divisions that will happily acommodate a
significant and well-organized collection. (Appended to this document is a list of
recommended archival facilities in Virginia and its vicinity.) Copies of the collection can
often be kept at libraries or other institutions in the locality where the collection was
made, as an educational resource for the immediate community.
Accessioning: Accessioning involves keeping track of collected materials by creating a
master index. This can quickly become overwhelming if not systematically planned, and
kept up to date.
1) Label tapes in the field as recorded: name of interviewee, date of interview, number of
cassette.
2) When tapes & data sheets are turned in, assign an accession number: sequential, or
coded according to date, topic, informant & number of tapes in session (e.g. 6/89-12-1).
3) Record the accession number on the tape cassette, on data sheets, release forms, and in
a master index.
Efficient accessioning facilitates organization, quick access, and retrieval. Otherwise, all
you have is a useless mess.
Transcription: Transcription is the process of taking the spoken word and putting it into
written form. Oral history info is useful only if accessible. Access to info much easier in
printed form than on cassette, though tapes themselve remain a primary document & a
valuable historical object in themselves.
But transcription is also the most difficult, dreaded, and least enjoyed aspect of fieldwork.
It is slow, painstaking work, requiring 4-10 hours for each hour of tape, which may
amount to as much as 40-50 pages. A Transcriber/Dictaphone is very helpful; these tape-
players have foot pedal for forward and reverse, which frees the typists hands from the
annoyance of punching buttons on a standard tape machine.
Though sometimes impractical, it's often good for interviewers to transcribe their own
tapes: this provides feedback on one's effectiveness as interviewer; and it suggests
follow-up questions. (But both of these can also be done in a simple review of tapes).
Interviewers are also the ones best able to decipher indistinct words and passages.
If the transcriber is not the interviewer, then the interviewer should at least review tape
and provide an outline of topics. If the entire tape is not being transcribed, the interviewer
should specify which parts to transcribe verbatim, which to summarize, and which to
merely index.
The intervewer should also review & correct the transcripts, deciphering words or
passages the typist couldn't understand.
Verbatim vs. edited transcript: Resolution of this issue depends on objectives of your
project. The general standard is HONESTY -- you cannot change the intent of a person's
statement, or put words in their mouth. Researchers are ethically obliged to strive for
ACCURACY without distortion, even if not for verbatim transcription.
In any case, doing verbatim transcription does not mean typing out every `uh' & `ah', nor
even false starts. But it is misrepresentation to edit much, or to correct grammar.
Faithfulness to speaking style may be significant to later researchers.
If you intend to develop an exhibit or publication drawing on your oral history research,
verbatim individual statements may provide just the right flavor as a direct quotation to
accompany artifact or photo; at other times, general info digested from several statements
by different people may be best used in paraphrase. But unless you know exactly which
passages are to be used how, this is an impossible question to decide beforehand.
IV. Conclusion
As Edward Ives observed, oral history is not "instant history." To do it right is hard, time-
consuming work.
But with it you can get info not obtainable in other ways. Oral histories add value and
interest to conventional historical research by putting flesh on the bones of fact. If done
properly, oral histories provide future generations of students and researchers with
invaluable primary resources of information that would have otherwise have been lost.
V. Acknowledgements
This workshop draws heavily on Sitton, et al., Oral History: A Guide for Teachers and
Others, and on Edward Ives book, The Tape Recorded Interview, and his videotape "An
Oral Historian's Work.". Readers are urged to consult these more authoritative and
comprehensive works, as well as the following resources
VI. Basic References
"An Oral Historian's Work." (Orono, Maine: Northeast Archives of Folklore and Oral
History, 1987). [videotape]
Golden Days: An Oral History Guide, Dr. Richard Blaustein (Johnson City. TN: East
Tennessee State University Center for Appalachian Studies)
Oral History, James Hoopes. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1979).
Oral History: A Guide for Teachers and Others, Thad Sitton, Geo. L. Mehaffy, O.L. Davis
(Austin: Univ of Texas Press, 1983).
Oral History: From Tape to Type, Cullom Davis, Kathryn Back, Kay MacLean (Chicago:
American Library Association, 1977).
People Studying People: The Human Element in Fieldwork, Robert A. Georges and
Michael Owen Jones (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980).
The Tape-Recorded Interview: A Manual for Fieldworkers in Folklore and Oral History,
Edward D. Ives (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1977).
VII. Recommended Archives In Virginia & Vicinity
The Virginia State Library and Archives
11th Street at Capitol Square
Richmond, VA 23219-3491
434/786-2332
Alderman Library
Special Collections/Manuscripts
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434/924-3025
The Newman Library
Special Collections Dept.
Virginia Polytechnic Institue and State University
Blacksburg, VA 24061-1434
703/231-6308
Southern Historical Collection
Manuscripts Department
CB # 3926, Wilson Library
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3926
919/962-1345
East Tennessee State University
Archive of Appalachia
Center for Appalachian Studies and Services
Box 70556
Johnson City, TN 37614-0556
615/929-5348