1he decade LhaL began wlLh Lhe SovleL lnLervenLlon ln AfghanlsLan ended wlLh LhaL emplre chooslng Lo volunLarlly go ouL of buslness and dlsmanLle Lhelr LerrlLorlal auLhorlLles" (SylvesLer, 2001: 7). 1hls was an occaslon LhaL Lhe purveyors of Lhe reallsL paradlgm noL only falled Lo predlcL, buL would have argued was fundamenLally lmposslble, emplres do noL volunLarlly rellnqulsh power, noL wlLhouL a flghL. 1he elghLles conLalned oLher challenges Lo LradlLlonal lnLernaLlonal relaLlons and securlLy as well, among Lhem 8lchard ullman's '8edeflnlng SecurlLy' ln 1981, whlch argued for movlng away from Lhe sLaLe and mlllLary as Lhe sole referenLs ln l8 research and LhoughL. 1haL Lhe world of l8 seemed ready Lo do so could be polnLed Lo by Lhe facL LhaL ullman's arLlcle was publlshed ln a LradlLlonally reallsL [ournal, !"#$%"&#'("&) +$,-%'#.. Cf all Lhe crlLlques of lnLernaLlonal relaLlons Lo appear ln Lhls decade and lnLo Lhe nexL, one LhaL conLlnues Lo 'broaden and deepen' are femlnlsL and gender approaches Lo lnLernaLlonal relaLlons. ln assesslng how femlnlsm 'Lroubles' lnLernaLlonal relaLlons, glven LhaL femlnlsm ls a broad church, and noL consLlLuLlve of a slngle, monollLhlc approach, lL ls useful Lo make use of several frameworks wlLh whlch Lo proceed. lemlnlsL approaches Lo lnLernaLlonal relaLlons can flrsLly be Lhough of as asklng (l) whaL are Lhe effecLs of mascullne blas?, (ll) where are Lhe women?, and (lll) how should l8 Lheory be deconsLrucLed and reconsLrucLed (eLerson, 2004: 37-38)? AnoLher framework ls Lo look aL Lhe 'key poslLlons' of femlnlsLs, broken down lnLo (l) llberal, (ll) sLandpolnL, and (lll) posLsLrucLural femlnlsms (eoples & vaughan-Wllllams, 2010: 36). LasLly, lL ls useful and lnsLrucLlve Lo Lhlnk abouL femlnlsL approaches Lo lnLernaLlonal relaLlons ln Lerms of (l) emplrlcal femlnlsm, (ll) analyLlcal femlnlsm, and (lll) normaLlve femlnlsm (1rue, 2009). 8y examlnlng Lhese vlewpolnLs, sLandpolnLs, and approaches, we can slghL, slghL and clLe women ln a fleld LradlLlonally domlnaLed by mascullne gender and men, and reveal how femlnlsm Lroubles lnLernaLlonal relaLlons.
ln whaL femlnlsL l8 LheorlsL v. Splke eLerson calls Lhe lnlLlal femlnlsL pro[ecL", work has been done Lo deLall Lhe exLenL Lo whlch women have been lefL ouL of pollLlcal narraLlves, and also how 'woman' ls presenLed as belng 'less' or somehow devlanL from a 'male' ldeal. As eLerson poslLs,
lrom wlLhln l8 for example, Lhe assumed model of 'human naLure' (as aLomlsLlc, self-servlng, acqulslLlve, compeLlLlve) ls ln facL based upon a parLlcular subseL of humans (ellLe males) ln a parLlcular hlsLorlcal conLexL (modern Lurope). 1hese are noL unlversal caLegorles or condlLlons and are Lherefore susplclous as unlversallzlng clalms abouL all humans - or even all males - aL all Llmes (eLerson, 2004: 37)
1hls 'lnlLlal pro[ecL', followlng on Lhls loglc, also assalls Lhe 'mascullnlsL consLrucLs' wlLh whlch Lhese predomlnanLly whlLe, Luropean (even ellLe Amerlcan men are of Luropean herlLage) l8 LheorlsLs are engaged: lL ls a dlsclpllne focused on publlc sphere acLlvlLles (power pollLlcs, forelgn pollcy, war) LhaL are deflned as mascullne and domlnaLed by men" (eLerson, 2004: 37). Carol Cohn's 'Sex and ueaLh ln Lhe 8aLlonal World of uefense lnLellecLuals' deLalls her lnLernshlp ln Lhe world of SLraLeglc Alr Command sLraLeglsLs, whlch she characLerlzes as whlLe men ln Lles dlscusslng mlsslle slze, a world LhaL ls nearly enLlrely male excepL for secreLarles. Cohn exposes Lhe elaboraLe use of absLracLlon and euphemlsm" ln whlch Lhese men use sanlLlzed language Lo dlscuss nuclear war, Lerms llke 'clean bombs', 'collaLeral damage', and 'counLervalue aLLacks', whlch lmply clvlllan casualLles ln Lhe Lens of mllllons, buL never sLaLe such wlLh expllclLy (Cohn, 1987: 691-692). Cohn goes on Lo deLall Lhe 'sexual subLexL' of Lhe work of nuclear sLraLeglsLs, wlLh Lhelr 'peneLraLlon alds', Lhe exLenL Lo whlch Lhese sLraLeglsLs llnk dlsarmamenL wlLh emasculaLlon, and proposals for releaslng 70 Lo 80 percenL of our megaLonnage ln one orgasmlc whump", because Lhe 8usslans are a llLLle harder Lhan we are" (Cohn, 1987: 693). She goes on Lo demonsLraLe how [olnlng Lhe world's nuclear club ls referred Lo as loslng one's vlrglnlLy, how 'domesLlc' language ('sllos', 'ChrlsLmas Lree farms', 'Lake ouL', 'marry up') ls employed, how Cppenhelmer's deadly baby ls consldered Lhe producL of a male havlng glven blrLh, and how Lhe excluslvely male lmage of Lhe blbllcal '1rlnlLy' are used Lo gender Lhe world of nuclear weapons (Cohn, 1987: 696-702). As a resulL of Lhe Llme she spenL ln Lhls world, Cohn asserLs she began Lo feel LhaL l had fallen down Lhe rabblL hole - and lL was a sLruggle Lo cllmb back ouL", noL Lhe leasL of whlch because, as a resulL of havlng been lmmersed ln Lhe mad Lea parLy of 'raLlonal' whlLe men ln Lles calmly and cllnlcally dlscusslng Lhe desLrucLlon of llfe on earLh, LhaL she, Loo, began Lo belleve slx lmposslble Lhlngs before breakfasL" (Cohn, 1987: 713). Cohn concludes LhaL deconsLrucLlng sLraLeglc dlscourse's clalms Lo raLlonallLy ls, Lhen, ln and of lLself, an lmporLanL way Lo challenge lLs hegemony as Lhe sole leglLlmaLe language for publlc debaLe abouL nuclear pollcy" (Cohn, 1987: 717). Cohn's savvy and success ln dlssecLlng mascullnlsL blas ln Lhe world of nuclear sLraLeglsLs runs counLer Lo some of Lhe clalms made by whlLe men ln Lles wlLh mlsslle envy. uonald 8egan, resldenL 8eagan's WhlLe Pouse Chlef of SLaff, for example, clalmed LhaL women are noL golng Lo undersLand [mlsslle] Lhrow welghLs or whaL ls happenlng ln human rlghLs. some women wlll, buL mosL women would raLher read Lhe human lnLeresL sLuff" (1lckner, 1992: 2). 1hus, femlnlsL l8 LheorlsLs reveal how women and anyLhlng havlng a consLrucL of 'femlnlnlLy' (whlch lncludes non-ellLe men and culLures) have been occulLed and occluded due Lo belng porLrayed as Lhe 'CLher' and noL worLhy of Lhe sLudy LhaL men and mascullnlzed acLlvlLles should be.
1he nexL femlnlsL pro[ecL asks Where are Lhe women?", and seeks Lo remedy androcenLrlc formulaLlons by addlng women and Lhelr experlences Lo exlsLlng frameworks" (eLerson, 2004:37). locuslng on women's experlences ln boLh prlvaLe and publlc spheres, noL only ls more learned abouL women and Lhe fundamenLally dlfferenL ways ln whlch Lhey experlence llfe, buL more ls learned abouL men, as well. eLerson asserLs LhaL Lhls lnLegraLlon of Lhe 'maln' sLory wlLh Lhe 'background' sLory ls essenLlal ln galnlng a rlcher undersLandlng of Lhe forces and processes aL work ln lnLernaLlonal relaLlons (eLerson, 2004: 37). Pere eLerson asserLs
Maklng women emplrlcally vlslble ls lndlspensable, and ls Lhe mosL famlllar and mosL wldely accepLed femlnlsL lnLervenLlon ln l8. lL exposes Lhe androcenLrlc assumpLlons of convenLlonal accounLs, lnserLs acLual (embodled) women ln our plcLure of 'reallLy', and reveals women as agenLs and acLlvlsLs, as well as vlcLlms of vlolence and Lhe pooresL of Lhe poor. 1hese are lmporLanL and lnnovaLlve lnslghLs and Lo Lhe exLenL LhaL Lhey are noLlced aL all by Lhe malnsLream, Lhey LenL Lo be 'accepLed' as emplrlcally sound observaLlons and hence have 'leglLlmacy' wlLhln l8 (eLerson, 2004: 38)
1he lasL of femlnlsm's Lhree generallzed 'pro[ecLs' asserLed by eLerson ls LhaL of 'reconsLrucLlng Lheory'. Cne sLrand of femlnlsL l8 Lheory asserLs LhaL, whlle sex ls blologlcally bl-polar, LhaL gender ls a soclal consLrucLlon LhaL spllLs acLs, appearances and behavlors lnLo mascullne-femlnlne. 1hus, gender ls noL slmply a LralL of lndlvlduals buL an lnsLlLuLlonallzed, sLrucLural feaLure of soclal llfe" (eLerson, 2004: 39). lL regards gender as boLh an emplrlcal caLegory, and an analyLlcal caLegory, wlLh v. Splke eLerson asserLlng Lhe need for Lhe fleld Lo progresslvely move from Lhe former Lo laLLer caLegorles. ln Lhe conLexL of securlLy sLudles, lL means asklng whaL securlLy can mean ln Lhe conLexL of lnLerlocklng sysLems of hlerarchy and domlnaLlon ands how gendered ldenLlLles and ldeologles (re)produce Lhese sLrucLural lnsecurlLlLes"(eLerson, 1992: 32), as Sheehan suggesLs, ConsLlLuLlng new vlslons of securlLy ls Lherefore seen as requlrlng Lhe pollLlclzaLlon of sLrucLural vlolence as conLlngenL and noL naLural, and accepLlng LhaL lL can be changed" (Sheehan, 2003: 126). SLressed also ls Lhe ldea LhaL Lhe sLaLe ls a 'proLecLlon rackeL', LhaL offers securlLy from lnLernal and exLernal LhreaLs LhaL are of lLs own creaLlon (Sheehan, 2003: 126).
lL ls Lhls lasL 'pro[ecL', LhaL of creaLlng lLs own LheoreLlcal conLrlbuLlon, LhaL has Lhus far been mosL dlfflculL, and encounLered mosL reslsLance. Andrew !ones offers Lhe crlLlque LhaL
lemlnlsL aLLempLs Lo lncorporaLe a gender varlable lnLo l8 analysls are consLralned by Lhe baslc femlnlsL meLhodology and all femlnlsLs' normaLlve commlLmenLs. A genulnely 'femlnlsL approach' by deflnlLlon musL Lake /(0$"'s llves as Lhe eplsLemologlcal sLarLlng polnL. And a deflnlng elemenL of femlnlsL approaches. ls a soclal pro[ecL almed aL amelloraLlng women's sLrucLured lack of prlvllege and emanclpaLlng Lhem as a gender-class (!ones, 1996: 420)
ln defense, eLerson polnLs ouL LhaL all Lheory crlLlcal of Lhe domlnanL l8 Lheorles ls sub[ecL Lo marglnallzaLlon or dlsmlssal", and adds LhaL lnsofar as femlnlsL Lheorles are Lhe leasL famlllar and ralse Lhe mosL unorLhodox quesLlons, Lhey are especlally sub[ecL Lo Lhls faLe" (eLerson, 2004: 43).
A second framework for assesslng how femlnlsm Lroubles LradlLlonal l8 ls Lo apply eoples and vaughan-Wllllams' 'key poslLlons' approach, spllLLlng Lhe fleld of femlnlsL l8 lnLo llberal, sLandpolnL, and posLsLrucLural camps. 1he flrsL, LhaL of femlnlsL llberals, can be Lyplfled by CynLhla Lnloe and her lconlc 1&"&"&23 1$&,4$2 &"5 1&2$26 7&8'"9 :$0'"'2# +$"2$ (; !"#$%"&#'("&) <()'#',2, ln whlch she polnLs ouL LhaL lf we employ only Lhe convenLlonal, ungendered compass Lo charL lnLernaLlonal pollLlcs, we are llkely Lo end up mapplng a landscape peopled only by men, mosLly ellLe men. 1he real landscape of lnLernaLlonal pollLlcs ls less excluslvely male" (Lnloe, 1989: 1). 1hus, Lnloe dlssecLs Lourlsm, naLlonallsm, mlllLary bases, Lhe world of dlplomacy, banana planLaLlons, Lhe fashlon world, and Lhe world of domesLlc servanLs, looklng for Lhe unLold sLorles, and Lhus unheralded conLrlbuLlons, of women. ln keeplng wlLh Lhe sLrand of femlnlsL l8 Lheory, she asserLs LhaL, far from belng 'naLural', LhaL femlnlnlLy and mascullnlLy are packages of expecLaLlons LhaL have been creaLed Lhrough speclflc declslons by speclflc people" (Lnloe, 1989: 3). As lllusLraLlve of Lhe dlfference beLween sex and gender, she answers Lhe common Well, whaL abouL ______________?" quesLlon, ln whlch men Lrylng Lo lnvalldaLe any dlscusslon of gender ln lnLernaLlonal pollLlcs" lnserL lnLo Lhe blank space a female pollLlcal flgure who has been known Lo use force, 1haLcher, Condoleeza 8lce, CaLherlne 1he CreaL would all be candldaLes. Lnloe en[olns, lL's qulLe clear. LhaL a woman lsn'L lnherenLly or lrreverslbly anLl-mlllLarlsLlc or anLl-auLhorlLarlan. lL's a maLLer of soclal processes and sLrucLures LhaL have been creaLed and susLalned over Lhe generaLlons. (Lnloe, 1989: 6). Cne of Lnloe's key conLrlbuLlons Lo Lroubllng l8 ls her suggesLlon LhaL Lhe 'personal ls Lhe pollLlcal', whlch undermlned Lhe prevalenL noLlon LhaL Lhe prlvaLe sphere was somehow 'ouL of bounds' ln Lhe sLudy of securlLy" (eoples & vaughan-Wllllams, 2010: 38). Lnloe explalns furLher, LhaL relaLlonshlps we once lmaglned were prlvaLe or merely soclal are ln facL lnfused wlLh power, usually unequal power backed up by publlc auLhorlLy", and concludes LhaL lL has Laken power Lo deprlve women of land LlLles and leave Lhem llLLle cholce buL Lo sexually servlce soldlers and banana workers" (Lnloe, 1989: 193, 197-198). CrlLlque of Lhe femlnlsL llberal perspecLlve hlnges around Lhe ldea LhaL lL ls essenLlally poslLlvlsL, wlLh posL-poslLlvlsLs argulng LhaL Lnloe and oLher llberals slmply 'add women and sLlr', and LhaL Lhe poslLlon ls vulnerable Lo Lhe charge of essenLlallzlng women's ldenLlLles raLher Lhan appreclaLlng dlfference accordlng Lo race, class, eLhnlclLy, and oLher forms of soclal and geopollLlcal sLraLlflcaLlon" (eoples & vaughan-Wllllams, 2010: 38).
1he 'key poslLlon' of sLandpolnL femlnlsm ls ln conLrasL Lo Lhe llberal approach, whlch sLandpolnL and oLher femlnlsLs accuse of slmply addlng women lnLo a reallsL framework LhaL was consLrucLed for and by men, as LlshLaln suggesLs, no chlldren are ever born, and nobody ever dles, ln Lhls consLrucLed world. 1here are sLaLes, and Lhey are whaL ls" (LlshLaln, 1987: 91). lemlnlsL l8 LheorlsL !. Ann 1lckner asks us Lo Lhlnk abouL how Lhe dlsclpllne of lnLernaLlonal relaLlons mlghL look lf gender were lncluded as a caLegory of analysls and lf women's experlences were parL of Lhe sub[ecL maLLer ouL of whlch lLs Lheorles were consLrucLed" (1lckner: 1992: 3). 1lckner Lroubles Lhe 'men = lnLernaLlonal, women = domesLlc' dlchoLomles, demonsLraLlng LhaL Lhe ldeallzed noLlon of Lhe brave clLlzen-soldler abroad ls shown Lo 5$=$"5 -=(" Lhe devaluaLlon of Lhe female sub[ecL and myLhs abouL Lhe need for her proLecLlon aL home" (eoples & vaughan-Wllllams, 2010: 40). 1lckner, echolng Slmone ue 8eauvolr, also argues LhaL Lhe game ls rlgged, lf glvlng one's llfe for one's counLry has been consldered Lhe hlghesL form of paLrloLlsm, buL lL ls an acL from whlch women have been vlrLually excluded " (1lckner, 1992: 28). She also lamenLs Lhe exLenL Lo whlch, when women have Lrled Lo become more lnvolved ln naLlonal securlLy, Lhelr asplraLlons are denled by male power. lor example, when 8ella Abzug requesLed a seaL on Lhe Pouse Armed Servlces CommlLLee, seeklng Lo brlng an end Lo Lhe vleLnam confllcL, she was denled, wlLh one slLLlng member remarklng LhaL Lhe AgrlculLure CommlLLee would be more approprlaLe (1lckner, 1992: 2). lf boLh Lhe domesLlc and lnLernaLlonal were Laken lnLo conslderaLlon ln formulaLlng and creaLlng securlLy, 1lckner suggesLs Lhe end resulL would be a deflnlLlon of securlLy LhaL ls people-cenLered and Lranscends sLaLe and reglonal boundarles" (1lckner, 1993: 192).
As noLed earller, femlnlsL l8 ls noL a slngle monollLh, and, Lo wlL, posLsLrucLural femlnlsLs sLand ln counLerpolnL Lo Lhe llberal femlnlsLs llke CynLhla Lnloe, and Lhe sLandpolnL femlnlsLs llke !. Ann 1lckner. Whereas Lnloe and 1lckner seek Lo develop a programme ouL of a crlLlque of paLrlarchy, posLsLrucLurallsLs are heslLanL Lo deLermlne whaL should be done ln such an absLracL, essenLlallsL and unlversallzlng way", and commlL Lo a broader commlLmenL Lo quesLlonlng whaL lL means Lo make clalms abouL and ln Lhe name of 'men' and 'women'" (eoples & vaughan-Wllllams, 2010: 41). osLsLrucLural femlnlsLs do noL regard only gender as a soclal consLrucL, Lhey belleve sex Lo be soclally consLlLuLed as well. 1hus, posLsLrucLurallsLs argue LhaL we should noL confer any speclal onLologlcal sLaLus Lo 'manhood' or 'womanhood': Lhere ls no unlquely male or female vlew or experlence." (eoples & vaughan-Wllllams, 2010: 41). Pence, v. Splke eLerson argues LhaL femlnlsL l8 ls abouL Lransformlng ways of belng and knowlng ln Lhe sLudy of securlLy" (eLerson, 1992: 20). Some crlLlclsm of femlnlsL posLsLrucLurallsm comes from Lhe femlnlsL quarLer lLself, whlch argues LhaL ellmlnaLlng womanhood as an analyLlcal caLegory robs Lhe fleld of Lhe very node along whlch Lhe assaulL on paLrlarchy was Lo be mounLed. 1lckner argues, Lo be unable Lo speak for women only furLher relnforces Lhe volces of Lhose who have consLrucLed approaches Lo lnLernaLlonal relaLlons ouL of Lhe experlences of men" (1lckner, 1992:17).
LasLly, femlnlsL's Lroubllng of lnLernaLlonal relaLlons can be assessed uslng !acqul 1rue's framework of $0='%',&), &"&).#',&), and "(%0&#'>$ femlnlsms. Lmplrlcal femlnlsm correcLs Lhe denlal or mlsrepresenLaLlon of women ln world pollLlcs due Lo false assumpLlons LhaL male experlences can counL for boLh men and women, and LhaL women are elLher absenL from lnLernaLlonal pollLlcal acLlvlLles or noL relevanL Lo global processes" (1rue: 2009: 240). 1rue conLlnues
lnLernaLlonal relaLlons has been excesslvely focused on confllcL and anarchy and a way of pracLlclng sLaLecrafL and formulaLlng sLraLegy LhaL ls excesslvely focused on compeLlLlon and fear. As a resulL, neo-reallsL and neo-llberal lnLernaLlonal 8elaLlons scholars Lheorlze pollLlcs and Lhe lnLernaLlonal realm ln a way LhaL guaranLees LhaL women wlll be absenL from Lhelr lnqulry, and LhaL Lhelr research agendas remaln unalLered (1rue, 2009: 241)
Powever, lL ls noL only Lhe hallowed halls of reallsm and llberallsm LhaL femlnlsLs Lrouble. Lena Pansen, who has wrlLLen wlLh Copenhagen School Lhlnkers 8uzan and Waever, ls also one of Lhelr greaLesL crlLlcs. ln '1he LlLLle Mermald's SllenL SecurlLy ullemma and Lhe Absence of Cender ln Lhe Copenhagen School', Pansen clLes several crlLlclsms, lncludlng how Lhe school vlews socleLy and ldenLlLy, whaL role Lhe analysL plays, and Lhe exLenL Lo whlch Lhe securlLlzaLlon Lheory ls sLlll essenLlally conservaLlve. ?eL", she conLlnues, Lhe sLrlklng absence of gender has noL been a sub[ecL of dlscusslon" (Pansen, 2004: 286). Per crlLlque revolves around Lwo concepLs, whlch she calls 'securlLy as sllence', and 'subsumlng securlLy'. 'SecurlLy as sllence', Pansen proclalms, occurs when acLors cannoL 'speak securlLy' for Lhemselves, lndeed, ln some cases, as ln Lhe case of honour kllllngs ln aklsLan, Lhey cannoL even have female ellLes speak securlLy ln Lhelr sLead. Pansen's second crlLlque ls LhaL securlLy ldenLlLles are subsumed ln some cases. Looklng aL Lhe mass rapes ln 8osnla, Pansen asserLs LhaL Lhe rapes were subsumed by Lhe 8osnlan and Serblan governmenLs ln a securlLy debaLe cenLered on Lhe naLlon", whlch sllenced LhreaLs Lo raped Musllm women comlng from Lhelr own socleLy" (Pansen, 2004: 299).
ConLrasLed wlLh emplrlcal femlnlsm, analyLlcal femlnlsm asserLs Lhe hegemonlc WesLern brand of mascullnlLy ls assoclaLed wlLh auLonomy, soverelgnLy, Lhe capaclLy for reason and ob[ecLlvlLy and unlversallsm, whereas Lhe domlnanL noLlon of femlnlnlLy ls assoclaLed wlLh Lhe absence or lack of Lhese characLerlsLlcs" (1rue, 2009: 246). 1rue argues LhaL Lhe femlnlne-mascullne 'blnary opposlLlon' ls reproduced ln Lhe publlc/prlvaLe and lnLernaLlonal/domesLlc dlchoLomles so beloved of lnLernaLlonal relaLlons, relnforclng lLs lnslsLence LhaL Lhe domesLlc, prlvaLe sphere ls one of lrraLlonallLy, dlsorder, and anarchy (1rue, 2009: 247). AL Lhe core of Lhe argumenL ls an asserLlon LhaL
Lhe lndependence of domesLlc pollLlcs from lnLernaLlonal pollLlcs and Lhe separaLlon of publlc from prlvaLe spheres cannoL be Lhe basls for a dlsclpllnary boundary, slnce anarchy ouLslde and gender hlerarchy aL home may be muLually relnforclng. 1hroughouL modern hlsLory, for example, women have been Lold LhaL Lhey wlll recelve equallLy wlLh men, afLer Lhe war, afLer llberaLlon, afLer Lhe naLlonal economy has been rebullL and so on: buL afLer all Lhese 'ouLslde' forces have been conquered, Lhe commonplace demand ls for Lhlngs Lo go back Lo normal, and women Lo a subordlnaLe place (1rue, 2009: 248).
LasLly, normaLlve femlnlsm makes Lhe clalm LhaL gender ls a #%&"2;(%0&#'>$ caLegory from a normaLlve perspecLlve noL because we can deconsLrucL lL or do away wlLh lL, buL because once we undersLand lL as a soclal consLrucLlon we can Lransform how lL works aL all levels of soclal and pollLlcal llfe" (1rue, 2009: 233). 1rue explalns, from a normaLlve femlnlsL perspecLlve aLLenLlve Lo Lhe pollLlcs of knowledge, gender dlfference ls noL merely abouL Lhe relaLlons beLween mascullne and femlnlne ldenLlLles, lL ls abouL how and from whaL poslLlon ln Lhe hlerarchy we can know" (1rue, 2009: 234). 1hls becomes parLlcularly sallenL when looklng aL crlLlclsm of gender as a concepL arlses, ln parLlcular Lhe crlLlque from subalLern quarLers. Chandra MohanLy (llke Pansen) poslLs LhaL Lhe use of gender subsumes oLher manners ln whlch Lhe norLh oppresses Lhe SouLh, and crlLlclzes WesLern femlnlsLs' consLrucL of a '1hlrd World Woman' whlch ls based on an 'orlenLallzed' vlew of Lhe SouLh (1rue, 2009: 233).
1hus does femlnlsm 'Lrouble' Lhe fleld of lnLernaLlonal relaLlons. lemlnlsm conLlnues Lo look aL Lhe effecLs of mascullne blas on lnLernaLlonal relaLlons, whlch 1lckner asserLs prlvlleges lssue LhaL grow ouL of men's experlences, we are soclallzed lnLo bellevlng LhaL war and power pollLlcs are spheres of acLlvlLy wlLh whlch men have a speclal afflnlLy and LhaL Lhelr volces ln descrlblng and prescrlblng for Lhls world are Lherefore llkely Lo be more auLhenLlc" (1lckner, 1992: 2). lemlnlsm asks 'Where are Lhe women?', and seeks Lo slghL, slLe and clLe women ln lnLernaLlonal relaLlons, ln narraLlves where Lhey have been convenlenLly lefL ouL, wheLher mlllLary base sex workers, dlplomaLlc wlves, mulLl-naLlonal frulL company spokesmodels, or sweaLshop seamsLresses (Lnloe, 1989). lemlnlsm also asks how lnLernaLlonal relaLlons Lheory should be relmaglned and reworked ln llghL of gender, ln whlch Marya Zalewskl suggesLs a dual beneflL: lL would confronL Lhe clrcular reasonlng LhaL keeps Lhe world golng ln ways we perhaps don'L wanL", and, faclllLaLes Lhe consLrucLlon of a very dlfferenL sLory LhaL whaL a 'kenneLh WalLz' or 'Alexander WendL' mlghL glve you' (SchouLen, 2009: 3). lemlnlsLs use llberal, sLandpolnL, and posLsLrucLural approaches ln Lhelr research, as well as emplrlcal, analyLlcal, and normaLlve research Lo creaLe Lhe broadenlng and deepenlng of l8 LhaL femlnlsL approaches provlde. Cne way of gauglng Lhe exLenL Lo whlch Lhe femlnlsL crlLlque, ln all lLs shapes and colours, has begun Lo be Laken serlously ls by Lhe number of academlc LexLs whlch feaLure chapLers on femlnlsm (8urchlll, eL all, 2009) (Pughes & Meng: 2011) (eoples & vaughan-Wllllams, 2010) (Sheehan, 2003). erhaps uavld 8oberLs sums Lhe poLenLlal beneflL Lo lnLernaLlonal relaLlons from femlnlsL approaches, and Lherefore Lhe world aL large, when he declares Andrarchy robs men of Lhe poLenLlal for a very dlfferenL, and beLLer, llves wlLh women, and lL robs women of equallLy and opporLunlLles Lo en[oy peaceful and enrlchlng llves wlLh men" (8oberLs, 2008: 134). lf Lhls lndeed be Lhe beneflL, lL wlll remaln well worLh belng 'Lroubled'.
Bibliogiaphy
Cohn, Caiol (1987) 'Sex anu Beath in the Rational Woilu of Befense Intellectuals', !"#$%, vol.12, No.4: pp. 687-718
Bansen, Lene (2uu4) 'The Little Neimaiu's Silent Secuiity Bilemma anu the Absence of uenuei in the Copenhagen School', 3"99*$";)2 <(;-$+9 (7 8$6*-$+6"($+9 !6;,"*%, vol.29, No.2: pp. 28S-Su6
}ones, Anuiew (1996) 'Boes genuei make the woilu go iounu. Feminist ciitiques of inteinational ielations', =*>"*? (7 8$6*-$+6"($+9 !6;,"*%, vol.22: pp. 4uS-429
Peoples, Columba, anu vaughan-Williams, Nick (2u1u) @-"6"0+9 !*0;-"6A !6;,"*%2 B$ 8$6-(,;06"($. Nilton Paik: Routleuge.
Peteison, v. Spike (2uu4) 'Feminist Theoiies Within, Invisible To, anu Beyonu IR', .-(?$ <(;-$+9 (7 '(-9, B77+"-%/ vol. X, Issue 2: pp. SS-46
Schouten, P. (2uu9) 'Theoiy Talk #28: Naiysia Zalewski on 0nsettling IR, Nasculinity anu Naking IR Theoiy Inteiesting (again)',G1*(-A G+94%, http:www.theoiy- talks.oig2uu9u4theoiy-talk-28.html (Su-2-2u12)
Ticknei, }. Ann (1992) C*$,*- "$ 8$6*-$+6"($+9 =*9+6"($%2 5*)"$"%6 :*-%I*06">*% ($ B01"*>"$# C9(J+9 !*0;-"6A. New Yoik: Columbia 0niveisity Piess
Ticknei, }. Ann (199S) 'Revisioning Secuiity', in K. Booth anu S. Smith, eus., 8$6*-$+6"($+9 =*9+6"($% G1*(-A G(,+A. Cambiiuge: Polity Piess. pp. 17S-197.
Tiue, }acqui (2uu9) 'Feminism', in S. Buichill, et al, G1*(-"*% (7 8$6*-$+6"($+9 =*9+6"($%. Bounusmills: Palgiave Nacmillan. pp. 2S7-2S7.