RevieW's RevieW's The The Review Review Section Section of of E&A E&A consists consists of of three three parts. parts. The The first first is is made made up up of of brief brief reviews reviews of of books books and and articles articles (and (and perhaps perhaps films films etc.) etc.) which which are are concerned concerned in in some some way way with with the the rights rights and and wrongs wrongs of of human human treatment treatment of of non-human non-human animals. animals. These These reviews reviews will will be be both both critical critical and and reportive--primarily reportive--primarily reportive reportive in in the the case case of of most most scientific scientific and and historical historical material, material, and and increasingly increasingly critical critical as as the the material material is is more more argumentative argumentative and and philosophical. philosophical. The The second second part part of of this this Section Section is is entitled entitled 'Second 'Second Opinions' Opinions' and and contains contains second second (and (and usually usually dissenting) dissenting) reviews reviews of of works works reviewed reviewed in in the the first first part part in in earlier earlier numbers numbers of of E&A. E&A. After After aa review review appears appears in in E&A E&A (and (and after after the the 'second 'second opinion' opinion' if if one one appears appears within within the-- the-- next next two two numbers) numbers) the the Editor Editor will will invite invite the the author author of of the the original original work work to to submit submit aa brief brief rejoinder rejoinder to to the the review(s). review(s). Rejoinders Rejoinders received received will will appear appear in in the the third third part part of of the the Review Review Section. Section. Members Members of of the the SSEA SSEA who who wish wish to to submit submit reviews reviews (first (first or or second), second), or or recommend recommend works works for for review, review, should should contact contact the the Editor. Editor. Books Books LIBERATION, LIBERATION, that that factory-farm factory-farm conditions conditions frustrate frustrate animals' animals' innate innate natures natures and and desires. desires. "Here "Here the the fundamental fundamental liberal liberal assumption assumption is is placed placed on on its its naturalistic naturalistic basis--that basis--that all all creatures creatures should should be be left left to to do do what what comes comes naturally naturally to to them, them, since since the the natural natural incli- incli- nations nations naturally naturally lead lead to to what what is is most most whole- whole- some some and and advantageous advantageous for for aa creature, creature, and and thus thus aa life life according according to to unhmapered unhmapered natural natural inclination inclination is is assumed assumed (romantically) (romantically) to to be be the the best best kind kind of of life." life." This This is is not not in in fact fact correct correct as as an an account account of of the the position position held held by by Singer Singer and and other other "contemporary "contemporary defenders defenders of of animal animal rights." rights." Singer's Singer's argument argument is is that that animals animals have have unlearned unlearned desires desires which which are are frustrated frustrated under under factory- factory- farm farm conditions, conditions, causing causing suffering; suffering; the the fundamental fundamental assumption assumption here here is is not not that that all all creatures creatures should should be be left left to to do do what what comes comes naturally naturally to to them them (though (though of of course course one one miggt miggt believe believe that), that), but but that that suffering suffering is is ad. ad. In In Goodman's Goodman's long long introduction introduction we we encounter encounter Kant, Kant, in in the the midst midst of of aa discussion discussion of of the the fable's fable's mystical mystical ecology. ecology. Goodman Goodman correctly correctly notes notes that that "from "from the the [Kantianl [Kantianl notion notion that that the the moral moral law law commands commands the the creation creation of of a a kingdom kingdom of of ends ends it it does does not not follow follow that that only only persons persons can can be be objects objects of of moral moral treat- treat- ment", ment", though though II doubt doubt that that "the "the argument argument extends extends to to plants plants and and inanimate inanimate objects objects as as well well as as to to animals." animals." The The central central moral moral concept concept in in the the fable, fable, according according to to Goodman, Goodman, is is "the "the concept concept that that every every animal animal species species and and in in aa way way every every animal animal individual individual is is an an end end in in itself itself (despite (despite the the fact fact that that none none is is aa moral moral subject subject or or in in aa human human sense sense aa conscious conscious subj subj ect) ect) through. through. .. .. the the possibility possibility of of human human subjects subjects projecting projecting themselves themselves into into any any creature's creature's position." position." Goodman Goodman discusses discusses Darwin, Darwin, Maimonides, Maimonides, Spinoza, Spinoza, Plutarch, Plutarch, Descartes, Descartes, Plato, Plato, Mary Mary Midgley Midgley and and many many others others whose whose ideas ideas he he belives belives can can be be usefully usefully compared compared to to those those in in this this work. work. The The fable fable itself itself is is often often charming charming and and sometimes sometimes wise. wise. Anyone Anyone who who enjoyed enjoyed Stephen Stephen R. R. L. L. Clark's Clark's THE THE MORAL MORAL STATUS STATUS OF OF would, would, II expect, expect, GOODMAN, GOODMAN, LENN LENN EVAN EVAN (TRANS,), (TRANS,), THE THE CASE CASE OF OF TijE TijE enjoy enjoy this this book, book, though though it it is is obviously obviously not not ANIMALS ANIMALS VERSUS VERSUS MAN MAN BEFORE BEFORE THE THE KING KING OF OF THE THE JINN JINN essential essential reading reading for for philosophers. philosophers. (BOSTON: (BOSTON: TWAYNE) TWAYNE) 1978. 1978. Edward Edward Johnson Johnson This This book book is is aa philosophical philosophical curiosity: curiosity: .a .a University University of of New New Orleans Orleans tenth-century tenth-century Arabic Arabic ecological ecological fable fable about about 150 150 pages. pages. Goodman, Goodman, the the .. provides provides another another hundred hundred pages pages of of notes in in which which we we encounter encounter such such and and notes, aa the the Case Case of of the the Animals as as comparison between between and and Peter Peter argument, argument, in in ANII1AL ANII1AL