Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Chapter 13
Precipitation Evaporation
ge ta tio n
oil
from s
fro m
ati on
po ra tio n
Tr an sp ir
ce ru
noff
Infiltration
Soil
Percolation Ocean
fro
Surfa
ms tre a
va
ms
from oc
n iratio Transp
ve
ean
Chapter 13
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individuals income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDAs TARGET Center at (202) 7202600 (voice and TDD). To le a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Ofce of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 202509410, or call (800) 7953272 (voice) or (202) 7206382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
(210VINEH, July 2007)
Acknowledgments
Chapter 13 was originally prepared by Victor Mockus (retired) in 1956 and was reprinted with minor revisions in 1971. This version was revised by William Merkel, hydraulic engineer, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Beltsville, Maryland, and Helen Fox Moody, hydraulic engineer, NRCS, Beltsville, Maryland, under the guidance of Donald E. Woodward, retired, NRCS, Washington, DC.
13i
Chapter 13
13ii
Chapter 13
Contents
630.1300 630.1301
131 131
(a) Simple cases. ..................................................................................................131 (b) Complex cases...............................................................................................134 630.1302 630.1303 630.1304 Flood peak or volume versus area inundated method Frequency versus area inundated method Computer determination of area inundated 136 136 137
(a) HECRAS program. .......................................................................................137 (b) HECGeoRAS................................................................................................137 (c) WSP2 program...............................................................................................137 (d) Comparison method. .....................................................................................137 630.1305 630.1306 630.1307 Combination method of determining area inundated Stereoscopic and other methods References 138 139 1310
Tables
Table 131
Sample computation of stage versus area inundated for a simple case using a representative cross section in the reach Sample computation of stage versus area inundated at selected depths of ooding Sample computation of stage versus area inundated with two cross sections in the reach (head and foot) and drainage areas not signicantly different Sample computation of stage versus area inundated with two cross sections in the reach (head and foot) and drainage areas at the sections vary signicantly Sample computation of stage versus area inundated with three cross sections in the reach and drainage areas at the sections not signicantly different
131
Table 132
131
Table 133
134
Table 134
135
Table 135
135
13iii
Chapter 13
Figures
Figure 131 Increasing area ooded caused by increasing ooding stage Figure 132 Area ooded at given depth of ooding increments Figure 133
132
133
Flood damage reach showing weighting of area between 135 cross sections
13iv
Chapter 13
630.1300 Introduction
Water resources planning often requires tabular or plotted data showing the relation between the area inundated and stream stage, discharge, ood volume, or frequency. These types of data are called stage inundation relations and are often used in the economic evaluation of a projects justication. The information is developed using data obtained in project eld surveys. Different planning efforts require different levels of accuracy and detail in stage inundation relations, and the expected use of the information should ultimately dictate the preferred analysis technique. Section 611.0201 of the National Water Resources Economics Handbook provides some guidance for ood damage analysis.
Table 131
Sample computation of stage versus area inundated for a simple case using a representative cross section in the reach
Width minus Inundated area channel width in reach 1/ (ft) (acres) (3) (4)
Table 132
4 2/ 6 8 10 12 14
Acres inundated at given depths 1/ 02 (ft) (3) 24 (ft) (4) 46 (ft) (5) >6 2/ (ft) (6)
1/ Computed using the width minus channel width (col. 3) and the valley length of the reach. In this case, the reach is 8,640 feet long. To get acres, the formula is: (col. 3) = 0.1984 (col. 3) = col. 4 43,560 8,640
4 6 8 10 12 14
0 0 0 0 13.5 68.0
1/ Values can also be obtained graphically. See gure 132. 2/ Values are those of the total area inundated (col. 2) shifted downward three lines.
2/ Stage at which ood damages begin is 4 feet. (210VINEH, July 2007) 131
Chapter 13
Figure 131
6 ft
6 ft 4 ft: Bankfull
8 ft
6 ft
6 ft
8 ft
4 ft: Bankfull
Area flooded 02 feet depth 54.5 acres 24 feet depth 13.5 acres Total 68.0 acres
46 ft depth
10 ft
8 ft
6 ft
6 ft 8 ft 4 ft: Bankfull
10 ft
Area flooded 02 feet depth 47.8 acres 24 feet depth 54.5 acres 46 feet depth 13.5 acres Total 115.8 acres
24 ft depth
02 ft depth
12 ft 10 ft 8 ft 6 ft 6 ft 10 ft 8 ft 12 ft Area flooded 02 feet depth 35.3 acres 24 feet depth 47.8 acres 46 feet depth 54.5 acres Over 6 feet depth 13.5 acres Total 151.1 acres
4 ft: Bankfull
132
Chapter 13
Figure 131
02 ft depth
24 ft depth
46 ft depth
Over 6 ft depth
46 ft depth
24 ft depth
02 ft depth
14 ft 12 ft 10 ft 8 ft
8 ft 4 ft: Bankfull
10 ft
14 ft 12 ft Area flooded 02 feet depth 17.1 acres 24 feet depth 35.3 acres 46 feet depth 47.8 acres Over 6 feet depth 68.0 acres Total 168.2 acres
Stage in feet
0 to 2 ft
40
80
120
160
Chapter 13
od is applicable when the channels are not excessively eroded or silted and the cross section rating curves are consistent between the two cross sections. The method of expressing the same discharge in cubic feet per second per square mile is sometimes used, but this method ignores the fact that this relation is seldom linear. The upstream bankfull discharge in cubic feet per second per square mile is normally greater (for natural channels in noncohesive materials and in an equilibrium condition or nearly so) than the downstream bankfull discharge in cubic feet per second per square mile. In these cases, discharges should be used that are of the same frequency. For example, the top width for the 2-year frequency discharge at the upper section is averaged with the top width for the 2-year frequency discharge at the lower section, and so on. When this frequency method is not used and the channel sections vary widely, much accuracy in the averaging should not be expected. With more than two cross sections, a system of weighting must be used. Figure 133 shows a typical reach with seven cross sections. The weight for section A is a/L, for section B it is b/L, and so on. Table 135 shows a computation using three cross sections. The method illustrated in table 132 is used to complete the work.
Table 133
Sample computation of stage versus area inundated with two cross sections in the reach (head and foot) and drainage areas not signicantly different
Head of reach cross section 2 stage (ft) (3) top width (ft) (4) Areas related to foot of reach 1/ stage (ft) (5) average top width (ft) (6) average top width minus channel width (ft) (7) inundated area in reach 2/ (acres) (8)
Foot of reach cross section 1 stage (ft) (1) top width (ft) (2)
10 3/ 12 14 16
7 3/ 9 11 13
10 3/ 12 14 16
1/ If related to middle of reach, the stages (col. 5) are 8.5, 10.5, 12.5, and 14.5 2/ Length of valley in reach is 4,230 feet, and 3/ Bankfull stage 134
(col. 7) = (col. 8)
Chapter 13
Table 134
Sample computation of stage versus area inundated with two cross sections in the reach (head and foot) and drainage areas at the sections vary signicantly
Cross section B Head of reach (D.A.=24.0 mi2) discharge top width (ft) (ft) (4) (5)
Cross section A Foot of reach (D.A.=36.0 mi2) stage (ft) (1) discharge top width (ft3/s) (ft) (2) (3)
Areas related to foot of reach (cross section A) average top width (ft) (6) average top width minus channel width (ft) (7) inundated area in reach 3/ (acres) (8)
10 12 14 16
1/ Bankfull discharge 2/ Proportioned by the bankfull discharge ratio 680/720. For example, 680 720
4,080 43,560
(col. 7) = (col. 8)
Table 135
Sample computation of stage versus area inundated with three cross sections in the reach and drainage areas at the sections not signicantly different
Related to cross section 1 weighted top width inundated area weighted top width minus channel width in reach 3/ (ft) (ft) (acres) (7) (8) (9)
Cross section 1 Cross section 2 Cross section 3 weight = 0.22 weight = 0.47 weight = 0.31 stage (ft) (1) top width (ft) (2) stage (ft) (3) top width (ft) (4) stage (ft) (5) top width (ft) (6)
8 1/ 10 12 14
10 1/ 12 14 16
7 1/ 9 11 13
1/ Bankfull stage. Widths at this stage are channel widths. 2/ 39.8 = 0.22 (42) + 0.47 (44) + 0.31 (32). The weights are in proportion to total reach length as shown on gure 133. 3/ Length of reach is 8,620 feet, and
8,620 43,560 (col. 8) = (col. 9)
Figure 133
Head of reach
G F
f
g
C
c
Path of flow
Lengths a, b, c, etc., are measured along the path of flow. Length of reach "L" = a+b+c+d+e+f+g. Cross section A has the weight a/L; while B has the weight b/L; and so on. Flood plain lengths may be more appropriate to use for weighting in some cases. Flood plain lengths are usually shorter than channel lengths which are illustrated here.
Chapter 13
136
Chapter 13
by NRCS. Use of HECRAS for water surface proles is recommended because of its ability to handle both subcritical and supercritical ow. Stage inundation relations from WSP2 may be used in the ECON2 program to determine agricultural economic damages because of inundation. Many older projects will have hydraulic data available for the WSP2 format and, if all ows are subcritical, this program may still be used. New projects should use HECRAS.
Chapter 13
Hydrologic procedures use information developed from hydrologic studies, such as WinTR20 (Computer Program for Project Formulation Hydrology) and/or HECRAS runs to delineate inundated areas. Gage heights can be used to relate geomorphic surfaces with historic oods. Historic information obtained from interviews and newspaper articles can provide valuable data on extent and depth of ooding. In some cases, aerial photographs can be obtained for recent oods.
138
Chapter 13
Other methods involving areal measurement are sometimes useful. For example, ood lines for each of several oods may be used to delineate inundated areas on aerial photos, which are measured and related to stage or runoff or frequency. If a ood plain delineation can be depicted on a GIS layer, its area can then be determined by GIS methods. The USACEs HEC GeoRAS program can be used to develop a ood inundation map based on digital data. The ood boundary developed by HECGeoRAS can be overlaid on an aerial photograph (digital orthoquad, or DOQ) and checked for accuracy. Generally, lack of data on the location of the ood lines of historic oods limits the application of this and similar methods.
where: Cf = correction factor Step 8 Compute the area for various other oods using widths as in step 5 and assuming the ood plain outline increases and decreases parallel to the outline of the selected recent large ood. For a given reach length, use the correction factor of step 6, if required. Step 9 Plot area ooded versus stage at the selected cross section. Step 10 Determine areas ooded at required depth increments (table 132).
(210VINEH, July 2007) 139
Chapter 13
630.1307 References
Reckendorf, F.F. 1968. Methods of identication and mapping of ood plains. American Soc. Agric. Eng. Pap. 68232. St. Joseph, MI. Sigafoos, R.S. 1964. Botanical evidence of oods and ood plain deposition. U.S. Geological Survey Prof. Pap. 485A. U.S. Government Printing Ofce, Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. WinTR20, Ver. 1.00, Computer Program for Project Formulation Hydrology. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2000. Selected statistical methods. National Engineering Handbook, part 630, chapter 18. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Economicsoodwater damage (ECON2 PC, Ver. dated 11/05/1991). Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Computer program for water surface proles (WSP2 PC, Ver. 2.0). Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1993, rev. 2005. Computer program for water surface proles (WSP2). National Engineering Handbook (NEH) part 630, ch. 31. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. HECRAS, Ver. 3.1.3. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. HECGeoRAS, Ver. 4.1.1. Washington, DC.
1310