Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Pro Blocks
Adaptation Prevents Loss of Biodiversity in the Ocean
1. Source - IPCC. IPCC Technical Paper: Fifth Edition. Climate Change and Biodiversity. 2002. a. Analysis - By introducing aquaculture and mariculture, and enhancing sustainable agriculture and rural development, we will effectively adapt to the problem, thus, preventing any loss of biodiversity. i. Data - The Development of mariculture and aquaculture as a response to the impacts on coastal fisheries is an adaptation option. Aquaculture and mariculture would reduce the impact on the remaining coastal systems.
1|Page
2|Page
3|Page
2. [Cooperation over war] Source - Ashok Swain, "Mission Not yet Accomplished: Managing Water Resources in the Nile River Basin," Journal of International Affairs 61, no. 2 (2008). a. Analysis Evidence shows that in the past decade, when water resources caused problems within nations, there was considerably more cooperation than conflict. This just goes on to show that water wars are extremely unlikely as a result of climate change. i. Data Research on water conflicts in the past decade shows that there is considerably more cooperation over trans-boundary water resources than conflict. 3. Water Conservation techniques solve.
4|Page
5|Page
6|Page
7|Page
8|Page
9|Page
associated with the learning and doing process (Ebohon et al., 1997) Ebohon, O.J., B.G. Field, and R. Ford, 1997: Institutional deficiencies and capacity building constraints: the dilemma for environmentally sustainable development in Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 4(3), 204213. 5.) Through information sharing, climate satellites solve. Mitigation economic benefits fail. 1.) GDP effects unproven 2.) Life outweighs 3.) Germanys program is a failure economically: According to Hendriks of the Department of Global Change Research Hence, although Germanys promotion of renewable energies is commonly portrayed in the media as setting a shining example in providing a harvest for the world (The Guardian, 2007), we would instead regard the countrys experience as a cautionary tale of massively expensive environmental and energy policy that is devoid of economic and environmental benefits. As other European
governments emulate Germany by ramping up their promotion of renewables, policy makers should scrutinize the logic of supporting energy sources that cannot compete on the market in the absence of government assistance.
Hendriks, I.E., C.M. Duarte, and M. Alvarez. "Economic Impacts from the Promotion of Renewable Energy Technologies: The German Experience." Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 86.2 (2009): 164. Science Direct. Elsevier, 24 Nov. 2009. Web. 19 July 2012. <linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/articleSelectSinglePerm?Redirect=http://www.sciencedirect.c om/science/article/pii/S027277140900537X>. Department of Global Change Research. IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Instituto Mediterrneo de Estudios Avanzados, C/Miquel Marqus 21, 07190 Esporles (Mallorca), Spain 4.) Net Job loss: According to Richard Marsh, Research Director of Verso 5.) Economics The Verso study finds that after the annual diversion of some 330 million British pounds from the rest of the U.K. economy, the result has been the destruction of 3.7 jobs for every green job created."
Richard Marsh, Research Director of Verso Economics. Tom Miers, Scottish Public Policy Analyst. "Worth The Candle?: The Economic Impact of Renewable Energy Policy in Scotland and the UK." March 2011. (http://www.versoeconomics.com/verso-0311B.pdf)
1.) A lot of infrastructure would be required for this. According to The Royal Society, a Fellowship of the world's most eminent scientists and the oldest scientific academy in continuous existence, (2009) In order to keep the CO2 levels at 450 ppm would require a removal of 650 billion tons of carbon from the atmosphere by 2100. The Royal Society estimates that the infrastructure required to achieve this will be "as large, or larger than, [the infrastructure] of the current fossil fuel extraction."
2.) Too expensive. According to James Hansen, NASA, 2009 James Hansen estimates that in order for 50 ppm of CO2 removal, the cost would be in the range of $20 trillion.
3.) utilizes fossil fuels Adaptation Cheap
Bosello, Francesco, Carlo Carraro, and Enrica De Cian. Climate Policy and the Optimal Balance between Mitigation, Adaptation and Unavoided Damage. Vol. 1. N.p.: Climate Change Economics, 2010. Print. Iss. 2. 1.) Globally, adaptation can achieve a damage reduction of roughly US$ 35 trillion at the cost of US$ 3 trillion, within the period 2000-2200 using a 3% discount rate. Bosello, Francesco, Carlo Carraro, and Enrica De Cian. Climate Policy and the Optimal Balance between Mitigation, Adaptation and Unavoided Damage. Vol. 1. N.p.: Climate Change Economics, 2010. Print. Iss. 2. 2.) Optimal adaptation alone could reduce residual damages up to 55% in 2100 averting about US$ 8 trillion damages (from 4% to 1.5% of GWP). Optimal mitigation alone would lower damage up to 20%, avoiding about US$ 3 trillion worth of damages (from 4% to 3% of GWP). Parry, Martin, Nigel Arnell, and Pam Berry. "Assessing the Costs of Adaptation to Climate Change." Iied.org. Imperial College London, n.d. Web. 19 July 2012. <Assessing the costs of adaptation to climate change>. 3.) The UNFCC study analytically cost out structural measures like the expansion of water supply systems, and found out it will often be cheaper to apply soft adaptation options. Measures to use water more efficiently, for example, may obviate the need for expensive new infrastructure.
12 | P a g e
Bosello, Francesco, Carlo Carraro, and Enrica De Cian. Climate Policy and the Optimal Balance between Mitigation, Adaptation and Unavoided Damage. Vol. 1. N.p.: Climate Change Economics, 2010. Print. Iss. 2. 1.0 Mitigation has to start well in advance compared to adaptation. This occurs for two reasons. First, mitigation takes more time to become effective because it works against the carbon cycle inertia. Therefore, to enjoy mitigation benefits within the century, actions need to start immediately. Second, emission reduction is achieved mostly through innovation. This option needs large upfront investments, which pay off only in the long-term. "Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Reducing Emissions and Stabilizing the Climate." UN News Center. UN, n.d. Web. 19 July 2012. <http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/climatechange/mitigation.shtml>. 2 Any comprehensive solution to climate change will stabilize concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at a safe level, a goal defined as the central objective of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. (FRAMEWORK) But this will involve considerable costs. The estimates of global investment requirements for mitigation vary widely, depending, in part, on how stringent the stabilization target is.
"Climate Change - US$1 Trillion Investment Needed Yearly." Nation.com. The Nation, 2 Sept. 2009. Web. 19 July 2012. <http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2009/09/02/business/business_30111253.php>. 3 The global energy system needs investment of at least US$1 trillion per year during the coming decades to mitigate and adapt to the impact from climate change
Nelson, Julie, Frank Ackerman, Neva Goodwin, and Kristen Sheeran. "How Costly Is Climate Change Mitigation?" N.p., 11 Mar. 2008. Web. 19 July 2012. <http://www.e3network.org/papers/HowCostlyMitigation2008.pdf> 4. The net costs of climate change mitigation policy are estimated, but the welfare benefits from the mitigation are not. Meanwhile, the framing of climate change as involving only marginal price changes within an otherwise unchanged economy ignores the depth of the problem.
A2 Ocean Acidification
Hendriks, I.E., C.M. Duarte, and M. lvarez. "Vulnerability of Marine Biodiversity to Ocean Acidification: A Meta-analysis." Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 86.2 (2010): 164. Science Direct. Elsevier, 24 Nov. 2009. Web. 19 July 2012. <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027277140900537X>. Department of Global Change Research. IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Instituto Mediterrneo de Estudios Avanzados, C/Miquel Marqus 21, 07190 Esporles (Mallorca), Spain
13 | P a g e
[Not that bad] In summary, our analysis shows that marine biota is more resistant to ocean acidification than suggested by pessimistic predictions identifying ocean acidification as a major threat to marine biodiversity ( [Kleypas et al., 1999], [Orr et al., 2005], [Raven, 2005], [Sponberg, 2007] and [Zondervan et al., 2001]), which may not be the widespread problem conjured into the 21st century. Effects are likely to be minor along the range ofpCO2 predicted for the 21st century, and feedbacks between positive responses of autotrophs and pH may further buffer the impacts.
Hofmann GE, Smith JE, Johnson KS, Send U, Levin LA, et al. (2011) High-Frequency Dynamics of Ocean pH: A Multi-Ecosystem Comparison.
2.)
[more neutral not acidic] According to Hofmann of the Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara In reality, its quite the opposite. The increase in CO2 is making the ocean, not more corrosive, but more neutral. Since both alkalinity and acidity corrode things, the truth is that rainwater (or more CO2) will make the ocean slightly less corrosive, by marginally neutralizing its slight alkalinity. That is the problem with the term acidify, and it is why I use and insist on the more accurate term neutralize. Using acidify, is both alarmist and incorrect. The ocean is not getting acidified by additional CO2. It is getting neutralized by additional CO2.
Eschenbach, Willis. "The Ocean Is Not Getting Acidified." Watts Up With That? 27 Dec. 2011. Web. <http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/12/27/the-ocean-is-not-getting-acidified/>. [Continued] The ocean will adapt, some creatures ranges will change a bit, some species will be slightly advantaged and others slightly disadvantaged. But CO2 has been high before this. Overall, making the ocean slightly more neutral will likely be beneficial to life, which doesnt like alkalinity but doesnt mind acidity at all.
14 | P a g e