vi INDEX S.No. 1. 2.. 3. 4. 5. Particulars Chapter I Introductory. Background of Decision dated 30.12.2010. Arguments on some General aspects.

Scope of Proceedings u/s 5(3) of the Act. Chapter II 6. Reference No. 2 of 2011 Points taken by Karnataka. Point No. 2(i) Remaining unallocated water Point No. 2(ii) Return flows. Point No. 2(iii) Restriction on UKP utilization. Point No. 2(iv) Water Savings & Planning. Point No. 2(v) About validity of clearances already given in respect of UKP. Point No. 2(vi) Allocation of more quantity of water to Andhra Pradesh against doctrine of equality of States & selfcontradictory to its findings. Point No. 2(vii) Drinking water and water for industrial use separate allocation. Point No. 2(viii) Regulated Release from Almatti to Andhra Pradesh. Point No. (2(x) Objection to allocation for Telugu Ganga. Point No. 2(xii) Minimum flows . 38-47 47-55 55-57 57-62 62-70 Page Nos. 1-37 1-6 6-17 17-24 24-37 38-80

7. 8. 9 10. 11.

12.

71-73

13.

73-74

14.

74-76

15. 16.

76-78 78-80

vii INDEX S.No. 1. Particulars Chapter III Reference No. 3 of 2011 : Clarification sought by Maharashtra Clarification No. 1 Claim for increase in surplus allocation. Clarification No. II Reduction in carry-over storage provided to Andhra Pradesh. Clarification No. III Return Flows. Clarification No. IV Proportion of incremental shares of the States at different dependabiliites. Clarification no. V Minimum flows. Clarification No. VI To clarifiy that the allocations made by this Tribunal are enbloc. Clarification No. VII- Correction in Clause X 1(a) of the Order correcting it as mainstream of river Bhima. Clarification No. VIII Relaxation in use from Ghataprabha Sub-basin K-3. Clarification No. IX Drinking water supply for Chennai. Clarification No. X Review Authority. Clarification No. XI Expenditure incurred by KWD-IB on administration of Tungabhadra project be shared only by Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh and not by Maharashtra. Clarification No. XII Sedimentation within 20 Kms of Maharashtra its dredging by Karnataka. Clarification No. XIII Survey of Sedimentation by Tojo Vikas International Private Limited cost to be borne by Karnataka alone. Clarification No. XIV KWD-IB should implement the Real Time Flood Forecasting System in the entire Krishna basin to mitigate the flood situation. Page Nos. 81-139 81-84

2. 3.

85-87

4. 5.

88-89 89-92

6. 7.

93-95 95-105

8,

106-109

9.

110-114

10. 11. 12.

115-120 120-127 127-131

13.

131-135

14.

135-137

15.

137-139

viii

INDEX S.No. Particulars Chapter No. IV Reference No. 1 of 2011 (A.P.) Clarifications of Andhra Pradesh The length of series for assessing the yearly yield Section 4(1) Proviso : Series of 78 years settled issue. IS 5477 (Indian Standard): Fixing the capacity of Reservoir. Utilization in Minor Irrigation of Maharashtra Utilization in Minor Irrigation of Karnataka. Challenge to the yearly water series of 47 years. Page Nos. 140- 362

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

142-150 150-152 153-161 162-169 169-179 180-188

Series of 112 years prepared by Prof. Subhash Chandra should be 188-207 accepted. Indiscriminate increase in projects of Maharashtra and Karnataka 207-217 and oversized Reservoirs : Real and apprehended over utilization. The loss of storage of Tungabhadra Reservoir due to siltation. 217-223

9.

10. 11.

Non-consideration of projects of Andhra Pradesh in Tungabhadra 223-231 K-8 sub-basin. Height of Almatti Dam Success Rate. Percentage of dependability. 231-242 242-248 248-262

12. 13. 14. 15.

Re : Live Storage Capacity of Krishna basin and that of Srisailam 262-280 and Nagarjunasagar Reservoirs effect of Siltation. Built up Storage Capacity should have been based on Average 280-285 utilization of Ten years. Distribution of water at 50% dependability cannot be on the same 286-298 footing as dependable flows on equitable consideration. About Drought Prone Areas in Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. 298-303

16. 17. 18.

ix 19. 20. Inequitable Distribution. Allocation at different dependabilities Details of manner of drawal of water of respective share by States (Part-I of the Scheme) (Part-II of the Scheme) Power of the Tribunal to frame Scheme constituting Implementation Board Section 6A of ISRWD Act 1956. INDEX S.No. 1. Particulars Chapter V Reference No. 4 of 2011 of Central Government Clarification of Para 1(a) Planning of Projects and allocation of water Clarification of Para 1(b) About sharing of water in lesser yield. Clarification of Para 1(c ) Suggested system of drawal of water. Clarification of Para 1(e) For extending time to nominate members of KWD-IB Clarification of Para 1(f)Discrepancy in figures of utilization in Minor Irrigation of Maharashtra. Conclusion. Page Nos. 363-376 304-307 307-338 338-343 343-348 348-362

21.

2.

363-368

3.

369-370

4.

370-371

5.

371

6.

371-374

7.

374-376

INDEX S.No. 1. Particulars Schedule-I of Further Report List of explanations and clarifications consequential deemed amendments. Page Nos. made and 377-397

2.

Schedule-II Order as to be finally read after incorporating the deemed amendments in the Order and the Appendix-1 of Decision dated December 30, 2010.

398-446