Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

No CFR Regulation for 12 USC 411

Originally Posted by doug555

Lawful Money is Equitable Title to Labor-Credit Asset. EXACTLY... The forgiving is the for-giving (pre-PAYMENT) of labor as the credit of the Nation en-trusted to the Government-Usufructuaries-Trustees! The Estate re-vests upon Infant Proof of Life, and at that point the Living Beneficiary appears and the Trustees must perform said lawful money requests. Usufructuary must give Security (Surety) to Owner to indemnify him/her. Said Surety is the Certificate of Live Birth (COLB), given as a receipt for our indemnification. My Proof of Life now requires the Trustee to perform said indemnification, for example, honoring "EQUITABLE TITLE TRANSFERS" for true PAYMENT of debts/charges to COLB NAME account! P.S. USUFRUCT and The Parable of the Landowner (Mt 21.33-41) adds the spiritual dimension to this "calling"... Notice that there is no corresponding CFR regulation to restrict anyone's method of demanding lawful money. I think that is VERY significant. The Parallel Table of Authorities has no entry for 12 USC 411. This table's entries go in sequence from 12 USC section 391 to section 418. Section 411 is missing. This is confirmed at http://www.gpo.gov/help/parallel_table.txt, excerpted below: [Code of Federal Regulations] [Parallel Table] [Revised as of January 1, 2011] [From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access] PARALLEL TABLE OF AUTHORITIES AND RULES 12 U.S.C. <---------------------------> Corresponding C.F.R. ================================================== ===== 378............................................... .........12 Part 303 391....31 Parts 202, 203, 209, 210, 225, 240, 306, 317, 321, 341, 346, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 363, 375, 380 418............................................... .........31 Part 601 461........................................12 Parts 201, 204, 208, 217 Therefore it is legitimate and preferable to make one's demand TRANSACTION-BASED, for example: "lawful money and full discharge is demanded for all transactions 12 USC 411 and 95a(2)" *** IMPORTANT *** Using this exact wording enables one to provide probable cause and justification for listing all transactions on the 1040 SUPPORTING SCHEDULE that have been presumed to be using FRNs!!! See more info at 1040 Help post where this post has also been added and highlighted as *** I M P O R T A N T ***. Who can rebut that demand? And by what authority? Even in their fiction fraud system.

One does not need to put it on any specific document or in any particular wording or even on every commercial transaction. One does NOT need to put it on any bank signature card, or on any contract. Just decide on the date one wants to begin the demand and then start hand-writing it on the face of one's checks and deposit slips, just under one's name and address in the upper lefthand corner of the document. This then stands as nunc pro tunc thereafter and forever as substantive evidence per FRCP 803(6) and is unrebuttable. This is the starting date of one's FREEDOM. Make it memorable!!
Last edited by doug555; 07-27-13 at 03:17 PM.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen