State-Level Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2000-2010

State-Level Energy-Related
Carbon Dioxide Emissions,

2000-2010
May2013
Independent Statistics & Analysis

www.eia.gov
U.S.DepartmentofEnergy
Washington,DC20585
ThisreportwaspreparedbytheU.S.EnergyInformationAdministration(EIA),thestatisticaland
analyticalagencywithintheU.S.DepartmentofEnergy.Bylaw,EIAsdata,analyses,andforecastsare
independentofapprovalbyanyotherofficeroremployeeoftheUnitedStatesGovernment.Theviews
inthisreportthereforeshouldnotbeconstruedasrepresentingthoseoftheDepartmentofEnergyor
otherFederalagencies.
U.S.EnergyInformationAdministration|StateLevelEnergyRelatedCarbonDioxideEmissions,20002010
ii
May2013
Table of Contents
Overview..................................................................................................................................................1
Totalstateemissionlevels.......................................................................................................................1
Emissionsbyfuel.....................................................................................................................................2
Emissionsbysector..................................................................................................................................2
Percapitacarbondioxideemissions.......................................................................................................2
Energyintensity.......................................................................................................................................3
Carbonintensityoftheenergysupply.....................................................................................................4
Carbonintensityoftheeconomy............................................................................................................4
Electricitytrade........................................................................................................................................4
AppendixA.ComparisonoffueldetailfortheStateEnergyDataSystemandtheAnnualandMonthly
EnergyReviewdatasystems.................................................................................................................15
iii
May2013
Tables
Table1.Stateenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbyyear(20002010)...........................................6
Table2.2010stateenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbyfuel.........................................................7
Table3.2010stateenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbysector.....................................................8
Table4.2010stateenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsharesbysector............................................9
Table5.Percapitaenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbystate(20002010)................................10
Table6.Energyintensitybystate(20002010).......................................................................................11
Table7.Carbonintensityoftheenergysupplybystate(20002010).....................................................12
Table8.Carbonintensityoftheeconomybystate(20002010).............................................................13
Table9.Netelectricitytradeindexandprimaryelectricitysourceforselectedstates(20002010)......14
iv
May2013
Figures
Figure1.Energyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbystate,2010..............................................................1
Figure2.Percapitaenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbystate,2010.............................................3
May2013
Overview
Energyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsvarysignificantlyacrossstates(Figure1),whetherconsidered
onanabsoluteorpercapitabasis.Theoverallsizeofastate,aswellastheavailablefuels,typesof
businesses,climate,andpopulationdensity,playaroleinbothtotalandpercapitaemissions.
Additionally,eachstatesenergysystemreflectscircumstancesspecifictothatstate.Forexample,
somestatesarelocatednearabundanthydroelectricsupplies,whileotherscontainabundantcoal
resources.Thispaperpresentsabasicanalysisofthefactorsthatcontributetoastatescarbondioxide
profile.Thisanalysisneitherattemptstoassesstheeffectofstatepoliciesonabsoluteemissionslevels
oronchangesovertime,nordoesitintendtoimplythatcertainpolicieswouldbeappropriatefora
particularstate.
Thetermenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsasusedinthispaper,includesemissionsreleased
atthelocationwherefossilfuelsareused.Forfeedstockapplication,carbonstoredinproductssuchas
plasticsarenotincludedinreportedemissionsforthestateswheretheyareproduced.
Itisalsoimportanttorecognizethatthestatelevelcarbondioxideemissionsdatapresentedinthis
papercountemissionsbasedonthelocationwheretheenergyisconsumedasafuel.Totheextentthat
fuelsareusedinonestatetogenerateelectricitythatisconsumedinanotherstate,emissionsare
attributedtotheformerratherthanthelatter.Ananalysisthatattributedresponsibilityforemissions
withconsumptionratherthanproductionofelectricity,whichisbeyondthescopeofthepresentpaper,
wouldyielddifferentresults.
Totalstateemissionlevels
Overthetimeperiodfrom2000to2010,carbondioxideemissionsfellin32statesandrosein18states
(Table1).ThegreatestpercentagedecreaseincarbondioxideemissionsoccurredinDelawareat27.9
percent,(4.5millionmetrictons).Thegreatestabsolutedeclinewas58.8millionmetrictonsinTexas
(8.3percent).NewYorkexperiencedadeclineof38.6millionmetrictons(18.3percent).Thegreatest
percentageincreasewasinNebraskaat16.0percent(6.6millionmetrictons),whileColorado
experiencedthegreatestabsoluteincrease(11.8millionmetrictonsor13.9percent).
Figure1.Energyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbystate,2010
millionmetrictonscarbondioxide
May2013
From2009to2010,only14statessawadecreaseinemissions.TheUnitedStateswasreboundingfrom
therecessionandemissionsfromconsumptionofenergywasupinmoststates.Becauseofdifferences
indataaggregationsitisdifficulttocomparethetotalforallstateswiththetotalfortheUnitedStates.
SeetheAppendixforacomparisonoflevelsofdatadetailbetweenthestateandnationaldatasystems.
Emissionsbyfuel
Statesexhibitverydifferentemissionsprofilesbyfueltype(Table2).Forexample,in2010,coal
consumptionaccountedfor80.8percentofcarbondioxideemissionsinWestVirginia.InCalifornia,
65.2percentofcarbondioxideemissionscamefrompetroleum,whileonly1.4percentcamefromcoal.
RhodeIslandhadnoemissionsfromcoalconsumption,but46.1percentofitsemissionswerefrom
naturalgas.Vermontsshareofcarbondioxideemissionsfrompetroleumwas92.5percentand
Hawaiissharewas91.4percentin2010.Nootherstatesexceeded80percentintermsoftheshareof
emissionsfrompetroleum;Mainespetroleumsharewas75.6percent.
Emissionsbysector
Therecanalsobesignificantvariationsintermsofcarbondioxideemissionsbysector(Tables3and4)
evenforstatesthathavesimilarfuelemissionsprofiles.Thesevariationsareduetofactorssuchasthe
useofdifferentfuelsforelectricitygeneration,climate,andsourcesofeconomicoutputs(e.g.,
commercialversusindustrialactivity).Forexample,inVermontthelargestshareofemissionsin2010
camefromthetransportationsector(58.7percent),predominantlyfrompetroleum,buttheelectric
powersectorshareissmall(0.1percent)becauseofVermontsrelianceonnuclearpower.Vermonts
residentialsectorsharewas22.1percentindicativeofarelativelycoldclimatewherepetroleumisthe
mainheatingfuel.Hawaii,whereadominantshareofemissionsisalsofrompetroleum,hasa
residentialshareof0.3percentthelowestintheUnitedStatesbecauseofminimalheatingand
coolingrequirements.ThelargestsectoremissionsshareinHawaii,likeVermont,wasfromthe
transportationsector(49.3percent).However,unlikeVermont,Hawaiiselectricpowersectorshare
nearlyashigh(40.1percent).ThedominantfossilfuelforthegenerationofelectricityinHawaiiis
petroleum.
Percapitacarbondioxideemissions
Anotherusefulwaytocomparetotalcarbondioxideemissionsacrossstatesistodividethembystate
populationandexaminethemonapercapitabasis(Table5andFigure2).Manyfactorscontributeto
theamountofemissionspercapita,including:climate,thestructureofthestateeconomy,population
density,energysources,buildingstandardsandexplicitstatepoliciestoreduceemissions.The2010
carbondioxideemissionsinWyomingwere118.5metrictonspercapita,thehighestintheUnited
States.In2010,WyomingwasthesecondlargestenergyproducerintheUnitedStates.Unlikethe
largestenergyproducer,Texas,thathasapopulationof25million,Wyominghaslessthan600thousand
peoplegivingWyomingthelowestpopulationdensityinthelower48states.1Itswintersarecold(the
averagelowtemperaturesinJanuaryareinthe5to10degreeFahrenheitrange2).Thesefactorsactto
raiseWyomingspercapitaemissionscomparedtootherstates.Thesecondhigheststatepercapita
carbondioxideemissionslevelwasNorthDakotaat80.4metrictonspercapita.Alaska(54.6metric
tonspercapita),WestVirginia(54.2metrictonspercapita)andLouisiana(49.3metrictonspercapita)
1
2
U.S.EnergyInformationAdministration,StateProfilesandEnergyEstimates:http://www.eia.gov/state/
http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/narratives/WYOMING.htm
May2013
roundoutthetopfivestatesintermsofpercapitacarbondioxideemissions.Allofthesearefossil
energyproducingstates.Theactivityofproducingenergyisitselfenergyintensive.
Figure2.Percapitaenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbystate,2010
metrictonscarbondioxideperperson
TheStateofNewYork,withapopulationof19.6millionpeople,hadthelowestpercapitacarbon
dioxideemissions8.8metrictonspercapita.AlargeportionofthepopulationislocatedintheNew
YorkCitymetropolitanareawheremasstransitisreadilyavailableandmostresidencesaremultifamily
unitsthatprovideefficienciesofscaleintermsofenergyforheatingandcooling.TheNewYork
economyisorientedtowardshighvalue,lowenergyconsumingactivitiessuchasfinancialmarkets.For
example,in2010NewYorkcontained6.3percentoftheU.S.population,butconsumedonly1.1percent
ofthecountrysindustrialenergy.3NewYorksenergypricesarerelativelyhigh(theaverageretail
electricitypriceof16.41centsperkWhwasthirdhighestinthecountryin2010),whichinturn
encouragesenergysavings.4Thesecondlowestpercapitacarbonemittingstate(9.7metrictonsper
capita)wasVermont.Asmentionedabove,Vermonthadalmostnoemissionsfromitselectricpower
sector.Otherstateswithrelativelylowpercapitaemissionsratesinclude:California(9.9metrictons
percapita),IdahoandOregon(both10.4metrictonspercapita).
Energyintensity
Theenergyintensityofastate,asmeasuredbytheamountofenergyconsumedperunitofeconomic
outputor,specifically,Britishthermalunitsperdollarofastatesgrossdomesticproduct(Btu/GDP),
playsanimportantroleinitsoverallemissionsprofile(Table6).Thestateswiththehighestratesof
emissionspercapitain2010alsohadthehigherenergyintensityvalues:Wyoming(24.6thousandBtu
perdollar),NorthDakota(22.8thousandBtuperdollar)andWestVirginia(21.6thousandBtuper
dollar).Delawarehadthelowestenergyintensity(3.3thousandBtuperdollar),followedbyNewYork
(3.5thousandBtuperdollar),Massachusetts,andConnecticut(both3.7thousandBtuperdollar).With
U.S.EnergyInformationAdministration,StateEnergyData2010,statepopulationandenergyconsumptionbysector.
U.S.EnergyInformationAdministration,StateElectricityProfiles,Table1,2010SummaryStatistics
http://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/newyork/pdf/New_York.pdf
May2013
theexceptionsofCaliforniaandHawaii,thestateswiththelowestenergyintensityareclusteredinthe
relativelydenselypopulatedNewEnglandandCentralAtlantic.The2010nationalaverageis7.5
thousandBtuperdollarofGDP.
Carbonintensityoftheenergysupply
Thecarbonintensityofenergysupply(CO2/Btu)isreflectiveoftheenergyfuelmixwithinastate.As
withenergyintensity,thestateswithhighcarbonintensityofenergysupplytendtobethestateswith
highpercapitaemissions.Thetopfivestatesin2010fortheenergycarbonintensityasmeasuredin
kilogramsofcarbondioxidepermillionBtu(kgCO2/MMBtu)WestVirginia(81.7kgCO2/MMBtu),
Kentucky(77.2kgCO2/MMBtu),Wyoming(76.8kgCO2/MMBtu),Indiana(75.1kgCO2/MMBtu),and
NorthDakota(73.6kgCO2/MMBtu)areallstateswithcoalasthedominantfuel(Table7).The
nationalaveragecarbonintensityoftheenergysupplyin2010was57.6kgCO2/MMBtu.Thestateswith
lowercarbonintensitytendtobethosestateswithrelativelysubstantialnoncarbonelectricity
generationsuchashydropowerornuclear.Thesestatesinclude,forexample,Vermont(34.5kg
CO2/MMBtu),Washington(37.4kgCO2/MMBtu),Oregon(39.1kgCO2/MMBtu),Idaho(41.2kg
CO2/MMBtu)andNewHampshire(41.5kgCO2/MMBtu).
Carbonintensityoftheeconomy
Anothermeasure,theoverallcarbonintensityoftheeconomy(CO2/dollarofstateGDP),combines
energyintensitywiththecarbonintensityofthatenergysupply.Asonewouldexpect,thestateswith
thehighestcarbonintensityoftheireconomies(Table8)asmeasuredinmetrictonsofcarbondioxide
permilliondollarsofstateGDP(mtCO2/milliondollarsofGDP)arealsothestateswiththehighest
valuesofenergyintensityandcarbonintensityofthatenergysupply.In2010thesestatesincluded:
Wyoming(1,886mtCO2/milliondollarsofGDP),WestVirginia(1,767mtCO2/milliondollarsofGDP)
NorthDakota(1,681mtCO2/milliondollarsofGDP),Louisiana(1,145mtCO2/milliondollarsofGDP),
andMontana(1,098mtCO2/milliondollarsofGDP).The2010U.S.averageis430mtCO2/million
dollarsofGDP.Thestateswiththelowestcarbonintensityofeconomicactivityarealsostatesthat
appearonthelowerendofbothenergyintensityandthecarbonintensityofthatenergysupply.These
statesinclude:NewYork(167mtCO2/milliondollarsofGDP),Connecticut(175mtCO2/milliondollars
ofGDP),Delaware(209mtCO2/milliondollarsofGDP),Massachusetts(213mtCO2/milliondollarsof
GDP),andCalifornia(214mtCO2/milliondollarsofGDP).
Electricitytrade
Becausethisanalysisdoesnotaccountforelectricitytrade,itisimportanttounderstandhowmuchthis
caninfluenceastatescarbondioxideemissionsprofile.TheNetElectricityTradeIndex(Table9)
indicateswhetherastateisselfsufficientinthegenerationofelectricityinagivenyear(avalueof1.0);
isanetimporterofelectricityinagivenyear(avalueoflessthan1.0);orisanetexporterofelectricity
inagivenyear(avaluegreaterthan1.0).AsindicatedinTable9,overhalfofthe10stateswiththe
highestpercapitaemissionsthestatesarenetexportersofelectricityinatleastsomeyears.In
particular,Wyoming,NorthDakota,WestVirginiaandMontanaarelargeelectricityexportersofpower
producedpredominantlywithcoal.NewMexicoisalsoanetexporterofelectricity.Oklahomaisanet
exporter,butitsdominantfuelisnaturalgas.Indianaisasmallexporterinsomeyears,butwasexport
neutralin2009and2010.Kentucky,likeIndianaisacoalfueledgenerationstate,buthasbeenexport
May2013
neutralinrecentyears.Louisiana,theonlystateofhighpercapitaemittersthatisconsistentlyanet
importerofelectricity,andAlaskaastatethatisanimporterinsomeyears,butexportneutralinmost,
arebothfossilfuelproducingstateswithalargeenergyintensivecomponentoftheireconomies.
Fourofthetenstateswiththelowestpercapitacarbondioxideemissionsareconsistentimportersof
electricity:Idaho,California,Massachusetts,andFlorida.RhodeIslandwasanelectricityexporterin
2001andwasselfsufficientin2000,2008,2009,and2010.IntheotheryearsRhodeIslandwasan
importerofelectricity(about40percentin2004).Idahogeneratesitselectricityprincipallywith
hydroelectricpowerandhashistoricallyimported50percentormoreofitselectricityfromotherstates.
Californiaconsistentlyimportsabout30percentofitselectricityandnaturalgasisthedominantfuelfor
theelectricitythatitgeneratesinternally.BothMassachusettsandFloridaalsousenaturalgasasthe
dominantfuelforelectricitygeneration.
NewYork,whichisselfsufficientmanyyearsandaslightimporterinotheryears,generatesadominant
shareofitselectricitywithnuclearpower.Vermont,whichisaconsistentexporterofelectricity,isalso
astatedominatedbynuclearpowergeneration.Connecticut,alsoanuclearpowerproducer,isaslight
exporterinsomeyears,animporterinothersandselfsufficientinyetothers.BothOregonand
Washingtonareusuallyeitherselfsufficientornetexporters.However,in2001,whichwasa
particularlybadyearforhydroelectricgenerationinthePacificNorthwest,bothstateswerenet
importersofelectricity.
Iftheemissionsassociatedwiththegenerationofelectricitywereallocatedtothestateswherethat
electricityisconsumed,inmanycases,theemissionsprofilesofboththeproducingandconsuming
stateswouldchange.
May2013
Table1.Stateenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbyyear(20002010)
Change
2000to2010
Percent Absolute
State
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Alabama
140.4
132.0
136.7
137.2
139.7
141.5
144.0
146.1
139.2
119.8
132.7
5.5%
7.7
Alaska
44.3
43.4
43.6
43.5
46.8
48.1
45.8
44.1
39.5
37.9
38.7
12.6%
5.6
Arizona
86.0
88.3
87.7
89.3
96.6
96.7
100.0
102.2
103.1
94.6
95.9
11.6%
9.9
Arkansas
63.2
62.4
60.9
61.3
61.9
59.7
61.6
63.1
63.7
61.6
66.1
4.6%
2.9
California
381.3
385.8
384.9
389.5
391.5
389.0
397.5
403.7
389.8
375.9
369.8
3.0%
11.4
Colorado
84.7
92.8
90.9
90.0
93.1
95.4
96.4
99.2
97.6
93.7
96.5
13.9%
11.8
Connecticut
42.8
41.5
39.9
42.3
44.4
43.9
40.9
40.3
38.2
36.5
36.9
13.7%
5.8
Delaware
16.3
15.7
15.5
16.1
16.1
17.0
15.8
16.7
15.9
11.8
11.7
27.9%
4.5
4.3
4.1
4.2
3.9
4.0
3.9
3.2
3.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
23.6%
1.0
Florida
239.2
238.1
241.3
244.9
257.3
260.9
259.5
257.8
240.2
226.3
246.0
2.8%
6.7
Georgia
167.9
160.3
165.1
167.5
173.3
183.9
181.5
184.6
173.5
163.4
173.7
3.4%
5.8
Hawaii
18.8
19.2
20.5
21.5
22.6
23.2
23.5
24.4
19.7
18.9
18.9
0.7%
0.1
DistrictofColumbia
Idaho
15.6
15.5
14.9
14.2
15.5
15.7
15.8
16.3
15.8
15.4
16.2
4.0%
0.6
Illinois
232.1
223.1
225.1
227.7
235.2
242.0
233.9
242.1
240.7
226.1
230.4
0.7%
1.7
Indiana
238.2
228.6
231.7
236.9
237.8
236.7
235.0
234.7
231.5
208.5
219.1
8.0%
19.1
Iowa
77.7
76.6
77.2
76.4
78.9
78.9
80.2
85.7
88.3
83.8
88.7
14.1%
11.0
Kansas
76.1
71.8
76.6
78.4
75.8
72.0
72.1
80.1
76.9
75.0
75.0
1.3%
1.0
Kentucky
144.7
148.1
148.3
143.9
150.9
153.2
156.1
156.4
153.7
143.7
150.7
4.2%
6.1
Louisiana
239.9
211.9
219.8
214.6
226.2
221.7
236.0
234.5
221.7
203.9
223.5
6.8%
16.4
Maine
22.3
22.4
24.0
23.4
24.0
23.1
21.3
21.0
19.4
18.6
18.5
17.1%
3.8
Maryland
77.5
78.0
77.9
80.4
82.0
83.9
77.5
78.1
74.7
71.4
70.5
9.0%
7.0
Massachusetts
82.2
82.1
82.9
83.8
82.6
84.3
76.4
80.0
77.2
71.0
73.0
11.2%
9.2
192.6
188.5
187.9
184.7
187.4
189.3
178.2
181.2
175.2
164.4
165.9
13.9%
26.7
4.3
Michigan
Minnesota
97.7
94.7
97.3
101.0
100.6
101.7
99.1
100.9
100.6
93.1
93.4
4.4%
Mississippi
60.6
69.4
61.9
63.2
64.8
63.2
65.4
67.7
64.1
60.4
65.5
8.0%
4.9
Missouri
125.4
131.1
131.8
138.3
140.0
143.0
141.6
140.8
137.9
131.6
135.7
8.2%
10.3
Montana
31.3
31.9
30.7
32.7
34.5
35.5
35.8
37.8
36.1
32.5
34.9
11.4%
3.6
Nebraska
41.4
42.7
42.2
43.0
43.1
43.5
44.1
44.5
46.5
46.8
48.0
16.0%
6.6
Nevada
45.3
44.6
41.4
43.4
47.7
49.8
41.5
41.8
41.2
39.7
38.1
15.9%
7.2
NewHampshire
NewJersey
NewMexico
17.5
16.9
17.6
20.8
21.9
21.3
19.4
19.3
19.1
17.3
17.0
2.8%
0.5
121.1
118.5
118.9
119.8
122.6
127.6
120.2
128.6
124.3
110.4
115.4
4.7%
5.7
58.0
58.2
55.2
57.3
58.5
59.1
59.9
59.1
57.6
58.5
54.8
5.5%
3.2
NewYork
211.4
206.7
200.8
210.1
213.9
210.7
192.5
199.4
190.5
175.5
172.8
18.3%
38.6
NorthCarolina
147.7
143.1
144.3
144.7
148.2
152.7
147.4
153.6
149.0
132.9
142.9
3.3%
4.8
NorthDakota
50.8
51.7
51.4
50.9
49.5
52.4
50.8
52.6
53.1
51.4
52.5
3.3%
1.7
Ohio
264.0
254.5
260.3
267.4
262.5
269.7
263.0
268.9
261.9
237.6
249.1
5.6%
14.9
Oklahoma
100.1
101.4
101.6
103.5
99.8
106.9
110.2
109.6
113.1
104.9
103.4
3.4%
3.4
41.2
40.6
39.1
39.3
40.6
41.0
40.3
43.8
43.2
41.2
40.3
2.4%
1.0
Pennsylvania
276.3
263.4
270.1
273.0
276.6
280.0
274.1
277.6
264.9
246.0
256.6
7.1%
19.7
RhodeIsland
11.6
12.1
11.6
11.3
10.8
11.0
10.4
11.0
10.6
11.3
11.0
4.8%
0.6
SouthCarolina
79.3
78.0
79.2
79.5
87.1
85.7
86.4
87.0
85.5
80.7
84.0
5.9%
4.7
SouthDakota
14.1
13.4
13.7
13.6
13.7
13.2
13.3
13.9
15.1
14.9
15.1
7.3%
1.0
Tennessee
125.2
124.2
123.2
120.9
123.0
124.6
127.0
126.7
120.3
100.3
107.1
14.5%
18.1
Texas
711.3
704.1
715.8
706.4
709.7
677.8
675.2
676.7
653.3
624.9
652.6
8.3%
58.8
Utah
65.1
62.9
62.1
62.7
65.3
67.0
68.3
70.4
69.9
65.0
64.2
1.3%
0.9
6.8
6.6
6.4
6.5
7.0
6.8
6.7
6.6
6.1
6.3
6.0
10.8%
0.7
122.3
120.0
118.5
122.2
126.5
128.5
122.0
127.7
117.4
106.3
109.8
10.2%
12.5
Oregon
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
82.8
79.4
72.8
74.5
76.7
78.3
76.3
81.8
79.6
77.5
76.1
8.1%
6.7
WestVirginia
113.4
103.5
116.2
112.5
109.8
111.9
112.2
114.6
110.6
89.1
98.9
12.7%
14.4
Wisconsin
107.5
105.5
106.7
104.3
107.1
110.5
102.7
104.7
105.7
96.7
99.2
7.7%
8.3
Wyoming
62.7
63.0
61.7
63.4
63.4
62.8
63.7
66.1
66.8
63.7
64.9
3.5%
2.2
5,879.9
5,772.4
5,810.0
5,857.5
5,968.8
6,000.4
5,921.6
6,029.0
5,842.9
5,441.8
5,631.3
4.2%
248.6
Total
FortheUni tedSta tes a s a countrys ee,EIA,Monthl yEnergyRevi ew,Secti on12:Envi ronment.Di fferi ngmethodol ogi es betweenthetwoda ta s eri es ca us es
thetota l fora l l s ta tes tobes l i ghtl ydi fferentfromthena ti ona l l evel es ti ma te.Thea mountva ri es nomoretha n0.5percent.SeeAppendi xAfordeta i l s on
theda ta s eri es di fferences .
Source:U.S.EnergyInforma ti onAdmi ni s tra ti on(EIA),Sta teEnergyDa ta Sys tema ndEIAca l cul a ti ons ma deforthi s a na l ys i s .
Note:TheDi s tri ctofCol umbi a i s i ncl udedi ntheda ta ta bl es ,butnoti nthea na l ys i s a s i ti s nota s ta te.
May2013
Table2.2010stateenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbyfuel
State
Coal
Petroleum
NaturalGas
Total
Coal
Shares
Petroleum
Al a ba ma
67.8
36.0
29.0
132.7
51.1%
27.1%
21.8%
Al a s ka
1.4
19.6
17.8
38.7
3.5%
50.6%
45.9%
Ari zona
43.2
34.8
17.9
95.9
45.1%
36.3%
18.6%
Arka ns a s
27.7
23.8
14.6
66.1
41.9%
36.0%
22.0%
Ca l i forni a
5.2
241.3
123.4
369.8
1.4%
65.2%
33.4%
Col ora do
NaturalGas
36.1
33.5
26.8
96.5
37.4%
34.7%
27.8%
Connecti cut
2.7
23.4
10.8
36.9
7.3%
63.4%
29.3%
Del a wa re
2.9
5.9
3.0
11.7
24.3%
50.4%
25.3%
Di s tri ctofCol umbi a
0.0
1.5
1.8
3.3
0.2%
45.2%
54.6%
Fl ori da
60.2
123.2
62.6
246.0
24.5%
50.1%
25.5%
Georgi a
72.5
72.5
28.7
173.7
41.7%
41.8%
16.5%
Ha wa i i
1.6
17.3
0.0
18.9
8.5%
91.4%
0.0%
Ida ho
0.8
10.9
4.5
16.2
4.9%
67.2%
27.8%
Il l i noi s
100.9
79.9
49.6
230.4
43.8%
34.7%
21.5%
Indi a na
136.8
52.3
30.0
219.1
62.4%
23.9%
13.7%
Iowa
46.6
27.4
14.8
88.7
52.5%
30.9%
16.7%
Ka ns a s
34.0
25.8
15.3
75.0
45.3%
34.3%
20.4%
Kentucky
95.3
42.8
12.6
150.7
63.2%
28.4%
8.4%
Loui s i a na
24.4
121.4
77.7
223.5
10.9%
54.3%
34.8%
Ma i ne
Ma ryl a nd
Ma s s a chus etts
0.2
14.0
4.3
18.5
1.2%
75.6%
23.2%
25.1
34.1
11.3
70.5
35.6%
48.3%
16.1%
32.4%
7.9
41.4
23.6
73.0
10.8%
56.8%
Mi chi ga n
70.7
54.9
40.2
165.9
42.6%
33.1%
24.2%
Mi nnes ota
29.8
41.0
22.7
93.4
31.9%
43.9%
24.2%
Mi s s i s s i ppi
14.0
28.2
23.2
65.5
21.4%
43.1%
35.5%
Mi s s ouri
75.7
45.1
15.0
135.7
55.8%
33.2%
11.0%
Monta na
19.2
11.8
3.9
34.9
55.0%
33.9%
11.1%
Nebra s ka
24.0
15.0
9.0
48.0
50.1%
31.2%
18.7%
Neva da
7.6
16.3
14.2
38.1
19.9%
42.8%
37.3%
NewHa mps hi re
3.2
10.5
3.3
17.0
18.8%
61.6%
19.6%
NewJers ey
6.8
73.2
35.5
115.4
5.8%
63.4%
30.7%
NewMexi co
25.3
16.5
13.1
54.8
46.1%
30.1%
23.8%
NewYork
15.8
92.2
64.9
172.8
9.1%
53.3%
37.6%
NorthCa rol i na
70.7
55.8
16.3
142.9
49.5%
39.1%
11.4%
NorthDa kota
Ohi o
Okl a homa
38.6
10.5
3.4
52.5
73.5%
20.0%
6.5%
127.9
78.3
42.9
249.1
51.4%
31.4%
17.2%
32.7
33.8
37.0
103.4
31.6%
32.7%
35.8%
4.0
23.4
12.9
40.3
10.0%
58.0%
32.0%
Penns yl va ni a
123.7
85.7
47.1
256.6
48.2%
33.4%
18.4%
RhodeIs l a nd
0.0
5.9
5.1
11.0
0.0%
53.9%
46.1%
SouthCa rol i na
38.2
33.9
11.9
84.0
45.5%
40.4%
14.2%
SouthDa kota
3.7
7.6
3.8
15.1
24.4%
50.5%
25.2%
48.6
44.8
13.7
107.1
45.4%
41.8%
12.8%
Texa s
151.6
318.0
183.0
652.6
23.2%
48.7%
28.0%
Uta h
33.6
18.5
12.1
64.2
52.3%
28.7%
18.9%
Vermont
0.0
5.6
0.5
6.0
0.0%
92.5%
7.5%
Vi rgi ni a
32.6
56.7
20.4
109.8
29.7%
51.7%
18.6%
20.5%
Oregon
Tennes s ee
Wa s hi ngton
9.0
51.5
15.6
76.1
11.8%
67.7%
Wes tVi rgi ni a
80.0
12.5
6.4
98.9
80.8%
12.7%
6.5%
Wi s cons i n
43.3
36.0
20.0
99.2
43.6%
36.3%
20.1%
Wyomi ng
Tota l
45.7
11.3
7.9
64.9
70.4%
17.4%
12.1%
1,969.0
2,377.2
1,285.0
5,631.3
35.0%
42.2%
22.8%
FortheUni tedSta tes a s a countrys ee,EIA,Monthl yEnergyRevi ew,Secti on12:Envi ronment.Di fferi ngmethodol ogi es betweenthetwoda ta s eri es ca us es thetota l fora l l
s ta tes tobes l i ghtl ydi fferentfromthena ti ona l l evel es ti ma te.Thea mountva ri es nomoretha n0.5percent.SeeAppendi xAfordeta i l s ontheda ta s eri es di fferences .
May2013
Table3.2010stateenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbysector
million metric tons carbon dioxide
State
Al a ba ma
Commercial
ElectricPower
Residential
Industrial
Transportation
Total
2.1
76.7
2.8
17.7
33.4
132.7
Al a s ka
2.5
3.0
1.8
16.6
14.8
38.7
Ari zona
2.4
54.4
2.3
4.8
32.1
95.9
Arka ns a s
2.6
32.3
2.3
8.6
20.3
66.1
Ca l i forni a
15.9
43.5
28.9
67.5
214.0
369.8
Col ora do
4.2
39.9
7.8
14.9
29.7
96.5
Connecti cut
3.4
7.7
7.7
1.9
16.2
36.9
Del a wa re
0.8
4.2
1.1
1.1
4.5
11.7
Di s trictofCol umbi a
1.2
0.2
0.8
0.0
1.1
3.3
Fl ori da
5.4
119.6
1.6
12.4
107.0
246.0
Georgi a
4.0
79.1
8.3
14.5
67.8
173.7
Ha wa i i
0.3
7.6
0.1
1.7
9.3
18.9
Ida ho
1.1
0.7
1.6
3.4
9.4
16.2
Il l i noi s
11.5
94.0
23.7
33.9
67.2
230.4
Indi a na
5.4
114.3
8.7
48.5
42.2
219.1
Iowa
4.1
40.6
4.5
18.0
21.6
88.7
Ka ns a s
2.0
35.4
4.5
15.1
18.0
75.0
Kentucky
2.4
94.2
3.7
18.0
32.4
150.7
Loui s i a na
1.9
42.6
2.6
128.1
48.2
223.5
Ma i ne
1.8
2.6
2.7
2.9
8.6
18.5
Ma ryla nd
5.0
24.9
6.6
4.2
29.8
70.5
Ma s s a chus etts
6.8
18.2
13.7
3.4
30.8
73.0
Mi chiga n
9.4
70.4
19.0
17.4
49.7
165.9
Mi nnes ota
5.7
29.3
8.3
17.3
32.7
93.4
Mi s s is s i ppi
1.5
26.4
2.0
10.4
25.2
65.5
Mi s s ouri
4.1
76.0
7.0
9.3
39.4
135.7
Monta na
1.2
19.8
1.6
4.5
7.7
34.9
Nebra s ka
1.9
23.1
2.7
7.8
12.6
48.0
Neva da
1.8
16.8
2.4
2.7
14.3
38.1
NewHa mps hi re
NewJers ey
NewMexi co
NewYork
1.3
5.4
2.3
0.8
7.3
17.0
10.9
17.7
14.7
6.5
65.6
115.4
1.6
29.0
2.3
8.2
13.7
54.8
25.2
38.1
31.7
9.1
68.7
172.8
142.9
NorthCa rol ina
5.2
72.2
6.5
10.1
48.9
NorthDa kota
0.9
29.5
1.0
14.2
6.9
52.5
10.5
120.8
17.7
34.8
65.3
249.1
Okl a homa
2.7
47.4
4.1
20.7
28.5
103.4
Oregon
1.9
9.8
2.5
4.4
21.6
40.3
10.5
119.6
20.4
39.5
66.5
256.6
Ohi o
Penns yl va nia
RhodeIs l a nd
0.9
3.1
2.3
0.5
4.2
11.0
SouthCa rol i na
1.8
40.9
2.3
7.6
31.6
84.0
SouthDa kota
0.8
3.5
1.1
3.3
6.5
15.1
Tennes s ee
3.9
43.3
4.9
13.7
41.4
107.1
Texa s
12.2
220.4
13.7
211.4
194.9
652.6
Uta h
2.4
34.8
3.8
7.0
16.2
64.2
Vermont
0.6
0.0
1.3
0.5
3.5
6.0
Vi rgi ni a
5.0
34.3
7.2
12.6
50.7
109.8
Wa s hi ngton
3.8
13.1
5.1
12.0
42.1
76.1
Wes tVi rgi ni a
1.6
74.3
1.9
9.6
11.6
98.9
Wi s cons i n
5.2
42.6
8.6
12.6
30.2
99.2
Wyoming
1.0
42.8
0.9
11.8
8.4
64.9
222.3
2,240.0
337.1
957.8
1,874.1
5,631.3
Tota l
FortheUni tedSta tes a s a countrys ee,EIA,Monthl yEnergyRevi ew,Secti on12:Envi ronment.Di fferi ngmethodol ogi es betweenthetwoda ta s eries ca us es the
tota l fora ll s ta tes tobes l i ghtl ydi fferentfromthena ti ona l l evel es ti ma te.Thea mountva ri es nomoretha n0.5percent.SeeAppendi xAfordeta i l s onthe
da ta s eri es di fferences .
Note:TheDi s tri ctofCol umbi a i s incl udedi ntheda tata bl es ,butnotintheana l ys i s a s i tis nota s ta te.
May2013
Table4.2010stateenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsharesbysector
percentoftotal
Commercial
ElectricPower
Shares
Residential
Industrial
Transportation
Al a ba ma
1.6%
57.8%
2.1%
13.3%
25.1%
Al a s ka
6.4%
7.9%
4.6%
42.9%
38.2%
Ari zona
2.5%
56.7%
2.4%
5.0%
33.4%
Arka ns a s
3.9%
48.9%
3.5%
13.1%
30.7%
Ca l i forni a
4.3%
11.8%
7.8%
18.2%
57.9%
State
Col ora do
4.3%
41.3%
8.1%
15.5%
30.8%
Connecti cut
9.2%
20.8%
20.9%
5.2%
43.9%
Dela wa re
7.1%
36.0%
9.0%
9.1%
38.8%
35.5%
5.6%
25.2%
1.0%
32.7%
Fl ori da
2.2%
48.6%
0.7%
5.0%
43.5%
Georgi a
2.3%
45.5%
4.8%
8.3%
39.0%
Ha wa i i
1.3%
40.1%
0.3%
9.0%
49.3%
Ida ho
6.6%
4.1%
10.0%
21.0%
58.3%
Il l i noi s
5.0%
40.8%
10.3%
14.7%
29.2%
Indi a na
2.4%
52.2%
4.0%
22.1%
19.3%
Iowa
4.7%
45.7%
5.1%
20.2%
24.3%
Ka ns a s
2.7%
47.2%
6.0%
20.1%
24.0%
Kentucky
1.6%
62.5%
2.5%
11.9%
21.5%
Loui s i a na
0.9%
19.1%
1.2%
57.3%
21.6%
Ma i ne
9.6%
14.0%
14.6%
15.6%
46.3%
Ma ryl a nd
7.0%
35.3%
9.4%
5.9%
42.3%
Ma s s a chus etts
9.3%
24.9%
18.8%
4.7%
42.3%
Mi chi ga n
5.6%
42.4%
11.4%
10.5%
30.0%
Mi nnes ota
6.2%
31.4%
8.9%
18.6%
35.0%
Mi s s i s s i ppi
2.4%
40.3%
3.0%
15.9%
38.4%
Mi s s ouri
3.0%
56.0%
5.1%
6.9%
29.0%
Monta na
3.6%
56.8%
4.7%
13.0%
22.0%
Nebra s ka
3.9%
48.1%
5.6%
16.2%
26.2%
Neva da
4.8%
44.2%
6.2%
7.2%
37.6%
NewHa mps hi re
7.5%
31.8%
13.5%
4.5%
42.7%
NewJers ey
9.5%
15.4%
12.7%
5.6%
56.8%
NewMexi co
2.9%
52.9%
4.2%
15.0%
25.0%
NewYork
14.6%
22.0%
18.3%
5.3%
39.8%
NorthCa rol i na
3.6%
50.6%
4.5%
7.1%
34.2%
NorthDa kota
1.7%
56.2%
1.9%
27.0%
13.1%
Ohio
4.2%
48.5%
7.1%
14.0%
26.2%
Okl a homa
2.7%
45.8%
4.0%
20.0%
27.6%
Oregon
4.7%
24.2%
6.3%
11.0%
53.8%
Penns yl va ni a
4.1%
46.6%
8.0%
15.4%
25.9%
RhodeIs l a nd
8.5%
28.0%
20.5%
4.7%
38.4%
SouthCa rol i na
2.1%
48.6%
2.7%
9.0%
37.6%
SouthDa kota
5.2%
23.2%
7.0%
22.0%
42.7%
Tennes s ee
3.6%
40.4%
4.5%
12.7%
38.7%
Texa s
1.9%
33.8%
2.1%
32.4%
29.9%
Uta h
3.8%
54.1%
5.9%
10.9%
25.3%
Source:U.S.EnergyInforma ti onAdmi ni s tra ti on,Sta teEnergyDa ta Sys tema ndEIAca l cul a ti ons ma deforthi s a na l ys i s .
May2013
Table5.Percapitaenergyrelatedcarbondioxideemissionsbystate(20002010)
metrictonscarbondioxideperperson
State
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Change
2000to2010
Percent
Absolute
Al a ba ma
31.5
29.6
30.6
30.6
31.0
31.1
31.3
31.5
29.8
25.4
28.1
11.0%
3.5
Al a s ka
70.6
68.5
67.9
67.2
70.9
72.0
67.8
64.9
57.6
54.6
54.6
22.6%
16.0
Ari zona
16.6
16.7
16.1
16.0
16.8
16.2
16.2
16.1
15.9
14.4
14.4
13.7%
2.3
Arka ns a s
23.6
23.2
22.5
22.5
22.6
21.5
21.9
22.2
22.2
21.3
22.7
3.7%
0.9
Ca li fornia
11.2
11.2
11.0
11.1
11.0
10.9
11.1
11.2
10.7
10.2
9.9
11.5%
1.3
Colora do
19.6
20.9
20.2
19.8
20.3
20.5
20.3
20.5
19.8
18.7
18.9
3.2%
0.6
Connecticut
12.5
12.1
11.6
12.2
12.8
12.6
11.7
11.6
10.9
10.4
10.5
16.5%
2.1
Dela wa re
20.7
19.8
19.3
19.7
19.5
20.2
18.5
19.3
18.2
13.4
13.1
36.4%
7.5
7.5
7.1
7.2
6.8
6.9
6.7
5.5
5.8
5.3
5.3
5.4
28.5%
2.1
Fl ori da
14.9
14.6
14.5
14.4
14.8
14.7
14.4
14.1
13.0
12.2
13.2
11.7%
1.7
Georgi a
20.4
19.0
19.2
19.2
19.5
20.2
19.5
19.4
17.9
16.6
17.5
14.1%
2.9
Ha wa i i
15.5
15.8
16.7
17.5
18.1
18.4
18.5
19.2
15.4
14.7
14.5
6.1%
0.9
Ida ho
12.0
11.7
11.1
10.4
11.2
11.0
10.8
10.9
10.3
9.9
10.4
13.3%
1.6
Il li noi s
18.7
17.8
17.9
18.1
18.6
19.1
18.4
19.0
18.8
17.5
17.8
4.6%
0.9
Indi a na
39.1
37.3
37.7
38.3
38.3
37.9
37.3
37.0
36.2
32.5
34.0
13.1%
5.1
Iowa
26.6
26.1
26.3
26.0
26.8
26.7
27.1
28.7
29.5
27.8
29.4
10.6%
2.8
Ka ns a s
28.2
26.6
28.2
28.8
27.8
26.3
26.2
28.9
27.5
26.6
26.4
6.5%
1.8
1.0
Dis tri ctofColumbi a
Kentucky
35.7
36.4
36.3
34.9
36.4
36.6
37.0
36.8
35.8
33.3
34.7
2.8%
Loui s ia na
53.7
47.5
49.2
48.0
50.4
49.3
55.7
53.6
49.8
45.4
49.3
8.1%
4.3
Mai ne
17.5
17.5
18.5
18.0
18.4
17.6
16.2
16.0
14.8
14.1
14.1
19.3%
3.4
Maryl a nd
14.6
14.5
14.3
14.6
14.8
15.0
13.8
13.9
13.2
12.6
12.3
15.8%
2.3
Mas s a chus etts
12.9
12.8
12.9
13.0
12.8
13.1
11.8
12.3
11.8
10.8
11.0
14.8%
1.9
Michi ga n
19.3
18.8
18.7
18.3
18.6
18.8
17.7
18.0
17.5
16.5
16.7
13.7%
2.6
Minnes ota
19.8
19.0
19.4
20.0
19.8
19.9
19.3
19.4
19.2
17.7
17.7
10.8%
2.1
Mis s i s s i ppi
21.3
24.3
21.7
22.0
22.5
21.8
22.6
23.2
21.8
20.5
22.1
3.9%
0.8
Mis s ouri
22.4
23.2
23.2
24.2
24.3
24.6
24.2
23.8
23.2
22.0
22.6
0.9%
0.2
Monta na
34.7
35.2
33.7
35.6
37.2
38.0
37.8
39.5
37.3
33.4
35.6
2.6%
0.9
Nebra s ka
24.1
24.8
24.5
24.8
24.7
24.8
25.1
25.2
26.1
26.1
26.5
9.8%
2.4
Neva da
22.4
21.3
19.1
19.4
20.5
20.7
16.6
16.3
15.8
15.1
14.3
36.1%
8.1
NewHa mps hire
14.1
13.5
13.9
16.2
17.0
16.4
14.8
14.6
14.4
13.1
12.8
8.9%
1.3
NewJers ey
14.4
14.0
13.9
13.9
14.2
14.8
13.9
14.9
14.4
12.7
13.2
8.0%
1.2
NewMexi co
31.9
31.8
29.9
30.6
31.0
30.9
30.8
30.1
29.0
29.2
27.0
15.4%
4.9
NewYork
11.1
10.8
10.5
10.9
11.1
10.9
9.9
10.3
9.8
9.0
8.8
20.7%
2.3
NorthCa rol i na
18.3
17.4
17.4
17.2
17.4
17.6
16.6
17.0
16.1
14.2
15.1
17.4%
3.2
NorthDa kota
79.3
81.3
81.1
80.5
77.9
82.6
79.8
82.5
82.8
79.6
80.4
1.3%
1.1
Ohio
23.2
22.3
22.8
23.4
22.9
23.5
22.9
23.3
22.7
20.6
21.6
7.0%
1.6
Okl a homa
29.0
29.3
29.2
29.6
28.4
30.3
30.9
30.4
31.1
28.5
27.8
4.1%
1.2
Oregon
12.0
11.7
11.1
11.1
11.4
11.3
11.0
11.8
11.4
10.8
10.4
13.2%
1.6
Penns yl va ni a
22.5
21.4
21.9
22.1
22.3
22.6
22.0
22.2
21.1
19.5
20.3
9.7%
2.2
RhodeIs la nd
11.0
11.5
10.8
10.5
10.0
10.3
9.7
10.3
10.1
10.7
10.4
5.3%
0.6
SouthCa rol ina
19.7
19.2
19.3
19.2
20.8
20.2
19.9
19.7
19.0
17.7
18.3
7.3%
1.4
SouthDa kota
18.7
17.7
18.0
17.7
17.7
17.0
16.9
17.5
18.8
18.3
18.5
1.1%
0.2
Tennes s ee
22.0
21.6
21.2
20.6
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.5
19.3
15.9
16.9
23.0%
5.1
Texa s
34.0
33.0
33.0
32.0
31.7
29.7
28.9
28.4
26.9
25.2
25.9
23.8%
8.1
Uta h
29.0
27.5
26.6
26.4
26.8
26.8
26.4
26.4
25.7
23.4
22.7
21.8%
6.3
Vermont
11.1
10.8
10.3
10.6
11.4
11.0
10.8
10.6
9.9
10.2
9.7
12.6%
1.4
Vi rgi ni a
17.2
16.7
16.3
16.6
17.0
17.0
16.0
16.6
15.1
13.5
13.8
19.8%
3.4
Wa s hi ngton
14.0
13.3
12.0
12.2
12.4
12.5
12.0
12.7
12.1
11.6
11.3
19.4%
2.7
Wes tVi rgi ni a
62.8
57.6
64.6
62.4
60.9
62.0
62.1
63.2
60.9
48.9
54.2
13.6%
8.6
Wi s cons in
20.0
19.5
19.6
19.0
19.4
19.9
18.4
18.7
18.8
17.1
17.5
12.5%
2.5
Wyomi ng
127.0
127.8
124.2
127.1
126.1
124.1
124.2
126.4
125.5
117.0
118.5
6.7%
8.5
19.8
20.0
19.2
17.7
18.2
12.6%
2.6
Avera gea ll s ta tes

20.8
20.3
20.2
20.2
20.4
20.3
Note:TheDi s tri ctofCol umbi a i s i ncl udedi ntheda ta ta bl es ,butnoti nthea na lys i s a s i ti s nota s ta te.
Source:U.S.EnergyInforma ti onAdmi ni s tra ti on,StateEnergyDa ta Sys tema ndEIAca l cula ti ons ma deforthi s a na lys i s .
10
May2013
Table6.Energyintensitybystate(20002010)
thousandBtuperdollarofGDP
State
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Change
2000to2010
Percent Absolute
Al aba ma
18.3
17.1
17.4
17.2
16.9
16.4
16.3
16.2
15.9
15.3
16.0
12.6%
2.3
Al as ka
21.7
20.6
19.8
20.2
20.3
21.1
18.7
17.8
15.9
14.1
14.2
34.5%
7.5
Ari zona
8.7
8.5
8.4
8.0
8.3
7.6
7.2
7.3
7.6
7.5
7.6
12.6%
1.1
Arkans a s
14.4
14.2
14.0
13.6
13.1
12.2
12.3
12.6
12.5
12.4
13.0
9.9%
1.4
Ca l i forni a
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.7
4.5
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.0
4.0
4.0
17.8%
0.9
Col orado
6.3
6.7
6.4
6.4
6.5
6.4
6.3
6.4
6.3
6.1
6.2
1.8%
0.1
Connecti cut
4.6
4.3
4.3
4.5
4.5
4.3
4.1
3.9
3.8
3.9
3.7
19.9%
0.9
Del a wa re
5.0
4.7
4.8
4.6
4.4
4.4
4.1
4.3
4.3
3.3
3.3
34.6%
1.7
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
39.4%
0.4
Fl ori da
6.9
6.6
6.6
6.4
6.3
6.0
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.8
6.1
11.4%
0.8
Georgi a
8.5
8.1
8.3
8.2
8.2
8.3
8.0
7.9
7.6
7.8
8.1
4.6%
0.4
Ha wa i i
5.6
5.6
5.8
5.9
5.8
5.7
5.6
5.7
4.7
4.6
4.6
18.3%
1.0
Idaho
10.1
9.0
8.9
8.0
8.0
7.6
8.1
7.5
7.5
7.8
7.8
23.0%
2.3
Il l i noi s
8.1
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.9
7.5
7.6
7.8
7.8
7.6
5.9%
0.5
Indi ana
13.8
13.4
13.4
13.2
12.8
12.8
12.4
12.2
12.3
11.9
11.9
14.1%
1.9
Iowa
11.1
11.0
11.0
10.5
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.9
11.6
11.9
12.4
10.9%
1.2
Ka ns a s
12.0
11.4
11.7
11.7
11.5
10.4
10.2
10.9
10.4
10.6
10.6
11.7%
1.4
1.0
Kentucky
14.5
14.9
14.7
14.1
14.5
14.4
14.2
14.2
13.8
13.5
13.5
7.0%
Loui s i ana
26.0
22.6
23.2
21.3
21.4
20.1
21.6
22.6
21.5
18.9
20.4
21.6%
5.6
Ma i ne
11.9
11.6
11.8
11.0
11.1
11.2
10.3
10.3
10.3
9.4
9.5
20.0%
2.4
Ma ryl a nd
6.1
5.7
5.5
5.6
5.5
5.4
5.0
5.0
4.8
4.7
4.5
26.1%
1.6
Ma s s a chus etts
4.5
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.7
18.3%
0.8
Mi chi ga n
8.3
8.5
8.4
8.1
8.4
8.5
8.0
8.2
8.3
8.3
8.1
1.8%
0.2
Mi nnes ota
7.9
7.6
7.6
7.4
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.4
7.2
7.1
9.8%
0.8
Mi s s i s s i ppi
14.5
15.5
14.3
13.8
14.0
13.6
13.8
13.9
12.7
12.7
13.5
6.8%
1.0
Mi s s ouri
8.7
9.0
8.9
9.1
9.1
9.2
9.1
9.0
8.9
8.8
8.8
1.7%
0.1
Montana
20.4
18.3
18.9
18.4
18.6
18.9
19.0
18.8
18.4
16.9
17.7
13.1%
2.7
Nebra s ka
10.6
10.6
10.7
10.0
10.3
10.0
9.9
10.1
10.5
10.6
11.1
5.1%
0.5
Neva da
7.7
7.5
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.5
5.7
5.5
5.6
5.9
5.8
24.7%
1.9
NewHa mps hi re
7.5
7.3
7.4
8.3
8.6
8.4
7.6
7.8
7.7
7.3
7.5
0.3%
0.0
NewJers ey
5.8
5.5
5.5
5.3
5.3
5.4
5.1
5.4
5.2
5.0
5.1
12.0%
0.7
NewMexi co
13.8
13.4
12.4
12.4
11.9
12.1
12.1
12.2
11.9
12.1
11.0
20.1%
2.8
NewYork
4.6
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.2
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.5
24.7%
1.1
NorthCarol i na
7.8
7.5
7.5
7.7
7.5
7.2
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.5
6.6
16.4%
1.3
NorthDa kota
29.5
29.5
27.9
25.9
25.5
26.2
24.9
24.9
23.8
23.0
22.8
22.5%
6.6
9.0
8.8
8.6
8.7
8.6
8.7
8.6
8.7
8.7
8.2
8.5
6.0%
0.5
13.5
13.2
13.0
13.2
12.7
13.4
13.2
13.1
13.1
11.1
12.3
9.0%
1.2
9.0
8.2
8.1
7.8
7.4
7.1
6.8
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.2
31.1%
2.8
Penns yl va ni a
10.0
9.6
9.6
9.5
9.6
9.6
9.2
9.2
9.0
8.7
8.8
11.9%
1.2
RhodeIs l a nd
5.2
5.2
4.7
4.3
4.0
4.1
3.9
4.2
4.4
4.7
4.5
14.1%
0.7
SouthCa rol i na
12.9
12.4
12.7
12.2
13.0
12.8
12.5
12.3
12.2
12.5
12.5
3.6%
0.5
SouthDa kota
10.0
8.4
8.5
8.4
8.4
8.2
8.5
8.3
8.7
9.1
9.8
1.6%
0.2
Tennes s ee
10.5
10.5
10.1
9.8
9.7
9.6
9.1
9.2
8.8
8.4
8.4
19.4%
2.0
Texa s
14.2
13.6
13.6
13.4
12.8
12.1
11.6
11.1
10.8
10.5
10.6
25.5%
3.6
Uta h
10.8
10.2
9.9
9.9
9.9
9.7
9.4
9.2
9.1
8.6
8.5
21.3%
2.3
Vermont
9.1
8.2
7.9
7.9
7.7
7.6
8.1
7.5
7.6
8.1
7.5
16.7%
1.5
Vi rgi ni a
6.9
6.4
6.3
6.2
6.3
6.2
5.8
5.9
5.5
5.3
5.2
25.5%
1.8
Was hi ngton
8.6
7.5
8.0
7.7
7.6
7.3
7.4
7.1
6.9
6.7
6.6
23.1%
2.0
27.4
25.0
27.6
26.6
25.6
25.9
25.7
25.9
24.6
20.2
21.6
21.2%
5.8
Wi s cons i n
8.7
8.5
8.4
8.2
8.0
8.2
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.6
7.6
12.3%
1.1
Wyomi ng
33.4
31.3
30.2
30.6
29.5
29.7
27.5
28.0
26.9
23.1
24.6
26.5%
8.8
8.8
8.5
8.4
8.3
8.2
8.0
7.7
7.7
7.6
7.4
7.5
15.2%
1.3
Ohi o
Okl a homa
Oregon
Wes tVi rgi ni a
Avera gea l l s ta tes
Note:TheDi s tri ctofCol umbi ai s i ncl udedi ntheda ta tabl es ,butnoti ntheana l ys i s a s i ti s nota s tate.
Source:U.S.EnergyInformati onAdmi ni s trati on,StateEnergyDa ta Sys tema ndEIAca l cul a ti ons ma deforthi s a na l ys i s .
11
May2013
Table7.Carbonintensityoftheenergysupplybystate(20002010)
kilogramsenergyrelatedcarbondioxidepermillionBtu
Change
2000to2010
Percent
Absolute
State
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Al a bama
57.9
57.6
57.3
57.0
56.3
57.2
57.5
58.1
55.9
51.3
53.9
6.9%
Al a s ka
59.7
59.0
59.4
59.4
60.3
60.2
61.3
60.9
60.6
60.1
60.4
1.1%
0.6
Ari zona
55.0
56.0
54.8
55.8
56.2
57.0
57.9
56.9
56.0
54.6
55.0
0.1%
0.1
1.3
4.0
Arka nsa s
56.8
56.3
54.4
54.6
55.1
55.4
55.2
54.8
55.6
54.3
55.5
2.3%
Ca l i forni a
52.8
54.0
53.9
53.4
53.6
53.0
53.1
54.1
54.2
53.7
52.9
0.2%
0.1
Col ora do
69.1
68.8
69.4
68.4
68.9
68.5
68.6
67.5
66.5
65.8
66.5
3.7%
2.6
Connecti cut
49.9
51.8
50.9
50.8
50.4
51.4
49.4
49.3
49.6
47.2
47.2
5.5%
2.8
Del a wa re
69.6
68.3
67.5
69.1
69.4
69.9
69.5
70.0
69.1
65.2
64.0
8.1%
5.6
61.0
62.1
61.3
60.7
61.2
61.6
60.1
59.6
59.2
59.0
59.2
3.0%
1.8
Fl ori da
63.3
63.8
62.7
63.1
63.3
63.5
62.2
62.3
60.0
58.6
59.9
5.5%
3.5
0.7
Georgi a
59.6
59.5
58.6
59.7
59.7
61.3
61.2
61.5
61.3
59.1
58.9
1.2%
Ha wa i i
68.6
71.2
72.0
71.3
71.4
71.0
71.3
71.4
70.0
69.8
69.5
1.2%
0.8
Ida ho
39.2
43.9
41.8
42.9
43.2
42.2
39.3
42.4
40.6
39.5
41.2
5.1%
2.0
Il l i noi s
53.4
52.6
52.4
52.2
53.4
53.7
53.5
53.5
53.0
51.8
52.0
2.5%
1.4
Indi a na
77.6
78.0
77.4
77.1
77.5
77.4
78.1
77.6
76.8
75.5
75.1
3.2%
2.5
10.0
Iowa
66.3
67.3
66.1
66.3
64.6
63.4
62.7
62.0
60.3
56.6
56.2
15.1%
Ka ns as
64.8
63.7
65.1
65.0
63.9
65.7
64.9
64.6
64.0
63.0
62.2
4.0%
2.6
Kentucky
77.6
77.5
76.6
76.2
76.3
76.3
77.4
77.3
77.6
76.7
77.2
0.5%
0.4
Loui s i a na
54.9
54.7
54.6
55.4
55.4
56.0
56.6
56.3
57.0
56.1
56.2
2.3%
1.3
Mai ne
45.2
45.5
46.8
48.2
47.3
45.3
44.9
44.1
40.7
43.3
42.5
6.0%
2.7
Maryl and
60.7
62.6
62.7
61.9
61.8
62.2
61.5
60.9
60.1
59.1
59.2
2.5%
1.5
Mas s a chus etts
61.1
62.2
61.7
62.0
61.6
62.4
60.3
61.1
59.8
58.9
58.4
4.4%
2.7
Mi chi gan
62.5
61.4
59.9
60.5
60.0
59.6
60.4
60.2
59.5
60.7
59.0
5.6%
3.5
Mi nnes ota
58.6
58.8
59.0
60.4
59.4
58.5
58.1
57.4
56.3
54.8
53.9
8.1%
4.7
Mi s s i s s i ppi
54.9
58.8
56.7
57.9
57.7
56.8
56.9
57.1
57.6
55.3
55.6
1.2%
0.7
Mi s s ouri
70.5
70.9
71.1
71.6
71.8
71.7
71.6
71.1
70.2
69.8
70.6
0.3%
0.2
Monta na
59.6
65.3
60.4
63.2
63.5
62.4
60.9
62.4
61.4
60.2
62.0
3.9%
2.4
Nebras ka
59.9
60.9
59.2
61.2
58.7
60.2
59.7
56.9
57.2
57.7
54.1
9.7%
5.8
Nevada
67.2
67.2
66.4
66.8
66.7
66.5
61.3
61.7
61.2
59.7
59.2
11.9%
8.0
NewHa mps hi re
47.7
47.6
47.6
49.1
48.1
47.2
46.9
44.8
44.9
43.9
41.5
13.0%
6.2
NewJersey
53.5
53.2
52.7
53.9
54.9
54.7
53.5
53.8
53.7
51.2
52.0
2.9%
1.5
NewMexi co
71.9
72.5
72.1
72.8
72.5
71.9
71.2
69.7
69.1
69.9
68.4
4.9%
3.6
NewYork
52.8
52.5
51.7
52.9
52.7
52.4
50.4
50.8
49.3
47.8
47.8
9.4%
5.0
NorthCa rol i na
59.5
59.6
59.2
57.6
59.0
59.5
59.2
60.5
58.9
56.4
57.2
3.8%
2.3
7.6
NorthDakota
81.2
81.3
81.5
82.0
80.8
81.2
80.6
80.3
79.1
77.0
73.6
9.3%
Ohi o
68.0
69.0
70.3
70.9
69.2
70.0
69.8
69.9
69.0
68.6
68.7
1.1%
0.7
Okl a homa
67.3
67.1
67.5
67.5
65.8
65.9
66.0
64.5
64.8
64.3
63.2
6.1%
4.1
Oregon
37.9
41.3
38.3
39.0
39.1
40.3
37.4
40.2
39.3
38.6
39.1
3.0%
1.1
Penns yl vani a
61.0
60.4
60.6
60.6
60.1
60.7
60.6
60.1
58.9
57.2
57.5
5.7%
3.5
RhodeIsl and
58.1
59.2
59.9
60.3
60.2
60.3
58.9
58.9
55.7
56.4
56.1
3.4%
2.0
SouthCa rol i na
46.9
47.7
46.3
46.9
48.2
47.1
48.0
47.8
47.9
45.8
46.4
1.0%
0.5
10.1
SouthDakota
52.6
57.5
54.6
52.9
53.0
50.9
49.6
50.4
49.2
45.3
42.4
19.2%
Tennes s ee
60.4
59.1
58.8
58.2
57.7
58.0
60.3
60.0
59.2
54.4
55.5
8.0%
4.9
Texa s
57.3
57.7
57.4
57.6
57.1
57.5
57.1
56.9
56.6
56.0
55.7
2.9%
1.6
Uta h
75.6
76.3
76.5
75.8
76.6
76.3
75.3
75.0
74.5
74.0
73.5
2.8%
2.1
Vermont
37.3
39.3
38.4
38.1
40.7
39.3
35.9
37.9
34.6
34.0
34.5
7.6%
2.8
3.3
Vi rgi ni a
59.1
60.4
60.1
60.1
58.9
58.5
58.1
58.6
57.3
55.1
55.8
5.6%
Wa s hi ngton
37.0
41.3
35.3
37.1
37.8
38.3
35.6
37.7
36.9
37.7
37.4
1.0%
0.4
Wes tVi rgi ni a
83.4
82.8
83.4
83.7
83.2
83.1
83.0
83.5
82.9
80.6
81.7
2.0%
1.7
Wi s cons i n
62.0
61.7
61.9
61.1
62.1
61.9
60.4
60.3
60.2
58.7
58.7
5.3%
3.3
Wyomi ng
81.1
81.3
81.2
81.0
81.4
80.7
80.7
79.7
79.2
77.6
76.8
5.4%
4.3
59.5
60.1
59.5
59.8
59.7
59.9
59.5
59.5
58.9
57.6
57.6
3.2%
1.9
Note:TheDi s tri ctofCol umbi a i s i ncl udedi nthedatata bl es ,butnoti nthea nal ys i s a s i ti s notas ta te.
Source:U.S.EnergyInformati onAdmi ni s trati on,Sta teEnergyData Systema ndEIAcal cul ati ons madeforthi s a na l ys i s.
12
May2013
Table8.Carbonintensityoftheeconomybystate(20002010)
metrictonsenergyrelatedcarbondioxidepermilliondollarsofGDP
State
Change
2000to2010
Percent
Absolute
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Al a ba ma
1,058.7
986.0
997.7
980.5
950.1
936.4
935.7
938.5
889.0
785.5
861.3
18.6%
197.4
Al a s ka
1,298.3
1,216.1
1,175.5
1,199.3
1,223.9
1,270.7
1,148.5
1,084.2
961.1
850.3
859.7
33.8%
438.6
Ari zona
479.6
475.0
460.5
446.2
465.3
433.7
418.4
416.7
426.9
409.9
419.8
12.5%
59.8
Arka ns a s
817.9
798.1
758.7
741.3
722.0
676.9
680.3
691.9
694.0
671.4
720.0
12.0%
97.9
Ca l i forni a
259.3
262.0
256.3
251.5
241.3
229.9
227.4
227.4
219.1
216.4
213.5
17.6%
45.8
Col ora do
434.0
459.9
444.6
438.6
444.7
438.7
432.2
432.1
417.0
403.8
410.3
5.5%
23.7
Connecti cut
230.8
222.6
217.2
228.6
228.4
223.0
200.5
192.0
186.1
184.2
174.7
24.3%
56.1
Dela wa re
346.8
320.4
324.2
318.3
305.2
309.8
286.3
301.3
295.0
218.3
208.6
39.9%
138.2
Dis trictofCol umbi a

Fl ori da
61.5
55.3
54.9
50.1
49.5
47.4
38.0
39.6
35.6
36.6
36.1
41.2%
25.3
436.0
423.0
414.2
401.7
401.5
383.6
367.3
361.7
348.2
342.5
365.3
16.2%
70.7
Georgi a
509.4
479.7
488.7
488.3
491.2
506.4
490.3
488.0
465.5
458.5
479.9
5.8%
29.5
Ha wa i i
385.4
398.6
413.8
417.7
416.8
407.9
398.1
407.5
328.0
321.7
318.7
17.3%
66.6
75.6
Ida ho
395.2
394.7
370.9
344.4
347.5
322.8
318.7
317.4
304.9
309.7
319.6
19.1%
Il li noi s
432.1
414.0
416.3
412.7
416.0
424.9
401.3
409.4
412.0
403.7
396.3
8.3%
35.8
Indi a na
1,073.3
1,047.8
1,032.8
1,018.1
996.2
988.0
970.1
943.9
945.5
897.4
892.5
16.8%
180.7
Iowa
738.4
742.4
727.5
693.7
667.1
656.2
661.0
673.4
700.5
675.2
695.1
5.9%
43.3
Ka ns a s
776.9
723.3
764.8
763.4
736.0
684.7
662.9
703.8
668.7
666.3
658.1
15.3%
118.8
Kentucky
1,127.4
1,153.1
1,125.0
1,078.0
1,110.8
1,099.3
1,095.7
1,096.9
1,074.1
1,036.2
1,042.2
7.6%
85.2
Loui s i a na
1,427.7
1,234.8
1,265.3
1,182.3
1,186.5
1,124.3
1,223.5
1,271.5
1,224.1
1,061.6
1,145.0
19.8%
282.6
Ma i ne
536.2
527.9
550.2
529.5
524.1
507.2
461.0
452.8
418.0
407.5
403.0
24.8%
133.1
Ma ryla nd
369.6
356.8
345.7
348.6
342.0
338.2
307.0
304.3
289.2
278.9
266.2
28.0%
103.4
Ma s s a chus etts
272.8
266.0
268.4
267.3
258.5
260.7
232.8
239.4
229.0
215.4
213.3
21.8%
59.5
Mi chiga n
518.8
520.2
503.8
489.2
501.4
504.4
484.4
492.0
496.2
502.0
481.0
7.3%
37.8
Mi nnes ota
462.7
445.1
446.9
448.7
429.3
426.8
414.8
420.7
415.4
396.2
383.9
17.0%
78.8
Mi s s is s i ppi
797.5
913.8
807.6
798.4
806.2
775.6
786.9
791.5
733.4
699.9
751.9
5.7%
45.6
Mi s s ouri
612.4
641.2
633.9
652.6
651.6
659.9
652.3
642.3
623.5
617.4
624.6
2.0%
12.2
Monta na
1,215.8
1,195.7
1,140.6
1,163.8
1,180.6
1,181.1
1,158.3
1,172.0
1,129.8
1,015.9
1,097.6
9.7%
118.1
Nebra s ka
634.8
647.5
634.6
614.2
605.8
599.6
592.2
577.5
600.9
610.8
602.2
5.1%
32.5
Neva da
514.3
501.3
453.8
451.6
454.6
434.1
347.0
340.5
344.0
355.1
341.2
33.7%
173.1
NewHa mps hi re
358.3
347.5
352.1
404.9
415.2
396.5
356.4
351.0
347.6
322.6
311.0
13.2%
47.3
NewJers ey
308.0
294.9
291.7
288.4
289.4
296.8
272.9
288.2
278.7
254.4
263.1
14.6%
44.9
238.4
NewMexi co
991.4
967.4
896.4
904.8
864.4
872.5
864.2
849.5
823.4
847.4
753.1
24.0%
NewYork
244.9
230.7
225.0
235.0
232.3
219.1
192.1
195.5
187.4
179.7
167.1
31.8%
77.8
NorthCa rol i na
466.8
446.2
445.1
441.5
441.1
430.1
397.9
406.8
396.1
368.7
375.3
19.6%
91.5
712.6
2,393.4
2,401.1
2,270.2
2,126.3
2,062.2
2,125.1
2,009.6
2,001.5
1,886.3
1,768.3
1,680.8
29.8%
Ohio
NorthDa kota
615.2
605.3
605.8
616.2
593.5
606.4
596.9
606.2
598.9
565.3
584.5
5.0%
30.7
Okl a homa
907.2
884.2
881.1
887.6
832.4
886.0
870.5
846.2
849.0
713.2
775.0
14.6%
132.2
Oregon
340.2
338.6
310.6
304.3
290.9
286.2
255.4
269.1
262.7
259.7
241.5
29.0%
98.7
Penns yl va ni a
610.7
580.8
582.6
578.5
577.2
580.6
559.9
555.5
529.3
500.0
507.1
17.0%
103.6
51.3
RhodeIs l a nd
301.5
305.1
279.0
261.1
242.5
249.9
230.6
246.7
243.0
262.5
250.2
17.0%
SouthCa rol i na
606.5
590.2
589.9
574.2
625.7
604.0
600.0
588.1
582.3
573.8
579.0
4.5%
27.6
SouthDa kota
525.3
486.0
462.6
446.7
443.0
418.3
419.6
419.4
430.2
413.1
417.4
20.5%
107.9
Tennes s ee
632.0
620.1
596.5
572.8
560.3
554.9
550.6
550.5
523.3
457.3
468.3
25.9%
163.8
Texa s
815.2
786.3
781.1
769.4
732.8
698.1
663.6
632.5
612.9
586.0
589.9
27.6%
225.3
192.5
Uta h
817.3
776.1
759.4
753.2
761.1
738.0
705.7
689.3
678.9
634.7
624.8
23.6%
Vermont
338.1
322.8
303.0
302.5
313.5
299.6
291.2
285.3
263.2
276.0
260.4
23.0%
77.7
Vi rgi ni a
410.0
385.8
375.9
374.4
371.9
360.0
335.5
348.0
317.6
289.4
288.4
29.7%
121.6
Wa s hi ngton
Wes tVi rgi ni a
Wi s cons i n
319.5
311.1
282.7
284.7
288.4
280.3
262.4
267.1
255.8
253.4
248.3
22.3%
71.3
2,288.4
2,072.3
2,297.9
2,223.7
2,130.3
2,154.1
2,128.5
2,158.1
2,035.7
1,624.9
1,767.2
22.8%
521.2
539.8
525.6
521.8
498.9
498.0
504.6
461.2
464.5
471.8
448.2
448.4
16.9%
91.4
2,710.4
2,544.1
2,448.1
2,474.1
2,396.8
2,393.0
2,219.6
2,230.2
2,129.6
1,794.6
1,886.0
30.4%
824.4

524.0
508.0
502.6
496.1
488.7
477.9
459.2
458.7
Note:TheDi s tri ctofCol umbia i s i ncl udedi ntheda ta ta bl es ,butnoti nthea na l ys i s a s i ti s nota s ta te.
Source:U.S.EnergyInforma ti onAdmi ni s tra ti on,Sta teEnergyDa ta Sys tema ndEIAca l cul a ti ons ma deforthi s a na l ys is .
446.0
425.9
430.0
17.9%
94.0
Wyomi ng
13
May2013
Table9.Netelectricitytradeindexandprimaryelectricitysourceforselectedstates(20002010)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Primary
Source
LeastCO2percapita
NewYork
0.9
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
Nucl ea r
Ida ho
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
Hydroel ectric
Vermont
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.5
Nucl ea r
Cal i fornia
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
Natural Ga s
Connecticut
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.1
1.1
Nucl ea r
RhodeIs l and
1.0
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
Natural Ga s
Oregon
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Hydroel ectric
Ma s s achus etts
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
Natural Ga s
Wa s hi ngton
1.0
0.9
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
Hydroel ectric
Florida
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
Natural Ga s
Okl ahoma
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
Natural Ga s
NewMexico
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.5
Coal
India na
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
Coal
Monta na
1.7
1.9
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.3
2.0
Coal
Kentucky
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Coal
Loui s ia na
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
Natural Ga s
Wes tVirginia
3.0
2.6
2.9
3.0
2.8
2.8
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.1
2.3
Coal
Ala s ka
0.9
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
Natural Ga s
NorthDakota
3.0
2.6
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.4
Coal
Wyomi ng
3.3
3.1
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.5
Coal
MostCO2percapita
Grea terthan1.0i ndi cates a netexporterofel ectri city.

Les s than1.0i ndi cates a netimporterofelectri ci ty.
1990through2010(Mi l li onkil owa tthours )
http://www.eia .gov/el ectricity/s tate/
Note:TheDis trictofCol umbia is i ncludedi nthedatatables ,butnoti ntheanal ys i s as i ti s nota s ta te.
Source:U.S.EnergyInforma ti onAdminis tra tion,StateEl ectricityProfil es ,Ta bl e10.Suppl ya ndDi sposi tionofEl ectricity,
14
May2013
AppendixA.ComparisonoffueldetailfortheStateEnergyDataSystemandthe
AnnualandMonthlyEnergyReviewdatasystems
ConsumptionSector
EnergySource
Category
StateEnergyDataSystem
FuelDetail
Annual/MonthlyEnergyReview
FuelDetail
Res identi a l
Coa l
Coa l
Coa l
Res identi a l
Na tura lGa s
Na tura lGa s
Na tura l Ga s
Res identi a l
Petrol eum
Dis til l ateFuel
Di s ti ll a teFuel
Res identi a l
Petrol eum
Keros ene
Keros ene
Res identi a l
Petrol eum
LPG
LPG
Commerci a l
Coa l
Coa l
Coa l
Commerci a l
Na tura lGa s
Na tura lGa s
Na tura l Ga s
Commerci a l
Petrol eum
Dis til l ateFuel
Di s ti ll a teFuel
Commerci a l
Petrol eum
Keros ene
Keros ene
Commerci a l
Petrol eum
LPG
LPG
Commerci a l
Petrol eum
MotorGa s ol i ne
MotorGa s ol ine
Commerci a l
Petrol eum
Res idua l Fuel
Res i dua l Fuel
Commerci a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
PetCoke
Indus tri a l
Coa l
Coa l Total
Coa l Tota l
Indus tri a l
Coa l/Coke
NotAvai l a bl e
Cokingcoa l
Indus tri a l
Coa l
NotAvai l a bl e
OtherCoa l
Indus tri a l
Coa l/Coke
NotAvai l a bl e
NetCokeImports
Indus tri a l
Na tura l Ga s
Na tura lGa s
Na tura l Ga s
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
As pha lta ndRoa dOi l
As pha l tandRoa dOi l
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
Dis til l ateFuel
Di s ti ll a teFuel
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
Keros ene
Keros ene
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
LPGTotal
LPGTota l
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Norma lButa ne/Butyl ene
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Etha ne/Ethylene
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Is obuta ne/Is obutylene
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Propa ne/Propylene
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Buta ne/Propa neMi x
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Etha ne/PropaneMix
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
Lubri ca nts
Lubri ca nts
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
MotorGa s ol i ne
MotorGa s ol ine
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
Res idua l Fuel
Res i dua l Fuel
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
Petrol eumProducts (Other)
Deta il a s fol l ows :
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
PetroleumCoke
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Avi ati onGa s BlendingComponents

MotorGa s ol ineBl endi ng
Components
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Penta nes Plus
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Petrochemi ca l Feeds tocks
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Speci a l Na phtha s
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Sti ll Gas
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Unfini s hedOil s
Indus tri a l
Petrol eum
NotAvai l a bl e
Waxes
15
May2013
ConsumptionSector
EnergySource
Category
StateEnergyDataSystem
FuelDetail
Annual/MonthlyEnergyReview
FuelDetail
Tra ns porta ti on
Coa l
Coa l
Coa l
Tra ns porta ti on
Na tura l Ga s
Na tura l Ga s
Na tura lGa s
Tra ns porta ti on
Petrol eum
Avi a ti onGa s ol i ne
Avia ti onGa s oli ne
Tra ns porta ti on
Petrol eum
Dis ti l l a teFuel
Di s ti ll a teFuel
Tra ns porta ti on
Petrol eum
JetFuel (Tota l)
JetFuel (Tota l )
Tra ns porta ti on
Petrol eum
LPG
LPG
Tra ns porta ti on
Petrol eum
Lubri ca nts
Lubrica nts
Tra ns porta ti on
Petrol eum
MotorGa s ol i ne
MotorGa s oli ne
Tra ns porta ti on
Petrol eum
Res idua l Fuel
Res i dua l Fuel
El ectri cPower
Coa l
Coa l
Coa l
El ectri cPower
Na tura l Ga s
El ectri cPower
Petrol eum
Na tura l Ga s
Na tura lGa s
Dis ti l l a teFuel (inc.Keros eneJet Di s ti ll a teFuel (i nc.Keros eneJet
Fuel)
Fuel )
El ectri cPower
Petrol eum
Petrol eumCoke
Petrol eumCoke
El ectri cPower
Petrol eum
Res idua l Fuel
Res i dua l Fuel
El ectri cPower
Renewa bl es
NotAva i la bl e
Geotherma l
El ectri cPower
Wa s te
NotAva i la bl e
Nonbi oma s s wa s te
16

State-Level Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2000-2010

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

State-Level Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2000-2010

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

State-Level Energy-Related

Carbon Dioxide Emissions,

Independent Statistics & Analysis

Di s tri ctofCol umbi a

Wes tVi rgi ni a

NorthCa rol ina

Wes tVi rgi ni a

Di s tri ctofCol umbi a

Dis tri ctofColumbi a

Mas s a chus etts

NewHa mps hire

SouthCa rol ina

Wes tVi rgi ni a

Avera gea ll s ta tes

Di s tri ctofCol umbi a

Wes tVi rgi ni a

Avera gea l l s ta tes

Di s tri ctofCol umbi a

Mas s a chus etts

Wes tVi rgi ni a

Avera gea l l s ta tes

Dis trictofCol umbi a

Avera gea l l s ta tes

Grea terthan1.0i ndi cates a netexporterofel ectri city.

Dis til l ateFuel

Dis til l ateFuel

Res idua l Fuel

Res i dua l Fuel

As pha lta ndRoa dOi l

As pha l tandRoa dOi l

Dis til l ateFuel

Norma lButa ne/Butyl ene

Is obuta ne/Is obutylene

Buta ne/Propa neMi x

Res idua l Fuel

Res i dua l Fuel

Petrol eumProducts (Other)

Deta il a s fol l ows :

Avi ati onGa s BlendingComponents

Penta nes Plus

Petrochemi ca l Feeds tocks

Avia ti onGa s oli ne

Res idua l Fuel

Res i dua l Fuel

Res idua l Fuel

Res i dua l Fuel

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen