Subject: BPA1302317; JN 1046 Debutanizer Reboiler (20-HA-005)

Our Ref: BPA1302317; Our comments are as follows: 1) Manufacturers calculations : Girth Flange (i) Tube sheet (i) (ii)

It appears that girth flange calculations are not performed. It appears from our calculations that bolting would be inadequate. Please clarify.

It appears manufacturer has not performed tube sheet calculations. We conclude that mean metal temperature for shell side is 219 deg C and 193 deg C for tube side. Please confirm.

Lug Support calculations ( i) Operating weight is 19527 kg shown in the drawing. Operating weight calculated 14062 kg in PVElite elements and Detail weights. Operating weight considered in support lug calculation is 30915 kg. This discrepancy in weight values is not clear. ( ii) Manufacturers basis of arriving at moment of lug Mlug for blast and operating condition is requested. It is requested to submit a calculation for Mlug for better understanding. (iii) Acceleration values for transportation are not shown and Calculations for transportation conditions are not performed.

The stresses in shell and lug supports due to wind and accelerations loads would be review after receipt of clarification to above points. Nozzle Calculations: (i) Manufacturers basis of performing Fatigue analysis at Nozzle is requested. (ii) We conclude that pressure fluctuation (cyclic loads) are not applicable (as confirmed for earlier jobs). Please confirm. If this pressure cyclic load is applicable, all 50 NB nozzles would require reinforcement calculations. It appears that reinforcement of all 50 NB nozzles is inadequate at present. The local loads shown in the drawing and in the calculations do not match. Please clarify.

(iii)

2) It is concluded that equipment is not intended for lethal service.

3) Manufacturers attention is drawn to Clause UCS-67 (a) (3) for requirement of impact testing of welding procedure when MDMT is colder than -29 deg C.

4) We note that Manufacturer has shown a PED category for the equipment as category IV. Manufacturer should indicate the volume as per Article-9 and State of Fluid (Liquid/gas) as per Article-3 of Directive. This should be clearly shown on the drawing. The Category of the vessel as per Annexure-II of the Directive will be checked upon receipt of above details. 5) It is concluded that equipment is designed for steady state loads. Fatigue analysis at lug supports locations is not required.

6) PED Documents: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) Operating Manual is to be submitted. The corrosion allowance in Hazard Analysis for tube side is incorrect. Please correct. Impact test at -10 deg C in Hazard Analysis is not clear. Please correct. In PMA, impact test temperature for SA 333 Gr. 6 should be -45 deg C as per SA 333 Gr. 6 material specification. Please clarify. PMA for bolting is to be submitted. The tube sheet to shell weld detail is not shown, Please clarify or show the detail in the drawing.