Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
by MaryamJoon 11-Sep-2012 You only have to know three names to understand this story: (1) Remey, (2) Abdu'lBah, and (3) Jensen. The .!. "ourt#s o$inion re%e"tin& the a$$eal o' the (aha#i
leader#s ra$e "onvi"tion is below. )nd as you will see *emey sou&ht to desi&n a (aha#i buildin& in +ran. Charles Remey: ,harles *emey was a $rominent )meri"an (ah-./, with a "lose relationshi$ with one o' the "entral (aha#i holy 'i&ures, )bdu.l0(ah-, and was one o' the $eo$le that or&ani1ed his 'amily#s tri$s to the .!. and looked a'ter them. *emey was also an ar"hite"t within the (ah-./ leadershi$. 2e desi&ned the )ustralian and &andan (ah-./ 2ouse o' 3orshi$ whi"h still stand today and are the 4mother tem$les5 'or )'ri"a. $on the re6uest o' !ho&hi 7''endi, )bdul (aha#s son, *emey made desi&ns 'or a (ah-./ 2ouse o' 3orshi$ in Tehran. *emey was also a member o' what is "alled 89ine 2ands o' the ,ause# (the (aha#+ leadershi$) ele"ted as the authority until the ele"tion o' what is "alled +srael#s 8 niversal 2ouse o' Justi"e# in 1:;3. Remey was well-liked by`Abdu'l-Bah and worked with him: )bdu.l0(ah- $raised *emey#s e''orts and "hara"ter in a a writin& ("alled a 4Tablet5) to ,orrine True, $ublished in the (ah-./ newsletter 4!tar o' the 3est5 in )u&ust 1:2<. 3hat 'ollows is one o' the many e=am$les o' >)bdu.l0(ah-#s a''e"tion 'or *emey: "Praise be unto God, that the model [of the structure] made by Mr !our"eois #as appro$ed by his honor, Mr %emey, and selected by the &on$ention 'is honor, Mr %emey is, $erily, of perfect sincerity 'e is li(e unto transparent #ater, filtered) lucid and #ithout any impurity 'e #or(ed earnestly for se$eral years, but he did not ha$e any personal moti$e 'e has not attachment to anythin" e*cept to the &ause of God +his is the spirit of the firm and this is the characteristic of the sincere " (!tar o' the 3est. ?olume 11, 9o. :, $. 13:) Abdu'l-Bah in !"#! stated the followin$ about Remey: ", ha$e adopted you as my son -ou ha$e to appreciate this fa$or $ery much indeed .ne should see that you are li$in" accordin" to the re/uirements of this sonship -ou should be a#are of your responsibilities My prayers #ill help you , al#ays pray for you " (>)bdu.l0(ah- to *emey, 1:21: @inal ?isit in Tiberias, @olio 2, A) Bil&rima&e to the 2oly Cand: *eminis"es o' the Master, 1:21A, $$.12D012:) Remey % &ensen: *emey#s "lose asso"iate was a man by the name o' Er. Celand Jensen, (4Co"al (ah-./ Ceader dead at F15. )u&ust F, 1::;. Missoulian $. (2). *emey and Jensen im$lemented a s"heme to use "hildren, se=ually, to lure $eo$le to the (aha#i movement. Eurin& the three +ranian eras (Ga%ar, Bahlavi, and +*+) there were similar "om$laints, and there were similar "om$laints durin& the 1:H<s and 1:I<s by +ndia#s and Bakistan#s Barsi (Joroastrian) ,ommunity. 'he courts affirmation of the Bahai leaders child rape con(iction:
)'A'* +, -+.'A.A/ 01AI.'I,,-R*)0+.2*.'/ (3 2R3 1*1A.2 &*.)*./ 2*,*.2A.'-A00*11A.' 0*'I'I+.*R3 Kri&inal Bro"eedin& 'or Bost0"onvi"tion *elie' made by +nmate o' the Montana !tate Brison B7* , *+)M KB+9+K9 Ee'endant in this "ause has 'iled a $etition 'or $ost0"onvi"tion relie'. Ee'endant had a$$ealed his "onvi"tion to this ,ourt and it was a''irmed. !ee !tate v. Jensen, 1I3 Mont. 233, HII B.2d ;31. +n his $etition de'endant asserts that his senten"e and the $ro"eedin&s whereby it was $ro"ured violated the due $ro"ess and e6ual $rote"tion "lauses o' the 1Hth )mendment to the nited !tates ,onstitution, in that: 1. !e"tion :H0H1<;, *.,.M. 1:HD, as a$$lied to this "ase and the senten"e im$osed "onstituted "ruel and unusual $unishmentL 2. !aid se"tion :H0H1<;, *.,.M. 1:HD, as a$$lied to his "ase is va&ue and without standardsL 3. The !tate "alled 'or $rodu"tion o' eviden"e by the de'endant be'ore he testi'iedL and H. The !tate 'orbid de'endant and his "ounsel 'rom interviewin& witnesses "alled by the !tate. !e"tion :H0H1<;, *.,.M. 1:HD, reads: A)ny $erson over the a&e o' ei&hteen (1F) years, who shall wil'ully and lewdly "ommit any lewd and las"ivious a"t, other than the a"ts "onstitutin& other "rimes $rovided in se"tion :H0H1<1 to :H0H1<F, u$on or with the body or any $art or member thereo', of a child under the a$e of si4teen 5!67 years, with the intent o' arousin&, a$$ealin& to, or &rati'yin& the lust or $assions or se=ual desires o' su"h $erson, or o' su"h "hild, shall be &uilty o' a 'elony, and shall be im$risoned in the state $rison not e="eedin& twenty0'ive (2I) years.A This statute was ori&inally ena"ted as !e". 1, ,h. I:, Caws o' 1:13, and remains substantially the same today e="e$t that the $enalty was in"reased by !e". 1, ,h. ID, Caws o' 1:I:. The "onstitutionality o' this statute was u$held in !tate v. Mo"her, 112 Mont. I11, 11: B.2d 3I. There is nothin& "ruel or unusual about a senten"e "on'inin& one to the state $rison 'or the "ommission o' a 'elony. The se"ond "ontention that the statute is va&ue and without standards is without merit. )s stated by this ,ourt in the Mo"her "ase, su$ra, the elements o' the "rime as set 'orth in the statute are: 'irst, the o''ender must be over the a&e o' 1F yearsL se"ond, a lewd or las"ivious a"t must have been "ommitted u$on or with the body or any $art or member thereo', o' a "hild under 1; years o' a&eL and third, the a"t must have been "ommitted with the intent o' arousin&, a$$ealin& to, or &rati'yin& the lust or $assions or se=ual desires o' the a""used or the "hild. There is nothin& va&ue about this lan&ua&e and the standards are s$e"i'i"ally set 'orth.
)s to the re6uest by the !tate 'or the $rodu"tion o' eviden"e by de'endant be'ore he testi'ied, it is true as dis"losed by the 6uote 'rom the re"ord that the $rose"ution stated: A3e will "all u$on the do"tor to $rodu"e that "ard.A 9o ob%e"tion was made to this re6uest, in 'a"t "ounsel 'or the de'endant stated: A3e have the "ase history here and we will be &lad to &ive it to you.A 2owever, even i' we were to "on"ede, ar&uendo, that the !tate should not have made any su"h re6uest, what $re%udi"e resultedN 9one. Ee'endant willin&ly 'urnished what was re6uested without any ob%e"tion whatever. The 'inal assertion, that the !tate 'orbid the de'ense 'rom interviewin& witnesses. +n su$$ort o' this "har&e de'endant submits e="er$ts 'rom the trial trans"ri$t o' "autionary remarks made by the trial %ud&e to witnesses, advisin& them not to talk with anyone about the "ase on trial and i' they desired advi"e as to the $ro$er thin& to do in any su"h situation they should "onsult the "ounty attorney. Thus it was the statements o' the trial %ud&e rather than any remarks made by the $rose"ution that are "ited in su$$ort o' the "ontention. These matters were "onsidered by this ,ourt u$on the a$$eal as indi"ated by the 'ollowin& $ara&ra$h 'rom our o$inion: AEurin& the "ourse o' the trial the "ourt on several o""asions &ave instru"tions to the witnesses and made other "omments, some o' whi"h may have im$lied to the %ury that the "ourt 'elt the witnesses were tellin& the truth. 3e 'ind no merit in a$$ellant.s ar&ument on this issue. )t no time did his "ounsel ob%e"t to these "omments. The leadin& "ase in Montana on "omments by the "ourt is !tate v. Ei=son, F< Mont. 1F1, 2;< B. 13F (1:2D). +n that "ase ob%e"tion to the "omment was made immediately and we see no reason why that should not have been done here. The &eneral rule is that the lower "ourt "annot be $ut in error with an issue raised 'or the 'irst time on a$$eal. !tate v. ,am$bell, 1H; Mont. 2I1, H<I B.2d :DF O22 ).C.*.3d F2HP (1:;I).A 'here bein$ no merit to any of the contentions made by the defendant his petition for post-con(iction relief is denied.
Recently by -aryam&oon !e"rets o' the Eead Brin"e: 3hat 7verybody !hould Mnow Mrs. )rash +sraeldoost: Guestions Q "omments 'or her Q +srael.s Ca"keys 2istory o' )1arbai%an Q 3ho !$onsors !e$aratism 0 a short history. more 'rom MaryamJoon
1o$in or re$ister to post comments
Commen ts D 13 2
2ate !e$ 2H, 2<12 !e$ 23, 2<12 !e$ 22, 2<12
I doubt it3333
by EaleT2usband on Sat Sep 17, 2012 08125 PM P4+ ,harles Mason *emey.s su$$osed ado$tion by )bdu.l0(aha as his son is somethin& that 2ai'an (aha.is have "onsistently denied sin"e the 1:;<s. +.d think i' it were at all valid, then )bdu.l0(aha would have a$$ointed *emey as the @+*!T Suardian o' the ,ause o' Sod and not !ho&hi 7''endi. Eale 2usband, the 2onorable !ke$ti" R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
)ome corrections
by EaleT2usband on Sat Sep 17, 2012 08110 PM P4+ !ho&hi 7''endi was )bdu.l0(aha.s eldest $randson. There were do1ens o' 2ands o' the ,ause o' Sod in 1:ID, when !ho&hi 7''endi died. The nine 2ands, in"ludin& Charles -ason Remey, that were ele"ted to lead the @aith until the establishment o' the niversal 2ouse o' Justi"e in 1:;3 were "alled ,ustodians o' the @aith.
)'ter !ho&hi 7''endi died, it was dis"overed that he had a$$ointed no one to su""eed him as Suardian o' the ,ause o' Sod, and su"h an a$$ointment would have had to have been a$$roved by a "oun"il o' nine o' the 2ands o' the ,ause o' Sod, ele"ted by the entire body o' 2ands themselves. This was "learly de'ined in the :ill and 'estament of Abdu'l-Baha3 (ut when *emey made "laim to be the se"ond Suardian, with no eviden"e that this was %usti'ied, the ,ustodians o' the @aith voted to re%e"t that "laim as 'alse. *emey was then e=$elled as a ,ovenant (reaker. (ut the ultimate ,ovenant (reaker was !ho&hi 7''endi himsel'U 2is death a"tually $ut an end to any le&itima"y the ,ovenant o' the (aha.i @aith ever had. 3hen *emey was e=$elled 'rom the @aith, so was anyone who 'ollowed him and a""e$ted his 'alse "laim, in"ludin& Celand Jensen. (ut *emey.s 'ollowers be&an 'i&htin& amon& themselves even be'ore *emey died at about 1<< years o' a&e. (y that time, he had &one senile and was in"a$able o' any leadershi$ "a$a"ity. @inally, Jensen.s "hild molestation "onvi"tion has nothin& to with the validity (or la"k thereo') o' the "laims o' the (aha.i @aith itsel'. Eale 2usband, the 2onorable !ke$ti" R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
K' "ourse +ranian (ahais are our own "hildren, but also $eo$le have to know that there is a political &ame in the ba"k&roundL and they have to know that most (ahais are not+ranians (and these 'orei&ners make themselves involved in +ranian issues on behal' o' +srael). +' a "hild is +ranian, and wants to stay (ahai, + would say to them
do .+' 'ollow the 8aifa-Israeli-Bahai ... there are other &rou$s o' (ahai 'or them to %oin. 2ere is a &rou$ that says they are not "onne"ted to +srael and "riti"i1es the 8aifaIsraeli-Bahai 0olitical ;roup and -ilitary 0ropa$anda +perations3 *e'orm (ahai Bress I22H )intree *oad *o"hester, M+ HF3<;02D13 0hone: (2HF) ;I20H:F2 R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
:as the =) &ud$e who con(icted the Bahai leader a >Bahai hater>9
by MaryamJoon on :ri Sep 16, 2012 08166 3M P4+ +' you "an.t answer that 6uestion, it means you are not addressin& 'a"ts in the "ourt.s de"ision and sour"es "ited. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
@or someone who uses several aliases on this site, one o' them bein& 'ruthseeker", you have a lot o' "hut1$ah $rea"hin& to anyoneU (ut, hey, "hut1$ah is what you $eo$le have in abundan"e. Tell your handlers in the (+) and MK!!)E, we don.t "are anymore what you $eo$le say 0 and nor do the hundreds who have le't this webiste be"ause o' the insane asylum and +sraeli surveillan"e0$ro$a&anda site you $eo$le s$e"i'i"ally have turned it into. 2ave a ni"e day, !hlomo :) R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
,rasho$ar
by *eality0(ites on :ri Sep 16, 2012 01172 3M P4+ 2avin& read some o' your AeruditeA "ontributions on +, on various sub%e"ts, it.s $retty "lear you wouldn.t know the word Aembarrassin&A i' it "ame u$ to you and kneed you in the "rot"h. + don.t think + have ever read 6uite as mu"h drivel $rodu"ed by a sin&le individual on +, as you. A(ahai +nternet )&en"yAN A(ahai holohoa= denierAN 3hat the hell are you witterin& on aboutN Kn se"ond thou&hts $lease don.t answerL + "an only take so mu"h bullshit in a sin&le day. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
Reality-Bites
by @rasho&ar on :ri Sep 16, 2012 01165 3M P4+ You really should "he"k with your handlers in the Baha'i Internet A$ency be'ore $uttin& 'in&er to keyboard and embarrassin& yoursel'. The &rou$s under dis"ussion have no +ranian re$resentation whatsoever. They are solely )meri"an based s"hismati" &rou$s who the mainstream (aha.is "all A"ovenant breakersA. The 2ai'an 2J or&ani1ation "onsiders Celand Jensen, Mason *emey, et", and the or&ani1ations they s$awned to be enemies. (ut, yes, + am a A(aha.i holohoa= denier.A The so0"alled $erse"ution o' the (aha.is o' +ran is e=a&errated and many o' its items are outri&ht 'i"tions, the e=isten"e o' the narrative bein& there solely to undermine +ran. (ut the 6uestion remains, sin"e you are not an +ranian, why do you "areN
Reality-Bites
by Just)n+ranian on :ri Sep 16, 2012 12170 3M P4+ Thank you 'or the in'ormation. + was very sur$rised at herVhis views. 9eo09a1i.s talked about the Jews like that and the +slami" *e$ubli" hates everybody o'"ourse... R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
+t.s a "ourt "ase: ) $rominent (ahai ra$ed a "hildL he went to $risonL and he was asso"iated with someone linked to )bdul (aha. The $roblem with (ahai $roselyti1in& sites is they make their own A'a"tsA 00 they sit around day and ni&ht writin& thin&s and $uttin& them u$ on their website while restri"tin& the $ubli".s ability to "omment on those thin&s. ,an you "omment on o''i"ial (ahai websites as you "an hereN + don.t think so. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
)hiism@0edophilia
by asadabad on +hu Sep 12, 2012 11117 PM P4+ 3hat does the bahai reli&ion have to do with "hild ra$eN Their reli&ion doesn.t have any laws that le&ali1e this behavior. !hiism le&ali1es "hild ra$e, $rostitution, and sodomy. Ce&ali1in& !odomy: (D) 9arrated Muhammad bin Yahya, 'rom )hmad bin Muhammad, 'rom al0(ar6iy re$ortin& (+mam) )bu )bdullah OasP sa sayin&: AIf the man used the woman's anus/ but did not e<aculate/ there is no ;husl on either one3 But if he e<aculated/ he must take a $husl/ not her3> al0Ma'i ('il @uroo.): al0Mulainy, (ook o' Tahra, ,ha$ter: 3hat Mandates Shusl on the Man and 3oman, vol.3, $.HD, narration F ;7< ";=arrated< al-'ussain bin 3li bin -a/teen said1 I asked Abul-8assan AasB about the permissibility for the man to ha(e anal se4 with women/ he AasB said: It was made halal 5permissible7333> Ta'seer al0)yyashi, vol.1, $.1IDL (ihaar al0)nwaar vol.21, $.:FL Ta'seer al0(urhaan vol.2, $.23< )nd ri&ht 'rom the 12th +mams re$resentative: >A man can ha(e se4ual pleasure from a child as youn$ as a baby3 2owever, he should not $enetrate. +' he $enetrates and the "hild is harmed then he should be res$onsible 'or her subsisten"e all her li'e. This &irl, however would not "ount as one o' his 'our $ermanent wives. The man will not be eli&ible to marry the &irl.s sister.A
The "om$lete Bersian te=t o' this sayin& "an be 'ound in A)yatollah Mhomeini in Tahrirolvasyleh, @ourth 7dition, Earol 7lm, Gom, 1::<A R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
-aryam&oon
by @rasho&ar on >ed Sep 12, 2012 12169 3M P4+ You were ri&ht. The (aha.i +nternet )&en"y has shown u$ in 'ull 'or"eU R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
UVW XSLG
+ue Sep 11, 2012 10112 PM P4+ WZ ] uvj p^uan UUz{| }gn qc ~a WXr`a] onUUf\lj amnamj de onfj d^p qrs on tuvw puefj _ne xay Y\ q` f\ WZ \sUU aj tuvw wfs^u ev` WZ abc UU ufg\` \vi ep Wwfs^u pq ufg\` qj pa] uvj ] jUU peu a\ j f q Warh\` amj flnu _`UU I wear an +me$a watch
g\i ep f qZev\` qc ] U}namj fmj uvrh\` ] aY f b{] on ai xab{Y` WZ ^ }\Y` WZ ^ e qpeu h^ pqrne fw aw aj }X^u de xa\efne ] Y\ uv\j ^ Uqr] uvw s b ^ uf] paU uvy^ defje efj de Waw Wnf` de pa\Yj tp` f aj. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
^LK
MaryamJoon +ue Sep 11, 2012 09109 PM P4+ Y\ ^pu qeu }` ep x ] fZ R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
Completely accurate
by MaryamJoon on +ue Sep 11, 2012 00162 PM P4+ T27 K@@+,+)C ()2)+ C+(*)*Y )C!K )EM+T!: AThe .2ands o' the ,ause. ((ahai Ceaders) had &athered in the 2oly Cand, in"ludin& Charles -ason Remey....A ORemey was a main insider as admitted by fficial Bahai records.P )nd the re"ords 'urther des"ribe *emey as someone who Arecei!ed great honours from both "aster and Guardian ()bdul (aha and his son 7''endi).A R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
)ll (aha.is love +ran and "onsider it holy. 2owever, instead o' re$lyin& to ea"h one o' these baseless and in'lammatory remarks, + "hoose to say: May Sod bless our beauti'ul land, +ran, and all her $ea"e0lovin& sons and dau&hters.
Kbviously, the idea o' a "ou$le o' "ree$s harmin& "hildren throu&h se=ual abuse 00 and wantin& to build a house o' worshi$ in Tehran )9E their "lose 'riendshi$ and workin& relationshi$ with )bdul (aha and his 'amily is somethin& $eo$le ou&ht to have a 'air "han"e to read and make their own minds u$ about. Eon.t $ra"titioners o' the (ahai s"hool say their 'aith >demands independent in(esti$ation of the truth>N )ny way, thanks a&ain. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
RB
by Truthseeker: on +ue Sep 11, 2012 07105 PM P4+ 2e.s in dra& this time .... R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
8ere is my theory333
by @rasho&ar on +ue Sep 11, 2012 02117 PM P4+ Cet us "all them the A(oardA. (y the (oard + do not mean the 2ands o' the ,ause or the 2J. The (oard had !ho&hi 7''endi murdered in 1:ID in Condon and $ro"eeded to le&ally take over all the assets, $ro$erties and monetary 'ortunes o' the 2ai'an (aha.i or&ani1ation &lobally. 3hile !ho&hi 7''endi was still alive, it was im$ossible 'or the (oard to 'ully "ontrol the 2ai'an (aha.i or&ani1ation. The (oard.s interest was to ensure that 2ai'an (aha.ism did not remain a 'amily a''air and that the 'ortunes o' this or&ani1ation devolved to them. !ho&hi 7''endi went to Condon with his ,anadian so"ialite wi'e in late 1:ID and there as he was about to $ubli"i1e his last will and testament and the name o' his su""essor amon& his male 'amily members, he was bum$ed o'' with the 'ull "om$li"ity and "oo$eration o' his wi'e. ) 'lu, a "ommon "old, was blamed 'or his demise but no auto$sy was ever allowed to determine the a"tual medi"al reasons 'or his death. 3ith !ho&hi 7''endi.s death, the (oard took over everythin& and eliminated the in'luen"e o' any rivals to its own "laim within the 2ai'an (aha.i lands"a$e. The (oard are not all Jews. (ut the (oard does have si&ni'i"ant +sraeli re$resentation. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
&ensen % Remey
by @rasho&ar on +ue Sep 11, 2012 02102 PM P4+ ,ould never have &ained si&ni'i"ant 'ollowers on their own in +ran. *emey tried, even had a hand'ul o' +ranian 'ollowers, but 'ailed be"ause his whole 'o"us was a very 3estern, )meri"an one. Jensen never attra"ted a sin&le +ranian to himsel', so 'ar as + know. )s 'ar as the *emeyites are "on"erned, thin&s "ould "han&e 'or the 'ortunes o' the Maran&ella (aha.i "ult on"e Joel Maran&ella.s desi&nated su""essor 9osrat (ahremand takes over. n'ortunately + don.t 'ind 9osrat very "harismati" or knowled&eable, but who knows. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
By that time the Israeli $o(ernment had occupied the whole thin$
by MaryamJoon on +ue Sep 11, 2012 02172 PM P4+ (e'ore it was a subsidiary, then it be"ame wholly owned. My "on"ern is what i' he had been allowed to run loose in +ran with his 'ollowers. Beo$le think that.s a %oke, but it.s not. ,an you ima&ine non0+ranians "omin& to +ran to bu&&er +ranian kidsN !i"kenin&. Beo$le need to kee$ their senses alert about these thin&s. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
I know
by @rasho&ar on +ue Sep 11, 2012 02169 PM P4+ (ut he was also e=tremely &reedy, not to mention "om$letely senile by the late .I<s, and it "ame ba"k to haunt him in the $ower stru&&le with the 2ands 'rom ID0;3 whi"h he lost. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
2ear +nlyIran
by MaryamJoon on +ue Sep 11, 2012 02160 PM P4+ )""ordin& to the .!. "ourt 00 not Mullahs 00 he was $erse"utin& )meri"an kids as an adherent o' the (ahai movement. 3hat does that have to do with the &overnment o' +ranN R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
&ensen
by @rasho&ar on +ue Sep 11, 2012 02162 PM P4+ 3as bona 'ide "ra1y. !o was *emey in my book. )bbas 7''endi a$$ears to have $la"ed watermelons under the arm$its o' all the wron& $eo$le in 9orth )meri"a. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
+nlyiran
by @rasho&ar on +ue Sep 11, 2012 02160 PM P4+ This re&ards the Jensen ( B, "ult. This &rou$ are the in'amous "ovenant breakers and enemies o' those who 'ollow the 2J in 2ai'a. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments
;ood find
by @rasho&ar on +ue Sep 11, 2012 02161 PM P4+ This do"ument is revealin& o' the a"tivities o' the enemies and "om$etitors o' the 2ai'ans here. @or those who don.t know, Celand Jensen was the 'ounder o' the s"hismati" (aha.i se"t known as the Baha'is =nder the 0ro(isions of the Co(enant whi"h is a wa"ky a$o"aly$ti" (aha.i "ult mi=in& (ibli"al s$e"ulation with all kinds o' weird nonsense. The 'ounder o' the (ran"h Eravidian 3a"o "ult, Eavid Moresh, was brie'ly asso"iated with Celand Jensen be'ore he broke with him. The 2ai'ans des$ise these $eo$le 0 even tried suin& them re"ently 0 and in return they des$ise the 2ai'ans. R Co&in or re&ister to $ost "omments