Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1)
Rectangular steel cross-section, with constant thickness of 0.1 m. Numbers indicate height g measured in metres. Find end-deflection and compare. Analytical solution for 1) 23.126 mm
2)
3)
2D elements with thickness 0.1 m. 20x4 elements.
Problem
1) 1 Beam element with constant height equal 0.75 m.
23.221 mm
17.696 mm
1 beam element with variable height going from 1 1.00 00 meter at fixed 17 17.176 176 mm end to 0.50 m at free end. Section: Tapered I (1.0;0.1;0.5;0.1;0.1;0.1;0.1) 3) 4 node elements meshed 4x4 elements (height x length). Load 15.815 mm applied at middle node at the free end. Deformation determined at the same node. 3) 4 node elements meshed 4x10 elements (height x length). Load applied at middle node at the free end. Deformation determined at the same node. 3) 4 node elements meshed 4x20 elements (height x length). Load applied at middle node at the free end end. Deformation determined at the same node. 16.010 mm
16.022 mm
Contents
Element stiffness matrix for beam element Assembling the global stiffness matrix from the element stiffness matrices How to investigate the design (e.g. the placement of reinforcement) of a concrete beam Exercise: Find the optimal placement of the longitudinal reinforcement in a concrete beam
Beam Element
10
11
12
13
14
Structural Equation
15
16
17
18
19
Boundary Conditions
20
21
22
Local element stiffness matrix Independent of element placement in global coordinate system Dependent on material properties (e.g. elasticity modulus, E), section properties (e.g. area, A, moment of inertia, I) and element length, L Global element stiffness matrix Dependent on element placement in global coordinate system F Found d from f multiplying lti l i local l l element l t stiffness tiff matrix t i with ith transformation t f ti matrix Global system y matrix Dependent on degree-of-freedom numbering Found from assembling global element stiffness matrices according to the degree-of-freedom numbering
23
A concrete structure is not in an elastic state at failure At failure, failure the cross section is cracked and only a part of the section contributes to the load-carrying capacity i.e. the part in compression The elastic section section-force force distribution gives large values over supports Too expensive to design according to the elastic section forces, because the pressure zone of the cross section becomes very p y small, hence, large g amount of reinforcement would be needed Instead a plastic section-force distribution is chosen according to the lowerbound theory Find a statically acceptable and safe section force distribution, then the section design is on the safe side
24
25
Example: p 2.66 m wide concrete T-beam, reinforced in the longitudinal direction with a maximum of 4 bars at the top and bottom of the section.
Positive Failure Moment Number of reinforcement bars Bars at the top Bars at the bottom z [mm] Failure moment 4 4 0 414.3 229.1 7 4 3 392.9 380.1 8 4 4 388.6 429.7
26
27
Load case 1
75 kN/m 34 kN/m
98 kNm
28
Load case 2
75 kNm k 34 kN/m
216 kNm
172 kNm
216 kNm
124 kNm
106 kNm
65 kNm
29
Charniers are added left and right of the middle supports making the system statically determinate (fulfilling first part of the lower-bound theory)
In Staad.Pro, use the general/spec fan, choose beam then release and release Mz, both at the start and end location of the beam (two steps!)
30
The chaniers model a failure point. Hence, the moment is known at this point. Over the supports the moment is negative (tension at the top of the beam. Be aware that Staad.Pro Staad Pro uses a different sign convention) convention). Hence Hence, the maximum negative failure moment in this example is +264.5 kNm (not -264.5 kNm). At the failure points the known moment (failure moment) is added as an external moment. In Staad.Pro this is done by choosing Member Load, Concentrated Moment GZ and applying a negative moment at right end of the e bea beam (d (d1 = L, ,d d2 = 0) a and d a pos positive e moment o e a at left e e end do of the e bea beam, , i.e. e (d1=0, d2 =0). The moment distribution from this load case should give the same sign of the moment at the failure points as the elastic analysis. Then the total moment distribution is found as a sum of the moment distribution from the external load applied to the statically determinate system and the moment distribution from the applied external moments at the failure points.
31
Load case 1 Moment distribution for actual loading on statically determinate system
216 kNm
467 kNm
32
362 kNm
397 kNm
392 kNm
264,5 , kNm
264,5 kNm
216 kNm
18,9 kNm
33
Beam 1:
The moment distribution curve is moved 1/2zcot in the unfavourable direction. On the safe side cot=2.5 (DS411 p. 40)
34
Beam 2:
35
Beam 2:
36
37
Anchoring factor, 0,3 : smooth reinforcement bars 0,8 0,9 : rough reinforcement bars
Output report
38
Modify report file: "." to "," and insert failure moments at the node points
39
Moment Curves
80 60 40 20 0 -2 -20 -40 40 -60 -80 -100 -120 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
40
18
Today's Exercise
41
Office house
Beam to be designed
Today's Exercise
42
Today's Exercise
43
Positive Failure Moment Number of reinforcement bars Bars at the top Bars at the bottom z [mm] Failure moment 4 2 2 300 50 6 2 4 300 100
1/2zcot=375 mm , fyk y = 500 MPa , fck = 25 MPa Anchoring factor, = 0.8 anchoring length = 600 mm
Today's Exercise
44
Question 1 Fi 1. Find d the h placement l of f the h bending b di reinforcement i f of the beam, i.e. make a moment diagram. Hint: Find the moment curves with Staad.Pro and use e.g. Microsoft Excel for drawing the curves. An Excel file with the failure moments has been put on the homepage of the course.