Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
So influential is the group, that proposed new safety laws and regulations are filtered through the organization before being officially enacted.
The ESG currently consists of 279 individual members and has attracted a significant 159 organisations, representing not only the high safety challenges of the Construction industry, but also a broad spectrum of business sectors such as, Oil & Gas, Manufacturing, Hospitality, Healthcare etc..
The group is less about educating the general public, and more about reinforcing the safety message with the stakeholders charged to deal with safety in their everyday lives; with a view to this knowledge trickling down through organisations and into society.
Garry Crighton - HSE and Quality Management
Buildings Water Supply and Distribution System Desalination Plants Roads & Highways
CORRECT
5. DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE HSE Principles are adopted primarily via Management Processes and Procedures
6. MANAGEMENT REVIEW
From these objectives Corporate HSE, Quality and Security targets are set for all projects.
In addition to the above , all projects develop project specific HSE objectives/targets .
Organisation
(HSE Performance)
2.Teams
(Safety Behavioural Assessments)
Individuals
(HSE Culture/Climate Surveys)
8 Garry Crighton - HSE and Quality Management
Element 1 Overall
Garry Crighton - HSE and Quality Management 9
10
Organisational Context
Management Commitment (MC) - Perceptions of managements overt commitment to health and safety issues Communication (C) - The nature and efficiency of health and safety communications within the organization Priority of Safety (PS) - The relative status of health and safety issues within the organization Safety Rules and Procedures (SRP) - Views on the efficacy and necessity of rules and procedures Supportive Environment (SE) - The nature of the social environment at work, and the support derived from it Involvement (INV)- The extent to which safety is a focus for everyone and all are involved Personal Priorities and Need for Safety (PP) - The individuals view of their own health and safety management and need to feel safe Personal Appreciation of Risk (PAR) - How individuals view the risk associated with work Physical Work Environment (WE) - Perceptions of the nature of the physical environment Attitudes to specific safety related systems and procedures (for example, permit to work systems) may be included as necessary. 11
Social Environment
Individual Appreciation
Work Environment
- I am involved with safety issues at work (INV) - Corrective action is always taken when management is told about unsafe practices (MC) - I always get the equipment I need to do the job safely (WE) + Any other comments about Health and Safety in your workplace? For example, has there been a change in the last few months in any of the following? Coordination, management responsibility, worker consultation, safer construction design, planning, training/briefings etc.
+ Any improvements regards Health and Safety in our workplace? For example, priority, sub-contractors, safer construction methods, better planning, more time, more HSE training, greater penalties etc.
12
1% 6% 4% 28% 61%
Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree
13
0%
V illage
N etw ork
Strongly agree
Agree
E xpansion
P ipeline
P ipeline
Disagree
Strongly disagree
S team
14
21%
21%
44%
IA : Individual Appreciation, OC : Organisational Context, SE: Social Environment, WE: Work Environment
15
Social Environment
31%
33%
PS
67%
SE
SRP
C : Communication, MC : Management Commitment , PS : Priority of Safety , SRP : Safety Rules and Procedures
Individual Appreciation
PAR
44% 56%
PP
PAR : Personal Appreciation of Risk , PP : Personal Priorities and Need for Safety,
16
Codes of Conduct
Aspect: Disciplinary Measures Issue: Recommendations for disciplinary measures on grounds of HSE are not being addressed/honoured. Suggested Improvement : Effective actions must be taken by each project and across projects (HR/HSE). This includes termination for serious violations.
17
18
Incident Investigation
Incident Notification procedure revised to include the requirements based on the Severity/Criticality of the incidents- Link
Risk Assessments
The previous CAR (Consolidated Activity Risk) format was based on basic risk rating and controls. The new format TRA (Task Risk Assessment) addresses PAER risk, residual risks after initial controls and recovery measures in the event of barriers//controls being breeched.
19
21
22
23
24
OGP Contractors
Dodsal
2009
25
THANK YOU
27
5 4
3 The system effectiveness is measured, understood, manages change and satisfies relevant standards 2 The management system is communicated throughout all levels of the organisation 1 Processes and procedures are defined and documented 0 Nothing in Place
3 Strategies and objectives form a integrated element of the management system and are measured for compliance 2 Strategies and objectives are displayed and communicated to all personnel 1 Strategies and objectives are consistent with that of parent company, client and are documented 0 Nothing in Place
28
5.00
Elem ent
1 - Managem ent, Leadership, Com m itm ent & Accountability 2 - Risk Assessm ent & Managem ent 3 - Design/Engineering 4 - Project Managm ent and Construction Operations
3.00
5 - Em ployee Com petency & Involvem ent 6 - Occupational Health 7 - Third Party Managem ent
Level
8 - Im pact upon the Com m unity & Em ergency Plan 9 - Incident Investigation & Analysis 10 - Measurem ent, Audit & Review
Element
Garry Crighton - HSE and Quality Management
Back
29
Observation of Event
1. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT Hard hat Safety glasses with shields Hearing protection-ear plug or muffs Face shield Respiratory protection-P2/P3 soft mask, half face, air line Protective clothing-overalls, L/S shirt + trousers Gloves
yes
21 21 6 12 3 25
1 3 4 12 1 25
0 22 24 10 24 4 50 0 0 0 134 65.67164
30
Total Observations
31
100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 80.00% Safety Perform ance % 70.00% 63.80% 60.00% 66.00% 60.00% 56.00%
20.00%
Back
32
33
REDUCTION
FINAL SCORE
SET STANDARD
MET / MAX IMUM ASSESSED REPEAT IMMINENT ENVIRONMENTAL MINIMUM FINAL SCORE POSSIBLE TOTAL DEFICIENCY DANGER DANGER STANDARD NOT MET
51
52
53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
Housekeeping Communication and Coordination Health & Hygiene Pre-Commissioning & Commissioning Spill Control and Prevention W ork Area Lighting Personal Protective Equipment (P.P.E.) Hand Tools Powder Actuated Tools Power Tools and Power Equipment Hot Work (Welding, Heating, Burning) Electrical Equipment Operations First Line Breaks Excavation and Trenching Steel Erection and Floor and Wall Opening Material Handling and Storage
23.0 7.0 53.0 6.0 14.0 10.0 92.0 13.0 17.0 46.0 103.0 62.0 159.0 36.0 39.0 52.0 31.0
23.0 7.0 53.0 6.0 14.0 10.0 92.0 13.0 17.0 46.0 103.0 62.0 159.0 36.0 39.0 52.0 31.0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
23.00 7.00 53.00 6.00 14.00 10.00 92.00 13.00 17.00 46.00 103.00 62.00 159.00 36.00 39.00 52.00 31.00
20.7 6.3 47.7 5.4 12.6 9 82.8 11.7 15.3 41.4 92.7 55.8 143.1 32.4 35.1 46.8 27.9
MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET
Back
34
Legend:
Accidents with Severity Rating 2 and above and High Potential near misses of likely severity 3 and above, shall be reported to H.O.
H.O. Function Head HSEQ
Severity 5 4 3 2 1
Project Manager
Chairman / BOD / OB
Reporting Requirements Immediate (verbal/SMS) notification, 24 Hrs. report and Investigation Report as soon as possible to HO. Where applicable/appropriate Heads of Operations to notify Chairman
Immediate (verbal/SMS) notification, 24 Hrs. report and Investigation Report as soon as possible to HO
Legend:
Notify up line
Informed
35
DOD-CP-HSE-008
HSE COMPETENCE ASSURANCE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS & RESPONSE HSE SURVEILLANCE HSE COMMUNICATION, PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION HSE INCIDENT INVESTIGATION, CLASSIFICATION AND REPORTING
36
CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT
How have the Safe Work Practices been rolled out across all operations? How are staff empowered to intervene on-site? What are the highest risk activities onsite? Show me your consolidated HSE Action plan. What is being done to reduce exposure/risks in Road Transport/ Logistics & Worksite Hazards? How often do you meet with the Prime Contract Administrator? How does the CR exercise controls on you? What keeps you awake at night on HSSE, and why? How can we (i.e. Dodsal) help you to be safe(r)? Are HSSE responsibilities clear to all staff in the field? How do you know that staff have right competences/ experience to safely do their jobs? How are health and welfare matters managed on-site?
TOXICS: What is the toxicity of the chemicals around you? Can the work you do change the air around you? Could your worksite be considered a confined space? THERMAL: Where are the hot/cold surfaces or products in your work area? Does your work generate heat or cold? How could hot or cold environment affect your team? PEOPLE: Can everyone explain their role? Are communication channels clearly understood? Are there any personal problems within the team? Does the team have appropriate competencies?
37
38
59644479 64380519
2 2
9 13
12 1 44 8
140 224
8 14
12 18
74 46
7 2 2
1 6
3963273 2 3121598 7
15 17
NM Near-miss MTC Medical Treatment Case PDI Property Damage Incident EI Environmental Incident LTIFR Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate VAR Vehicle Accident Rate
RWC Restricted Work Case FI Fire Incident RTA Road Traffic Accident SR Severity Rate
39
40
41
42
100 Observations
Open
92.59
60 43.36 40
20
0 QASP Oxy Ruwais Sulphur Transco JV3 Jumeirah Park NGL Gasco CCWP RGX2
43
Activity/Action
Source
Summary Status
11/2/2006
IMS 1
GC
19
60
11.4
30/05/06
IMS Philosphy doc and IMS Policy complete. IMS Programme long lead. IMS Controls Assessment complete. IMS Imp. Plan in use. IMS Interface Plan tba. All to be approved by management. Standard format to be issued to all HOD's for completion.
Define roles and responsbilities for all HSE and Quality personnel. Define roles and responsbilities for all other personnel. Define distibution (info/review/approval) of all HSE and Quality documents esp. upline Review HSE and Quality involvement in Bid process and develop optimum checklist Define HSE and Quality roles and responsibilities for top management esp. regular structures visits to sites
11/2/2006
IMS 2
GC
16
60
9.6
15/04/06
19/03/06
IMS 3
GC/All HOD'S
17
90
15.3
19/05/06
19/03/06
IMS 4
GC
12
90
10.8
15/04/06
3/27/2006
IMS 5
GC
16
60
9.6
6/30/2006
10
3/27/2006
IMS 6
GC
13
60
7.8
5/30/2006
44
Short description:
ALLOCATED PRIORITY IS CALCULATED ON THE FOLLOWING "WEIGHTING": Estimated Weighting of Impact Low Medium High
AREA OF IMPACT
Insignificant
Very High
Score 1
Score 2
Score 3 3
Score 4
Score 5 5 5
3 3
Garry Crighton - HSE and Quality Management 45
Short description:
ALLOCATED PROGRESS IS CALCULATED ON THE FOLLOWING "WEIGHTING": STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT Initiation Definition/Planning Development/Approval Development/Approval Development/Approval Implementation/Rollout Evaluation Estimated Weighting of Impact % Completion 10 20
46
100.00 90.00 80.00 % Earned Value 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 Q1-Q2 2006 10.00 13.51 10 Q3-Q4 2006 10.19 14.82 20 Q1-Q2 2007 8.87 14.41 12.037037 Q3-Q4 2007 16.29 21.40 16.11 Q1-Q2 2008 23.55 31.82 16.11 Q3-Q4 2008 29.52 44.93 12.56 Q1-Q2 2009 30.43 52.69 64.30 Q3-Q4 2009 30.43 66.45 55.00 Q1-Q2 2010 31.06 73.15 55.00
Work load increased due to Project Lessons Learnt exercise (Num ber of activities incresed)
P1 P2 P3
P1 P2 P3
47
Business excellence
D od sa
lB us in es
Business Processes Re-Engineering June 2010 Review Operations against ISO 10006 BS 31100 May 2010 Review Security arrangements against ISO/PAS 22399 May 2010
HSE MS for new business sector July 2010 Fully Implement Safety Leadership and Contractor HSE Capability programmes June 2010 Roll out HSE Surveillance and Inspection procedure June 2010
Do ds al
HS E
48