Nillei_Paisey 1

Answei each of the following essay questions. Be suie to explain youi answeis fully. uive
examples to illustiate youi statements thioughout. Complete answeis will be compiiseu of
thiee paits: i) a statement oi statements that answei the question; ii) an explanation of that
statement(s); anu iii) examples to illustiate those explanations.

!" $%&' &() '%) *&+, -.*/.,),'0 .1 '%) )2/)(+*),'&3 4)0+5,6

Expeiimental uesigns aim to ueteimine oi "pioviue eviuence" of causality. They aie
basically explanatoiy, iathei than uesciiptive in natuie. The cential components of an
expeiimental uesign incluue:

1. The ieseaich question oi hypothesis
2. Ranuomizeu subjects oi paiticipants
S. Ranuomizeu assignment to two (oi moie) gioups - contiol anu expeiimental
4. Contiol gioup
S. Expeiimental oi tieatment gioups
6. Tieatment (inuepenuent vaiiable)
7. Placebo (uepenuent vaiiable) The placebo assesses the counteifactual oi what
happens without the tieatment

7" 82/3&+, %.9 '%) -3&00+-&3 )2/)(+*),' &33.90 '%) ()0)&(-%)( '. 0&'+01: )&-% .1 '%)
'%()) -(+')(+& ,)-)00&(: '. )0'&;3+0% -&<0&3+':"

Establishing causality iequiies that the outcome oi expeiimental iesults aie the iesult of
an exogenous tieatment, piopei time oiuei, anu covaiiance between the cause anu effect.

The classical expeiiment eliminates oi minimizes enuogenous factois thiough
ianuomization anu statistical equivalence. Statistical equivalence involves ianuom
assignment to the expeiimental gioups - meaning each subject has an equal chance of
being selecteu foi the tieatment gioups. The laigei the sample population, the highei the
piobably that both gioups have basically equivalent chaiacteiistics. Ranuom assignment
anu statistical equivalence minimize any inteifeience of enuogenous vaiiables.

Time-oiuei oi ieveise causation holus that cause (tieatment) pieceues the effect
(outcome oi iesult). Foi example, in the textbook, the ieseaicheis basically lookeu at
whethei the effect of time limits on welfaie woulu influence employment. Foi the
ieseaicheis to satisfy the time-oiuei ciiteiia all paiticipants woulu have been ieceiving
welfaie anu they woulu not have been employeu.

Covaiiance simply means that theie is a ielationship between the vaiiables anu this
ielationship inuicates that whenevei the inuepenuent vaiiable is piesent, a specific
outcome occuis on the uepenuent vaiiable. Conveisely, one coulu say that whenevei the
inuepenuent vaiiable is not piesent, the outcome on the uepenuent vaiiable uoes not
occui.


Nillei_Paisey 2
=" $%&' &() '%) &4>&,'&5)0 ?.( 5()&')0' 0'(),5'%0@ .1 )2/)(+*),'&3 4)0+5,0
5),)(&33:6 $%&' +0 +' &;.<' '%) )2/)(+*),'&3 4)0+5, '%&' 5+>)0 +' '%+0 ?'%)0)@
0'(),5'%06

Expeiimental uesigns offei the most objectiveunbiaseu stuuies of inuepenuent oi
explanatoiy vaiiables on uepenuent vaiiables - paiticulaily with ianuom assignment by
computei. In this case, computeis pioviue conuitions foi "stiuctuieu" ianuom selection,
tiaces oi eviuence of the selection piocess, anu fiimei assuiance that hiuuen, enuogenous
vaiiables aie not biasing the effects of the inuepenuent vaiiable on the uepenuent vaiiable.

In auuition, classic expeiimental uesigns allow ieseaicheis to stuuy multiple tieatments,
compaie tieatments, anu, if useful, look at anu compaie the iesults when using a placebo.
Foi example, one might want to examine the effectiveness two types of exeicise oi factois
on cholesteiol level anu bone uensity. (This expeiimental uesign is also iefeiieu to as a
two-factoi uesign.) 0ui two inuepenuent vaiiables oi factois will be the 2 exeicise
piogiams - one piogiam uses only weight baiing exeicises, anothei piogiam uses only
caiuiovasculai exeicise - anothei piogiam uses both weight baiing anu caiuiovasculai
exeicise - the final gioup oi contiol uses a placebo. In this case a placebo might involve
leaining about how exeicise often impioves health. The auvantage heie is that with one
sample, ianuomly assigneu to the foui gioups oi conuitions (S tieatment gioups anu 1
placebo oi contiol), one can evaluate the effects of specific exeicise piogiams on health.
Anu, one can compaie the finuings, looking foi any statistical uiffeiences among the 4
gioups oi conuitions. 0ne woulu think - oi hypothesize the exeicise piogiam iesulting in
the laigest statistical significance woulu be the weigh baiing anu caiuiovasculai piogiam.

0sing the same sample, one coulu stiatify the sample population accoiuing to age. Then
ianuomize each age gioup. Bo the exeicise piogiams act on the uepenuant vaiiables
uiffeiently, accoiuing to age. Aie theie significant uiffeiences anu, if so, what age gioups
piouuce the most significant uiffeience.


A" B4),'+1: &,4 )2/3&+, '%) -%&33),5)0 '%&' &() -.**.,3: 1&-)4 +, '(:+,5 '. <0) &
-3&00+-&3 )2/)(+*),'&3 4)0+5, +, '%) 9.(34 ?+")" 1+)34 )2/)(+*),'0@6

Classical expeiimental uesign in the fielu has seveial weaknesses anu all ielate this
uesign's "limiteu geneializability." Nost ieal woilu expeiiments aie conuucteu within a
specific geogiaphical space oi location. While some ieseaicheis may aigue the claim that
theii sample population is iepiesentative acioss a bioau geogiaphic aiea, a stuuy
conuucteu in one geogiaphical aiea cannot uefinitively apply to othei geogiaphical aiea,
paiticulaily one wheie meuical oi employment oi euucational iesouices as well as weathei
conuitions vaiy wiuely. Each of these factois can contiibute to the outcomes of a stuuy.
Take the welfaie, time limits, anu employment stuuy citeu in the textbook. If this stuuy
weie conuucteu in the wintei in Ninnesota oi Wyoming, the iesults woulu piobably look
quite uiffeient fiom the Floiiua iesults. Buiing the wintei months, paiticulaily in aieas
with haish winteis, subjects woulu be less likely to finu tianspoitation to job inteiviews;
they may also not have sufficient waim clothing to look foi employment vigoiously. Foi
Nillei_Paisey S
these ieasons anu many otheis, geogiaphy limits the geneializability of classic
expeiimental uesign.

Time is anothei factoi that limits geneializability. If examining the effects of exeicise on
health, summei months oi tempeiate weathei might be moie conuucive to getting out anu
paiticipating in the expeiiment. What aie the effects of time (of yeai, economic maiket) on
classic stuuies. In auuition, ianuomizeu fielu expeiiments iequiie substantial time to plan
anu caiiy out with iesults often ueliveieu a long time aftei the stuuy was initially
conuucteu.

Nost clinical tiials oi health stuuies iequiie volunteeis anu often these volunteeis come
out of a population with similai chaiacteiistics. So, obtaining a tiuly iepiesentative sample
is not likely. Noieovei, those who volunteei aie often uiffeient fiom those who uo not.
Enuogenous vaiiables may luik beneath the suiface.

C" D.*/&() &,4 -.,'(&0' )2/)(+*),'&3 4)0+5,0 9+'% .;0)(>&'+.,&3 0'<4+)0 9+'%
-.,'(.30 ?-.>)()4 +, & /()>+.<0 -%&/')(@" $%&' &4>&,'&5)0 4.)0 .,) %&>) .>)( '%)
.'%)(6

Expeiimental uesign examines how inuepenuent vaiiables act on uepenuent vaiiables. It
is quantitative, numeiically baseu, explanatoiy, anu puiposeu to uncoveieu causal
vaiiables. 0bseivational stuuies aie geneially exploiatoiy. They piouuce nonnumeiic uata
in many foims - images, auuio, wiitten tiansciipts anu uocuments, oi case stuuies - anu
they aim to unueistanu the cultuie, situation oi behaviois of a population. While
obseivational stuuies aim to unueistanu anu uocument, this uocumentation shoulu not
ieflect the bias of the obseivei oi ieseaichei; iathei, it shoulu ieflect the ieal woilu
expeiiences (what is, not what one says it is) of a gioup oi population anu as the gioup
expeiiences anu peifoims in theii lives.

Expeiimental uesign collects a uiffeient foim of uata than obseivational stuuy anu
uesign. It iuentifies a uisciete vaiiable oi vaiiables anu seeks to examine the iesult the
vaiiables piouuce. In contiast, obseivational stuuies look foi in-uepth anu nuanceu
expeiiential uata - the uata may offei some explanations that class expeiimental uesign
woulu examine, but the vaiious obseivational methouologies seek to iecoiu chaiacteiistics
anu ielationships. In giounueu theoiy, obseivational stuuies give iise to theoietical
constiucts about the gioup unuei stuuy.

Both classic expeiimental stuuy anu obseivational stuuy offei excellent methouologies
foi the collection of uata. The puipose of one's ieseaich will ueteimine the methouology. If
one is seeking to uesciibe unueistanu, claiify possible contiauictions, oi foim in-uepth
accounts of a peison, gioup, oi cultuie obseivational stuuies will seive well. Theii stiength
is in iich uetaileu iepoits that offei quantitative ieseaicheis potential vaiiables to examine
anu with a view to uncoveiing causal mechanisms. Bowevei, once a uetaileu account of a
situation has been obtaineu - thiough obseivation - specific vaiiables may have come to
light anu can foim the basis foi quantitative, explanatoiy expeiiments.

Nillei_Paisey 4
E" F0+,5 '%) '..30 &>&+3&;3) +, GH $.(4I -.*/.0) & /(.-)00 4+&5(&* .1 1.<( ?A@
4+11)(),' >&(+)'+)0 .1 &, )2/)(+*),'&3 4)0+5,"











J)0+5, !K L&,4.* &00+5,*),'M /()N')0'O/.0'N')0'























R
e
c
u
Ranuom
assignment to
expeiimental
oi contiol
gioups
Pie-test
all
subjects
Expeiimental

Contiol
Tieatment

0utcomes
Compaie
Nillei_Paisey S



J)0+5, 7K L&,4.* &00+5,*),'
-.,'(.3 &,4 = )2/)(+*),'&3
5(.</0
























Compaie all outcomes.
Peifoim a t-Test to ueteimine
effect of tieatments on
cholesteiol levels
anu bone uensity




Pie-test
all
subjects
Ranuom
assignment to
expeiimental
gioups oi
contiol gioup


X1

X2
XS

Contiol
0 Weight
Exeicise

Weight &
Caiuio
0utcome
0utcome
0utcome
0utcome
Placebo

Weight &
Caiuio
Nillei_Paisey 6






J)0+5, =K P9. Q(.</ 82/)(+*),'&3 J)0+5, ?,. /()N')0' R (&,4.* &00+5,*),' .,3:@





































Ranuomly
assigneu to
expeiimental
gioup

Ranuomly
assigneu to
expeiimental
gioup

Reciuit
Subjects
Tieatment 0utcome
0utcome
Nillei_Paisey 7


J)0+5, AK H.3.*., S.<(NQ(.</ J)0+5,









































Reciuits
Ranuomly
Assigneu
expeiimental
gioup
Ranuomly
Assigneu
contiol
gioup
Ranuomly
Assigneu
expeiimental
gioup
Ranuomly
Assigneu
contiol
gioup

Pie-Test

Pie-Test
Tieatment
Tieatment
0utcome
0utcome
0utcome
0utcome
Nillei_Paisey 8


T" $%&' &() '%) *&+, /.+,'0 *&4) ;: S&((+,5'., ?7UU=@I H%)(*&, ?7UUU@ &,4
$)+0;<(4 ?7UU=@ ()5&(4+,5 '%) <0) .1 )2/)(+*),'&3 4)0+5,06 J. :.< &5()) .(
4+0&5()) 9+'% '%)+( /.0+'+.,6 $%: .( 9%: ,.'6

Faiiington maintains that expeiimental contiol is supeiioi to statistical
contiol - meaning that inteinal valiuity is stiongei when paiticipants aie ianuomly
assigneu to gioups. Faiiington also notes, uispaiagingly, that iesults fiom non-ianuomizeu
expeiiments uiffei fiom iesults in ianuomizeu expeiiments.

Faiiington claims that uuiing the 196us - 197us ianuomizeu expeiiments weie conuucteu
on coiiectional effectiveness because policy makeis weie tiaineu in social science ieseaich
anu wanteu empiiical eviuence as a basis foi policy uecisions.

0nfoitunately, when piincipal policymakeis of this eia changeu, foi political ieasons, the
policymakeis wanteu quick answeis, weie tiaineu in statistical contiol, anu aigueu
pessimistically about iehabilitation. In auuition, inconvenient - politically unpopulai
ieseaich iesults -- weie suppiesseu.

Sheiman (2uu8) fiist piesents a histoiical oveiview of the value of RFTs as eviuenceu in
meuicine, since 1948. Be views the contiol gioup anu ianuomizeu gioups as essential in
piesenting counteifactual scenaiios. uiven these counteifactual scenaiios, RFTs aie
justifieu anu offei a means of justifying suppoit anu funuing foi expeiimental ciiminology.

Sheiman specifies thiee mechanisms - I am thinking that these mechanisms (while making
sense) aie cential to the bouy of liteiatuie in ciiminology -- These mechanisms incluue
socialization, ueteiience, anu incapacitation. Sheiman auuiesses each mechanism anu its
implications. Be emphasizes socialization as the most piomising mechanism in compliance
with law.

I believe Sheiman's emphasis on the value of socialization is well consiueieu - those
stuuies that appeal to one's moial sense, as a means of shaping behavioi is inteiesting. This,
of couise, "assumes" oi implies that an offenuei's moial sense is sufficiently stiong anu
integiateu within peisonality. Bow is moial sense inculcateu. Anu, at what age is moial
sense uevelopeu. Then, if a stiong moial sense is not uevelopeu at a paiticulai age, what
piogiam neeus to be establisheu to instill a value of moiality.

I am both inteiesteu in seeing offenueis socializeu with iegaiu foi othei human beings anu
theii conceins anu also seeing offenueis who aie iesistant to a piogiam of socialization,
incaiceiateu humanely. I also woulu like to see those incaiceiateu contiibute to society anu
piouuce necessities anu piovisions that might ielieve the homeless anu impoveiisheu. I
ceitainly suppoit expeiimental ciiminology anu RFT with petty offenueis. Enviionment
plays a key iole in socialization anu shaping a peison's outlook with iegaiu to being
accepteu into mainstieam society.