Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Black Op Author(s): Fred Moten Source: PMLA, Vol. 123, No. 5, Special Topic: Comparative Racialization (Oct.

, 2008), pp. 17431747 Published by: Modern Language Association Stable URL: . Accessed: 11/01/2014 13:33
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

Modern Language Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to PMLA.

This content downloaded from on Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:33:55 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions





another world while passing through this one, graphically disordering the administered scarcity fromwhich black studies flows as wealth. The

emergency inwhich the poor trouble the proper, is our open secret. This open secret is the aim of black studies?a weight, a comport ment, where what it is to carry converges with what it is to arrive, always more and less than completely. The critique of the structures and tendencies whose delimitation and denial of that aim appear in tegral to their own foundation has rightly been understood to be in

cultivated nature of this situated volatility, this emergent poetics ofthe

is Western Civilization" dispensable to black studies: "the critique of black studies, according toCedric Robinson, which is to say thatw1 is called Western civilization is the object of black studies. This black optics is an auditory affair: night vision given in and through voices that shadow legitimate discourse from below, breaking its ground up

Cyrille's brushed analytic of flavor; the breathy tortuousness of Jeanne Lee's brightening of taste; the seen, seared, heard, sheared relation be tween what is there and not there, on the outskirts of all belonging, that themusic gives.) Bearing vast repertoires of high-frequency com plaints, imperceptible frowns, withering turns, silent sidesteps, and ever-vigilant attempts not to see and hear, black studies' pleasurable series of immanent upheavals and bad, more than subjunctive moods are the critique of Western civilization. Often this critique shows up
FRED MOTEN teaches in the Department of English at Duke University.He isauthor of In theBreak: The Aesthetics of theBlack Radical Tradition (U of Minnesota P, 2003) and of three collections of poetry, Arkan sas (Pressed Wafer, 2000), / Ran from Itbut Was Still in It (Cusp, 2007), and Hughson's Tavern (Leon Works, 2008). He is working on a book to be called Stolen Life: Black ness and Form (U of Minnesota P).

into broken air; scenes rendered otherwise by undertones that are overheard, but barely. (Consider the rustle of a garment as the open, internally noncoterminous, interrogatory punctuation of a collective chop or clap; the worked, songlike irregularity animating Andrew

in a range of unpaid, imposed pedagogical duties carried out at vari ous in all its justifiable, fetishized and conferences; facultymeetings as a it is often manifest sublation of anger mistaken performativity, for uncut ire or the absence of ire. Black students have to think about the give and take of such surplus being stripped from the thickness


This content downloaded from on Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:33:55 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

4> OD lm n
** to 4-* c 4> 3 C 0 a to 4) &. a* 0 u

Black Op f PMLA
of their skin, then decide that it is best under stood, best distilled, as themood for love. This iswhy Robinson is equally adamant thatblack studies' criticalmodalities are driven toward and directed by an aim?the ontologi cal totality and itspreservation?that, in all its secret openness, is called blackness. Black stud ies' aim has always been bound up with and endangered by itsobject. When the prosecuto ies' ongoing struggle with themisplacement of its aim and object. A kind of carelessness is revealed?as is made when available

invocations of home are subject to the continual misrecognition of their perpetual ideation of perpetual motion, while claims on homelessness are held to be everything other than themost radical mode of being-in-the

if the truth of old-new things through their neglect

rial gaze that is trained on that object (Western civilization) passes over that aim (blackness,


is not but nothing other thanWestern civilization), the danger is brutally, ironically redoubled. Talk of the preservation of the on tological totality produces great consterna tion in certain circles, which is unsurprising

world. Similarly, when the strained desire the history of thinking imposes on those who have to think their way out of the exclusion ary constrictions of that history succumbs to

given the scarred, grainy, phonic inscription that accompanies such utterance. When that
as an always-already-broken acoustic mirror,

the antierotic power of summary judgment, the work that emerges is undone by what it misses. Behind such pseudocritical nonsolici tousness often lies a conflation of totality and the specter of a still univocality from which idea of blackness is derived

sound is received as mere catastrophic effect,

an etiolated


critique turns into litigation in the hope of si lencing it. But catastrophe must be sounded


again and again momentarily escaping danger. Black studies break/s a rhythm whose tactile complexity must be maintained while moving in and out of the institution, where smooth
never seems to have a chance. Black

It is in the recognition of the interplay of rupture and irruption in and as the given that black studies' aim and object intermit tently, inconsistently, but serially reconvene,

and expansion whose irreducible priority per sists only insofar as preservation is transfor

for the terrible, beautiful resonance itbears of that anoriginal recording of constant incision

order that it might be rescued by appeals to that never fully regulate their multiplicity own dismissive impulses. In fact, to be down with the dialectic of home and homelessness within which blackness persists, a dialectic that n(eg)ation language seems to bring into the sharpest audiovisual relief, one must have indexed inhabited and (but more than this?grasped in order to have thrown and de

parted) the ensemble of uptown operations that are migration's precedent, held, as they are, in captive movements that still take place and flightup the country. The mysteries of a certain kind of locomotive whine are always


one In abiding with this distinction, an instantiate adequate challenge to might instrumental antiessential the voraciously by good intentions, that sanctions black stud ism, powered in an intense and terrible way

ontological distinction" between blackness and more generally, the the people (which is to say, are called black. things) that

studies' inordinate feeling for divisions and collections requires every last bit of texture, as an opening gambit held in reserve?the "para

barred from travel and forcibly removed. The as its own conven submerged span remains tion. So that out ofthe unjustified margin be tween the ascription of contagion as slur and the vicious

given and withheld by way of the underwater cables some alien folk lay down when they are

infatuation surveillance imposes, a general, material aspiration, the is blackness condition of possibility of politics understood, tracks, as the along but also off Foucauldian of race war irreducible unconventionality covert, gentle violence in themidst of conver sion, an effect of conversion and imminently

This content downloaded from on Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:33:55 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions


Fred Moten


gressively forgiving modesty. No government can take responsibility for it,however much it emerges in and out of governmental condi
at the same time, it remains unrespon tions;

convertible in and as this essence of covering and ag rolled back (flourished, ex-caped)

Black studies' concern with what

it is to own

to mine what is held in one's dispossession, been possessed, makes itmore pos having sible to embrace

0 ft to fS 0 3 a ft 3

brings the secrecy and open ness of this gathering into relief as well.

sive to the governance that it calls and the governments that it rouses. The paraontologi cal distinction

often suffers tive, righteous obscurity?now in and revealed reviled critique that being advances by way of what is supposed to be the closure of authenticity, essence, and ex perience, all of which continue to be made to

All this?which was always so essentially and authentically clear in itswrought, inven

in the interest of putting down roots or dis be said, also, to con claiming them?could stitute a departure, though it may well be into
a stasis more severe than the one such work

the underprivilege of being sentenced to the gift of constant escape. The strain of black studies that strains against this interplay of itinerancy and identity?whether


ft) !* ST ft

imagines (itself to be leaving). In contradis tinction to such skepticism, one might plan, to stay a believer and like Curtis Mayfield, of metacritical

share themost precise and predictably easy to-dismiss name, local habitation, and com munal form of life. That blackness is often profiled and found wanting what it is and has, inwork that involuntarily falls under the ad mittedly imprecise rubric of African Ameri can studies, is also unsurprising and is due not so much to chauvinistic

away, phonoptic black operations?expressive of an autopoetic organization inwhich flight and inhabitation modify each other?that have been thrust upon paradoxically it. The burden of this

black optimism, is bound up with what it is to claim blackness and the appositional, run

therefore to avow what might be called a kind optimism. Such optimism,

reactions to real

or perceived chauvinism but to the fact that blackness's distinction from a specific set of things that are called black remains largely resistance to this unthought. Paraontological brand of particular orthodoxy requires a pa to relation blackness, which is not leonymic in need of a highlight it already has or an ex
trachromatic saturation it

ity,animating possibility of escape from. What

aleatory goal is our historic the reality of escape in and the

and imaginative relation to the terms abolition

and reconstruction in a genuine, fundamen

if the study of comparative racial ization begins to extend and deepen its critical

pant internal differentiation it already bears. As such, it need not be uncoupled from the forms that came to stand (in) for blackness, to which they could not be reduced and which could not be reduced to them. What is often overlooked in blackness is bound up with what has often been over seen. Certain experiences of being tracked,


is or a ram

greatest possible centrifugal force into other, outer, space? Then, even though these terms index a specific history in the United States, their continued relevance and resonance will be international as well as intranational insofar as the ongoing aggressive constitution of the
modern nation-state as a carceral entity ex

tal, fantastic, radical collective rethinking of them thatwill take into account their histori cal ground while also propelling themwith the

managed, cornered in seemingly open space are inextricably bound to an aesthetically and politically dangerous supplementarity, an internal exteriority waiting to get out, as if the prodigal's

tends histories of forced migration and stolen labor and insofar as the imperial suppression of
movements that would excavate new aesthetic,

political, and economic dispositions?as

of course, as those movements

well, and


return were to leaving itself.

is a global



This content downloaded from on Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:33:55 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

4) OD im JS to c 4) 13 C 0 a to 4> * 0 w

Black Op

an irrevocable, antenational combination of terror and enjoyment, longing and rejection, that Hartman,

reconstruction might

then be seen as ongo ing projects animating the study of compara tive racialization as well as black studies, two

fields that will be seen as each other's inner most ends, two fields thatwill be understood as constituted through the claim theymake on?their thinking of and in?blackness. Finally, one might plan to continue to

in particular, illuminates). the force that Ultimately, paraontological is transmitted in the long chain of life and


that there is such a thing as black ness and that blackness has an essence given

death performances that are the concern of black studies is horribly misunderstood if it is understood as exclusive. Everyone whom blackness claims, which is to say everyone, can claim blackness. That claim is neither the

in striated, ensemblic, authentic experience (however much a certain natural bend is

amplified by the force of every kind of event, however productive such constant incon must be of new un of form and stancy shape

first nor the last anticipatory reorientation but is, rather, an irreducible element of the differentially repeating plane that intersects the comparativist sphere. In this regard, black studies might best be described as a location habitually lost and found within a moving tendency where one looks back and forth and wonders how Utopia came to be submerged in the interstices and and animates

of Lindon Barrett, Herman Bennett, Daphne Brooks, Nahum Chandler, Denise Ferreira da Silva, Brent Edwards, Saidiya Hartman, Sha ron Holland, and Achilles Mbembe, among others) that blackness has always emerged as nothing other than the richest possible combination of dispersion and permeability

derstandings of essence and experience). It is obvious (particularly after the recent lessons

on the outskirts ofthe fierce and urgent now. The temporal paradox of optimism?that it is, on the one hand, a necessarily futurial at titude while being, on the other hand, in its proper Leibnizian formulation, an assertion ofthe necessity, Tightness, and timelessness in of the always already existing?resonates

worry over the supposed intranational domi nance of blackness broadly and unrigorously conceived biological minoritarian

in and as the mass improvisation and pro tection of the very idea of the human. Thus, concern over the supposedly stultifying force of authenticity exerted by supposedly restric tive and narrow conceptions of blackness, or

the slim gap between analytic immersion and deictic reserve. This bitter earth is the best of all possible worlds, a fact that necessitates the
renewed, reconstructed, realization of

native intensities thatmove position


(in ways that presuppose its strict limitation within an unlimited

field), or anxiety over the pu tatively intradiasporic hegemony of a certain mode of blackness (which presumes national as well as biological determinations that are in continually over- and underdetermined) dexes some other trouble, which we would do well to investigate. Such investigation is best


of voluntary exposure in order to understand how the un derground operates out in, and as, the open. the relation between

through the op secrecy and forced

the limit and

the open? Between blackness and the limit? Between a specific and materially redoubled finitude called blackness and the open? The new critical discourse on the relation between blackness and death has begun these questions. That discourse to approach reveals that

accompanied by vigilant remembrance of and commitment to the fact that blackness is

present (as E. R Thompson said of the English working class) at its own making and that all the people who are called black are given in and to that presence, which exceeds them (in

it cannot optimism doesn't require?indeed, that within?the of relation; persist repression to it is lives rather, always (which say, escapes) in the faithful, postfatal assertion of a right to refuse, in the prenatal instantiation of a

This content downloaded from on Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:33:55 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions


Fred Moten


collective negative tendency to differ, and in the resistance to the regulative powers that resistance, differing, and refusal call into be ing. The general insistence thatwe don't mind

Works Cited
Barrett, Lindon. Blackness and Value: Seeing Double. Mexico: Abso Cambridge UP, 1998. Cambridge: L. Africans in Colonial Bennett, Herman

ing thatwe have what we need, thatwe can get there from here, that there's nothing wrong with us or even, in this regard,with here, even

leaving here is inseparable from the fact that it's all right. Black optimism persists in think

lutism, Christianity, and Afro-Creole Consciousness, 1570-1640. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2003. Brooks, A. Bodies inDissent: Per Daphne Spectacular formances ofRace and Freedom, 1850-1910. Durham: Duke UP, 2006. Nahum Dmitiri. Bois and The Problem the Discourses a Global P, 2007. of Diaspora. Cam W. E. B. Du Fordham of Pure Being: of the Negro. Idea of Race.

ft 0 n t ft to TS 0 3 a ft 3 t+ to & r* ST -I w ft

as italso bears an obsession with why it is that difference calls the same, that resistance calls regulative power, into existence, thereby se curing the simultaneously vicious and vacant


UP, forthcoming. Ferreira. Toward U ofMinnesota

da Silva, Denise Minneapolis: Edwards,

enmity that characterizes here and now, form ing and deforming us. However much trouble stays inmind and, therefore, in the light of a certain interest that the ones who are without

Brent Hayes. The Practice bridge: Harvard UP, 2003.

Foucault, Michel.

"Society Must Be Defended": Lectures at theCollege de France, 1975-1976. Trans. David Macey. 2003. Saidiya V. Lose Your Mother: A Journey along theAtlantic Slave Route. New York: Farrar, 2007. Scenes

New York: Picador, Hartman, -.

interests have inmaking as much trouble as possible, there is cause for optimism as long

as there is a need for optimism. Cause and need converge in the bent school or marginal church inwhich we gather together to be in the name of being otherwise.

Terror, Slavery, and Self of Subjection: inNineteenth Century America. Oxford: Ox Making ford UP, 1997. Holland, Death 2000. Mbembe, Achilles. Trans. "Necropolitics." jes. Public Culture 15 (2003): 11-40. Cedric Radical J. "Capitalism, An Tradition: Libby Meint and the Sharon and Patricia. Raising theDead: Durham: Readings of Duke UP,




Marxism, Interview

I dedicate this essay to the memory of Lindon Barrett, a scholar of beautiful, severe, generous brilliance. His in our fluence on me?and friendship?overcame delay and survived estrangement. His work was driven by love.

Black Morse." 4 Nov.

Perspectives on Anarchist 2001 <

by Chuck Theory 3.1 (1999).

perspectives/5robinsoninterview.htm>. Thompson, E. P. TheMaking of theBritish Working Class. New York: Vintage, 1966.

This content downloaded from on Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:33:55 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions